Stair climbing interventions reduce postprandial hyperglycemia but not cognitive functions: findings of a randomized cross-over trial.

Prolonged sitting can negatively impact postprandial glucose levels and cognitive functions. Stair climbing interventions have potential to mitigate these risks however remains unexplored. The present study aimed to explore the effects of stair climbing bouts on postprandial glucose and cognitive functions during prolonged sitting. Twenty-eight sedentary young adults (aged 20 - 30 years) underwent two intervention visits after standardized lunch for two hours: (1) STAIR: the participants climbed two flight of stairs for two minutes every 30 minutes; (2) SIT: the participants continued to sit. Blood glucose was measured using capillary finger prick method while attention function was measured using computer-based cognitive tests at baseline, end of 1st hour and 2nd hour. Significant interaction (F2, 54 = 15.96, p <0.001) was observed for conditions and time. During STAIR visit, significant changes in postprandial glucose at 1st hour (ß = - 2.6 mmol/dl, p <0.001) and 2nd hour (ß = 3.0 mmol/dl, p <0.001). No significant difference in the attention functions with time and conditions was observed. Stair climbing interruptions may be a promising solution to prevent high glycemic excursion occurring during prolonged sitting following postprandial sessions. However, the clinical benefits of stair climbing on attention functions remain unconvinced.

The effect of advanced age and stool modification on reaching distance in sitting.

[Purpose] Reaching is an important functional ability. We investigated the effect of advanced age and stool modification on sitting reach distance. [Participants and Methods] Twenty-four participants (twelve older adults 70 ± 4 years and twelve young adults 29 ± 4 years) reached forward and laterally while sitting on an adjustable stool with 0°, 10° forward, 10° backward, 10° right or 10° left inclination of the seat, with and without footrest and front, back or side leg support. [Results] The outcome of this exploratory study revealed that young adults reached farther than older adults across all the directions of reach and seat conditions. While the inclined seat was utilized, both young and older adults reached farthest in the forward direction. Additional leg supports allowed to reach further; however, older adults were not able to reach in the forward direction as far as young adults. When reaching in the lateral direction, leg support had minimal effect on the reach distance. [Conclusion] Age affects the sitting functional reach ability. Future research should focus on investigating the efficiency of interventions to enhance performance of functional tasks in sitting older adults.

Device-measured stationary behaviour and cardiovascular and orthostatic circulatory disease incidence.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have indicated that standing may be beneficially associated with surrogate metabolic markers, whereas more time spent sitting has an adverse association. Studies assessing the dose-response associations of standing, sitting and composite stationary behaviour time with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and orthostatic circulatory disease are scarce and show an unclear picture. OBJECTIVE: To examine associations of daily sitting, standing and stationary time with CVD and orthostatic circulatory disease incidence. METHODS: We used accelerometer data from 83 013 adults (mean age ± standard deviation = 61.3 ± 7.8; female = 55.6%) from the UK Biobank to assess daily time spent sitting and standing. Major CVD was defined as coronary heart disease, heart failure and stroke. Orthostatic circulatory disease was defined as orthostatic hypotension, varicose vein, chronic venous insufficiency and venous ulcers. To estimate the dose-response hazard ratios (HR) we used Cox proportional hazards regression models and restricted cubic splines. The Fine-Gray subdistribution method was used to account for competing risks. RESULTS: During 6.9 (±0.9) years of follow-up, 6829 CVD and 2042 orthostatic circulatory disease events occurred. When stationary time exceeded 12 h/day, orthostatic circulatory disease risk was higher by an average HR (95% confidence interval) of 0.22 (0.16, 0.29) per hour. Every additional hour above 10 h/day of sitting was associated with a 0.26 (0.18, 0.36) higher risk. Standing more than 2 h/day was associated with an 0.11 (0.05, 0.18) higher risk for every additional 30 min/day. For major CVD, when stationary time exceeded 12 h/day, risk was higher by an average of 0.13 (0.10, 0.16) per hour. Sitting time was associated with a 0.15 (0.11, 0.19) higher risk per extra hour. Time spent standing was not associated with major CVD risk. CONCLUSIONS: Time spent standing was not associated with CVD risk but was associated with higher orthostatic circulatory disease risk. Time spent sitting above 10 h/day was associated with both higher orthostatic circulatory disease and major CVD risk. The deleterious associations of overall stationary time were primarily driven by sitting. Collectively, our findings indicate increasing standing time as a prescription may not lower major CVD risk and may lead to higher orthostatic circulatory disease risk.

