Safety and efficacy of the new modified technique for c2 nerve root resection in 3d fluoroscopy navigated instrumentation in the cranio-cervical junction.

PURPOSE: Instrumentation of the C1 vertebra requires either mobilization or transection of the C2 nerve root. This study investigates clinical and radiological outcomes and incidences of C2 neuropathic pain after posterior instrumented fusion in the cranio-cervical junction with or without division of the C2 nerve roots. METHODS: This retrospective study compared two cohorts of patients who underwent instrumented fusion in the cranio-cervical junction. Fifty patients (22 males and 28 females) were operated with complete resection of C2 nerve root ganglion (Ex group), and fifty-one patients (30 men, 21 women) with C2 nerve roots preservation (No group). RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative C2 neuropathy was eight times lower in the Ex group compared to the No group that was statistical significant, p = 0.039. Surgical time was significantly shorter in the No group (p = 0.001). The fusion rates were very high for both groups, without difference between groups (p = 1.0). Autografting from the iliac crest (p = 0.001) as well as postoperative immobilisation with a hard collar (p < 0.001) were required in fewer patients in the Ex group. Also, patients in the Ex group were mobilised faster after surgery (p = 0.49). Overall, complication rates were similar between groups, but the Ex group demonstrated fewer major medical complications (16% vs 31%). Male sex and iliac bone harvesting demonstrated significantly higher OR for development of postoperative complications (p = 0.023 and p = 0.034 respectively) and postoperative mobilization demonstrated significant higher OR for development of postoperative major complications (p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Resection of the C2 nerve root ganglion during posterior instrumented fusion of the cranio-cervical junction is safe and rarely leads to C2 neuropathy. The technique tends to mitigate the odds of developing postoperative complications.

11. Cervicogenic headache and occipital neuralgia.

INTRODUCTION: Cervicogenic headache (CEH) and occipital neuralgia (ON) are headaches originating in the occiput and that radiate to the vertex. Because of the intimate relationship between structures based in the occiput and those in the upper cervical region, there is significant overlap between the presentation of CEH and ON. Diagnosis starts with a headache history to assess for diagnostic criteria formulated by the International Headache Society. Physical examination evaluates range of motion of the neck and the presence of tender areas or pressure points. METHODS: The literature for the diagnosis and treatment of CEH and ON was searched from 2015 through August 2022, retrieved, and summarized. RESULTS: Conservative treatment includes pain education and self-care, analgesic medication, physical therapy (such as reducing secondary muscle tension and improving posture), the use of TENS (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation), or a combination of the aforementioned treatments. Injection at various anatomical locations with local anesthetic with or without corticosteroids can provide pain relief for a short period. Deep cervical plexus block can result in improved pain for less than 6 months. In both CEH and ON, an occipital nerve block can provide important diagnostic information and improve pain in some patients, with PRF providing greater long-term pain control. Radiofrequency ablation of the cervical facet joints can result in improvement for over 1 year. Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) should be considered for the treatment of refractory ON. CONCLUSION: The treatment of CEH preferentially consists of radiofrequency treatment of the facet joints, while for ON, pulsed radiofrequency of the occipital nerves is indicated. For refractory cases, ONS may be considered.

Trans-obliquus inferior capitis course of the greater occipital nerve: A potential cause of occipital neuralgia?

Occipital neuralgia can be due to multiple etiologies. One of these is potential compression of the greater occipital nerve (GON). In this regard, one relationship of the GON, its course through the obliquus inferior capitis muscle (OIC), has yet to be well studied. Therefore, the current anatomical study was performed to elucidate this relationship better. In the prone position, the suboccipital triangle was exposed, and the relationship between the GON and OIC was documented in 72 adult cadavers (144 sides). The GON was found to pierce the OIC on four sides (2.8%), unilaterally in two cadavers and bilaterally in one cadaver. Two cadavers were male, and one was female. Histological samples were taken from GONs with a normal course around the OIC, and nerves were found to pierce the OIC. The GON of all four sides identified histological changes consistent with nerve potential compression (e.g., epineurial and perineurial thickening). This is also the first histological analysis of the trans-OIC course of the GON, demonstrating signs of chronic nerve potential compression. Although uncommon, entrapment of the GON by the OIC may be an underrecognized etiology of occipital neuralgia.

