Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: Postoperative Quality of Life in Ethiopian Women.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has a profound influence on a woman's quality of life (QoL). Assessment of QoL using patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in pelvic organ prolapse surgery is common practice in developed countries, but despite the burden of POP in developing countries, such as Ethiopia, the use of PROs to record preoperative and postoperative QoL scores is limited. This study is aimed at assessing the QoL among Ethiopian women with POP before and after surgery using the validated Pelvic Organ Quality of Life (P-QoL) questionnaire. Additionally, we will compare postoperative QoL measurements of reconstructive procedures with those of obliterative procedures. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study conducted at a single hospital in Ethiopia on women who were scheduled for surgery for symptomatic POP. Patients' QoL was assessed preoperatively using the P-QoL questionnaire and at each subsequent follow-up visit for 1 year (3, 6, 9, and 12 months). Patients undergoing an obliterative procedure were evaluated and compared with those having reconstructive procedures. RESULTS: The mean score for general health perceptions, prolapse impact, role limitations, physical limitations, social limitations, and emotions was 0 at 12 months postoperatively. Despite significant improvements from baseline, personal relationships, sleep or energy disturbance, and symptom severity measures continued to negatively impact QoL at 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life among Ethiopian women with POP is poor across all domains. Native tissue repair employing either reconstructive or obliterative methods significantly improves QoL across all domains up to 12 months postoperatively. The use of validated tools to assess PROs is essential to provide evidence-based care that improves QoL in ways that are meaningful to patients.

Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy: Impact on Sexual Function.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Sacrocolpopexy (SCP) is the gold standard surgical management of apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP), and increasingly, minimally invasive SCP is being adopted as a primary treatment for advanced uterovaginal prolapse. Patients undergoing surgery for POP consider postoperative improvement in sexual function to be a highly important outcome, and sexual dysfunction and dyspareunia severe adverse events. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the impact of minimally invasive SCP on postoperative sexual function. We aimed to analyze the current literature available to discuss the impact of minimally invasive SCP on postoperative sexual function. METHODS: We performed a narrative review of minimally invasive SCP and its impact on sexual function. PubMed and EMBASE were searched from inception through 28 January 2024 for studies that reported sexual function following surgery for POP. Baseline and postoperative sexual activity, dyspareunia, and validated questionnaire scores for sexual function were documented. RESULTS: Minimally invasive SCP is associated with improved postoperative sexual function, increased rates of postoperative sexual activity, and low rates of dyspareunia. Dyspareunia was not associated with mesh related complications. Patients with baseline dyspareunia or pain were more likely to experience persistent dyspareunia after surgery. CONCLUSION: The rates of POP are increasing in our aging population, and sexual function is very important to patients undergoing surgery for POP. Clinicians should consider all factors related to sexual function when planning surgery for POP and address dyspareunia prior to surgery. Sexual function appears to improve overall after minimally invasive SCP and de novo dyspareunia rates are low.

Urolithiasis diagnosed with endovaginal ultrasound after vaginal prolapse repair surgery using mesh: A case report.

Pain after vaginal prolapse repair surgery with mesh is generally attributed to the mesh fixation, particularly to mesh erosion, dislocation or the development of hematoma. However, once all the causes have been excluded, the urinary system, bladder and ureters should be accurately examined by means of endovaginal ultrasound. This report concerns the case of a 72-year-old woman who had undergone mesh-supported prolapse surgery 3 months prior, with no other relevant diseases, who visited the emergency department complaining of dull, right-sided colic pain. The endovaginal ultrasound examination revealed a prevesical ureteral calculus on the right side with consequent dilatation of the proximal ureter. Computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis confirmed the calculus in the distal right ureter and revealed a right renal lower pole calculus. The patient underwent treatment via an operative ureterorenoscopy with removal of stones and placement of a double-J-stent. Two months later, a second ureterorenoscopy was performed with double-J-stent removal and concomitant stone extraction. It appears that no similar cases have been reported in the literature. This is why, during the urogynecological postoperative follow-up, it is of paramount importance to examine the entire urogenital system with endovaginal ultrasound. This case report highlights how, through a simple, non-invasive, radiation-free examination, like ultrasound, most of the post-operative complications of vaginal prolapse repair surgery using mesh, including urolithiasis, can be excluded.