Cervical osteomyelitis in the setting of multiple comorbidities: a complex anatomical approach. Illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: Vertebral osteomyelitis (VO), also known as spinal osteomyelitis or spondylodiscitis, is a rather rare yet serious disease comprising 3%-5% of all osteomyelitis cases, with only 3%-6% of this subset affecting the cervical spine. Risk factors include an advanced age, diabetes, immunosuppression, and intravenous (IV) drug use. The incidence of VO has increased over recent decades, with high-risk patients experiencing higher mortality rates. Treatment guidelines for VO are not standardized and rely on physician preference, often starting with IV antibiotics and progressing to surgery, if necessary. OBSERVATIONS: A 54-year-old female with tracheostomy-dependent obesity hypoventilation syndrome, hypertension, and morbid obesity presented with upper back pain after a fall. Imaging revealed early C6-7 discitis osteomyelitis, which was initially managed conservatively with IV antibiotics. Her condition worsened, leading to anterior corpectomy of C6-7, followed by posterior cervical fusion from C5 to T2 in the sitting position. This approach was chosen due to the patient's complex anatomy and tracheostomy. LESSONS: This case underscores the need for unique surgical approaches in high-risk patients with complex anatomy. It highlights the importance of interdisciplinary care when managing VO, especially in patients with multiple comorbidities. Given the increasing rates of morbid obesity, this case provides valuable insights for neurosurgical decision-making in similar future cases. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24448.

The effect of trunk control on sitting balance and upper extremity functions in patients with subacute stroke.

BACKGROUND: Impairment of trunk control is a common problem after stroke, and trunk impairment may affect many functions such as breathing, speech, limb movements and transfers. OBJECTIVE: The present study was aimed to investigate the effect of trunk control on sitting balance and upper extremity functions in individuals with subacute stroke. METHODS: A total of 30 patients with subacute stroke (14 female, 16 male) were included in this study. The mean age of the included patients was 59.80 ± 13.22 years, and the mean disease duration was 2.90 ± 1.38 months. Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS), Trunk Control Test (TCT), Function in Sitting Test (FIST), Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Brunnstrom Recovery Stages of Arm (BRS-A) and Brunnstrom Recovery Stages of Hand (BRS-H) were performed to the patients. RESULTS: The results of our study showed that there was a strong positive correlation was found between TIS and FIST (r = 0.765, p < 0.001). There was also a positive moderate correlation between TCT and FIST, FMA-UE, BRS-A and BRS-H (r = 0.67, r = 0.49, r = 0.49, r = 0.44; p < 0.05; respectively). There was a positive moderate correlation between TIS and FMA-UE, BRS-A and BRS-H (r = 0.67, r = 0.65 and r = 0.58; p < 0.005; respectively). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, trunk control has been shown to be a factor associated with sitting balance and upper extremity function in patients with subacute stroke.

Pushing forward: exploring the impact of the sitting position on muscle activation patterns and force generation during paralympic sit-cross-country skiing.

Paralympic cross-country sit-skiing is a discipline of the Paralympic Winter Games where athletes use a specialized sledge. Athletes are classified into different groups according to their functional abilities. The double poling technique is used to push the sledge forward and generate speed. Different sitting positions in the sledge are used based on the individual impairment. To date there is no data available on the effects of these different positions on muscle activation patterns. The aim of this study was to analyze the muscle activation patterns of the trunk and upper body muscles in relation to the poling force. Nine Able-bodied athletes were tested on a treadmill at submaximal speed in three sitting positions for 4 min in a flat and uphill condition. Sitting positions included a "knee-high" position, a "knee-low" position, and a "neutral" position with the sitting platform parallel to the ground. Unilateral pole forces and surface EMG from three trunk muscles, two upper limb muscles, and one lower limb muscle were recorded simultaneously on the dominate side. Data were segmented into individual cycles and mean values and standard deviations calculated for each subject and condition. Statistical analyses, including a Friedman test and Bonferroni correction, were applied to examine significant differences across different sitting positions. Our findings demonstrate that while certain muscle groups such as the erector spinae and triceps show consistent patterns of activation across different sitting positions, there is considerable variability among individual athletes, suggesting individualized strategies for task execution. Overall, force application was most efficient in the "knee low" position with 691.33 ± 148.83 N and least efficient in the "knee high" position with 582.81 ± 115.11 N. Testing impaired athletes will be the next step in understanding the neurophysiological aspects of the poling movement. This experimental protocol provides a basis for understanding the movement of paralympic cross-country sit-skiing in greater depth.

