Organisms Causing Postoperative Implant Infection in Orthopedic Patients Presenting at a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Introduction Infections pose a significant challenge in orthopedics related to implant failure. In orthopedic surgeries, surgical site infections (SSIs) extend the patient's hospital stay by an average of two weeks and also increase morbidity, double hospitalization rates, and triple the financial burden on the patient. This study aims to determine the common organism in patients with postoperative implant infections presenting at a tertiary care hospital. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Orthopedic Surgery at JPMC Karachi over a six-month period, from November 24, 2022, to May 25, 2023. All patients of both genders aged 18-65 years presenting with postoperative implant infection within six hours of the development of symptoms were enrolled. Baseline demographic details and clinical histories were recorded at the time of presentation. A swab for culture and sensitivity was taken from the implant site using a sterile swab stick in patients with confirmed or suspected infections. Results Of 196 patients, the mean age of the patients was 48.47±5.19 years. Gender distribution showed that 49% of patients were females and 51% were males. The mean duration of surgery was 1.71±0.49 hours (100 minutes approximately); Klebsiella species 26% and Staphylococcus aureus 25.5% were the most common organisms isolated from infected surgical wounds, followed by Pseudomonas species in 32 patients (16.3%), Acinetobacter species in 27 patients (13.8%), Escherichia Coli in 23 patients (11.7%), and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus in 13 patients (6.6%). Conclusion In our cohort, Staphylococcus species and Klebsiella species were the most common pathogens isolated from postoperative implant infections. The rise in Klebsiella species suggests that changes in prophylactic antibiotic practices may have contributed to this trend. Therefore, there is an urgent need to reassess current prophylactic strategies in light of the increasing incidence of infections caused by gram-negative bacteria.

Perioperative antibiotic choice and postoperative infectious complications in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine how rates of postoperative infectious complications after pelvic organ prolapse surgery differ based on perioperative antibiotic administered. In particular, we sought to determine whether anaerobic coverage is associated with reduced rates of infectious complications. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Premier Healthcare U.S. national database, a comprehensive all-payer dataset capturing patients from urban and rural non-profit, community, and teaching hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients who underwent vaginal, laparoscopic, and/or abdominal prolapse surgery with or without hysterectomy from January 2000 to March 2020. Procedures with and without mesh were included. INTERVENTIONS: Rates of infectious complications were compared among patients who received guideline-concordant antibiotic regimens, including those with anaerobic coverage. The primary outcome was any surgical site infection within 30 days of surgery without mesh or 90 days of surgery involving mesh. RESULTS: Among 130,198 prolapse surgeries, the most common antibiotic regimens were cefazolin (n=97,058, 74.5%), second generation cephalosporin (n=16,442, 12.6%), clindamycin + aminoglycoside (n=8,397, 6.4%) and cefazolin + metronidazole (n=4,328, 3.3%). On multivariable logistic regression, only clindamycin + aminoglycoside was associated with a higher rate of surgical site infections (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.09-1.72) and other infectious morbidity (OR 1.26; 95% CI 1.12-1.42) when compared to cefazolin alone. The addition of metronidazole to cefazolin was not associated with reduced rates of surgical site infections (OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.82 - 1.45). Obesity (OR=1.22; 95% CI 1.03-1.43), diabetes without complication (OR=1.30; 95% CI 1.08-1.57), Charlson comorbidity score >0 (OR=1.24; 95% CI 1.06-1.45), and tobacco use (OR=1.22, 95% CI 1.05-1.40) were also associated with increased composite surgical site infection. CONCLUSION: Compared with cefazolin alone, the use of alternative perioperative antibiotics, including those with anaerobic coverage, was not associated with reduced infectious complications after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in this U.S. national sample.

UROPOT: study protocol for a randomized, double-blind phase I/II trial for metabolism-based potentiation of antimicrobial prophylaxis in the urological tract.

