The association between continuous polypharmacy and hospitalization, emergency department visits, and death in older adults: a nationwide large cohort study.

Background: This study aimed to investigate the association between continuous polypharmacy and hospitalization, emergency department (ED) visits, and death. Methods: This retrospective study utilized 6,443,896 patients aged between 65 and 84 years of National Health Insurance claims data from 2016 to 2018. Polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy were defined as the concurrent use of 5 or more and 10 or more medications, respectively, for durations of both 90 days or more and 180 days or more within a 1-year observation period. The primary outcome measures included all-cause hospitalization, ED visits, and mortality. Multiple logistic regression models were used adjusting for patients' general characteristics, comorbidities, and history of hospitalization or ED visits. Results: Among 2,693,897 patients aged 65-84 years who had used medicines for 180 days or more (2,955,755 patients taking medicines for 90 days or more), the adverse outcomes were as follows: 20.5% (20.3%) experienced hospitalization, 10.9% (10.8%) visited the ED, and 1% (1%) died, respectively. In patients who exhibited polypharmacy for more than 180 days, the adjusted odds ratio of adverse outcomes was 1.32 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-1.33) for hospitalization, 1.32 (95% CI, 1.31-1.33) for ED visits, 1.63 (95% CI, 1.59-1.67) for death, and that in excessive polypharmacy patients for more than 180 days was 1.85 for hospitalization, 1.92 for ED visits, and 2.57 for death, compared to non-polypharmacy patients. Conclusion: Our results suggest that polypharmacy in older adults might lead to negative health consequences. Thus, interventions to optimize polypharmacy may need to be implemented.

Are primary care physicians familiar enough with potentially inappropriate medications in geriatric care? A cross-sectional study in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and polypharmacy constitute increasing healthcare costs and significant risk for adverse outcomes in older adults. The American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria form a screening tool for the identification of PIMs and guidance for healthcare providers in prescribing appropriate medications. However, primary care physicians' knowledge of screening tools, of Beers Criteria, in particular, is not known. Therefore, this study was to investigate primary care physicians in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia and their awareness of Beers Criteria and knowledge of PIMs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted among primary care physicians working in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Data were collected using an online self-administered questionnaire that consisted of sections on the general characteristics of respondents and their knowledge of Beers Criteria as a screening tool. Eight clinical-based vignettes concerning different therapeutic areas of medication use in the elderly were included, with a score of 1 and 0 for correct and wrong answers, respectively. Data presented as frequency and percentage. Chi-square test was used to determine the association between duration of practice and the level of awareness about Beers criteria. RESULTS: Of the 121 physicians who returned completed questionnaires, 41.3% of respondents knew about Beers Criteria. Most respondents (52.9%) were confident in prescribing appropriately for elderly patients. The association between the duration of practice and confidence level was statistically significant (P = 0.040). Respondents showed an above-average knowledge of the clinical vignettes with a correct answer rate >50% in all clinical scenarios. Online search (84.2%) and physician colleagues' knowledge and experiences (39.2%) were the primary source of information reported by the respondents. CONCLUSION: Awareness of Beers Criteria of primary care physicians in Saudi Arabia's Eastern Province is low. Therefore, our results will educate healthcare workers on the importance of Beers Criteria in Geriatric patients' prescriptions, in order to significantly improve the well-being of the elderly.

[Dose adjustment according to renal function in a polymedicated patient included in the medication reconditioning service using medication compliance aids (MCA)]. / Ajuste de dosis según función renal en una paciente polimedicada incluida en el servicio de reacondicionamiento de medicamentos utilizando sistemas personalizados de dosificación (SPD).

78-year-old patient, polymedicated and enrolled in the medication compliance aids service. When she went to pick up her medication, she informed us that for a few months she has been suffering from fatigue, weakness, dizziness and confusion. A medication review is performed, focused on the dosage of renal metabolism or elimination medications, based on the patient's estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR). A referral was made to the Primary Care Physician (PCP) through a report, in which the dose reduction of losartan and manidipine was recommended according to the patient's eGFR. The PCP reduced the dose of antihypertensives. A follow-up of the case was carried out, which allowed to observe that the patient stopped presenting the symptoms initially described.

