The Simulation of Muscles Forces Increases the Stresses in Lumbar Fixation Implants with Respect to Pure Moment Loading.

Simplified loading conditions such as pure moments are frequently used to compare different instrumentation techniques to treat spine disorders. The purpose of this study was to determine if the use of realistic loading conditions such as muscle forces can alter the stresses in the implants with respect to pure moment loading. A musculoskeletal model and a finite element model sharing the same anatomy were built and validated against in vitro data, and coupled in order to drive the finite element model with muscle forces calculated by the musculoskeletal one for a prescribed motion. Intact conditions as well as a L1-L5 posterior fixation with pedicle screws and rods were simulated in flexion-extension and lateral bending. The hardware stresses calculated with the finite element model with instrumentation under simplified and realistic loading conditions were compared. The ROM under simplified loading conditions showed good agreement with in vitro data. As expected, the ROMs between the two types of loading conditions showed relatively small differences. Realistic loading conditions increased the stresses in the pedicle screws and in the posterior rods with respect to simplified loading conditions; an increase of hardware stresses up to 40 MPa in extension for the posterior rods and 57 MPa in flexion for the pedicle screws were observed with respect to simplified loading conditions. This conclusion can be critical for the literature since it means that previous models which used pure moments may have underestimated the stresses in the implants in flexion-extension and in lateral bending.

Spinal loads and trunk muscles forces during level walking - A combined in vivo and in silico study on six subjects.

During level walking, lumbar spine is subjected to cyclic movements and intricate loading of the spinal discs and trunk musculature. This study aimed to estimate the spinal loads (T12-S1) and trunk muscles forces during a complete gait cycle. Six men, 24-33years walk barefoot at self-selected speed (4-5km/h). 3D kinematics and ground reaction forces were recorded using a motion capturing system and two force plates, implemented in an inverse dynamic musculoskeletal model to predict the spinal loads and trunk muscles forces. Additionally, the sensitivity of the intra-abdominal pressure and lumbar segment rotational stiffness was investigated. Peak spinal loads and trunk muscle forces were between the gait instances of heel strike and toe off. In L4-L5 segment, sensitivity analysis showed that average peak compressive, antero-posterior and medio-lateral shear forces were 130-179%, 2-15% and 1-6%, with max standard deviation (±STD) of 40%, 6% and 3% of the body weight. Average peak global muscles forces were 24-55% (longissimus thoracis), 11-23% (iliocostalis thoracis), 12-16% (external oblique), 17-25% (internal oblique) and 0-8% (rectus abdominus) of body weight whereas, the average peak local muscles forces were 11-19% (longissimus lumborum), 14-31% (iliocostalis lumborum) and 12-17% (multifidus). Maximum±STD of the global and local muscles forces were 13% and 8% of the body weight. Large inter-individual differences were found in peak compressive and trunk muscles forces whereas the sensitivity analysis also showed a substantial variation.