Selinexor in combination with dexamethasone with or without bortezomib in heavily pretreated multiple myeloma: A case series.

This report describes the characteristics and outcomes of 18 heavily pretreated patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who were subsequently treated with selinexor. This is a case series of 18 patients with MM who were treated with selinexor and dexamethasone (Sd) or selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (SVd) in 12 hospitals in the UK between 2019 and 2021. Eight patients received Sd and 10 patients received SVd. Patients received a median of five prior treatment lines, including immunomodulatory agents in 94% and proteasome inhibitors in 94%. Ten patients (55%) had triple-class refractory disease. Six of the 12 evaluable patients achieved ≥partial response. The median progression-free survival was 5.6 months, which was higher with SVd (5.7 months) than with Sd (2.1 months). The results support a treatment benefit of selinexor in heavily pretreated patients and support the notion that selinexor may overcome resistance to prior therapies, with no new safety concerns arising.

Case report: Combination therapy with selinexor, decitabine and half-dose CAG regimen for relapsed elderly acute myeloid leukemia.

The treatment of elderly patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) poses significant challenges. Currently, one promising strategy in therapeutic interventions for geriatric individuals revolves around the utilization of small molecule targeted drugs either independently or in conjunction with demethylating agents. In this report, we present the successful attainment of complete remission in an elderly female patient with relapsed AML, the patient underwent treatment with a combination of Selinexor, decitabine, and a half-dose CAG regimen for two cycles. Subsequently, the patient has sustained this remission through consolidation therapy involving a medium dose of Ara-c. This therapeutic regimen has demonstrated favorable outcomes in the management of relapsed AML in elderly individuals. Furthermore, the adverse reactions were manageable. In order to devise an efficacious treatment regimen for elderly patients suffering from relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia, it is imperative to incorporate a larger cohort of cases for clinical investigation.

Selinexor targeting XPO1 promotes PEG3 nuclear accumulation and suppresses cholangiocarcinoma progression.

BACKGROUND: The role of selinexor, a targeted inhibitor of exportin 1 (XPO1), in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma is not yet fully understood. This study conducted comprehensive in vitro and in vivo investigations to elucidate the effects of selinexor on cholangiocarcinoma, with a focus on its mechanistic relationship with the cellular localization of Paternally Expressed Gene 3 (PEG3). METHODS: A patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model was established using samples from a cholangiocarcinoma patient in immunodeficient mice to assess the in vivo effects of selinexor. Additionally, cholangiocarcinoma cell lines HuCC-T1 and BRE were cultured to evaluate selinexor's impact on cell proliferation, invasion, migration, cell cycle, and apoptosis. HuCC-T1 cells were also implanted in immunodeficient mice for further investigation. Immunofluorescence and Western blotting were employed to observe the expression and localization of the PEG3 protein. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that selinexor significantly inhibited tumor growth in the cholangiocarcinoma PDX model and promoted the accumulation of PEG3 protein within the nuclei of tumor cells. In vitro experiments showed that selinexor effectively suppressed cholangiocarcinoma cell proliferation, invasion, and migration, while also impeding the cell cycle and inducing apoptosis. Notably, selinexor markedly facilitated the nuclear accumulation of PEG3 protein in cholangiocarcinoma cells. However, when PEG3 expression was knocked down, the effects of selinexor on cholangiocarcinoma were significantly reversed. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that selinexor inhibits the progression of cholangiocarcinoma by targeting XPO1 and promoting the nuclear accumulation of PEG3 protein, thereby hindering the cell cycle and inducing apoptosis.

[Application and Research Progress of Selinexor in Hematologic Tumors Other Than Multiple Myeloma --Review].

Exportin-1 (XPO1) is a major transporter for hundreds of proteins. Selinexor is the first generation XPO1 inhibitor. At present, selinexor has gained more attention in the application of multiple myeloma (MM). Meanwhile, the latest clinical trials have confirmed that whether it is a single agent or combined with other chemotherapy regimens, selinexor can also achieve good therapeutic effects in patients with leukemia and lymphoma. This review summarizes the results of preclinical studies and clinical trials of selinexor in treatment of non-MM hematological malignancies, aiming to explore how to choose single agent or in combination with other regimens as induction chemotherapy.

Phase IB Study of Oral Selinexor in Combination with Rituximab and Platinum Chemotherapy in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Lymphoma-Final Analysis.