[The review of the treatment of a very complex patient easily finds areas for improvement. Case report]. / La revisión del tratamiento de un paciente muy complejo fácilmente encuentra aspectos mejorables. A propósito de un caso.

Case presentation: A 100-year-old male presented with an episode of profound bradycardia. The patient's carer alerted the emergency department and they withdrew the bisoprolol and controlled the bradycardia. Once the problem was resolved, we were asked if any of his medications could be related to the bradycardia. Assessment and evaluation: On reviewing all the patient's treatment, which is very complex, we cannot establish a clear relationship between any of his 19 drugs and the bradycardia, except for the bisoprolol already withdrawn, but we found 6 other problems that we tried to solve. Results: Of the 6 proposed changes, 3 are accepted. Final comment: The review of a complex treatment will probably allow us to detect some aspects that could be improved.

Stakeholders' perspectives about challenges, strategies and outcomes of importance associated with adherence to appropriate polypharmacy in older patients - A qualitative study.

Background: Older patients experience challenges when taking polypharmacy. Studies have applied different interventions to improve adherence to polypharmacy. However, inconsistencies in outcomes have impeded the synthesis of evidence. To generate high-quality studies and selectively report outcomes, a Core Outcome Set (COS) is advocated. Objectives: This study explored stakeholders' perspectives about the challenges older patients face when taking polypharmacy, strategies to overcome each challenge, and outcomes of importance that may contribute to COS development. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with academics, healthcare professionals, and public participants. A series of open-ended questions investigated challenges with adherence to polypharmacy in older patients and strategies to overcome these challenges. A list of outcomes (n = 7) compiled from previous studies associated with adherence to polypharmacy was presented to participants for their views. Content analysis was conducted to identify key themes and outcomes proposed by participants. Results: Participants suggested 11 multidimensional healthcare system-related, medication-related, patient-related, and socioeconomic-related challenges and 16 educational and behavioural strategies associated with adherence to polypharmacy in older patients. Participants agreed with the importance of the seven outcomes presented and suggested a further six outcomes they deemed to be important for use in trials aimed at improving adherence to appropriate polypharmacy in older patients. Conclusions: Adherence to polypharmacy was deemed challenging, requiring supportive interventions. A list of 13 outcomes in the context of adherence to appropriate polypharmacy in older patients was identified to inform a future study that will develop a COS for clinical trials targeting interventions to improve adherence to appropriate polypharmacy in older patients.

Trends in polypharmacy among U.S. adults with asthma, 2001-2020.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate trends in polypharmacy prevalence among adults with asthma in the United States. METHODS: Data from the 2001-2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were used to estimate the weighted prevalence of polypharmacy. Joinpoint regression analysis was conducted to evaluate trends in polypharmacy. Trends were first evaluated overall and then stratified by asthma severity and asthma control. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with polypharmacy. RESULTS: From 2001 to 2020, a stable trend in polypharmacy among U.S. adults with asthma was observed (average annual percent change [AAPC]=1.02, p=0.71). Trends across different asthma severity were stable (mild asthma: AAPC=2.93, p=0.20; moderate asthma: AAPC=-2.22, p=0.35; severe asthma: AAPC=0.45, p=0.82). Trends in adults with good asthma control and those with poor control stayed constant (good control: AAPC=0.82, p=0.68; poor control: AAPC=-1.22, p=0.82). Several factors, including older age, females, Non-Hispanic Black, health insurance coverage, family income, number of healthcare visits, former smokers, multi-morbidities, asthma severity, and asthma control, were associated with polypharmacy. CONCLUSIONS: Polypharmacy prevalence has remained constant among U.S. adults with asthma over the past two decades. Despite a stable overall trend, disparities in polypharmacy prevalence persist across different asthma severity and control status, underscoring the need for tailored medication management to improve asthma care.

Somatization in Polypharmacy: Hiding in Plain Sight.

Polypharmacy and somatic symptom disorder (SSD) are common conditions clinicians see every day in practice. Polypharmacy is easy to identify and causation seems to be straightforward. However, SSD may not be so obvious and may be an underlying cause of the polypharmacy that may be more difficult to identify. Identifying SSD as a potential psychiatric cause for polypharmacy and understanding that adding more medications will not adequately resolve the patient's symptoms is important to prevent polypharmacy from being exacerbated.

