Retroperitoneoscopic bladder neck closure for continuous urinary incontinence in Fournier's gangrene.

Introduction: A retroperitoneoscopic procedure for bladder neck closure has not yet been described. Case presentation: Case 1 was a 56-year-old man who underwent clean intermittent catheterization for spastic paraplegia due to a thoracic spinal cord injury 37 years prior. Case 2 was an 80-year-old bedridden woman who underwent urethral catheterization after a femoral fracture and brain infarction 3 years prior. Both patients presented with Fournier's gangrene, and the urogenital region, including the necrotic urethra, was debrided. Although a permanent suprapubic catheter was established, postoperative wound healing was poor owing to continuous urine leakage from the urethral stump. Therefore, we performed retroperitoneoscopic bladder neck closure, and the urinary incontinence was completely resolved. Conclusion: Retroperitoneoscopic bladder neck closure is a feasible and less invasive procedure for treating continuous urinary incontinence from the urethral stump in patients with Fournier's gangrene after surgical debridement and having a permanent suprapubic catheter.

Safety and graft outcome of right retroperitoneal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for living donor kidney transplantation: A comparison with left retroperitoneal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: The left kidney is often preferred for living donor kidney transplantation because of its anatomical advantages. However, the right kidney may be procured due to donor conditions. Few studies have assessed the safety and graft outcome of right retroperitoneal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (RDN). This study aimed to compare the outcomes between right and left RDN with respect to donor outcome and the graft function of recipients. METHODS: This retrospective study included 230 consecutive living donor kidney transplants performed at our institution between May 2019 and March 2023. We reviewed the outcomes of kidney transplant in the right and left kidneys after RDN. RESULTS: A total of 230 living donor kidney transplants were performed, with 32 donors receiving right RDN (right RDN group) and 198 donors receiving left RDN (left RDN group). The renal veins and ureters were significantly shorter in the right RDN group than in the left RDN group (both p < .001). Donor operation and warm ischemia time were significantly longer in the right RDN group than in the left RDN group (p = .012 and p < .001, respectively). None of the groups exhibited any cases of delayed graft function owing to donor-related reasons. Perioperative changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate of recipients and death-censored graft survival were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In RDN, the outcomes of right donor nephrectomy were comparable to those of left donor nephrectomy in terms of donor safety and recipient renal function.

A novel method of tunneling retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: To introduce the surgical technique and our team's extensive experience with tunnel method in laparoscopic adrenalectomy. METHODS: From July 2019 to June 2022, we independently designed and conducted 83 cases of " Tunnel Method Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy," a prospective study. There were 45 male and 38 female patients, ages ranged from 25 to 73 years(mean: 44.6 years).The cases included 59 adrenal cortical adenomas, 9 pheochromocytomas, 6 cysts, 4 myelolipomas, 1 ganglioneuroma, and 4 cases of adrenal cortical hyperplasia. In terms of anatomical location, there were 39 cases on the left side, 42 on the right side, and 2 bilateral cases. Tumor diameters ranged from 0.6 to 5.9 cm(mean: 2.9 cm). Utilizing ultrasound monitoring, percutaneous puncture was made either directly to the target organ or its vicinity, and the puncture path was manually marked. Then, under the direct view of a single-port single-channel laparoscope, the path to the target organ in the retroperitoneum or its vicinity was further delineated and separated. This approach allowed for the insertion of the laparoscope and surgical instruments through the affected adrenal gland, thereby separating the surface of the target organ to create sufficient operational space for the adrenalectomy. RESULTS: All 83 surgeries were successfully completed. A breakdown of the surgical approach reveals that 51 surgeries were done using one puncture hole, 25 with two puncture holes, and 7 with three puncture holes. The operation time ranged from 31 to 105 min (mean: 47 min), with a blood loss of 10 to 220mL (mean: 40 mL). Notably, there were no conversions to open surgery and no intraoperative complications. Postoperative follow-up ranged from 6 to 28 months, during which after re-examination using ultrasound, CT, and other imaging methods, there were no recurrences or other complications detected. CONCLUSIONS: The completion of the tunnel method laparoscopic adrenalectomy represents a breakthrough, transitioning from the traditional step-by-step separation of retroperitoneal tissues to reach the target organ in conventional retroperitoneoscopic surgery. This method directly accesses the target organ, substantially reducing the damage and complications associated with tissue separation in retroperitoneoscopic surgery, As a result, it provides a new option for minimally invasive surgery of retroperitoneal organs and introduces innovative concepts to retroperitoneoscopic surgery.

