Anatomical Step-by-Step Dissection of Complex Skull Base Approaches for Trainees: Surgical Anatomy of the Endoscopic Endonasal Middle-Inferior Clivectomy, Odontoidectomy, and Far-Medial Approach.

Introduction The clival, paraclival, and craniocervical junction regions are challenging surgical targets. To approach these areas, endoscopic endonasal transclival approaches (EETCAs) and their extensions (far-medial approach and odontoidectomy) have gained popularity as they obviate manipulating and working between neurovascular structures. Although several cadaveric studies have further refined these contemporary approaches, few provide a detailed step-by-step description. Thus, we aim to didactically describe the steps of the EETCAs and their extensions for trainees. Methods Six formalin-fixed cadaveric head specimens were dissected. All specimens were latex-injected using a six-vessel technique. Endoscopic endonasal middle and inferior clivectomies, far-medial approaches, and odontoidectomy were performed. Results Using angled endoscopes and surgical instruments, an endoscopic endonasal midclivectomy and partial inferior clivectomy were performed without nasopharyngeal tissue disruption. To complete the inferior clivectomy, far-medial approach, and partially remove the anterior arch of C1 and odontoid process, anteroinferior transposition of the Eustachian-nasopharynx complex was required by transecting pterygosphenoidal fissure tissue, but incision in the nasopharynx was not necessary. Full exposure of the craniocervical junction necessitated bilateral sharp incision and additional inferior mobilization of the posterior nasopharynx. Unobstructed access to neurovascular anatomy of the ventral posterior fossa and craniocervical junction was provided. Conclusion EETCAs are a powerful tool for the skull-base surgeon as they offer a direct corridor to the ventral posterior fossa and craniocervical junction unobstructed by eloquent neurovasculature. To facilitate easier understanding of the EETCAs and their extensions for trainees, we described the anatomy and surgical nuances in a didactic and step-by-step fashion.

Endoscopic Endonasal Occipitocervical Fixation with a Customized Three-Dimensional Printed Titanium Plate-Screw Construct: A Cadaveric Feasibility Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of a novel method for occipitocervical fixation (OCF) through the endonasal corridor. METHODS: Thin-cut computed tomography scans were obtained for 5 cadaveric specimens. Image segmentation was used to reconstruct 3D models of each O-C1 joint complex. Using computer-aided design software, plates were custom-designed to span each O-C1 joint, sit flush onto the bony surface, and accommodate screws. The final models were 3D-printed in titanium. For implantation, specimens were held in pin-fixation and registered to neuronavigation. A rigid 0º endoscope was used for endonasal visualization. An inverted U-shaped nasopharyngeal flap was raised to expose the occipital condyles and C1. The plates were introduced and fixed with bone screws. Computed tomography scans were obtained to assess screw accuracy and proximity to critical neurovascular structures. Screw entry points and trajectories were recorded. RESULTS: Endonasal OCF was performed on 5 cadaveric specimens. The mean starting point for occipital condyle screws was 6.17 mm lateral and 5.38 mm rostral to the medial O-C1 joint. Mean axial and sagittal trajectories were 7.98° and 6.71°, respectively. The mean starting point for C1 screws was 16.11 mm lateral to the C1 anterior tubercle and 6.39 mm caudal to the medial O-C1 joint. Mean axial and sagittal trajectories were 10.97° and -9.91°, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Endonasal OCF is technically and anatomically feasible. The application of this technique may allow for same-stage endonasal decompression and fixation, offering a minimally invasive alternative to current methods of fixation and advancing surgeons' ability to treat pathology of the craniovertebral junction. Next steps will focus on biomechanical testing.

Subluxación atlantoaxial en artritis reumatoidea. Resolución por odontoidectomía endonasal endoscópica y fusión e instrumentación por abordaje posterior. Reporte de caso