A 5-year evaluation of quality of life, pelvic discomfort, and sexual function following posterior pericervical repair.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of life, pelvic discomfort, and sexual function of patients who underwent posterior pericervical repair or level I to III surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) after 5 years of follow-up. This retrospective cohort study enrolled 107 women with POP who were referred to the Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, an academic center affiliated with the Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, from 2014 to 2021. The patients underwent transvaginal surgery using native tissue, in which the rectovaginal fascia was attached to the pericervical ring. The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Module (ICIQ-FLUTSsex) questionnaires were completed by each patient before and 5 years after surgery. Of the 107 patients, only 78 completed the 5-year follow-up. The mean PFDI-20 scores before, 12 months, and 5 years after surgery were 141.87 ± 34.48, 100.87 ± 26.48, and 37.49 ± 56.39, respectively, indicating a significant improvement in the patients' symptoms after surgery (P < 0.001). The total mean score of ICIQ-FLUTSsex was 3.67 ± 3.63 (range, 0-10). In total, 22 (28.2%) women had an ICIQ-FLUTSsex score of 0, indicating no problems. The attachment of the rectovaginal fascia to the pericervical rings can be an effective surgical technique for correcting posterior vaginal wall prolapses, without significant morbidity. The PFDI-20 score improved significantly from before surgery to 12 months and 5 years after surgery.

Effect of Body Mass Index on Complications After Vaginal and Laparoscopic Apical Prolapse Surgery.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Obesity is increasing worldwide, and data are limited on how body mass index (BMI) affects surgical risk in pelvic organ prolapse. This study is aimed at evaluating the impact of obesity on outcomes after apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery. We hypothesize that obese patients have higher rates of postoperative complications. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2014 to 2018. Current Procedural Terminology codes identified subjects aged 18-89 who underwent apical prolapse repair, including vaginal colpopexy and laparoscopic or robotic sacrocolpopexy. Minor and major complications were analyzed using the World Health Organization BMI category. Regression analysis was performed to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: The total cohort was 24,718 with 15,137 vaginal colpopexy and 9,581 laparoscopic/robotic sacrocolpopexy. The average age was 60.1, 76.5% were white, 24.2% were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 3 or 4, and 44.7% had a major medical comorbidity. Eight hundred and eighty-five patients (5.4%) experienced a minor complication, 324 (2.0%) a major complication, and 1,167 (7.2%) any complication. There was no difference in any, major, or minor complication by BMI and this persisted after adjusting for age, race, ASA class, smoking, and surgical approach. CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in complication rates after apical prolapse surgery by BMI regardless of age, race, ASA class, smoking use, and surgical approach. Patients and surgeons should be reassured that minimally invasive apical prolapse surgery is safe, with low complication rates. Randomized controlled trials are needed to verify these findings.

Early Removal of Indwelling Catheter and Vaginal Pack After Vaginal Prolapse Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: After vaginal pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery a vaginal pack and indwelling bladder catheter are inserted to reduce blood loss and bladder overdistension. The ideal timing of removal remains unclear. In this study we compared removal of vaginal pack and indwelling catheter 3 h post-surgery with removal the next day. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study performed in the Netherlands included patients undergoing POP surgery between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2020. Patients in whom the vaginal pack and catheter were removed the day after surgery (group A) were compared with patients in which the vaginal pack and catheter were removed 3 h post-surgery (group B). Both groups were compared regarding urinary retention and the need for re-intervention owing to active blood loss within 6 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics, such as age, type of operation and type of anaesthesia in group A (n = 280) and group B (n = 207) were comparable. No significant differences were found regarding complications such as urinary retention (17.2 versus 23.2%; p = 0.255). The rates of re-intervention because of active blood loss and occurrence of infection were also comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Removal of the indwelling catheter and vaginal pack 3 h after vaginal POP surgery does not lead to more postoperative complications than removal the 1st day after surgery. Therefore, early removal is a feasible and safe alternative to the standard timing of removal the morning after surgery of women undergoing POP surgery. In the future this could help with introducing same-day discharge.

