The Broad Spectrum of Paediatric Pancreatic Disease: A Single-center 26-years Retrospective Review.

BACKGROUND: Paediatric pancreatic pathology and its management is rarely described. We present our experience. METHODS: A retrospective case-note review of all patients with pancreatic disease from 1995 to 2021 was completed. Data are quoted as median (range). RESULTS: Two hundred and twelve patients were identified with 75.9% presenting with pancreatitis. Referrals for pancreatitis increased during the study period and affected a wide age range (2 months-15.6 years). Acute pancreatitis (n = 118) (age 10.6 (0.18-16.3) years). The most common causes were idiopathic (n = 60, 50.8%) and biliary (n = 28, 23.8%). About 10% required treatment for complications or underlying biliary causes. Recurrent pancreatitis (n = 14) (11.6 (0.3-14.3) years). The most common cause was hereditary pancreatitis (n = 6, 42.9%). One patient required endoscopic drainage of pseudocyst. Chronic pancreatitis (n = 29) (16 (0.38-15.5) years). The underlying diagnosis was idiopathic (n = 14, 48.4%) or hereditary pancreatitis (n = 10, 34.5%). 13 patients required active management, including pancreaticojejunostomies (n = 5). Blunt Trauma (n = 34) was managed conservatively in 24 (70.5%). 6 patients required open surgery, but 4 were managed by either endoscopy or interventional radiology. Pancreatic tumours (n = 13) presented at 11.2 (2.3-16) years. Pathology included pancreaticoblastomas (n = 3), solid pseudopapillary tumours (n = 3), neuroendocrine tumours (n = 2), acinar cell cystadenoma (n = 1), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (n = 1), pancreatic insulinoma (n = 1), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (n = 1), and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 1). OTHERS (N = 4): Pancreatic cyst (n = 3) and annular pancreas (n = 1). CONCLUSION: Paediatric pancreatic disease spans a wide spectrum of both benign and malignant disease and benefits from access to specialist medical, surgical, endoscopic, and interventional radiology expertise. Referrals for paediatric pancreatitis are increasing, but aetiology is different to that seen in adults. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Referral Patterns to Pediatric Rheumatology From Primary Care Physicians and General Pediatrics at a Single Pediatric Rheumatology Center in Saudi Arabia.

Objective This study aims to investigate referral patterns to pediatric rheumatology and assess the correctness of referrals from primary care physicians and pediatric specialties. Methodology A cross-sectional, retrospective study was conducted on all patients who were referred to the Pediatric Rheumatology Department since 2015 (N = 282) at King Abdullah Specialized Children's Hospital (KASCH), Pediatric Rheumatology Clinic. Age, gender, reason for referral, clinical features, referring department, and final diagnosis were taken as variables. Data were collected through the documents and records of the cases (referrals) in the electronic medical records system of the hospital (BestCare). Then Excel was used for data entry, and JMP statistical software, version 14.0.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for data analysis. Results In a total of 282 patients across the Pediatric Rheumatology Clinic, KASCH, the most common reason for referral to the clinic was joint pain (112, 43%) and the least common reason was rash (6, 2.3%). The most common diagnosis was juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) (24, 26.6%). The majority of patients referred to the rheumatology department did not have a rheumatological disease (169, 65%). The majority of the referrals were from pediatrics subspecialties (168, 65%). The least referred department was primary care ( 21, 8%). Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first study showing the referral pattern, accuracy, and profile of a pediatric rheumatology clinic population in Saudi Arabia. Expectedly, the most common reason for referral was arthralgia. The most common diagnosis was JIA. According to the results, most of the referrals were inaccurate as they did not end up with a rheumatological diagnosis. Pediatric subspecialties should be more aware of the nature of rheumatological disease to avoid over-referrals. Finding a pattern of referrals to pediatric rheumatology is an excellent modality to accomplish early diagnosis and the best possible prognosis.

New Patient Referral Patterns May Reflect Gender Biases in Orthopedics.