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract catheters, including Double-J or ureteral stents, are prone to bacterial colonization forming biofilms and leading to asymptomatic bacteriuria. In the context of asymptomatic bacteriuria, endourological procedures causing mucosa-inducing lesions can lead to severe infections. Antibiotic prophylaxis is warranted, yet its efficacy is limited by biofilm formation on stents. Biofilms promote antibiotic tolerance, the capacity of genetically susceptible bacteria to survive a normally lethal dose of antimicrobial therapy. The UROPOT study evaluates the effectiveness of a first-in-type metabolism-based aminoglycoside potentiation for (i) preventing infectious complications of asymptomatic bacteriuria during mucosa lesion-inducing endourological procedures and (ii) assessing its anti-tolerance efficacy. METHODS: The UROPOT trial is a phase I/II single-center (Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Switzerland) randomized double-blinded trial. Over 2 years, patients with asymptomatic Escherichia coli and/or Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteriuria, undergoing endourological procedures, will be randomly allocated to one of three treatment arms (1:1:1 randomization ratio, 30 patients per group) to evaluate the efficacy of mannitol-potentiated low-dose amikacin compared to established standard treatments (ceftriaxone or amikacin standard dose). Patients will be recruited at the CHUV Urology Outpatient Clinic. The primary outcome is the comparative incidence of postoperative urinary tract infections (assessed at 48 h) between the investigational amikacin/mannitol therapy and standard (ceftriaxone or amikacin) antibiotic prophylaxis, defined by specific systemic symptoms and/or positive blood and/or urine culture. Secondary outcomes include assessing microbiological eradication through anti-biofilm activity, sustained microbiological eradication, and mannitol and antibiotics pharmacokinetics in blood and urine. Safety outcomes will evaluate the incidence of adverse events following amikacin/mannitol therapy and postoperative surgical complications at postoperative day 14. DISCUSSION: UROPOT tests a novel antimicrobial strategy based on "metabolic potentiation" for prophylaxis enabling aminoglycoside dose reduction and targeting biofilm activity. The anti-biofilm effect may prove beneficial, particularly in patients who have a permanent stent in situ needing recurrent endourological manipulations strategies in preventing infections and achieving sustained microbiological eradication in pre-stented patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol is approved by the local ethics committee (CER-VD, 2023-01369, protocole 2.0) and the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products (Swissmedic, 701,676) and is registered on the NIH's ClinicalTrials.gov (trial registration number: NCT05761405). Registered on March 07, 2023.

Automated Identification of Postoperative Infections to Allow Prediction and Surveillance Based on Electronic Health Record Data: Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative infections remain a crucial challenge in health care, resulting in high morbidity, mortality, and costs. Accurate identification and labeling of patients with postoperative bacterial infections is crucial for developing prediction models, validating biomarkers, and implementing surveillance systems in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aimed to explore methods for identifying patients with postoperative infections using electronic health record (EHR) data to go beyond the reference standard of manual chart review. METHODS: We performed a systematic search strategy across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science (Core Collection), the Cochrane Library, and Emcare (Ovid), targeting studies addressing the prediction and fully automated surveillance (ie, without manual check) of diverse bacterial infections in the postoperative setting. For prediction modeling studies, we assessed the labeling methods used, categorizing them as either manual or automated. We evaluated the different types of EHR data needed for the surveillance and labeling of postoperative infections, as well as the performance of fully automated surveillance systems compared with manual chart review. RESULTS: We identified 75 different methods and definitions used to identify patients with postoperative infections in studies published between 2003 and 2023. Manual labeling was the predominant method in prediction modeling research, 65% (49/75) of the identified methods use structured data, and 45% (34/75) use free text and clinical notes as one of their data sources. Fully automated surveillance systems should be used with caution because the reported positive predictive values are between 0.31 and 0.76. CONCLUSIONS: There is currently no evidence to support fully automated labeling and identification of patients with infections based solely on structured EHR data. Future research should focus on defining uniform definitions, as well as prioritizing the development of more scalable, automated methods for infection detection using structured EHR data.

Perioperative Use of IgM-Enriched Immunoglobulins in Liver Transplantation Recipients at High Risk for Infections: A Preliminary Study.