PURPOSE: Selinexor is an oral selective inhibitor of exportine-1 (XPO1) with efficacy as a single agent in heavily pretreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We conducted a study investigating the combination of selinexor with rituximab and platinum-based chemotherapy in B-cell lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a phase 1b, dose-escalation, and expansion trial, which enrolled patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Patients received oral selinexor according to a 3 + 3 design in combination with rituximab and dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, oxaliplatine (DHAOX) or gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin (GDP) chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were enrolled, 27 during the escalation phase and 12 during the expansion phase. Most patients had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; 77%). Group R-DHAOX was prematurely closed to inclusion due to a recommendation from the French drug agency, independent of this trial. A recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of selinexor in association with R-GPD was established at 40 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. In a population of 18 patients treated at this dose of selinexor, the most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events were hematological. With this regimen, seven obtained a complete metabolic response and five a partial response. The median PFS was 5.8 months. CONCLUSIONS: Among the patients with R/R B-cell lymphoma, selinexor at a weekly dose of 40 mg with R-GDP is feasible for outpatients, with a generally acceptable safety profile.

Rare case of simultaneous occurrence of chronic neutrophil leukemia and T lymphoblastic lymphoma: case report and literature review.

Chronic neutrophil leukemia (CNL) is a rare and life-threatening disease. Cases of CNL combined with lymphoma are rare. Here, we report a case of CNL with T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (T-ALL/LBL) in a 28-year-old male. After a regimen of ruxolitinib, VICLP (Vincristine, Idarubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Prednisone, Peg-asparaginase) regimen, high-dose cytarabine, and methotrexate regimens, the patient's bone marrow condition partially resolved. However, when the disease relapsed four months later, despite attempts with selinexor, venetoclax, and CAG(aclarubicin hydrochloride, Algocytidine, Granulocyte Stimulating Factor) chemotherapy, the leukocytes and peripheral blood primitive cells reduced, but the bone marrow did not achieve remission. This pathogenesis may be related to microenvironmental immune escape under prolonged inflammatory stimulation and gene disruption affecting protein function due to colony-stimulating factor 3 receptor gene (CSF3R) mutations. For this type of disease, early intervention may delay disease progression.

Unraveling the complexity of drug resistance mechanisms to SINE, T cell-engaging therapies and CELMoDs in multiple myeloma: a comprehensive review.

Despite significant advances in the understanding of multiple myeloma (MM) biology and the development of novel treatment strategies in the last two decades, MM is still an incurable disease. Novel drugs with alternative mechanisms of action, such as selective inhibitors of nuclear export (SINE), modulators of the ubiquitin pathway [cereblon E3 ligase modulatory drugs (CELMoDs)], and T cell redirecting (TCR) therapy, have led to significant improvement in patient outcomes. However, resistance still emerges, posing a major problem for the treatment of myeloma patients. This review summarizes current data on treatment with SINE, TCR therapy, and CELMoDs and explores their mechanism of resistance. Understanding these resistance mechanisms is critical for developing strategies to overcome treatment failure and improve therapeutic outcomes.

Enhanced Antitumor Activity by the Combination of Dasatinib and Selinexor in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Chronic myeloid leukemia is a hematological malignancy characterized by the abnormal proliferation of leukemic cells. Despite significant progress with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as Dasatinib, resistance remains a challenge. The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential of Selinexor, an Exportin-1 inhibitor, to improve TKI effectiveness on CML. METHODS: Human CML cell lines (LAMA84 and K562) were treated with Selinexor, Dasatinib, or their combination. Apoptosis, mitochondrial membrane potential, and mitochondrial mass were assessed using flow cytometry. Real-time RT-PCR was used to evaluate the expression of genes related to mitochondrial function. Western blot and confocal microscopy examined PINK and heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) protein levels. RESULTS: Selinexor induced apoptosis and mitochondrial depolarization in CML cell lines, reducing cell viability. The Dasatinib/Selinexor combination further enhanced cytotoxicity, modified mitochondrial fitness, and downregulated HO-1 nuclear translocation, which has been associated with drug resistance in different models. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this study suggests that Dasatinib/Selinexor could be a promising therapeutic strategy for CML, providing new insights for new targeted therapies.

Engineered nanoparticles as Selinexor drug delivery systems across the cell membrane and related signaling pathways in cancer cells.

