Exploring the Evolving Landscape of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) carries significant morbidity and mortality. Management of the HCC requires a multidisciplinary approach. Surgical resection and liver transplantation are the gold standard options for the appropriate settings. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a promising treatment modality in managing HCC; its use is more studied and well-established in advanced HCC (aHCC). Current clinical guidelines universally endorse SBRT as a viable alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA), transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE), and transarterial radioembolisation (TARE), a recommendation substantiated by literature demonstrating comparable efficacy among these modalities. In early-stage HCC, SBRT primarily manages unresectable tumours unsuitable for ablative procedures such as microwave ablation and RFA. SBRT has been incorporated as a modality to downstage tumours or as a bridge to transplant. In the case of intermediate or advanced HCC, SBRT offers excellent results either as a single modality or adjunct to other locoregional modalities such as TACE/TARE. Recent data from late-stage HCC patients illustrate the effectiveness of SBRT in achieving local tumour control while minimising damage to surrounding healthy liver tissue. It has promising local control of approximately 80-90% in managing HCC. Additional prospective data comparing the efficacy of SBRT with the first-line recommended therapies such as RFA, TACE, and surgery are essential. The standard of care for patients with advanced/metastatic disease is systemic therapy (immunotherapy/tyrosine kinase inhibitors). SBRT, in combination with immune-checkpoint inhibitors, has an immune-modulatory effect that results in a synergistic effect. Recent findings indicate that the combination of immunotherapy and SBRT in HCC is well-tolerated and exhibits synergistic effects. Further exploration of diverse immunotherapy and radiotherapy strategies is essential to identify the appropriate time for combination treatments and to optimise dose and fraction regimens. Prospective, randomised studies are imperative to establish SBRT as the primary treatment for HCC.

Setting the Stage: Feasibility and Baseline Characteristics in the PARTIQoL Trial Comparing Proton Therapy vs. IMRT for Localized Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: Men with localized prostate cancer may receive either photon-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or proton beam therapy (PBT). The XXXXX trial (NCT01617161), demonstrates the feasibility of performing a large, multicenter phase 3 randomized trial comparing IMRT to PBT for localized prostate cancer. Here, we report baseline features of patients enrolled on this trial and present strategies to improve feasibility of other similar trials. MATERIALS/METHODS: Patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer were randomized to either PBT or IMRT with stratification by institution, age, use of rectal spacer, and fractionation schedule (conventional fractionation: 79.2 Gy in 44 fractions vs. moderate hypofractionation: 70.0 Gy in 28 fractions). The primary endpoint is a change from baseline bowel health using the EPIC score 24 months after radiotherapy. Secondary objectives include treatment-related differences in urinary and erectile functions, adverse events, and efficacy endpoints. RESULTS: Between 07/2012 and 11/2021, 450 patients were successfully accrued. Patients were randomized to either PBT (N=226) or to IMRT (N=224); 13 were ineligible or withdrew prior to treatment. The median age of 437 analyzed patients was 68 years (range 46-89). 41% of patients had low-risk and 59% had intermediate-risk disease. 49% of patients were treated with conventional fractionation and 51% with moderately hypofractionation. For patients receiving PBT, 48% used a rectal balloon, 44% a rectal spacer, and 5% both. For patients receiving IMRT, 46% used a rectal balloon, 42% a rectal spacer, and 5% both. PBT and IMRT arms were balanced for baseline variables. CONCLUSIONS: Despite significant challenges, the XXXXX trial demonstrated that, with targeted recruitment approaches, multicenter collaboration, payer engagement, and protocol updates to incorporate contemporary techniques, it is feasible to perform a large phase III randomized clinical trial to assess whether PBT improves outcomes. We will separately report primary results and continue to monitor participants for longer followup and secondary endpoints.

PSMA PET/CT patterns of recurrence after mono-brachytherapy in men with low and intermediate prostate cancer and subsequent management.