Impact of active breaks on sedentary behavior and perception of productivity in office workers.

Introduction: The increasing prevalence ofsedentary behavior at work, which has been exacerbated by technological advancement and remote work models, can compromise worker health, leading to both physical and mental problems. Increasing research on sedentary behavior has resulted in interventions such as active breaks. Objectives: This study addresses the impact of sedentary behavior at work and the effects of active breaks. Methods: This descriptive-exploratory study with a mixed-methods approach included 70 professionals of both sexes, 86% women (35.2 [SD, 10.2] years) and 14% men (33.5 [SD, 11] years), who worked remotely in administrative roles. The intervention was a 25-week active break protocol involving lectures, a questionnaire, and an app. Results: At the end of the intervention, 64% of participants were taking active breaks. Spending > 10 hours a day in sedentary behavior reduced significantly (from 31% to 14%), as did the proportion of workers who did not exercise (from 43% to 26%; p = 0.002). There were also reductions in post-lunch sleepiness, perceived stress (p < 0.01), and pain/discomfort (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Management programs for sedentary behavior should consider the use of active breaks, since they can reduce sedentary behavior and perceived sleepiness, stress, and pain. This will result in a healthier work environment, increasing employee quality of life as well as company productivity.

Introdução: Com a predominância do sedentarismo ocupacional, agravado pelo avanço tecnológico e pelo trabalho remoto, a saúde dos trabalhadores pode ser comprometida, incluindo problemas físicos e mentais, o que faz com que estudos sobre o comportamento sedentário e intervenções como pausas ativas ganhem destaque. Objetivos: O estudo aborda o impacto do sedentarismo no ambiente de trabalho e a relevância das pausas ativas para mitigar seus efeitos. Métodos: Tratou-se de estudo descritivo-exploratório com abordagem qualiquantitativa, realizado com 70 profissionais de ambos os sexos, 86% mulheres (35,2±10,2 anos) e 14% homens (33,5±11 anos). Todos trabalhavam remotamente em funções administrativas. Os participantes foram orientados a seguir uma rotina de pausas ativas durante 25 semanas. O estudo usou palestras, um questionário e um aplicativo para a prática. Resultados: Dos participantes, 64% adotaram as pausas ativas após a intervenção. Foi observada uma redução significativa no tempo sedentário (superior a 10 horas), de 31 para 14%, e no número de trabalhadores que não se exercitavam, de 43 para 26% (p = 0,002). Notou-se também uma redução na sonolência após o almoço, na percepção do estresse (p < 0,01) e nas dores e/ou desconforto no corpo (p < 0,01). Conclusões: A rotina de pausas ativas parece ser uma estratégia para diminuir o comportamento sedentário e melhorar a percepção quanto a sonolência, estresse e dores. Portanto, a implementação de programas de gestão ativa do comportamento sedentário, por meio de pausas ativas, pode proporcionar um ambiente de trabalho mais produtivo e saudável, beneficiando a qualidade de vida dos funcionários e a produtividade da empresa.

An Analysis of the Effectiveness of Strengthening or Stretching Exercises in Patients Performing Prolonged Sedentary Work with Non-Specific Lower Back Pain.

