The predictive risk factors associated with non-dipper profile in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension.

Background and aims: The non-dipper status represented by blood pressure reduction by less than 10 percent during sleep is present in about 50 percent of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and hypertension, a pattern associated with more frequent cardiovascular complications and reserved prognosis. This study analyzed the predictive risk factors associated with the different dipper profiles, especially with the nocturnal pattern, following the mean arterial pressure (MAP), the mean heart rate (MHR), and the mean pulse pressure (MPP) in patients with T2D and hypertension, established by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Method: 166 consecutive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension were included in a cross-sectional study, and they underwent 24-hour ABPM. We excluded patients with secondary hypertension, acute coronary disease and heart failure, with oncologic or endocrine disease. The simple and multiple linear regression models were performed predicting 24-hour, day and night MAP, MHR, and MPP according to various predictors, using software R version 4.3.1. Results: There were 80 non-dippers (48.20%), 57 dippers (34.34%), 22 reverse-dippers (13.25%) and seven extreme-dippers (4.21%). A statistically significant association was observed between MAP 24-hour and total cholesterol (TC) (higher TC values were associated with higher MAP /24 h values): adjusted coefficient B of the regression slope: 0.09, 95% confidence interval CI (0.04-0.15), p=0.003. In the multivariate analysis: adjusted B: 8.64, 95% CI (-14.67-2.61), p=0.006, beta-blockers reached the threshold of statistical significance in relation to MHR/24 h, their presence decreasing the heart rate. PP/24 hours was associated in the multivariate analysis with age: adjusted B: 0.45, 95% CI (0.05-0.85), p=0.28; abdominal circumference: 0.26, 95% CI (0.03-0.49), p=0.028, and total cholesterol: 0.1, 95% CI (0.02-0.17), p=0.013. Diabetic nephropathy was statistically significantly associated with PP/24 h: adjusted B: 10.19, 95% CI (1.24-19.14), p=0.027. Conclusions: High cholesterol was associated with higher values of MAP and PP. Beta-blocker treatment lowered non-dipper MHR. Age and AC were correlated with increased PP values. These are predictive risk factors associated with the status of non-dippers established by ABPM, and they represent a veritable link to the non-dipper pattern in patients with T2D and hypertension.

Prediction of non-dipper blood pressure pattern in Chinese patients with hypertension using a nomogram model.

Non-dipper blood pressure has been shown to affect cardiovascular outcomes and cognitive function in patients with hypertension. Although some studies have explored the influencing factors of non-dipper blood pressure, there is still relatively little research on constructing a prediction model. This study aimed to develop and validate a simple and practical nomogram prediction model and explore relevant elements that could affect the dipper blood pressure relationship in patients with hypertension. A convenient sampling method was used to select 356 inpatients with hypertension who visited the Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical College from January 2022 to September 2022. All patients were randomly assigned to the training cohort (75%, n = 267) and the validation cohort (25%, n = 89). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were utilized to identify influencing factors. The nomogram was developed and evaluated based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the area under the ROC curve (AUC), and decision curve analyses. The optimal cutoff values for the prevalence of dipper blood pressure were estimated. The nomogram was established using six variables, including age, sex, hemoglobin (Hb), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), ejection fraction (EF), and heart rate. The AUC was 0.860 in the training cohort. The cutoff values for optimally predicting the prevalence of dipper blood pressure were 41.50 years, 151.00 g/L, 117.53 mL/min/1.73 m2, 64.50%, and 75 beats per minute for age, Hb, eGFR, ejection fraction, and heart rate, respectively. In summary, our nomogram can be used as a simple, plausible, affordable, and widely implementable tool to predict the blood pressure pattern of Chinese patients with hypertension.

Mean Platelet Volume/Platelet Count Ratio and Dipper/Non-Dipper Hypertensive Patients.