PURPOSE: Brachytherapy as monotherapy is a recommended treatment option for men with low to intermediate risk prostate cancer. Local recurrence is difficult to identify. This study investigated PSMA PET/CT for recurrence after brachytherapy, as well as their subsequent management when recurrence occurred only within the prostate. METHODS: We performed a retrospective single-center analysis for patients who were treated with brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer from May 2002 to May 2021 and who underwent a PSMA PET/CT for BCR. We report the findings on PSMA PET/CT, quantitative parameters, as well as the later management of the patients. RESULTS: Forty patients were identified, who underwent PSMA PET/CT to investigate a rising PSA at a median (IQR) of 7 years (3.0-10.8) after initial therapy. Median (IQR) PSA at time of PSMA PET/CT was 6.54 ng/mL (3.9-15.5). On PSMA PET/CT, 20/40 (50%) men had prostate-only recurrence. Of the 20 patients with prostate-only recurrence, 8/20 (40%) had recurrence in a high-dose radiation zone, versus 7/20 (35%) in an under-covered zone. On PSMA PET/CT, recurrence within the prostate had median (IQR) SUVmax 10.4 (5.1-15.7) and volume 2.9 mL (2.0-11.2). Subsequent management of these patients with local recurrence included surveillance followed by ADT (9/20, 45%). For those with surveillance followed by ADT, the mean time before introduction of ADT was 4.1 years (range 1-8 years).

Volumetric modulated arc therapy total body irradiation improves toxicity outcomes compared to 2D total body irradiation.

Introduction: Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) total body irradiation (TBI) allows for greater organ sparing with improved target coverage compared to 2D-TBI. However, there is limited evidence of whether improved organ sparing translates to decreases in toxicities and how its toxicities compare to those of the 2D technique. We aimed to compare differences in toxicities among patients treated with TBI utilizing VMAT and 2D techniques. Methods/materials: A matched-pair single-institution retrospective analysis of 200 patients treated with TBI from 2014 to 2023 was performed. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank tests. Differences in characteristics and toxicities between the VMAT and 2D cohorts were compared using Fisher's exact test. Results: Of the 200 patients analyzed, 100 underwent VMAT-TBI, and 100 underwent 2D-TBI. The median age for VMAT-TBI and 2D-TBI patients was 13.7 years and 16.2 years, respectively (p = 0.25). In each cohort, 53 patients were treated with myeloablative regimens (8-13.76 Gy), and 47 were treated with non-myeloablative regimens (2-4 Gy). For the entire VMAT-TBI cohort, lung Dmean, kidney Dmean, and lens Dmax were spared to 60.6% ± 5.0%, 71.0% ± 8.5%, and 90.1% ± 3.5% of prescription, respectively. For the non-myeloablative VMAT-TBI cohort, testis/ovary Dmax, brain, and thyroid Dmean were spared to 33.4% ± 7.3%, 75.4% ± 7.0%, and 76.1% ± 10.5%, respectively. For 2D-TBI, lungs were spared using partial-transmission lung blocks for myeloablative regimens. The VMAT-TBI cohort experienced significantly lower rates of any grade of pneumonitis (2% vs. 12%), nephrotoxicity (7% vs. 34%), nausea (68% vs. 81%), skin (16% vs. 35%), and graft versus host disease (GVHD) (42% vs. 62%) compared to 2D-TBI patients. For myeloablative regimen patients, rates of pneumonitis (0% vs. 17%) and nephrotoxicity (9% vs. 36%) were significantly lower with VMAT-TBI versus 2D-TBI (p < 0.01). Median follow-up was 14.3 months, and neither median OS nor PFS for the entire cohort was reached. In the VMAT versus 2D-TBI cohort, the 1-year OS was 86.0% versus 83.0% (p = 0.26), and the 1-year PFS was 86.6% and 80.0% (p = 0.36), respectively. Conclusion: Normal tissue sparing with VMAT-TBI compared to the 2D-TBI translated to significantly lower rates of pneumonitis, renal toxicity, nausea, skin toxicity, and GVHD in patients, while maintaining excellent disease control.

