Management of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome in Australia and New Zealand (SAGE-ANZ): An observational study.

Objective: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with significant mortality, morbidity, and cost. We aimed to describe characteristics and management of adult patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia and New Zealand with moderate-severe ARDS, to better understand contemporary practice. Design: Bi-national, prospective, observational, multi-centre study. Setting: 19 ICUs in Australia and New Zealand. Participants: Mechanically ventilated patients with moderate-severe ARDS. Main outcome measures: Baseline demographic characteristics, ventilation characteristics, use of adjunctive support therapy and all-cause mortality to day 28. Data were summarised using descriptive statistics. Results: 200 participants were enrolled, mean (±SD) age 55.5 (±15.9) years, 40% (n = 80) female. Around half (51.5%) had no baseline comorbidities and 45 (31%) tested positive for COVID-19. On day 1, mean SOFA score was 9 ± 3; median (IQR) PaO2/FiO2 ratio 119 (89, 142), median (IQR) FiO2 70% (50%, 99%) and mean (±SD) positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) 11 (±3) cmH2O. On day one, 10.5% (n = 21) received lung protective ventilation (LPV) (tidal volume ≤6.5 mL/kg predicted body weight and plateau pressure or peak pressure ≤30 cm H2O). Adjunctive therapies were received by 86% (n = 172) of patients at some stage from enrolment to day 28. Systemic steroids were most used (n = 127) followed by neuromuscular blockers (n = 122) and prone positioning (n = 27). Median ventilator-free days (IQR) to day 28 was 5 (0, 20). In-hospital mortality, censored at day 28, was 30.5% (n = 61). Conclusions: In Australia and New Zealand, compliance with evidence-based practices including LPV and prone positioning was low in this cohort. Therapies with proven benefit in the treatment of patients with moderate-severe ARDS, such as lung protective ventilation and prone positioning, were not routinely employed.

Effectiveness and safety of adjunctive non-drug measures in improving respiratory symptoms among patients with severe COVID-19: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection posed a huge threat and burden to public healthcare in late 2022. Non-drug measures of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), such as acupuncture, cupping and moxibustion, are commonly used as adjuncts in China to help in severe cases, but their effects remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: To observe the clinical effect of TCM non-drug measures in improving respiratory function and symptoms among patients with severe COVID-19. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: This study was designed as a multicenter, assessor-blind, randomized controlled trial. Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were randomly assigned to the treatment or control group. The treatment group received individualized TCM non-drug measures in combination with prone position ventilation, while the control group received prone position ventilation only for 5 consecutive days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were the percentage of patients with improved oxygen saturation (SpO2) at the end of the 5-day intervention, as well as changes of patients' respiratory rates. The secondary outcome measures included changes in SpO2 and total score on the self-made respiratory symptom scale. The improvement rate, defined as a 3-day consecutive increase in SpO2, the duration of prone positioning, and adverse events were recorded as well. RESULTS: Among the 198 patients included in the intention-to-treat analysis, 159 (80.3%) completed all assessments on day 5, and 39 (19.7%) patients withdrew from the study. At the end of the intervention, 71 (91%) patients in the treatment group had SpO2 above 93%, while 61 (75.3%) in the control group reached this level. The proportion of participant with improved SpO2 was significantly greater in the intervention group (mean difference [MD] = 15.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.4, 27.1; P = 0.008). Compared to the baseline, with daily treatment there were significant daily decreases in respiratory rates in both groups, but no statistical differences between groups were found (all P ≥ 0.05). Compared to the control group, the respiratory-related symptoms score was lower among patients in the treatment group (MD = -1.7; 95%CI: -2.8, -0.5; P = 0.008) after day 3 of treatment. A gradual decrease in the total scores of both groups was also observed. Thirty-one adverse events occurred during the intervention, and 2 patients were transferred to the intensive care unit due to deterioration of their illness. CONCLUSION: TCM non-drug measures combined with prone positioning can effectively treat patients with severe COVID-19. The combined therapy significantly increased SpO2 and improved symptom scores compared to prone positioning alone, thus improving the patients' respiratory function to help them recover. However, the improvement rate did not differ between the two groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300068319). Please cite this article as: Yin X, Jin Z, Li F, Huang L, Hu YM, Zhu BC, Wang ZQ, Li XY, Li JP, Lao LX, Mi YQ, Xu SF. Effectiveness and safety of adjunctive non-drug measures in improving respiratory symptoms among patients with severe COVID-19: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Integr Med. 2024; Epub ahead of print.

