Effect of prehabilitation exercises on postoperative frailty in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

Background: To improve perioperative frailty status in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery (LCCS), we explored a new intensive prehabilitation program that combines prehabilitation exercises with standard enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and explored its impact. Methods: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial. Between April 2021 to August 2021, patients undergoing elective LCCS were randomized into the standardized ERAS (S-ERAS) group or ERAS based on prehabilitation (group PR-ERAS). Patients in the PR-ERAS group undergoing prehabilitation exercises in the perioperative period in addition to standard enhanced recovery after surgery. We explored the effects of this prehabilitation protocol on frailty, short-term quality of recovery (QoR), psychological status, postoperative functional capacity, postoperative outcomes, and pain. Results: In total, 125 patients were evaluated, and 95 eligible patients were enrolled and randomly allocated to the S-ERAS (n = 45) and PR-ERAS (n = 50) groups. The Fried score was higher in the PR-ERAS group on postoperative day (7 (2(2,3) vs. 3(2,4), P = 0.012). The QoR-9 was higher in the PR-ERAS group than in the S-ERAS group on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 7th postoperative days. The PR-ERAS group had an earlier time to first ambulation (P < 0.050) and time to first flatus (P < 0.050). Conclusion: Prehabilitation exercises can improve postoperative frailty and accelerate recovery in patients undergoing LCCS but may not improve surgical safety. Therefore, better and more targeted prehabilitation recovery protocols should be explored. Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.org , identifier NCT04964856.

The effects of exercise-based prehabilitation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative exercise-based rehabilitation improves the physical performance and health-related outcomes of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, the effectiveness of exercise-based prehabilitation in patients undergoing CABG remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the effects of exercise-based prehabilitation on functional exercise capacity, postoperative complications, anxiety, depression, self-efficacy, quality of life, length of hospital and intensive care unit stay, frailty, and endothelial function in patients undergoing CABG surgery. METHODS: This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The study protocol is recorded in the PROSPERO database (registration number CRD42023488530). PubMed, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to December 2023. The titles and abstracts of the studies were screened using Rayyan Ai software. After full-text screening, randomized controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria were included. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials involving 616 participants were included. The systematic review suggests strong evidence that exercise-based prehabilitation improved functional capacity and moderate evidence that it reduced postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. Although there was conflicting evidence regarding the effects of exercise-based prehabilitation on quality of life, there was limited evidence of its effects on physical activity, anxiety, depression, self-efficacy, frailty, and endothelial function. CONCLUSIONS: Exercise-based prehabilitation can be recommended for improvements in functional capacity, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing CABG.

Prehab, ERAS, Rehab: A patient care continuum around colo-rectal surgery: Prehabilitation combined with ERAS and rehabilitation to reduce morbidity and hospital stay.

BACKGROUND: Prehabilitation (Prehab) programs aim to optimize patients psycho-physical condition before surgery, to improve post-operative outcomes. Although functional benefits of Prehab are known, the clinical impact does not yet have concrete evidence. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Prehab, associated with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) and surgical rehabilitation (Rehab), in frail colorectal oncological patients in terms of morbidity and hospitalization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The cohort of patients undergoing Prehab between January 2020 and December 2022 (Prehab group) is compared with the historical cohort of patients operated on in the period 01/2018-12/2019, not undergoing Prehab (no-Prehab group). Prehab scheme: multimodal (physiotherapy, clinical nutrition and psychological support). All patients followed an ERAS path. Only Prehab patients followed a surgical Rehab by a dedicated nurse case-manager. Propensity score matching (PSM) and weighting (PSW) analyses were used for statistical analysis. PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: complications at 30 days and hospital stay. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: functional outcomes. RESULTS: In 3 years of preliminary enrollment, 36 patients completed the program: 22 in person, 16 in tele-prehab. The Prehab group experienced fewer complications than the no-Prehab group (PSM: 31 % vs 53 % p = 0.02; PSW: 31 % vs 51 % p = 0.02), less severe complications (CCI>20 PSM: 17 % vs 33 % p = 0.074; PSW: 17 % vs 53 % 0.026) and shorter hospital stay (4.5 vs 6 days; p = 0.02). Finally, prehabilitated patients improved their preoperative functional capacity and reduced anxiety levels. CONCLUSION: The strategy of combining Prehab with ERAS and Rehab has positively influenced post-operative clinical outcomes as well as functional parameters in our series.