Weekly Image Guidance in Patients With Cervical Cancer Treated With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy: Results of a Large Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Image guidance is recommended for patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for cervical cancer. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of a weekly image guidance pattern and analyzed the long-term outcomes in a large cohort of patients. METHODS: The study enrolled patients with Stage IB-IVA cervical cancer who received definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. IMRT was delivered at a dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions, with weekly cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Physicians advised patients on rectum and bladder preparation to help them prepare on nonimaging guidance days. When significant tumor regression was observed, a second computed tomography simulation and replanning were performed. RESULTS: The median follow-up periods were 63.4 months. The incidence rates of loco-regional and distant failure were 9.9% and 13.6%. The 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), loco-regional relapse-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 80.1%, 72.9%, 78.3%, and 74.8%, respectively. For patients with different stages, the 5-year OS, DFS, LRFS, and DMFS rates were statistically significant. For patients with and without positive regional lymph nodes, the 5-year OS, DFS, LRFS, and DMFS rates were 64.5% and 86.0%, 56.8% and 78.8%, 62.7% and 84.3%, and 58.8% and 81.0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that age, histology, tumor size, cancer stage, pretreatment squamous cell carcinoma antigen level, and para-aortic metastatic lymph nodes were independent prognostic factors of OS. Fifty-six (4.0%) patients experienced late Grade 3/4 chronic toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: IMRT with weekly CBCT is an acceptable image guidance strategy in countries with limited medical resources.

Neuropilin-2 expressing cells in breast cancer are S-nitrosylation hubs that mitigate radiation-induced oxidative stress.

The high rate of recurrence after radiation therapy in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) indicates that novel approaches and targets are needed to enhance radiosensitivity. Here, we report that neuropilin-2 (NRP2), a receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) that is enriched on sub-populations of TNBC cells with stem cell properties, is an effective therapeutic target for sensitizing TNBC to radiotherapy. Specifically, VEGF/NRP2 signaling induces nitric oxide synthase 2 (NOS2) transcription by a mechanism dependent on Gli1. NRP2-expressing tumor cells serve as a hub to produce nitric oxide (NO), an autocrine and paracrine signaling metabolite, which promotes cysteine-nitrosylation of Kelch-like ECH-asssociated protein 1 (KEAP1) and, consequently, nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NFE2L2)-mediated transcription of antioxidant response genes. Inhibiting VEGF binding to NRP2, using a humanized monoclonal antibody (mAb), results in NFE2L2 degradation via KEAP1 rendering cell lines and organoids vulnerable to irradiation. Importantly, treatment of patient-derived xenografts with the NRP2 mAb and radiation resulted in significant tumor necrosis and regression compared to radiation alone. Together, these findings reveal a targetable mechanism of radioresistance and they support the use of NRP2 mAb as an effective radiosensitizer in TNBC.

Early region-specific impact of adjuvant radiation therapy on cognition and quality of life in adult patients with primary brain tumors.

PURPOSE: While treatments for primary brain tumors increase survival, they have cognitive sequelae. Neurocognition's anatomical distribution makes it susceptible to brain damage. This study aims to evaluate the contribution of radiotherapy on short-term cognitive impairment. METHODS/PATIENTS: Using a prospective database of cognitive rehabilitation in adults operated on for primary brain tumors, a retrospective sub-analysis of the contribution of radiotherapy was performed. Thirty-four subdivisions of 12 neurocognitive regions were delineated in 48 irradiated patients and 30 non-irradiated patients. In the first group, the correlation between radiation dose and deterioration was evaluated. In all patients, the impact of tumor and surgical changes on dysfunction was calculated and compared with dose-dependent response. RESULTS: The correlation between cognitive status and radiation dose is especially strong and significant in the left hemisphere and in specific subdivisions such as the posterior hippocampus or the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, with the left prevailing over posterior dominance. Memory is the most affected domain 1 month after radiotherapy, as attention is three months later. The hippocampus is involved in various cognitive domains in addition to memory. The prefrontal subregions and the genu of the corpus callosum are more affected by the relationship with disease and surgical changes than by radiation exposure. Patients ongoing a course of radiotherapy do not benefit from concurrent cognitive rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: There is a correlation between the dose of radiation received by several encephalic regions and degree of short-term domain-specific cognition decline, considering other factors of risk and cognitive rehabilitation.

Is the IROC H&N credentialing phantom an effective surrogate for different anatomical sites?: Using IROC's H&N phantom for various sites.

