Deferral of Treatment for Small Choroidal Melanoma and the Risk of Metastasis: An Investigation Using the Liverpool Uveal Melanoma Prognosticator Online (LUMPO).

BACKGROUND: We estimated metastatic-death risk when the treatment of small choroidal melanomas is deferred until growth is observed. METHODS: In 24 patients with choroidal melanoma (median diameter 5.85 mm), the exponential growth rate estimated by a mixed-effects model was 4.3% per year. Using the Liverpool Uveal Melanoma Prognosticator Online v.3 (LUMPO3), we measured changes in 15-year metastatic and non-metastatic death risks according to whether the tumor is treated immediately or after observing growth 4 or 12 months later, considering age, sex, and metastasis predictors. RESULTS: In 40-year-old females with 10 mm, disomy 3 and monosomy 3 choroidal melanomas (prevalence 16%), the 15-year absolute risks of metastatic death are 4.2% and 76.6%, respectively, increasing after a 4-month delay by 0.0% and 0.2% and by 3.0% and 2.3% with tumor growth rates of 5.0% and 20.0%, respectively. With 12-month delays, these risks increase by 0.0% and 0.5% and by 1.0% and 7.1%, respectively. Increases in metastatic-death risk are less with smaller tumors and with a higher risk of non-metastatic death. CONCLUSIONS: Deferring treatment of choroidal melanomas until documentation of growth may delay iatrogenic visual loss by months or years and is associated with minimal increase in metastatic mortality, at least with small tumors with usual growth rates of up to 40% per year.

Interpreting Discordant Monosomy 3 FISH and Chromosomal Microarray Analysis Results in Uveal Melanoma.

Uveal melanoma is the most common primary ocular tumor in adults and causes morbidity through lymphovascular metastasis. The presence of monosomy 3 in uveal melanomas is one of the most important prognostic indicators for metastasis. Two major molecular pathology testing modalities used to assess monosomy 3 are fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). Here, we report two cases of discordant monosomy 3 test results in uveal melanoma enucleation specimens, performed using these molecular pathology tests. The first case is of uveal melanoma from a 51-year-old male that showed no evidence of monosomy 3 when assessed by CMA, but where it was subsequently detected by FISH. The second case is of uveal melanoma from a 49-year-old male that showed monosomy 3 at the limit of detection when assessed by CMA, but where it was not detected by subsequent FISH analysis. These two cases underscore the potential benefits of each testing modality for monosomy 3. Mainly, while CMA may be more sensitive to low levels of monosomy 3, FISH may be best method for small tumors with high levels of adjacent normal ocular tissue. Our cases suggest that both testing methods should be pursued for uveal melanoma, with a single positive result for either test interpreted as indicating the presence of monosomy 3.

A prognostic classification system for uveal melanoma based on a combination of patient age and sex, the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Cancer Genome Atlas models.

PURPOSE: To revisit the independent importance of ciliary body involvement (CBI), monosomy 3 (M3), tumour size, histological and clinical factors in uveal melanoma (UM) and to devise a new prognostic classification based on a combination of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) models. METHODS: Two cohorts with a total of 1796 patients were included. Clinicopathological factors were compared between patients with and without CBI and M3. Development of the prognostic classification was performed in a training cohort and was then tested in two independent validation cohorts. RESULTS: Tumours with CBI were more common in women, had greater apical thickness, greater basal tumour diameter, greater rates of vasculogenic mimicry and greater rates of M3, were more often asymptomatic at diagnosis and had poorer 5- and 10-year globe conservation rates (p < 0.023). In multivariate logistic regression, patient age at diagnosis, tumour diameter and CBI were independent predictors of M3 (p < 0.001). In multivariate Cox regression, male sex, age at diagnosis, tumour diameter, M3 and CBI were independent predictors of metastasis. The proposed prognostic classification combined patient age, sex, CBI, extraocular extension, M3, 8q (optional) and tumour size, and demonstrated greater prognostic acumen than both AJCC 4 T categories and TCGA groups A to D in validation cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Tumour size does not confound the prognostic implication of CBI, M3, male sex and age at diagnosis in UM. These factors were included in a new prognostic classification that outperforms AJCC T category and TCGA groups.