In the present work, molecular dynamics simulation is applied to evaluate the drug carrier efficiency of graphene oxide nanoflake (GONF) for loading of Selinexor (SXR) drug as well as the drug delivery by 2D material through the membrane in aqueous solution. In addition, to investigate the adsorption and penetration of drug-nanocarrier complex into the cell membrane, well-tempered metadynamics simulations and steered molecular dynamics (SMD) simulations were performed. Based on the obtained results, it is evident that intermolecular hydrogen bonds (HBs) and π-π interactions play a significant role in expediting the interaction between drug molecules and the graphene oxide (GO) nanosheet, ultimately resulting in the formation of a stable SXR-GO complex. The Lennard-Jones (L-J) energy value for the interaction of SXR with GONF is calculated to be approximately -98.85 kJ/mol. In the SXR-GONF complex system, the dominant interaction between SXR and GONF is attributed to the L-J term, resulting from the formation of a strong π-π interaction between the drug molecules and the substrate surface. Moreover, our simulations show by decreasing the distance of GONF with respect to cell membrane, the interaction energy of GONF-membrane significantly decrease to -1500 kJ/mol resulting in fast diffusion of SXR-GONF complex toward the bilayer surface that is favored opening the way to natural drug nanocapsule.

The effect of selinexor on prostaglandin synthesis in virus-positive Merkel cell carcinoma cell lines.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine skin cancer with high rates of metastasis and mortality. In vitro studies suggest that selinexor (KPT-330), an inhibitor of exportin 1, may be a targeted therapeutic option for MCC. This selective inhibitor prevents the transport of oncogenic mRNA out of the nucleus. Of note, 80% of MCC tumors are integrated with Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV), and virally encoded tumor-antigens, small T (sT) and large T (LT) mRNAs may require an exportin transporter to relocate to the cytoplasm and modulate host tumor-suppressing pathways. To explore selinexor as a targeted therapy for MCC, we examine its ability to inhibit LT and sT antigen expression in vitro and its impact on the prostaglandin synthesis pathway. Protein expression was determined through immunoblotting and quantified by densitometric analysis. Statistical significance was determined with t-test. Treatment of MCPyV-infected cell lines with selinexor resulted in a significant dose-dependent downregulation of key mediators of the prostaglandin synthesis pathway. Given the role of prostaglandin synthesis pathway in MCC, our findings suggest that selinexor, alone or in combination with immunotherapy, could be a promising treatment for MCPyV-infected MCC patients who are resistant to chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of once weekly selinexor 40 mg versus 60 mg with pomalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma.

Objective: To identify the optimal dose of selinexor in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (SPd). Methods: An analysis of efficacy and safety of 2 once-weekly selinexor regimens (60 mg and 40 mg) with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (SPd-60 and SPd-40, respectively) given to patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the STOMP (NCT02343042) and XPORT-MM-028 (NCT04414475) trials. Results: Twenty-eight patients (60.7% males, median age 67.5 years) and 20 patients (35.0% males, median age 65.5 years) were analyzed in the SPd-40 and SPd-60 cohorts, respectively. Overall response rate was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI] 30.6-69.4%) and 65% (95% CI 40.8-84.6%), respectively. Very good partial response or better was reported in 28.6% (95% CI 13.2-48.7%) and 30.0% (95% CI 11.9-54.3%) of patients, respectively. Among 27 responders in both cohorts, the 12-month sustained response rate was 83.3% (95% CI 64.7-100.0%) for SPd-40 and 28.1% (95% CI 8.9-88.8%) for SPd-60. Median progression-free survival was 18.4 months (95% CI 6.5 months, not evaluable [NE]) and 9.5 months (95% CI 7.6 months-NE) for SPd-40 and SPd-60, respectively. Twenty-four-month survival rates were 64.2% (95% CI 47.7-86.3%) for SPd-40 and 51.1% (95% CI 29.9-87.5%) for SPd-60. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included neutropenia (all grades: SPd-40 64.3% versus SPd-60 75.0%), anemia (46.4% versus 65.0%), thrombocytopenia (42.9% versus 45.0%), fatigue (46.4% versus 75.0%), nausea (32.1% versus 70.0%) and diarrhea (28.6% versus 35.0%). Conclusion: The all-oral combination of SPd exhibited preliminary signs of efficacy and was generally tolerable in patients with RRMM. The overall risk-benefit profile favored the SPd-40 regimen.