Background: Infections frequently occur after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) and are associated with increased mortality. In 2018, we introduced perioperative administration of intravenous immunoglobulin enriched in IgM as an optional therapy in recipients at a high risk of infection. This preliminary study evaluated whether this preparation reduced infections in the early post-transplantation period. Methods: Adult patients with a high risk of postoperative infections who underwent OLT between January 2014 and December 2021 in our center were included in the study. The primary outcome was the occurrence of new postoperative bacterial and fungal infections within the first 30 days after OLT. Results: Ninety recipients at a high risk of postoperative infections who underwent OLT were included, of whom 51 (57%) received IgM preparation. Patients treated and not treated with IgM were similar in terms of demographics, model of end-stage liver disease score, and risk factors for postoperative infections. The occurrence of new infections was lower (absolute risk reduction (ARR) 21.2%; p = 0.038) in patients who received IgM than in those who did not. Multivariate analysis adjusted for confounders (OR 0.348; p = 0.033) and propensity score-based matching analysis (ARR 21.2%, p = 0.067) confirmed an association between IgM preparation and lower occurrence of postoperative infections. The 90-day mortality rate was lower (ARR 13.4%, p = 0.018) in patients who received IgM preparation. Conclusions: In OLT recipients at high risk for infections, perioperative administration of an IgM-enriched preparation seems to reduce the development of new infections within the first 30 days after OLT.

A network meta-analysis of the timing of wound dressing removal.

INTRODUCTION: Wounds are invariably dressed postoperatively but the evidence for the timing of dressing changes is limited. This meta-analysis evaluated whether the relative risk of wound infection varies depending on when dressings are changed. METHODS: A frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis was conducted on the results of a systematic review of the MEDLINE®, Ovid®, Scopus®, Web of Science™ and PubMed® databases and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials performed in May 2023. Evidence quality was graded using the Confidence In Network Meta-Analysis tool. RESULTS: A total of 4 studies were included with 878 patients. A significant increase in the relative risk of wound infection was found when dressings were left in situ for more than 4.5 days when compared with 48 hours (3.18, 95% confidence interval: 1.22-8.33). There were no significant differences in the relative risk of infection between the other groups. Model heterogeneity and inconsistency were insignificant (Cochran's Q: 0.44, p=0.51). The quality of the evidence was graded as generally very low and risk of bias evaluations showed it to be of high concern for bias. CONCLUSIONS: Late dressing changes significantly increase the risks of wound infection and changes at 48 hours minimise these risks. There was no advantage demonstrated for earlier dressing changes. Ensuring that dressings are changed appropriately can minimise patient harm and health service costs.

Surgical Site Infections in Colorectal Cancer Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Surgical Approach and Associated Risk Factors.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) represent a noteworthy contributor to both morbidity and mortality in the context of patients who undergo colorectal surgery. Several risk factors have been identified; however, their relative significance remains uncertain. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of observational studies from their inception up until 2023 that investigated risk factors for SSIs in colorectal surgery. A random-effects model was used to pool the data and calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each risk factor. RESULTS: Our analysis included 26 studies with a total of 61,426 patients. The pooled results showed that male sex (OR = 1.45), body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2 (OR = 1.09), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥ 3 (OR = 1.69), were all independent risk factors for SSIs in colorectal surgery. Conversely, laparoscopic surgery (OR = 0.70) was found to be a protective factor. CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis conducted revealed various risk factors, both modifiable and non-modifiable, associated with surgical site infections (SSIs) in colorectal surgery. These findings emphasize the significance of targeted interventions, including optimizing glycemic control, minimizing blood loss, and using laparoscopic techniques whenever feasible in order to decrease the occurrence of surgical site infections in this particular group of patients.

Modern Microbiological Methods to Detect Biofilm Formation in Orthopedy and Suggestions for Antibiotic Therapy, with Particular Emphasis on Prosthetic Joint Infection (PJI).

