Identifying resilience: a system safety review of trauma and orthopaedic theatres.

A prospective, qualitative study, of trauma and orthopaedic theatres was undertaken using the CARe QI handbook and the SEIPS framework, with the aim of preventing future Never Events. The study demonstrated a new approach, focussed on understanding 'work as done' to identify opportunities to improve system resilience, tested, using the Model for Improvement. Undertaken during the Covid-19 pandemic, it demonstrates that such conditions should not be a deterrent to observational studies, but requiring greater time and resource than a standard investigation, the approach may not align with current organisational or regulatory expectations. At the conclusion of this study, the mean time between Never Events in theatres had increased from 46 to 224 days, an achievement that had not previously been possible using the regulatory required, safety I, investigatory approach. These findings should be used to inform future PSIRF and Never Event Frameworks, to ensure effective systems-based analysis and improvement.

The value of applying a prospective approach, incorporating system resilience and quality improvement in response to adverse safety events, was demonstrated, whilst highlighting the time and resource necessary for success. This study supports the recommendation that the use of the prospective systems-based approaches introduced by PSIRF, should be applied to never events.

Urology never events in the United Kingdom: A retrospective 10-year review.

Objectives: The aim was to assess the prevalence of never events (NEs) specific to urology in the United Kingdom and identify commonly occurring themes. Methods: Data from the National Health Service (NHS) NEs website were obtained and all NEs from 2012 to 2022 were reviewed. Urology-specific NEs were identified and further analysed in their respective categories. Data regarding the total number of surgical procedures performed in the NHS specific to each specialty were obtained via the NHS Hospital Episode Statistics website. Results: There were 3972 NEs recorded over the 10-year period with 95 (2.4%) of these as a result of urology surgery. The most common surgical intervention associated with a urological NE was ureteric stenting, which comprised 45/95 (47.4%) of all analysed NEs. These consisted of wrong site ureteric stent insertion (n = 29), wrong site ureteric stent removal (n = 9), wrong stent type (n = 5) and retained guidewires (n = 2). There were 7.14 million urology surgeries performed in the 10-year period, and prevalence was 0.0013%. Conclusion: NEs are fully preventable serious incidents in the NHS. This is the first study to investigate the prevalence of NEs in urology in the United Kingdom. This study demonstrates that in the last 10 years the prevalence of urology NEs is low at 0.0013%, with ureteric stent procedures accounting for more than half of the NEs. Urologists should be mindful of the potential for wrong site surgery in urologic stenting procedures.

Never events in plastic surgery: An analysis of surgical burns and medical malpractice litigation.

INTRODUCTION: Burns and fires in the operating room are a known risk and their prevention has contributed to many additional safety measures. Despite these safeguards, burn injuries contribute significantly to the medical malpractice landscape. The aim of the present study is to analyze malpractice litigation related to burn and fire injuries in plastic and reconstructive surgery, identify mechanisms of injury, and develop strategies for prevention. METHODS: The Westlaw and LexisNexis databases were queried for jury verdicts and settlements in malpractice lawsuits related to burn and fire injuries that occurred during plastic surgery procedures. The Boolean terms included "burn & injury & plastic", "fire & injury & "plastic surg!"" in Westlaw, and "burn & injury & "plastic surg!"", "fire & injury & "plastic surg!"" in LexisNexis. RESULTS: A total of 46 cases met the inclusion criteria for this study. Overheated surgical instruments and cautery devices were the most common mechanisms for litigation. Plastic surgeons were defendants in 40 (87%) cases. Of the included cases, 43% were ruled in favor of the defendant, while 33% were ruled in favor of the plaintiff. Mishandling of cautery devices 6 (13%), heated surgical instruments 6 (13%), and topical acids 2 (4%) were the most common types of errors encountered. CONCLUSION: Never events causing burn injury in plastic and reconstructive surgery are ultimately caused by human error or neglect. The misuse of overheated surgical instruments and cauterizing devices should be the focus for improving patient safety and reducing the risk of medical malpractice. Forcing functions and additional safeguards should be considered to minimize the risk of costly litigation and unnecessary severe harm to patients.

Scalding saline injuries: Preventing a rare but serious event in medical litigation.

