Unveiling the chasm of economic burden from metastatic prostate cancer through a nationwide retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical and economic consequences of the progression to castration-resistant status for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in South Korea. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using National Health Insurance claims data from 2013 to 2021. Patients defined as newly diagnosed with mHSPC had an index date of first claim for metastatic PC between 2015 and 2016 and no exposure to CRPC medicines during the washout period. All-cause monthly medical and end-of-life costs were described for mHSPC and mCRPC. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze medical costs, and generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate the correlation between medical costs and significant variables, including disease progression, death, and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 3,739 patients with mHSPC included (mean 72.9 years), 779 progressed to mCRPC. The overall study population underwent a median 60.48-months follow-up period. The average monthly medical cost depending on CRPC progression was 1.5 times in the mCRPC than in the mHSPC group ($1,734.2 vs. $1,185.4). Monthly medical costs for those who progressed to mCRPC were 2.4 times one year after progression than one year before. In all groups, the average total medical costs gradually increased near mortality. Disease progression and death had a significant correlation with medical costs, by 1.7 times and 2.46 times, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the economic and health benefits of preventing progression to castration resistance in patients with mHSPC based on real-world data.

PSMA PET/CT for treatment response evaluation at predefined time points is superior to PSA response for predicting survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: In metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), using serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels to evaluate treatment response is not always accurate. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of PSMA PET/CT at specific time points for evaluating treatment response and predicting survival in mCRPC patients, compared to PSA. METHODS: Sixty mCRPC patients underwent [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT at baseline and for treatment response evaluation of either androgen receptor-targeted agents (after 3 months) or chemotherapy (after completion), and were retrospectively analysed. Visual assessment categorised overall response and response of the worst responding lesion as partial response, stable disease, or progressive disease, using the EAU/EANM criteria. Additionally, percentage changes in SUVmax, total tumour volume and total lesion uptake (tumour volume * SUVmean) were calculated. PSA response was defined according to the PCWG3 criteria. Cox regression analysis identified predictors of overall survival. RESULTS: PSMA PET/CT and PSA response were discordant in 47 % of patients, and PSMA PET/CT response was worse in 89 % of these cases. Overall response on PSMA PET/CT independently predicted overall survival (progression versus non-progression: HR = 4.05, p < 0.001), outperforming PSA response (progression versus non-progression: HR = 2.53, p = 0.010) and other PSMA PET/CT parameters. Among patients with a PSA decline of > 50 %, 31 % showed progressive disease on PSMA PET/CT, correlating with higher mortality risk (progression versus non-progression: HR = 4.38, p = 0.008). No flare in PSMA uptake was observed in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS: PSMA PET/CT for assessing treatment response at predefined time points was superior to PSA-based response for predicting overall survival in mCRPC patients treated with androgen receptor-targeted agents and chemotherapy. PSMA PET/CT showed the ability to detect disease progression earlier than PSA levels, which can affect treatment decisions and has the potential to improve patient outcomes. We recommend further research to validate these findings in larger patient cohorts, to extend the number of treatments, and to evaluate cost-effectiveness and impact on patient outcomes.

Extraordinary therapeutic effect of PSMA radioligand therapy in treatment-refractory progressive metastatic prostate cancer with the transketolase inhibitor benfo-oxythiamine as a radiosensitizer-A case report.