Correlation between BAP1 Localization, Driver Mutations, and Patient Survival in Uveal Melanoma.

Uveal melanoma (UM) is an uncommon but highly aggressive ocular malignancy. Poor overall survival is associated with deleterious BAP1 alterations, which frequently occur with monosomy 3 (LOH3) and a characteristic gene expression profile. Tumor DNA from a cohort of 100 UM patients from Moorfields Biobank (UK) that had undergone enucleation were sequenced for known UM driver genes (BAP1, SF3B1, EIF1AX, GNAQ, and GNA11). Immunohistochemical staining of BAP1 and interphase FISH for chromosomes 3 and 8 was performed, and cellular localization of BAP1 was correlated with BAP1 mutations. Wildtype (WT) BAP1 staining was characterized by nBAP1 expression with <10% cytoplasmic BAP1 (cBAP1). Tumors exhibited heterogeneity with respect to BAP1 staining with different percentages of nBAP1 loss: ≥25% loss of nuclear BAP1 (nBAP1) was superior to chr8q and LOH3 as a prognostic indicator. Of the successfully sequenced UMs, 38% harbored oncogenic mutations in GNA11 and 48% harbored mutations in GNAQ at residues 209 or 183. Of the secondary drivers, 39% of mutations were in BAP1, 11% were in EIF1AX, and 20% were in the SF3B1 R625 hotspot. Most tumors with SF3B1 or EIF1AX mutations retained nuclear BAP1 (nBAP1). The majority of tumor samples with likely pathogenic BAP1 mutations, regardless of mutation class, displayed ≥25% loss of nBAP1. This included all tumors with truncating mutations and 80% of tumors with missense mutations. In addition, 60% of tumors with truncating mutations and 82% of tumors with missense mutations expressed >10% cBAP1.

Aggressive uveal melanoma displays a high degree of centrosome amplification, opening the door to therapeutic intervention.

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular cancer in adults. Whilst treatment of primary UM (PUM) is often successful, around 50% of patients develop metastatic disease with poor outcomes, linked to chromosome 3 loss (monosomy 3, M3). Advances in understanding UM cell biology may indicate new therapeutic options. We report that UM exhibits centrosome abnormalities, which in other cancers are associated with increased invasiveness and worse prognosis, but also represent a potential Achilles' heel for cancer-specific therapeutics. Analysis of 75 PUM patient samples revealed both higher centrosome numbers and an increase in centrosomes with enlarged pericentriolar matrix (PCM) compared to surrounding normal tissue, both indicative of centrosome amplification. The PCM phenotype was significantly associated with M3 (t-test, p < 0.01). Centrosomes naturally enlarge as cells approach mitosis; however, whilst UM with higher mitotic scores had enlarged PCM regardless of genetic status, the PCM phenotype remained significantly associated with M3 in UM with low mitotic scores (ANOVA, p = 0.021) suggesting that this is independent of proliferation. Phenotypic analysis of patient-derived cultures and established UM lines revealed comparable levels of centrosome amplification in PUM cells to archetypal triple-negative breast cancer cell lines, whilst metastatic UM (MUM) cell lines had even higher levels. Importantly, many UM cells also exhibit centrosome clustering, a common strategy employed by other cancer cells with centrosome amplification to survive cell division. As UM samples with M3 display centrosome abnormalities indicative of amplification, this phenotype may contribute to the development of MUM, suggesting that centrosome de-clustering drugs may provide a novel therapeutic approach.

BAP1 Immunostain Status in Intraocular Biopsy Specimens for Uveal Melanoma Highly Correlates with Other Prognostic Markers.

