Safety and Effects of a Four-Week Preoperative Low-Load Resistance Training With Blood Flow Restriction on Pre- and Postoperative Quadriceps Strength in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background/Objectives Enhancing preoperative quadriceps strength and mitigating quadriceps strength loss due to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is crucial for post-TKA recovery. This study compared the safety and effect of a four-week preoperative regimen of low-load resistance training with blood flow restriction (LLRT-BFR) with those of low-intensity resistance training with slow movement and tonic force generation (LST) on the pre- and postoperative quadriceps strength in patients undergoing TKA. Methods In this randomized controlled trial, 22 patients were assigned to either the LLRT-BFR (n=11) or LST (n=11) group. Primary outcomes included changes in quadriceps strength before and after the intervention and surgery. To assess safety, we monitored D-dimer and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels pre- and post-intervention. Statistical analysis involved independent samples t-tests and Mann-Whitney U tests for group comparisons of quadriceps strength changes. Additionally, a two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to assess safety parameters. Results No significant differences were observed between the BFR and LST groups in terms of the rate of increase in quadriceps strength pre- and post-intervention (BFR: median 12.1%, interquartile range -0.8% to 19.5%; LST: median 6.2%, interquartile range 2.7% to 14.7%; p>0.99) or in the rate of reduction in quadriceps strength pre- and post-surgery (BFR: mean -72.4%, standard deviation ±11.2%; LST: mean -75.3%, standard deviation ±12.2%; p=0.57). Safety assessments showed no significant main effects of time, group, or interaction on the safety parameters (all p>0.05). Conclusions LLRT-BFR and LST demonstrated comparable effects on quadriceps strength before and after intervention and surgery in patients undergoing TKA. The lack of significant changes in the safety parameters supports the safety profile of both interventions, indicating their suitability for preoperative conditioning in patients scheduled for TKA.

Feasibility of Low-Load Resistance Training Using Blood Flow Restriction for People With Advanced Multiple Sclerosis: A Prospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of low-load resistance training with blood flow restriction (BFR) for people with advanced disability due to multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 14 participants with MS (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score = 6.0 to 7.0; mean age = 55.4 [SD = 6.2] years; 71% women) were asked to perform 3 lower extremity resistance exercises (leg press, calf press, and hip abduction) bilaterally twice weekly for 8 weeks using BFR. Feasibility criteria were as follows: enrollment of 20 participants, ≥80% retention and adherence, ≥90% satisfaction, and no serious adverse events related to the intervention. Other outcomes included knee extensor, ankle plantar flexor, and hip abductor muscle strength, 30-Second Sit-to-Stand Test, Berg Balance Scale, Timed 25-Foot Walk Test, 12-Item MS Walking Scale, Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, Patient-Specific Functional Scale, and daily step count. RESULTS: Sixteen participants consented, and 14 completed the intervention, with 93% adherence overall. All participants were satisfied with the intervention. A minor hip muscle strain was the only intervention-related adverse event. There were muscle strength improvements on the more-involved (16%-28%) and less-involved (12%-19%) sides. There were also changes in the 30-Second Sit-to-Stand Test (1.9 repetitions; 95% CI = 1.0 to 2.8), Berg Balance Scale (5.3 points; 95% CI = 3.2 to 7.4), Timed 25-Foot Walk Test (-3.3 seconds; 95% CI = -7.9 to 1.3), Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (-8.8 points; 95% CI = -16.5 to -1.1), 12-Item MS Walking Scale (-3.6 points; 95% CI = -11.5 to 4.4), Patient-Specific Functional Scale (2.9 points; 95% CI = 1.9 to 3.8), and daily step count (333 steps; 95% CI = -191 to 857). CONCLUSION: Low-load resistance training using BFR in people with MS and EDSS scores of 6.0 to 7.0 appears feasible, and subsequent investigation into its efficacy is warranted. IMPACT: Although efficacy data are needed, combining BFR with low-load resistance training may be a viable alternative for people who have MS and who do not tolerate conventional moderate- to high-intensity training because of more severe symptoms, such as fatigue and weakness. LAY SUMMARY: Low-load strength training with BFR was feasible in people who have advanced disability due to MS. Using BFR may provide an alternative for people with MS who do not tolerate higher intensity training due to more severe symptoms, such as fatigue and weakness.

Effect of blood-flow restriction exercise on falls and fall related risk factors in older adults 60 years or above: a systematic review.

This systematic review investigated the effect of low-load resistance training combined with blood-flow restriction (LL-BFR) on falls in older adults ≥60 years of age. The databases Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to October 1st, 2019 and reference lists of retrieved publications. Main outcomes were fall rates or proportion of fallers. Additional outcomes were physical performance, lower extremity muscle strength or function, and balance. Mean difference ±SD on falls and fall related outcomes were reported and Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool was used to evaluate quality of evidence. Eight RCT-studies met the inclusion criteria. None reported falls data. Assessing physical performance tests (n=12), 8/12 of the LL-BFR groups showed a significant within-group improvement and 5/12 significant between-group effects comparing LL-BFR to respective controls. For muscle strength tests (n=16), 9/16 showed significant positive within-group improvement and 3/16 significant between-group effects. One study reported data on balance with conflicting results. In conclusion, LL-BFR might increase physical performance and muscle strength in older adults ≥60 years of age. None of the included studies investigated the effect on falls. Larger adequately powered studies are required before introducing LL-BFR as an alternative exercise modality to decrease fall risk.

Comprehensive geriatric intervention program with and without weekly class-style exercise: research protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial in Kyoto-Kameoka Study.

OBJECTIVE: The number of long-term care (LTC) users and the associated expenditures in Japan are increasing dramatically. The national government recommends LTC prevention through activation of communities. However, there is no clear evidence of the effect of population-based comprehensive geriatric intervention program (CGIP) for restraints of LTC users and the associated expenditures in the future. The aims of the current paper are to describe the study protocol and progress of a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a CGIP in Kameoka City. METHODS: The cluster RCT involved random allocation of regions as intervention (n=4,859) and nonintervention (n=7,195). Participants were elderly persons aged ≥65 years without LTC certification who had responded to a mailing survey. The residents living in intervention regions were invited to a physical check-up, and 1,463 people participated (30.3%). These individuals were invited to the CGIP, and 526 accepted. The CGIP comprised instructions on: 1) low-load resistance training using bodyweight, ankle weights, and elastic bands; 2) increasing daily physical activity; 3) oral motor exercise and care; and 4) a well-balanced diet based on a program from Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. We allocated the intervention regions randomly into home-based self-care program alone (HB group, 5 regions, n=275) and home-based program+weekly class-style session (CS group, 5 regions, n=251). We evaluated the effects of the CGIP at 12 weeks and at 12 or 15 months on physical function, and are conducting follow-up data collection for an indefinite period regarding LTC certification, medical costs, and mortality. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The study was launched with good response rates in each phase. Participants of both groups significantly increased their step counts by ~1,000 per day from the baseline during the CGIP. This RCT will provide valuable information and evidence about effectiveness of a community-based CGIP.