Changes in Stress Urinary Incontinence Symptoms after Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: a Nationwide Cohort Study (FINPOP).

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Various strategies are employed to manage stress urinary incontinence (SUI) during pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery. This study was aimed at facilitating shared decision-making by evaluating SUI symptom changes, staged SUI procedures, and their prognostic factors following POP surgery without concomitant SUI intervention. METHODS: We analyzed 2,677 POP surgeries from a population-based observational cohort, excluding patients with prior SUI surgery. The outcome measures were subjective SUI utilizing the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 questionnaire and number of subsequent SUI procedures. Multivariable linear models were applied to identify predictors of persistent SUI, procedures for persistent SUI, and de novo SUI. The primary assessment occurred at the 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: At baseline, 50% (1,329 out of 2,677) experienced SUI; 35% (354 out of 1,005) resolved, an additional 14% (140 out 1,005) improved, and 5.1% (67 out of 1,308) underwent a procedure for persistent SUI. De novo SUI symptoms developed in 20% (218 out of 1,087), with 3.2% (35 out of 1,087) reporting bothersome symptoms; 0.8% (11 out of 1,347) underwent a procedure for de novo SUI. High baseline symptom severity increased the risk of persistent SUI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.65-2.53), whereas advanced preoperative apical prolapse decreased the risk (aOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.85-0.93). De novo SUI was more common with advancing age (aOR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05), baseline urgency urinary incontinence (aOR 1.21, 95% CI 1.06-1.38), and after transvaginal mesh surgery (aOR 1.93, 95% CI 1.24-3.00). It was not dependent on the compartment or preoperative degree of prolapse. CONCLUSIONS: In a pragmatic setting, POP surgery results in a low rate of subsequent SUI procedures.

Prevalence and management of urinary incontinece after pelvic organ prolapse surgery (sacrocolpopexy). A literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is frequently associated with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and may occur after its surgical treatment. AIM: To determine the incidence, risk factors and management of SUI during and after POP surgery through a review of the available literature. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Narrative literature review on the incidence and management of SUI after POP surgery after search of relevant manuscripts indexed in PubMed, EMBASE and Scielo published in Spanish and English between 2013 and 2023. RESULTS: Occult SUI is defined as visible urine leakage when prolapse is reduced in patients without SUI symptoms. De novo SUI develops after prolapse surgery without having previously existed. In continent patients, the number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one case of de novo SUI is estimated to be 9 patients and about 17 to avoid repeat incontinence surgery. In patients with occult UI, the NNT to avoid repeat incontinence surgery is around 7. Patients with POP and concomitant SUI are the group most likely to benefit from combined surgery with a more favorable NNT (NNT 2). CONCLUSION: Quality studies on combined surgery for treatment SUI and POP repair are lacking. Continent patients with prolapse should be warned of the risk of de novo SUI, although concomitant incontinence treatment is not currently recommended. Incontinence surgery should be considered on an individual basis in patients with prolapse and SUI.

The double-edged sword of mesh use in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a case report.