Optical Trocar Access for Retroperitoneal Robotic-Assisted Pyeloplasty in Children with Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.

Purpose: Retroperitoneal robotic-assisted pyeloplasty (ret-RAP) for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) requires a larger retroperitoneal space (RS) to maintain specified distances between robotic (da Vinci) trocars and between trocars and the region of interest. A modified closed technique (MOT) and conventional closed technique (COT) were compared for creating an adequate RS with optical trocars. Methods: RS access in children with UPJO who underwent ret-RAP (n = 30) was MOT (n = 15) and COT (n = 15). All patients were positioned laterally. For MOT, a 5 mm optical trocar was inserted at the angle formed between the 12th rib and the erector spinae muscles. As the trocar was advanced under direct vision, it pierced the superficial subcutaneous layer, Scarpa's fascia, lumbar fascia, internal/external oblique and transversus abdominalis muscles, and the posterior renal fascia. Once in the RS, the tip of the scope was used for blunt dissection of perirenal fat, the tip was withdrawn until it was outside the perirenal fascia, and used to dissect toward the anterior abdomen in the pararenal fat layer. Results: Ages and weights at ret-RAP were similar (MOT: 5.6 ± 1.8 years versus COT: 7.8 ± 4.6 years; MOT: 20.6 ± 10.1 kg versus COT: 27.6 ± 13.9 kg). Times for RS access were similar (MOT: 1.6 ± 0.5 minutes versus COT: 1.9 ± 0.7 minutes), but RS expansion was significantly quicker in MOT (32.3 ± 8.7 minutes versus 52.0 ± 15.1 minutes; P < .001). Peritoneal injury caused carbon dioxide leakage in 4 of 15 COT cases and 0 of 15 MOT cases. Conclusion: RS expansion with MOT was safer because there were no peritoneal injuries and MOT was quicker than COT.

A Pilot Study to Determine the Role of Spatulating the Ureter During Pyeloplasty in Children for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in the Robotic Era.

Purpose: Spatulation during ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair was evaluated in children treated by robot-assisted retroperitoneal pyeloplasty anastomosis (RRPA). Methods: Intraoperative video recordings (IVRs) of RRPA (n = 22 ureters) performed at a single institute between 2018 and 2022 were reviewed blindly by 5 independent surgeons for perceived difficulty of suturing (DOS; 5 = impossible; 4 = difficult; 3 = tedious; 2 = slow; 1 = easy) and spatulation ranking as superior (+1), inferior (-1), or unnecessary (0). The retroperitoneal space was accessed in the lateral decubitus position using a closed technique under direct vision to avoid air leakage and subcutaneous emphysema. All subjects had a Double-J stent (4.7F) placed. Results: Subjects had similar demographics and preoperative ureter diameters. IVRs were RRPA with spatulation of the ureter on the lateral side (RRPA +SP) (n = 13) and RRPA without spatulation of the ureter (RRPA -SP) (n = 9). Overall DOS scores and coefficients of variation for time taken to place one suture were similar. Total anastomotic time was significantly shorter for RRPA -SP; 67.9 ± 8.4 minutes versus 57.9 ± 9.2 minutes, P = .01. Overall spatulation ranking was 0. Postoperative scanning showed improved drainage in 12 of 13 (92%) in RRPA +SP and 8 of 9 (88%) in RRPA -SP; differences were not significant. One anastomotic stricture in RRPA -SP required open repair. Conclusions: RRPA was quicker and more precise without spatulation. Outcomes of scanning 1 year after RRPA were similar for RRPA -SP and RRPA +SP.

Retroperitoneoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children: Value of Robotic Assistance.

AIM: Retroperitoneal pyeloplasty (RP) for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) performed using retroperitoneoscopy (retro-RP) or robotic assistance (robo-RP) were compared. METHODS: All subjects were Japanese, matched for age, weight, and RP diameters. All RP were performed in the lateral decubitus position at a single institute by the same team using identical protocols. Five independent surgeons were asked to score intraoperative video recordings for perceived difficulty of suturing (DOS; 5 = impossible; 4 = difficult; 3 = tedious; 2 = slow; 1 = easy) and rank RP as +1 if robo-RP appeared to be superior, 0 if they appeared to be the same, and -1 if robo-RP appeared to be inferior. RESULTS: Robo-RP performed 2018-2022 (n = 22) were matched with retro-RP performed 2011-2019 (n = 34). Mean overall operative times were similar (robo-RP: 305.2 ± 57.8 min versus retro-RP: 340.0 ± 117.9 min; p = 0.19), but securing the larger retroperitoneal space required for robo-RP took significantly longer; 50.8 ± 13.9 min versus 24.3 ± 9.6 min; p < 0.0001. Total anastomotic time (TAT) and TAT per suture were both significantly shorter for robo-RP (p < 0.0001). The coefficient of variation for time taken to place one suture was smaller for robo-RP than for retro-RP. DOS was lower for robo-RP with less variance (p < 0.01). Robo-RP had shorter drainage tube insertion, ambulated quicker postoperatively, and shorter hospitalization. Retro-RP had anastomotic complications; leaks (n = 2) and strictures (n = 2, requiring conventional open re-pyeloplasty). Robo-RP had no anastomotic complications and was ranked +1 unanimously. CONCLUSIONS: The RP anastomosis was quicker with less complications and more precise with robotic assistance in matched patients under similar circumstances. Should RP be indicated, robo-RP is recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

An abrupt decrease in arterial blood pressure may predict a high level carbon dioxide embolism in retroperitoneoscopic surgery: case report and a literature review.

BACKGROUND: Carbon dioxide (CO2) embolism is the primary suspect in most cases of intraoperative "cardiovascular" collapse. However, there are few reports about CO2 embolism in retroperitoneal laparoscopy. CASE PRESENTATION: An abrupt decrease in arterial blood pressure was noted in time of retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy in a 40 years old male patient with adrenal adenoma. The end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) and saturation of oxygen were stable with normal cardiography until anesthesiologists found the change of resistant of peripheral circulation, then they gave us a hint of hemorrhage. However, the blood pressure had no reaction to one bolus of epinephrine administration when trying to improve the circulation. Five minutes later, a sudden fall of blood pressure was noted, and then we stopped the processing of cutting tissue and trying to coagulate any bleeding in the operation field. Further vasopressor support proved to be completely ineffective. With the help of transesophageal echocardiography, we found the bubbles in the right atrium, which confirmed the diagnosis of an intraoperative gas embolism (Grade IV). We stopped the carbon dioxide insufflation and deflated the retroperitoneal cavity. All the bubbles in the right atrium totally disappeared and the blood pressure, resistance of peripheral circulation and cardiac output returned to normal 20 min later. We continued the operation and completed it in 40 min with the 10 mmHg air pressure. CONCLUSION: CO2 embolism may occour during retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy, and an acute decrease in arterial blood pressure should alert both the urologists and anesthesiologists to this rare and fatal complication.