Introduction: Loss of BAP1 protein expression emerged as a negative prognostic marker in uveal melanoma (UM) and has primarily been studied in enucleations. Intraocular biopsy is frequently performed prior to UM globe-conserving therapy. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated BAP1 immunostaining of UM in 16 biopsies and 8 subsequent enucleations, and results were correlated with the UM-specific gene expression profile (GEP; n = 11), chromosome 3 status by FISH and/or chromosomal microarray (n = 12; 9 also had GEP), and clinical outcomes. Results: UM involved the choroid in 15 (of 16) cases. Biopsy was performed for prognostication (n = 12) or diagnosis (n = 4). Treatment included brachytherapy (n = 13; 5 followed by enucleation) or enucleation only (n = 3). BAP1 nuclear immunostaining was positive in 9, negative in 4, and equivocal in 3 biopsies. For the 3 equivocal biopsies, BAP1 immunostaining was positive in 2 (of 3) subsequent enucleations. BAP1 immunostaining was concordant between all 5 remaining biopsies and enucleations. BAP1-positive biopsies had disomy 3 (n = 6) or 3p loss (n = 1) and class 1 GEP (n = 6). BAP1-negative biopsies had monosomy 3 (n = 3) and class 2 GEP (n = 2). Median follow-up was 62.5 months (range, 17-150). For BAP1-positive UM patients, 8 were alive (7 without metastatic disease) and 3 had died (1 melanoma-related death). Among BAP1-negative UM patients, 2 were alive (1 with metastatic disease) and 3 had melanoma-related deaths. Conclusion: BAP1 immunostaining in biopsies highly correlates with results in subsequent enucleations and with well-established UM prognostic markers, representing a potential additional prognostic tool for UM biopsies.

Partial Trisomy 13q/Monosomy 3p Resulting from a Paternal Reciprocal 3p;13q Translocation in a Boy with Facial Dysmorphism and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Individuals with 3p deletion show a great clinical variability. Apparently, a 1.5-Mb terminal deletion, including the CRBN and CNTN4 genes, is sufficient to cause this syndrome. Partial trisomy 13q is a rare chromosomal abnormality with a variable phenotypic expression, but in most cases, patients have a phenotype resembling complete trisomy 13. The aim of the present study is to describe a 9-month-old Mexican male patient with 3p deletion/13q duplication and a novel clinical finding. He presented with facial dysmorphism and multiple congenital alterations. Echocardiogram revealed cardiac insufficiency with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and pulmonary hypertension, not previously reported. Karyotype from the patient and his father were 46,XY,add(3)(p26) and 46,XY,t(3;13), respectively. Microarray assay of the proband exhibited an approximately 2.6-Mb loss at terminal 3p26.3 and a 27.7-Mb gain of the long arm in terminal chromosome 13 at q31.1q34. A chromosomal imbalance with a partial trisomy 13q31.1q34 and monosomy 3p26.3 of paternal origin were detected. Microarray assay of both parents were normal. The proband has a cardiomyopathy not previously reported. These data enrich the spectrum of clinical manifestations in 3p deletion/3q duplication chromosomopathy.

KIT Expression Is Regulated by DNA Methylation in Uveal Melanoma Tumors.

Uveal melanoma (UM) is an ocular tumor with a dismal prognosis. Despite the availability of precise molecular and cytogenetic techniques, clinicopathologic features with limited accuracy are widely used to predict metastatic potential. In 51 UM tissues, we assessed a correlation between the expression of nine proteins evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) (Melan-A, S100, HMB45, Cyclin D1, Ki-67, p53, KIT, BCL2, and AIFM1) and the presence of UM-specific chromosomal rearrangements measured by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), to find IHC markers with increased prognostic information. Furthermore, mRNA expression and DNA methylation values were extracted from the whole-genome data, achieved by analyzing 22 fresh frozen UM tissues. KIT positivity was associated with monosomy 3, increasing the risk of poor prognosis more than 17-fold (95% CI 1.53-198.69, p = 0.021). A strong negative correlation was identified between mRNA expression and DNA methylation values for 12 of 20 analyzed positions, five located in regulatory regions of the KIT gene (r = -0.658, p = 0.001; r = -0.662, p = 0.001; r = -0.816; p < 0.001; r = -0.689, p = 0.001; r = -0.809, p < 0.001, respectively). DNA methylation ß values were also inversely associated with KIT protein expression (p = 0.001; p = 0.001; p = 0.015; p = 0.025; p = 0.002). Our findings, showing epigenetic deregulation of KIT expression, may contribute to understanding the past failure to therapeutically target KIT in UM.