La subluxación atlantoaxial es la lesión más frecuente en la columna cervical causada por la artritis reumatoidea. Se manifiesta por rigidez de nuca, dolor cervical y déficit neurológico. El diagnóstico se realiza con tomografía computarizada e imágenes de resonancia magnética. El intervalo atlanto dental anterior mayor a 5mm indica inestabilidad atlantoaxial, el intervalo atlanto dental posterior menor a 14mm advierte riesgo neurológico. Las indicaciones más frecuentes de cirugía son: dolor cervical severo, inestabilidad y síntomas de mielopatía. Cuando existe compresión medular es necesaria la descompresión cervical alta sea por vía posterior o por vía anterior (odontoidectomía endonasal versus transoral). La línea rinopalatina nos indicará la factibilidad de una odontoidectomía endonasal endoscópica (OEE). El objetivo de la presentación del presente caso es compartir nuestra experiencia con la primera odontoidectomía endonasal endoscópica realizada en nuestro país y fomentar la utilización de la técnica. La cirugía fue realizada en un paciente con cuadriparesia espástica por subluxación atlantoaxial por artritis reumatoidea y que presentó excelente evolución pos operatoria, con recuperación casi completa. La OEE es una técnica operatoria mínimamente invasiva, ideal para pacientes con múltiples comorbilidades y que ofrece de buenos a excelentes resultados.

Atlantoaxial subluxation is the most common injury to the cervical spine caused by rheumatoid arthritis. It is manifested by neck stiffness, neck pain and neurological deficit. Diagnosis is made with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. The anterior dental atlanto interval greater than 5mm indicates atlantoaxial instability, the posterior dental atlanto interval less than 14mm warns of neurological risk. The most frequent indications for surgery are: severe neck pain, instability and symptoms of myelopathy. When there is spinal cord compression, upper cervical decompression is necessary, either via a posterior or anterior approach (endonasal versus transoral odontoidectomy). The rhinopalatine line will indicate the feasibility of an endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy (EEO). The objective of the presentation of this case is to share our experience with the first endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy performed in our country and to promote the use of the technique. The surgery was performed on a patient with spastic quadriparesis due to atlantoaxial subluxation due to rheumatoid arthritis and who presented excellent postoperative evolution, with almost complete recovery. EEO is a minimally invasive surgical technique, ideal for patients with multiple comorbidities and offering good to excellent results.

Endoscopic endonasal approach for resection of odontoid process, decompression of the cervicomedullary junction spinal cord, and resection of pannus.

Odontoid pannus is an abnormal collection of degenerative or inflammatory tissue on the C1-dens joint that can result in severe spinal cord compression myelopathy. Treatment options vary depending on severity and etiology. In cases of severe cord compression, surgical management could be either through a purely posterior approach or in combination with an anterior decompression via endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA). This case presents a 77-year-old female who underwent posterior cervical fixation for odontoid pannus causing dramatic cervical myelopathy who failed to improve over a 6-month period and required anterior transodontoid pannus resection and decompression via EEA. The video can be found here: https://stream.cadmore.media/r10.3171/2024.1.FOCVID23176.

A novel classification and management scheme for craniocervical junction disorders with ventral neural element compression.

OBJECTIVE: Craniocervical junction (CCJ) pathologies with ventral neural element compression are poorly understood, and appropriate management requires accurate understanding, description, and a more uniform nomenclature. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients to identify anatomical clusters and better classify CCJ disorders with ventral compression and guide treatment. METHODS: A retrospective review of adult and pediatric patients with ventral CCJ compression from 2008 to 2022 at a single center was performed. The incidence of anatomical abnormalities and compressive etiologies was assessed. Surgical approach, radiographic data, and outcomes were recorded. Association rules analysis (ARA) was used to assess variable clustering. RESULTS: Among 51 patients, the main causes of compression were either purely bony (retroflexed dens [n = 18]; basilar invagination [BI; n = 13]) or soft tissue (degenerative pannus [n = 16]; inflammatory pannus [n = 2]). The primary cluster in ARA was a retroflexed dens, platybasia, and Chiari malformation (CM), and the secondary cluster was BI, C1-2 subluxation, and reducibility. These, along with degenerative pannus, formed the three major classes. In assessing the optimal treatment strategy, reducibility was evaluated. Of the BI cases, 12 of the 13 patients had anterolisthesis of C1 that was potentially reducible, compared with 2 of the 18 patients with a retroflexed dens (both with concomitant BI), and no pannus cases. The mean C1-2 facet angle was significantly higher in BI at 32.4°, compared with -2.3° in retroflexed dens and 8.1° in degenerative pannus (p < 0.05). Endonasal decompression with posterior fixation was performed in 48 (94.0%) of the 51 patients, whereas posterior reduction/fixation alone was performed in 3 patients (6.0%). Of 16 reducible cases, open posterior reduction alone was successful in 3 (60.0%) of 5 cases, with all successes containing isolated BI. Reduction was not attempted if vertebral anatomy was unfavorable (n = 9) or the C1 lateral mass was absent (n = 5). The mean follow-up was 28 months. Symptoms improved in 88.9% of patients and were stable in the remaining 11.1%. Tracheostomy and percutaneous G-tube placement occurred in 7.8% and 11.8% of patients, respectively. Reoperation for an endonasal CSF leak repair or posterior cervical wound revision both occurred in 3.9% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: In classifying, one cluster caused decreased posterior fossa volume due to an anatomical triad of retroflexed dens, platybasia, and CM. The second cluster caused pannus formation due to degenerative hypertrophy. For both, endonasal decompression with posterior fixation was ideal. The third group contained C1 anterolisthesis characterized by a steep C1-2 facet angle causing reducible BI. Posterior reduction/fixation is the first-line treatment when anatomically feasible or endonasal decompression with in situ posterior fixation when anatomical constraints exist.