Background Orthopedic surgery traditionally has been a male-dominant specialty with the lowest percentage of female residents and female faculty of all medical specialties. Prior studies demonstrate gender biases from both referring providers and patients. This study investigates surgeon, referring provider, and patient demographic differences in new patient orthopedic referrals. Methodology A retrospective chart review was performed to analyze the demographics of new patients referred to male and female orthopedic surgeons within adult reconstruction and shoulder/elbow specialties at a single academic institution. Patients and referring provider demographics were compared for male and female orthopedic surgeons. Statistical analysis utilized Student's t-test and chi-square analyses for quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. Results In total, 2,642 new patients were analyzed, with 2,084 patients being referred from a provider, and 306 patients requesting specific providers. When compared to male surgeons, female surgeons had fewer referrals from male providers (45.3% vs. 50.3%, p = 0.03) and no difference from female providers (30.6% vs, 29.9%, p = 0.72). The female adult reconstruction surgeon had fewer internal referrals compared to a male surgeon of similar experience and time at the institution (8.4% vs. 12.8%, p = 0.03). Female patients requested male surgeons more frequently than female surgeons (76.7% vs. 23.3%, p = 0.02). Conclusions New patient demographics differed between male and female orthopedic surgeons at a single academic institution with more male referring providers referring to male surgeons. Female patients requesting male orthopedic providers may reflect patient and specialty-driven biases. There remains a need for additional female representation in orthopedic surgery, and new patient referral patterns may be a marker to assess and monitor gender biases.

Outcomes of patients with respiratory failure declined for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a prospective observational study.

PURPOSE: Descriptive information on referral patterns and short-term outcomes of patients with respiratory failure declined for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is lacking. METHODS: We conducted a prospective single-centre observational cohort study of ECMO referrals to Toronto General Hospital (receiving hospital) for severe respiratory failure (COVID-19 and non-COVID-19), between 1 December 2019 and 30 November 2020. Data related to the referral, the referral decision, and reasons for refusal were collected. Reasons for refusal were grouped into three mutually exclusive categories selected a priori: "too sick now," "too sick before," and "not sick enough." In declined referrals, referring physicians were surveyed to collect patient outcome on day 7 after the referral. The primary study endpoints were referral outcome (accepted/declined) and patient outcome (alive/deceased). RESULTS: A total of 193 referrals were included; 73% were declined for transfer. Referral outcome was influenced by age (odds ratio [OR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95 to 0.96; P < 0.01) and involvement of other members of the ECMO team in the discussion (OR, 4.42; 95% CI, 1.28 to 15.2; P < 0.01). Patient outcomes were missing in 46 (24%) referrals (inability to locate the referring physician or the referring physician being unable to recall the outcome). Using available data (95 declined and 52 accepted referrals; n = 147), survival to day 7 was 49% for declined referrals (35% for patients deemed "too sick now," 53% for "too sick before," 100% for "not sick enough," and 50% for reason for refusal not reported) and 98% for transferred patients. Sensitivity analysis setting missing outcomes to directional extreme values retained robustness of survival probabilities. CONCLUSION: Nearly half of the patients declined for ECMO consideration were alive on day 7. More information on patient trajectory and long-term outcomes in declined referrals is needed to refine selection criteria.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: On manque d'informations descriptives sur les schémas de références et les devenirs à court terme des patient·es atteint·es d'insuffisance respiratoire n'ayant pas pu recevoir une oxygénation par membrane extracorporelle (ECMO). MéTHODE: Nous avons réalisé une étude de cohorte observationnelle prospective monocentrique sur les références vers l'ECMO à l'Hôpital général de Toronto (hôpital d'accueil) pour insuffisance respiratoire grave (COVID-19 et non-COVID-19), entre le 1er décembre 2019 et le 30 novembre 2020. Les données relatives à la référence, à la décision de référence et aux motifs du refus ont été recueillies. Les motifs de refus ont été regroupés en trois catégories mutuellement exclusives sélectionnées a priori : « Trop malade maintenant ¼, « Trop malade avant ¼ et « Pas assez malade ¼. En ce qui concerne les références refusées, un sondage envoyé aux médecins traitant·es avait pour objectif de recueillir les devenirs des patient·es le jour 7 suivant la référence. Les critères d'évaluation principaux de l'étude étaient le résultat de la référence (accepté/refusé) et le devenir des patient·es (vivant·e/décédé·e). RéSULTATS: Au total, 193 références ont été incluses; le transfert a été refusé dans 73 % des cas. L'acceptation ou le refus de la référence était influencé par l'âge (rapport de cotes [RC], 0,97; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 0,95 à 0,96; P < 0,01) et la participation d'autres membres de l'équipe ECMO à la discussion (RC, 4,42; IC 95 %, 1,28 à 15,2; P < 0,01). Les devenirs des patient·es étaient manquants pour 46 (24 %) des personnes référées (incapacité de localiser les médecins traitant·es ou incapacité des médecins de se souvenir du devenir). À l'aide des données disponibles (95 références refusées et 52 références acceptées; n = 147), la survie jusqu'au jour 7 était de 49 % pour les références refusées (35 % pour la patientèle jugée « trop malade maintenant ¼, 53 % pour celle « trop malade avant ¼, 100 % pour celle « pas assez malade ¼ et 50 % pour les cas où la raison du refus n'était pas déclarée) et 98 % pour les patient·es transféré·es. L'analyse de sensibilité établissant les résultats manquants à des valeurs extrêmes directionnelles a conservé la robustesse des probabilités de survie. CONCLUSION: Près de la moitié des patient·es pour lesquel·les un traitement sous ECMO a été refusé étaient en vie au jour 7. Davantage d'informations concernant la trajectoire et les devenirs à long terme des patient·es refusé·es sont nécessaires pour parfaire les critères de sélection.