There is an interaction between mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet count (PC), inflammation, and platelet reactivity. The present study evaluated the relationship between the MPV/PC ratio and blood pressure (BP) using 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). A total of 720 patients (male: 291) were included in the study. Based on the ABPM outcomes, they were divided into two groups: dipper hypertensive (n = 350; male: 136) and non-dipper hypertensive (n = 370; male: 155). Peripheral venous blood samples obtained at admission were used for PC and MPV calculations. Both groups displayed identical clinical characteristics. Non-dipper hypertensives had a higher MPV/PC ratio than dipper hypertensives [0.044; (0.036-0.055); 0.036 (0.030-0.042); P < .001]. According to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the optimal cut-off value of the MPV/PC ratio for predicting non-dipper patterns in hypertensive patients was 0.040 (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.726, P < .001). Sensitivity was 64.1% and specificity was 64.3%. The MPV/PC ratio may represent mechanisms involved in increasing cardiovascular risk in non-dipper hypertensives compared with dipper hypertensives.

Obstructive sleep apnea and non-dipper: epiphenomena or risks of Alzheimer's disease?: a review from the HOPE Asia Network.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and associated nocturnal blood pressure (BP) surges is associated with non-dipper. On the other hand, the relationship between neurodegenerative diseases and non-dipper hypertension has been reported. To date, few studies have evaluated the relationships of nocturnal BP dipping patterns and OSA in relation to neurodegenerative diseases, particularly Alzheimer's disease (AD). This review examines the etiology of the association between OSA and the non-dipper pattern of hypertension and how both are involved in the development of AD. To set the stage for this review, we first focus on the pathophysiology of AD, which is interrelated with sleep apnea and non-dipper through dysregulation of central autonomic network.

sFlt-1/PIGF ratio positive associated with non-dipper type change in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring(ABPM) for preeclampsia development.

In order to explore relationship of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1/placental growth factor (sFlt-1/PlGF) in suspected preeclampsia(PE), suspected PE participants in 28 + 0 to 33 + 6 weeks underwent ABPM and sFlt-1/PlGF from July 2020 to July 2022 were included(N = 476) in study. ABPM parameters were compared between sFlt-1/PlGF ≥38 and <38 groups. Correlation analysis was performed between ABPM and sFlt-1/PlGF, and logistic regression was used to explore prediction value for PE in 2 weeks. One hundred eighteen cases developed PE in 2 weeks with 114 from sFlt-1/PlGF ≥38 group. Daytime and nighttime BP were all increased,with increased non-dipper (58.4% vs. 30.3%), riser (22.1% vs. 13.1%) and and decreased Dipper (15.4% vs. 45.9%) type of ABPM in sFlt-1/PlGF ≥38 groups (P < 0.05).The riser group had the highest sFlt-1 and lowest PlGF. sFlt-1/PlGF and sFlt-1 were all positively correlated with systolic (SBP) & diastolic blood pressure(DBP)(P < 0.01), in which correlation coefficients of daytime and nighttime BP with sFlt-1 were ß = 150.05 & 157.67 for SBP, ß = 234 and 199.01 for DBP, respectively. However, PlGF was only negatively associated with nighttime SBP and DBP(P < 0.05), with no correlation with daytime BP (P > 0.05).Combining sFlt-1/PlGF and ABPM model, showed sFlt-1/PlGF (aOR = 2.01 (1.69-2.36)), Nighttime DBP (aOR = 1.14 (1.02-1.28)) contributed to preeclampsia prediction, and had improved predictive value compared to ABPM or sFlt-1/PlGF models alone(P < 0.05). sFlt-1/PlGF ratio was positively correlated with BP parameters, whereas PIGF was only negatively correlated with nocturnal BP and increased non-dipper type change in ABPM, which had a synergistic effect with sFlt-1/PlGF on PE prediction.

Does COVID-19 Cause Non-Dipper Hypertension?