Single-Position Complete Retroperitoneoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy with Bladder Cuff Excision for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

Purpose: We proposed a new technique, single-position complete retroperitoneoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (SCRNU), which proved to be efficient for the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Materials and Methods: In this study, we retrospectively evaluated 86 patients diagnosed with UTUC at our hospital from June 2013 to June 2021. The patients who underwent traditional retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy (TRNU) (n = 28) and SCRNU (n = 58) were consecutively enrolled. Demographic characteristics, perioperative parameters, and follow-up data were collected and compared between the two groups. Results: Both procedures were performed effectively in 86 patients without converting to open surgery. The mean follow-up time was 45.4 months for the SCRNU group and 39 months for the TRNU group. All follow-up patients survived without incidence of bladder incision tumor. Further, the follow-up results showed that there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate of bladder tumor between the two methods. SCRNU group was superior to TRNU group because of shorter operating time, fewer perioperative complications, less postoperative pain, lower recurrence rate, and cheaper medical expenditure. Conclusions: The SCRNU technique is less invasive, have fewer complications, and has a better cosmetic outcome.

Impact of the introduction of pure retroperitoneoscopic living-donor nephrectomy on perioperative donor outcomes: A propensity score matching comparison with hand-assisted laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: We previously reported that the outcomes of pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy are superior to those of hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy. Consequently, we introduced pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy in our hospital. Here, we compared perioperative outcomes between hand-assisted intra-abdominal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from 315 living-donor kidney transplantation procedures performed between October 2015 and December 2020 (213 involving hand-assisted intra-abdominal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, October 2015 to June 2019; 102 involving pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy, May 2019 to December 2020). After propensity score matching, 90 transplantations were included in each group (n = 180 overall). RESULTS: Donors in the pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy group had longer warm ischemia times (P < .001), lower serum C-reactive protein concentrations and white blood cell counts on postoperative day 1 (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively), and shorter postoperative stays (P < .001) than donors in the hand-assisted intra-abdominal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy group. Five (5.6%) modified Clavien-classifiable complications occurred in the hand-assisted intra-abdominal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy group; no complications occurred in the pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy group (P = 0.008). One recipient in the hand-assisted intra-abdominal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy group had donor-related delayed graft function. There were no significant differences between groups in recipient estimated glomerular filtration on postoperative day 7. CONCLUSION: The introduction of pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy was safe and effective. Moreover, it was less invasive and less harmful for donors, compared with hand-assisted intra-abdominal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy; recipient outcomes were equivalent.

Retroperitoneal totally endoscopic prosthetic repair of primary lumbar hernia.

PURPOSE: A primary lumbar hernia is a rare entity that requires surgical management, but the preferred technique has not been established. We herein describe a standardized and reproducible retroperitoneal totally endoscopic prosthetic (TEP) repair technique for primary lumbar hernias. METHODS: Ten adult patients with primary lumbar hernias underwent retroperitoneal TEP repair from February 2019 to July 2020. A sufficient retroperitoneal space was established to accommodate a non-coated polypropylene mesh to reinforce the weakened flank area, and hernia content reduction and defect closure were then performed. The patients' clinical data were prospectively collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Nine patients had a primary superior lumbar hernia and one patient had a primary diffuse lumbar hernia. All operations were successfully performed without serious intraoperative complications. The mean defect area was 6.4 ± 2.8 cm2 (range 4-12 cm2), and the mean mesh area was 144.6 cm2 (range 130-180 cm2). The average operative time (skin to skin) was 49.0 ± 5.7 min (range 40-60 min), and intraoperative bleeding was minimal. The mean visual analog pain scale score at rest on the first postoperative day was 2.2 (range 2-3). The average length of postoperative stay was 1.5 days (range 1-2 days). No serious postoperative complications occurred. No recurrence, chronic pain, or mesh infection occurred during a mean follow-up period of 7.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: The retroperitoneal TEP repair for primary lumbar hernias is safe, efficient, and reproducible. Anti-adhesive coated meshes and fixation tackers are not required, making this a cost-effective procedure that is worthy of recommendation.