Surgical decompressions for cauda equina syndrome during COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The novel coronarvirus disease (COVID-19) has had a major impact on provision of spinal neurosurgery across the world, especially in the UK, with a significant fall in operating and patient volumes, and elective clinical activities. It is unclear whether the pandemic has affected the volume of urgent spinal procedures in the UK, especially surgical decompressions for cauda equina syndrome (CES). METHODS: Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis of theatre records and electronic operation notes at our institution to identify all procedures performed for CES before (December 2019 to February 2020) and during (March 2020 to May 2020) the COVID-19 pandemic. Statistical analyses were performed on SPSS v22 (IBM). RESULTS: Forty-four patients underwent surgical decompressions during the study period. Over half (54.5%) were female and the median age was 45 years (range = 22-78 years). Three in four procedures were performed at L4-5 and L5-S1 levels (79.5%). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of decompressions performed each month [χ2(5)=1.818; p = 0.874]. On the other hand, the number of referrals for suspected or confirmed CES fell by 81.8% between December 2019 and April 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Our results did not show any statistically significant decline in the volume of surgical decompressions performed for CES despite the considerable fall in electronic referrals for CES and degenerative spinal conditions. This suggests that patients with critical neurological symptoms continued to present and were treated appropriately despite the restrictions imposed on spinal surgeons during the pandemic.

An appraisal of the referral system and outcome for obstetric patients referred to a tertiary centre.

The existing referral system from primary institutions to higher institutions within our health district for obstetric patients has not been subjected to any analysis of shortcomings. We therefore made an assessment of resultant adverse maternal, foetal and neonatal outcomes by a prospective observational cohort study done over a 6-month period at a tertiary centre. Data were collected from 317 patients. We found an important failure to identify high risk patients at primary institutions. This resulted in an increased overall adverse outcome five-fold, adverse maternal outcome seven-fold, adverse neonatal outcome six-fold and stillbirth four-fold. Ongoing training and use of updated guidelines are our urgent recommendations.

A new look into uveitis in Colombia: changes in distribution patterns and clinical characteristics over the last 25 years.

PURPOSE: To describe the distribution patterns and clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed with uveitis at a specialized uveitis center in Bogotá, Colombia, from 2013 to 2021 and compare these patterns with the previously reported between 1996 and 2006. METHODS: We performed an observational descriptive cross-sectional study systematically reviewing clinical records of patients attending between 2013 and 2021. Data were analyzed and compared with previous reports. RESULTS: Of the 489 patients with uveitis, 310 were females (63.4%). The mean age of onset was 38.7, with a range between 1 and 83 years. Bilateral (52.8%), anterior (45.8%), non-granulomatous (90.8%), and recurrent (47.6%) were the most common types of uveitis found in our population sample. The most common cause of uveitis in this study was idiopathic, followed by toxoplasmosis and HLA-B27 + associated uveitis, which differs from the previous Colombian study where ocular toxoplasmosis was the most frequent cause. This highlights a significant shift from infectious etiologies to more immune-mediated processes as the cause of uveitis in Colombia nowadays. CONCLUSION: The results of this study provide a comparison between the clinical patterns of presentation of uveitis from 1996 to 2006 and the patterns observed from 2013 to 2021, enhancing awareness about the changing dynamics of uveitis in Colombia to guide a better understanding of the diagnosis, classification, and correlation with other systemic conditions of the disease.