Introduction: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a prevalent condition among parous women, often warranting surgical intervention. This case accentuates the complications associated with mesh in POP surgeries, iterating the imperative need for an evidence-based approach towards its utilization and exhaustive patient counselling. Case presentation: A 60-year-old female, post-mesh-augmented POP repair, embarked on a 13-year journey characterized by persistent pelvic pain and multiple interventions. Despite undergoing several surgeries across different countries, involving mesh and stone removals, her symptoms, notably pelvic pain and dyspareunia, persisted. Clinical examinations revealed mesh erosion into the perivesical tissue, bladder, and associated stones, which were addressed through multiple interventions, albeit with transient success. Discussion: The complex journey of this patient exemplifies the intricate challenges mesh poses in POP surgeries. While mesh application offers a minimally invasive approach and has proven successful in numerous cases, it simultaneously opens a Pandora's box of potential severe complications, necessitating thorough patient counselling and post-surgery management. Conclusion: The case delineates the challenging path that clinicians and patients tread when navigating through mesh-associated complications post-POP repair. Although mesh has been heralded as a revolutionary approach in POP surgeries, its potential drawbacks necessitate judicious application, ensuring clinicians are well-versed with its associated risks and are adept in managing ensuing complications.

Restrictive opioid prescribing after surgery for prolapse and incontinence: a randomized, noninferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Opioids are routinely prescribed for postoperative pain control after gynecologic surgery with growing evidence showing that most prescribed opioids go unused. Restrictive opioid prescribing has been implemented in other surgical specialties to combat the risk for opioid misuse and diversion. The impact of this practice in the urogynecologic patient population is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine if a restrictive opioid prescription protocol is noninferior to routine opioid prescribing in terms of patient satisfaction with pain control after minor and major surgeries for prolapse and incontinence. STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-center, randomized, noninferiority trial of opioid-naïve patients who underwent minor (eg, colporrhaphy or mid-urethral sling) or major (eg, vaginal or minimally invasive abdominal prolapse repair) urogynecologic surgery. Patients were excluded if they had contraindications to all multimodal analgesia and if they scored ≥30 on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Subjects were randomized on the day of surgery to the standard opioid prescription protocol (wherein patients routinely received an opioid prescription upon discharge [ie, 3-10 tablets of 5 mg oxycodone]) or to the restrictive protocol (no opioid prescription unless the patient requested one). All patients received multimodal pain medications. Participants and caregivers were not blinded. Subjects were asked to record their pain medication use and pain levels for 7 days. The primary outcome was satisfaction with pain control reported at the 6-week postoperative visit. We hypothesized that patient satisfaction with the restrictive protocol would be noninferior to those randomized to the standard protocol. The noninferiority margin was 15 percentage points. Pain level scores, opioid usage, opioid prescription refills, and healthcare use were secondary outcomes assessed for superiority. RESULTS: A total of 133 patients were randomized, and 127 (64 in the standard arm and 63 in the restrictive arm) completed the primary outcome evaluation and were included in the analysis. There were no statistically significant differences between the study groups, and this remained after adjusting for the surgery type. Major urogynecologic surgery was performed in 73.6% of the study population, and minor surgery was performed in 26.4% of the population. Same-day discharge occurred for 87.6% of all subjects. Patient satisfaction was 92.2% in the standard protocol arm and 92.1% in the restrictive protocol arm (difference, -0.1%; P=.004), which met the criterion for noninferiority. No opioid usage in the first 7 days after hospital discharge was reported by 48.4% of the patients in the standard protocol arm and by 70.8% in the restrictive protocol arm (P=.009). Opioid prescription refills occurred in 8.5% of patients with no difference between the study groups (9.4% in the standard arm vs 6.7% in the restrictive arm; P=.661). No difference was seen in the rate of telephone calls and urgent visits for pain control between the study arms. CONCLUSION: Among women who underwent minor and major surgery for prolapse and incontinence, patient satisfaction rates were noninferior after restrictive opioid prescribing when compared with routine opioid prescribing.