PURPOSE: The IROC head and neck phantom is used to credential institutions for IMRT delivery for all anatomical sites where delivery of modulated therapy is a primary challenge. This study evaluated how appropriate the use of this phantom is for varied clinical anatomy by evaluating how closely the IROC head and neck phantom described clinical dose errors from beam modeling compared to various anatomical sites. METHODS: The MLC offset, transmission, PDD and seven additional beam modeling parameters for a Varian accelerator were modified in RayStation to match community data at the 2.5, 25, 50, 75 and 97.5 percentile levels. Modifications were evaluated on 25 H&N phantom cases and 25 clinical cases (H&N, prostate, lung, mesothelioma, and brain), generating 2,000 plan perturbations. Differences in mean dose delivered to clinical target volumes (CTV) and organs at risk (OAR) were compared between phantom and clinical plans to assess the relationship between dose deviations in phantom versus clinical CTVs, and as a function of 18 different complexity metrics. RESULTS: Perturbations to MLC offset and transmission parameters demonstrated the greatest impact on dose accuracy for phantom and clinical plans (for all anatomic sites). The phantom demonstrated equivalent or greater sensitivity to these parameter perturbations when compared to clinical sites, largely aligning with treatment complexity. The mean MLC Gap best described the impact of errors in TPS beam modeling parameters in phantoms plan and clinical plans from various anatomical sites. CONCLUSION: When compared across various anatomical sites, the IROC H&N credentialing phantom exhibited similar or greater sensitivity to errors in the treatment planning system. As such, it is a suitable surrogate device for assessing institutional performance across various anatomical sites. If an institution successfully irradiates the phantom, that result confers confidence that IMRT to a wide range of anatomical sites can be successfully delivered by the institution.

Overall survival and prognostic factors associated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with intraoperative radiation therapy in patients with advanced abdominopelvic malignancies: A single center retrospective analysis of 159 patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to look at the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and prognostic factors associated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) combined with intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT). METHODS: This study is a single center retrospective study performed on 159 patients who underwent treatment with CRS and HIPEC combined with IORT for abdominopelvic malignancies. OS and PFS were used to evaluate the efficacy of this treatment strategy amongst patients with abdominopelvic malignancies. RESULTS: The cohort's median age was 53 years, with a male predominance (58.5%). The median OS was not reached, but the mean OS was 76.87 months. In univariate analysis, several factors, including synchronous organ metastasis, Pathologic Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index (pPCI) ≥10, increased estimated blood loss, and severe postoperative complications, were associated with worse OS. However, multivariate analysis identified pPCI ≥ 10 as the sole independent predictor of worse OS. The 1- and 3-year survival rates were 83% and 70.4%, respectively. pPCI ≥ 10 and severe postoperative complications were significant predictors of worse survival outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Radical surgery alone is not enough, and CRS combined with HIPEC and IORT, when indicated, was proven to be safe and effective with no added morbidity or mortality.

Predictors of brain metastases in patients with oligometastatic solid tumours treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: In patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), those who develop brain metastases (BrM) may have poor outcomes. We aimed to investigate variables associated with BrM development in this population. METHODS: Patients with ≤ 5 extracranial metastases from solid tumors treated with SBRT from 2008 to 2016 at Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre were included. We investigated the association between covariates and CIBrM (cumulative incidence of BrM) using Fine-Gray analysis, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using Cox regression. We investigated the association between extracranial progression and CIBrM using time-based conditional analysis. RESULTS: Among 404 patients, the most common primary sites were lung, colorectal, prostate, breast and kidney. Median follow-up was 49 months. Median PFS was 25 months. Median OS was 70 months. 58 patients developed BrM, and 5-year CIBrM was 16%. On multivariable analysis, number of extracranial metastases, location of metastases, total planning target volume (PTV), and time from primary diagnosis to OMD were not associated with CIBrM, although several of these variables were associated with extracranial PFS and OS. Primary site was associated with CIBrM, with colorectal and prostate cancer associated with lower CIBrM compared to lung cancer. Widespread extracranial progression (≥ 5 sites) within 24, 36, 48 and 60 months of OMD diagnosis was independently associated with higher CIBrM. CONCLUSION: In patients with OMD treated with SBRT, baseline variables related to extracranial disease burden and distribution were not associated with BrM development, while primary site and widespread extracranial progression were associated with BrM development.