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains a health problem worldwide. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of blood pressure (BP) on the circadian pattern and prevalence of new-onset non-dipper hypertension in the post-COVID period in patients with known hypertension. This prospective single-center study included 722 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 infection. Ambulatory BP (ABP) data were collected during their initial hospitalization. The ABP data were reassessed 1 month after the patients were discharged. The results were compared with a healthy control group with known hypertension but without COVID-19 infection. After exclusion criteria were applied, the study included 187 patients with COVID-19 and 136 healthy hypertensive controls. Post-COVID ABP showed that patients with COVID-19 had significantly higher mean 24-h systolic and diastolic BP, mean nighttime systolic and diastolic BP, and mean daytime diastolic BP than the control group. In addition, new-onset non-dipper hypertension was significantly higher in patients with COVID-19. This study demonstrated for the first time that the circadian pattern is disturbed and a non-dipper pattern develops in individuals with known hypertension during the post-COVID period.

Blunted circadian variation of blood pressure in individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction and stroke are life-threatening complications associated with Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). As previous studies observed an association between cardiovascular events and the loss of circadian variations of blood pressure, we investigated the 24 h circadian rhythm of blood pressure (BP) in 24 NF1 patients (10 males and 14 females, with a mean age of 39.5 years ± 14 years) by using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). RESULTS: Only one-third of the patient were dippers, 50% were non-dippers, and 17% were risers. Reduced variability of systolic and diastolic nocturnal blood pressure was observed in NF1 patients compared with several studies of normotensive individuals (p = 0.024). In NF1 patients, the blunted systolic nocturnal decline was significantly associated with the number of neurofibromas (p = 0.049) and the presence of a plexiform neurofibroma (p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: Most NF1 patients in this study showed a "non-dipper" pattern with a blunted nocturnal BP decline, which is considered an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events in normotensive and hypertensive individuals. Periodic monitoring of BP should be included in NF1 follow-up guidelines to diagnose masked hypertension or a non-dipper/riser pattern which would significantly increase the morbidity and mortality of NF1 patients to implement therapeutic strategies.

The Relationship Between the Dipping Pattern and Coronary Artery Disease Severity Assessed by the SYNTAX Score in Patients With Hypertension.

Background The morbidity and mortality rates related to hypertension (HT) are still high despite the developments in this area. Nondipper hypertension (NDHT) is related to worse clinical outcomes. But the dipping pattern of HT is not still used for treatment targets. In this study, we investigated the effect of dipping patterns on coronary artery disease (CAD) complexity evaluated by the SYNTAX score (SS). Methodology Patients with stable CAD and HT were included in the study. All patients were monitored with 24-hour ambulatory monitoring, and dipping patterns were evaluated. Coronary artery complexity was determined by SS for all patients and compared along with different dipping patterns. Results A total of 331 patients with HT and stable CAD were evaluated in the study. The mean age of the patients was 62.6 ± 9.9 years, and 172 (52%) were male. The number and percentage of patients with dipper HT (DHT), NDHT, over-dipper HT (ODHT), and reverse-dipper HT (RDHT) were 89 (26%), 143 (43%), 11 (3%), and 88 (26%), respectively. When the groups were compared according to SS, the SS of the patients with RDHT were significantly higher (the SS were 6.33, 4.99, 3.09, and 2.7 for RDHT, ODHT, NDHT, and DHT, respectively, P = 0.003). The mean SS between the DHT group and the NDHT group (P = 0.03) and between the DHT group and the RDHT group (P = 0.01) was significantly different. The less decrease or increase in mean blood pressure (MnBP) values was significantly correlated with high SS. Conclusions NDHT, especially the reverse dipping pattern, is closely related to complex CAD. Meticulous consideration of dipping patterns can identify high-risk patients and improve clinical outcomes.

Neurogenic Supine Hypertension and Cardiovascular Autonomic Dysfunction in Patients with Parkinson's Disease.