This study aimed to investigate the causes, outcomes, and compensation amounts of saline-induced perioperative burns, a rare but entirely preventable event. Saline-induced burns pose a significant risk to patients, and understanding the factors associated with such incidents is crucial for improving patient safety. Previous studies highlighted the use of hot saline bags and solution during medical procedures as a potential cause of these burns. A retrospective analysis of cases involving perioperative saline-induced burns was conducted using the Westlaw and Lexis Nexis legal databases. Eight relevant cases were identified and analyzed to determine the causes, outcomes, and compensation amounts. Hot saline bags used for positioning and hot saline solution were identified as the primary causes of saline-induced burns. Out of the eight cases analyzed, four resulted in a favorable verdict for the plaintiff, three cases were settled, and one case was in favor of the defense. Compensation amounts ranged from no monetary compensation to over one million dollars. This study highlights the need for increased awareness among medical professionals regarding the risks associated with saline-induced burns, and the importance of implementing guidelines for the safe use of hot saline bags and solution. Together these measures can hopefully mitigate the occurrence of these preventable incidents, improve patient safety, and reduce medicolegal exposure.

Is surgery on the right track? The burden of wrong-site surgery.

Surgery is a cornerstone of modern health care. Medical errors resulting from the clinical treatment of patients are a problem with global relevance. Among "never events," wrong-site surgery accounts for preventable mistakes with a big impact on patients as well as the economy. Wrong-site surgery has many contributing factors, whose identification is challenging. Nevertheless, it remains indisputable that wrong-site surgery affects patients' lives on many levels, ranging from physical disability to mental health. In addition, it aggravates the economic integrity of healthcare systems, healthcare workers' professional standards, and the public's trust in surgical services. Possible solutions for wrong-site surgery include perioperative protocols, surgical checklists, effective communication, education, continuous evaluation of existing procedures, and the implementation of new technology.

Identifying a list of healthcare 'never events' to effect system change: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

BACKGROUND: Never events (NEs) are patient safety incidents that are preventable and so serious they should never happen. To reduce NEs, several frameworks have been introduced over the past two decades; however, NEs and their harms continue to occur. These frameworks have varying events, terminology and preventability, which hinders collaboration. This systematic review aims to identify the most serious and preventable events for targeted improvement efforts by answering the following questions: Which patient safety events are most frequently classified as never events? Which ones are most commonly described as entirely preventable? METHODS: For this narrative synthesis systematic review we searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central and CINAHL for articles published from 1 January 2001 to 27 October 2021. We included papers of any study design or article type (excluding press releases/announcements) that listed NEs or an existing NE framework. RESULTS: Our analyses included 367 reports identifying 125 unique NEs. Those most frequently reported were surgery on the wrong body part, wrong surgical procedure, unintentionally retained foreign objects and surgery on the wrong patient. Researchers classified 19.4% of NEs as 'wholly preventable'. Those most included in this category were surgery on the wrong body part or patient, wrong surgical procedure, improper administration of a potassium-containing solution and wrong-route administration of medication (excluding chemotherapy). CONCLUSIONS: To improve collaboration and facilitate learning from errors, we need a single list that focuses on the most preventable and serious NEs. Our review shows that surgery on the wrong body part or patient, or the wrong surgical procedure best meet these criteria.

Nurses' perceptions of the influence of leadership behaviours and organisational culture on patient safety incident reporting practices.

BACKGROUND: Patient safety is a priority for all healthcare organisations. Enhancing patient safety incident reporting practices requires effective leadership behaviours at all levels in healthcare organisations. AIM: To explore nurses' perceptions of the influence of nurse managers' leadership behaviours and organisational culture on patient safety incident reporting practices. METHOD: A descriptive, cross-sectional, correlational design was adopted with a convenience sample of 325 nurses from 15 Jordanian hospitals. RESULTS: Respondents had positive perceptions of their nurse managers' leadership behaviours and organisational culture. There was a significant positive relationship between leadership behaviours and organisational culture (r=0.423, P<0.001) and between leadership behaviours and actual incident-reporting practices (r=0.131, P<0.001). Additionally, there was a significant positive relationship between organisational culture and incident-reporting practices (r=0.250, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Healthcare organisations must develop leaders who will foster a supportive and just culture that will enhance nurses' practice with regards to reporting patient safety incidents.