Medication burden reduction and early clinical benefit through aripiprazole once monthly in schizophrenia patients with polypharmacy.

Antipsychotic polypharmacy is commonly used in clinical settings, with a growing trend in using long-acting injections to mitigate many side effects of polypharmacy. A previous study demonstrated that long-acting aripiprazole once-monthly (AOM) injection increased treatment adherence, restored functionality, and improved symptoms. However, there is insufficient evidence to demonstrate the therapeutic effects of AOM in polypharmacy practice. This observational study aimed to investigate the real-world clinical benefits and effectiveness of AOM by assessing changes in drug dosage, the number of drugs, clinical functioning, psychotic symptoms, and the duration of drug efficacy. Study participants were recruited from eight study sites, with the baseline visit marking the initiation of drug treatment. Clinical and demographic data were collected from medical records at screening, baseline, and months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12. Over 12 months, we analyzed changes in drug dosage, the number of drugs, and scores of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale-6 (PANSS-6), Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGIS). Data from 139 participants were analyzed. Total 12-month antipsychotic doses calculated in chlorpromazine equivalents (CPE) were reduced by 32.6%. A comparison of total monthly antipsychotic doses in CPE between the first and last months showed a 24.6% reduction in the dose. Additionally, the quantity of benzodiazepine tablets/capsules, total benzodiazepine doses calculated in lorazepam equivalents, and quantity of tablets/capsules of mood stabilizers, anticholinergics, and beta blockers were significantly reduced. GAF scores increased by 14.1% over 12 months, and PANSS-6 total scores reduced by 17.3% over 12 months, with significant differences observed from month 1 and baseline, respectively. The scores steadily improved until month 9 compared to those of the previous months, continuing to improve through month 12. The CGI-S score reduced by 14.3% over 12 months, showing a significant decrease from month 1 and a steady improvement until month 6, maintaining this improvement until month 12. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the early effectiveness of AOM in treating Korean patients with schizophrenia on polypharmacy. AOM improved function and clinical symptoms in patients with schizophrenia from treatment onset and caused a decrease in the quantity and dosage of drugs taken by the patients.

Prevalence of Polypharmacy in Elderly Population Worldwide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy (PP) is common in elderly population and associated with some adverse clinical outcomes and increases healthcare burdens. We performed this systemic review and meta-analysis to estimate worldwide prevalence of PP and explore associated factors in the elderly. METHODS: The PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Ovid EMBASE databases were searched for studies published until May 30, 2022. We included observational studies representative of general patients aged ≥60 in which PP was defined as multiple drugs ≥5. Studies were excluded if only a particular group of the elderly population (e.g., with diabetes) were included. The primary outcome was the prevalence of PP. Random-effect models were employed to estimate the overall or variable-specific pooled estimates of PP. Secondary outcomes were hyperpolypharmacy (HPP, defined as multiple drugs ≥10) and PP prevalence based on different study years, genders, locations, populations, and so forth. RESULTS: We included 122 original observational studies with an overall population of 57 328 043 individuals in the meta-analysis. The overall prevalence of PP and HPP in the elderly population worldwide was 39.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 35.5%-42.7%) and 13.3% (95% CI, 10.4%-16.5%), respectively. The prevalence of PP in Europe, Oceania, North America, Asia, and South America was 45.8% (95% CI, 41.5%-50.2%), 45.5% (95% CI, 26.7%-64.3%), 40.8% (95% CI, 29.8%-51.6%), 29.0% (95% CI, 20.0%-38.0%), and 28.4% (95% CI, 24.0%-32.8%), respectively (p < 0.01). Multivariate meta-regressions showed geographical regions of Europe or North America, age ≥70, and residence from nursing homes were independently associated with higher PP prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 40% of the elderly population is exposed to PP. The prevalence of PP is significantly higher in elderly individuals aged 70 or older, in developed regions and in nursing homes. It is important to focus on avoiding inappropriate PP in this population to address the growing burden of PP.

