Practical Approach to Reporting Based on the International System for Serous Fluid Cytopathology.

The International System for Serous Fluid Cytopathology (TIS) is intended for reporting cytological specimens from serous cavities: pleural, abdominal and pericardial cavities. TIS is being adopted into practice in cytology laboratories worldwide. In this system, there are six diagnostic categories: non-diagnostic, negative for malignancy, atypia of undetermined significance, suspicious for malignancy, malignant-primary and malignant-secondary. Malignant-primary category almost always implies malignant mesothelioma and malignant-secondary usually refers to metastasis from carcinoma but also to involvement of serous cavity by haematolymphoid and other malignancies. When evaluating effusion cytological specimen adequacy, the factors that must be considered are sample volume, cellular content and cellular preservation. In the diagnostic analysis and interpretation, it is helpful to consider systematically all basic cytomorphological components in a sample. The basic components are architecture, cell populations, cell size, cytoplasm, nuclei and background elements. One important requirement for a successful evaluation of an effusion cytological specimen is sufficient clinical and radiological information in a referral. Clinical information may guide ancillary testing. In the present review, we provide a practical and educational approach to reporting serous effusion cytology based on the TIS.

A Comparative Study of Sodium Alginate and Plasma Thrombin Cell Block in Diagnostic Cytopathology.

Background: Cell block is an indispensable supplement in the practice of cytopathology. The diagnostic utility of cytology specimens is significantly impacted by the capacity to generate sufficient cell blocks obtained from concentrated fluid samples or fine-needle aspiration specimens after routine processing. This routine processing involves getting directed passes to produce a cell block, especially if the cytopathologist believes additional immunocytochemical stains and/or molecular studies would be required. Objective: This study compared two methods of cell block preparation: the sodium alginate (SA) method and the plasma thrombin (PT) method. A comparison was made regarding overall cellularity, morphological preservation, and concealed artifacts. Methodology: This cross-sectional study evaluated 104 serous fluid samples and fine-needle aspirates. Cell blocks were prepared for each sample using the plasma thrombin and sodium alginate technique. The formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cell blocks were subjected to histochemical staining with hematoxylin and eosin, and slides were assessed for cellularity, artifacts, and morphological preservation. Results: The study utilized chi-square tests to analyze cellularity, morphology, and artifact presence, demonstrating significant differences in cellularity and artifacts between the two methods, with the sodium alginate method showing more cellularity and more artifacts, while morphologically, there was no significant difference between the two methods. Conclusion: Our study's findings have practical implications for cytopathologists. We conclude that, compared to plasma thrombin methodology, the sodium alginate cell block technique yields higher cellularity, while there was no difference in morphology. Even though artifacts were more prevalent in sodium alginate cell blocks than in plasma thrombin cell blocks, our study suggests that the former can be a better alternative for cell block examination.

Application of the international system for reporting serous fluid cytopathology on pleural effusion cytology with paired pleural biopsy: A new insight and novel approach on risk of malignancy.

INTRODUCTION: The risk of malignancy (ROM) remains an area of interest for further evaluation in reporting systems including in International System for reporting serous fluid cytopathology (TIS), which is a standardized system for reporting effusion cytology. Herein, we report our findings in further investigation of ROM in TIS by studying on paired pleural effusion specimens and corresponding pleural biopsies with emphasis on negative for malignancy, and atypia of undetermined significance categories. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The  Johns Hopkins Hospital pathology database was retrospectively searched for patients with a pleural biopsy (PBX) and a paired pleural effusion (PF) cytology specimens over a 4-year period. We employed the TIS categories. The following statistical parameters were evaluated: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and ROM. RESULTS: A total of 223 patient cases were included. Effusions TIS reclassification and ROM were as follows: 1.8% non-diagnostic (ROM 75%), 75.8% negative for malignancy (ROM 23%), 4.9% atypical cells of undetermined significance (ROM 45%), 2.2% suspicious for malignancy (ROM 80%), and 15.2% malignant (ROM 100%). Overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were calculated and were 79.4%, 45%, 97.7%, 91.2% and 77%, respectively. Among, discordant cases diagnosed negative for malignancy on PF and positive for malignancy on PBX, there were significant number of lymphomas, mesotheliomas, and sarcomas. Lung cancer was the most common carcinoma; however, rare types of carcinomas were noted. Cells blocks and immunohistochemistry (IHC) studies were utilized to confirm either malignant conditions or rule out malignancy in both cell blocks and histology biopsies. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the high specificity and ROM for 'malignant' and 'suspicious for malignancy' categories in the TIS reporting system and highlights the modest negative predictive value for the 'negative for malignancy' category. Although Tissue biopsies are usually considered as 'gold standard', any definitive diagnosis of malignancy of body fluid should be considered positive for malignancy in further clinical decision-making.