A Review of Neoadjuvant Therapy and the Watch-and-Wait Protocol in Rectal Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

The treatment of rectal cancer underwent a significant change with the introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME), which substantially improved recurrence rates. However, TME is associated with complications such as fecal incontinence and poor bladder control, especially in tumors located near the anal verge. The watch-and-wait (WW) protocol has emerged as an alternative for patients achieving a clinical complete response (cCR) following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. This narrative review, developed according to the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles guidelines, evaluates neoadjuvant treatments and the WW protocol for rectal cancer. Literature was sourced from the PubMed database using specific search terms related to neoadjuvant therapy and the WW protocol, resulting in 63 articles selected for discussion. Neoadjuvant treatment, including chemoradiation and short-course radiotherapy, is indicated for T3 and T4 rectal adenocarcinomas. Studies like the German Rectal Cancer Study Group and the PRODIGE 23 trial have shown the benefits of preoperative treatment, including improved disease-free survival and reduced local recurrence rates. However, challenges in adopting the WW protocol include the risk of local regrowth and distant metastasis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown promise in mismatch repair-deficient patients, yet the data are insufficient to fully endorse WW for these cases. The WW protocol is viable for selected rectal cancer patients, with ongoing debates regarding criteria for inclusion. Key challenges include accurately identifying cCR and managing patients with near-complete responses. MRI and endoscopic evaluation are crucial for assessing treatment response, although achieving a pathological complete response remains uncertain. The WW strategy offers a potential organ-preserving approach in rectal cancer management but requires careful patient selection and comprehensive risk-benefit discussions. Further research is needed to refine criteria for inclusion and optimize treatment protocols, enhancing outcomes while minimizing invasive interventions.

Spinal chordoma and chondrosarcoma treatment experiences - a 20-year retrospective study from databases of two medical centers.

The research retrospectively analyzed cases of spinal chordoma and chondrosarcoma involving patients who received treatment at the two hospitals between 2001 and 2023. Among the 48 patients studied (39 chordoma and 9 chondrosarcoma cases), the average age was 53.9 ± 15.8 years, with a range of 17 to 86 years. Out of these patients, 43 underwent excision surgery and were categorized based on tumor margin into negative (R0) or microscopically positive (R1) margin (n = 14) and macroscopically positive (R2) margin (n = 29) groups. The mean overall survival (OS) for R0/R1 and R2 groups was 156.5 ± 19.3 and 79.2 ± 11.9 months, respectively (p value = 0.012). The mean progression-free survival (PFS) for R0/R1 and R2 was 112.9 ± 24.4 and 25.5 ± 5.5 months (p value < 0.001). The study showed that regardless of whether patients in the R0/R1 or R2 groups received radiation therapy (RT) or not, there was no significant improvement in OS or PFS. Specifically, the OS and PFS for the RT only group were 75.9 ± 16.6 and 73.3 ± 18.0 months. In conclusion, the recommended treatment approach for spinal chordoma and chondrosarcoma remains en bloc resection surgery with an appropriate margin. Patients who are unsuitable for or decline surgery may find a beneficial disease control rate with traditional external beam photon/proton therapy.

Dosimetric comparison of gamma knife and linear accelerator (VMAT and IMRT) plans of SBRT of Lung tumours.

This study evaluates dosimetric differences in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for lung tumors using plans of Gamma Knife, and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) plans based on Linear Accelerator, aiming to inform the reader of appropriate treatment strategy selection. Ten patients with 23 lung tumor lesions treated with SBRT at Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University were analyzed. Plans of Gamma Knife, and VMAT, IMRT plans based on Linear Accelerator were created for each lesion, totaling 18 plans per type. Lesions were treated with 30-50 Gy in 5-10 fractions. Dosimetric parameters, including gradient index (GI), heterogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), and doses to the plan target volumes (PTVs), the gross tumor volumes (GTVs) and organs at risk (OARs) were compared. Plans of Gamma Knife showed superior HI and GI, higher PTV and GTV doses, and reduced doses to the ipsilateral and contralateral lungs, esophagus, spinal cord, and heart compared to VMAT and IMRT plans (p < 0.05). However, Plans of Gamma Knife required longer delivery times. When comparing VMAT and IMRT plans, VMAT plans had shorter delivery times than IMRT plans, but required more monitor units (MUs). Additionally, IMRT plans delivered a lower mean dose to the ipsilateral lung compared to VMAT plans. Gamma Knife SBRT plans achieves steeper dose falloff and minimizes radiation to normal lung tissue compared to VMAT and IMRT plans, but with longer delivery times. VMAT and IMRT plans displayed similar dose distributions for lung SBRT.