The association between medication use and health-related quality of life in multimorbid older patients with polypharmacy.

PURPOSE: To explore the association between medication use-related factors and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in older hospitalised multimorbid patients with polypharmacy. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used the intervention arm data of the OPERAM trial (hospitalised patients ≥ 70 years with polypharmacy). HRQoL was assessed using the visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) and the EQ-5D index score of the EuroQol questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). Lower or higher EQ-VAS/EQ-5D was based on the median of the study population. Medication use-related factors included hyperpolypharmacy (≥ 10 medications), anticholinergic and sedative burden, appropriateness of medication (STOPP/START criteria), high-risk medication for hospital (re)admission, medication complexity and adherence. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between medication use-related factors and HRQoL. RESULTS: A total of 955 patients were included (mean age 79 years, 46% female, median EQ-VAS of 60, median EQ-5D of 0.60). Opioids use was associated with lower EQ-5D and EQ-VAS (aOR EQ-5D: 2.10; 95% CI 1.34-3.32, EQ-VAS: 1.59; 1.11-2.30). Hyperpolypharmacy (aOR 1.37; 1.05-1.80), antibiotics (aOR 1.64; 1.01-2.68) and high medication complexity (aOR 1.53; 1.10-2.15) were associated with lower EQ-VAS. A high anticholinergic and sedative burden (aOR 1.73; 1.11-2.69), presence of multiple prescribing omissions (aOR 1.94; 1.19-3.17) and benzodiazepine use (aOR 2.01; 1.22-3.35) were associated with lower EQ-5D. Especially in hyperpolypharmacy patients, high anticholinergic and sedative burden and medication complexity were associated with a lower HRQoL. CONCLUSION: Several medication use-related factors are significantly associated with a lower HRQoL in hospitalised older patients. Medication complexity is a novel factor, which should be considered when evaluating medication use of older patients with hyperpolypharmacy.

Impact of hospitalizations on problematic medication use among community dwelling persons with dementia.

BACKGROUND: Hospitalizations are frequently disruptive for persons with dementia (PWD) in part due to the use of potentially problematic medications for complications such as delirium, pain, and insomnia. We sought to determine the impact of hospitalizations on problematic medication prescribing in the months following hospitalization. METHODS: We included community-dwelling PWD in the Health and Retirement Study aged ≥66 with a hospitalization from 2008-2018. We characterized problematic medications as medications that negatively affect cognition (strongly anticholinergics/sedative-hypnotics), medications from 2019 Beers criteria, and medications from STOPP-V2. To capture durable changes, we compared problematic medications 4 weeks pre-hospitalization (baseline) to 4 months post-hospitalization period. We used a generalized linear mixed model with Poisson distribution adjusting for age, sex, comorbidity count, pre-hospital chronic medications, and timepoint. RESULTS: Among 1,475 PWD, 504 had a qualifying hospitalization (median age 84 (IQR=79-90), 66% female, 17% Black). There was a small increase in problematic medications from the baseline to post-hospitalization timepoint that did not reach statistical significance (adjusted mean 1.28 vs. 1.40, difference 0.12 (95% CI -0.03, 0.26), p=0.12). Results were consistent across medication domains and certain subgroups. In one pre-specified subgroup, individuals on <5 pre-hospital chronic medications showed a greater increase in post-hospital problematic medications compared to those on ≥5 medications (p=0.04 for interaction, mean increase from baseline to post-hospitalization of 0.25 for those with <5 medications (95% CI 0.05, 0.44) vs. 0.06 (95% CI -0.12, 0.25) for those with ≥5 medications). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalizations had a small, non-statistically significant effect on longer-term problematic medication use among PWD.

Management of older adults with diabetes mellitus: Perspective from geriatric medicine.