Comparison of Claudin-4, BerEP4, Carcinoembryonic Antigen and MOC31 in Serous Fluids Metastases Demonstrate High Sensitivity of Claudin-4 at Low Cellularity.

INTRODUCTION: Claudin-4 has been described as a highly sensitive immunocytochemical marker for detection of metastatic carcinoma cells in effusion cytology specimens. This study aims to challenge the performance of claudin-4 in different types of malignancies and low cellularity specimens, by comparison with other markers in a large cohort of carcinomatous effusion specimens. METHODOLOGY: Cell block preparations from peritoneal and pleural fluid specimens were retrieved, with malignant (carcinoma) diagnoses confirmed by review of hospital diagnosis code and pathology reports. Claudin-4, BerEP4, CEA, and MOC31 immunocytochemistry were performed and scored by expression proportion and intensity. Tumor cellularity was assessed for subgroup analysis of low cellularity specimens. RESULTS: Totally 147 specimens (70 pleural, 77 peritoneal) of 68 lung, 62 breast, 9 gynecological, and 7 gastrointestinal carcinomas were retrieved. The average proportion expression of claudin-4 was highest (89.6%, vs. CEA 40.5%, BerEp4 18.6%, MOC31 16.8%) and the percentage of strong expression was highest for claudin-4 (72.1%). Expression levels of claudin-4 were consistently higher than other markers in subgroups of all primary sites. The difference was more significant for low cellularity specimens. High (≥50%) proportion expression was seen for 96.61% of cases for claudin-4 (vs. BerEp4 8.77%, CEA 46.55%, MOC31 8.77%, p < 0.001). These factors contributed to a low concordance between claudin-4 and BerEp4, CEA and MOC31 (K = 0.010-0.043). CONCLUSION: Claudin-4 is more sensitive than CEA, BerEp4 and MOC31, suitable for low cellularity specimens of most types of metastatic carcinoma and is a robust immunocytochemical marker for carcinoma that can be used solitarily.

Impact of serous fluid volume on next-generation sequencing: a significant step forward for optimization of serous fluid sample collection.

Current literature lacks data regarding the influence of serous fluid volume (SFV) on next-generation sequencing (NGS) performed on malignant cases. In this study, we highlight the impact of SFV and other parameters influencing the outcome of NGS analysis. We evaluated 827 samples of serous fluids from 607 patients. Of these, 72 samples underwent NGS analysis. Effusion volume, tumor cellularity, DNA, and RNA quality metrics, as well as clinicopathologic and molecular data were evaluated. Pleural fluid accounted for 56.3% of the fluid samples collected. The most common primary tumor site was gastrointestinal/pancreatobiliary, adenocarcinoma was the most common histologic type. Overall mean volume was 293 mL. The mean Qubit DNA of the 72 effusion samples that underwent NGS analysis was 14.3 ng/µL and mean Qubit RNA was 28.2 ng/µL. The mean Qubit DNA concentration increases in SFV up to 100 mL only. No correlation exists between SFV and mean tumor cellularity. In addition, 74.6% (50 of 67) of sequenced samples showed oncogenic drivers; KRAS was the most common driver followed by EGFR. Three cases displayed ALK fusions, and 1 case displayed NTRK1 fusion. The DNA yield is higher in SFV of 100 mL as a cutoff. Beyond 100 mL, there is no impact of SFV on DNA yield. SFV does not impact RNA yield and mean tumor cellularity. Effusion samples should be submitted for molecular testing despite low tumor cellularity. Our results as a pilot study are important in optimization of SFV for both diagnosis as well as NGS analysis for improving management.