AVOIDable medical errors in invasive procedures: Facts on the ground - An NHS staff survey.

BACKGROUND: Never Events represent a serious problem with a high burden on healthcare providers' facilities. Despite introducing various safety checklists and precautions, many Never Events are reported yearly. OBJECTIVE: This survey aims to assess awareness and compliance with the safety standards and obtain recommendations from the National Health Service (NHS) staff on preventative measures. METHODS: An online survey of 45 questions has been conducted directed at NHS staff involved in invasive procedures. The questions were designed to assess the level of awareness, training and education delivered to the staff on patient safety. Moreover, we designed a set of focused questions to assess compliance with the National Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures (NatSSIPs) guidance. Open questions were added to encourage the staff to give practical recommendations on tackling and preventing these incidents. Invitations were sent through social media, and the survey was kept live from 20/11/2021 to 23/04/2022. RESULTS: Out of 700 invitations sent, 75 completed the survey (10.7%). 96% and 94.67% were familiar with the terms Never Events and near-miss, respectively. However, 52% and 36.49% were aware of National and Local Safety Standards for Invasive procedures (NatSSIPs-LocSSIPs), respectively. 28 (37.33%) had training on preventing medical errors. 48 (64%) believe that training on safety checklists should be delivered during undergraduate education. Fourteen (18.67%) had experiences when the checklists failed to prevent medical errors. 53 (70.67%) have seen the operating list or the consent forms containing abbreviations. Thirty-three (44%) have a failed counting reconciliation algorithm. NHS staff emphasised the importance of multi-level checks, utilisation of specific checklists, patient involvement in the safety checks, adequate staffing, avoidance of staff change in the middle of a procedure and change of list order, and investment in training and education on patient safety. CONCLUSION: This survey showed a low awareness of some of the principal patient safety aspects and poor compliance with NatSSIPs recommendations. Checklists fail on some occasions to prevent medical errors. Process redesign creating a safe environment, and enhancing a safety culture could be the key. The study presented the recommendations of the staff on preventative measures.

Common preventable errors in hand surgery: Analysis of NHS never events data and a proposed safety checklist.

BACKGROUND: Hand surgical procedures are common interventions in elective and emergency settings. The complex nature of the injuries and management by multiple specialities could be a potential source of medical errors and never events (NEs). Awareness of the common NEs could potentially help prevent their occurrence in the future. OBJECTIVE: To analyse the NHS England database to identify the common NEs in hand surgery and present a simple, practical safety checklist for hand surgery. METHODS: The NHS NEs database from 2012 to 2021 has been analysed to identify the common hand surgery-related never events. We identified the common categories and themes within. Our theme development process is based on anatomical considerations and the nature of the incidents. Additionally, we designed a simple Safety Checklist for hand surgery. RESULTS: We identified a total of 3742 never events with 50 incidents related to hand surgery, representing (1.3%). Wrong-site surgery was the commonest category (n = 30), representing 60% of the hand surgery-related NEs. We identified seven different themes under wrong-site surgery. Wrong finger or digit surgery was the commonest theme, with 17 reported incidents representing 57% of wrong-site surgeries. This is followed by five wrong digits injections and three wrong k wire placements representing 16.6% and 10%, respectively. The second most common category was wrong incisions (n = 15), representing 30%; 13 patients had wrong finger incisions. Two patients had carpal tunnel incisions before surgeons realised that the procedures were for trigger finger release. The third category included four wrong procedures, with two incidents of carpal tunnel release instead of trigger finger operation or Dequervain tendon release. Finally, one patient had an injection for carpal tunnel intended for another patient. CONCLUSION: Hand surgery-related NEs represent a small fraction (1.3%) of all NEs within the NHS database. We identified 50 hand surgery-related NEs arranged into 14 different themes. Additionally, we proposed a hand surgery-specific safety checklist to reduce the incidence of these incidents in the future.