Impact of prior treatment on selinexor, bortezomib, dexamethasone outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Extended follow-up subgroup analysis of the BOSTON trial.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the impact of prior therapies on outcomes with selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (SVd) versus bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) in 402 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the phase 3 BOSTON trial. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety for lenalidomide-refractory, proteasome inhibitor (PI)-naïve, bortezomib-naïve, and one prior line of therapy (1LOT) patient subgroups. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of over 28 months, clinically meaningful improvements in PFS were noted across all groups with SVd. The median SVd PFS was longer in all subgroups (lenalidomide-refractory: 10.2 vs. 7.1 months, PI-naïve: 29.5 vs. 9.7; bortezomib-naïve: 29.5 vs. 9.7; 1LOT: 21.0 vs. 10.7; p < .05). The lenalidomide-refractory subgroup had longer OS with SVd (26.7 vs. 18.6 months; HR 0.53; p = .015). In all subgroups, overall response and ≥very good partial response rates were higher with SVd. The manageable safety profile of SVd was similar to the overall patient population. CONCLUSIONS: With over 2 years of follow-up, these clinically meaningful outcomes further support the use of SVd in patients who are lenalidomide-refractory, PI-naïve, bortezomib-naïve, or who received 1LOT (including a monoclonal antibody) and underscore the observed synergy between selinexor and bortezomib.

Adverse events reporting of XPO1 inhibitor - selinexor: a real-word analysis from FAERS database.

As the world's first oral nuclear export inhibitor, selinexor is increasingly being used in clinical applications for malignant tumors. However, there is no extensive exploration on selinexor's adverse events (ADEs), necessitating a real-word assessment of its clinical medication safety. FAERS data (July 2019-June 2023) were searched for selinexor ADE reports across all indications. Use the system organ class (SOC) and preferred terms (PT) from the medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA) to describe, categorize, and statistic ADEs. Disproportionality analysis was employed through calculation of reporting odds ratio (ROR) and proportional reporting ratio (PRR). Based on total of 4392 selinexor related ADE reports as the primary suspect (PS), of which 2595 instances were severe outcomes. The predominant ADEs included gastrointestinal disorders, myelosuppression symptoms, and various nonspecific manifestations. 124 signals associated with selinexor ADE were detected, and 10 of these top 15 signals were not included into the instructions. Our study provides real-world evidence regarding the drug safety of selinexor, which is crucial for clinicians to safeguard patients' health.

Dynamic Single-Cell RNA-Seq reveals mechanism of Selinexor-Resistance in Chronic myeloid leukemia.

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a type of hematologic malignancies caused by BCR-ABL chimeric oncogene. Resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) leads to the progression of CML into advanced stages. Selinexor is a small molecule inhibitor that targets a nuclear transporter called Exportin 1. Combined with imatinib, selinexor has been shown to disrupt nuclear-cytoplasmic transport signal of leukemia stem cells, resulting in cell death. The objective of this study was to investigate the mechanism of drug resistance to selinexor in CML. We established K562 cell line resistant to selinexor and conducted single cell dynamic transcriptome sequencing to analyze the heterogeneity within the parental and selinexor resistant cell populations. We identified specific gene expression changes associated with resistance to selinexor. Our results revealed differential expression patterns in genes such as MT2A, TFPI, MTND3, and HMGCS1 in the total RNA, as well as MT-TW, DNAJB1, and HSPB1 in the newly synthesized RNA, between the parental and drug-resistant groups. By applying pseudo-time analysis, we discovered that a specific cluster of cells exhibited characteristics of tumor stem cells. Furthermore, we observed a gradual decrease in the expression of ferroptosis-related molecules as drug resistance developed. In vitro experiments confirmed that the combination of a ferroptosis inducer called RSL3 effectively overcame drug resistance. In conclusion, this study revealed the resistance mechanism of selinexor in CML. In conclusion, we identified a subgroup of CML cells with tumor stem cell properties and demonstrated that ferroptosis inducer improved the efficacy of selinexor in overcoming drug resistance.

Beyond oncology: Selinexor's journey into anti-inflammatory treatment and long-term management.