Intracerebral hemorrhage with massive milk-like serous fluid: a rare case report.

Computed tomography (CT) scans of acute cerebral hemorrhage are often characterized by high-density imaging with occasional mixed density and low-density imaging features. Possible reasons for this are a lack of blood coagulation, extravasation of cerebrospinal fluid, and brain tissue edema. It is rarely due to the accumulation of lipid components associated with hyperlipidemia. In the present case, preoperative lipid tests and the intraoperative finding of a large amount of milky white fluid surrounding the hematoma confirmed that the low-density imaging surrounding the hematoma visible on the CT scan represented a rare case of lipid accumulation.

Evaluating Diagnostic Clarity: The Comparative Efficacy of BlueStain in Serous Effusion Cytology under the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology Reporting Framework.

Serous effusion cytology is a pivotal diagnostic and staging tool in clinical pathology, valued for its simplicity and cost-effectiveness. Staining techniques such as Giemsa and Papanicolaou are foundational, yet the search for rapid and efficient alternatives continues. Our study assesses the efficacy of an in-house-developed BlueStain, a toluidine blue variant, within the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (TIS), aiming to optimize diagnostic clarity and resource use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This section provides details on the cohort of 237 patients with serous effusions, the ethical approval process, sample collection, and staining procedures with BlueStain, Papanicolaou, and Giemsa. It also describes the microscopic evaluation criteria, scoring system, and statistical methods used to compare the stains. RESULTS: BlueStain demonstrated notable performance, particularly in identifying malignant cells, presenting a competitive alternative to the Papanicolaou stain, which, despite higher quality indices in other categories, requires more resources and time. The study revealed that BlueStain might offer a valuable balance between quality and efficiency, especially in cases where rapid diagnostic turnaround is essential. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that BlueStain is a viable staining method in the context of serous effusions, capable of providing detailed cytomorphological analysis. While traditional stains hold their place for their established diagnostic clarity, BlueStain offers a rapid and resource-optimized alternative. The absence of definitive diagnostic criteria in the atypical category and the inherent sample heterogeneity underscores the necessity for adaptable staining methods like BlueStain. The study highlights the potential trade-offs between detail and practicality in staining techniques, advocating for further research into innovative methods that do not compromise diagnostic precision for cost and time efficiency.

Cytopathological Features of Extensive Bilateral Pleural Effusions in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Report of a Rare Case.

We report a rare case of a 59-year-old male with a history of metastatic prostate cancer presenting with acute onset dyspnea due to extensive bilateral pleural effusions. This case highlights the rarity of metastatic prostate cancer with pleural involvement and underscores the importance of accurate diagnosis using cytopathology and immunohistochemical staining.

Role of Ancillary Techniques in Reporting Serous Fluid Cytology - "Redefining Categories, Refining Diagnosis".

Background: The "International System of Reporting Serous Fluid Cytology (TIS)" together with cytomorphology promotes the use of ancillary techniques to resolve difficulties in reporting serous fluid cytology. Objective: To classify serous effusion fluid samples received at our department in line with "TIS", indicating the risk of malignancy (ROM), and directing appropriate usage of ancillary testing. Materials and Methods: Prospective study carried out from October 2021 to September 2022. The study included all pleural, ascitic, and pericardial fluid samples, reported according to 'TIS'. Flow cytometry and immunocytochemistry were ancillary methods utilized to assist in reporting. Cases with available history and convincing correlations didn't require further assessment. Results: A total of 1200 serous effusion samples were evaluated including 604 pleural, 591 ascitic, and 5 pericardial fluid samples. After categorization, there were 23 samples in non-diagnostic (ND, 1.9%), 575 in negative for malignancy (NFM, 47.91%), 44 in atypia of undetermined significance (AUS, 3.66%), 64 in suspicious for malignancy (SFM, 5.33%), and 494 in malignant category (MAL, 41.16%). Ancillary studies were beneficial in the recategorization of 26% (11/44) AUS cases, 29.6% (19/64) SFM cases, and it helped refine tumor characteristics in 35.42% (175/494) cases categorized as malignant. Final ROM calculated for each category: ND 25%, NFM 18.6%, AUS 66.6%, SFM 88%, and MAL 100%. Conclusion: Serous fluid is an easily obtainable sample that can provide opportunities for ancillary testing with clinical implications. In AUS and suspicious category although, diagnostic yield is increased however, a larger number of cases are required to obtain definite results.