Biofilm formation is a serious problem that relatively often causes complications in orthopedic surgery. Biofilm-forming pathogens invade implanted foreign bodies and surrounding tissues. Such a condition, if not limited at the appropriate time, often requires reoperation. This can be partially prevented by selecting an appropriate prosthesis material that prevents the development of biofilm. There are many modern techniques available to detect the formed biofilm. By applying them we can identify and visualize biofilm-forming microorganisms. The most common etiological factors associated with biofilms in orthopedics are: Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS), and Enterococcus spp., whereas Gram-negative bacilli and Candida spp. also deserve attention. It seems crucial, for therapeutic success, to eradicate the microorganisms able to form biofilm after the implantation of endoprostheses. Planning the effective targeted antimicrobial treatment of postoperative infections requires accurate identification of the microorganism responsible for the complications of the procedure. The modern microbiological testing techniques described in this article show the diagnostic options that can be followed to enable the implementation of effective treatment.

Implementation of perioperative blood glucose monitoring and insulin infusion protocol can decrease postoperative infection rate in diabetic patients undergoing elective craniotomy: An observational study.

BACKGROUND: Severe perioperative hyperglycemia (SH) is a proven risk factor for postoperative complications after craniotomy. To reduce this risk, it has been proposed to implement the standardized clinical protocol for scheduled perioperative blood glucose concentration (BGC) monitoring. This would be followed by intravenous (IV) insulin infusion to keep BGC below 180 mg/dl in the perioperative period. The aim of this prospective observational study was to assess the impact of this type of protocol on the postoperative infection rate in patients undergoing elective craniotomy. METHODS: A total of 42 patients were prospectively enrolled in the study. Protocol included scheduled BGC monitoring in the perioperative period and rapid-acting insulin IV infusion when intraoperative SH was detected. The diagnosis of infection (wound, pulmonary, blood stream, urinary tract infection or central nervous system infection) was established according to CDC criteria within the first postoperative week. A previously enrolled group of patients with sporadic BGC monitoring and subcutaneous insulin injections for SH management was used as a control group. RESULTS: An infectious complication (i.e., pneumonia) was diagnosed only in one patient (2 %) in the prospective group. In comparison with the control group, a decrease in the risk of postoperative infection was statistically significant with OR = 0.08 [0.009 - 0.72] (p = 0.02). Implementation of the perioperative BGC monitoring and the correction protocol prevented both severe hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia with BGC < 70 mg/dl. CONCLUSION: Scheduled BGC monitoring and the use of low-dose insulin infusion protocol can decrease the postoperative infection rate in patients undergoing elective craniotomy. Future studies are needed to prove the causality of the implementation of such a protocol with an improved outcome.

Orthopedic postoperative infection profile and antibiotic sensitivity of 2038 patients across 24 countries - Call for region and institution specific surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Purpose: Improper utilization of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis frequently leads to increased risks of morbidity and mortality.This study aims to understand the common causative organism of postoperative orthopedic infection and document the surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol across various institutions in to order to strengthen surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis practice and provide higher-quality surgical care. Methods: This multicentric multinational retrospective study, includes 24 countries from five different regions (Asia Pacific, South Eastern Africa, Western Africa, Latin America, and Middle East). Patients who developed orthopedic surgical site infection between January 2021 and December 2022 were included. Demographic details, bacterial profile of surgical site infection, and antibiotic sensitivity pattern were documented. Results: 2038 patients from 24 countries were included. Among them 69.7 % were male patients and 64.1 % were between 20 and 60 years. 70.3 % patients underwent trauma surgery and instrumentation was used in 93.5 %. Ceftriaxone was the most common preferred in 53.4 %. Early SSI was seen in 55.2 % and deep SSI in 59.7 %. Western Africa (76 %) and Asia-Pacific (52.8 %) reported a higher number of gram-negative infections whereas gram-positive organisms were predominant in other regions. Most common gram positive organism was Staphylococcus aureus (35 %) and gram-negative was Klebsiella (17.2 %). Majority of the organisms showed variable sensitivity to broad-spectrum antibiotics. Conclusion: Our study strongly proves that every institution has to analyse their surgical site infection microbiological profile and antibiotic sensitivity of the organisms and plan their surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis accordingly. This will help to decrease the rate of surgical site infection, prevent the emergence of multidrug resistance and reduce the economic burden of treatment.

