Efficacy of sarilumab and dexamethasone co-administration for lowering multiple blood biomarkers in the treatment of cytokine release syndrome in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

The current study was planned to explore the potential synergistic role of the co-administration of sarilumab and dexamethasone in reducing blood biomarkers associated with cytokine release syndrome in hospitalised patients of coronavirus disease-2019. The sample comprised 22 patients hospitalised with severe and critical severity levels and who were treated with sarilumab and dexamethasone. Positive responses were seen in blood biomarkers, including decreased interleukin-6 alpha levels and improved oxygen saturation. Tumour necrosis factor, Ddimer, C-reactive protein, ferritin and lymphocyte count also showed positive responses in patients who survived than those who died. Lactate dehydrogenase levels fluctuated with improvement among the survivors, but had limited effectiveness in those who died. The findings suggested promising avenues for future treatment strategies in patients with severe coronavirus disease-2019 and cytokine release syndrome.

The effects of sarilumab as monotherapy and in combination with non-methotrexate disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs on unacceptable pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a post-hoc analysis of the HARUKA phase 3 study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate unacceptable pain (UP; visual analogue scale [VAS] >40 mm) and uncontrolled inflammation (C-reactive protein [CRP] ≥1.0 mg/dL) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving sarilumab (SAR) as monotherapy or in combination with non-methotrexate conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (SAR+csDMARDs). METHODS: In the HARUKA phase 3 study (NCT02373202), Japanese patients received either SAR monotherapy (n=61) or SAR+csDMARDs (n=30). In this post-hoc analysis, changes in the proportions of patients with/without UP and controlled/uncontrolled inflammation were assessed over 52 weeks. RESULTS: At baseline, 80.3% (49/61) of patients receiving SAR monotherapy had UP and this proportion decreased with treatment to 55.9% (33/59) at Week 4 and 15.5% (9/58) at Week 52. The SAR+csDMARDs group achieved a reduction in UP from 73.3% (22/30) at baseline to 34.5% (10/29) at Week 4 and 0% (0/24) by Week 52. At baseline, 34.4% (21/61) and 50% (15/30) of patients had both UP and uncontrolled inflammation in the SAR monotherapy and SAR+csDMARDs groups; by Week 2, the proportions decreased to 6.6% (4/61) and 3.3% (1/30), respectively; and 0% in both groups by Week 52. CONCLUSION: UP and inflammation were reduced in patients with active RA in Japan in both SAR monotherapy and SAR+csDMARDs treatment groups.

Efficacy and safety of sarilumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis stratified by age (<65 and ≥65 years): A post-hoc analysis of Japanese phase 3 clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of sarilumab in older patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This is a post-hoc analysis of KAKEHASI (NCT02293902) and HARUKA (NCT02373202) trials with stratification by age (<65 and ≥65 years). Patients with moderately-to-severely active RA were treated with sarilumab in combination with methotrexate (MTX) or with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) or as monotherapy. The primary endpoints in KAKEHASI and HARUKA trials were the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) responses at Week 24 and safety, respectively. Secondary endpoints were other RA disease activity measures, including Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI). RESULTS: Approximately 20% of patients were aged ≥65 years in treatment arms across both trials, except the sarilumab+csDMARDs arm (40%, 12/30). ACR20 response rates were similar between age groups across sarilumab treatment arms and similar results were obtained for CDAI scores. Safety profiles were similar between age groups except for a higher incidence of serious adverse events in patients aged ≥65 years in the sarilumab+MTX arm. CONCLUSIONS: In Japanese patients with RA enrolled in phase 3 studies for sarilumab, no clear difference in efficacy or safety was observed between patients aged <65 and ≥65 years.

Assessment of adverse events related to anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibodies using the FDA adverse event reporting system:a real-world pharmacovigilance study.

BACKGROUND: Interleukin-6 (IL-6) monoclonal antibodies are commonly acknowledged for their efficacy in managing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, there remains a paucity of comprehensive studies on their potential adverse effects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This is a retrospective pharmacovigilance investigation. We employed FAERS using OpenVigil FDA to detect adverse reactions linked to the interleukin-6 antagonist tocilizumab and sarilumab. RESULTS: Completely 17,037,364 reports were collected from the FAERS database, with 67,976 reports identified as 'primary suspected (PS)' adverse events (AEs) for tocilizumab, and 12,560 reports for sarilumab. AEs induced by both drugs involved 27 organ systems. 109 significant disproportionality preferred terms (PTs) of tocilizumab and 158 significant disproportionality PTs meeting the criteria of sarilumab across all four algorithms were retained simultaneously. A higher incidence of adverse reactions occurred in females aged 45-64 years, with a higher rate of subsequent hospitalization. Both drugs exhibited adverse reactions consistent with previously reported side effects, such as leukopenia, elevated liver enzymes, and hypercholesterolemia. Additionally, there was a strong correlation with gastrointestinal issues. Unexpected significant adverse events, including diabetes, fluctuations in blood pressure, drug ineffectiveness, malignancies, and disorders of the nervous system, were also observed. Gender and age differences existed in AEs signals related to IL-6RAs. CONCLUSION: Our study identified significant new AE signals for interleukin-6 receptor antagonists, potentially supporting clinical monitoring and risk identification for this class of drugs.