Lesson learned in endoscopic endonasal dens resection for C1-C2 spinal cord decompression.

PURPOSE: Endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is the safest and most effective technique for odontoidectomy. Nevertheless, this kind of approach is yet not largely widespread. The aim of this study is to share with the scientific community some tips and tricks with our ten-year-old learned experience in endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy (EEO), which remains a challenging surgical approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our case series consists of twenty-one (10 males, 11 females; age range of 34-84 years) retrospectively analyzed patients with ventral spinal cord compression for non-reducible CVJ malformation, treated with EEA from July 2011 to March 2019. RESULTS: The results have recently been reported in a previous paper. The only intraoperative complication observed was intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak (9.5%), without any sign of post-operative CSF leak. CONCLUSIONS: Considering our experience, EEO represents a valid and safe technique to decompress neural cervical structures. Despite its technical complexity, mainly due to the use of endoscope and the challenging surgical area, with this study we encourage the use of EEO displaying our experience-based surgical tips and tricks.

Transtubular Transoral Approach for Irreducible Ventral Craniovertebral Junction Compressive Pathologies: Surgical Technique and Outcome.

Introduction: To investigate the use of a tubular retractor to provide access to the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) sparing the soft palate with the aim of reducing complications associated with traditional transoral approach but yet allowing adequate decompression of the CVJ. Materials and methods: Twelve consecutive patients with severe myelopathy (JOA-score less than 11) from ventral CVJ compression were operated between 2014-2020 using a tubular retractor assisted transoral decompression. Results: All patients improved neurologically statistically (p=0.02). There were no posterior pharynx wound infections or rhinolalia. There was one case with incomplete removal of the lateral wall of odontoid and one incidental durotomy. Conclusions: A Tubular retractor provides adequate access for decompression of the ventral compression of CVJ. As the tubular retractor pushed away the uvula, soft palate and pillars of the tonsils as it docked on the posterior pharyngeal wall, the traditional complications associated with traditional transoral procedures is completely avoided.

Case report of bilateral middle ear effusion requiring myringotomy and tube placement following inferior U-shaped nasopharyngeal flap elevation for endonasal odontoidectomy: investigation of causality.

We describe a patient with symptomatic os odontoideum and a previous history of C1-2 wiring who underwent successful treatment with a staged endonasal odontoidectomy and C1-2 revision of instrumentation. Access to the odontoid process was gained through the endonasal corridor using an inverted U-shaped nasopharyngeal flap (IUNF). Post-operatively, the patient experienced resolution of her presenting neurologic symptoms but developed conductive hearing loss secondary to bilateral middle ear effusion, requiring bilateral myringotomy and tube placement 3 months post-operatively. We hypothesize this dysfunction may have resulted from surgical edema, packing buttressing the IUNF, or some combination thereof. In this manuscript, we review the evolution of the nasopharyngeal exposure for odontoidectomy and whether an IUNF may predispose to this complication.

[Minimally invasive surgery for invaginated CII odontoid process]. / Miniinvazivnaya khirurgiya invaginirovannogo zubovidnogo otrostka CII pozvonka.