[Guasha-fangsha therapy combined with electroacupuncture in treatment of greater occipital neuralgia: a randomized controlled trial].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical effect of guasha-fangsha (scrapping and bleeding) therapy combined with electroacupuncture (EA) on greater occipital neuralgia. METHODS: Ninety patients with greater occipital neuralgia were randomly divided into an observation group (45 cases) and a control group (45 cases, 2 cases dropped out). In the control group, EA was delivered at Fengfu (GV 16) and bilateral Tianzhu (BL 10), Fengchi (GB 20), Wangu (GB 12), Yuzhen (BL 9) and Houxi (SI 3), with disperse-dense wave, at 2 Hz/100 Hz in frequency and 2 mA to 6 mA in intensity, for 30 min in each intervention, once every other days, 3 times a week. In the observation group, on the basis of the intervention as the control group, guasha-fangsha therapy was used along the distribution of the bladder meridian of foot-taiyang on the occipital region and that of the gallbladder meridian of foot-shaoyang on the lateral side of the head, once weekly. The duration of treatment was 3 weeks in the two groups. In the two groups, before treatment, after 1, 2 and 3 weeks of treatment and in follow-up visit after 3 weeks of treatment completion, the score of visual analogue scale (VAS) was observed; before and after treatment, as well as in follow-up visit after 3 weeks of treatment completion, the scores of self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), self-rating depression scale (SDS) and 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) were observed; after treatment and in follow-up visit after 3 weeks of treatment completion, the clinical efficacy was evaluated. RESULTS: After one week of treatment, the VAS score in the observation group decreased when compared with that before treatment (P<0.05), while the scores in 2 and 3 weeks of treatment and in follow-up visit after 3 weeks of treatment completion were lower than those before treatment in the two groups (P<0.05) separately. At each time point after treatment, the VAS scores in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment and during the follow-up visit, the scores of SAS and SDS decreased when compared with those before treatment in the two groups (P<0.05), and the scores in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05); the scores of each item in SF-36 were elevated in comparison with those before treatment in the two groups (P<0.05), and the scores in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the total effective rate of the observation group was 91.1% (41/45), higher than that (76.7%, 33/43) of the control group (P<0.05). In follow-up visit, the total effective rate of the observation group was 91.1% (41/45), which was higher than 72.1% (31/43) of the control group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Guasha-fangsha therapy combined with electroacupuncture can effectively relieve greater occipital neuralgia, alleviate pain severity, ameliorate anxiety and depression and improve the quality of life in the patients.

Conservative Management of Occipital Neuralgia Supported by Physical Therapy: A Review of Available Research and Mechanistic Rationale to Guide Treatment.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Conservative management is consistently recommended as a first line intervention for occipital neuralgia (ON); however, there is limited clinical research regarding conservative intervention for ON. This lack of research may lead to underutilization or unwarranted variability in conservative treatment. This article provides mechanism-based guidance for conservative management of ON as a component of a multimodal treatment approach, and discusses the role of the physical therapist in the care team. It also highlights opportunities for further research to refine conservative management of this condition. RECENT FINDINGS: Published research on conservative interventions specific to ON is limited to very low-quality evidence for the use of TENS. The contemporary shift toward precision pain management emphasizing treatment based on a patient's constellation of clinical features-a phenotype-rather than solely a diagnosis provides more personalized and specifically targeted pain treatment. This paradigm can guide treatment in cases where diagnosis-specific research is lacking and can be used to inform conservative treatment in this case. Various conservative interventions have demonstrated efficacy in treating many of the symptoms and accepted etiologies of ON. Conservative interventions provided by a physical therapist including exercise, manual therapy, posture and biomechanical training, TENS, patient education, and desensitization have mechanistic justification to treat symptoms and causes of ON. Physical therapists have adequate time and skill to provide such progressive and iterative interventions and should be included in a multimodal treatment plan for ON. Further research is required to determine appropriate dosing, sequencing, and progression of conservative treatments.

Novel Ultrasound-Guided Hydrodissection with 5% Dextrose for the Treatment of Occipital Neuralgia Targeting the Greater Occipital Nerve.