Investigational agents for polymyalgia rheumatica treatment: assessing the critical needs for future development.

INTRODUCTION: Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is an inflammatory rheumatic disorder characterized by pain and stiffness in the shoulder and pelvic girdles, constitutional symptoms, and elevated acute-phase reactants. Glucocorticoids (GCs) remain the first-choice treatment for PMR, but relapses are common. Identification of steroid-sparing agents is therefore of utmost importance. AREAS COVERED: The efficacy of conventional immunosuppressive drugs is controversial. The use of interleukin (IL)-6 receptor inhibitors proved to be effective and safe in treating PMR patients. Currently, there are 12 ongoing clinical trials exploring potential treatments such as leflunomide, low-dose IL-2, rituximab, abatacept, secukinumab, Janus kinase inhibitors, and selective inhibitors like SPI-62 and ABBV 154. EXPERT OPINION: The high efficacy of IL-6 R receptor inhibitors as well as the numerous drug trials currently recruiting suggest that several therapeutic options will be available in the near future. Accurate diagnosis and early stratification of PMR patients according to the giant cell arteritis-PMR Spectrum Disease 'GPSD' and potential risk factors for relapsing disease or GC-related adverse events are crucial to identify patients who would benefit most from GC-sparing agents. The development of internationally accepted definitions for remission and relapse is urgently needed. Early referral strategies to specialist settings would improve disease stratification and personalized treatment.

Safety of sarilumab in a Japanese population with rheumatoid arthritis by age group: Data from an interim analysis of a post-marketing surveillance study.

OBJECTIVES: Using data from a post-marketing surveillance, this interim subgroup analysis investigated the safety of sarilumab in younger (<65 years) and older patients (≥65 and ≥75 years) with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: During this interim analysis, patients who were treated with sarilumab in Japan were enrolled between June 2018-2021. Data collected by 12 January 2022 were analysed, with adverse drug events monitored over 52 weeks. RESULTS: Of 972 patients with available data, proportion of patients aged <65 years, ≥65 years and ≥75 years were 40.8%, 59.2% and 27.8%, respectively. Most patients (95.5%) received the standard 200 mg dose of sarilumab as the initial dose. Adverse drug reactions were reported in 24.6% of patients, with serious events accounting for 6.4% of cases. No malignancy and low incidences of adverse drug reactions of special interest were reported across all age groups (<65 years, 7.8%; ≥65 years, 8.2%; ≥75 years, 8.5%). When stratified by absolute neutrophil count above and below the lower limit of normal, there were no numerical differences in incidences of serious and non-serious infections between age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of age, sarilumab therapy was well tolerated by patients with rheumatoid arthritis, with no new safety signals reported in this study.

Cancer risk with tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, and rituximab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a Danish cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate cancer risk in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, or rituximab compared with those who received tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and compared with biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARD) naïve RA patients. METHODS: Nationwide registry-based cohort study of RA patients initiating treatment with tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, rituximab, TNFi, and bDMARD-naive patients their second type of conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD). Patients were identified in DANBIO and followed for cancer from 2006-2020. Patients could contribute multiple treatments, with person years (PYRS), deaths, and cancers allocated to each treatment group in a 'latest type of treatment' manner. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and weighted cause-specific Cox models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for cancer in each tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, and rituximab group compared with TNFI and bDMARD naïve groups, respectively. RESULTS: In total, 21 982 treatment initiations, 96 475 PYRS, and 1423 cancers were identified. There were no statistically significant increased HRs for overall cancer in tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, or rituximab treatment groups (HRs ranged from 0.7-1.1). More than five years of abatacept exposure showed a non-significantly increased HR compared with TNFi (HR 1.41, 95% confidence intervals CI 0.74-2.71). For hematological cancers, rituximab treatment showed non-significantly reduced HRs: vs TNFi (HR 0.09; 95%CI 0.00-2.06) and bDMARD-naïve (HR 0.13; 95%CI 0.00-1.89). CONCLUSION: Treatment with tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, or rituximab in RA patients was not associated with increased risks of cancer compared with TNFi-treated and with bDMARD-naïve RA patients in a real-world setting.

Effectiveness and safety of sarilumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A multicenter, retrospective, inverse probability of treatment-weighted analysis based on the FRAB-registry.