Complications associated with prone positioning in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients: A multicentre, retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Prone positioning is commonly applied to improve gas exchange in mechanically ventilated patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Whilst prone positioning is effective, specific complications may arise. We aimed to assess the prevalence of specific complications related to prone positioning in patients mechanically ventilated for COVID-19-related ARDS. DESIGN: Multicentre, retrospective observational study. METHODS: Multi-centre observational study of mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19-related ARDS admitted to intensive care units in Melbourne, Australia, from August to November 2021. Data on baseline characteristics, prone positioning, complications, and patient outcomes were collected. RESULTS: We assessed 553 prone episodes in 220 patients across seven sites (mean ± standard deviation age: 54 ± 13 years, 61% male). Overall, 58% (127/220) of patients experienced at least one prone-positioning-related complication. Pressure injury was the most prevalent (n = 92/220, 42%) complication reported. Factors associated with increased risk of pressure injury were male sex (adjusted odds ratio = 1.15, 95% confidence interval: [1.02-1.31]) and the total number of prone episodes (adjusted odds ratio = 1.11, 95% confidence interval: [1.07-1.15]). Device dislodgement was the next most common complication, occurring in 28 of 220 (13%) patients. There were no nerve or retinal injuries reported. CONCLUSIONS: Pressure injuries and line dislodgement were the most prevalent complications associated with prone positioning of patients mechanically ventilated for COVID-19. The risk of pressure injuries was associated with male sex and the number of prone positioning episodes.

Interventional study of comparing body pressure in different prone positions in healthy young women.

[Purpose] Although prone positioning is used to increase oxygenation in various respiratory conditions, this positioning can lead to facial and limb pressure ulcers. The aim in this study was to investigate body pressure variations in the prone position for different facial orientations and upper extremity positions. [Participants and Methods] Nineteen healthy young women participated in this study. Body pressure (maximum body pressure on the face, chest, elbows, and knees) was measured in six different prone positions with different face orientations and upper extremity positions, and the median value of each body pressure measurement was compared among postures. [Results] Face pressure tended to decrease when face orientation coincided with the raised side of the upper limb. In contrast, elbow pressure tended to be lower when the orientation of the face did not coincide with that of the raised side of the upper limb. [Conclusion] Pressure on the face and elbows can be reduced by placing the upper limbs in the prone position. This suggests that targeted and specific positioning may be useful for limiting the incidence and severity of pressure ulcers in these areas.

Prone positioning ventilation treatment rescuing a patient with chlamydia abortus-induced ARDS diagnosed by next generation sequencing: a case report.