Herein we report, for the first time, the therapeutic response of a prostate cancer patient with the thiamine antagonist benfo-oxythiamine (B-OT) added to prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (PRLT). The patient was initially diagnosed as pT3b pN0 (0/7) M0 L0 V0 R0 G3, Gleason score 5 + 5 = 10, with an initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 4.05 ng/ml. Shortly after radical prostatectomy, 68Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) revealed PSMA-positive lymph node metastases. Despite treatment with androgen deprivation therapy, external beam radiation therapy, palliative chemotherapy, and five cycles of PRLT (177Lu-PRLT or TANDEM-PRLT, respectively), the patient experienced progression in PSA levels as well as in PSMA PET/CT. Due to the intense PSMA expression, 177Lu-PRLT with 177Lu-PSMA-I&T was resumed for another 4 cycles (cycles 6th to 9th) and the patient was additionally treated with the thiamine antagonist benfo-oxythiamine. It was hypothesized that B-OT acts as a radiosensitizer by interfering with the repair of damaged DNA. B-OT-PRLT was well-tolerated and no substantial changes in laboratory results were observed. Additionally, the patient reported significant improvement in clinical symptoms. Post-treatment 177Lu-PSMA single-photon computed tomography (SPECT)/CT after the 7th cycle (and after 2 cycles of B-OT-PRLT) revealed regression of metastases compared to the post-treatment SPECT/CT after the 6th cycle. Before the 8th cycle, PSMA PET/CT showed a mixed response following prior uncontrollable cancer progression. Moreover, the PSA level showed a significant decline after one cycle of B-OT-PRLT. Although the patient had experienced massive progression before the first cycle of B-OT-PRLT, he survived for an additional 12 months. This case supports the hypothesis that B-OT-PRLT could overcome radiation resistance in prostate cancer patients who do not initially respond to 177Lu- or 225Ac-PRLT.

Comparative efficacy and safety of talazoparib plus enzalutamide and other first-line treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Talazoparib plus enzalutamide (TALA + ENZA) has demonstrated antitumor activity in the phase 3 clinical trial (TALAPRO-2; NCT03395197) as first-line (1L) therapy in men with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Although many active interventions are available, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving talazoparib have only been conducted to assess its efficacy and safety compared to enzalutamide. To estimate comparisons between all relevant interventions, indirect comparisons are needed. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the comparative efficacy and safety of TALA + ENZA in 1L patients with mCRPC by conducting a systematic literature review and network meta-analyses (NMAs). METHODS: Databases were searched using Ovid, along with several gray literature sources to identify RCTs evaluating treatments in 1L mCRPC (PROSPERO registration: CRD42021283512). Feasibility assessment evaluated trial suitability for NMA inclusion and Bayesian or frequentist NMAs were conducted for evaluable efficacy and safety outcomes, respectively. RESULTS: Thirty-three RCTs met the eligibility criteria and were feasible for NMAs. Across multiple efficacy outcomes assessed, except for overall survival (OS), TALA + ENZA was ranked the most efficacious treatment. For OS, TALA + ENZA showed the second-highest probability of being the most effective treatment; second to docetaxel 50 mg plus prednisolone 10 mg. With respect to safety outcomes, TALA + ENZA, in general, showed increased rates of hematological adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: TALA + ENZA showed favorable results across multiple efficacy endpoints, but not across hematological toxicities compared with other 1L treatments in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic mCRPC in the all-comers patient population.

Prognostic Outcomes and Predictive Factors in Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Not Treated with Second-Generation Antiandrogens.

Background/Objectives: Patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) and high-risk features frequently have progression to life-threatening metastasis without second-generation antiandrogens. This study investigated nmCRPC patients for the survival and prognostic factors from a cohort before the approved use of second-generation antiandrogens. Methods: From March 2016 to January 2021, 326 patients treated with second-generation antiandrogens for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) or metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer were retrieved. Forty-four patients experiencing nmCRPC with no use of second-generation antiandrogens were reviewed. The prognostic factors, at initial diagnosis or at nmCRPC, associated with metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Results: The median follow-up time after nmCRPC was 46 months. The median PSA level at nmCRPC was 2.7 ng/mL. Thirty-eight of forty-four patients with nmCRPC had a PSA doubling time (PSADT) of 10 months or shorter, and the median PSADT was 4 months. The median OS from nmCRPC was 53 months, and the median interval for nmCRPC patients progressing to mCRPC was 20 months. Upon univariate analysis, PSADT < 10 months (p = 0.049) and the very-high-risk group at the initial diagnosis (p = 0.043) were associated with significantly shorter post-nmCRPC MFS. The very-high-risk group (p = 0.031) was associated with significantly worse post-nmCRPC OS. In terms of survivals from the initial diagnosis of prostate cancer, Gleason grade ≥ 8 was the only independent factor with MFS and OS. Conclusions: Without second-generation antiandrogens, nmCRPC patients with PSADT <10 months and in the initial very-high-risk group developed subsequent mCRPC in a significantly faster fashion. Patients of the very-high-risk group had shorter survival rates after nmCRPC.

