Cost-effectiveness of brentuximab vedotin plus chemotherapy for previously untreated CD30-positive peripheral T-cell lymphoma in Canada.

AIMS: To support reimbursement requests in Canada, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris) in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (A + CHP) compared with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) as frontline treatment for CD30-expressing peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) using results from the ECHELON-2 clinical trial. The PTCL subtypes included were systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL), PTCL-not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A partitioned survival model consisting of three health states (progression-free survival [PFS], post-progression survival [PPS], and death) was constructed from the perspective of the Canadian publicly funded healthcare system over a lifetime horizon. Efficacy, safety, and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) data were obtained from ECHELON-2. Medical resource use and costs were derived from Canadian literature and standard sources. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per life-years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained were calculated. Sensitivity analyses were performed to account for uncertainty in key parameters. All costs are reported in Canadian dollars. RESULTS: A + CHP, when compared with CHOP, was associated with an estimated mean gain of 2.90 LYs and 2.38 QALYs and a mean incremental cost of $76,491. The ICER for A + CHP compared with CHOP was estimated at $26,340 per LY gained and $32,177 per QALY gained. In sensitivity analyses, the ICERs remained below $60,000 per QALY gained. Time horizon, patient starting age, and discount rate affected the results, as the ICER was driven by long-term survival gains observed with A + CHP compared with CHOP. LIMITATIONS: Real-world downstream treatments (such as stem cell transplantation) may differ from the treatment protocol followed in the ECHELON-2 trial. CONCLUSIONS: A + CHP compared with CHOP provides a cost-effective treatment option with improved clinical outcomes that are clinically relevant and a comparable safety profile for adults with previously untreated CD30-expressing sALCL, PTCL-NOS, or AITL in Canada.

Genomic Analysis of Cutaneous CD30-Positive Lymphoproliferative Disorders.

Primary cutaneous CD30+ T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders are the second most common cutaneous lymphomas. According to the World Health Organization, CD30+ T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders include primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (C-ALCL) and lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP) as well as borderline lesions. C-ALCL and LyP are thought to represent two ends of a spectrum of diseases that have different clinical presentations, clinical courses, and prognoses in their classic forms but share the same histology of medium to large CD30+ atypical lymphoid cell infiltrates. Because the behavior of these entities is different clinically and prognostically, we aim to search for oncogenic genomic variants using whole-exome sequencing that drive the development of LyP and C-ALCL. Clinical information, pathology, immunohistochemistry, and T-cell rearrangements on six cases of LyP and five cases of C-ALCL were reviewed to confirm the rendered diagnosis before whole-exome sequencing of all specimens. Both LyP and C-ALCL had recurrent alterations in epigenetic modifying genes affecting histone methylation and acetylation (SETD2, KMT2A, KMT2D, and CREBBP). However, they also harbor unique differences with mutations in signal transducer and activator of transcription gene STAT3 of the Jak/signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway and EOMES, a transcription factor involved in lymphocyte development, only noted in C-ALCL specimens. Genomic characterization of LyP and C-ALCL in this series confirms the role of multiple pathways involved in the biology and development of these lymphomatous processes. The identification of similar aberrations within the epigenetic modifying genes emphasizes common potential development mechanisms of lymphomagenesis within lymphoproliferative disorders being shared between LyP and C-ALCL; however, the presence of differences may account for the differences in clinical course.

CD30, CD15, CD50, and PAX5 Expressions as Diagnostic Markers for Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) and Systemic Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (sALCL).

BACKGROUND: the expression of CD30, CD15, CD50, and PAX5 are used to help in confirming diagnosis of HL and sALCL; however data on the proportion of these markers have not been available. The study was aimed to identify the proportion of CD30, CD15, CD50 and PAX5 expressions and characteristics of patients with HL and sALCL at Dharmais National Cancer Center Hospital between 2005 and 2015. METHODS: a retrospective observational study was conducted using data from medical records and histopathological results of HL and sALCL adult patients who sought treatment at the hospital between 2005 and 2015. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) examinations were performed and data on the proportion of positive CD30, CD15, CD50, and PAX5 expressions were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: a total of 45 patients were recruited in this study, with the majority (42 patients, 93.3%) were HL patients and only 6.7% were sALCL patients. The median age of HL patients was younger than sALCL patients; 35 (18-72 years old) versus 54 (49-61 years old). Moreover, the immunohistochemistry examination demonstrated that the positive CD15, CD30, CD50, and PAX5 expressions were found respectively in 37.5%, 88.9%, 31.2%, and 31.2% patients with HL; while in patients with sALCL, in spite of their small sample size, positive CD30, CD15, CD50 and PAX5 expressions were found in 100%; 66,7%; 50%; and 50%, respectively. Overall, CD15, CD50, and PAX5 positive expressions were found in 39.5%, 32.4%, and 32.4% patients who had HL and sALCL; while positive expression of CD30 was found in 89.5% of them. CONCLUSION: present study shows that almost 90% patients have positive CD30 expression;  while the positive expressions of CD15, CD50, and PAX5 are found in less than 40% patients. It indicates that CD30 is an important diagnostic marker for HL and sALCL and it may improve treatment strategy.