Impact of preoperative pelvic floor muscle function on the success of surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study was to identify the potential characteristics of pelvic floor muscles (PFM) in the preoperative assessment that could be associated with post-surgical prolapse severity. We hypothesized that the same variables, if identified, could be addressed in preoperative rehabilitation to improve surgical results. METHODS: This was a single-center prospective observational study that included women who underwent surgical pelvic organ prolapse repair between 2020-2022. Genital prolapse was evaluated according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. All the participants underwent a PFM assessment, including a vaginal digital assessment and manometry (Peritron™ 9300 V) before surgery and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups. Several PFM variables were recorded: vaginal resting pressure, vaginal pressure during maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), area under the curve during a 10-second MVC, ability to correctly contract the PFMs, and reflexive activation during cough and relaxation. The primary endpoint of the analysis was objective surgical success defined as POP-Q 0 or 1 at the 6-month follow-up. Additionally, a change in pelvic floor muscle function was recorded during postoperative visits. RESULTS: A total of 106 females were included in the study. Fifty-one were lost during the 6-month follow-up, which is a major limitation of the study. None of the examined parameters evaluating PFM were associated with surgical success. No statistically significant difference was found in MVC and PFM endurance before and after surgery. Post-surgery, a significant change was observed in the vaginal resting pressure and the ability to correct PFM activation and relaxation. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative PFM function is not associated with surgical success 6 months after surgery.

Long-term effects of vaginal surgery and endogenous ovarian hormones on the vagina and bladder.

Background: Surgery is a common treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP); however, risk of recurrence and reoperation is high, resulting in a negative impact on quality of life and sexual function. Aim: To examine the long-term effects of POP surgery and endogenous circulating ovarian hormones on the vagina and bladder. Methods: Our animal model simulated surgical injury of the vagina and bladder during POP surgery. Female Rowett nude rats were divided into 4 groups: intact control (IC), vaginal surgery only (V), ovariectomy only (O), and ovariectomy + vaginal surgery (OV). Rats were euthanized 10 weeks postsurgery. Proximal vagina and bladder dome/trigone underwent (1) organ bath myography to assess smooth muscle contractility; (2) real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction to quantify mRNA expression of elastin, collagen I and III, and PGP9.5 (protein gene product 9.5); (3) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for protein quantification of elastin and collagen I and III; and (4) hematoxylin-eosin/immunohistochemistry staining. Outcomes: The primary outcome was tissue contractility as measured by organ bath myography. Secondary outcomes included gene and protein expression of collagen I and III and elastin. Results: O and OV showed reduced vaginal wall contractility vs IC and V (P < .002). Bladder dome and trigone displayed different contractile patterns, with significant differences between O and OV (P < .05), suggesting a negative effect from surgery rather than ovariectomy. OV demonstrated consistent reductions in contractility and elastin/collagen protein expression for the vagina and bladder vs IC. V had similar contractility and increased collagen I expression vs IC, suggesting a protective effect of ovarian hormones. Vaginal epithelium thinning was confirmed in the ovariectomized groups (P = .001), although there was no statistical significance in muscularis thinning with surgery or ovariectomy. O, V, and OV showed significant downregulation of PGP9.5 mRNA expression vs IC. Clinical Translation: These data allow researchers to gain insights into the long-term effects of surgery and deprivation of ovarian hormones. Future studies can use this animal model to investigate other mechanisms that may affect long-term tissue changes due to surgical intervention. Strengths and Limitations: Major strengths are long-term data on the effects of POP surgery and development of an animal model for future studies. However, the animal model limits our ability to extrapolate to humans, where tissue healing is modulated by many factors. Conclusion: Our animal model provides evidence that ovarian hormone deprivation and POP surgery result in negative long-term effects on tissue function and extracellular matrix.

Patient experiences following prolapse surgery implementing a same-day discharge model: a prospective study.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Previous research has not evaluated patient experiences following vaginal reconstructive surgery using a same-day discharge model. The objective of this study was to describe patient experiences following major vaginal reconstructive surgery and same-day discharge. METHODS: In this descriptive study, patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with pelvic reconstruction were preoperatively enrolled. Questionnaires detailing experience with same-day discharge, surgical recovery, and advice for prospective patients were completed. Our primary outcome was question 7 of the Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire: Looking back, if you "had to do it all over again" would you have the surgery again? Descriptive statistics were performed, and correlations were performed with Spearman's rank test. RESULTS: Sixty patients were enrolled; 54 underwent surgery. Eighty-seven percent of patients completed the 12-week questionnaire. At 12 weeks, 96% of patients (n = 45) would have the surgery again, and 91% (n = 42) were satisfied with the results of surgery. Twelve weeks postoperatively, the most common patient-reported complications were urinary tract infection (n = 8, 17%), catheter concerns (n = 5, 11%), and constipation (n = 5, 11%). When asked to list the best parts of their surgical experience, half of patients felt that this was the office staff or physician themselves (n = 24, 51%). When asked what advice they would provide to future patients, the most common responses included having a support person at home and taking time for recovery. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of women receiving same-day discharge following vaginal hysterectomy with pelvic reconstruction, we present a unique insight into the most common patient concerns postoperatively. Rates of satisfaction and comfort were high.