BACKGROUND: Non-specific LBP refers to back pain which arises from the spine, intervertebral discs and surrounding soft tissues in the absence of pathologic lesions. Most cases of non-specific LBP are not the result of a single injury from a high load, but the result of repetitive, cumulative micro-injuries. The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of strengthening, stretching and mixed exercises in patients with non-specific LBP and their impact on pain intensity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analysed 90 patients with non-specific LBP who performed prolonged sedentary work. Patients were qualified following history-taking, a physical examination and radiological evaluation if no pathology had been revealed on examination or on the available diagnostic imaging scans. The participants were randomly divided into 3 groups of 30 individuals each. The patients in each group performed one type of exercise (strengthening, stretching, mixed) for a period of 3 months. Both before starting and on completion of the exercise period, the patients were assessed with an original questionnaire as well as the Rolland-Morris, Oswestry and SF-12 scoring systems. RESULTS: Strengthening exercises were the most effective in reducing pain; on completion of the exercise period, pain assessed with the NRS scale was 2 points in the strengthening exercise group, 3 points, in the mixed group, and 4 points in the stretching group. The SF-12 questionnaire showed an improvement in the patients' health (increase in "excellent" and "very good" scores from 7% to 60%). According to the Oswestry disability questionnaire, strengthening exercises were the most effective (mean disability score of 4). CONCLUSIONS: 1. The use of strengthening exercises in patients with non-specific LBP most effectively improves function and reduces back pain. 2. The use of stretching and mixed exercises in patients with non-specific LBP improves function and reduces back pain, but to a lesser extent than strengthening exercises.

Retrospective analysis of treatment-positioning accuracy and dose error in boron neutron capture therapy using a sitting-position treatment system for head and neck cancer.

The neutron beam in boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) exhibits poor directionality and significantly decreasing neutron flux with increasing distance. Therefore, the treatment site must be close to the irradiation aperture. Some patients with head and neck cancer may benefit from a sitting-position setup. The study aim was to evaluate the treatment-positioning accuracy and dose error in sitting patients receiving BNCT. Thirty-two patients with head and neck cancer who underwent sitting-position BNCT at Southern Tohoku BNCT Research Center were included in the study. Horizontal (ΔX) and vertical (ΔY) errors were defined as the displacement between the treatment planning system (TPS) digital reconstructed radiograph and the pre-treatment X-ray image. Using in-house software, image matching was performed. The beam-axial directional (ΔZ) error was compared with the parameters entered into the TPS and the actual pre-treatment measured values. The translational-position error was reflected in the TPS's patient coordinate system with respect to the reference plan. Re-dose calculations were performed to evaluate the effect of positional error on tumor and normal-tissue doses. The [ΔX, ΔY, ΔZ] DRR-CR mean ± 1SD were - 0.40 ± 2.0, 0.30 ± 2.3, and - 1.4 ± 1.5 mm, respectively. The Dmean and D98% tumor-dose errors were 1.22 % ± 1.44 % and 0.99 % ± 1.63 %, respectively. The D2% pharyngeal and oral mucosal-dose errors were 0.98 % ± 1.91 % and 1.21 % ± 1.78 %, respectively. The tumor- and normal-tissue dose errors were typically < 5 %. High-precision treatment was feasible in sitting-positioned BNCT.

24-hour movement behavior adherence and associations with health outcomes: an umbrella review.

Background: Physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep, collectively known as the 24-hour movement behaviors, demonstrate individual and joint benefits on physical and mental health. Examination of these behaviors has expanded beyond guideline adherence to reviews of isotemporal substitution models (ISM) and compositional data analysis (CoDA). This umbrella review sought to review existing systematic reviews to (1) characterize the breadth and scope, (2) examine prevalence estimates for 24-hour movement guideline adherence, and (3) examine the relationship between these behaviors with health outcomes based on various approaches. Methods: Eight databases and multiple supplementary strategies were used to identify systematic reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses that included two or more of the three 24-hour movement behaviors and a multi-behavior assessment approach. Overall review characteristics, movement behavior definitions, approaches, and health outcomes assessed were extracted, and methodological quality was assessed using the AMSTAR2 tool. Review characteristics (Aim 1), guideline prevalence estimates (Aim 2), and associations with health outcomes (Aim 3) were examined. Findings: Thirty-two reviews (20 systematic reviews, 10 meta-analyses, and 2 pooled analyses) were included. Reviews captured the entire lifespan, global regions, and several physical and mental health outcomes. Individual and total guideline adherence waned from preschool to adolescence, but reviews reported similar prevalence estimates and ranges (i.e., within 10%). Common approaches included ISM and CoDA, evaluating 24-hour movement behavior's interactive associations with health outcomes, guideline adherence, and profile-based analysis. Despite heterogeneous approaches, reviews found consistent evidence for beneficial associations between meeting all three guidelines and high amount of physical activity on physical and mental health outcomes, but varied assessment of sedentary behavior or sleep. Most reviews were rated as low or critically low quality. Conclusions: The breadth and scope of current reviews on 24-hour movement behaviors was wide and varied in this umbrella review, including all ages and across the globe. Prevalence estimates among populations beyond children need to be synthesized. Amongst the variety of definitions and approaches, reviews found benefit from achieving healthy amounts of all three behaviors. Longitudinal multi-behavior original research studies with rigorous assessment of sleep and sedentary behavior may help improve future systematic reviews of these various approaches. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44167-024-00064-6.