Systemic glucocorticoid exposure and postoperative infection risk in 143,782 appendectomy patients-a Danish longitudinal nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: Glucocorticoids are conventionally associated with increased postoperative infection risk. It is necessary to clarify if preoperative glucocorticoid exposure is associated with postoperative infection in appendectomy patients and if the association is different for open and laparoscopic appendectomies. METHODS: A Danish nationwide study of appendectomy patients between 1996 and 2018. Exposures were defined as high (≥ 5 mg) versus no/low (< 5 mg) glucocorticoid exposure in milligram prednisone-equivalents/day preoperatively. The main outcome was any postoperative infection. Then, 90-day cumulative incidences (absolute risk) and adjusted hazard ratios (relative risk) of the outcome were calculated for high versus no/low glucocorticoid exposure within all appendectomies and within open and laparoscopic subgroups. Propensity-score matching was used for sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Of 143,782 patients, median age was 29 years, 74,543 were female, and 7654 experienced at least one infection during the 90-day follow-up. The 90-day cumulative incidence for postoperative infection was 5.3% within the no/low glucocorticoid exposure group and 10.0% within the high glucocorticoid exposure group. Compared to no/low glucocorticoid exposure, adjusted hazard ratios for 90-day postoperative infection with high glucocorticoid exposure were 1.25 [95% CI 1.02-1.52; p = 0.03] for all appendectomies, 1.59 [1.16-2.18; p = 0.004] for laparoscopic appendectomies, and 1.09 [0.85-1.40; p = 0.52] for open appendectomies (pinteraction < 0.001). The results were robust to sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Preoperative high (≥ 5 mg/day) glucocorticoid exposure was associated with increased absolute risk of postoperative infections in open and laparoscopic appendectomies. The relative risk increase was significant for laparoscopic but not open appendectomies, possibly due to lower absolute risk with no/low glucocorticoid exposure in the laparoscopic subgroup.

The role of gut barrier dysfunction in postoperative complications in liver transplantation: pathophysiological and therapeutic considerations.

PURPOSE: Gut barrier dysfunction is a pivotal pathophysiological alteration in cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease, which is further aggravated during and after the operational procedures for liver transplantation (LT). In this review, we analyze the multifactorial disruption of all major levels of defense of the gut barrier (biological, mechanical, and immunological) and correlate with clinical implications. METHODS: A narrative review of the literature was performed using PubMed, PubMed Central and Google from inception until November 29th, 2023. RESULTS: Systemic translocation of indigenous bacteria through this dysfunctional barrier contributes to the early post-LT infectious complications, while endotoxin translocation, through activation of the systemic inflammatory response, is implicated in non-infectious complications including renal dysfunction and graft rejection. Bacterial infections are the main cause of early in-hospital mortality of LT patients and unraveling the pathophysiology of gut barrier failure is of outmost importance. CONCLUSION: A pathophysiology-based approach to prophylactic or therapeutic interventions may lead to enhancement of gut barrier function eliminating its detrimental consequences and leading to better outcomes for LT patients.

What Is a Surgical Site Infection After Carpal Tunnel Release?

PURPOSE: Considerable variation exists in the literature on published rates of surgical site infection (SSI) after carpal tunnel release, ranging over 20-fold, from 0.28% to 6.4%. The reason for this variability is unknown. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on 748 open carpal tunnel releases performed under wide-awake local anesthetic no tourniquet in an in-office procedure room. The following three different definitions of infection were used for analysis: definition A: prescription of an oral antibiotic; Definition B: SSI definition by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Definition C: infection that required reoperation. RESULTS: Infection rate by definition A was 8.9% (67/748), by definition B was 2.3% (17/748), and by definition C was 0.4% (3/748), resulting in a 22-fold range. CONCLUSIONS: The infection rate after carpal tunnel release is heavily influenced by the definition of SSI. The definition of SSI needs to be considered when making comparisons, either in research or quality assurance/quality improvement applications. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When analyzing SSI rates, the exact definition of infection must be ascertained to accurately compare an individual's practice or institutional data to the literature.

Infectious complications following major heart surgery from the day of the surgery to hospital discharge.