Prehabilitation to Enhance Vascular Surgery Outcomes: A Narrative Review.

Prehabilitation, an emerging strategy, prepares patients for elective surgery by encouraging healthy behaviors, including physical exercise and healthy nutrition, while providing psychological support, to improve postoperative outcomes and foster healthier lifestyles. Despite growing interest, there is little research on prehabilitation. Specifically, studies involving prehabilitation in vascular surgery are heterogeneous with small sample sizes. This review aimed to investigate the reported positive impact of prehabilitation on vascular surgery patients, discuss prehabilitation models, highlight prehabilitation program-associated challenges, and suggest appropriate interventions. Prehabilitation improves physical fitness, reduces postoperative complications, and enhances overall recovery. Multimodal prehabilitation programs can positively impact vascular surgery patients, with benefits including improved cardiovascular fitness, reduced postoperative complications, shorter postoperative hospital stays, enhanced overall recovery, and improved quality of life. The currently reported prehabilitation programs are heterogeneous, with limitations regarding patient adherence and lack of long-term outcomes, posing challenges to their widespread adoption. Overall, prehabilitation shows promise for improving vascular surgery outcomes and fostering long-term healthy behaviors. The systematic implementation of prehabilitation in vascular surgery care pathways, overcoming reported limitations, and integrating multimodal prehabilitation into routine preoperative care hold potential benefits. This review underscores the need for high-quality research to establish best practices in prehabilitation and integrate them into the standard of care for vascular surgery patients.

Physical and psychological distress amongst patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study compares baseline clinical characteristics, physical function testing, and patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with the goal of better understanding unique patient needs at diagnosis. METHODS: Patients with suspected advanced stage (IIIC/IV) epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing either primary cytoreductive surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy were enrolled in a single-institution, non-randomized prospective behavioral intervention trial of prehabilitation. Baseline clinical characteristics were abstracted. Physical function was evaluated using the Short Physical Performance Battery, Fried Frailty Index, gait speed, and grip strength. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System metrics and the Perceived Stress Scale. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in demographics or clinical characteristics between cohorts at enrollment, with the exception of performance status, clinical stage, and albumin. While gait speed and grip strength were lower amongst neoadjuvant chemotherapy patients, there were no significant differences in physical function using the Short Physical Performance Battery and Fried Frailty Index. Patients in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy cohort reported decreased perception of physical function and increased fatigue on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System metrics. A larger proportion of patients in the neoadjuvant cohort reported severe levels of emotional distress and anxiety, as well as greater perceived stress at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer present with increased psychosocial distress and decreased perception of physical function at diagnosis and may benefit most from early introduction of supportive care.

The Year in Cardiothoracic Transplant Anesthesia: Selected Highlights From 2022 Part I: Lung Transplantation.

These highlights focus on the research in lung transplantation (LTX) that was published in 2022 and includes the assessment and optimization of candidates for LTX, donor optimization, the use of organs from donation after circulatory death, and outcomes when using marginal or novel donors; recipient factors affecting LTX, including age, disease, the use of extracorporeal life support; and special situations, such as coronavirus disease2019, pediatric LTX, and retransplantation. The remainder of the article focuses on the perioperative management of LTX, including the perioperative risk factors for acute renal failure (acute kidney injury); the incidence and management of phrenic nerve injury, delirium, and pain; and the postoperative management of hyperammonemia, early postoperative infections, and the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA to detect rejection.