Independent and joint effects of self-reported physical activity and sedentary behaviors on mortality in community-dwelling older persons: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the joint and independent effects of self-reported physical activity and sedentary behavior on mortality in older persons. METHODS: A prospective community-based cohort study was conducted to examine physical activity (PA) level and sitting time (ST) in relation to mortality among 1,786 older persons aged 65 years and above. PA was assessed by a checklist of 26 self-reported items about PA and hours per week, and the metabolic equivalent hours/week was derived, and ST was measured by a self-reported item asking the average number of hours spent sitting per day. The participants were divided into four combination groups of PA and ST based on WHO guideline and values found in literature: high PA/short ST group, high PA/long ST group, low PA/long ST group, and low PA/short ST group. Data on death ascertainment were obtained through linkage with the national death datasets and expanded cardiovascular disease (CVD) included cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. RESULTS: After follow-up for a median 11.1 years, 599 mortality cases were recorded, giving a crude all-cause mortality of 32.5/1,000 person-years, CVD mortality of 8.6/1,000 person-years, expanded CVD mortality of 11.9/1,000 person-years, and nonexpanded CVD mortality of 20.8/1,000 person-years. For all-cause, and expanded CVD, the hazards ratios (HRs) for the low PA/long ST group remained significant compared with that for the high PA/short ST group after all covariates were considered [HRs for all-cause mortality: 1.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1, 1.8]; and expanded CVD mortality: 1.7 (95% CI 1.1, 2.4). CONCLUSIONS: The independent effect of PA and the joint effects of PA and ST are associated with all-cause and expanded CVD death risks. Expanded CVD mortality may be minimized by engaging in PA and reducing sedentary behaviors.

A Scoping Review of Acute Sedentary Behaviour Studies of People with Spinal Cord Injury.

People with a spinal cord injury (SCI) report less physical activity than other populations and may engage in more sedentary behaviour (SB), especially sitting time. SB negatively impacts physiological and psychosocial outcomes in the general population, yet minimal research has explored the effects in people with SCI. The goal of this scoping review was to catalogue and describe the effects of acute SB among people with SCI. We searched four databases before February 2024 for studies in which people with any SCI sat, laid, or reclined for more than one hour in a day, and any physiological, psychological, or behavioural (i.e., SB time) outcome was measured. In total, 2021 abstracts were screened, and eight studies were included (n = 172 participants). The studies were characterized by varied definitions, manipulations, and measures of SB. Most measured outcomes were physiological (e.g., metabolic, blood pressure), followed by behavioural (e.g., SB time) and psychological (e.g., well-being, affect). When SB was interrupted, only postprandial glucose and affect improved. Based on two studies, participants engaged in 1.6 to 12.2 h of SB per day. Average uninterrupted wheelchair sitting bouts lasted 2.3 h. Based on the very limited body of research, it is impossible to draw any conclusions regarding the nature, extent, or impact of SB in people with SCI. There is much work to carry out to define SB, test its effects, and determine if and how people with SCI should reduce and interrupt SB.