Prognostic Role of PSMA-Targeted Imaging in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: An Overview.

OBJECTIVES: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has gained a primary role in prostate cancer (PCa) imaging, overcoming conventional imaging and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serum levels, and has recently emerged as a promising technique for monitoring therapy response in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with novel hormonal therapy, taxanes, and radioligand therapy (RLT). In this review, we aim to provide an overview of the most relevant aspects under study and future prospects related to the prognostic role of PSMA PET/CT in mCRPC. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in the following databases: MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE databases. The study focused exclusively on English-language studies, excluding papers not pertinent to the topic. RESULTS: PSMA PET imaging offers a higher sensitivity and specificity than conventional imaging and provides accurate staging and efficient diagnosis of distant metastases. The data presented herein highlight the usefulness of PET in risk stratification, with a prognostic potential that can have a significant impact on clinical practice. Several prospective trials are ongoing and will shortly provide more evidence supporting the prognostic potential of PET PSMA data in this clinical scenario. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence proves the prognostic role of PSMA PET/CT in different settings, with raising relevance also in the context of mCRPC.

Matched-pair analysis of mCRPC patients receiving 177Lu-labeled PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy in a 4-week versus 6-week treatment interval.

BACKGROUND: The optimal regimen for 177Lu-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted radioligand therapy, including treatment intervals, remains under study, with evidence suggesting shorter intervals could benefit patients with high disease volume and rapid progression. This retrospective analysis evaluated treatment toxicity, PSA response, PSA-progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), and overall survival (OS) in matched cohorts of mCRPC patients receiving 177Lu-PSMA-RLT at 4-week versus 6-week intervals. RESULTS: A PSA response (PSA decline ≥ 50%) was achieved in 47.8% and 21.7% of patients in the 4-week and 6-week treatment interval groups, respectively (p = 0.12). There was a trend towards longer PSA-PFS in the 4-week group compared to the 6-week group (median PSA-PFS, 26.0 weeks vs. 18.0 weeks; HR 0.6; p = 0.2). Although not statistically significant, there was a trend towards shorter OS in the 4-week group compared to the 6-week group (median OS, 15.1 months vs. 18.4 months; HR 1.3; p = 0.5). The 4-week group had a significantly greater decrease in leucocyte and platelet counts compared to the 6-week group (38.5% vs. 18.2% and 26.7% vs. 10.7%; p = 0.047 and p = 0.02). Severe adverse events were modest in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intensifying treatment intervals from 6 weeks to 4 weeks showed some improvements in PSA response and PSA-PFS for mCRPC patients, but did not significantly affect OS. Additionally, bone marrow reserve was significantly reduced with the intensified regimen. Therefore, the overall benefit remains uncertain, and further prospective studies are needed to compare 4-week and 6-week intervals regarding toxicity, treatment response, and outcome.

The Role of CENPK Splice Variant in Abiraterone Response in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Most patients with metastatic prostate cancer eventually develop resistance to primary androgen deprivation therapy. To identify predictive biomarker for Abiraterone acetate/prednisone resistance, we screened alternative splice variants between responders and non-responders from the PROMOTE clinical study and pinned down the most significant variant, CENPK-delta8. Through preclinical patient-derived mouse xenograft (PDX) and 3D organoids obtained from responders and non-responders, as well as in vitro models, aberrant CENPK-delta8 expression was determined to link to drug resistance via enhanced migration and proliferation. The FLNA and FLOT1 were observed to specifically bind to CENK-delta8 rather than wild-type CENPK, underscoring the role of CENPK-delta8 in cytoskeleton organization and cell migration. Our study, leveraging data from the PROMOTE study, TCGA, and TCGA SpliceReq databases, highlights the important function of alternative splice variants in drug response and their potential to be prognostic biomarkers for improving individual therapeutic outcomes in precision medicine.

Enzalutamide versus abiraterone acetate in the development of new-onset or worsening type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: EVADE study.