MiRNAs Correlate with HLA Expression in Uveal Melanoma: Both Up- and Downregulation Are Related to Monosomy 3.

MicroRNAs are known to play a role in the regulation of inflammation. As a high HLA Class I expression is associated with a bad prognosis in UM, we set out to determine whether any miRNAs were related to a high HLA Class I expression and inflammation. We also determined whether such miRNAs were related to the UM's genetic status. The expression of 125 miRNAs was determined in 64 primary UM from Leiden. Similarly, the mRNA expression of HLA-A, HLA-B, TAP1, BAP1, and immune cell markers was obtained. Expression levels of 24 of the 125 miRNAs correlated with expression of at least three out of four HLA Class I probes. Four miRNAs showed a positive correlation with HLA expression and infiltration with leukocytes, 20 a negative pattern. In the first group, high miRNA levels correlated with chromosome 3 loss/reduced BAP1 mRNA expression, in the second group low miRNA levels. The positive associations between miRNA-22 and miRNA-155 with HLA Class I were confirmed in the TCGA study and Rotterdam cohort, and with TAP1 in the Rotterdam data set; the negative associations between miRNA-125b2 and miRNA-211 and HLA-A, TAP1, and CD4 were confirmed in the Rotterdam set. We demonstrate two patterns: miRNAs can either be related to a high or a low HLA Class I/TAP1 expression and the presence of infiltrating lymphocytes and macrophages. However, both patterns were associated with chromosome 3/BAP1 status, which suggests a role for BAP1 loss in the regulation of HLA expression and inflammation in UM through miRNAs.

Monosomy 3 Is Linked to Resistance to MEK Inhibitors in Uveal Melanoma.

The use of MEK inhibitors in the therapy of uveal melanoma (UM) has been investigated widely but has failed to show benefits in clinical trials due to fast acquisition of resistance. In this study, we investigated a variety of therapeutic compounds in primary-derived uveal melanoma cell lines and found monosomy of chromosome 3 (M3) and mutations in BAP1 to be associated with higher resistance to MEK inhibition. However, reconstitution of BAP1 in a BAP1-deficient UM cell line was unable to restore sensitivity to MEK inhibition. We then compared UM tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) with mutations in BAP1 with tumors with wild-type BAP1. Principal component analysis (PCA) clearly differentiated both groups of tumors, which displayed disparate overall and progression-free survival data. Further analysis provided insight into differential expression of genes involved in signaling pathways, suggesting that the downregulation of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2A (EIF2A) observed in UM tumors with BAP1 mutations and M3 UM cell lines might lead to a decrease in ribosome biogenesis while inducing an adaptive response to stress. Taken together, our study links loss of chromosome 3 with decreased sensitivity to MEK inhibition and gives insight into possible related mechanisms, whose understanding is fundamental to overcome resistance in this aggressive tumor.

Small High-Risk Uveal Melanomas Have a Lower Mortality Rate.

Our aim was to determine whether size impacts on the difference in metastatic mortality of genetically high-risk (monosomy 3) uveal melanomas (UM). We undertook a retrospective analysis of data from a patient cohort with genetically characterized UM. All patients treated for UM in the Liverpool Ocular Oncology Centre between 2007 and 2014, who had a prognostic genetic tumor analysis. Patients were subdivided into those with small (≤2.5 mm thickness) and large (>2.5 mm thickness) tumors. Survival analyses were performed using Gray rank statistics to calculate absolute probabilities of dying as a result of metastatic UM. The 5-year absolute risk of metastatic mortality of those with small monosomy 3 UM was significantly lower (23%) compared to the larger tumor group (50%) (p = 0.003). Small disomy 3 UM also had a lower absolute risk of metastatic mortality (0.8%) than large disomy 3 UM (6.4%) (p = 0.007). Hazard rates showed similar differences even with lead time bias correction estimates. We therefore conclude that earlier treatment of all small UM, particularly monosomy 3 UM, reduces the risk of metastatic disease and death. Our results would support molecular studies of even small UM, rather than 'watch-and-wait strategies'.