Effectiveness of a dynamic seat cushion on recovery and recurrence of neck and low back pain in office workers: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Neck and low back pain are prevalent issues among office workers due to prolonged sitting, necessitating effective interventions. Dynamic seat cushion, designed to promote postural shifts, have emerged as promising solutions to address this concern. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a dynamic seat cushion on recovery and recurrence of neck and/or low back pain in office workers. METHODS: This study used 6-month follow-up data of a randomized controlled trial, involving 66 office workers who reported neck and/or low back pain during the trial. At baseline, participants were cluster-randomized into an intervention group, which received a dynamic seat cushion designed to encourage postural shifts, or a control group, which received a placebo seat pad. Health outcomes included recovery duration and recurrence of pain. Analyses utilized log rank test and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: The recovery rate from neck and/or low back pain was 100% for the intervention group, and 86% for the control group. The median recovery duration of participants who reported pain during the 6-month period was 1 month in the intervention group and 3 months in the control group. The intervention group had a higher probability of recovery compared to the control group (HRadj 4.35, 95% CI 1.87-10.11; p < 0.01). The recurrence rate of neck and low back pain was 27% in the intervention group, which was 75% in the control group. The Hazard Ratio, after adjustment, for the intervention group compared to the control group was 0.50 (95% CI = 0.11-2.12). CONCLUSIONS: A dynamic seat cushion that encourages postural shifts shortened recovery duration of neck and low back pain among office workers. Due to small numbers, a potentially relevant reduction in the recurrence of neck and low back pain could not be statistically confirmed. A power analysis was not conducted for this secondary analysis, and future studies should be designed with adequate sample sizes to explore the recurrence of pain with greater statistical power. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is retrospectively registered under the Thai Clinical Trials Registry: TCTR20230623002 (23/06/2023).

Right-to-left-shunts in patients scheduled for neurosurgical intervention in semi-sitting position - a literature review based on two case scenarios.

BACKGROUND: Neurosurgery performed in the semi-sitting position provides advantages for certain procedures. However, this approach is associated with potential complications, particularly venous air embolism. Due to typically negative venous pressure at the wound site, air can be drawn into the veins. This risk is especially high in patients presenting with an intra- or extracardiac right-to-left-shunt. Transoesophageal echocardiography can be used to detect a patent foramen ovale or other possible pulmonary-systemic shunt before placing the patient in the sitting position. CASE PRESENTATION: In this report, we present two young patients undergoing scheduled microsurgical vestibular schwannoma removal in a semi-sitting position who were diagnosed with congenital heart defects during routine perioperative assessment to detect possible intracardiac right-to-left shunts, using pre- and intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and additionally conducting an agitated saline bubble study under Valsalva manoeuvre. Patient A was diagnosed with a persistent left superior vena cava and Patient B with an unroofed coronary sinus (UCS). These findings confronted the anesthesiological and surgical teams with difficult individual decisions regarding further perioperative management. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative transesophageal echocardiography is a diagnostic tool to both detect intraoperative position-related air embolisms and to rule out intracardiac right-to-left shunts, e.g. a patent foramen ovale, in order to decide for or against a (semi-)sitting position. Depending on the surgical circumstances a semi-sitting positioning of patients presenting with an intracardiac right-to-left-shunt, e.g. a PFO, can be feasible in individual cases if there is an implemented therapeutic algorithm to immediately terminate significant venous air entry. However, since certain other intra- or extracardiac right-to-left-shunts, such as here presented PLSVC or UCS, are rare, there is no definitive way of estimating the amount of entered air through detected shunts or anomalous vessels. Therefore, it is recommended to avoid a (semi-)sitting position in favour of a lateral or prone position for a patient undergoing intracranial surgery, once the perioperative TEE shows air bubbles in the left atrium or ventricle whose origins cannot be defined solely through TEE for certain in order to ensure patient safety by minimizing the risk of intraoperative paradoxical air embolisms.

Excessive occupational sitting increases risk of cardiovascular events among working individuals with type 1 diabetes in the prospective Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy Study.