BACKGROUND: Occipital neuralgia is a debilitating condition, and traditional treatments often provide limited or temporary relief. Recently, ultrasound-guided hydrodissection of the greater occipital nerve (GON) has emerged as a promising minimally invasive approach. OBJECTIVES: To describe two novel ultrasound-guided hydrodissections with 5% dextrose for GON and discuss their advantages, disadvantages, and considerations. METHODS: Two cases are reported. Case 1 describes a lateral decubitus approach for hydrodissecting the GON between the semispinalis capitis (SSC) and obliquus capitis inferior (OCI) muscles. Case 2 details a cranial-to-caudal approach for hydrodissecting the GON within the SSC and upper trapezius (UT) muscles when the GON passes through these two muscles. RESULTS: Both patients experienced significant and sustained pain relief with improvements in function. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided GON hydrodissection using 5% dextrose is a promising treatment for occipital neuralgia. The lateral decubitus and cranial-caudal approaches provide additional options to address patient-specific anatomical considerations and preferences.

Atypical refractory occipital neuralgia treated with a unilateral dual-lead occipital nerve stimulator: a case report.

Aim: To describe the successful treatment of atypical occipital neuralgia (ON) using a unilateral dual-lead occipital nerve stimulator.Setting: Outpatient clinic/operating room.Patient: A 53-year-old male with atypical ON.Case description: Patient was previously diagnosed with treatment-refractory left-sided trigeminal neuralgia with atypical occipital distribution. On presentation, his symptoms were consistent with ON with distribution to the left fronto-orbital area. He received a left-sided nerve stimulator implant targeting both the greater and lesser occipital nerves.Results: Patient reported pain relief from a numerical rating scale 10/10 to 3-4/10.Conclusion: ON with referred ipsilateral trigeminal distribution should be considered when patients present with simultaneous facial and occipital pain. Further, a dual-lead unilateral stimulator approach may be a viable treatment.

Atypical, persistent inflammation to the left occipital nerve treated with a neuromodulator: a case reportAim: To describe the successful treatment of atypical headache using a one-sided nerve stimulator.Setting: Outpatient clinic/operating room.Patient: A 53-year-old male with atypical headache.Case description: Patient was previously diagnosed with left-sided chronic facial pain with pain to the back of the head. He previously failed to improve with medication and underwent Botox injections and several surgical operations targeting the nerves responsible for his pain symptoms with no improvement. He recently underwent a nerve-stimulating device trial, designed to alter the activity levels of the targeted nerve, that targeted a nerve in the back of his head. This significantly improved his pain and he ultimately presented for an official stimulator implant. Upon presentation, his symptoms were consistent with left-sided headache to the back of the head with distribution to the left eye area.Results: Patient reported significant pain relief from 10/10 to a 3-4/10, with a 10 representing the worst pain the patient has ever felt.Conclusion: Left-sided headache on the back of the head that can distribute to the left eye area should be a consistent thought for pain/headache practitioners. Further, this stimulator placement approach may be a viable treatment.

Aetiologies of iatrogenic occipital nerve injury and outcomes following treatment with nerve decompression surgery.

INTRODUCTION: This study analyzed the etiologies and treatment of iatrogenic occipital nerve injuries. METHODS: Patients with occipital neuralgia (ON) who were screened for occipital nerve decompression surgery were prospectively enrolled. Patients with iatrogenic occipital nerve injuries who underwent nerve decompression surgery were identified. Data included surgical history, pain characteristics, and surgical technique. Outcomes included pain frequency (days/month), duration (h/day), intensity (0-10), migraine headache index (MHI), and patient-reported percent-resolution of pain. RESULTS: Among the 416 patients with ON, who were screened for occipital nerve decompression surgery, 12 (2.9%) cases of iatrogenic occipital nerve injury were identified and underwent surgical treatment. Preoperative headache frequency was 30 (±0.0) days/month, duration was 19.4 (±6.9) h, and intensity was 9.2 (±0.9). Neuroma excision was performed in 5 cases followed by targeted muscle reinnervation in 3, nerve cap in 1, and muscle burial in 1. In patients without neuromas, greater occipital nerve decompression and/or lesser occipital nerve neurectomy were performed. At the median follow-up of 12 months (IQR 12-12 months), mean pain frequency was 4.0 (±6.6) pain days/month (p < 0.0001), duration was 6.3 (±8.9) h (p < 0.01), and intensity was 4.4 (±2.8) (p < 0.001). Median patient-reported resolution of pain was 85% (56.3%-97.5%) and success rate was (≥50% MHI improvement) 91.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Iatrogenic occipital nerve injuries can be caused by various surgical interventions, including craniotomies, cervical spine interventions, and scalp tumor resections. The associated pain can be severe and chronic. Iatrogenic ON should be considered in the differential diagnosis of post-operative headaches and can be treated with nerve decompression surgery or neuroma excision with reconstruction of the free nerve end.