Odontoidectomy is indicated for anterior compression of the brainstem by invaginated odontoid process. This procedure can currently be performed via transoral microsurgical and transnasal endoscopic access. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the results of endoscopic transnasal odontoidectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We assessed treatment outcomes in 10 patients with anterior compression of the brainstem by invaginated odontoid process. All patients underwent endoscopic transnasal odontoidectomy. RESULTS: Brainstem decompression was achieved in all cases. CONCLUSION: Currently, endoscopic transnasal approach is gradually replacing the transoral one in some patients requiring anterior odontoidectomy. Analysis of literature data reflects the development of this technique taking into account various features of surgical treatment including optimization of dimensions of surgical field, attempts to perform C1-sparing surgeries and analysis of sufficient size of trepanation. Nasopalatine and nasoclival lines are used to select optimal access. Nevertheless, the choice of access depends on equipment of the hospital and surgical experience in most cases.

Endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy for basilar invagination in children: Literature review and case report.

BACKGROUND: Basilar invagination (BI) is an uncommon clinical condition of the craniocervical junction (CCJ). Surgical management depends on 2 factors: mobility and reducibility; in cases of irreducible dislocation or persistent compression, odontoidectomy should be considered. CASE DISCUSSION: We present the case of a 13-year-old boy with severe BI, causing cervical myelopathy with progressive gait disorder. The patient underwent cervical traction followed by posterior decompression and occipitocervical fusion. Postoperatively, symptoms initially improved, until new neurological deterioraton set in 4 months later. Follow-up neuroimaging showed compression of the bulbo-medullary junction, with severe brainstem kinking and appearance of a cervical syrinx. Secondary surgery via an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) was deemed necessary to relieve the compression. Postoperative course was unremarkable, with steady clinical improvement and a return to independent activities of daily living within 6 months. LITERATURE REVIEW: A systematic literature review indicated that EEA conserves the palate and oropharynx mucosae, thus causing less airway and swallowing complications than the transoral approach. CONCLUSION: In selected cases with persistent anterior compression, odontoidectomy on EEA is a safe, effective and valid alternative for managing CCJ pathology.

Single-institution comparative analysis for odontoid resection: posterior transaxis versus anterior transnasal approach.

OBJECTIVE: The resection of an upwardly migrated odontoid is most widely performed via an anterior endoscopic endonasal approach after the addition of posterior occipitocervical instrumentation. In patients with craniovertebral junction (CVJ) anomalies like basilar invagination (BI), surgery is usually achieved in two separate stages. However, the authors have recently introduced a novel posterior transaxis approach in which all the therapeutic goals of the surgery can be safely and effectively accomplished in a single-stage procedure. The aim of the current study was to compare the widely used anterior and the recently introduced posterior approaches on the basis of objective clinical results in patients who underwent odontoid resection for BI. METHODS: Patients with BI who had undergone odontoid resection were retrospectively reviewed in two groups. The first group (n = 7) consisted of patients who underwent anterior odontoidectomy via the standard anterior transnasal route, and the second group (n = 6) included patients in whom the novel transaxis approach was performed. Patient characteristics, neurological conditions, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at admission were evaluated. Operative time, changes in intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, blood loss during surgery, odontoid resection rate, postoperative complications, and mortality were compared between the patient groups. RESULTS: Data were retrospectively reviewed for 13 patients who underwent odontoid resection, posterior CVJ decompression, and occipitocervical instrumentation at the Ankara University School of Medicine Department of Neurosurgery between 2009 and 2022. In the first group (n = 7), patients who underwent anterior odontoidectomy via the standard endonasal route, two serious complications were observed, pneumocephaly and basilar artery injury. In the second group (n = 6), patients in whom the novel transaxis approach was performed, only one complication was observed, occipital plate malposition. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the results of what is to the authors' knowledge the first comparison of a novel approach with a widely used surgical approach to odontoid resection in patients with BI. The preliminary data support the successful utility of the transaxis approach for odontoid resection that meets all the operative therapeutic demands in a single-stage operation. Considering the diminished surgical risks and operative time, the transaxis approach may be regarded as a primary approach for the treatment of BI.

Endoscopic odontoidectomy for brainstem compression in association with posterior fossa decompression and occipitocervical fusion.