Advances in diabetes medication and population aging are lengthening the lifespans of people with diabetes mellitus (DM). Older patients with diabetes mellitus often have multimorbidity and tend to have polypharmacy. In addition, diabetes mellitus is associated with frailty, functional decline, cognitive impairment, and geriatric syndrome. Although the numbers of patients with frailty, dementia, disability, and/or multimorbidity are increasing worldwide, the accumulated evidence on the safe and effective treatment of these populations remains insufficient. Older patients, especially those older than 75 years old, are often underrepresented in randomized controlled trials of various treatment effects, resulting in limited clinical evidence for this population. Therefore, a deeper understanding of the characteristics of older patients is essential to tailor management strategies to their needs. The clinical guidelines of several academic societies have begun to recognize the importance of relaxing glycemic control targets to prevent severe hypoglycemia and to maintain quality of life. However, glycemic control levels are thus far based on expert consensus rather than on robust clinical evidence. There is an urgent need for the personalized management of older adults with diabetes mellitus that considers their multimorbidity and function and strives to maintain a high quality of life through safe and effective medical treatment. Older adults with diabetes mellitus accompanied by frailty, functional decline, cognitive impairment, and multimorbidity require special management considerations and liaison with both carers and social resources.

'It's a job to be done'. Managing polypharmacy at home: A qualitative interview study exploring the experiences of older people living with frailty.

INTRODUCTION: Many older people live with both multiple long-term conditions and frailty; thus, they manage complex medicines regimens and are at heightened risk of the consequences of medicines errors. Research to enhance how people manage medicines has focused on adherence to regimens rather than on the wider skills necessary to safely manage medicines, and the older population living with frailty and managing multiple medicines at home has been under-explored. This study, therefore, examines in depth how older people with mild to moderate frailty manage their polypharmacy regimens at home. METHODS: Between June 2021 and February 2022, 32 patients aged 65 years or older with mild or moderate frailty and taking five or more medicines were recruited from 10 medical practices in the North of England, United Kingdom, and the CARE 75+ research cohort. Semi-structured interviews were conducted face to face, by telephone or online. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. FINDINGS: Five themes were developed: (1) Managing many medicines is a skilled job I didn't apply for; (2) Medicines keep me going, but what happened to my life?; (3) Managing medicines in an unclear system; (4) Support with medicines that makes my work easier; and (5) My medicines are familiar to me-there is nothing else I need (or want) to know. While navigating fragmented care, patients were expected to fit new medicines routines into their lives and keep on top of their medicines supply. Sometimes, they felt let down by a system that created new obstacles instead of supporting their complex daily work. CONCLUSION: Frail older patients, who are at heightened risk of the impact of medicines errors, are expected to perform complex work to safely self-manage multiple medicines at home. Such a workload needs to be acknowledged, and more needs to be done to prepare people in order to avoid harm from medicines. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: An older person managing multiple medicines at home was a core member of the research team. An advisory group of older patients and family members advised the study and was involved in the first stages of data analysis. This influenced how data were coded and themes shaped.

Factors associated with hypnotics polypharmacy in the Japanese population.

OBJECTIVE: Insomnia disorder is a global public health issue, commonly treated with hypnotics. However, long-term use of benzodiazepine derivatives (BZDs), especially polypharmacy with this kind of drug, carries risks for dependence and abuse. This study using large-scale medical insurance records investigated the causes of polypharmacy through the treatment of insomnia disorder. METHODS: A cross-sectional study analyzed anonymized medical record data from July 2014 to March 2018 provided by a nationwide Japanese health insurance association covering 405,952 individuals. Outpatients prescribed at least one sleep medication were included. Demographic data, pharmacological classification of the drugs, and comorbidities were assessed using hierarchical logistic regression analysis to explore their associations with polypharmacy. RESULTS: Of the 33,212 outpatients who were prescribed sleep medications, 32.5 % were prescribed multiple types. After adjusting for demographics and type of sleep medications as covariates, hypnotic polypharmacy was significantly associated with younger age, the presence of certain kinds of comorbidities, and using BZD anxiolytics before bedtime with the highest adjusted odds ratios (8.01-9.39) when referenced with BZD hypnotics. On the other hand, usage of orexin receptor antagonists, melatonin receptor agonists, and Z-drugs indicated lower odds ratios (0.74-0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Hypnotic polypharmacy is relatively common in the Japanese general population. With the introduction of non-pharmacological therapy in mind, assessing patients' comorbidities and avoiding the use of benzodiazepines, especially BZD anxiolytics, before bedtime would be recommended to prevent polypharmacy.