Impact of Facility Volume on Patient Safety Indicator Events After Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of facility volume on Patient Safety Indicator (PSI) events following transsphenoidal pituitary surgery (TSPS). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database review. SETTING: National Inpatient Sample database (2003-2011). METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample was queried for TSPS cases from 2003 to 2011. Facility volume was defined by tertile of average annual number of TSPS procedures performed. PSIs, based on in-hospital complications identified by the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality, and poor outcomes, such as mortality and tracheostomy, were analyzed. RESULTS: An overall 16,039 cases were included: 804 had ≥1 PSI and 15,235 had none. A greater proportion of male to female (5.8% vs 4.3%) and Black to White (7.0% vs 4.5%) patients experienced PSIs. There was an increased likelihood of poor outcome (odds ratio [OR], 3.1 [95% CI, 2.5-3.7]; P < .001) and mortality (OR, 30.1 [95% CI, 18.5-48.8]; P < .001) with a PSI. The incidence rates of PSIs at low-, intermediate-, and high-volume facilities were 5.7%, 5.1%, and 4.2%, respectively. Odds of poor outcome with PSIs were greater at low-volume facilities (OR, 3.3 [95% CI, 2.4-4.4]; P < .001) vs intermediate (OR, 3.1 [95% CI, 2.1-4.2]; P < .001) and high (OR, 2.5 [95% CI, 1.7-3.8]; P < .001). Odds of mortality with PSIs were greater at high-volume facilities (OR, 43.0 [95% CI, 14.3-129.4]; P < .001) vs intermediate (OR, 40.0 [95% CI, 18.5-86.4]; P < .001) and low (OR, 17.3 [95% CI, 8.0-37.7]; P < .001). CONCLUSION: PSIs were associated with a higher likelihood of poor outcome and mortality following TSPS. Patients who experienced PSIs had a lower risk of poor outcome but increased mortality at higher-volume facilities.

Understanding the role of the scrub nurse during robotic surgery.

In the operating theatre, the scrub nurse has a wide range of roles, including responsibility for organising and ensuring that the correct instrumentation is available to the surgeon in the operating field, while maintaining stringent adherence to the principles of asepsis. Robotic techniques have revolutionised many procedures, providing surgeons with improved tissue access and tool control compared with open or laparoscopic techniques. However, adopting this technology has created additional challenges in the scrub nurse's role in areas such as team dynamics and the need to gather and disseminate vital patient information. This article explores the role of the scrub nurse and the challenges that may be encountered in the developing area of robotic surgery.

Researching nurses' adherence to patient safety guidelines in emergency departments.

BACKGROUND: One of the reasons why patient safety may be put at risk during healthcare interventions is a lack of staff adherence to patient safety guidelines. There could be a relationship between staff's adherence to patient safety guidelines and their perceived level of reward for their work and/or motivation. AIM: To examine the relationship between reward and adherence to patient safety guidelines, and between motivation and adherence to patient safety guidelines, among nurses working in emergency departments (EDs) in Indonesia. METHOD: This was a cross-sectional study of 101 nurses working in the EDs of four hospitals in Indonesia. Self-reported questionnaires were used to collect data on the level of reward participants felt they received for their work, the level of participants' motivation for their work, and participants' adherence to patient safety guidelines. Spearman's rank correlation testing was used to determine the relationships between variables. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant negative relationship between reward and adherence (P=0.019, r=-0.233), which meant that those who perceived their reward as low were more likely to adhere to patient safety guidelines than those who felt they were highly rewarded. There was a statistically significant positive relationship between motivation and adherence to patient safety guidelines (P=0.017, r=0.236), which meant that the higher the motivation, the higher participants' level of adherence to patient safety guidelines. CONCLUSION: Ensuring ED nurses are motivated for their work by offering rewards - such as a decent salary, a supportive workplace environment and career progression opportunities - is important to enhance their adherence to patient safety guidelines.