Four Decades of Occipital Nerve Stimulation for Headache Disorders: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chronic headaches are a significant source of disability worldwide. Despite the development of conventional strategies, a subset of patients remain refractory and/or experience side effects following these treatments. Hence, occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) should be considered as an alternative strategy for intractable chronic headaches. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the effectiveness, safety, mechanisms and practical application of ONS for the treatment of headache disorders. RECENT FINDINGS: Overall response rate of ONS is 35.7-100%, 17-100%, and 63-100% in patients with cluster headache, chronic migraine and occipital neuralgia respectively. Regarding the long-term effectivity in all groups, 41.6-88.0% of patients remain responders after ≥ 18.3 months. The most frequently reported adverse events include lead migration/fracture (13%) and local pain (7.3%). Based on our results, ONS can be considered a safe and effective treatment for chronic intractable headache disorders. To support more widespread application of ONS, additional research with larger sample sizes should be conducted.

Ultrasound guided platelet rich plasma injections for post-traumatic greater occipital neuralgia following concussion: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Background: Treatment for post-traumatic greater occipital neuralgia (GON) includes serial injections of steroid/anesthetic. While these injections can alleviate pain, effects can be transient, frequently lasting only 1 month. As a potential alternative, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections are an emerging biological treatment with beneficial effects in peripheral nerve disorders. We investigated the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of a single PRP injection for post-traumatic GON in comparison to saline or steroid/anesthetic injection. Methods: In this pilot randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, 32 adults with post-traumatic GON were allocated 1:1:1 to receive a single ultrasound-guided injection of (1) autologous PRP (2) steroid/anesthetic or (3) normal saline. Our primary outcome was feasibility (recruitment, attendance, retention) and safety (adverse events). Exploratory measures included headache intensity and frequency (daily headache diaries) and additional questionnaires (headache impact, and quality of life) assessed at pre-injection, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post-injection. Results: We screened 67 individuals, 55% were eligible and 95% of those participated. Over 80% of daily headache diaries were completed with 91% of participants completing the 3-month outcome questionnaires. No serious adverse events were reported. There were no significant differences between groups for headache intensity or frequency. Headache impact on function test-6 scores improved at 3 month in the PRP (ß = -9.7, 95% CI [-15.6, -3.74], p = 0.002) and saline (ß = -6.7 [-12.7, -0.57], p = 0.033) groups but not steroid/anesthetic group (p = 0.135). Conclusion: PRP is a feasible and safe method for treating post-traumatic GON with comparable results to saline and steroid/anaesthetic. Further trials with larger sample sizes are required.Clinical trial registration:https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT04051203.

Pulsed Radiofrequency Neuromodulation of the Greater Occipital Nerve for the Treatment of Headache Disorders in Adults: A Systematic Review.

Background: Pulsed radiofrequency neuromodulation (PRFN) of greater occipital nerve (GON) is considered in patients with headaches failing to achieve sustained analgesic benefit from nerve blocks with local anesthetic and steroids. However, the evidence supporting this practice is unclear. Aims: This narrative systematic review aims to explore the effectiveness and safety of GON PRFN on headaches. Methods: Databases were searched for studies, published up to February 1, 2024, investigating PRFN of GON for adults with headaches. Abstracts and posters were excluded. Primary outcome was change in headache intensity. Secondary outcomes included effect on monthly headache frequency (MHF), mental and physical health, mood, sleep, analgesic consumption, and side-effects. Two reviewers screened and extracted data. Results: Twenty-two papers (2 randomized controlled trials (RCT), 11 cohort, and 9 case reports/series) including 608 patients were identified. Considerable heterogeneity in terms of study design, headache diagnosis, PRF target and settings, and image-guidance was noted. PRFN settings varied (38-42°C, 40-60 V, and 150-400 Ohms). Studies demonstrated PRFN to provide significant analgesia and reduction of MHF in chronic migraine (CM) from 3 to 6 months; and significant pain relief for ON from six to ten months. Mild adverse effects were reported in 3.1% of cohort. A minority of studies reported on secondary outcomes. The quality of the evidence was low. Conclusions: Low-quality evidence indicates an analgesic benefit from PRFN of GON for ON and CM, but its role for other headache types needs more investigation. Optimal PRFN target and settings remain unclear. High-quality RCTs are required to further explore the role of this intervention. PROSPERO ID CRD42022363234.