Efficacy and tolerability of antipsychotic polypharmacy for schizophrenia spectrum disorders. A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.

BACKGROUND: Antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP) is frequently prescribed for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Despite the inconsistent findings on efficacy, APP may be beneficial for subgroups of psychotic patients. This meta-analysis of individual patient data investigated moderators of efficacy and tolerability of APP in adult patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. DESIGN: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Randomized Trials until September 1, 2022, for randomized controlled trials comparing APP with antipsychotic monotherapy. We estimated the effects with a one-stage approach for patient-level moderators and a two-stage approach for study-level moderators, using (generalized) linear mixed-effects models. Primary outcome was treatment response, defined as a reduction of 25 % or more in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score. Secondary outcomes were study discontinuation, and changes from baseline on the PANSS total score, its positive and negative symptom subscale scores, the Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI), and adverse effects. RESULTS: We obtained individual patient data from 10 studies (602 patients; 31 % of all possible patients) and included 599 patients in our analysis. A higher baseline PANSS total score increased the chance of a response to APP (OR = 1.41, 95 % CI 1.02; 1.94, p = 0.037 per 10-point increase in baseline PANSS total), mainly driven by baseline positive symptoms. The same applied to changes on the PANSS positive symptom subscale and the CGI severity scale. Extrapyramidal side effects increased significantly where first and second-generation antipsychotics were co-prescribed. Study discontinuation was comparable between both treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: APP was effective in severely psychotic patients with high baseline PANSS total scores and predominantly positive symptoms. This effect must be weighed against potential adverse effects.

Comparative analysis of prescription patterns and errors in government versus private hospitals in Dhaka: A cross-sectional study.

Background and Objectives: Prescription errors can inadvertently compromise the effectiveness and increase the risk of adverse events. This study aims to compare prescription patterns and errors between government and private hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh, by evaluating the World Health Organization (WHO) prescription indicators, polypharmacy, and omission errors. Methods: Between September 2021 and November 2021, a total of 399 prescriptions were collected from outpatient departments of various government and private hospitals from patients or their attendants. The data were analyzed using the statistical package STATA 15. Chi-square and Fisher's exact test were employed to determine associations (p < 0.05) among various types of categorical data. Results: Of the collected prescriptions, 48% (n = 192) were from government, while 52% (n = 207) were from private hospitals. The mean number of medicines per prescription was 5.16 for government and 5.87 for private hospitals. Generic names were absent (0%) in both types of hospitals. Antibiotics were present in 34.37% of prescriptions from government and 51.69% from private hospitals. Moreover, injection were found in 17.70% of government and 18.35% of private hospitals' prescriptions. Government hospitals adhered to 67.97% of the essential drug list, whereas private hospitals adhered to 80.42%. Associations between hospital types were observed in missing age, and comorbidities, while no association was found in inscription mistakes. Missing dates and signatures were also associated with hospital types. Polypharmacy was observed in 49.47% of government hospitals and 71.01% of private hospitals. Additionally, polypharmacy in females, pediatrics, geriatrics, and missing comorbidity were also associated with hospital types (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Both government and private hospitals exhibited similar deviations from the WHO prescribing indicators. While government hospitals showed more omission errors, private hospitals exhibited higher rates of polypharmacy. Physicians in both types of hospitals should be vigilant about omission errors, maintain the WHO prescribing indicators, and minimize polypharmacy.