Monosomy-3 Alters the Expression Profile of the Glucose Transporters GLUT1-3 in Uveal Melanoma.

Monosomy-3 in uveal melanoma (UM) cells increases the risk of fatal metastases. The gene encoding the low-affinity glucose transporter GLUT2 resides on chromosome 3q26.2. Here, we analyzed the expression of the glucose transporters GLUT1, GLUT2, and GLUT3 with regard to the histological and clinical factors by performing immunohistochemistry on the primary tumors of n = 33 UM patients. UMs with monosomy-3 exhibited a 57% lower immunoreactivity for GLUT2 and a 1.8×-fold higher ratio of GLUT1 to total GLUT1-3. The combined levels of GLUT1-3 proteins were reduced in the irradiated but not the non-irradiated tumors with monosomy-3. GLUT3 expression was stronger in the irradiated samples with disomy-3 versus monosomy-3, but the ratio of the GLUT3 isoform to total GLUT1-3 did not differ with regard to the monosomy-3 status in the irradiated or non-irradiated subgroups. Systemic metastases were associated with the presence of monosomy-3 in the primary and circulating tumor cells as well as a higher GLUT1 ratio. Upregulation of the high-affinity glucose transporter GLUT1 possibly as a compensation for the low-affinity isoform GLUT2 may be enhancing the basal glucose uptake in the UM cells with monosomy-3. Prevention of hyperglycemia might, therefore, be a valuable approach to delay the lethal UM metastases.

Metastasis of Uveal Melanoma with Monosomy-3 Is Associated with a Less Glycogenetic Gene Expression Profile and the Dysregulation of Glycogen Storage.

The prolonged storage of glucose as glycogen can promote the quiescence of tumor cells, whereas the accumulation of an aberrant form of glycogen without the primer protein glycogenin can induce the metabolic switch towards a glycolytic phenotype. Here, we analyzed the expression of n = 67 genes involved in glycogen metabolism on the uveal melanoma (UM) cohort of the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) study and validated the differentially expressed genes in an independent cohort. We also evaluated the glycogen levels with regard to the prognostic factors via a differential periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining. UMs with monosomy-3 exhibited a less glycogenetic and more insulin-resistant gene expression profile, together with the reduction of glycogen levels, which were associated with the metastases. Expression of glycogenin-1 (Locus: 3q24) was lower in the monosomy-3 tumors, whereas the complementary isoform glycogenin-2 (Locus: Xp22.33) was upregulated in females. Remarkably, glycogen was more abundant in the monosomy-3 tumors of male versus female patients. We therefore provide the first evidence to the dysregulation of glycogen metabolism as a novel factor that may be aggravating the course of UM particularly in males.

Neuronal migration genes and a familial translocation t (3;17): candidate genes implicated in the phenotype.

BACKGROUND: While Miller-Dieker syndrome critical region deletions are well known delineated anomalies, submicroscopic duplications in this region have recently emerged as a new distinctive syndrome. So far, only few cases have been described overlapping 17p13.3 duplications. METHODS: In this study, we report on clinical and cytogenetic characterization of two new cases involving 17p13.3 and 3p26 chromosomal regions in two sisters with familial history of lissencephaly. Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization and array Comparative Genomic Hybridization were performed. RESULTS: A deletion including the critical region of the Miller-Dieker syndrome of at least 2,9 Mb and a duplication of at least 3,6 Mb on the short arm of chromosome 3 were highlighted in one case. The opposite rearrangements, 17p13.3 duplication and 3p deletion, were observed in the second case. This double chromosomal aberration is the result of an adjacent 1:1 meiotic segregation of a maternal reciprocal translocation t(3,17)(p26.2;p13.3). CONCLUSIONS: 17p13.3 and 3p26 deletions have a clear range of phenotypic features while duplications still have an uncertain clinical significance. However, we could suggest that regardless of the type of the rearrangement, the gene dosage and interactions of CNTN4, CNTN6 and CHL1 in the 3p26 and PAFAH1B1, YWHAE in 17p13.3 could result in different clinical spectrums.