Profiles of the Patients and Their Referral Patterns Visiting the Psychiatry Clinic of a General Hospital Setting Located in a Mental Health Resource Deficient Region of India: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Objectives Treatment for mental health problems is determined by cultural, health infrastructure, and illness-related factors. Literature is sparse from India, particularly from the mental health resources-deficient regions of the country such as central India. Therefore, the current study is aimed at assessing the profile of the patients visiting the psychiatry outpatient facility (OPF) of a tertiary-care general hospital setting (GHS), their referral patterns, and their determinants. Materials and Methods A retrospective chart review of the newly registered individuals (October 2019 to March 2020) in the psychiatry OPF of the GHS from Central India was used in the study. Data (sociodemographic profiles, illness characteristics, and referral patterns) were extracted as per the standard guidelines. Statistical Analysis Descriptive statistics were used to represent sociodemographic, illness-, and past treatment-related characteristics of the participants. Chi-squared test was used to compare the referral characteristics of the two groups (self-referred patients vs. those referred by others, dependent variable) with regard to characteristics of the patients (independent variables). Results A total of 418 individuals were registered in the clinic. Most individuals suffered from the neurotic, stress-related, and somatoform group of disorders ( n = 231, 39.5%). More than halves were self-referred; most were referred from the internal medicine and allied departments. Being male, having at least graduate degree (χ 2 df(1) = 4.25 to 6.79, p < 0.05), suffering from organic mental-, psychotic-, and recurrent affective-disorders, and positive family history (χ 2 df(1) = 4.91 to 21.76, p < 0.05 to <0.001) along with first treatment attempt or previous treatment from the traditional healers, and absence of co-occurring medical illness were associated with self-referral (vs. referred by others) (χ 2 df(1) = 4.64 to 17.6, p < 0.05 to <0.001). Conclusions GHS has a characteristic referral pattern. The referral patterns of the patients for various psychiatric problems are determined by their sociodemographic, illness, and cultural characteristics; particularly, poor mental health literacy (among the patients-caregivers), stigma related to mental disorders, and unavailability of the mental health services act as major determinants. Sensitizing the patients-caregivers and health-care professionals concerning this could facilitate an early engagement with the psychiatric treatment. Future research needs to explore this phenomenon in greater detail, maybe by qualitative methods.

Use of an Online Referral Service for Acute Neurosurgical Referrals: An Institutional Experience.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to review the current scope of emergency neurosurgical referrals and examine the long-term use of a web-based referral system. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective observational study. Referral information was collected retrospectively over a 1-year period after the implementation of a web-based referral system (June 2019-June 2020). Information such as demographics, clinical information, referrer details, and neurosurgical response times and outcomes were collected. Statistical analyses were performed using R Version 6.3.1. RESULTS: Our unit received 5949 referrals with a median age of 63 years old (range: 0-107 years) (male = 50.3%). We observed an average of 16.3 referrals per day (range: 4-32), with Fridays having the highest average and the weekend days receiving statistically fewer referrals (P < 0.001). More than a third (35.9%) of referrals occurred within hours (8:00-17:00 Monday-Friday), with A + E making up approximately 50% of referrals. Common reasons for referral were traumatic brain injury, intracranial tumors, and degenerative spine. The median time from referral to first response was 32 minutes, occurring within an hour in 72.9% of cases. The median time to definite response was 83 minutes, occurring within 2 hours in 58.2% of cases. Factors found to impact the response time were referral emergency and time of day. Our acceptance rate over this period was 18.5%. CONCLUSIONS: With an increasing number of referrals, it is feasible to provide traceable advice in a timely manner through an electronic web-based referral system transferable to any specialty. Insights could be used to direct resources and workforce planning according to emergency referral patterns.

Adrenal Incidentaloma: Prevalence and Referral Patterns From Routine Practice in a Large UK University Teaching Hospital.