Background: Natural history and disease progression in patients with Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease (PD) is quite heterogeneous. Autonomic dysfunction occurs commonly among Idiopathic PD patients. Heart rate variability and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring are used to assess cardiac autonomic dysfunction. The prevalence and magnitude of supine hypertension in Indian PD patients has not been studied to date. The present study aimed to record cardiovascular autonomic functions and supine hypertension in PD patients and to correlate them with the age of onset, duration and severity of the disease, and non-motor symptom burden. Material and Methods: The cross-sectional study involved 60 PD patients. Webster rating scale was used to determine the disease severity. Non-motor symptom burden was assessed using the Non-Motor Symptom Scale (NMSS). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and heart rate variability parameters determined cardiac autonomic function. Supine hypertension was defined as Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) ≥150 mmHg and/or DBP ≥90 mmHg. Less than 10% decrease or even increase in blood pressure during the night were classified as non-dippers. Pearson coefficient was used appropriately to establish correlation. P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Age of onset was 61.2 ± 8.7 years and duration of disease was 1.7 ± 1.1 years. Mean Webster and non-motor symptom scores were 12.7 ± 4.4 and 15.5 ± 8.0, respectively. About 50 patients (83%) were non-dipper, while 32 (53%) had supine hypertension. Low Frequency oscillations (LF) (r = 0.28), High Frequency oscillations (HF) (r = 0.29), Standard Deviation NN intervals (SDNN) (0.26), and Root Mean Squared Successive Differences of NN intervals (RMSSD) (r = 0.28) correlated significantly with non-motor symptoms scale. LF (r = -0.39), HF (r = -0.43), SDNN (-0.40), RMSSD (r = -0.41), NN50 (r = -0.38), PNN50 (r = -0.42), mean SBP (r = 0.26), and mean DBP (r = 0.33) correlated significantly with disease duration. PNN50 (r = -0.255), mean SBP (r = -0.29), and mean DBP (r = -0.27) correlated significantly with age at onset. Conclusion: Awareness regarding neurogenic supine hypertension is needed as it occurs commonly among Indian PD patients. Heart rate variability (HRV) parameters and ambulatory blood pressure are of significant help in the detection of early cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction and correlate significantly with disease duration and non-motor symptom burden among PD patients.

Relationships between Easily Available Biomarkers and Non-Dipper Blood Pressure Pattern in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic inflammation plays an essential role in the pathophysiology of both arterial hypertension (HTN) and coronary artery disease (CAD), and is more pronounced in individuals with a non-dipper circadian blood pressure (BP) pattern. A non-dipping BP pattern is in turn is associated with increased cardiovascular morbi-mortality, and a higher risk of atherosclerotic events. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are readily available predictors of systemic inflammation and cardiovascular risk. The purpose of our study is to evaluate whether NLR, MLR and PLR can be used as cost-effective predictors of a non-dipping blood pressure pattern in hypertensive patients with stable CAD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional retrospective analysis that included 80 patients with hypertension and stable CAD (mean age 55.51 ± 11.83 years, 71.3% male) referred to a cardiovascular rehabilitation center. All patients underwent clinical examination, 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and standard blood analysis. RESULTS: Baseline demographic characteristics were similar in both groups. Patients with non-dipper pattern had significantly higher NLR (median = 2, IR (2-3), p < 0.001), MLR (median = 0.31, IR (0.23-0.39), p < 0.001) and PLR (median = 175, IR (144-215), p < 0.001) compared to dippers. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that MLR and PLR are inexpensive and easily accessible biomarkers that predict a non-dipping pattern in hypertensive patients with stable CAD.

Non-Dipper Blood Pressure Impact on Coronary Slow Flow in Hypertensive Patients With Normal Coronary Arteries.