Predicting 30-Day Perioperative Outcomes in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients With Baseline Paralysis or Functional Dependence.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity (ASD) are often preoperatively risk stratified using standardized instruments to assess for perioperative complications. Many ASD instruments account for medical comorbidity and radiographic parameters, but few consider a patient's ability to independently accomplish necessary activities of daily living (ADLs). METHODS: Patients ≥18 years undergoing ASD corrective surgery were identified in National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Patients were grouped by (1) plegic status and (2) dependence in completing ADLs ("totally dependent" = requires total assistance in ADLs, "partially dependent" = uses prosthetics/devices but still requires help, "independent" = requires no help). Quadriplegics and totally dependent patients comprised "severe functional dependence," paraplegics/hemiplegics who are "partially dependent" comprised "moderate functional dependence," and "independent" nonplegics comprised "independent." Analysis of variance with post hoc testing and Kruskal-Wallis tests compared demographics and perioperative outcomes across groups. Logistic regression found predictors of inferior outcomes, controlling for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and invasiveness. Subanalysis correlated functional dependence with other established metrics such as the modified Frailty Index (mFI) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). RESULTS: A total of 40,990 ASD patients (mean age 57.1 years, 53% women, mean BMI 29.8 kg/m2) were included. Mean invasiveness score was 6.9 ± 4.0; 95.2% were independent (Indep), 4.3% moderate (Mod), and 0.5% severe (Sev). Sev had higher baseline invasiveness than Mod or Indep groups (9.0, 8.3, and 6.8, respectively, P < 0.001). Compared with the Indep patients, Sev and Mod had significantly longer inpatient length of stay (LOS; 10.9, 8.4, 3.8 days, P < 0.001), higher rates of surgical site infection (2.2%, 2.9%, 1.5%, P < 0.001), and more never events (17.7%, 9.9%, 4.0%, P < 0.001). Mod had higher readmission rates than either the Sev or Indep groups (30.2%, 2.7%, 10.3%, P < 0.001). No differences in implant failure were observed (P > 0.05). Controlling for age, sex, BMI, CCI, invasiveness, and frailty, regression equations showed increasing functional dependence significantly increased odds of never events (OR, 1.82 [95% CI 1.57-2.10], P < 0.001), specifically urinary tract infection (OR, 2.03 [95% CI 1.66-2.50], P < 0.001) and deep venous thrombosis (OR, 2.04 [95% CI 1.61-2.57], P < 0.001). Increasing functional dependence also predicted longer LOS (OR, 3.16 [95% CI 2.85-3.46], P < 0.001) and readmission (OR, 2.73 [95% CI 2.47-3.02], P < 0.001). Subanalysis showed functional dependence correlated more strongly with mFI (r = 0.270, P < 0.001) than modified CCI (mCCI; r = 0.108, P < 0.001), while mFI and mCCI correlated most with one another (r = 0.346, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Severe functional dependence had significantly longer LOS and more never-event complications than moderate or independent groups. Overall, functional dependence may show superiority to traditional metrics in predicting poor perioperative outcomes, such as increased LOS, readmission rate, and risk of surgical site infection and never events.

Addressing the important error of missing surgical items in an operated patient.

BACKGROUND: We aim to analyze the characteristics of incidences of missing surgical items (MSIs) and to examine the changes in MSI events following the implementation of an MSI prevention program. METHODS: All surgical cases registered in our medical center from January 2014 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Among 559,910 operations, 154 MSI cases were reported. Mean patient age was 48.67 years (standard deviation, 20.88), and 56.6% were female. The rate of MSIs was 0.259/1000 cases. Seventy-seven MSI cases (53.10%) had no consequences, 47 (32.41%) had mild consequences, and 21 (14.48%) had severe consequences. These last 21 cases represented a rate of 0.037/1000 cases. MSI events were more frequent in cardiac surgery (1.82/1000 operations). Textile elements were the most commonly retained materials (28.97% of cases). In total, 15.86% of the cases were not properly reported. The risk factors associated with MSIs included body mass index (BMI) above 35 kg/m2 and prolonged operative time. After the implementation of the institutional prevention system in January 2017, there was a gradual decrease in the occurrence of severe events despite an increase in the number of MSIs. CONCLUSION: Despite the increase in the rate of MSIs, an implemented transparency and reporting system helped reduce the cases with serious consequences. To further prevent the occurrence of losing surgical elements in a surgery, we recommend educating OR staff members about responsibility and obligation to report all incidents that are caused during an operation, to develop an event reporting system as well as "rituals" within the OR setting to increase the team's awareness to MSIs. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04293536). Date of registration: 08.01.2021. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04293536 .