CONTEXT: Adrenal incidentalomas (AIs) are increasingly being identified during unrelated imaging. Unlike AI clinical management, data on referral patterns in routine practice are lacking. OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to identify factors associated with AI referral. METHODS: We linked data from imaging reports and outpatient bookings from a large UK teaching hospital. We examined (i) AI prevalence and (ii) pattern of referral to endocrinology, stratified by age, imaging modality, scan anatomical site, requesting clinical specialty, and temporal trends. Using key radiology phrases to identify scans reporting potential AI, we identified 4097 individuals from 479 945 scan reports (2015-2019). Main outcome measures included prevalence of AI and referral rates. RESULTS: Overall, AI lesions were identified in 1.2% of scans. They were more prevalent in abdomen computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans (3.0% and 0.6%, respectively). Scans performed increased 7.7% year-on-year from 2015 to 2019, with a more pronounced increase in the number with AI lesions (14.7% per year).Only 394 of 4097 patients (9.6%) had a documented endocrinology referral code within 90 days, with medical (11.8%) more likely to refer than surgical (7.2%) specialties (P < .001). Despite prevalence increasing with age, older patients were less likely to be referred (P < .001). CONCLUSION: While overall AI prevalence appeared low, scan numbers are large and rising; the number with identified AI are increasing still further. The poor AI referral rates, even in centers such as ours where dedicated AI multidisciplinary team meetings and digital management systems are used, highlights the need for new streamlined, clinically effective systems and processes to appropriately manage the AI workload.

Referral pattern and co-management of keratoconus patients in primary eye care: A survey of three European countries.

PURPOSE: To explore current primary care practices in keratoconus management in Portugal and compare with previous reported results in two European countries (the UK and Spain), with a special focus on interdisciplinary collaboration and referral practice patterns. METHODS: An online survey adapted to European professional practice was distributed (via newsletters) by the Portuguese Optometrist Association to explore keratoconus patient management and referral practice patterns among Portuguese practitioners. RESULTS: Responses of 119 optometrists were compared with previous reported of 464 eye-care practitioners (126 in the UK and 338 in Spain). Most respondents (79% in Portugal, 71% in the UK and 76% in Spain; p = 0.31) had < 5 new keratoconus patients each year. No accepted referral criterion was found (p < 0.01) because small number of the respondents (14%) in Portugal referred out at initial diagnosis (50% in the UK and Spain); 32% referred out when progression was detected (17% in the UK and 30% in Spain); and a minority (10% in Portugal, 9% in the UK, and 6% in Spain) referred out when visual acuity was affected. A majority of respondents (83%) in Portugal reported no co-management with ophthalmologists (60% in the UK and 73% in Spain; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that it is necessary to encourage interdisciplinary collaboration between practitioners to improve referral of patients with suspected keratoconus to an ophthalmology specialist to change the course of this disease, to reduce keratoconus progression and visual acuity impairment and to minimize the impact of this disease on patients' quality of life.

A study of referral pattern to pediatric ophthalmology department in a tertiary eye-care center of South-India.

PURPOSE: The study was aimed at finding out the present pattern of referrals to the Pediatric Ophthalmology outpatient department (OPD) in a tertiary eye care hospital and thus identify the discrepancy of referral, if any, which would help to modify and enhance the practice guidelines. METHODS: The study was conducted by retrospectively collecting data from all referral letters that were already uploaded in the Electronic Medical Report (EMR) against all patients from June 2019 to December 2019. All pediatric patients in the age group of 0-16 years were included in the study. The practicing field of referring clinicians was noted along with the maximum information that could be collected from the referral letter and were thus assessed for the quality, accuracy, and timely referral. RESULTS: Out of 77 referrals received in the study period, six referral letters neither had any mention of the designation of the referring clinician nor any specific diagnosis or details. Thus, only 71 patients were included for further study. The referring clinicians were mainly ophthalmologists, pediatricians, general practitioners (GPs), and others (cardiologists, neurologists). Maximum patients were referred by ophthalmologists (76%) but visual acuity was noted only for 30% of these patients. Almost half of the referral diagnosis was accurate. Pediatrician referrals were found to be more detailed and précised. CONCLUSION: There is a need for a standardized hospital-specific format of referrals and basic training to primary care providers on some simple tests (Lights reflex tests) for identifying the "red flags" in pediatric eye examination and thus enhancing the quality and timely referral per se.