OBJECTIVE: Coronary slow flow (CSF) is linked to myocardial ischemia, malignant arrhythmias, and cardiovascular mortality. On the other hand, hypertension (HTN) is an important risk factor for vascular disorders. There is limited research on the relationship between CSF and HTN. This study aimed to investigate TIMI frame count (TFC), which is an indicator of CSF, in dipper and non-dipper hypertensive individuals with normal coronary arteries. METHODS: The study was conducted as a retrospective observational study. Patients diagnosed with CSF and dipper or non-dipper hypertension were included in this study. Blood tests were routinely conducted for all patients. ECG was conducted for each patient, and echocardiography was performed. Coronary artery images were obtained in the CAG laboratory. Blood pressure (BP) measurements were obtained from the ambulatory Holter records. The patients were separated into two groups based on ambulatory Holter monitoring. The relationship between CSF and HTN was also examined. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients, comprising 25 women (37.2%) and 46 men (62.8%) with an average age of 52.75±9.42 years, were enrolled in the research. Based on ambulatory BP, the individuals were separated into two groups: non-dipper (n=36) and dipper (n=35). The pulse rate was significantly higher in the non-dipper group (p<0.001). In terms of mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, there were no substantial differences across the groups (p = 0.326 and p = 0.654, respectively). The daytime mean systolic and diastolic BP did not significantly differ across the groups (p = 0.842 and p = 0.421). The dipper group had substantially lower nighttime systolic and diastolic BP values (p <0.001). The LAD, Cx, and RCA TIMI frame scores were significantly lower in the dipper group (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In this study, non-dipper patients had a greater CSF rate than dipper.

Effect of administration of low-dose irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide combined with levamlodipine at different times on the circadian rhythm of blood pressure and the levels of MMPs and TIMPs in non-dipper patients with grade 1 and 2 hypertension.

This study aimed to probe the effects of low-dose irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide in combination with levamlodipine at different times on the circadian rhythm of blood pressure, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) levels in patients with non-dipper hypertension (NDH). In this prospective randomized controlled trial, 124 patients with NDH who visited our hospital between August 2018 and July 2021 were enrolled and divided into morning (62 patients) and night (62 patients) medication groups according to the random number table method. All patients received low-dose irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide combined with levamlodipine, with the morning medication group taking the medication between 7:00 and 10:00 and the night medication group taking the medication between 19:00 and 22:00 for 24 weeks. The effect of antihypertensive medication in both groups was measured, and changes in ambulatory blood pressure, blood pressure circadian rhythm, left ventricular structure, vascular endothelial function, MMPs, and TIMPs levels were observed before treatment initiation and after 24 weeks of treatment in both groups. The percentage of the dipper type was higher in the night medication group than in the morning medication group, while the percentage of the non-dipper type was lower in the morning medication group (p < .05). Low-dose irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide combined with levamlodipine at different times can effectively treat NDH, but bedtime dosing is more beneficial in reducing nocturnal blood pressure, reversing NDH, improving the circadian rhythm of blood pressure, left ventricular structure, regulating vascular endothelial function, increasing MMPs levels, and reducing TIMP levels.

Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index: A Novel Predictor for Non-dipper Hypertension.

Introduction The non-dipper hypertension (HT) pattern is associated with more end-organ damage and cardiovascular events than is dipper HT. Inflammation is widely established to play a role in the pathophysiology of HT. Recently, a new inflammatory and prognostic marker called the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) has emerged. Our goal is to determine whether there is a relationship between non-dipper HT and SII. Methods Our study is a single-center retrospective and ninety-one patients with HT were included. All patients were analyzed with simultaneous 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and laboratory parameters. Thirty-five patients had dipper HT while 56 patients had non-dipper HT. SII was calculated according to neutrophil, platelet, and lymphocyte counts. Results The median age was 48 (45-61 interquartile range (IQR)) in the non-dipper HT group, whereas it was 54 (44-64 IQR) in the dipper HT group. Although the neutrophil level, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet lymphocyte ratio, SII, sleeping systolic blood pressure (BP), and sleeping diastolic BP were higher (p=0.020, p=0.041, p=0.046, p=0.019, p<0.001, and p=0.001, respectively) in the non-dipper HT group, the lymphocyte level was lower (p=0.040). A multivariate logistic regression model shows that SII (odds ratio (OR)=1.023, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.002-1.112, p=0.012) may be an independent predictor of non-dipper HT. Conclusion Our study showed that the SII level was higher in the non-dipper HT patient group than in the dipper HT group. Furthermore, SII was an independent predictor of non-dipper HT. The high SII value in hypertension patients can be used as an early warning parameter to identify non-dipper HT patients.