Background: Chlamydia abortus is a pathogen capable of infecting both humans and animals. In most known cases, this pathogen primarily infects pregnant women, leading to miscarriage and preterm birth. However, it is exceedingly rare for this pathogen to cause pneumonia that progresses to severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Case introduction: We present a case of a 76-year-old male patient who was clinically diagnosed with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) caused by Chlamydia abortus and successfully treated. The patient's condition rapidly deteriorated over six days, evolving from a lung infection to severe pneumonia, ultimately leading to ARDS and sepsis. Initially, he was admitted to a local hospital for a lung infection where routine etiological examinations failed to identify any significant pathogens, and he received only empirical antimicrobial therapy. However, the lung infection was not controlled, and the patient's condition rapidly worsened, resulting in severe respiratory distress. This necessitated tracheal intubation and assisted ventilation, after which he was transferred to our hospital for treatment. Due to the patient's family's inability to afford the cost of ECMO treatment, we adopted a prone positioning ventilation strategy to improve the patient's ventilation-perfusion matching. Additionally, we performed metagenomic next-generation sequencing on the patient's bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, which confirmed the infection with Chlamydia abortus. These measures ultimately led to the successful treatment of the patient. Conclusion: Chlamydia abortus infection can lead to severe ARDS, necessitating timely diagnosis and active intervention by clinicians. This case highlights the crucial role of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in diagnosing rare pathogens. Timely adoption of prone positioning ventilation can significantly improve ventilation-perfusion matching, effectively treating ARDS caused by Chlamydia abortus. Additionally, the combination of moxifloxacin and piperacillin-tazobactam can treat ARDS caused by Chlamydia abortus.

Effect of Extended Prone Positioning in Intubated COVID-19 Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, a Revision Letter.

The systematic review and meta-analysis performed by Kang et al about the effect of extended prone positioning in intubated COVID-19 patients with ARDS presents valuable findings on the effectiveness and safety of extended prone positioning, but also raises several concerns which require clarifications. The inclusion of observational studies without any control group, the use of crude rather than adjusted estimates in key variables from observational studies, an error in data extraction from randomized clinical trials, and the employment of odds ratios rather than risk ratios, may mislead interpretations of the aforementioned intervention.

Prolonged vs shorter awake prone positioning for COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure: a multicenter, randomised controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Awake prone positioning has been reported to reduce endotracheal intubation in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). However, it is still unclear whether using the awake prone positioning for longer periods can further improve outcomes. METHODS: In this randomized, open-label clinical trial conducted at 12 hospitals in China, non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related AHRF were randomly assigned to prolonged awake prone positioning (target > 12 h daily for 7 days) or standard care with a shorter period of awake prone positioning. The primary outcome was endotracheal intubation within 28 days after randomization. The key secondary outcomes included mortality and adverse events. RESULTS: In total, 409 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to prolonged awake prone positioning (n = 205) or standard care (n = 204). In the first 7 days after randomization, the median duration of prone positioning was 12 h/d (interquartile range [IQR] 12-14 h/d) in the prolonged awake prone positioning group vs. 5 h/d (IQR 2-8 h/d) in the standard care group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, intubation occurred in 35 (17%) patients assigned to prolonged awake prone positioning and in 56 (27%) patients assigned to standard care (relative risk 0.62 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42-0.9]). The hazard ratio (HR) for intubation was 0.56 (0.37-0.86), and for mortality was 0.63 (0.42-0.96) for prolonged awake prone positioning versus standard care, within 28 days. The incidence of pre-specified adverse events was low and similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Prolonged awake prone positioning of patients with COVID-19-related AHRF reduces the intubation rate without significant harm. These results support prolonged awake prone positioning of patients with COVID-19-related AHRF.

Positive end-expiratory pressure management in patients with severe ARDS: implications of prone positioning and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

The optimal strategy for positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration in the management of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients remains unclear. Current guidelines emphasize the importance of a careful risk-benefit assessment for PEEP titration in terms of cardiopulmonary function in these patients. Over the last few decades, the primary goal of PEEP usage has shifted from merely improving oxygenation to emphasizing lung protection, with a growing focus on the individual pattern of lung injury, lung and chest wall mechanics, and the hemodynamic consequences of PEEP. In moderate-to-severe ARDS patients, prone positioning (PP) is recommended as part of a lung protective ventilation strategy to reduce mortality. However, the physiologic changes in respiratory mechanics and hemodynamics during PP may require careful re-assessment of the ventilation strategy, including PEEP. For the most severe ARDS patients with refractory gas exchange impairment, where lung protective ventilation is not possible, veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) facilitates gas exchange and allows for a "lung rest" strategy using "ultraprotective" ventilation. Consequently, the importance of lung recruitment to improve oxygenation and homogenize ventilation with adequate PEEP may differ in severe ARDS patients treated with V-V ECMO compared to those managed conservatively. This review discusses PEEP management in severe ARDS patients and the implications of management with PP or V-V ECMO with respect to respiratory mechanics and hemodynamic function.