Referral patterns to outpatient child and adolescent mental health services and factors associated with referrals being rejected. A cross-sectional observational study.

BACKGROUND: Outpatient child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) are faced with the challenge of balancing increasing demands with limited resources. An additional challenge is high rejection rates of referrals which causes frustration for referring agents and families. In order to effectively plan and allocate available resources within CAMHS there is a need for up-to-date knowledge on referral patterns and factors associated with rejection of referrals. METHODS: In this cross-sectional observational study we did a retrospective review of all referrals (n = 1825) for children (0-18) referred for assessment at the outpatient CAMHS of the North Denmark Region in 2018. RESULTS: The most common referral reasons to CAMHS were attention deficit disorder (ADHD/ADD) (27.9%), autism spectrum disorder (22.4%), affective disorders (14.0%) and anxiety disorders (11.6%). The majority of referrals came from general practitioners, but for neurodevelopmental disorders educational psychologists were the primary referral source. Re-referrals constituted more than a third of all referrals (35.9%). Children in care were overrepresented in this clinical sample and had an increased risk (Adj. OR 2.54) of having their referrals rejected by CAMHS. Referrals from general practitioners were also associated with an increased risk of rejection (Adj. OR 3.29). CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of children with mental disorders have a repeated need for assessment by CAMHS. There is a need for future research on predictors of re-referral to outpatient services to identify potential targets for reducing re-referral rates as well as research on how to optimize service provision for children with a repeated need for assessment. General practitioners are the main gatekeepers to CAMHS and research on interventions to improve the referral process should be aimed towards general practitioners.

Referral pattern and outcomes of neonates from secondary care setting of Aga Khan University Hospital to tertiary care centers in Pakistan.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the reasons of neonatal referrals from secondary-care to tertiary-care setting, and to assess neonatal outcomes for the referred cases. METHODS: The retrospective study was conducted at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, and comprised data from July 2015 to June 2019 Related to all neonates born after 32 weeks of gestation at the satellite secondary-care centres in Kharadar, Garden and Karimabad who had been referred to the main tertiary care hospital. The reason for referral, need of mechanical ventilation, referral place and neonatal outcome were noted. Data was analysed using SPSS 22. RESULTS: Of the 348 cases, 211(60.6%) were boys. The overall mean gestational age was 36.42±2.61 weeks and the mean birth weight was 2.54±0.67 kg. The outcome was neonatal mortality in 42(12%) cases. Of the remaining 306(88%) cases, 284(92.81%) were discharged from the hospital and 22(7.18%) left against medical advice. Overall, mechanical ventilation was needed in 63(18.1%) patients. There was a significant association of mechanical ventilation with low Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, and Respiration score at 1 and 5 minutes (p<0.001), shorter duration of stay (p=0.007), and aggressive resuscitation requirement at birth (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The most common reasons for referral of newborns to tertiary care hospital were respiratory diseases requiring respiratory support and surgical intervention.

Referral Patterns of Patients with Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency to a Specialized Tertiary Center in the United Kingdom.

INTRODUCTION: Limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) is a potentially blinding disease; hence, referral to a specialist service is becoming increasingly common. Our aim was to investigate the referral patterns and associated details. METHODS: We conducted an audit of 100 consecutive patients with LSCD who were referred to our service from 2011 to 2018. Patient demographics, geographical location, cause of LSCD, coexisting ocular diseases, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and extent of LSCD were recorded. The following two subgroups were further analyzed: (1) burns and (2) other causes of LSCD. RESULTS: Out of the 100 patients (138 eyes), 70% were male, with a mean age of 45 years (SD 19). LSCD was unilateral in 62% of the cases. The most common ocular comorbidity was glaucoma, in 21 patients (33 eyes). Burns were the most frequent cause of referral (61%). The mean BCVA of the involved eye was 1.22 (SD 0.8) LogMAR, and total LSCD was present in 75 eyes (54%). There were statistically significant age, gender and eye-involved differences between the burns group and other causes group, mean 39 (SD 17) and 53 (SD 19) years (p < 0.001); 85% were men versus 48.7%, (p = 0.001); and 82% were unilateral versus 31% (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LSCD was more common in men and usually unilateral. Overall, the main cause of LSCD was burns. There were significant differences between the burns group and other causes of LSCD group in terms of age, gender and unilateral involvement that may help to guide management decisions.