BACKGROUND: At some point in their lives, many people will require major heart surgery (MHS). Patients are generally older adults with various risk factors for infection. However, the incidence of infection after MHS is poorly known, as reported infection data are frequently biased due to different factors like the surgical procedure, postoperative timing, and infectious syndromes or etiologic agents, among others. In addition, most patient data are retrospectively obtained. PURPOSE AND METHODS: Data were prospectively collected regarding the incidence of all nosocomial infections produced from the time of surgery to hospital discharge in a cohort of 800 adults consecutively undergoing a MHS procedure. RESULTS: During postoperative hospitalization, 124 of the 800 participants developed one or more infections (15.5%): during their ICU stay in 68 patients (54.8%), during their stay on the general ward post ICU in 50 (40.3%), and during their stay in both wards in 6 (4.8%). The most common infections were pneumonia (related or not to mechanical ventilation), surgical site and bloodstream. As etiological agents, 193 pathogens were isolated: mostly Gram-negative bacilli (54.4%), followed by Gram-positive bacteria (30%), viruses (4.6%) and fungi (1.5%). In our cohort, all-cause mortality was recorded in 33 participants (4.1%) and 9 infection-related deaths (1.1%) were produced. Among subjects who developed infections, overall mortality was 13.7% and in those who did not, this was only 2.3%. CONCLUSION: Infection following MHS remains frequent and severe. Our data suggest that hospital-acquired infection studies should consider episodes of infection in all populations during their entire hospital stay and not only those related to specific clinical syndromes or acquired while the patient is in intensive care.

From Prevention to Management: Understanding Postoperative Infections in Gynaecology.

This narrative review examines the multifaceted realm of postoperative infections in gynaecology, addressing their significance, types, risk factors, prevention, management, and emerging trends. Postoperative infections, encompassing surgical site infections, urinary tract infections, and pelvic inflammatory disease, pose considerable challenges in patient care, warranting comprehensive exploration. Strategies for prevention include preoperative patient assessment, antimicrobial prophylaxis, and aseptic techniques. Intraoperative measures encompass infection control and instrument sterilization, while postoperative care involves wound management and early infection detection. Diagnostic tools, including blood tests, imaging, and microbiological cultures, aid in timely identification. Management strategies encompass antibiotic therapy, surgical interventions, supportive care, and addressing complications. The review underscores the necessity of personalized approaches, multidisciplinary collaboration, and innovative technologies in future infection management. It calls for ongoing research, heightened awareness, and meticulous care to minimize the impact of postoperative infections and optimize patient outcomes.

Risk factors for postoperative infections in esophageal tumor patients.

Postoperative infections (PI) are a serious complication after esophageal cancer surgery, as they might be correlated with an elevated risk of death. While several reports discuss risk factors for PI in esophageal tumor surgery, there is a limited amount of research on overall postoperative infections. Therefore, investigating the factors that influence PI holds great clinical significance. We retrospectively reviewed surgical data from a cohort of 902 patients diagnosed with esophageal tumors. The study included esophageal cancer patients treated in the Department of Thoracic Surgery at Anyang Tumor Hospital from January to December 2021. Preoperative and operative risk factors for PI were evaluated using univariable and multivariable analyses. The overall incidence of PI was 28.3% (255/902). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that smoking and preoperative hospital stays are significant risk factors for PI after esophageal tumor surgery. Smoking and preoperative hospital stays are identified as risk factors for PI following esophageal tumor surgery. Based on our results, we predict that certain groups of patients may have a higher risk of PI following esophageal tumor surgery. Preventive measures or closely monitor of these patients may be required to reduce the incidence of postoperative PI.

Identifying and Predicting Postoperative Infections Based on Readily Available Electronic Health Record Data.

Identification of postoperative infections based on retrospective patient data is currently done using manual chart review. We used a validated, automated labelling method based on registrations and treatments to develop a high-quality prediction model (AUC 0.81) for postoperative infections.

Association of adherence to individual components of Society of Thoracic Surgeons cardiac surgery antibiotic guidelines and postoperative infections.