Contexte: La neuromodulation par radiofréquence pulsée (NRFP) du nerf grand occipital (NGO) est envisagée chez les patients souffrant de céphalées qui ne parviennent pas à obtenir un bénéfice analgésique durable à partir des blocages nerveux à l'aide d'un anesthésique local et de stéroïdes. Cependant, les données probantes à l'appui de cette pratique ne sont pas claires.Objectifs: Cette revue systématique narrative vise à explorer l'efficacité et la sécurité de la NRFP du NGO sur les maux de téte.Méthodes: Des bases de données ont été consultées pour trouver des études, publiées jusqu'au 1er février 2024, portant sur la NRFP du NGO chez des adultes souffrant de céphalées. Les résumés et les affiches ont été exclus. Le critére principal était le changement dans l'intensité des maux de téte. Les critéres secondaires comprenaient l'effet sur la fréquence mensuelle des céphalées, la santé mentale et physique, l'humeur, le sommeil, la consommation d'analgésiques et les effets secondaires. Deux examinateurs ont évalué et extrait les données.Résultats: Vingt-deux articles (2 essais contrôlés randomisés, 11 cohortes et 9 rapports de cas/séries) portant sur 608 patients ont été recensés. Une hétérogénéité considérable a été observée en termes de devis de l'étude, de diagnostic des céphalées, de la cible et des paramétres de la FRP et de l'orientation de l'image. Les réglages de la NRFP variaient (38-42°C, 40-60 V, et 150-400 Ohms). Les études ont démontré que la NRFP procurait une analgésie significative et réduisait la fréquence des céphalées dans la migraine chronique de trois à six mois, et un soulagement significatif de la douleur pour la névralgie occipitale pendant six à dix mois. Des effets indésirables légers ont été signalés dans 3,1 % des participants de la cohorte. Une minorité déétudes ont fait état de résultats secondaires. La qualité des données probantes était faible.Conclusions: Les données probantes de faible qualité indiquent un bénéfice analgésique de la NRFP du NGO pour la névralgie occipitale et la migraine chronique, mais son rôle pour d'autres types de céphalées doit être davantage étudié. La cible et les paramétres optimaux de la NRFP restent floues. Des essais contrôlés randomisés de haute qualité sont nécessaires pour explorer davantage le rôle de cette intervention.

Surgical Management of Headache Disorders - A Systematic Review of the Literature.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review article critically evaluates the latest advances in the surgical treatment of headache disorders. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of innovative screening tools, such as doppler ultrasound, pain drawings, magnetic resonance neurography, and nerve blocks to help identify candidates for surgery. Machine learning has emerged as a powerful tool to predict surgical outcomes. In addition, advances in surgical techniques, including minimally invasive incisions, fat injections, and novel strategies to treat injured nerves (neuromas) have demonstrated promising results. Lastly, improved patient-reported outcome measures are evolving to provide a framework for comparison of conservative and invasive treatment outcomes. Despite these developments, challenges persist, particularly related to appropriate patient selection, insurance coverage, delays in diagnosis and surgical treatment, and the absence of standardized measures to assess and compare treatment impact. Collaboration between medical/procedural and surgical specialties is required to overcome these obstacles.

Localization of the greater occipital nerve through palpation of bony landmarks: A cadaveric study.