Deciphering Serous Effusions Using the New International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology.

Introduction Serous effusion cytopathology is a minimally invasive, cost-effective procedure and plays a crucial role in diagnosing a spectrum of pathological conditions, ranging from benign to malignant. The International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (ISRSFC) offers a standardized framework for reporting serous effusions, aiding in better communication and clinical decision-making. Aims and objectives This study aimed to categorize effusions using the ISRSFC reporting system. In addition, we sought to estimate the risk of malignancy (ROM) for each diagnostic category and evaluate the diagnostic performance of conventional smear versus cell block techniques. Materials and methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Pathology over one year. We applied the ISRSFC criteria to serous effusions and categorized them accordingly. The ROM for each category was assessed with histopathology serving as the gold standard. Then, the diagnostic performance including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using conventional smear and cell block techniques. Results The study included 185 serous effusion cases, with ages ranging from two months to 85 years. The male-to-female ratio was 1.1:1. Most effusions were pleural fluids constituting about 133 cases (71.9%), followed by peritoneal fluids (47 cases, 25.4%) and pericardial fluids (five cases, 2.7%). Among the fluids, four (2.2%) were diagnosed as non-diagnostic (ND), 152 (82.2%) as negative for malignancy (NFM), four (2.2%) as atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), nine (4.8%) as suspicious for malignancy (SFM), and 16 (8.6%) as malignant (MAL). The overall ROM was 25% for ND, 8.5% for NFM, 50% for AUS, 77% for SFM, and 100% for MAL. The sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy were superior when combining conventional smear with the cell block technique. Conclusions Our findings underscore the use of ISRSFC in categorizing effusion samples, assessing the ROM, and guiding clinical management. Moreover, our study highlights the benefits of employing a combined approach using conventional smears and cell blocks for enhanced diagnostic accuracy in serous effusions.

Optimal Volume Assessment for Serous Fluid Cytology.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the optimal volume of serous fluid needed for accurate diagnosis using The International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (TIS), as well as to provide information on the distribution of serous effusion cases in the TIS categories (ND: non-diagnostic, NFM: negative for malignancy, AUS: atypia of undetermined significance, SFM: suspicious for malignancy, MAL: malignant) and relevant epidemiological data. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 2340 serous effusion cases (pleural, peritoneal, and pericardial) from two hospitals between 2018 and 2020 was conducted. TIS categories were assigned to each case, and for 1181 cases, these were correlated with the volume of the analyzed fluid. RESULTS: Our study found statistically significant differences in volume distributions between certain TIS categories. Statistically lower volumes were observed in NFM compared to MAL, in UNCERTAIN (ND, AUS, SFM) compared to both MAL and NFM, and in NOT MAL (ND, NFM, AUS, SFM) compared to MAL. However, these differences were not substantial enough to hold any clinical relevance. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that while fluid volume may slightly influence the TIS category, it does not impact the diagnostic accuracy of serous effusion cytology. Therefore, the ideal serous effusion specimen volume can be defined solely by practical parameters.

Diagnostic accuracy of International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology: A systematic review and meta-analysis in malignancy diagnosis.

This study conducts the first meta-analysis to assess the aggregated risk of malignancy associated with each category of the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (ISRSFC) for reporting serous effusion cytology, while also evaluating diagnostic accuracy. PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched using the keywords "(pleural, peritoneal, and pericardial effusions) AND (serous effusion cytology) OR (International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology)". Articles underwent risk of bias assessment using the QUADAS-2 tool. After excluding inadequate samples, a meta-analysis determined sensitivity and specificity for different cutoff points, including "atypical considered positive," "suspicious of malignancy considered positive," and "malignant considered positive." Summary receiver operating characteristic curves assessed diagnostic accuracy, and the diagnostic odds ratio was pooled. Sixteen retrospective cross-sectional studies, totaling 19,128 cases, were included. Sensitivity and specificity for the "atypical and higher risk categories" considered positive were 77% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68%-84%) and 95% (95% CI, 93%-97%) respectively. For the "suspicious for malignancy and higher risk categories" considered positive, sensitivity and specificity were 57% (95% CI, 49%-65%) and 100% (95% CI, 99%-100%) respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for the "malignant" category considered positive for malignancy were 70% (95% CI, 60%-77%) and 99% (95% CI, 98%-99%), respectively. The pooled area under the curve ranged from 85% to 89.5% for each cutoff. This meta-analysis underscores the ISRSFC's accuracy in reporting serous fluid cytology. It emphasizes the diagnostic importance of the "suspicious" and "malignant" categories in identifying malignancy, and the role of the "benign" category in ruling out malignancy.