The effectiveness of exercise prehabilitation on aerobic capacity, muscle strength and body composition in patients with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Cirrhosis is the main cause of morbidity and mortality globally, accounting for approximately 1.2 million deaths annually. Impaired aerobic capacity, muscle wasting and reduced muscle strength are significant complications in patients with cirrhosis. Preoperative exercise intervention "prehabilitation" has been recognised as a potential approach to optimise muscle strength, aerobic capacity and body composition as well as quality of life in patients awaiting abdominal surgery. However, there is little evidence on the effects of preoperative exercise on older adults with cirrhosis and awaiting liver transplant. Thus, the primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be to assess the effects of exercise interventions in improving aerobic capacity, muscle strength and body composition of older adults with cirrhosis and awaiting liver transplant. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This systematic review and metaanalysis protocol was designed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. This systematic review will include all peer-reviewed randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including cluster RCTs, controlled (non-controlled), complex clinical trials (CCTs) or cluster trials, cohort, observational studies published in English from inception until July 2024. The following electronic databases will be searched: MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CINAHL (EBSCO) and Scopus (Elsevier) and supplemented by a secondary screening of the reference lists of all included articles. Searches will involve studies with both male and female participants aged ≥ 18 years with cirrhosis and awaiting liver transplant. Primary outcomes will include muscle strength, and aerobic capacity. The secondary outcomes include body composition (e.g. body mass index, and thigh circumference). The Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool will be used to evaluate quality of the studies and Review Manager (RevMan) V.5.3 (Copenhagen, Denmark: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014). Effect sizes will be expressed as a standardised mean difference, and their 95% confidence intervals will be calculated and presented as a forest plot. The standard χ2 and I2 tests will be used to test heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis is anticipated to provide meaningful and contemporary evidence on the effects of preoperative exercise in older adults living with cirrhosis and awaiting liver transplant. In addition, the findings will help clinicians with developing safe and effective preoperative exercise regimens for these patients.

Home-based exercise prehabilitation to improve disease-free survival and return to intended oncologic treatment after cancer surgery in older adults with frailty: a secondary analysis of a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Improving survivorship for patients with cancer and frailty is a priority. We aimed to estimate whether exercise prehabilitation improves disease-free survival and return to intended oncologic treatment for older adults with frailty undergoing cancer surgery. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of the oncologic outcomes of a randomized trial of patients ≥ 60 yr of age with frailty undergoing elective cancer surgery. Participants were randomized either to a supported, home-based exercise program plus nutritional guidance or to usual care. Outcomes for this analysis were one-year disease-free survival and return to intended oncologic treatment. We estimated complier average causal effects to account for intervention adherence. RESULTS: We randomized 204 participants (102 per arm); 182 were included in our modified intention-to-treat population and, of these participants, 171/182 (94%) had complete one-year follow up. In the prehabilitation group, 18/94 (11%) died or experienced cancer recurrence, compared with 19/88 (11%) in the control group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 2.34; P = 0.49). Return to intended oncologic treatment occurred in 24/94 (29%) patients the prehabilitation group vs 20/88 (23%) in the usual care group (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 0.84 to 2.77; P = 0.16). Complier average causal effects directionally diverged for disease-free survival (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.20 to 4.08; P = 0.90) and increased the point estimate for return to treatment (HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 0.52 to 7.97; P = 0.30), but in both cases the CIs included 1. CONCLUSIONS: Randomization to home-based exercise prehabilitation did not lead to significantly better disease-free survival or earlier return to intended oncologic treatment in older adults with frailty undergoing cancer surgery. Our results could inform future trials powered for more plausible effect sizes, especially for the return to intended oncologic treatment outcome. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02934230 ); first submitted 22 August 2016.

RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: L'amélioration de la survie des personnes atteintes de cancer et de fragilité est une priorité. Nous avons cherché à estimer si la préadaptation physique améliore la survie sans maladie et le retour au traitement oncologique prévu pour les personnes âgées fragiles bénéficiant d'une chirurgie du cancer. MéTHODE: Nous avons effectué une analyse secondaire des issues oncologiques d'une étude randomisée de patient·es âgé·es de 60 ans ou plus atteint·es de fragilité bénéficiant d'une chirurgie carcinologique non urgente. Nous avons randomisé les personnes participantes à un programme d'exercice à domicile accompagné de conseils nutritionnels ou à recevoir les soins habituels. Les critères d'évaluation de cette analyse étaient la survie sans maladie à un an et le retour au traitement oncologique prévu. Nous avons estimé les effets moyens causaux d'observance pour tenir compte de l'adhérence à l'intervention. RéSULTATS: Nous avons randomisé 204 participant·es (102 par bras); 182 personnes ont été incluses dans notre population modifiée en intention de traiter et, parmi ces participant·es, 171/182 (94%) ont fait l'objet d'un suivi complet à un an. Dans le groupe préadaptation, 18/94 (11%) personnes sont décédées ou ont connu une récidive du cancer, contre 19/88 (11 %) dans le groupe témoin (rapport de risque [HR], 1,25; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95%, 0.66 à 2.34; P = 0.49). Le retour au traitement oncologique prévu a eu lieu chez 24 patient·es sur 94 (29 %) dans le groupe préadaptation vs 20/88 (23 %) dans le groupe de soins habituels (RR, 1.53; IC 95%, 0.84 à 2.77; P = 0.16). Les effets moyens causaux d'observance ont divergé directionnellement pour la survie sans maladie (RR, 0.91; IC 95%, 0.20 à 4.08; P = 0.90) et augmenté l'estimation ponctuelle du retour au traitement (RR, 2.04; IC 95%, 0.52 à 7.97; P = 0.30), mais dans les deux cas, les IC comprenaient 1. CONCLUSION: La randomisation pour la préadaptation physique à domicile n'a pas entraîné d'amélioration significative de la survie sans maladie ou de retour plus précoce au traitement oncologique prévu chez les personnes âgées fragiles bénéficiant d'une chirurgie du cancer. Nos résultats pourraient éclairer de futures études alimentées par des tailles d'effet plus plausibles, en particulier pour le critère de retour prévu au traitement oncologique. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02934230 ); première soumission le 22 août 2016.

Preoperative nutritional support to tackle morbidity in multivisceral resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma. Early outcomes from a novel nutritional prehabilitation program in a prospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of the implementation of a routinely prehabilitation nutritional program (PNP) in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) patients. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Rate of preoperative malnutrition is scarcely evaluated in RPS patients and the efficacy of a PNP in detecting and reverting malnutrition has not been studied. METHODS: Prospective study in a high-volume reference center for RPS; adult patients with primary or persistent RPS deemed surgically resectable were enrolled in a PNP. RESULTS: 119 patients underwent surgery for RPS at Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori in Milan, 73 (61.3 %) were enrolled in the PNP while the remaining served as control cohort. 43.8 % (32/73), 28.8 % (21/73), and 27.4 % (20/73) were classified as non-malnourished, moderately malnourished, and severely malnourished at diagnosis, respectively. Preoperative nutritional support was provided to 35 out of 73 patients (47.9 %). Among untreated patients 20 of 38 (52.6 %) experienced a preoperative worsening of their nutritional status, whereas among those in the prehabilitation program 16 of 35 (45.7 %) showed improvement. Surgical complications did not significantly differ between malnourished and non-malnourished patients, potentially due to increased use of diverting stomas in malnourished patients to prevent infectious complications. Reversal of initial malnutrition correlated with better postoperative outcomes, as evidenced by lower rates of severe complications (OR: 0.18, 95%CI 0.04-0.75, p = 0.02) and a lower Comprehensive Complication Index (OR: -0.28, 95%CI -0.51 to -0.06, p = 0.02) in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a prehabilitation nutritional program brought relevant benefits in terms of postoperative morbidity.