Understanding the Physiological Connection: Cardiac Arrest Following Prone Positioning.

Prone positioning of patients is a routine occurrence in procedural suites and operating rooms (ORs). However, the physiological changes that occur with prone positioning are frequently underappreciated by proceduralists, surgeons, and anesthesiologists. This may be related to a sense of the routine or a lack of familiarity with physiological changes that accompany the prone position. The prone position, while aiding visualization and cannulation of the ampulla of Vater during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), can induce physiological changes such as reduced preload, inferior vena cava filling, and cardiac output; it can also increase intrathoracic pressure and mediastinal compression. Anesthetic agents can further impact cardiopulmonary physiology, decreasing systemic vascular resistance and reducing cardiac contractility. In addition, the transition from negative to positive pressure ventilation following endotracheal intubation can increase pulmonary artery pressures and right ventricular (RV) strain. Therefore, caution is needed with patients who have RV dysfunction, pulmonary hypertension, or preload dependency, as they may not tolerate prone positioning. We describe a case in which a 73-year-old male patient scheduled for an ERCP suffered cardiac arrest after being transitioned to the prone position. The patient was repositioned in the supine position and resuscitated. The case was completed in the supine position.

A Proof of Concept Study on the Comfort and Usability of a Supportive Pillow for Pregnant Patients with COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Background: The prone position has been seen to benefit patients experiencing acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, performing this position in pregnant patients has been difficult and raises safety concerns. Objective: The current study aimed to test the use of a supportive pillow (Prone Pillow for Pregnant Patients or 4P) to address concerns regarding pregnant patients in prone position. Methods: The study prospectively evaluated the use of the prone pillow for patient comfort and usability among healthcare workers with qualitative and quantitative measures. Results: A total of three patients were recruited alongside 16 healthcare workers assisting pregnant patients to the prone position. Overall, awake pregnant patients found the pillow to be comfortable while healthcare workers perceived the pillow to be useful in improving quality of care among awake and intubated pregnant patients. CONCLUSION: The 4P is a potentially useful and beneficial product in placing pregnant patients in the prone position during episodes of acute respiratory distress. However, due to the limited sample size, more clinical trials are needed to evaluate the impact of this innovation in improving patient and healthcare worker safety.

Adverse Events during Prone Positioning of Patients with COVID-19 during a Surge in Hospitalizations-Results of an Observational Study.

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of adverse events in mechanically ventilated adults with COVID-19 who have undergone prone positioning. A total of 100 patients were included retrospectively; 60% were males, the mean age was 64.8 ± 9.1 years, and hospital mortality was 47%. In all, we recorded 118 removals of catheters and tubes in 66 patients; 29.6% were removals of a nasogastric tube, 18.6% of an arterial line, 14.4% of a urinary catheter, and 12.7% of a central venous catheter. Reintubation or repositioning of a tracheotomy tube was required in 19 patients (16.1%), and cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 2 patients (1.7%). We recorded a total of 184 pressure ulcers in 79 patients (on anterior face in 38.5%, anterior thorax in 23.3% and any extremity anteriorly in 15.2%). We observed that body weight (p = 0.021; ß = 0.09 (CI95: 0.01-0.17)) and the cumulative duration of prone positioning (p = 0.005; ß = 0.06 (CI95: 0.02-0.11)) were independently associated with the occurrence of any adverse event. The use of prone positioning in our setting was associated with a greater number of adverse events than previously reported. Body weight and cumulative duration of prone positioning were associated with the occurrence of adverse events; however, other factors during a COVID-19 surge, such as working conditions, staffing, and staff education, could also have contributed to a high prevalence of adverse events.