Curious Case of a Giant Retroperitoneal Cyst.

Adrenal cysts are uncommon fluid-filled masses that develop in the adrenal gland. Typically, they are non-functional, asymptomatic, and smaller than 10 cm in diameter when incidentally detected. However, the presence of giant adrenal cysts, exceeding 10 cm in diameter, creates a diagnostic challenge due to the difficulty in determining their origin. Surgical intervention is advised when the cyst surpasses 10 cm in diameter, produces symptoms, causes endocrine abnormalities, exhibits intracystic bleeding, or raises suspicion of malignancy. The preferred treatment approach involves adrenalectomy, performed either through open surgery or laparoscopy. In cases where the diagnosis is unequivocal, ultrasound-guided percutaneous drainage serves as an alternative. Here, we present an exceptional case of a massive retroperitoneal mass caused by a rare giant adrenal cyst.

Comprehensive evaluation of benign and malignant etiologies of different serous effusions with the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology: A multi-institutional study in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: The International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (ISRSFC) was introduced globally in 2019 in response to the absence of a standardized reporting system for serous fluid cytology. This study presents experiences implementing this system across three distinct hospitals in Taiwan. METHODS: A total of 6177 serous fluid specimens in three hospitals in Taiwan between 2018 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed and reclassified according to the ISRSFC. Cytohistological correlation and chart review were further performed to investigate etiologies and risks of malignancy (ROMs). RESULTS: Reclassification showed that 34 (0.7%) of 4838 pleural effusions were nondiagnostic (ND), 4086 (84.5%) were negative for malignancy (NFM), 201 (4.2%) were atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), 92 (1.9%) were suspicious for malignancy (SFM), and 425 (8.8%) were malignant (MAL). The 1231 ascites cases contained 13 (1.1%) ND, 1004 (81.6%) NFM, 53 (4.3%) AUS, 31 (2.5%) SFM, and 130 (10.6%) MAL specimens. In pleural effusions, the ROM was 2.9% for ND, 14.0% for NFM, 52.2% for AUS, 85.9% for SFM, and 95.1% for MAL. In ascites, it was 15.4% for ND, 19.1% for NFM, 52.8% for AUS, 83.9% for SFM, and 92.3% for MAL. In pericardial effusions, it was 0.0% for ND, 11.6% for NFM, 30.8% for AUS, 100.0% for SFM, and 95.2% for MAL. Different effusions' most common benign and malignant etiologies were also disclosed. CONCLUSIONS: These multi-institutional data have determined the diagnostic usefulness of the ISRSFC, which provides pathologists and physicians with invaluable assistance in correctly classifying effusions for further management.

[Serous fluid cytopathology : International system: Ancillary studies for serous fluids and special considerations for peritoneal washings]. / Cytopathologie des séreuses : la classification internationale : À propos des techniques ancillaires prédictives et du cas particulier des lavages péritonéaux.

The International System for serous fluids cytopathology is a cytologic classification which purpose is to establish a consensus on diagnostic terminology. The exponential discovery of prognostic and theranostic molecular alterations in many cancers, particularly in advanced stages, led the authors to describe the indications and the feasibility of these new markers on cytological samples from serous effusions. The various immunocytochemistry techniques, FISH and those testing DNA and RNA are reported in regard to their ability to identify the main targets currently explored in routine practice. The vast majority of these crucial markers can be reliably tested on effusion fluids. The International System for serous effusion fluids also includes a chapter dedicated to peritoneal washings and the application of the classification to this particular type of sample. The objective is to "wash" the peritoneal cavity with a saline solution to unfix cells from the cavity's wall and collect those that have previously naturally detached. This procedure, performed before surgery of tumors and before any manipulation, allows a cytological analysis that specifies the staging of gynecological and non-gynecological tumors and excludes occult malignant cells in the presence of tumors appearing benign.