[Design and clinical application of goal-oriented retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy].

Objective: To investigate the goal-oriented retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy and report the initial experiment. Methods: A total of 102 patients were selected to our clinic experiment, and performed retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy with the new method. including adrenal cortex adenoma 76 cases, phaochromocytoma 12 cases, adrenal cyst 6 cases, myelolipoma 4 cases, gangliocytoma 1 case and corticohyperplassia 3 cases. The mean diameter of the tumors was 2.8 cm (0.5-5.8 cm). The operative procedure was briefly described as such, with ultrasound guiding, a needle was punched percutaneously up to the adrenal mass or the renal upper pole from lateral to posterior axillary line just below the inferior border of the 12th rib. labeled the pathway of the needle with methylene blue. Along the way of the needle, a 12 mm port was introduced into the retroperitoneal space with closed method, and the laparoscope with a working tunnel was introduced to make a tunnel along the label up to the adrenal for finally removing it. Additional port should be used when it was needed in the procedure. Results: The procedures of all patients were successful, and 10 patients were performed with only one port, 81 patients with two ports, 11 patients with three ports. The operative duration was 49 (31-115) min, the average blood loss was 38 (0-260) ml. There was no transition to open surgery and no perioperative complications. The length of postoperative hospital stay was 4.1 d (2-7 d). 98 patients were available for follow-up of 16.5 months (1-38 months), no complication was found. Conclusions: The new method of retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy is feasible and safe for renal masses, and compared to the conventional method, it may be less trauma to the abdominal wall and retropertoneal tissue, and it was also better on cosmetics.

Anterior approach retroperitoneal laparoscopic renal surgery in children.

Retroperitoneoscopic renal surgery is performed by lateral or posterior approaches. Iterative modification led to development of an alternative 'anterior' approach. The study authors' experience with this novel approach in a prospective series of 69 children that includes 17 infants is reported. Mean operating time was 225 min for reduction pyeloplasty. Peritoneal tear is not uncommon (22%) but often does not require conversion. In the study authors' early experience, the conversion rate was 17% and postoperative complications 2.9%. This approach overcomes many existing challenges with retroperitoneoscopy. Benefits of exposure, orientation, and working space achieved with a transperitoneal approach are afforded while preserving the advantages of retroperitoneoscopy.

Initial Experience of Retroperitoneoscopic Surgery in Benign Renal Diseases.

BACKGROUND: To review our early experience to determine the feasibility, efficacy and clinical outcomes of retroperitoneoscopic surgery in benign renal diseases. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study carried out between December 2014 to March 2018. Among 14 patients enrolled in the study, 9 cases of nonfunctioning kidney underwent retroperitoneoscopic simple nephrectony, 4 cases of benign renal cortical cysts underwent decortication of cysts and one case of pelviureteric junction obstruction underwent Anderson Hynes pyeloplasty. RESULTS: Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy, renal cyst decortication and A-H pyeloplasty were performed in 13 patients successfully. The procedure in one patient of RP nephrectomy converted to open surgery due to dense perinephric and hilar adhesions. Which resulted to failure to progress. The mean operative time of RP nephrectomy, decortications and pyeloplasty were 206.4 (150-248), 67.5 (60-80) and 275 minutes, average blood loss was 96.7 (50-120), 27.5 (20-30) and 70 ml, and the mean hospital stay were 3.5 (3-4), 2 (2-2) and 4 days respectively. The perioperative period was uneventful. CONCLUSIONS: Retroperitoneoscopic surgery is feasible and safe in benign renal diseases. Because of reduced post operative pain and less chances of bowel injury, retroperitoneoscopic surgery is gaining more popularity.

Retroperitoneoscopic Resection of Paraganglioma in a Hemodialysis Patient.