The Association of Nocturnal Blood Pressure Patterns and Other Influencing Factors With Lacunes and Enlarged Perivascular Spaces in Hypertensive Patients.

Purpose: Nocturnal blood pressure dipping patterns have been associated with an increased risk of Cerebral Small Vessel Disease (CSVD), which has not been well-studied. This study is aimed to explore the association of dipping patterns and other factors with lacunes and enlarged perivascular spaces (EPVS) in patients with hypertension. Methods: We enrolled a total of 1,322 patients with essential hypertension in this study. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring were completed. Nocturnal BP decline was calculated, and then dipping patterns were classified. Patients were classified into four groups according to the performance of lacunes and EPVS in the MRI scan for statistical analysis. Results: (1) Nocturnal BP decline showed independent negative correlation with both lacunes and EPVS while mean systolic BP (mSBP) level showed an independent positive correlation with them (P < 0.05). (2) The frequency of reverse-dippers in the control group was significantly lower than that in other groups; the frequency of non-dippers in the lacunes group and EPVS group was significantly lower than that in the control group; the frequency of extreme-dippers in the EPVS group was significantly higher than that in the mixed (lacunes with EPVS) group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Both mSBP and dipping patterns might play an important role in developing lacunes and EPVS in patients with hypertension.

Frontal QRS-T angle may predict reverse dipping pattern in masked hypertensives.

AIMS: The frontal QRS-T (fQRST) angle is associated with worse cardiovascular outcome. The study aimed to assess the effect of reverse dipping pattern on f(QRST) angle in newly diagnosed masked hypertensive (MH) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Newly diagnosed 244 consecutive MH patients were included. According to dipping pattern, patients were grouped into three: dipper (n = 114), non-dipper (n = 106), and reverse dipper (n = 24) patterns. The f(QRST) angle, QT and corrected QT interval, and QT dispersion were measured from the 12-lead surface electrocardiogram and compared between groups. RESULTS: Of all, 51.2% (n = 125) were male. No gender difference was observed. Reverse dipper MH group had a significantly higher f(QRST) angle than the non-dipper and dipper MH groups (77.9 ± 8.6 vs. 32.4 ± 18.8 and 26.0 ± 18.5, respectively, p < .001). The cutoff value for f(QRST) angle of 51 predicts reverse dipping pattern (AUC: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.77-0.90; p < .001), with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 78%. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that f(QRST) angle is gradually increased starting from the dipper, non-dipper to reverse dipper masked hypertensives. The f(QRST) angle appears as an easy marker for the detection and risk stratification of hypertensive patients.

The Significance of Frontal Plane QRS-T Angle for Estimating Non-Dipper Hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: The frontal QRS-T angle (fQRS-T) is linked to myocardial ischemia and ventricular arrhythmias. On the other hand, non-dipper hypertension is a risk factor for cardiac adverse events. The objective of this research was to determine whether the fQRS-T, a marker of ventricular heterogeneity, could be used to predict non-dipper hypertensive individuals in the lack of left ventricular hypertrophy. METHODS: The observational study was carried out retrospectively. Patients diagnosed with hypertension were included in this study. Blood tests were routinely conducted for all patients. Electrocardiography (ECG) was conducted for each patient and echocardiography was performed. Blood pressure (BP) values were collected from the ambulatory Holter records. According to ambulatory Holter monitoring, the individuals were separated into two groups. The association between fQRS-T and hypertension was investigated. RESULTS: The research involved 123 patients, with an average age of 51.85±8.22 years, comprising 76 women (61.8%) and 47 males (38.2%). According to ambulatory Holter monitoring, patients were separated into dippers (n=65) and non-dippers (n=58). There were no statistically significant in the laboratory and echocardiographic variables (p>0.05). QT dispersion (QTd) and fQRS-T were substantially greater in the non-dipper group than in the dipper group (p=0.043 and p<0.001, respectively). Independent determinants of non-dipper status were determined by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. fQRS-T was found to be the only independent indicator of non-dipper status (OR: 1.03, 95%CI: 1.02-1.06, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The fQRS-T may be a useful marker for estimating non-dipper hypertensive individuals in the lack of left ventricular hypertrophy.