Optimal fluid volume for detecting malignancy in serous effusions: a single institution experience.

INTRODUCTION: Detection of malignant cells in serous fluids is an indicator of advanced stage of malignancy and is critical in clinical management decisions and prompt treatment initiation. The minimum volume which is ideal for detecting malignancy in serous fluid is not well established. In this study, we aim to identify optimal volume that will be ideal for adequate cytopathological diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1597 samples of serous fluids from 1134 patients were included in the study. Samples were diagnosed based on International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (ISRSFC). Clinicopathologic results from different diagnostic groups were compared and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Pleural fluids comprised 890 (55.7%) specimens, followed by 456 (28.6%) peritoneal, 128 (8%) ascites, and 123 (7.7%) pericardial fluid specimens. The majority were negative for malignancy (1138, 71.3%), followed by malignant (376, 23.5%), atypical (59, 3.7%), and suspicious for malignancy (24, 1.5%). Malignancy was identified in sample with volumes from 5 mL to 5000 mL. Rate of detection of malignant cells increased significantly with higher sample volumes. For malignancy detection the optimal volume for overall serous fluid is 70 mL. Pericardial fluid is an exception, with lower mean volume and significantly lower proportion of cases with malignant diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that higher fluid volumes have a higher rate of malignancy detection and a low false-negative rate. We recommend a minimum of 70 mL of serous fluid for optimal cytopathologic examination and malignancy detection. Pericardial fluid is an exception, with lower mean volume and thus lower requirement.

Application of international system for reporting serous fluid cytology (ISRSFC) in effusion samples-a prospective study in an oncology setting.

INTRODUCTION: Serous fluid cytology is a cost-effective procedure that can help in the diagnosis, staging, and origin of the malignancy. Recently introduced International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytology (ISRSFC) standardizes the reporting of serous fluid cytology in the 5 categories: Category 1: Nondiagnostic (ND), Category 2: negative for malignancy (NFM), Category 3: atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), Category 4: suspicious for malignancy (SFM), and Category 5: malignant (MAL). Here, we present our experience adopting the ISRSFC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We implemented ISRSFC in December of 2019 at our institute and included a cohort of 555 prospective effusion samples. The pertinent surgical pathology, radiology, and clinical follow-up were also extracted to assess the risk of malignancy (ROM) and performance parameters. RESULTS: The assessment of interobserver reliability indicated substantial concordance (κ = 0.717) between the 2 investigators for serous fluid categorization. A total of 555 effusion samples were classified as follows: ND, 14 (2.5%); NFM, 394 (71%); AUS, 12 (2.2%); SFM, 13 (2.3%); and MAL, 122 (22%). The ROM for the ND, NFM, AUS, SFM, and MAL categories was 57.1%, 9.9%, 66.7%, 66.7%, and 97.2%, respectively, in peritoneal effusions and 57.1%, 7.1%, 66.7%, 100%, 100%, respectively, in pleural effusions. The ROM for NFM and MAL was 0% and 100%, respectively, in pericardial effusion. CONCLUSIONS: Application of the proposed ISRSFC can help in achieving uniformity and reproducibility in diagnoses and also help in risk stratification in cytology. ISRSFC was successfully adopted by our cytology laboratory and clinicians, with overall diagnostic performance similar to previous studies.

[Serous fluid cytopathology: International system]. / Cytopathologie des séreuses : la classification internationale.