OBJECTIVE: Endonasal endoscopic odontoidectomy (EEO) is an alternative to transoral surgery for symptomatic ventral compression of the anterior cervicomedullary junction (CMJ), allowing for earlier extubation and feeding. Because the procedure destabilizes the C1-2 ligamentous complex, posterior cervical fusion is often performed concomitantly. The authors' institutional experience was reviewed to describe the indications, outcomes, and complications in a large series of EEO surgical procedures in which EEO was combined with posterior decompression and fusion. METHODS: A consecutive, prospective series of patients who underwent EEO between 2011 and 2021 was studied. Demographic and outcome metrics, radiographic parameters, extent of ventral compression, extent of dens removal, and increase in CSF space ventral to the brainstem were measured on the preoperative and postoperative scans (first and most recent scans). RESULTS: Forty-two patients (26.2% pediatric) underwent EEO: 78.6% had basilar invagination, and 76.2% had Chiari type I malformation. The mean ± SD age was 33.6 ± 3.0 years, with a mean follow-up of 32.3 ± 4.0 months. The majority of patients (95.2%) underwent posterior decompression and fusion immediately before EEO. Two patients underwent prior fusion. There were 7 intraoperative CSF leaks but no postoperative CSF leaks. The inferior limit of decompression fell between the nasoaxial and rhinopalatine lines. The mean ± SD vertical height of dens resection was 11.98 ± 0.45 mm, equivalent to a mean ± SD resection of 74.18% ± 2.56%. The mean increase in ventral CSF space immediately postoperatively was 1.68 ± 0.17 mm (p < 0.0001), which increased to 2.75 ± 0.23 mm (p < 0.0001) at the most recent follow-up (p < 0.0001). The median (range) length of stay was 5 (2-33) days. The median time to extubation was 0 (0-3) days. The median time to oral feeding (defined as, at minimum, toleration of a clear liquid diet) was 1 (0-3) day. Symptoms improved in 97.6% of patients. Complications were rare and mostly associated with the cervical fusion portion of the combined surgical procedures. CONCLUSIONS: EEO is safe and effective for achieving anterior CMJ decompression and is often accompanied by posterior cervical stabilization. Ventral decompression improves over time. EEO should be considered for patients with appropriate indications.

Biomechanical comparison of anterior axis-atlanto-occipital transarticular fixation and anterior atlantoaxial transarticular fixation after odontoidectomy: A finite element analysis.

Background: Anterior axis-atlanto-occipital transarticular fixation (AAOF) and anterior atlanto-axial transarticular fixation (AAF) are two common anterior screw fixation techniques after odontoidectomy, but the biomechanical discrepancies between them remain unknown. Objectives: To investigate the biomechanical properties of craniovertebral junction (CVJ) after odontoidectomy, with AAOF or AAF. Methods: A validated finite element model of the intact occipital-cervical spine (from occiput to T1) was modified to investigate biomechanical changes, resulting from odontoidectomy, odontoidectomy with AAOF, and odontoidectomy with AAF. Results: After odontoidectomy, the range of motion (ROM) at C1-C2 increased in all loading directions, and the ROM at the Occiput-C1 elevated by 66.2%, 57.5%, and 41.7% in extension, lateral bending, and torsion, respectively. For fixation models, the ROM at the C1-C2 junction was observably reduced after odontoidectomy with AAOF and odontoidectomy with AAF. In addition, at the Occiput-C1, the ROM of odontoidectomy with AAOF model was notably lower than the normal model in extension (94.9%), flexion (97.6%), lateral bending (91.8%), and torsion (96.4%). But compared with the normal model, in the odontoidectomy with AAF model, the ROM of the Occiput-C1 increased by 52.2%, -0.1%, 92.1%, and 34.2% in extension, lateral bending, and torsion, respectively. Moreover, there were no distinctive differences in the stress at the screw-bone interface or the C2-C3 intervertebral disc between the two fixation systems. Conclusion: AAOF can maintain CVJ stability at the Occiput-C1 after odontoidectomy, but AAF cannot. Thus, for patients with pre-existing atlanto-occipital joint instability, AAOF is more suitable than AAF in the choice of anterior fixation techniques.

Anterior occipital condyle screw placement through the endonasal corridor: proof of concept study with cadaveric analysis.