Selinexor, a selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE), is gaining recognition beyond oncology for its potential in anti-inflammatory therapy. This review elucidates Selinexor's dual action, highlighting its anti-tumor efficacy in various cancers including hematologic malignancies and solid tumors, and its promising anti-inflammatory effects. In cancer treatment, Selinexor has demonstrated benefits as monotherapy and in combination with other therapeutics, particularly in drug-resistant cases. Its role in enhancing the effectiveness of bone marrow transplants has also been noted. Importantly, the drug's impact on key inflammatory pathways provides a new avenue for the management of conditions like sepsis, viral infections including COVID-19, and chronic inflammatory diseases such as Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and Parkinson's Disease. The review emphasizes the criticality of managing Selinexor's side effects through diligent dose optimization and patient monitoring. Given the complexities of its broader applications, extensive research is called upon to validate Selinexor's long-term safety and effectiveness, with a keen focus on its integration into clinical practice for a diverse spectrum of disorders.

Case report: Light-chain amyloidosis responsive to selinexor in combination with daratumumab and dexamethasone (SDd) therapy.

The outcome of AL amyloidosis remains poor, particularly in patients with advanced organ involvement which takes long time to recovery. We conducted an observational study of two patients with AL amyloidosis treated with SDd regimen. Both patients successfully achieved significant hematological and organ responses without severe adverse events, and the time to organ response was remarkably shorter than previously reported. Notably, an over 15% reduction in interventricular septal thickness (IVST) was observed in patient#2 within 6 months. Up to now, SDd therapy has not been previously reported in AL amyloidosis and may be a promising option for these patients.

Selinexor in multiple myeloma.

INTRODUCTION: Selinexor, an XPO1 inhibitor, has emerged as a promising therapeutic option in the challenging landscape of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). AREAS COVERED: This article provides a review of selinexor, with a focus on available clinical studies involving MM patients and its safety profile. Clinical trials, such as STORM and BOSTON, have demonstrated its efficacy, particularly in combination regimens, showcasing notable overall response rates (ORR) and prolonged median progressionfree survival (mPFS). Selinexor's versatility is evident across various combinations, including carfilzomibdexamethasone (XKd), lenalidomidedexamethasone (XRd), and pomalidomidedexamethasone (XPd), with efficacy observed even in tripleclass refractory and highrisk patient populations. However, challenges, including resistance mechanisms and adverse events, necessitate careful management. Realworld evidence also underscores selinexor's effectiveness in RRMM, though dose adjustments and supportive measures remain crucial. Ongoing trials are exploring selinexor in diverse combinations and settings, including pomalidomidenaïve patients and postautologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) maintenance. EXPERT OPINION: The evolving landscape of selinexor's role in the sequencing of treatment for RRMM, its potential in highrisk patients, including those with extramedullary disease, as revealed in the most recent international meetings, and ongoing investigations signal a dynamic era in myeloma therapeutics. Selinexor emerges as a pivotal component in multidrug strategies and innovative combinations.

Efficacy and safety of selinexor for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: A meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Selinexor is a first-in-class, oral selective-inhibitor-of-nuclear-export, granted accelerated approval by FDA (2019) for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We sought to quantitatively summarize the selinexor efficacy and safety in RRMM. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, clinicaltrial.gov, and google scholar, until May 2023, studies about selinexor use in RRMM. The outcome measures of interest were primarily efficacy outcomes, in addition to safety outcomes. Random-effect model analyses were performed, at statistical significance of P<0.05, using the RevMan software. RESULTS: Meta-analyses of eleven included clinical trials yielded a significant 56.21% overall clinical benefit, 46.91% overall response, 4.89% complete response, 23.41% very good partial response, 24.68% partial response, and 28.06% stable disease rates with selinexor. Due to safety reasons, selinexor caused significant increase in discontinuation rate, 16.80%. Subgroup analyses demonstrated higher efficacy with selinexor plus dexamethasone and proteasome inhibitor combinations than with selinexor alone. The multiple myeloma type, high cytogenetic risk, refractory state, and advanced disease state did not affect performance. Risk of selection, performance, and detection biases were unclear in the included trials. CONCLUSION: Selinexor led to significant positive responses with an acceptable safety profile in RRMM patients, despite higher rates of safety-related discontinuations. Selinexor-based combinations further enhanced response.

Efficacy of Selinexor in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Patients with del17p and Other High-Risk Abnormalities (A Retrospective Single-Center Study).