Head and Neck Paragangliomas: 16-year Single-center Experience and Mini Review on Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-up.

Objective: To investigate head and neck paraganglioma cases treated at a tertiary center from 2007 to 2023. The research includes a thorough examination of published studies that have focused on long-term outcomes. The additional goal is to contribute to the existing knowledge on head and neck paraganglioma, with a particular emphasis on refining diagnostic algorithms, treatment selection, and follow-up procedures. Methods: A total of 44 patients were retrospectively analyzed, and 39 were included. Demographic information, symptoms, radiological examination results, types, stages, and postoperative complications were recorded. A review was conducted to select articles that reported single-center experiences with large cohorts, long follow-ups, and different treatment modalities since 2010. Results: The mean age of the patients was 54 years, and the female/male ratio was 3.55:1. Among the 39 cases examined, 18 and 19 were identified as cervical paraganglioma and 19 as temporal bone paraganglioma. All patients initially underwent surgical resection. The mean follow-up duration was 5.42 years. Four residual cases and two recurrences were identified postoperatively, and a Gamma Knife was used as additional treatment. Subsequently, 17 articles were selected and summarized, and then a flowchart was prepared showing the possible options for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Conclusions: Preoperative staging is essential for surgical planning and predicting potential intraoperative complications. Based on our findings and review of the articles, we have prepared a flowchart that includes all possibilities depending on the tumor stage to help in the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of head and neck paragangliomas.

Postoperative irradiation in stage II thymomas: is it worth it?-shedding some light in the guidelines' gray zone.

Thymomas are rare, indolent tumors. Early stages (I-II) benefit from surgical treatment, while locally advanced diseases (stages III-IV) usually require a multidisciplinary approach. The role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) on anterior mediastinum for radically resected Masaoka-Koga stage II thymomas remains controversial. This study aims to determine the impact of PORT on the disease-free survival (DFS) of stage II thymomas. We retrospectively collected the clinical and oncologic data [age, sex, myasthenia gravis (MG) prevalence, Masaoka-Koga stage, World Health Organization (WHO) histologic subtype] of those patients who underwent radical exeresis in our Unit between January 2000 and December 2020. Kaplan-Meier estimates of DFS were then performed. Our study included 195 patients (M/F = 98/97). Almost all patients were affected by MG (90.7%) and most of them were operated by median sternotomy (93.3%). Thymoma stage was IIa in 87 cases (44.6%) and IIb in 108 cases (55.4%). The most represented histologic subtype was AB (27.7%), followed by B2 (24.6%), A (19%), B1 (14.9%) and B3 (13.8%). PORT was performed in 113 patients (58%, 39 stage IIa and 74 stage IIb). During the surveillance, 8 patients (4.1%) presented pleural recurrences and no local relapses. DFS was comparable in stage IIa and IIb patients, independently from PORT administration (p = .395 and p = .858, respectively). Moreover, PORT did not affect DFS considering the histologic subtypes (p = .304 for A and AB thymomas, p = .608 for B1, B2 and B3 thymomas). In our wide series, PORT administration didn't show any additional benefit on DFS. Therefore, based on our experience, patients with stage II thymoma who underwent radical surgery should not undergo any local adjuvant treatment.

Return to work in younger patients with brain metastases who survived for 2 years or more.

PURPOSE: The study's purpose was to analyze return to work and other long-term outcomes in younger patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases, treated before they reached legal retirement age, i.e. younger than 65 years. METHODS: We included patients who survived greater than 2 years after their first treatment, regardless of approach (systemic therapy, neurosurgical resection, whole-brain or stereotactic radiotherapy). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who worked 2 years after their initial treatment for brain metastases. Outcomes beyond the 2-year cut-off were also abstracted from comprehensive electronic health records, throughout the follow-up period. RESULTS: Of 455 patients who received active therapy for brain metastases, 62 (14%) survived for > 2 years. Twenty-eight were younger than 65 years. The actuarial median survival was 81 months and the 5-year survival rate 53%. For patients alive after 5 years, the 10-year survival rate was 54%. At diagnosis, 25% of patients (7 of 28) were permanently incapacitated for work/retired. Of the remaining 21 patients, 33% did work 2 years later. However, several of these patients went on to receive disability pension afterwards. Eventually, 19% continued working in the longer run. Younger age, absence of extracranial metastases, presence of a single brain metastasis, and Karnofsky performance status 90-100 were common features of patients who worked after 2 years. CONCLUSION: Long-term survival was achieved after vastly different therapeutic approaches, regarding both upfront and sequential management. Many patients required three or more lines of brain-directed treatment. Few patients continued working in the longer run.