Genome organization in proximity to the BAP1 locus appears to play a pivotal role in a variety of cancers.

Cancer studies primarily focus on the characterization of the key driver genes and the underlying pathways. However, the contribution of other cancer-associated genes located in the genomic neighborhood of the driver genes could help to understand further aspects of cancer progression. Given the frequent involvement of chromosome 3 in multiple human cancers, in particular in the form of the prognostically highly relevant monosomy 3 in uveal melanoma (UM), we investigated the cumulative impact of cancer-associated genes on chromosome 3. Our analysis showed that these genes are enriched with repetitive elements with genes surrounded by distinctive repeats (MIR, hAT-Charlie, ERVL-MaLR, LINE-2, and simple/low complexity) in the promoter being more precisely associated with cancer-related pathways than the ones with major transposable elements (SINE/Alu and LINE-1). Additionally, these genes showed strong intrachromosomal chromatin interactions in 3D nuclear organization. Further investigations revealed a genomic hotspot in the vicinity of BAP1 locus, which is affected in 27 types of different cancers and contains abundant noncoding RNAs that are often expressed in a tissue-specific manner. The cross-species comparison of these cancer-associated genes revealed mostly a shared synteny in closer primates. However, near to the BAP1 locus signs of chromosomal inversions were observed during the course of evolution. To our knowledge, this is the first study to characterize the entire genomic neighborhood of cancer-associated genes located on any single chromosome. Based on our results, we hypothesize that monosomy of chromosome 3 will have important clinical and molecular consequences in the respective diseases and in particular in UM.

Chromosome 3 is a valid marker for prognostic testing of biopsy material from uveal melanoma later treated by brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: Monosomy 3 (M3) in uveal melanoma (UM) obtained after enucleation is significantly associated with metastatic death. With improved biopsy techniques, samples from patients treated with eye-preserving methods have become available. As the choice of treatment depends on tumour size, patients treated with eye-preserving brachytherapy tend to have smaller tumours. It has to be determined if M3 is a valid marker for prognosis of these patients. METHODS: Follow-up and clinical data were collected from a total of 451 UM patients: 291 patients were treated by brachytherapy. Tumour tissue was sampled by transretinal biopsy using the 23-gauge Essen biopsy forceps prior to therapy in 114 of them. Chromosome 3 status was determined by microsatellite analysis. Data were compared to those from 160 patients treated by enucleation. RESULTS: Chromosome 3 status correlates significantly with disease-related survival in both patient groups. The proportion of tumours with M3 is lower in the brachytherapy group compared to patients treated with enucleation (25/77 32% and 102/144 71%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: M3 is a valid marker for poor prognosis in uveal melanoma later treated by brachytherapy. The higher proportion of D3 tumours might explain, at least in part, the more favourable prognosis of patients treated by brachytherapy.

Ocular treatment of choroidal melanoma in relation to the prevention of metastatic death - A personal view.