Delayed Referral for Adult Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injuries.

PURPOSE: The treatment of traumatic brachial plexus injury (BPI) is time-sensitive, and early nerve reconstruction is associated with superior nerve recovery. The objective of this study was to determine the rate of delayed referral to our centers for traumatic BPI, identifiable causes of delayed referral, and factors associated with delayed referral to a brachial plexus surgeon. METHODS: We identified 84 patients with traumatic BPI referred to and evaluated by brachial plexus surgeons at 2 tertiary care referral centers from 2015 to 2019. Delayed referral was defined as more than 3 months from the date of injury to the date of initial evaluation by a brachial plexus surgeon. Causes of delayed referral were identified by review of the medical record. Bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with delayed referral. RESULTS: Mean age of the 84 patients in the study was 45 years; 69% were male. The most common pattern of BPI was global palsy (39%), followed by upper-trunk palsy (23%) and infraclavicular palsy (15%). Median time from injury to surgical evaluation was 2 months (interquartile range, 2-4 months). Thirty-seven patients had a delayed referral (44%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the hospital to which the patient was referred, Medicare insurance, and motorcycle accident as the mechanism of injury were associated with a delayed referral. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of traumatic BPI patients evaluated at 2 tertiary referral centers in a large metropolitan area in the United States presented in a delayed time frame. Both modifiable and nonmodifiable associations with delayed referral were identified. Patients with Medicare insurance had increased odds of delayed referral. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Establishment of multidisciplinary BPI specialty centers, outreach to local and regional hospitals, and development of referral algorithms and pathways may improve timeliness of referrals.

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis detection and referral trends: impact treatment options.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the patient demographic referred for scoliosis to the Hospital for Sick Children to determine the proportion of patients suitable for brace treatment, as per the Scoliosis Research Society guidelines. There is level 1 evidence that bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) decreases the risk of curve progression and need for surgery, but optimal brace treatment requires early curve detection. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 618 consecutive patients who underwent initial assessment in our Spine Clinic between Jan. 1 and Dec. 31, 2014. We included children 10-18 years, with scoliosis greater than 10°, excluding those diagnosed with non-idiopathic curves. Primary outcomes were Cobb angle, menarchal status, and Risser score. We analyzed the effect of specific referral variables (family history, the person who first noticed the curve, and geographic location of residence) on presenting curve magnitude. RESULTS: During the study period, 335 children met the inclusion criteria, with an average age of 14.1 ± 1.8 years and a mean Cobb angle of 36.8 ± 14.5°. Brace treatment was indicated in 17% of patients; 18% had curves beyond optimal curve range for bracing (> 40°), and 55% were skeletally mature, therefore not brace candidates. The majority of curves (54%) were first detected by the patient or family member and averaged 7° more than curves first detected by a physician. A family history of scoliosis made no difference to curve magnitude, nor did geographic location of residence. CONCLUSION: The majority of AIS patients present too late for effective management with bracing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Brachytherapy utilization for cervical cancer in Western United States border counties: seeking to understand referral patterns for outcome improvement.

PURPOSE: Standard of care for definitive treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is concurrent chemoradiation followed by a brachytherapy boost. Only 55.8% of women in the United States receive brachytherapy, with even lower proportions in San Diego and Imperial Counties. The purpose of this study was to investigate brachytherapy practice and referral patterns in Western United States border region. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A short survey was sent to 28 radiation oncologists in San Diego and Imperial Counties, who treat patients with gynecologic malignancies. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. RESULTS: Seventeen (61%) physicians responded to the survey. All physicians reported some training in cervical cancer brachytherapy during residency, with median 6 months. Only two physicians reported personally treating all cervical cancer patients with brachytherapy; however, 92% of remaining physicians would recommend brachytherapy for patients if given time and access. The most common reason for referral (78%) was patients deemed to require hybrid or interstitial brachytherapy implants. Barriers to referral included patients' preference, insurance status, their resources, or logistics. No changes were reported for brachytherapy practices during the COVID-19 pandemic, except the addition of pre-procedural testing for SARS-CoV-2. Ninety-two percent of physicians identified inadequate maintenance of skills as a barrier to performing brachytherapy, but 77% were not interested in additional training. External beam radiation therapy boosts were rarely recommended in case scenarios describing potentially curable patients. CONCLUSIONS: The importance of brachytherapy is widely recognized for conferring a survival benefit, but barriers to implementation include inadequate training or maintenance of skills, and larger systematic issues related to reimbursement policy, social support, and financial hardship. As most established providers were uninterested in additional brachytherapy training, future approaches to improve patients' access should be multidimensional and reflect the value of brachytherapy in definitive treatment of patients with LACC.