PURPOSE: To determine new-onset or worsening T2DM risk in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving abiraterone acetate (AA) vs. enzalutamide (ENZA) in England. METHODS: Records of patients on AA and/or ENZA (2015-2021) were analysed retrospectively from UK- or England-wide databases and data sets. The primary endpoint was new-onset or worsening T2DM, analysed using a Cox model. RESULTS: Of 1382 patients, 84 (6.1%) met the primary endpoint; 42 of 826 patients (5.1%) received ENZA and 42 of 556 patients (7.6%) received AA. Among patients without baseline T2DM (n = 1049), 50 developed new-onset T2DM: 24 (3.9%) on ENZA and 26 (5.9%) on AA. Among patients with baseline T2DM (n = 333), 34 (10.2%) had worsening T2DM: 18 (8.3%) on ENZA and 16 (13.8%) on AA. Patients on ENZA had longer median follow-up (445 vs. 408 days) and treatment duration (164 vs. 139 days) than those on AA, who were also more likely to have new-onset or worsening T2DM than those on ENZA (HR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.4-2.7; P = 0.0101). The number needed to harm for an additional patient to experience new-onset or worsening T2DM when receiving AA instead of ENZA was 40 overall, 50 in patients without baseline T2DM, and 18 in patients with baseline T2DM. CONCLUSION: Patients with mCRPC receiving AA were more likely to experience new-onset or worsening T2DM than those on ENZA, despite having a shorter treatment duration. Further research is required to substantiate these findings in earlier disease settings with longer treatment duration.

Novel astatine (211At)-labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand with a neopentyl-glycol structure: evaluation of stability, efficacy, and safety using a prostate cancer xenograft model.

PURPOSE: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted alpha therapy is considered a promising alternative treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Though astatine-211 (211At) is potentially useful alpha-emitter producible by cyclotrons, its clinical application has been limited by instability and a tendency to deastatination in vivo. To overcome these challenges, we developed [211At]At-NpG-PSMA, a novel PSMA ligand with a neopentyl-glycol structure that enhances in vivo stability against deastatination. This study aimed to evaluate the stability, anti-tumour effect, and safety of [211At]At-NpG-PSMA in mice. METHODS: Xenograft models were prepared by subcutaneous transplantation of PSMA-positive PC-3 PIP cells into BALB/c nu/nu mice. [211At]At-NpG-PSMA was administered to assess biodistribution, and the anti-tumour effect was evaluated at doses of 0.32, 1.00 and 1.93 MBq in comparison with saline. Histopathological examinations were performed to evaluate damage to normal organs. RESULTS: [211At]At-NpG-PSMA demonstrated high tumour uptake (42.0 ± 13.1%ID/g at 3 h) with minimal uptake in non-target tissues, including thyroid, stomach and salivary grands (0.28 ± 0.20%ID, 0.71 ± 0.12%ID/g and 0.88 ± 0.10%ID/g at 3 h, respectively). A dose-dependent anti-tumour effect was observed, with tumour volumes increasing by 796.0 ± 437.6% in the control versus 161.0 ± 213.4%, -76.4 ± 19.2% and - 59.5 ± 41.6% in the 0.32, 1.00 and 1.93 MBq groups, respectively, by day 15. Mild renal tubule regeneration was noted in the 1.00 MBq group. CONCLUSION: [211At]At-NpG-PSMA demonstrated significant stability in vivo and anti-tumour effects with minimal side effects, indicating its potential as a new therapeutic drug for PSMA-targeted alpha therapy in mCRPC.