Never events in orthopaedics: A nationwide data analysis and guidance on preventative measures.

BACKGROUND: Never Events (NE) are serious clinical incidents that are wholly preventable if appropriate institutional safeguards are in place and followed. They are often used as a surrogate of the quality of healthcare delivered by an institution. Most NEs are surgical and orthopaedic surgery is one of the most involved specialties. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify common NE themes associated with orthopaedics within the National Health Service (NHS) of England. METHOD: We conducted an observational study analysing the annual NE data published by the NHS England from 2012 to 2020 to collate all orthopaedic surgery-related NE and construct relevant recurring themes. RESULTS: We identified 460 orthopaedic NE out of a total of 3247 (14.16%) reported NE to NHS England. There were 206 Wrong implants/prostheses under 8 different themes. Wrong hip and knee prosthesis were the commonest "wrong implants" (n = 94; 45.63% and n = 91; 44.17% respectively). There were 197 "wrong-site surgery" incidents in 22 different themes. The commonest of these was the laterality problems accounting for 64 (32.48%) incidents followed by 63 (31.97%) incidents of wrong spinal level interventions. There were 18 (9.13%) incidents of intervention on the wrong patients and 17 (8.62%) wrong incisions. Retained pieces of instruments were the commonest retained foreign body with 15 (26.13%) incidents. The next categories were retained drill parts and retained instruments with 13 (22.80%) incidents each. CONCLUSION: We identified 47 different themes of NE specific to orthopaedic surgery. Awareness of these themes would help in their prevention. Site marking can be challenging in the presence of cast and on operating on the digits and spine. Addition of a real-time intra-operative implant scan to the National Joint Registry can avoid wrong implant selection while fiducial markers, intraoperative imaging, O-arm navigation, and second time-out could help prevent wrong level spinal surgery.

Improving safety by developing trust with a just culture.

This article presents a simple conceptual road map for implementing a just culture in healthcare settings. The concept of just culture was developed as one of five fundamental elements of a safety culture by psychology professor James Reason in 1997. A just culture requires an unbiased method of judging human error and is designed to develop organisational trust so that adverse medical events (errors) are reported and corrected before they combine with other errors to cause injury or death. To implement a just culture properly so as to increase organisational safety, practitioners must understand its role in enabling the error reporting needed to develop a safety culture. This article reviews these foundational concepts and explores the human causes of errors that a just culture addresses, the psychological importance of a just culture in enabling error reporting and how to implement a just culture in organisations.

Criteria for recommendations after perioperative sentinel events.

BACKGROUND: The recurrence of sentinel events (SEs) is a persistent problem worldwide, despite repeated analyses and recommendations formulated to prevent recurrence. Research suggests this is partly attributable to the quality of the recommendations, and determining if a recommendation will be effective is not yet covered by an adequate guideline. Our objectives were to (1) develop and validate criteria for high-quality recommendations, and (2) evaluate recommendations using the criteria developed. METHODS: (1) Criteria were developed by experts using the bowtie method. Medical doctors then determined if the recommendations of Dutch in-hospital SE analysis reports met the criteria, after which interobserver variability was tested. (2) Researchers determined which recommendations of Dutch perioperative SE analysis reports produced from 2017 to 2018 met the criteria. RESULTS: The criteria were: (1) a recommendation needs to be well defined and clear, (2) it needs to specifically describe the intended changes, and (3) it needs to describe how it will reduce the risk or limit the consequences of a similar SE. Validation of criteria showed substantial interobserver agreement. The SE analysis reports (n=115) contained 442 recommendations, of which 64% failed to meet all criteria, and 28% of reports did not contain a single recommendation that met the criteria. CONCLUSION: We developed and validated criteria for high-quality recommendations. The majority of recommendations did not meet our criteria. It was disconcerting to find that over a quarter of the investigations did not produce a single recommendation that met the criteria, not even in SEs with a fatal outcome. Healthcare providers have an obligation to prevent SEs, and certainly their recurrence. We anticipate that using these criteria to determine the potential of recommendations will aid in this endeavour.