[Radiological imaging following pelvic prolapse surgery]. / Bildgebung des postoperativen Beckenbodens.

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: Pelvic organ prolapse is a common condition in women, for which both conservative and surgical interventions are available. Knowledge of the different surgical procedures and the materials used is essential for adequate radiological diagnosis after prolapse surgery in order to differentiate potential complications from normal postoperative changes. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: In the immediate postoperative period, computed tomography (CT) is often the modality of choice for evaluating acute complications such as bleeding or organ injuries. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides excellent soft tissue contrast and is therefore generally preferred for assessing subacute and chronic complications. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Innovative techniques such as dynamic MRI protocols can improve the radiological assessment after prolapse surgery by enabling the evaluation of organ mobility. PERFORMANCE: Radiological standard procedures such as computed tomography (CT) and MRI provide detailed and reliable information about the postoperative site and potential complications following prolapse surgery. ACHIEVEMENTS: Radiological imaging plays an important role in the evaluation of patients after prolapse surgery, particularly when complications are suspected. Accurate radiological diagnosis can guide further appropriate therapeutic measures.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in posterior colporrhaphy does not reduce postoperative infection: a nationwide observational cohort study.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to explore if antibiotic prophylaxis prevents postoperative infection after a posterior colporrhaphy. METHODS: In this register-based nationwide cohort study data were collected from the "The Swedish National Quality Register of Gynecological Surgery" (GynOp). Women 18 years or older who underwent a primary posterior colporrhaphy between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2020 were included. Patients undergoing any concomitant prolapse procedure, mesh surgery, or incontinence procedure were excluded. The cohort was divided into two groups based on administration of antibiotic prophylaxis (n = 1,218) or not (n = 4,884). The primary outcome of this study was patient-reported infectious complication requiring antibiotic treatment. Secondary outcome measures included patient satisfaction and prolapse-related symptoms at 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 7,799 patients who underwent posterior colporrhaphy and met the inclusion criteria and did not meet the exclusion criteria were identified in the register database. Of these patients 6,102 answered the primary outcome question (79%). In the antibiotic prophylaxis group a total of 138 reported a postoperative infection (11%) and in the no antibiotic prophylaxis group the corresponding data were 520 (11%). There were no significant differences regarding either the primary or the secondary outcomes between the study groups. CONCLUSION: In this nationwide Swedish register study antibiotic prophylaxis was not associated with a reduced risk of postoperative infection after a posterior colporrhaphy.

The clinical utility of routine postoperative hemoglobin and creatinine after reconstructive surgery for apical pelvic organ prolapse.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Postoperative laboratory tests are routinely ordered after apical prolapse repair on asymptomatic patients. We hypothesize that routine serum hemoglobin (Hb) and creatinine (Cr) have limited clinical utility in the postoperative period in asymptomatic patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent surgical repair of apical prolapse between 2017 and 2019 at our institution. Subjects were divided into two groups postoperatively: symptomatic and asymptomatic anemia. Symptomatic patients were defined as having one or more of the following: blood pressure (BP) <90/60, heart rate (HR) >100, urine output <30 cc/h, subjective dizziness, flank pain, or abdominal pain. The primary aim was to evaluate the utility of postoperative serum Hb and Cr in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney tests analyzed categorical and continuous data respectively. A total of 325 patients were included. RESULTS: Patients with symptomatic anemia had a larger decrease in Hb on postoperative day 1 (POD1) with a mean decrease of -18.11% (± 6.64) compared with asymptomatic patients, who had a mean difference of -15.49% (± 5.63; p < 0.001). The total cost of tests evaluating Hb was US$61,745. Patients with symptomatic acute kidney injury had an increase in Cr on POD1 compared with asymptomatic patients, with a mean increase of 0.23% (± 16.06) and -3.07% (± 13.10) respectively (p < 0.05). The total cost of tests including Cr was US$131,812. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that routine postoperative Hb and Cr testing for apical prolapse should be reserved for symptomatic patients as it has minimal clinical value in asymptomatic patients and contributes to increased overall health care cost.