OBJECTIVES: The study objectives were to measure the association among the 4 components of Society of Thoracic Surgeons antibiotic guidelines and postoperative complications in a cohort of patients undergoing valve or coronary artery bypass grafting requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, adult patients undergoing coronary revascularization or valvular surgery who received a Surgical Care Improvement Project-compliant antibiotic from January 1, 2016, to April 1, 2021, at a single, tertiary care hospital were included. The primary exposures were adherence to the 4 individual components of Society of Thoracic Surgeons antibiotic best practice guidelines. The association of each component and a combined metric was tested in its association with the primary outcome of postoperative infection as determined by Society of Thoracic Surgeons data abstractors, controlling for several known confounders. RESULTS: Of the 2829 included patients, 1084 (38.3%) received care that was nonadherent to at least 1 aspect of Society of Thoracic Surgeons antibiotic guidelines. The incidence of nonadherence to the 4 individual components was 223 (7.9%) for timing of first dose, 639 (22.6%) for antibiotic choice, 164 (5.8%) for weight-based dose adjustment, and 192 (6.8%) for intraoperative redosing. In adjusted analyses, failure to adhere to first dose timing guidelines was directly associated with Society of Thoracic Surgeons-adjudicated postoperative infection (odds ratio, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.3; P = .02). Failure of weight-adjusted dosing was associated with both postoperative sepsis (odds ratio, 6.9; 95% confidence interval, 2.5-8.5; P < .01) and 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 4.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-11.4; P < .01). No other significant associations among the 4 Society of Thoracic Surgeons metrics individually or as a combination were observed with postoperative infection, sepsis, or 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Nonadherence to Society of Thoracic Surgeons antibiotic best practices is common. Failure of antibiotic timing and weight-adjusted dosing is associated with odds of postoperative infection, sepsis, and mortality after cardiac surgery.

Association of Preoperative Glycated Hemoglobin and Early Postoperative Infections After Elective Craniotomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of preoperative glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) testing is controversial. The available evidence on the role of preoperative HbA1c in predicting postoperative complications after different surgical procedures has been conflicting. The primary aim of our retrospective observational cohort study was to assess the association between preoperative HbA1c and postoperative infections after elective craniotomy. METHODS: We extracted and analyzed data from an internal hospital database on 4564 patients who underwent neurosurgical intervention from January 2017 to May 2022. The primary outcome measure of the present study was infections established in the first week after surgery using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. The records were stratified by the HbA1c values and intervention types. RESULTS: For patients who had undergone brain tumor removal with a preoperative HbA1c ≥6.5%, the odds of early postoperative infections were increased (odds ratio, 2.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-3.72; P = 0.01). We found no association between HbA1c and early postoperative infections for patients who had undergone elective cerebrovascular intervention, cranioplasty, or a minimally invasive procedure. After adjusting for age and gender, the threshold for significant infection risk for neuro-oncological patients increased with an HbA1c ≥7.5% (adjusted odds ratio, 2.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-6.45; P = 0.0058). CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing elective intracranial surgery for brain tumor removal, a preoperative HbA1c ≥7.5% is associated with a higher infection rate within the first postoperative week. Future prospective studies are required to assess the prognostic value of this association for clinical decision-making.

Impact of postoperative intravenous iron therapy on postoperative infections in older patients with severe anaemia after hip fracture surgery.

BACKGROUND: Anaemia is common following hip fracture in ortho-geriatric patients and is associated with postoperative infections.. This study investigated whether intravenous iron supplements reduced the rate of postoperative infections within 30 days postoperatively in older adults after hip fracture surgery. METHODS: This observational study included 198 ortho-geriatric patients July 2018-May 2020. In May 2019 a local guideline was implemented and recommended II therapy on the 3rd postoperative day if haemoglobin concentration was < 6.5 mmol/L after hip fracture surgery. RESULTS: The patients were divided into four treatment groups: blood transfusion (n = 44), IV iron (n = 69), blood transfusion + IV iron (n = 35) and no treatment (n = 50). The number of patients who had an infection within 30 days was similar in the two time periods (38.8% before vs. 38.9% after systematic I.V. iron supplementation, P = 1.00) and no significant difference according to risk of infection was found between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: This study documents no effect of intravenous iron supplements on postoperative infections in older adults after hip fracture surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with the Danish Data Protection Authority (2008-58-0028) the 2th of September 2019.