About 50% of patients with choroidal melanoma develop metastatic disease, despite successful eradication of the primary tumor. Patient care is complicated by the fact that we do not know whether ocular treatment ever influences survival and if so in whom. Some authorities believe that metastatic spread is never preventable, because it has always occurred by the time the ocular tumor is detected. Others hold the view that metastatic spread can occur late, at least in some patients, in whom timely and successful treatment is life-saving. Some melanomas never seem to metastasize, even if they reach an advanced stage. It is likely that many patients are undergoing futile enucleation or experiencing severe ocular morbidity and visual loss from excessive radiation safety margins in the hope of living longer. Some of these patients would do better with tumor resection, often rejected because of concerns about iatrogenic tumor dissemination. At the same time, many patients with a small melanoma are being left untreated for years until growth is documented, possibly missing opportunities for prolonging life. Metastatic disease is highly likely when genetic tumor analysis detects monosomy 3, chromosome 8q gain, a class 2 gene expression profile, and/or BAP1 loss. Do these lethal genetic aberrations ever develop while the patient is under observation? If so, can these be predicted by genetic analysis? Do lethal mutations and metastasis ever occur because ocular treatment has failed to eradicate the tumor completely? Answers to these questions would profoundly change the management of patients with uveal melanoma.

Integrative Analysis Identifies Four Molecular and Clinical Subsets in Uveal Melanoma.

Comprehensive multiplatform analysis of 80 uveal melanomas (UM) identifies four molecularly distinct, clinically relevant subtypes: two associated with poor-prognosis monosomy 3 (M3) and two with better-prognosis disomy 3 (D3). We show that BAP1 loss follows M3 occurrence and correlates with a global DNA methylation state that is distinct from D3-UM. Poor-prognosis M3-UM divide into subsets with divergent genomic aberrations, transcriptional features, and clinical outcomes. We report change-of-function SRSF2 mutations. Within D3-UM, EIF1AX- and SRSF2/SF3B1-mutant tumors have distinct somatic copy number alterations and DNA methylation profiles, providing insight into the biology of these low- versus intermediate-risk clinical mutation subtypes.

Comparison of Gene Expression Profiling and Chromosome 3 Analysis by Fluorescent in situ Hybridization and Multiplex Ligation Probe Amplification in Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy Specimens of Uveal Melanoma.

PURPOSE: The aim of this paper was to assess the concordance between results of DecisionDx-UM specific gene expression profiling (GEP) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for chromosome 3 analysis, and between DecisionDx-UM GEP and multiplex ligation probe amplification (MLPA) in uveal melanoma undergoing intraoperative fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) for metastatic prognostication during brachytherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients diagnosed with posterior uveal melanoma who underwent intraoperative FNAB prior to placement of an iodine-125 radioactive plaque between 2012 and 2014. Two cohorts of patients were identified: Cohort 1 - tumors in which both GEP and FISH results were obtained, and Cohort 2 - tumors in which both GEP and MLPA results were obtained. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were identified for Cohort 1. FISH and GEP results were discordant in 7 tumors (15.9%). Forty-three patients were identified for Cohort 2. MLPA and GEP were discordant in 7 tumors (16.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Discordance between GEP and chromosome 3 status by FISH and MLPA occurred in our series at a rate of 15.9 and 16.3%, respectively. Caution must be advised when counseling a patient with a good-prognosis GEP "Class 1" result that the uveal tumor may actually harbor monosomy 3, which is associated with a poor prognosis for metastasis in nearly 20% of the patients.

Analysis of monosomy-3 in immunomagnetically isolated circulating melanoma cells in uveal melanoma patients.

Monosomy-3 in primary uveal melanoma (UM) is associated with a high risk of metastasis and mortality. Although circulating melanoma cells (CMC) can be found in most UM patients, only approximately 50% of the patients develop metastases. We utilized a novel immuno-FISH assay to detect chromosome-3 in intact CMC isolated by dual immunomagnetic enrichment. Circulating melanoma cells were detected in 91% of the patients (n = 44) with primary non-metastatic UM, of which 58% were positive for monosomy-3. The monosomy-3 status of CMC corresponded to the monosomy-3 status of the primary tumor in 10 of the 11 patients where this could be tested. Monosomy-3 in the CMC was associated with an advanced tumor stage (P = 0.046) and was detected in all four patients who developed metastasis within the follow-up period of 4 yr. This non-invasive technique may enable the identification of UM patients at risk for metastasis particularly when a primary tumor specimen is unavailable.