Rate of Postoperative Urinary Retention after Anterior Compartment Prolapse Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Early versus Conventional Transurethral Catheter Removal.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic organ prolapse is a common condition of pelvic floor dysfunction in women, especially in adult vaginally parous and elderly women. Because of its anatomy, the anterior compartment has a significant effect on urinary symptoms. Anterior colporrhaphy and colpocleisis are major anterior compartment prolapse-related surgeries. As we know, postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is one of the most common complications following pelvic floor surgery. To prevent this complication, indwelling bladder catheterization is routinely applied. In contrast, to minimize risk of infection and the patient's discomfort, the catheter should be removed as soon as possible. However, there is a lack of clarity regarding the optimal timing for catheter removal. Therefore, the aim of this trial is to compare the rate of POUR after anterior prolapse surgery between early transurethral catheter removal (24 h postoperatively) and our standard practice (on postoperative day 3). METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial among patients undergoing anterior compartment prolapse surgery between 2020 and 2021 at a university hospital. Women were randomized into two groups. After removal, if the second void residual urine volume exceeded 150 mL, POUR was diagnosed, and intermittent catheterization was performed. The primary outcome was the POUR rate. The secondary outcomes included urinary tract infection, asymptomatic bacteriuria, time to ambulation, time to spontaneous voiding, length of hospitalization, and patient satisfaction. Analysis was performed according to the intention to treat principle. The calculated sample size was 68 patients (34 patients in each group) for a 95% confidence interval, 80% power, 5% probability of type I error, and 10% data loss. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated that early catheter removal was comparable in POUR rate to conventional treatment with shorter hospitalization among patients undergoing anterior compartment prolapse surgery. Additionally, we observed no re-hospitalization owing to POUR. Therefore, early transurethral catheter removal is preferable following anterior compartment prolapse-related surgery.

Comparative anatomy of the ovine and human pelvis for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: evaluating the effectiveness of the ovine model.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) is a functional reconstructive surgery used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in middle-aged women. Although LSC is widely used, its implementation is hindered by perceived technical difficulties and surgical learning curves. Surgeons require adequate experience with LSC prior to performing the procedure on patients to improve their quality of life. This study is aimed at demonstrating the effectiveness of the ovine model (OM) for training and research in LSC, while also comparing anatomical differences between ovine and human models during the procedure. METHODS: The animal model and training were provided by the Jesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre. Urologists and gynecologists with experience in LSC participated in a course and their findings were recorded and documented. RESULTS: Differences in patient positioning, trocar placement, and reperitonealization were identified between the ovine and human models. Hysterectomy is always performed in the ovine model, whereas it is not mandatory in humans. There are also differences in the dissection of the levator ani muscle and attachment point of the posterior mesh to the uterus between the two models. Despite differences in some areas, the ovine pelvic structure and vagina are similar in size to those of humans. CONCLUSIONS: The ovine model is a valuable tool for surgeons in their learning curve for LSC, allowing for safe and effective practice prior to performing the procedure on patients. The use of the OM can help to improve the quality of life for women affected by pelvic organ prolapse.

Predicting the occurrence of stress urinary incontinence after prolapse surgery: a machine learning-based model.