Case report: Prone positioning in the improvement of severe post-operative hypoxia following aortic dissection.

Postoperative hypoxemia after aortic dissection surgery presents a considerable clinical challenge, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common etiology. Prone positioning treatment has emerged as a potential intervention for improving respiratory function in this context. We report the case of a 27-year-old male who developed severe hypoxemia complicated by pulmonary embolism after aortic dissection surgery. He was diagnosed with postoperative hypoxemia combined with pulmonary embolism following aortic dissection. His respiratory status continued to deteriorate despite receiving standard postoperative care, thereby necessitating an alternative approach. Implementation of prone positioning treatment led to a substantial amelioration in his oxygenation and overall respiratory health, with a consistent hemodynamic state observed throughout the treatment. This technique resulted in significant relief in symptoms and improvement in respiratory parameters, facilitating successful extubation and, ultimately, discharge. This case underlines the possible efficacy of prone positioning therapy in managing severe hypoxia complicated by pulmonary embolism following aortic dissection surgery, warranting more thorough research to explore the potential of this treatment modality.

Extended versus Standard Proning Duration for COVID-19-associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Target Trial Emulation Study.

Rationale: Prone positioning for ⩾16 hours in moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) improves survival. However, the optimal duration of proning is unknown. Objectives: To estimate the effect of extended versus standard proning duration on patients with moderate-to-severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) ARDS. Methods: Data were extracted from a five-hospital electronic medical record registry. Patients who were proned within 72 hours of mechanical ventilation were categorized as receiving extended (⩾24 h) versus standard (16-24 h) proning based on the first proning session length. We used a target trial emulation design to estimate the effect of extended versus standard proning on the primary outcome of 90-day mortality and secondary outcomes of ventilator liberation and intensive care unit (ICU) discharge. Analytically, we used inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) Cox or Fine-Gray regression models. Results: A total of 314 patients were included; 234 received extended proning, and 80 received standard-duration proning. Patients who received extended proning were older, had greater comorbidity, were more often at an academic hospital, and had shorter time from admission to mechanical ventilation. After IPTW, characteristics were well balanced. Unadjusted 90-day mortality in the extended versus standard proning groups was 39% versus 58%. In doubly robust IPTW analyses, we found no significant effects of extended versus standard proning duration on mortality (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.95 [0.51-1.77]), ventilator liberation (subdistribution hazard, 1.60 [0.97-2.64], or ICU discharge (subdistribution hazard, 1.31 [0.82-2.10]). Conclusions: Using target trial emulation, we found no significant effect of extended versus standard proning duration on mortality, ventilator liberation, or ICU discharge. However, given the imprecision of estimates, further study is justified.

A randomised clinical trial of awake prone positioning in COVID-19 suspects with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.