A case report of cardiopulmonary exercise testing and incentive spirometry-guided breathing pattern alteration for a severely tachypnoeic kyphoscoliotic patient undergoing major thoracic surgery for suspected lung malignancy.

A case report of a severely dyspnoeic kyphoscoliotic patient intended for an elective major thoracic surgery for suspected lung malignancy. With baseline near maximal breathing frequency and shallow breaths and poor lung mechanics, the first encountered anaesthetist considered this patient too high risk for lobectomy. This case illustrated the application of cardiopulmonary exercise testing to provide an objective assessment of the patient's functional capacity, ventilatory efficiency and delineation of modifiable respiratory components that guide the formulation of individualized prehabilitation programme. It also depicted the perioperative role of an off-label use of incentive spirometry in providing visual feedbacks and led to subsequent assessment breathing pattern alternation. Patient underwent the lung resection uneventfully and returned to normal lifestyle on postoperative day 4.

Survivor to thriver: identifying and overcoming the psychological effects of a stoma.

Stoma-forming surgery can have extensive, negative impacts on a patient's psychological wellbeing. Although this has been known for several decades, little progress has been made in addressing the issue. Several areas of concern have been repeatedly identified in the literature: loss of control; reduced self-esteem; psychosexual issues; and the impact of enhanced recovery on psychological outcomes. While these issues have the potential to significantly affect patients undergoing stoma-forming surgery, they can be mitigated against. While identifying and addressing psychological morbidity at an early stage is the most effective approach, additional interventions can also be useful. The promotion of self-care and independence can minimise the feeling of loss of control, the selection of discreet, leak-proof products can help address self-esteem issues, and open, honest conversation can significantly improve a patient's feelings regarding sexuality and intimacy.

The role of prehabilitation in HNSCC patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy (RT) is used in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with excellent effectiveness, but it is burdened by important side effects, which may negatively impact patients' quality of life (QoL). In particular when associated with chemotherapy (CT), that has a radiosensitising effect (and its own toxicities), it is responsible for several adverse events, causing social discomfort and lower QoL, in patients who are already experiencing several tumor-related discomforts. Prehabilitation is a healthcare intervention consisting of several specialist visits prior to the start of treatment, with the aim of improving the patient's health status, resolving symptoms that interfere with treatment and impact QoL, and finally to better avoid or overcome complications. Of all cancer patients, HNSCC patients are among those who could benefit most from prehabilitation, both because of the high number of symptoms and toxicities and their difficult management. Despite this and the emerging data, prehabilitation is not often considered for the majority of patients undergoing (C)RT. In this review, we tried to understand what are the main areas in which interventions can be made prior to the (C)RT start, the possible side effects of the treatment, the effectiveness in their prevention and management, and the impact that prehabilitation may have in adherence to therapy and on the principal survival outcomes, providing important guidance for the planning of future studies. EVIDENCES AND CONCLUSIONS: Although there is no strong data evaluating multidisciplinary prehabilitation strategies, evidence shows that optimizing the patient's health status and preventing possible complications improve the QoL, reduce the incidence and severity of adverse events, and improve treatment adherence. While cardiology prehabilitation is of paramount importance for all patients undergoing concomitant CRT in the prevention of possible side effects, the remaining interventions are useful independently of the type of treatment proposed. Geriatricians have a key role in both elderly patients and younger patients characterized by many comorbidities to comprehensively assess health status and indicate which treatment may be the best in terms of risk/benefit ratio. Collaboration between nutritionists and phoniatrics, on the other hand, ensures adequate nutritional intake for the patient, where possible orally. This is because optimizing both body weight and muscle mass and qualities has been shown to impact key survival outcomes. Finally, HNSCC patients have the second highest suicide rate, and the disease has side effects such as pain, dysfiguration, and sialorrhea that can reduce the patient's social life and create shame and embarrassment: A psychological intake, in addition to the usefulness to the patient, can also provide current support to caregivers and family members. Therefore clinicians must define a personalized pathway for patients, considering the characteristics of the disease and the type of treatment proposed, to optimize health status and prevent possible side effects while also improving QoL and treatment adherence.