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and safety of sarilumab (SARI) were investigated in real-world clinical practice in Japan. METHOD: Subjects were 121 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in 23 medical institutions in Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan, who started treatment with SARI between May 2018 and November 2021. Data on the SARI starting dose, patients' baseline characteristics, disease activity, and blood test data at the start of treatment, as well as follow-up data on the SARI dose, disease activity, and adverse events until Week 52. Safety and the continuation rate calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method were evaluated, and the effectiveness of treatment at 1 year was assessed using the clinical disease activity index (CDAI). Patients' baseline characteristics for which significant differences were evident were adjusted with a propensity score by using the inverse probability of treatment-weighting (IPTW) method. RESULTS: The continuation rate at Week 52 was 66.1%. The CDAI showed significant improvement from Week 4 that was maintained until Week 52. Comparisons conducted after IPTW adjustment for patients' baseline characteristics for which significant differences were evident revealed no significant differences at Week 52 between the groups classified by higher or lower body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.231), serious comorbidities (p = 0.973), MTX use (p = 0.321), or prior treatment with ≤ 1 or ≥ 2 biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) (p = 0.765). CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that the efficacy of SARI is not affected by BMI, comorbidities, MTX use, or the number of prior b/tsDMARDs, and no new safety concerns were apparent. Key Points • This is the first real-world clinical study to report on the efficacy and safety of SARI in Japan. The results of this study indicate that the efficacy of SARI was not affected by BMI, comorbidities, MTX use, or number of previous b/tsDMARDs. • It was shown that SARI can be used in a Japanese population without any new side effects.

Effect of Anti-Interleukin-6 Agents on Psychopathology in a Sample of Patients with Post-COVID-19 Syndrome: An Observational Study.

Interleukin 6 (IL-6) receptor inhibitors tocilizumab and sarilumab have recently been approved for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). They also affect mood, even though their effect on the post-COVID-19 syndrome-related psychopathology still has to be investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate their effect on psychopathology in a sample of patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome. We included 246 patients (34% female, 66% male) aged 18-75 years who had been hospitalized for COVID. Patients were split into those who received anti-IL-6 receptor agents (Anti-IL-6-R, N = 88) and those who did not (Ctrl, N = 158). The former group was further split into those receiving tocilizumab (TOC, N = 67) and those receiving sarilumab (SAR, N = 21). Groups were compared based on clinical characteristics before and during COVID-19 as well as on physical and psychiatric symptoms after COVID-19. Ctrl had less psychiatric and physical symptoms during hospitalization and more post-COVID-19 diarrhea, headache, cough, and dyspnea upon exertion than those receiving IL-6-receptor inhibitors. Ctrl also showed greater difficulties in emotion regulation. These differences were driven by TOC vs. Ctrl, whereas differences between SAR and Ctrl or TOC did not reach significance. IL-6 receptor inhibitors are related to a lower post-COVID-19 illness burden and seem to be effective in emotion regulation. Further research is needed to confirm these findings.

Nuevas opciones de tratamiento para el paciente con COVID-19. La experiencia hematológica / New therapeutic options for the COVID-19 patient. The experience from the hematologist

Resumen En la actual pandemia de enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) se ha observado que las principales complicaciones se presentan como resultado de la liberación de múltiples citocinas como interleucina (IL) 1, IL-6, factor de necrosis tumoral alfa e interferones de tipo 1 que generan un estado proinflamatorio caracterizado por lesión tisular pulmonar y subsecuentemente falla orgánica múltiple. En el campo de la hematología se cuenta con experiencia en el uso de diversos fármacos diseñados para limitar estas citocinas los cuales se han utilizado ya en pacientes con COVID-19 entre los que se encuentran los inhibidores de la IL-6 como el tocilizumab, el sarilumab y el siltuximab, el inhibidor de IL-1 anakinra y los inhibidores de la janus cinasa ruxolitinib y baricitinib. Al conocer la base fisiopatológica de la COVID-19, la utilidad de este tipo de fármacos muestra resultados alentadores para los cuadros moderados a graves de la enfermedad y extender su uso en ensayos clínicos mayores.

Abstract In the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, it has been observed that the main complications arise as a result of the release of multiple cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α and type 1 interferons that generate a proinflammatory state characterized by lung tissue injury and subsequently multiple organ failure. In the hematology field, there is experience in the use of various drugs designed to limit these cytokines which have already been used in patients with COVID-19 including IL-6 inhibitors such as tocilizumab, sarilumab, and siltuximab; the IL-1 inhibitor anakinra; and the janus kinase inhibitors ruxolitinib and baricitinib. Knowing the pathophysiological basis of COVID-19, the usefulness of this type of drugs show encouraging results for moderate to severe symptoms of the disease and encourages its use in larger clinical trials.