Expression of Types I and III Collagens and Ultrastructure of the Extracellular Matrix in Rectal Adenocarcinoma of Different Differentiation Degree after Neoadjuvant Radiation Therapy.

The structural organization of the extracellular matrix of rectal adenocarcinoma of different differentiation degrees without and after neoadjuvant radiation therapy was studied on postoperative material using immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy. The differences in the expression of types I and III collagens, as well as in the ultrastructural organization of the extracellular matrix of rectal adenocarcinoma of different differentiation degrees without and after neoadjuvant radiation therapy were revealed. We observed high expression of collagen I and wide channels in the collagen matrix in the central areas of the well differentiated adenocarcinomas without neoadjuvant radiation therapy and in poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas after neoadjuvant radiation therapy, which can be associated with metastasis and poor prognosis for the patients.

New frontiers in radioembolization.

Radioembolization is a locoregional transarterial therapy that combines radionuclide and micron-sized beads to deliver radiation internally to the target tumors based on the arterial blood flow. While initially developed as a palliative treatment option, radioembolization is now used for curative intent treatment, neoadjuvant therapy, and method to downstage or bridge for liver transplant. Radioembolization has become increasingly utilized and is an important therapeutic option for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastasis. This article provides an overview of the techniques, challenges, and novel developments in radioembolization, including new dosimetry techniques, radionuclides, and new target tumors.

Adaptive Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in the Management of Oligometastatic Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: A Clinical Case Report.

Safe delivery of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to large (>5 cm) oligometastatic abdominopelvic tumors can often be challenging, especially in tumors that require a higher biologically effective dose (BED) for tumor control. Adaptive stereotactic body radiation therapy (A-SBRT) involves inter-fraction and real-time replanning while the patient is on the treatment table, potentially allowing for improved dose coverage and greater sparing of critical structures. Our case report illustrates the benefit of CT-based A-SBRT in the treatment and management of an oligometastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma patient with a rapidly enlarging pelvic recurrence. A 60-year-old female presented to the radiation oncology clinic for treatment of an enlarging, right pelvic oligometastatic leiomyosarcoma. She was prescribed 35 Gy in five fractions. Planning prioritized the sparing of nearby small bowels while maximizing coverage of the planning target volume (PTV). On treatment day, two plans were calculated, the initial plan recalculated on the current CBCT (scheduled plan) and a plan reoptimized using current contours (adapted plan), and the more appropriate one was chosen for delivery. The adapted plan was chosen for all five fractions, with the adapted plan offering better small bowel sparing in five fractions and better target coverage in four fractions, delivering a total of 34 Gy to 95% of the PTV while limiting the small bowel to a maximum point dose of 37 Gy. At approximately six months out from treatment, the patient showed continued radiographic response and resolved acute Grade 1 gastrointestinal toxicity. This case study therefore demonstrates the successful treatment of a large oligometastatic abdominopelvic tumor using CT-based A-SBRT and builds on previous experience treating abdominal cases adaptively.

Reirradiation of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with external photons: A practical review of the literature.

The modalities of management by reirradiation for recurrence or a second localization of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) in previously irradiated terrain is challenging due to the great heterogeneity of data in the literature, mainly retrospective data reporting non-negligible risks of serious late toxicity events. With the recent development of more precise and conformal radiotherapy techniques such as intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT), the benefit-to-risk ratio of reirradiation has evolved in recent years with encouraging results, but patient selection is crucial. The aim of this review is to discuss the role of HNSCC reirradiation in terms of patient selection and external photon radiotherapy techniques for definitive tumor reirradiation and postoperative reirradiation.