Embedding Multimodal Rehabilitation Within Routine Cancer Care in Sheffield-The Active Together Service Evaluation Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 3 million people in the United Kingdom are currently living with or beyond cancer. People undergoing treatment for cancer are at risk of complications following treatment. Increasing evidence supports the role of rehabilitation (including prehabilitation) in enhancing psychological and physical well-being in patients with cancer and improving outcomes. Active Together is an evidence-based, multimodal rehabilitation service for patients with cancer, providing support to help patients prepare for and recover from treatment. This paper presents the evaluation protocol for the Active Together service, aiming to determine its impact on patient-reported outcomes and clinical endpoints, as well as understand processes and mechanisms that influence its delivery and outcomes. METHODS: This evaluation comprises an outcome and process evaluation, with service implementation data integrated into the analysis of outcome measures. The outcome evaluation will assess changes in outcomes of patients that attend the service and compare health care resource use against historical data. The process evaluation will use performance indicators, semistructured interviews, and focus groups to explore mechanisms of action and contextual factors influencing delivery and outcomes. Integrating psychological change mechanisms with outcome data might help to clarify complex causal pathways within the service. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence to support the role of multimodal rehabilitation before, during, and after cancer treatment is increasing. The translation of that evidence into practice is less advanced. Findings from this evaluation will contribute to our understanding of the real-world impact of cancer rehabilitation and strengthen the case for widespread adoption of rehabilitation into routine care for people with cancer.

Gastrointestinal cancer surgery in the elderly: The effects of preoperative oral nutritional supplements - A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The current study aimed to explore the effect of nutritional prehabilitation on the clinical prognosis of elderly patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study was conducted, where participants were divided into two groups based on whether they received oral nutritional supplementation at the first outpatient visit. The nutritional prehabilitation group (n=41) adopted a nutritional prehabilitation mode (a standard energy intake of 25-30 kcal/kg· d was recommended). While the control group (n=55) received routine care. All patients underwent laparoscopic surgery according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Changes in nutritional status, complications, psychological status, symptoms, hospitalization days, and expenditures were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Both groups of patients experienced weight loss. However, the decline in body weight in the prehabilitation group was less than that in the control group (-1.88 vs. -2.56 kg, p < 0.001). In the comparison of nutritional prehabilitation group and control group, significant improvements were observed in the Hospital Anxiety Scale scores (5 vs. 5, p = 0.01) and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory scores (3 vs. 0, p < 0.001) respectively. The infection rate in the nutritional prehabilitation group was lower than that in the control group (17.1% vs. 36.4%, p = 0.04). Additionally, patients in the nutritional prehabilitation group had significantly fewer hospitalization days at discharge (14.3 vs. 17.1 days, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery, a nutritional prehabilitation model may help maintain better physical and mental status, reduce infection rates, and shorten hospitalization days.