Background: Previous prediction models for postoperative stress urinary incontinence (SUI) cannot be applied to patients receiving transvaginal mesh (TVM) surgery and colpocleisis or those with preoperative subject urinary incontinence. This study aimed to develop and validate a new machine learning model and compare it to previous models. Methods: Female patients who underwent prolapse surgeries for stage 2-4 anterior or apical prolapse between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019, at Peking Union Medical College Hospital were enrolled. Prolapse surgeries included native tissue repair, LeFort/colpocleisis, sacrocolpopexy, and TVM surgery. The existing models to predict postoperative SUI were externally validated. Subsequently, the dataset was randomly divided into 2 sets in a 4:1 ratio. The larger group was used to construct and internally validate models of logistic regression, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), which were then externally validated. The discrimination of the prediction models was evaluated using the area under the curve, while the calibration of the models was measured using the Spiegelhalter z test, mean absolute error (MSE), and calibration curves. Results: Overall, 555 patients were enrolled, and 116 experienced SUI 1 year postoperatively. Previous logistic models had poor performance, with areas under the curve of 0.544 and 0.586. In the model construction, the areas under the curve were 0.595, 0.842, and 0.714 for the logistic, random forest, and XGBoost models, respectively. However, only the XGBoost model exhibited good discrimination and calibration for both internal and external validations. Body mass index (BMI), C point of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) quantification stage, age, Aa point of POP quantification stage, and TVM surgery were the 5 most important predictors of postoperative SUI in the XGBoost model. Conclusions: Previous models had poor discrimination and calibration among a Chinese population. Hence, we developed and validated an XGBoost model, which performed well irrespective of the preoperative subjective urinary incontinence (preUI) and surgical methods. Further validation is still required.

Changes in sexual function over 12 months after native-tissue vaginal pelvic organ prolapse surgery with and without hysterectomy.

Background: There is a need to determine how preoperative sexual activity, uterine preservation, and hysterectomy affect sexual function after pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Aim: (1) To determine changes in sexual function in women, stratified by preoperative sexual activity status, after native-tissue pelvic organ prolapse surgery. (2) To examine the impact of hysterectomy and uterine preservation on sexual function. (3) To determine predictors for postoperative dyspareunia. Methods: This was a planned secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study. Sexual function was evaluated preoperatively and 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Sexual function was compared between those who had a hysterectomy and those who had uterine-preserving prolapse surgery. A logistic regression analysis was performed to assess predictors for dyspareunia. Outcomes: Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire. Results: At 12 months, 59 patients underwent surgery and were followed up (hysterectomy [n = 28, 47.5%] vs no hysterectomy [n = 31, 52.5%]; sexually active [n = 26, 44.1%] vs non-sexually active [n = 33, 55.9%]). Of those who did not undergo a hysterectomy, 17 (54.8%) had a uterine-preserving procedure. At 12 months, sexually active patients had significant improvement in sexual function (mean ± SD, 0.37 ± 0.43; P = .005), while non-sexually active patients reported significant improvement in satisfaction of sex life (P = .04) and not feeling sexually inferior (P = .003) or angry (P = .03) because of prolapse. No variables were associated with dyspareunia on bivariate analysis. Clinical Implications: It did not appear that either uterine preservation or hysterectomy had any impact on sexual function. There was a 10% increase in people who were sexually active after surgery. Strengths and Limitations: The major strength of our study is the use of a condition-specific validated questionnaire intended for sexually active and non-sexually active women. We interpreted our results utilizing a validated minimal clinically important difference score to provide interpretation of our results with statistical and clinical significance. The limitation of our study is that it was a secondary analysis that was not powered for these specific outcomes. Conclusion: At 12 months, for patients who were sexually active preoperatively, there was a clinically meaningful improvement in sexual function after native-tissue pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Non-sexually active women reported improvement in satisfaction of sex life. There was no difference in the sexual function of patients undergoing uterine preservation or posthysterectomy colpopexy when compared with those with concurrent hysterectomy, though this sample size was small.