Selinexor (Seli) is a first-in-class, oral selective inhibitor of the nuclear export protein, exportin-1 (XPO1). Seli exhibits its antitumor effect through the blockage of XPO1, which increases nuclear retention of tumor suppressor proteins (TSPs), including p53, thereby limiting the translation of oncogenes, triggering cell cycle arrest and the death of malignant cells. Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients with del17p are deficient in TP53 and have a particularly poor prognosis. Given its unique mechanism of action, we investigated whether Seli has increased efficacy in RRMM patients with del17p compared to other high-risk cytogenetics (OHRC). This is an IRB-approved observational study of RRMM patients with high-risk cytogenetics (del17p, t (4;14), t (14;16) or gain 1q) or standard-risk cytogenetics treated at the Levine Cancer Institute (LCI) with a Seli-based regimen between January 2019 and December 2022. Time-to-event endpoints (PFS, OS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods. Log-rank tests compared time-to-event endpoints between cohorts [del17p vs. OHRC vs. standard risk]. We identified 40 RRMM patients with high-risk cytogenetics, including 16 patients with del17p and 24 patients with OHRC, as well as 20 with standard-risk cytogenetics. The median age was 62.5 vs. 69 vs. 65.5 years (del17p group vs. OHRC vs. standard risk). The median prior line of therapies was five (range: 3-16) with similar rates of prior autologous stem cell transplant in all arms (68.8% vs. 62.5% vs. 70.0%). The most frequently used regimens were Seli-Pomalidomide-dexamethasone(dex) or Seli-Carfilzomib-dex (Seli-Kd) in the del17p group and Seli-Kd in the OHRC and standard-risk groups. The median time to start the Seli-based regimen after initial MM diagnosis was 5.6 years for the del17p group, 4.1 years in OHRC, and 4.8 years in the standard-risk group. The median follow-up time after the start of the Seli-based regimen was 10.5 months (mos) in the del17p group, 8.4 mos in OHRC, and 10.3 mos in the standard-risk group. In the del17p group, 50% had an objective response, 41.7% in the OHRC, and 35% in the standard-risk group (p = 0.71). Depth of response was also similar across the arms (12.5% vs. 12.5% vs. 10.0% VGPR p = 0.99). The median OS was 10.9 mos in the del17p group, 10.3 mos in the OHRC, and 10.3 mos in the standard-risk group (p = 0.92). The median OS was 15.5 mos for patients who received Seli as a bridging therapy versus 9 mos for Seli use for other reasons rather than as a bridge. Overall, Seli-based regimens showed promising responses even in this heavily pretreated population. Our analysis suggests that Seli-based regimens lead to similar outcomes among RRMM patients with del17p, OHRC, and standard-risk cytogenetics. This contrasts with previously reported outcomes using combinations of novel therapies in this population, where the del17p patients often have a poorer prognosis. Interestingly, our data suggest that Seli is a particularly effective bridging modality for patients preparing for CAR-T cell therapies in our population. Further investigation into this population is warranted, including in earlier lines of therapy, in hopes of seeing a more durable response.

Selinexor for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

OBJECTIVE: Multiple myeloma cells resist standard therapies due to overexpression of the transport protein, exportin 1. Selinexor is a novel drug that targets the Exportin 1 protein in these cells. DATA SOURCE: A comprehensive search was done, and data showing the efficacy and safety of selinexor in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma was collected using PubMed, Google Scholar, and clincialtrials.gov. DATA SUMMARY: Results from the clinical trials STORM, BOSTON, and STOMP were included. Parts I and II of the STORM trial revealed a progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.7 and 3.7 months, a median duration of response of 6.2 and 4.4 months, and an overall survival of 7.3 and 8.4 months, respectively. BOSTON trial's SVd arm (selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone) had a median follow-up period of 13.2 months and an mPFS of 13.93 months. The Vd arm (bortezomib and dexamethasone) had a median follow-up duration of 16.5 months and an mPFS of 9.46 months. The STOMP trial is still active and has limited data available. The SKd arm (selinexor, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone) reported an overall response rate of 66.7% in patients with triple refractory multiple myeloma, and 82% in patients with high-risk cytogenetics. The SPd arm (selinexor, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone) shows an overall response rate of 54.30% in pomalidomide naïve-nonrefractory, 35.70% in pomalidomide refractory and 60% in those dosed at RP2D. SRd arm (selinexor, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone) shows an overall response rate of 91.7% in lenalidomide naïve and 12.5% in lenalidomide refractory patients. SVd (selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone) arm reported an overall response rate of 63% in all patients while the SDd arm (selinexor, daratumumab, and dexamethasone) showed an overall response rate of 73%. CONCLUSION: To improve the outcome of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, it is critical to develop new therapies, assess potential therapeutic synergies, and overcome drug resistance by determining the efficacy of multiple myeloma therapies across multiple disease subgroups.