The International System for Serous Fluid Cytopathology is a cytologic classification which purpose is to establish a consensus on diagnostic terminology. Five diagnostic categories are proposed associated to an increased rate of malignancy and specific cytological criteria. The categories are reported as: (I) Non-diagnostic (ND), the cells are insufficient for interpretation; (II) Negative for malignancy (NFM), only benign cells are present; (III) Atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), the cells present mild atypia more likely to be benign, but a malignant process cannot be definitively excluded; (IV) Suspicious for malignancy (SFM), the cells are present with atypia or in a number suspect of malignancy but with insufficient ancillary studies to give a positive malignant diagnosis; (V) Malignant (MAL), the cytological criteria are absolutely and definitively malignant. Malignant neoplasia can be primitive, it involves mesothelioma and serous lymphoma but most are secondary and correspond mainly to adenocarcinomas in adults and leukemia/lymphoma in children. The diagnostic should always be provided in the appropriate clinical context and be as definitive as possible. The ND, AUS and SFM are temporary or last intention categories. Immunocytochemistry in association with FISH or flow cytometry allow in most cases a conclusive diagnosis. These ancillary studies as well as ADN and ARN tests on effusion's fluids are particularly suited to give reliable theranostic results for personalized therapies.

Application of the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology to pericardial fluid: Root cause analysis of indeterminate diagnoses, cytohistological correlation, and assessment of malignancy risk.

BACKGROUND: This study investigates the utility of the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (ISRSFC) in the categorization of pericardial fluid and assesses the diagnostic performance and risk of malignancy (ROM) for each of the diagnostic categories. METHODS: All pericardial fluid cases at the Yale School of Medicine between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2020, were reviewed. The diagnoses were reclassified into five categories according to the ISRSFC: nondiagnostic (ND), negative for malignancy (NFM), atypia of uncertain significance (AUS), suspicious for malignancy (SFM), and malignant (MAL). ROM and performance parameters of each category were calculated. RESULTS: After reclassification, the distribution of 465 pericardial fluid cases in each category was as follows: ND, 19 (4.1%); NFM, 332 (71.4%); AUS, 21 (4.5%); SFM, 11 (2.4%); and MAL, 82 (17.6%). Confirmatory follow-ups were available for 16 ND (66.7%), 299 NFM (90%), 15 AUS (71%), 5 SFM (45.5%), and 30 MAL cases (36.6%). The ROM was 0% for ND, 1.3% for NFM (4 of 332), 20% for AUS (3 of 15), and 100% for both SFM (5 of 5) and MAL (27 of 27). The diagnostic performance was as follows: sensitivity, 87% (27 of 31); specificity, 100% (292 of 292); positive predictive value (PPV), 100% (27 of 27); negative predictive value (NPV), 98.6% (292 of 296); and diagnostic accuracy, 98.8% (319 of 323). CONCLUSIONS: The ISRSFC is a highly useful system for the reporting of pericardial fluid and risk assessment, given that it offers high sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy. The application of this system may help to better categorize pericardial fluid and facilitate the standardization of cytopathology reporting.

The international system for reporting serous fluid cytopathology: The initial project survey.

OBJECTIVE: An international panel in the field of body fluid cytology, supported by the International Academy of Cytology and the American Society of Cytopathology, conducted a survey to identify opinions and explore existing practice patterns regarding body fluid cytopathology. METHODS: The study group, formed during the 2018 European Congress of Cytology in Madrid, generated a survey of 54 questions related to the practice and taxonomy of body fluid cytology. The survey was available online from 28 August 2018 until 10 December 2018. Participants were invited through the websites and listserves of the professional societies. RESULTS: The survey collected 593 international participant responses. Questions pertained to practice patterns and diagnostic language. Information was collected regarding credentials, work setting, work volume (4-10,000 samples) and years in practice (0-60 years). The responses revealed variations in diagnostic practice and sample management. Direct smears and ThinPrep® preparations are the most popular methods, followed by Cytospin® and SurePath®. Most (70%) respondents perform ancillary studies on their material, with over 50% preferring a cell block preparation. Approximately 32% indicated that they are capable of performing genetic studies on the samples. Nearly 78% of participants would accept a two-stage cytology report, with a preliminary assessment followed by a final diagnosis that accounts for ancillary studies to generate a more precise cytological interpretation. Approximately one-third (36%) never report adequacy on body fluid samples. Most (78%) report a general category result (negative, atypical, suspicious, or positive) and 22% provide a detailed surgical pathology type report. Most (73.6%) participants believe that both Papanicolaou stains and a modified Giemsa stain (eg Diff Quik) should be standard preparations for all serous fluid cytology. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the survey demonstrated strong support for the development of a unified system for reporting body fluid cytopathology among respondents.