Background: Paraganglioma is rarely reported in patients on hemodialysis. We present a hemodialysis patient in whom incidentally identified paraganglioma was treated by retroperitoneoscopic resection. Case Presentation: A retroperitoneal tumor was identified incidentally in an 80-year-old man on hemodialysis for chronic renal dysfunction. The patient did not complain of any clinical symptoms suggestive of paraganglioma and plasma catecholamines levels were normal. However, iodine-123-metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG) scintigraphy showed obvious radionuclide accumulation in the tumor, leading to a diagnosis of paraganglioma. After initiation of treatment with an alpha-adrenergic receptor blocker, retroperitoneoscopic resection of the tumor was performed. Pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. Conclusion: Although testing urine samples is unlikely available in hemodialysis patients, paraganglioma can be diagnosed by MIBG scintigraphy. Retroperitoneoscopic resection is effective for managing retroperitoneal paraganglioma in hemodialysis patients.

Preliminary clinical experience with robotic retroperitoneoscopic pancreatic surgery.

BACKGROUNDS: Retroperitoneoscopic surgery has shown advantages in urological surgery. However, its application in pancreatic surgery for neoplasm is rare. Robotic surgical system with its magnified view and flexible instruments may provide a superior alternative to conventional laparoscopic system in retroperitoneoscopic surgery. We aimed to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes in a series of patients treated by robotic retroperitoneoscopic pancreatic surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: Between March 2016 and May 2016, four patients with solitary pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms were treated with robotic retroperitoneoscopic surgery. Prospective collected clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Three patients underwent distal pancreatectomy (one combined with resection of left adrenal adenoma), and one patient enucleation. The mean operative time was 80 min (range 30-110 min). The estimated blood loss was insignificant. There was no conversion to open procedure. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 5.25 days (range 4-6 days). The mean tumor size was 1.375 cm (range 1.0-1.8 cm) in diameter. All patients' blood glucose level returned to normal range within 1 week postoperatively. Two patients had pancreatic biochemical leak. No patients underwent subsequent treatment, and no recurrence occurred during the 12-month follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: This study preliminarily indicates that robotic retroperitoneoscopic pancreatic surgery is safe and feasible for neoplasms in the dorsal portion of distal pancreas in selected patients, with some potential advantages of straightforward access, simple and fine manipulation, short operative time, and fast recovery.

Evaluating the learning curve for retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy in a high-volume center for laparoscopic adrenal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is an effective method for benign adrenal tumor removal. In the literature, both lateral transperitoneal (TLA) and posterior retroperitoneoscopic (RPA) approaches are described. Since 2007, the number of patients increased significantly in our center. Therefore, RPA was introduced in 2011 because of its potential advantages in operating and recovery times. The learning curve of RPA is now evaluated. METHODS: All data of patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy from 2007 until 2014 were prospectively collected. Patients were eligible for RPA with a tumor <7 cm, with BMI < 35 kg/m2, and with low suspicion of malignancy. The learning curve of RPA was measured by operating time. Furthermore, blood loss, preoperative complications and hospital stay were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were performed using SPSS 20.0. RESULTS: In the study period, 290 patients underwent surgery, of whom 113 underwent RPA. After starting with RPA, operating times decreased significantly (median 100 min in the first 20 patients to 60 min after 40 patients, p < 0.05). There was a significant difference in operating times (median 108 vs. 62 min, p < 0.05) and hospital stay (median 4 vs. 3 days, p < 0.05) in unilateral surgery in favor of RPA, compared to TLA. Also in bilateral surgery, operating times were significantly shorter (median 236 vs. 117 min, p < 0.05). In both groups, few major complications occurred. CONCLUSION: After the introduction of RPA, a short learning curve was seen for a single surgeon with extensive experience in laparoscopic adrenal surgery. Compared to TLA, RPA has significant advantages in operating times and hospital stay. Therefore, RPA may be the preferred approach for patients with BMI < 35 kg/m2 and small benign adrenal tumors (<7 cm).