Association of nocturnal subconjunctival hemorrhage and non-dipper blood pressure pattern: A benign clue for serious diseases.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between non-dipper blood pressure pattern and subconjunctival hemorrhage (SCH). METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients with nocturnal SCH and 27 age, sex-matched controls were enrolled. Demographic, blood parameters, office blood pressure measurements, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) were evaluated. RESULTS: Mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) for nighttime (65.03 ± 7.1 vs. 70.78 ± 10.5, p: 0.22), mean heart rate for nighttime (64.54 ± 8.26 vs. 69.93 ± 9.85, p: 0.034), Minimum Systolic Blood pressure(SBP) and DBP values for nighttime (92.44 ± 9.72 vs. 99.44 ± 10.66, p:0.015 and 51.15 ± 8.31 vs. 57.7 ± 11.2, p: 0.018) were higher, nocturnal fall ratio of SBP and DBP were significantly lower in the SCH ( + ) group compared to SCH (-) group (5.38 ± 8.39 vs. 10.34 ± 6.08, p: 0.016 and 4.26 ± 8.92 vs. 13.78 ± 6.97, p < 0001 respectively). Ten patients (37%) in the SCH (-) group and 18 patients (66.7%) in the SCH ( + ) group were non-dippers (p: 0.029). Mean daytime SBP and DBP were higher compared to office measurements of 4 patients (14.8%) in the SCH (-) group and 11 patients (40.7%) in the SCH ( + ) group (p: 0.033). CONCLUSION: SCH had a strong association with non-dipper blood pressure pattern, higher nocturnal heart rate and masked hypertension which are precursors of myocardial infarction, stroke and renal failure. So, SCH should be considered as a clue for serious diseases such as coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, stroke and patients should be evaluated for ABPM.

Dosing Time Matters? Nighttime vs. Daytime Administration of Nifedipine Gastrointestinal Therapeutic System (GITS) or Amlodipine on Non-dipper Hypertension: A Randomized Controlled Trial of NARRAS.

Background: Non-dipper hypertension is often characterized by a blunted decrease of nocturnal blood pressure (BP) and is associated with increased risk of target organ damage and cardiovascular (CV) events, while the optimal treatment strategy is yet to be established. This trial was designed to evaluate whether nocturnal BP reduction and arterial stiffness improvement differ from antihypertensive agents and time of administration. Methods: Young and middle-aged adults (18-65 years) with non-dipper hypertension were randomly assigned to nifedipine GITS (gastrointestinal therapeutic system) 30 mg or amlodipine besylate 5 mg once daily for 8 weeks, either taken in the morning or at night. Dose was doubled at 4-week if BP is not at goal. Twenty-four hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and arterial stiffness were evaluated before and after 8 weeks of pharmacotherapy. The primary efficacy measure was the average nighttime systolic BP reduction. Results: A total of 98 non-dipper hypertensive patients (mean age 46.3 years) were randomized during Dec, 2016 and Dec, 2020, of whom 72 (73%) patients completed all ABPM and follow-up evaluations. Nighttime systolic BP significantly reduced at 8 weeks vs. baseline with nifedipine GITS or amlodipine, irrespective of dosing at nighttime (-9.9 vs -9.9 mmHg, P > 0.05) or daytime (-11.5 vs. -10.9 mmHg, P > 0.05). No difference was seen between these two agents, when combining the data of nighttime and daytime dosing together (-10.8 vs. -10.5 mmHg, respectively, P = 0.898). Daytime, 24-h systolic BP, diastolic BP at different time and pulse wave velocity reduced significantly and comparably, and recovery of dipping rhythm were similar among groups. Conclusion: Nighttime dosing of long-acting antihypertensive preparations, nifedipine GITS or amlodipine demonstrated similar effects on nocturnal BP reduction, dipping rhythm restoration and arterial elasticity improvement in younger subjects with non-dipper hypertension. These effects were comparable with morning dosing.