Exploring the acceptability of and adherence to prehabilitation and rehabilitation in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Prehabilitation combines exercise, nutritional, and psychological interventions administered before surgery to improve patient outcomes. This comprehensive review and meta-analysis examined the feasibility, adherence, and effectiveness of prehabilitation in frail, high-risk individuals undergoing major abdominal surgery. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases to identify relevant studies evaluating prehabilitation programs published between 2010 and 2023, either as observational studies or randomized clinical trials (RCTs). RESULTS: The 23 articles (13 RCTs and 10 observational studies) included 1849 older male and female patients aged 68.7 ± 7.2 years. Nineteen of the included studies reported on adherence to prehabilitation programmes, which was generally good (>75%) over different models, settings, and durations. Factors such as patients' desire for expedited surgery, self-assessment of fitness, personal and professional obligations, health issues, holidays, and advancement of surgery dates negatively affected adherence to prehabilitation programmes. When compared with rehabilitation or standard pre- and post-surgical care, prehabilitation was associated with a 25%, albeit not statistically significant reduction in postoperative complications, according to data from 14 studies reporting on postoperative complications (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.17, P = 0.43; I2 = 65%). Prehabilitation has been found to improve the 6-min walk test significantly by 29.4 m (MD +29.4 m, 95% CI 5.6 to 53.3, P = 0.02; I2 = 39%), compared with rehabilitation or standard pre- and post-surgical care. CONCLUSION: Prehabilitation was acceptable to patients, with good adherence, and improved physical function.

If the peri-operative patient pathway was right, what would it look like?

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing surgery deserve the best possible peri-operative outcomes. Each stage of the peri-operative patient journey offers opportunities to improve care delivery, with shorter lengths of stay, less complications, reduced costs and better value. METHODS: These opportunities were identified through narrative review of the literature, with consultation and consensus at the hidden pandemic (of postoperative complications) summit 2, July 2023 in Adelaide, Australia RESULTS: Before surgery: Some patients who receive timely alternative treatments may not need surgery at all. The period of waiting after listing should be a time of preparation. Risk assessment at the time of surgical listing facilitates recognition of need for comorbidity optimisation and identifies those who will most benefit from prehabilitation, particularly frail and deconditioned patients. DURING SURGERY: During the surgical admission, ERAS programs result in less postoperative complications, shorter length of stay and better patient experience but require agreement between clinicians, and coordinated monitoring of delivery of the elements in the ERAS bundle of care. AFTER SURGERY: At-risk patients need to have the appropriate levels of monitoring for cardiovascular instability, renal impairment or respiratory dysfunction, to facilitate timely, proactive management if they develop. Access to allied health in the early postoperative period is also critical for promoting mobility, and earlier discharge, particularly after joint surgery. Where appropriate, provision of rehabilitation services at home improves patient experience and adds value. The peri-operative patient journey begins and ends with primary care so there is a need for clear communication, documentation, around sharing of responsibility between practitioners at each stage. CONCLUSION: Identifying and mitigating risk to reduce complications and length of stay in hospital will improve outcomes for patients and deliver the best value for the health system.

Prehabilitation: The underutilised weapon for chronic pain management.

Objective: Prehabilitation encompasses preparatory clinical intervention(s) delivered during the period between diagnosis and treatment commencement. Despite widespread successful usage preoperatively, psychological prehabilitation is neglected in outpatient chronic pain management. Although pain management waitlists are associated with treatment attrition and psychological and physical decline, this time window is underutilised in preventing escalation. Waitlists present an under-explored opportunity to 'prehabilitate' patients waiting for treatment. This topical review aimed to: (1) examine the effectiveness of psychological prehabilitation for pain services; (2) evaluate the psychological and physical decline associated with waiting for pain management; (3) highlight key psychological prehabilitative targets for increasing treatment engagement; (4) promote pain management psychological prehabilitation within personalised pain medicine, building recommendations for future interventions. Methods: Studies regarding the impact of waitlists and prehabilitation for chronic pain were reviewed. Results: Findings demonstrated that the psychological constructs of patient expectations, health locus of control, self-efficacy and pain catastrophizing dynamically influence attrition, treatment engagement and outcomes while waiting. These constructs are amenable to change, emphasising their potential utility within a targeted waitlist intervention. Conclusions: Prehabilitating chronic pain patients towards treatment engagement could circumvent cycles of failed treatment seeking, preventing psychological and physical decline, and reducing healthcare utilisation. Utilising the waitlist to identify psychosocial risk factors (external health locus of control, low self-efficacy and high pain catastrophizing) would identify who requires additional support to prevent increased risk of treatment failure, enhancing personalised care before prescribed treatment is accessed. This review cements the urgent need for pain services to engage proactively with prehabilitation innovation.