Impact of a clinical decision support system on identifying drug-related problems and making recommendations to providers during community pharmacist-led medication reviews in Ontario, Canada: A pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a clinical decision support system (CDSS) to identify drug-related problems (DRPs) during community pharmacist medication reviews. DESIGN: Pilot 3-phase (group), open-label study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Two community pharmacies in Sarnia, Ontario, with pharmacists providing medication reviews to patients. STUDY PROCEDURES: Five pharmacists participated in three phases (groups). During Phase 1, pharmacists conducted medication reviews in 25 adult patients using the usual approaches. In Phase 2, pharmacists were trained to use a CDSS to identify DRPs, and then conducted medication reviews using the tool in a different group of 25 adult patients. In Phase 3, pharmacists conducted medication reviews without the aid of the CDSS in 25 additional adult patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was recommendation to the primary care physician to alter pharmacotherapy based on medication review, assessed using mean number and frequency (yes/no) of recommendations by patient. Secondary outcomes included number of potential DRPs, actual DRPs, medication review duration time, pharmacist's perceptions of the CDSS and patient satisfaction with medication review. RESULTS: The mean number of recommendations to primary care physicians to alter pharmacotherapy per patient in Phases 1, 2 and 3 did not differ: 1.0 (SD = I.2) versus 1.5 (1.0) versus 1.5 (1.0), respectively; p = 0.223. The percentage of patients with a pharmacy recommendation sent to physicians across the phases, however, differed: 52% versus 80% versus 88%, respectively; p = 0.010, with more in Phases 2 and 3 compared to 1. There were more potential DRPs in group 2 compared to other groups. There were no differences in actual DRPs and medication review time. Pharmacists had positive attitudes about the CDSS. Patients were generally satisfied with their medication review. CONCLUSIONS: This small pilot study provides some preliminary evidence for performance and feasibility of a CDSS to identify DRPs that pharmacists will act on. Future research is recommended to validate these findings in a larger sample.

Psychotropic Polypharmacy Combinations and Duration of Polypharmacy Among Medicaid-Enrolled Youths.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated psychotropic polypharmacy frequency and patterns of use among Medicaid-enrolled youths. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of a state Medicaid claims database (2015-2020) focused on youths (≤17 years old) with at least one psychotropic medication claim and ≥90 continuous days of Medicaid enrollment. Psychotropic polypharmacy (claims for three or more therapeutic classes of psychotropics for ≥90 consecutive days) was analyzed as average annual days and annual prevalence of class combinations. Multivariable negative binomial regression models assessed changes in annual psychotropic polypharmacy days. RESULTS: A total of 126,972 unique youths were identified. Almost all youths with psychotropic polypharmacy had three-class combinations, the most common of which included attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder medications, antipsychotics, and antidepressants. The number of polypharmacy days increased from a mean±SD of 227.8±90.3 in 2015 to 235.7±97.5 in 2020. Polypharmacy days significantly increased year over year (rate ratio=1.01, 95% CI=1.00-1.01). CONCLUSIONS: Psychotropic polypharmacy regimens reflect chronic use that is increasing over time.

Rate of Polypharmacy and Its Determinants Among Older Adult Cardiovascular Patients at Hiwot Fana Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in Eastern Ethiopia.

Background: Understanding the rate of polypharmacy in cardiovascular patients is crucial because of its increasing occurrence and its association with potentially inappropriate prescribing practices and negative health outcomes, particularly among elderly individuals with cardiovascular conditions. According to the best of the literature search knowledge, the magnitude of polypharmacy and associated factors were not known among older cardiovascular patients in eastern Ethiopia. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the rate of polypharmacy and its determinants among older adult cardiovascular patients at Hiwot Fana Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in eastern Ethiopia. Methods: A cross-sectional study design was undertaken, involving a cohort of 364 individuals aged 65 years and older who were receiving follow-up care for cardiovascular disease. A data abstraction sheet was used to gather the data. The convenience sampling technique was employed. To identify factors related to the rate of polypharmacy, multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed. Results: The analysis included the medical records of 325 patients, revealing a polypharmacy prevalence rate of 20.7%. Individuals who were 77 years of age or older had a 1.12 times higher likelihood of having polypharmacy than individuals who were 65 to 70 years old. The presence of comorbidities along with cardiovascular diseases was a significant factor related to polypharmacy. Polypharmacy was prevalent among individuals with a larger number of comorbidities. Conclusions: This study reported that 1 in 5 cardiovascular patients at a chronic care clinic experienced polypharmacy. Age (≥77 years), having comorbidities, number of comorbid diseases (≥3), duration of cardiovascular disease (≥5 years), and number of years taking cardiovascular drugs (≥5) were associated with higher odds of polypharmacy. Health care providers should be cautious about prescribing multiple medications to this population. Training in the prevention of inappropriate polypharmacy is crucial to reducing the trend of polypharmacy and its associated burden.