Cutaneous Manifestations and Hormonal Changes Among Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Patients at a Tertiary Care Center.

BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a highly prevalent endocrine disorder affecting 5%-10% of women worldwide. PCOS patients usually present with cutaneous manifestations of hyperandrogenism, such as acne, hirsutism, and androgenic alopecia. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of dermatological manifestations and their association with hormonal changes in PCOS patients. In addition, this study aimed to estimate the prevalence of comorbidities associated with PCOS and to demonstrate the referral pattern among Dermatology, Gynecology, and Primary Health Care (PHC). METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. All PCOS patients who attended KAMC from 2016 to 2021 were included. Data were collected through a retrospective chart review of the electronic medical record system (BestCare) and by utilizing a structured data collection sheet. RESULTS: A total of 447 female patients were diagnosed with PCOS with a median age of 29 years and a median BMI of 28.76 kg/m2.The prevalence of cutaneous manifestations among patients was 68%. Hirsutism (47.3%), acne vulgaris (40.6%), and androgenic alopecia (20.3%) were the most common manifestations. The most common hormonal abnormalities were raised luteinizing hormone (LH) levels in 220 (49.1%) patients and raised LH/follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) ratio in 159 (35.5%) patients. FSH, LH/FSH ratio, and age were significant predictors for acne vulgaris (P-value=0.01, 0.04, and 0.01, respectively). Obesity (44.20%), infertility (25.70%), and dyslipidemia (17%) were the most common comorbidities in our sample. Most patients' first visits and follow-ups were in PHC.  Conclusion: The prevalence of cutaneous manifestations among PCOS patients is relatively high and plays a significant role in making the diagnosis. Therefore, physicians across multiple specialties need to be more aware of the full spectrum of PCOS presentations to alleviate it from its under-diagnosed status.

A retrospective analysis of emergency referrals and admissions to a regional neurosurgical centre 2016-2018.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Emergencies account for 60% of UK neurosurgical workload. We analysed the emergency referrals made to the on-call neurosurgical registrar in a regional centre over three years, aiming to identify temporal trends in volume of referrals, admission practices and major diagnostic categories contributing to referrals and admissions. METHODS: Individual referrals recorded in on-call databases were processed to extract basic demographics, call timing, diagnosis category and whether the patient was admitted under neurosurgery. Linear regression analysis was used to identify temporal trends across the three years. RESULTS: A total of 18128 calls were made to the on-call registrar between 2016 and 2018, with a significant increase in monthly calls. On average, one call was received every 88 minutes. An increasing proportion of these calls were taken out of office hours. Diagnostic categories accounting for the largest percentage of calls were traumatic brain injury (17.7%) and cauda equina syndrome (13%). Significant increases in referral volume were seen in cauda equina syndrome, traumatic brain injury, spinal trauma and spinal tumours, while no category had a significant decrease. The admission rate was 17.1% - no change was seen in this across the study period, resulting in increasing numbers of admissions, reflecting increasing referrals. Categories most likely to result in admission were hydrocephalus (41.1%), spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage (39.4%), intracranial infection (32.6%) and chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH, 32.2%). A change in admission rate was seen only for CSDH, with a significant increase in the percentage of referrals across the study period. CONCLUSION: Emergency neurosurgical referrals continue to rise in the UK at a rate exceeding population growth. This implies a decreasing referral threshold. However, the constant admission rate suggests either an increasing amount of neurosurgical pathology, the threshold for admission/intervention has decreased, or a combination. Neurosurgical services need to adapt in order to meet increasing demands.