PURPOSE: Odontoidectomy for ventral compressive pathology may result in O-C1 and/or C1-2 instability. Same-stage endonasal C1-2 spinal fusion has been advocated to eliminate risks associated with separate-stage posterior approaches. While endonasal methods for C1 instrumentation and C1-2 trans-articular stabilization exist, no hypothetical construct for endonasal occipital instrumentation has been validated. We provide an anatomic description of anterior occipital condyle (AOC) screw endonasal placement as proof-of-concept for endonasal craniocervical stabilization. METHODS: Eight adult, injected cadaveric heads were studied for placing 16 AOC screws endonasally. Thin-cut CT was used for registration. After turning a standard inferior U-shaped nasopharyngeal flap endonasally, 4 mm × 22 mm AOC screws were placed with a 0° driver using neuronavigation. Post-placement CT scans were obtained to determine: site-of-entry, measured from the endonasal projection of the medial O-C1 joint; screw angulation in sagittal and axial planes, proximity to critical structures. RESULTS: Average site-of-entry was 6.88 mm lateral and 9.74 mm rostral to the medial O-C1 joint. Average angulation in the sagittal plane was 0.16° inferior to the palatal line. Average angulation in the axial plane was 23.97° lateral to midline. Average minimum screw distances from the jugular bulb and hypoglossal canal were 4.80 mm and 1.55 mm. CONCLUSION: Endonasal placement of AOC screws is feasible using a 0° driver. Our measurements provide useful parameters to guide optimal placement. Given proximity of hypoglossal canal and jugular bulb, neuronavigation is recommended. Biomechanical studies will ultimately be necessary to evaluate the strength of AOC screws with plate-screw constructs utilizing endonasal C1 lateral mass or C1-2 trans-articular screws as inferior fixation points.

Transcervical, retropharyngeal odontoidectomy - Anatomical considerations.

Context: Anterior craniocervical junction lesions have always been a challenge for neurosurgeons. Presenting with lower cranial nerve dysfunction and symptoms of brainstem compression, decompression is often required. While posterior approaches offer indirect ventral brainstem decompression, direct decompression via odontoidectomy is necessary when they fail. The transoral and endoscopic endonasal approaches have been explored but come with their own limitations and risks. A novel retropharyngeal approach to the cervical spine has shown promising results with reduced complications. Aims: This study aims to explore the feasibility and potential advantages of the anterior retropharyngeal approach for accessing the odontoid process. Methods and Surgical Technique: To investigate the anatomical aspects of the anterior retropharyngeal approach, a paramedian skin incision was performed below the submandibular gland on two cadaveric specimens. The subcutaneous tissue followed by the platysma is dissected, and the superficial fascial layer is opened. The plane between the vascular sheath laterally and the pharyngeal structures medially is entered below the branching point of the facial vein and internal jugular vein. After reaching the prevertebral plane, further dissection cranially is done in a blunt fashion below the superior pharyngeal nerve and artery. Various anatomical aspects were highlighted during this approach. Results: The anterior, submandibular retropharyngeal approach to the cervical spine was performed successfully on two cadavers highlighting relevant anatomical structures, including the carotid artery and the glossopharyngeal, hypoglossal, and vagus nerves. This approach offered wide exposure, avoidance of oropharyngeal contamination, and potential benefit in repairing cerebrospinal fluid fistulas. Conclusions: For accessing the craniocervical junction, the anterior retropharyngeal approach is a viable technique that offers many advantages. However, when employing this approach, surgeons must have adequate anatomical knowledge and technical proficiency to ensure better outcomes. Further studies are needed to enhance our anatomical variations understanding and reduce intraoperative risks.

Traumatic posterior atlantoaxial dislocation without fracture of the odontoid process: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic posterior atlantoaxial dislocation without fracture of the odontoid process is extremely rare. Only 24 cases have been documented since the first patient was reported by Haralson and Boyd in 1969. Although various treatment strategies are reported, no consensus has been yielded. OBSERVATIONS: A 58-year-old man experienced loss of consciousness and breathing difficulties after being struck by a car from behind. An immediate computed tomography scan showed subarachnoid hemorrhage, a posterior atlantoaxial dislocation without C1-2 fracture, and a right tibiofibular fracture. After the patient's respiration and hemodynamics were stabilized, closed reduction was attempted. However, this strategy failed due to unbearable neck pain and quadriplegia, resulting in surgical intervention with transoral odontoidectomy and posterior occipitocervical fusion. The patient developed postoperative central nervous system infection. After anti-infective and drainage treatment, the infection was controlled. At 1-year follow-up, the patient did not complain of special discomfort and was generally in good condition. LESSONS: The authors report their experience with transoral odontoidectomy and concomitant posterior occipitocervical fusion in a case of posterior atlantoaxial dislocation without related fracture. Although these procedures are highly feasible and effective, particular attention should be paid to their complications, such as postoperative infection.

Surgical Management Of Irreducible Atlanto-Axial Dislocation With OS Odontoideum And Klippel-Feil Syndrome.