Effect of non-dipper pattern on echocardiographic myocardial work parameters in normotensive individuals.

BACKGROUND: It is known that non-dipper pattern (NDP) is associated with adverse outcomes in hypertensive patients. However, there is insufficient data on the outcome of NDP in normotensive individuals. Using myocardial work (MW) analysis, as a new echocardiographic examination method, this study aimed to determine the early myocardial effects of NDP in normotensive individuals. METHODS: This study included 70 normotensive individuals who were followed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). The subjects were divided into two groups according to dipper pattern (DP) and NDP. Conventional, strain, and MW findings were compared between the groups by making echocardiographic evaluations. RESULTS: The demographic characteristics, laboratory parameters, and measurements of cardiac chambers, and left ventricular (LV) walls were similar between the groups. There was no statistical difference between the groups in terms of LV 3-2-4 chambers strains and global longitudinal strain (GLS) values. LVMW parameters, global work index (GWI), and global constrictive work (GCW) were not statistically different between groups (2012 ± 127, 2069 ± 137, p = 0.16; 2327 ± 173, 2418 ± 296, p = 0.18, respectively). However, global waste work (GWW) and global work efficiency (GWE) parameters were different between the groups (144 ± 63.9, 104 ± 24.8, p < 0.001; 93.2 ± 3.17, 95.4 ± 1.28, p < 0.001, respectively). In regression analysis, GWW was independently associated with NDP. GWW model showed better results with higher likelihood chi-square and R2 values than GLS model in discriminating the predictable capability for NDP status. CONCLUSION: The results of MW analysis in this study showed that GWW values were higher and the GWE values were lower in normotensive individuals with NDP.

Association between epicardial adipose tissue and blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: Epicardial adipose tissue has been reported to be associated with the development of cardiometabolic disease. Whether this is true for hypertension and non-dipper blood pressure remains controversial. Here, we conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between EAT and blood pressure. DATA SYNTHESIS: Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for relevant papers. Studies reported on the difference of EAT thickness between hypertensive and normotensive patients, or those recorded odds ratio (OR) between EAT and hypertension were included. The standard mean difference (SMD) and ORs were extracted and pooled using a random-effects model respectively. We further assessed the effect of EAT on circadian rhythm of blood pressure by combining multiple-adjusted ORs for non-dipper blood pressure. Seven studies with an overall sample of 1089 patients reported the mean difference of EAT thickness between hypertensive and normotensive patients, and the hypertensive patients had higher EAT (SMD = 1.07; 95% CI: 0.66-1.48; I2 = 89.2%) compared with controls. However, the pooled association between EAT and hypertension from two studies was not significant (OR = 1.65, 95%CI 0.62-4.68; I2 = 87.5%). The summary risk effect of EAT on non-dipper blood pressure from six studies comprising1208 patients showed that each 1 mm increment of EAT was associated with a 2.55-fold risk of non-dipper blood pressure. CONCLUSION: Hypertensive patients tend to present higher EAT thickness near the right ventricular wall and increased EAT thickness might be associated with high risk of non-dipper blood pressure. Future researches are warranted to determine the causal link between EAT and hypertension and the underlying mechanism.