The prognostic superiority of second-generation androgen receptor signaling inhibitor in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare prognostic outcomes of administering first- or second-generation androgen receptor signaling inhibitors in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and to find prognostic indicators. METHODS: This retrospective study included 198 patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer from 14 institutions associated with Tokai Urologic Oncology Research Seminar. Forty-two patients were treated with combined androgen blockade using first-generation inhibitors (bicalutamide or flutamide), and 156 were treated with second-generation inhibitors (abiraterone/enzalutamide or apalutamide/darolutamide) after primary androgen deprivation therapy failure. We compared survival outcomes of combined androgen blockade using first-generation inhibitors and second-generation inhibitor treatments, and analyzed clinicopathological or serum parameters and survival outcome. RESULTS: Combined androgen blockade and second-generation androgen receptor signaling inhibitor groups demonstrated median progression-free survival of 10.2 (95% confidence interval: 5.5-12.3) and 26.0 (95% confidence interval: 21.9-38.4; P < 0.001) months, respectively. Cut-off levels for clinical biomarkers were targeted to <0.2 ng/ml prostate-specific antigen levels 3 months after treatment initiation for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; the patient group that achieved this showed better progression-free survival (median 14.7 months, 95% confidence interval: 10.3-23.9 not achieved, median not applicable, 95% confidence interval: 24.6-not applicable achieved; P < 0.00001). Multivariate analysis revealed significant prognostic factors: second-generation androgen receptor signaling inhibitor as first-line treatment (odds ratio: 5.05, 95% confidence interval: 1.54-16.6) and a high hemoglobin level (odds ratio: 2.92, 95% confidence interval: 1.26-6.76). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested prostate-specific antigen < 0.2 ng/ml after 3 months may be a practical prognostic indicator of survival outcomes in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Patients showing a high hemoglobin level should be intensively treated with second-generation androgen receptor signaling inhibitors rather than combined androgen blockade using first-generation inhibitors.

Description of FDG and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT Findings in Korean Patients With Advanced Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT findings in Korean men with advanced metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The results of paired FDG and PSMA PET/CT examinations performed in 42 consecutive men with prostate cancer for treatment planning after failure of anti-androgen therapy and chemotherapy were studied. Tumor lesions with FDG or PSMA uptake intensity higher than that of the liver on visual review were considered positive and noted per patient and tumor site (prostate bed, lymph node, bone, and visceral organ). The presence of unequivocally discordant FDG and PSMA uptake patterns in tumor lesions was assessed. Patients were grouped according to the total tumor volume as seen on each PET/CT scan, and the clinical findings between the patient groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: On patient-based analysis, the image findings were PSMA+/FDG- in 2 patients, PSMA-/FDG+ in one, and PSMA+/FDG+ in 39 patients. On site-based analysis, the discordance (PSMA+/FDG- or PSMA-/FDG+) rate was 9.5% (4/42) for prostate/bed, 11.9% (5/42) for lymph nodes, 9.5% (4/42) for bones, and 11.9% (5/42) for visceral organs. FDG uptake was higher than PSMA uptake in at least one tumor site in 54.8% (23/42) of patients. Patients with greater total tumor volume on FDG PET/CT than that on PSMA PET/CT ("FDG-dominant pattern") accounted for 28.6% (12/42), and they had significantly shorter time from diagnosis (median 25 months vs. 62 months, P = 0.049), and higher aspartate aminotransferase (median 28.5 vs. 22.5, P = 0.027) and lactate dehydrogenase (median 341.5 vs. 224.5, P = 0.010) levels. CONCLUSION: Most patients with advanced mCRPC had tumors with positive findings on both FDG and PSMA PET/CT. However, the uptake patterns varied; 54.8% of the patients had tumor(s) with FDG uptake greater than PSMA uptake, and FDG-dominant pattern was noted in 28.6% of the patients.

Dysphasia: metastatic prostate cancer to the leptomeninges: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Leptomeningeal metastasis occurs in 5% of patients with prostate cancer and indicates a very poor prognosis. CASE PRESENTATION: A 60-year-old Caucasian male patient diagnosed with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with sclerotic bone metastases and soft tissue metastases underwent multiple courses of chemotherapy and hormone therapy. The diagnosis of prostate cancer is based on elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and tissue biopsy. He subsequently presented with expressive aphasia. Nonspecific, diffuse irregular dural/pachymeningeal thickening enhancement was noted on magnetic resonance imaging. Upon evaluation by neurology, electroencephalogram was negative for an epileptiform correlate. The workup included a lumbar puncture to rule out infectious etiology. The patient's neurological status stabilized, and he was discharged home with a plan for continued therapy with abiraterone and prednisone. Due to advanced malignancy, the patient enrolled in hospice and died 3 weeks after hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Central nervous system metastasis occurs very rarely in prostate cancer. With the increase in life expectancy and advances in oncologic therapy for prostate cancer, physicians should be aware of and consider central nervous system metastasis in men aged 50 years and above.