OBJECTIVE: to provide anatomic confirmation that standard methods which practitioners skilled in palpation use, can reliably identify the most likely site of emergence of the greater occipital nerve in most patients. The location and frequency of subcutaneous emergence of the greater occipital nerve and occipital artery with respect to the external occipital protuberance-mastoid line are reported. METHODS: The external occipital protuberance and the mastoid processes were identified by palpation bilaterally on 57 body donors and the medial trisection point of a line connecting these bony landmarks was identified. A 4 cm circular dissection guide divided into 4 quadrants was centered on the trisection point and used to guide the removal of a circle of skin. The in-situ location of the nerve and artery were exposed by deep dissection within the circle. The frequency of the emergence and occurrence of the nerve and artery by quadrant were analyzed. RESULTS: In 114 total dissections the greater occipital nerve was found to emerge within the circle 96 times (84%) and the occipital artery 100 times (88%). The nerve (90%) and artery (81%) emerged from the two inferior quadrants most of the time with no difference noted between male and female donors. The greater occipital nerve and occipital artery were found to emerge together most commonly in inferior lateral quadrant. Branches of the nerve and artery traveled together most frequently through the two lateral quadrants. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed that the medial trisection point of the external occipital protuberance-mastoid line can be located via palpation and reliably used to pinpoint the subcutaneous emergence of the greater occipital nerve and occipital artery in most individuals. When relying on palpation alone to identify the trisection point in the clinic, infusion of nerve block inferior and lateral to this point is most likely to bathe the greater occipital nerve in anesthetic.

Occipital nerve stimulation in pediatric patients with refractory occipital neuralgia.

PURPOSE: Occipital neuralgia (ON) is a disabling problem within the pediatric population. Many of these patients fail medical therapies and continue to suffer without further surgical management. Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) is used to treat ON in the adult population leading to a 72-89% reduction in pain; however, there are limited studies regarding its use in the pediatric population. In this study, we examined the outcomes of ONS in pediatric patients with medically refractory ON. METHODS: We performed a chart review of pediatric patients at our institution who have undergone ONS for the same indications. RESULTS: We identified 3 patients at our institution who underwent ONS trial and/or permanent implantation for ON. One patient had complete pain relief after the trial and declined permanent implantation. The other patient had fewer attacks compared to his pre-trial baseline and controlled them by adjusting his permanent implant stimulation settings. The last patient had near complete relief of her symptoms and no longer required any pain medication. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the paucity of studies evaluating the utility of ONS in the pediatric ON population. Limited data from both the literature and our institution's experience reveal that pediatric patients may benefit from trial and/or permanent implantation of ONS for medically refractory ON pain.

The Postconcussion Syndrome and Posttraumatic Headaches in Civilians, Soldiers, and Athletes.

Posttraumatic headaches are one of the most common and controversial secondary headache types. After a mild traumatic brain, an estimated 11% to 82% of people develop a postconcussion syndrome, which has been controversial for more than 160 years. Headache is estimated as present in 30% to 90% of patients after a mild head injury. Most headaches are tension-type-like or migraine-like. Headaches in civilians, soldiers, athletes, and postcraniotomy are reviewed. The treatments are the same as for the primary headaches. Persistent posttraumatic headaches can continue for many years.

Neuralgia in the occipital region associated with ipsilateral trigeminal herpes zoster: Three case reports.

BACKGROUND: Nerve fibers related to pain and temperature sensation in the trigeminal nerve territory converge with the upper cervical spinal nerves from the level of the lower medulla oblongata to the upper cervical cord. This structure is called the trigemino-cervical complex and may cause referred pain in the territory of the trigeminal or upper cervical spinal nerves. CASE SERIES: Here, we report three cases of paroxysmal neuralgia in the occipital region with mild conjunctivitis or a few reddish spots in the ipsilateral trigeminal nerve territory. The patients exhibited gradual progression of these reddish spots evolving into vesicles over the course of several days, despite the absence of a rash in the occipital region. The patients were diagnosed with trigeminal herpes zoster and subsequently received antiherpetic therapy. Remarkably, the neuralgia in the occipital region showed gradual amelioration or complete resolution before the treatment, with no sequelae reported in the occipital region. DISCUSSION: The trigemino-cervical complex has the potential to cause neuralgia in the occipital region, as referred pain, caused by trigeminal herpes zoster. These cases suggest that, even if conjunctivitis or reddish spots appear to be trivial in the trigeminal nerve territory, trigeminal herpes zoster should be considered when neuralgia occurs in the ipsilateral occipital region.

Comprehensive Criteria for Differential Diagnosis and a Surgical Management Algorithm for Occipital Neuralgia and Migraine Headaches.