Study protocol for a single-site feasibility study evaluating the adoption and fidelity of Prep-4-RT: prehabilitation for head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Prep-4-RT is a co-designed stepped-care multimodal prehabilitation program for people scheduled to receive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC). Prehabilitation, which occurs between diagnosis and treatment commencement, aims to improve a patient's health to reduce the incidence and severity of current and future impairments. HNC treatment can be distressing and has detrimental impacts on function and quality of life. HNC patients have increased social vulnerabilities including higher rates of socio-economic disadvantage and engagement in lifestyle habits which increase cancer risk. High levels of physical and psychological impacts of HNC treatment and increased social vulnerabilities of this population warrant investigation of optimal pathways of care, such as prehabilitation. This paper describes a research protocol to evaluate the feasibility of Prep-4-RT, which was designed to prepare HNC patients for the physical and psychological impacts of radiotherapy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: At least sixty adult HNC patients, scheduled to receive radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy), will be recruited over a five-month period. All participants will receive access to Prep-4-RT self-management resources. Participants identified through screening as high-risk will also be offered individualised interventions with relevant allied health professionals prior to the commencement of radiotherapy (psychologists, dietitians, speech pathologists and physiotherapists). Participants will complete evaluation surveys assessing their experiences with Prep-4-RT resources and interventions. Clinicians will also complete program evaluation surveys. Primary feasibility outcomes include adoption (uptake and intention to try) and fidelity (adherence to the specialist prehabilitation pathway). Secondary feasibility outcomes include acceptability (patient and clinician) of and satisfaction (patient) with Prep-4-RT as well as operational costs. Feasibility outcome data will be analysed using exact binomial and one-sample t tests, as appropriate. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre in Melbourne, Australia. Results will be presented at national conferences and published in peer-reviewed journal(s) so that it can be accessed by clinicians involved in the care of HNC patients receiving radiotherapy. If the model of care is found to be feasible and acceptable, the transferability and scalability to other cancer centres, or for other cancer types, may be investigated. REGISTRATION DETAILS: ANZCTA (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry) ACTRN12623000770662.

Differential response to preoperative exercise training in patients candidates to cardiac valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: There is lack of evidence regarding safety, effectiveness and applicability of prehabilitation on cardiac surgery population, particularly in patients candidates to cardiac valve replacement. The aim of the study is to assess and compare the effect of a multimodal prehabilitation program on functional capacity in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AoS) and severe mitral regurgitation (MR) proposed for valve replacement surgery. METHODS: Secondary analysis from a randomised controlled trial whose main objective was to analyze the efficacy of a 4-6 weeks multimodal prehabilitation program in cardiac surgery on reducing postoperative complications. For this secondary analysis, only candidates for valve replacement surgery were selected. The primary outcome was the change in endurance time (ET) from baseline to preoperative assessment measured by a cycling constant work-rate cardiopulmonary exercise test. RESULTS: 68 patients were included in this secondary analysis, 34 (20 AoS and 14 MR) were allocated to the prehabilitation group and 34 (20 AoS and 14 MR) to control group. At baseline, patients with AoS had better left systolic ventricular function and lower prevalence of atrial fibrillation compared to MR (p = 0.022 and p = 0.035 respectively). After prehabilitation program, patients with MR showed greater improvement in ET than AoS patients (101% vs. 66% increase from baseline). No adverse events related to the prehabilitation program were observed. CONCLUSIONS: A 4-6 week exercise training program is safe and overall improves functional capacity in patients with severe AoS and MR. However, exercise response is different according to the cardiac valve type disfunction, and further studies are needed to know the factors that predispose some patients to have better training response. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study has been registered on the Registry of National Institutes of Health ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03466606) (05/03/2018).