Best Patient Care Practices for Administering PSMA-Targeted Radiopharmaceutical Therapy.

Optimal patient management protocols for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are poorly defined and even further complexified with new therapy approvals, such as radiopharmaceuticals. The prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted agent 177Lu vipivotide tetraxetan ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617), approved after the phase III VISION study, presents physicians with additional aspects of patient management, including specific adverse event (AE) monitoring and management, as well as radiation safety. Drawing on our experience as VISION study investigators, here we provide guidance on best practices for delivering PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) to patients with mCRPC. After a comprehensive review of published evidence and guidelines on RPT management in prostate cancer, we identified educational gaps in managing the radiation safety and AEs associated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. Our results showed that providing sufficient education on AEs (e.g., fatigue and dry mouth) and radiation safety principles is key to effective delivery and management of patient expectations. Patient counseling by health care professionals, across disciplines, is a cornerstone of optimal patient management during PSMA-targeted RPT. Multidisciplinary collaboration is crucial, and physicians must adhere to radiation safety protocols and counsel patients on radiation safety considerations. Treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 is generally well tolerated; however, additional interventions may be required, such as dosing modification, medications, or transfusions. Urinary incontinence can be challenging in the context of radiation safety. Multidisciplinary collaboration between medical oncologists and nuclear medicine teams ensures that patients are monitored and managed safely and efficiently. In clinical practice, the benefit-to-risk ratio should always be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Outcomes for Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer and Liver Metastasis Receiving [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617.

It is well known that patients with liver metastasis from metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer have poor or only transient responses to many forms of systemic therapy. Data on outcomes after treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (LuPSMA) are scarce. The VISION trial reports a hazard ratio for overall survival (OS) in the subgroup of patients with liver metastasis without disclosing the absolute duration of survival. Using real-world clinical data, we examined this important subgroup of patients, describing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and OS. Methods: A single-institution database was assembled to include all patients receiving LuPSMA at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, for whom treatment was initiated between March 2022 and March 2023. Baseline clinicopathologic and imaging characteristics were abstracted. Patients were then categorized by presence or absence of liver metastasis on pretreatment prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET. PSA response and OS for the 2 groups (liver metastasis vs. no liver metastasis) were compared using χ2 testing and the Kaplan-Meier method, respectively. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed, including established prognostic factors. Finally, those with pretreatment circulating tumor DNA as determined in an 83-gene panel were assessed for the presence of pathogenic and likely pathogenic alterations. These findings were summarized using descriptive statistics and compared between the 2 cohorts using the Fisher exact test. Results: The overall cohort consisted of 273 patients, including 43 (15.75%) with liver metastasis on pretreatment PSMA PET/CT. The median number of cycles received was 3 (range, 1-6) for patients with liver metastasis and 5 (range, 1-6) for those without hepatic involvement. The 50% or greater reduction in PSA from baseline response rate was lower for those with liver metastasis than for those without (30.23% [13/43] vs 49.77% [106/213], P = 0.019). At a median follow-up of 10 mo (interquartile range, 9-13 mo), there was a significant difference in median OS (8.35 mo vs. not reached, P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, the presence of liver metastasis was independently associated with shorter survival (hazard ratio, 4.06; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Our data suggest that the presence of liver metastasis predicts poorer outcomes in patients receiving LuPSMA treatment. Alternative and combination approaches should be explored to maximize the antitumor activity of radiopharmaceutical therapy in the liver.

Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib Plus Abiraterone Versus Placebo Plus Abiraterone in the First-line Treatment of Patients with Asymptomatic/Mildly Symptomatic and Symptomatic Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Analyses from the Phase 3 PROpel Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In PROpel (NCT03732820), olaparib + abiraterone resulted in a statistically significant radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) benefit and numerically prolonged overall survival (OS) versus placebo + abiraterone in first-line (1L) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. Here, we report post hoc exploratory subgroup analyses in patients with asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic or symptomatic disease at baseline. METHODS: Patients were randomised 1:1 to olaparib (300 mg b.i.d.) or placebo with abiraterone (1000 mg o.d.) + prednisone/prednisolone (5 mg b.i.d.). For this post hoc exploratory analysis, patients with a Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) item 3 score of <4 and no opiate use were classified as asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic; those with a BPI-SF item 3 score of ≥4 and/or opiate use were classified as symptomatic. Subgroup analyses included investigator-assessed rPFS, OS, objective response rate, time to second progression or death, health-related quality of life, and safety. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: The median rPFS in asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic patients (n = 560) was 27.6 mo for olaparib + abiraterone versus 19.1 mo for placebo + abiraterone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-0.76). For symptomatic patients (n = 183), equivalent values were 14.1 versus 13.8 mo (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.54-1.13). At the final planned OS analysis, the median OS in asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic patients was not reached for olaparib + abiraterone versus 39.5 mo for placebo + abiraterone (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.59-1.00). For symptomatic patients, equivalent values were 22.9 versus 22.8 mo (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.58-1.16). Other outcomes showed no meaningful differences between the subgroups. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Olaparib + abiraterone provided efficacy benefits in 1L mCRPC patients with either asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic or symptomatic disease. A larger benefit occurred in asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic patients. PATIENT SUMMARY: PROpel, a phase 3 clinical trial, looked at whether combining olaparib with abiraterone delays the progression of patients' cancer compared with placebo plus abiraterone. Patients with or without pain symptoms associated with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer were eligible for enrolment into the trial. Results showed that olaparib plus abiraterone reduced the risk of disease progression and death, with a larger benefit observed in patients without or with mild pain symptoms than in those with pain symptoms.

Patient-reported Outcomes for Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer and BRCA1/2 Gene Alterations: Final Analysis from the Randomized Phase 3 MAGNITUDE Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The phase 3 MAGNITUDE trial assessed the efficacy and safety of niraparib 200 mg and abiraterone acetate 1000 mg plus prednisone 10 mg (AAP) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and alterations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes. Here we report final analysis results for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the HRR+ cohort with a focus on BRCA1/2 alterations (BRCA+). METHODS: Protocol-specified endpoints evaluated patient-reported symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and tolerability (side-effect bother) using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P), and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. Evaluations were completed on day 1 of designated treatment cycles and during follow-up. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: All patients with BRCA+ mCRPC (n = 225) were included in the PRO analyses with average on-treatment PRO compliance >80% when completed on-site. Time to deterioration in pain according to BPI-SF and FACT-P scores did not significantly differ between niraparib + AAP and placebo + AAP. During treatment, EQ-5D-5L revealed no clinically meaningful differences in overall HRQoL between treatment arms in the BRCA+ subgroup. Finally, tolerability was similar between arms; side effect bother rated as "not at all" or "a little bit" ranged from 79.8% to 95.9% during treatment. Limitations include a sample size that may not have been powered to detect a difference in PROs. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Treatment with niraparib + AAP maintained HRQoL with minimal side-effect bother reported by most patients with BRCA+ mCRPC. Differences between treatment groups in time to pain deterioration did not meet conventional levels of statistical significance. The MAGNITUDE trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03748641.

A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of the Efficacy, Toxicity, and Quality of Life Outcomes Following Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Radioligand Therapy Utilising Lutetium-177 and Actinium-225 in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Management of metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) presents significant challenges. In this systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression, the efficacy, safety, and quality of life (QoL) outcomes of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (PRLT) utilising lutetium-177 ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA) and actinium-225 ([225Ac]Ac-PSMA) were assessed. METHODS: A detailed literature search across PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was conducted, culminating in the inclusion of 100 studies involving 8711 patients. Data on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses, toxicity profiles, and QoL and survival outcomes were analysed. Proportional meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses were performed. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: The estimated proportion of patients with PSA decline ≥50% was 0.49 for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA and 0.60 for [225Ac]Ac-PSMA in mPCa, particularly metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. A meta-regression analysis indicated an association between the cumulative amount of administered activity and the proportion of PSA ≥50% decline. Positive PSA responses were observed alongside improved overall survival across both therapies. Our analyses also identified the key factors associated with PSA responses and survival outcomes, including baseline haemoglobin level, and the presence of visceral metastases. Although anaemia was commonly observed, with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA, severe toxicities were infrequent. Improved QoL was observed following [177Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy, whereas it remained stable following the second cycle of [225Ac]Ac-PSMA treatment. Heterogeneity across studies for PSA responses and toxicity profiles is a limitation. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Our findings suggest an association between PRLT and reductions in PSA levels, as well as associations with enhanced survival outcomes in mPCa. Furthermore, our analysis shows a low incidence of severe toxicity associated with this treatment. These observations highlight the important role of PRLT in the management of mPCa.