Background: Awake prone position (APP) has been reported to improve oxygenation in patients with COVID-19 disease and to reduce the requirement for invasive mechanical ventilation for patients requiring support with high flow nasal cannula. There is conflicting data for patients requiring lower-level oxygen support. Research question: Does APP reduce escalation of oxygen support in COVID-19 patients requiring supplementary oxygen?The primary outcome was defined as an escalation of oxygen support from simple supplementary oxygen (NP, HM, NRB) to NIV (CPAP or BiPAP), HFNC or IMV; OR from NIV (CPAP or BiPAP) or HFNC to IMV by day30. Study design: Two center, prospective, non-blind, randomised controlled trial. Patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 pneumonia requiring ≥ 5 liters/min oxygen to maintain saturations ≥ 94 % were randomised to either APP or control group. The APP group received a 3-h APP session three times per day for three days. Results: Between 9 May and July 13, 2021, 89 adults were screened and 61 enrolled, 31 to awake prone position and 30 controls. There was no difference in the primary outcome, 7 (22.6 %) patients randomised to APP and 9 (30.0 %) controls required escalation of oxygen support (OR 0.68 (0.22-2.14), P = 0.51). There were no differences in any secondary outcomes, in APP did not improve oxygenation. Interpretation: In COVID-19 patients, the use of APP did not prevent escalation of oxygen support from supplementary to invasive or non-invasive ventilation or improve patient respiratory physiology. Trial registration: NCT04853979 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Prone positioning does not improve outcomes of intubated patients with pneumocystis pneumonia and moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: a single-center, retrospective, observational, cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Pneumocystis pneumonia is an uncommon precipitant of acute respiratory distress syndrome and is associated with high mortality. Prone positioning ventilation has been proven to reduce mortality in patients with moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. We investigated the effect of prone positioning on oxygenation and mortality in intubated patients with pneumocystis pneumonia comorbid with moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. METHODS: In this single-center, retrospective, observational, cohort study, eligible patients were enrolled at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2021. Data on demographics, clinical features, ventilation parameters, arterial blood gas, and outcomes were collected. Patients were assigned to the prone cohort or supine cohort according to whether they received prone positioning ventilation. The main outcome was 28-day mortality. FINDINGS: A total of 79 patients were included in the study. Sixty-three patients were enrolled in the prone cohort, and 16 patients were enrolled in the supine cohort. The 28-day mortality was 61.9% in the prone cohort and 68.8% in the supine cohort (P = 0.26), and 90-day mortality was 66.7% in the prone cohort and 68.8% in the supine cohort (P = 0.55). Patients in the supine cohort had fewer invasive mechanical ventilation days and more ventilator-free days. The incidence of complications was higher in the prone cohort than in the supine cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with pneumocystis pneumonia and moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, prone positioning did not decrease 28-day or 90-day mortality. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov number, ChiCTR2200063889. Registered on 20 September 2022, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=174886 .

The usefulness of trans-splenic retrocardiac imaging in prone positioned critically ill patients.

In the last few years prone positioning has been used increasingly in the treatment of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and this maneuver is now considered a simple and safe method to improve oxygenation. Hemodynamic monitoring by echocardiography may be required but prone positioning imposes certain challenges limiting standard examination. The article describes the application of the "trans-splenic retrocardiac view," a little-known echographic window for obtaining Doppler parameters from the back in prone-positioned patients.

Effect of prone positioning ventilation on pulmonary function in neonates during venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Background: The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) technology has significantly decreased mortality rates associated with neonatal pulmonary hypertension and respiratory failure. Prone positioning ventilation (PPV) is a commonly used technique in critically ill infants, designed to improve thoracic pressure gradients, re-expand dorsal lung segments, and increase oxygenation in approximately 70-80% of patients suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of PPV on pulmonary function in neonates undergoing venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data from 17 neonates who received ECMO support in our institution, divided into two groups based on ventilation strategy: ECMO with PPV (ECMO-PPV, n=8) and ECMO with supine positioning ventilation (ECMO-SPV, n=9). Parameters such as the P/F ratio [arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2)], oxygenation index (OI), respiratory system compliance (Crs), and airway resistance (RAW) were collected and analyzed at baseline, and at 1, 2, and 3 days post-ECMO initiation. In the ECMO-PPV group, these parameters were also assessed 3 days pre-treatment and 2 hours post-treatment initiation. Results: Initial comparisons between ECMO-PPV and ECMO-SPV groups showed no significant difference in PaO2/FiO2, OI, Crs, or RAW. Throughout the ECMO treatment, both groups demonstrated gradual improvements in PaO2/FiO2 and Crs, and reductions in OI and RAW. Notably, by day 3, the ECMO-PPV group exhibited significant improvements in Crs and RAW compared to the ECMO-SPV group (P<0.05). Specifically, in the ECMO-PPV group, Crs significantly increased and RAW decreased after 2 hours of initiating PPV, with these changes becoming statistically significant by day 3 (Crs P=0.03, RAW P=0.03). No severe PPV-related complications were noted. Conclusions: PPV during neonatal ECMO may improve respiratory compliance and reduce RAW, potentially aiding lung recovery. Our findings suggest PPV as a viable strategy for neonates under ECMO support.