The differential diagnoses and nuances of the surgical management of occipital migraine and occipital neuralgia have not been clearly discussed in the available literature. This study aims to highlight additional diagnostic features and offers an algorithm for the surgical treatment of occipital migraine and occipital neuralgia based on the vast experience of the senior author spanning over 23 years. A retrospective cohort study was conducted to review the number and distribution of patients who underwent surgical treatment for occipital migraine headaches and neuralgia and the signs and symptoms observed. Among the 660 patients who underwent surgical treatment for headaches within the territory of the greater occipital nerves, 86 patients underwent isolated deactivation of the greater occipital site (site IV) or combined greater and lesser occipital sites (site IV and site VI surgical). Within the isolated occipital headache group, 43 patients met the criteria for migraine headaches and 43 for occipital neuralgia. Our additional observation on the differences between the occipital neuralgia and migraine groups included that occipital neuralgia is more commonly unilateral, less commonly familial, and more commonly associated with a whiplash-type injury. In addition, the patient with occipital neuralgia can consistently identify the distinct point of pain using the index finger. An ultrasound Doppler signal can also be detected at the pain site and a pulse is often palpable in the site identified by the patient. Occipital neuralgia is also commonly continuous and unrelenting, with occasional spikes of shooting pain, and is less likely to respond to botulinum toxin-A injection. Patients with occipital neuralgia often have a single-site headache while patients with migraine headaches often suffer from headaches in multiple sites. Additional clinical criteria are offered for the differential diagnosis of occipital migraine headaches and occipital neuralgia based on the vast experience of the senior author and the developed surgical management algorithm.

A surgical decision aid for occipital neuralgia with literature review and single center case series.

BACKGROUND: Occipital neuralgia (ON) is a debilitating headache disorder. Due to the rarity of this disorder and lack of high-level evidence, a clear framework for choosing the optimal surgical approach for medically refractory ON incorporating shared decision making with patients does not exist. METHODS: A literature review of studies reporting pain outcomes of patients who underwent surgical treatment for ON was performed, as well as a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent surgery for ON within our institution. RESULTS: Thirty-two articles met the inclusion criteria. A majority of the articles were retrospective case series (22/32). The mean number of patients across the studies was 34 (standard deviation (SD) 39). Among the 13 studies that reported change in pain score on 10-point scales, a study of 20 patients who had undergone C2 and/or C3 ganglionectomies reported the greatest reduction in pain intensity after surgery. The studies evaluating percutaneous ablative methods including radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation showed the smallest reduction in pain scores overall. At our institution from 2014 to 2023, 11 patients received surgical treatment for ON with a mean follow-up of 187 days (SD 426). CONCLUSION: Based on these results, the first decision aid for selecting a surgical approach to medically refractory ON is presented. The algorithm prioritizes nerve sparing followed by non-nerve sparing techniques with the incorporation of patient preference. Shared decision making is critical in the treatment of ON given the lack of clear scientific evidence regarding the superiority of a particular surgical method.

Refractory occipital neuralgia treatment with nerve decompression surgery: a case series.

Background: The management of refractory occipital neuralgia (ON) can be challenging. Selection criteria for occipital nerve decompression surgery are not well defined in terms of clinical features and best preoperative medical management. Methods: In total, 15 patients diagnosed with ON by a board-certified, fellowship-trained headache specialist and referred to a plastic surgeon for nerve decompression surgery were prospectively enrolled. All subjects received trials of occipital nerve blocks (NB), at least three preventive medications, and onabotulinum toxin (BTX) prior to surgery before referral to a plastic surgeon. Treatment outcomes included headache frequency (headache days/month), intensity (0-10), duration (h), and response to medication/injectable therapies at 12 months postoperatively. Results: Preoperatively, median headache days/month was 30 (20-30), intensity 8 (8-10), and duration 24 h (12-24). Patients trialed 10 (±5.8) NB and 11.7 (±9) BTX cycles. Postoperatively, headache frequency was 5 (0-16) days/month (p < 0.01), intensity was 4 (0-6) (p < 0.01), and duration was 10 (0-24) h (p < 0.01). Median patient-reported percent resolution of ON headaches was 80% (70-85%). All patients reported improvement of comorbid headache disorders, most commonly migraine, and a reduction, discontinuation, or increased effectiveness of medications, NB and BTX. Conclusion: All patients who underwent treatment for refractory ON by a headache specialist and plastic surgeon benefited from nerve decompression surgery in various degrees. The collaborative selection criteria employed in this study may be replicable in clinical practice.