Klippel-Feil syndrome (KFS) is the congenital fusion of two or more cervical vertebrae which is often associated with various other abnormalities in the cervical spine. Involvement the upper cervical segments leads to atlanto-axial instability which manifests as progressive neurological symptoms due to compression on the spinal cord. These cases pose a surgical challenge due the abnormal and unique anatomy of each patient. A 37-year-old patient presented with neck pain and cervical myelopathy due to a posterior subluxation of C2-3 fused segment over C4-6 fused segment. The patient had an os odontoideum, incomplete posterior arch of C1, anomalous course of vertebral artery and C3 hemi-vertebra. The patient was successfully managed with transoral odontoidectomy and occipeto-cervical fusion. Irreducible atlanto-axial dislocation in a patient with an abnormal upper cervical spine anatomy may require transoral decompression followed by posterior fusion.

The Impact of C1 Anterior Arch Preservation on Spine Stability After Odontoidectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Odontoidectomy for symptomatic irreducible ventral brainstem compression at the craniovertebral junction may result in spine instability requiring subsequent instrumentation. There is no consensus on the importance of C1 anterior arch preservation in prevention of iatrogenic instability. We conducted a systematic review of the impact of C1 anterior arch preservation on postodontoidectomy spine stability. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched following the PRISMA guidelines to include studies of patients undergoing odontoidectomy. Random-effect model meta-analyses were performed to compare spine stability between C1 anterior arch preservation versus removal and posttreatment outcomes between transoral approaches (TOAs) versus endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs). RESULTS: We included 27 studies comprising 462 patients. The most common lesions were basilar invagination (73.3%) and degenerative arthritis (12.6%). Symptoms included myelopathy (72%) and neck pain (43.9%). Odontoidectomy was performed through TOA (56.1%) and EEA corridors (34.4%). The C1 anterior arch was preserved in 16.7% of cases. Postodontoidectomy stabilization was performed in 83.3% patients. Median follow-up was 27 months (range, 0.1-145). Rates of spine instability were significantly lower (P = 0.004) when the C1 anterior arch was preserved. Postoperative clinical improvement and pooled complications were reported in 78.8% and 12.6% of patients, respectively, with no significant differences between TOA and EEA (P = 0.892; P = 0.346). Patients undergoing EEA had significantly higher rates of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Odontoidectomy is safe and effective for treating craniovertebral junction lesions. Preservation of the C1 anterior arch seems to improve maintenance of spine stability. TOA and EEA show comparable outcomes and complication rates.

C1 Lateral Mass Screw Placement Through Endonasal Corridor for Purpose of O-C1 Fusion: Morphometric Analysis in Cadaveric Specimens.

BACKGROUND: Odontoidectomy may pose some risks for O-C1 and/or C1-C2 instability, with previous authors reporting techniques for endonasal C1-C2 fusion. However, no technique for endonasal O-C1 fusion currently exists. We sought to describe the feasibility of endonasal anterior C1 (AC1) screw placement for endonasal O-C1 fusion. METHODS: Seven adult cadaveric heads were studied for endonasal placement of 14 C1 screws. Using thin-cut computed tomography (CT)-based "snapshot" neuronavigation assistance, 4 mm x 22 mm screws were placed in the C1 lateral mass using a 0° driver. Post-placement CT scans were obtained to determine site-of-entry measured from C1 anterior tubercle, screw angulation in axial and sagittal planes, and screw proximity to the central canal and foramen transversarium. RESULTS: Average site-of-entry was 16.57 mm lateral, 2.23 mm rostral, and 5.53 mm deep to the anterior-most portion of the C1 ring. Average axial angulation was 19.49° lateral to midline, measured at the C1 level. Average sagittal angulation was 13.22° inferior to the palatal line, measured from the hard palate to the opisthion. Bicortical purchase was achieved in 11 screws (78.6%). Partial breach of the foramen transversarium was observed in 2 screws (14.3%), violation of the O-C1 joint space in 1 (7.1%), and violation of the central canal in 0 (0%). Average minimum screw distances from the unviolated foramen transversaria and central canal were 1.97 mm and 4.04 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Navigation-assisted endonasal placement of AC1 screws is feasible. Additional studies should investigate the biomechanical stability of anterior C1 screw-plating systems, with anterior condylar screws as superior fixation point, compared to traditional posterior O-C1 fusion.