Effect of Extended Prone Positioning in Intubated COVID-19 Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY202390072.

Duration of the first prone positioning maneuver and its association with 90-day mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19: A retrospective study of time terciles.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between the duration of the first prone positioning maneuver (PPM) and 90-day mortality in patients with C-ARDS. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational, and analytical study. SETTING: COVID-19 ICU of a tertiary hospital. PATIENTS: Adults over 18 years old, with a confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 disease requiring PPM. INTERVENTIONS: Multivariable analysis of 90-day survival. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Duration of the first PPM, number of PPM sessions, 90-day mortality. RESULTS: 271 patients undergoing PPM were analyzed: first tertile (n = 111), second tertile (n = 95) and third tertile (n = 65). The results indicated that the median duration of PDP was 14 h (95% CI: 10-16 h) in the first tertile, 19 h (95% CI: 18-20 h) in the second tertile and 22 h (95% CI: 21-24 h) in the third tertile. Comparison of survival curves using the Logrank test did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.11). Cox Regression analysis showed an association between the number of pronation sessions (patients receiving between 2 and 5 sessions (HR = 2.19; 95% CI: 1.07-4.49); and those receiving more than 5 sessions (HR = 6.05; 95% CI: 2.78-13.16) and 90-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: while the duration of PDP does not appear to significantly influence 90-day mortality, the number of pronation sessions is identified as a significant factor associated with an increased risk of mortality.

[Pregnant women with COVID-19 ARDS on the intensive care unit]. / Die Schwangere mit COVID-19-ARDS auf der Intensivstation.

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are at increased risk of severe disease progression. Comorbidities, such as chronic arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, advanced maternal age and high body mass index, may predispose to severe disease. The management of pregnant COVID-19 patients on the intensive care unit (ICU) is challenging and requires careful consideration of maternal, fetal and ethical issues. OBJECTIVE: Description and discussion of intensive care treatment strategies and perinatal anesthesiological management in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed the demographic data, maternal medical history, clinical intensive care management, complications, indications and management of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and infant survival of all pregnant patients treated for severe CARDS in the anesthesiological ICU of a German university hospital between March and November 2021. RESULTS: The cohort included 9 patients with a mean age of 30.3 years (range 26-40 years). The gestational age ranged from 21 + 3 weeks to 37 + 2 weeks. None of the patients had been vaccinated against SARS-CoV­2. Of the nine patients seven were immigrants and communication was hampered by inadequate Central European language skills. Of the patients five had a PaO2/FiO2 index < 150 mm Hg despite escalated invasive ventilation (FiO2 > 0.9 and a positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] of 14 mbar) and were therefore treated with repeated prolonged prone positioning maneuvers (5-14 prone positions for 16 h each, a total of 47 prone positioning treatments) and 2 required treatment with inhaled nitric oxide and venovenous ECMO. The most common complications were bacterial superinfection of the lungs, urinary tract infection and delirium. All the women and five neonates survived. All newborns were delivered by cesarean section, two patients were discharged home with an intact pregnancy and two intrauterine fetal deaths were observed. None of the newborns tested positive for SARS-CoV­2 at birth. CONCLUSION: High survival rates are possible in pregnant patients with CARDS. The peripartum management of pregnant women with CARDS requires close interdisciplinary collaboration and should prioritize maternal survival in early pregnancy. In our experience, prolonged prone positioning, an essential evidence-based cornerstone in the treatment of ARDS, can also be safely used in advanced stages of pregnancy. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) and ECMO should be considered as life-saving treatment options for carefully selected patients. For cesarean section, neuraxial anesthesia can be safely performed in patients with mild CARDS if well planned but the therapeutic anticoagulation recommended for COVID-19 may increase the risk of bleeding complications, making general anesthesia a more viable alternative, especially in severe disease.