Pretherapeutic PSMA PET-Derived Semiquantitative Parameters as Predictors of PSA Response in Patients with mCRPC Receiving [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy.

Objective [ 177 Lu]Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-617 radioligand therapy (RLT) shows promise for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with positive PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Identifying high-risk patients is crucial. We evaluated pretherapeutic PSMA PET-derived parameters to predict prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response in patients undergoing [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RLT. Materials and Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis among 27 patients (mean age: 71.0 ± 9.5 years; range: 52-85 years) who underwent PSMA PET/computed tomography (CT) and subsequent [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RLT between March 2019 and January 2023. After excluding patients with liver metastases, the number of patients left for analysis was 21 (14 responders and 7 nonresponders). Tumors were semiautomatically delineated with calculation of total tumor volume (PSMA-TV), lesion uptake (PSMA-TLU = PSMA-TV * standardized uptake value [SUV]mean), and lesion quotient (PSMA-TLQ = PSMA-TV/SUVmean) for each patient. Semiquantitative parameters were analyzed only in patients with mCRPC and no liver metastasis. Results In total, 17/27 patients (62.96%) had a decline in PSA levels; 15/27 patients (55.56%) experienced a decline of > 50%. Pretherapeutic PSMA PET/CT results revealed significant differences in PSMA-TV ( p = 0.003), PSMA-TLU ( p = 0.013), and PSMA-TLQ ( p = 0.011) between responders and nonresponders. SUVmax was significantly correlated to the best percentage change in PSA response after 177 Lu-PSMA-617 treatment ( r = -0.79, p = 0.006). No association was observed between PSMA-TV ( p = 0.367), PSMA-TLU ( p = 0.128), and PSMA-TLQ ( p = 0.556), with the best percentage change in PSA response after 177 Lu-PSMA-617 therapy. Conclusion Pretherapeutic PSMA PET-derived PSMA-TV, PSMA-TLU, and PSMA-TLQ were significant negative predictors of PSA response in patients with mCRPC and no liver metastasis receiving [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RLT.

Effect of concomitant medications on treatment response and survival in non-metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer: Exploratory analysis of the SPARTAN trial.

BACKGROUND: We performed an exploratory analysis of the SPARTAN trial to determine whether concomitant exposure to several classes of commonly prescribed medications influenced the effect of apalutamide on overall survival (OS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: SPARTAN was a phase III randomized controlled trial in which nmCRPC patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive androgen deprivation therapy with or without apalutamide. We focused on 5 commonly prescribed classes of medications: metformin, statins, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), and proton pump inhibitors (PPI) based on a plausible biological and clinical rationale. To determine the potential effect modification, we applied multivariable Cox regression models for OS and MFS separately with additional interaction terms. To determine the independent association of concomitant medications with OS and MFS, we used IPTW-based log-rank test. A 2-sided p < 0.01 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: We did not find statistically significant differences in effect from apalutamide on OS across subgroups stratified by concomitant exposure to any of the medication classes. While there was some difference in the treatment effect from apalutamide on MFS between patients with concomitant statins (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.20; 95 % CI: 0.15-0.28) versus without concomitant statins (aHR: 0.31 [0.24-0.39]), this did not reach the pre-specified threshold of statistical significance (p = 0.011). On IPTW-based analysis, patients treated concomitantly with metformin (median: not reached versus 31 months; p = 0.002), or ACEI (median: 37 versus 29 months, p = 0.006) had significantly improved MFS. CONCLUSIONS: In this post-hoc exploratory analysis of SPARTAN, effects of apalutamide on MFS and OS were consistent across subgroups stratified by exposure to concomitant medications. Exposure to concomitant metformin and ACEI was independently associated with a significant improvement in MFS.