BACKGROUND: Sedentary behavior, such as excessive sitting, increases risk of cardiovascular disease and premature mortality in the general population, but this has not been assessed in type 1 diabetes. Occupational sitting is increasingly ubiquitous and often constitutes the largest portion of daily sitting time. Our aim was to identify clinical factors associated with excessive occupational sitting in type 1 diabetes and, in a prospective setting, to explore its association with cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality, independent of leisure-time physical activity. METHODS: An observational follow-up study of 1,704 individuals (mean age 38.9 ± 10.1 years) from the Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy Study. Excessive occupational sitting, defined as ≥ 6 h of daily workplace sitting, was assessed using a validated self-report questionnaire. Data on cardiovascular events and mortality were retrieved from national registries. Multivariable logistic regression identified independently associated factors, while Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used for prospective analyses. RESULTS: Factors independently and positively associated with excessive occupational sitting included a high occupational category [OR 6.53, 95% CI (4.09‒10.40)] and older age [1.02 (1.00‒1.03)], whereas negatively associated factors included current smoking [0.68 (0.50‒0.92)], moderate albuminuria [0.55 (0.38‒0.80)], and high leisure-time physical activity [0.52 (0.36‒0.74)]. During a median follow-up of 12.5 (6.5-16.4) years, 163 individuals (9.6%) suffered cardiovascular events, and during a median follow-up of 13.7 (9.4-16.6) years, 108 (6.3%) deaths occurred. Excessive occupational sitting increased cardiovascular event risk (hazard ratio [HR] 1.55 [95% CI 1.10‒2.18]) after adjustment for confounders and other covariates. Furthermore, in a stratified multivariable analysis among current smokers, excessive occupational sitting increased the risk of all-cause mortality (2.06 [1.02‒4.20]). CONCLUSIONS: Excessive occupational sitting is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in individuals with type 1 diabetes. This association persists regardless of leisure-time physical activity, after adjusting for independently associated variables identified in our cross-sectional analyses. These findings underscore the need to update physical activity guidelines to better address sedentary behavior and improve outcomes for individuals with type 1 diabetes. Targeting occupational sitting should be considered a key focus for interventions aimed at reducing overall sedentary time.

National implementation trial of BeUpstanding™: an online initiative for workers to sit less and move more.

BACKGROUND: The online BeUpstanding™ program is an eight-week workplace-delivered intervention for desk-based workers to raise awareness of the benefits of sitting less and moving more and build a supportive culture for change. A workplace representative (the "champion") delivers the program, which includes a workshop where teams collectively choose their sit less/move more strategies. A toolkit provides the champion with a step-by-step guide and associated resources to support program uptake, delivery, and evaluation. Here we report on the main findings from the Australian national implementation trial of BeUpstanding. METHODS: Recruitment (12/06/2019 to 30/09/2021) was supported by five policy and practice partners, with desk-based work teams from across Australia targeted. Effectiveness was measured via a single arm, repeated-measures trial. Data were collected via online surveys, toolkit analytics, and telephone calls with champions. The RE-AIM framework guided evaluation, with adoption/reach (number and characteristics); effectiveness (primary: self-reported workplace sitting time); implementation (completion of core components; costs); and, maintenance intentions reported here. Linear mixed models, correcting for cluster, were used for effectiveness, with reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance outcomes described. RESULTS: Of the 1640 website users who signed-up to BeUpstanding during the recruitment period, 233 were eligible, 198 (85%) provided preliminary consent, and 118 (50.6%) champions consented and started the trial, with 94% (n = 111 champions) completing. Trial participation was from across Australia and across industries, and reached 2,761 staff, with 2,248 participating in the staff survey(s): 65% female; 64% university educated; 17% from a non-English speaking background. The program effectively changed workplace sitting (-38.5 [95%CI -46.0 to -28.7] minutes/8-hour workday) and all outcomes targeted by BeUpstanding (behaviours and culture), with small-to-moderate statistically-significant effects observed. All participating teams (n = 94) completed at least 5/7 core steps; 72.4% completed all seven. Most champions spent $0 (72%) or >$0-$5 (10%) per team member; most (67/70 96%) intended to continue or repeat the program. CONCLUSIONS: BeUpstanding can be adopted and successfully implemented by a range of workplaces, reach a diversity of staff, and be effective at creating a supportive culture for teams of desk-based workers to sit less and move more. Learnings will inform optimisation of the program for longer-term sustainability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12617000682347.

Comparison of Measurements for Recording Postural Control in Standing and Seated Position in Healthy Individuals.

Background: A standard method of assessing postural control is to measure while standing. However, its implementation is usually limited. Recording postural control directly on the trunk in a seated position could provide an alternative diagnostic method for quantifying neuromuscular control. Methods: A comparison of center of pressure (CoP) measurements in the standing and sitting positions was performed on 66 healthy adult subjects. The reliability of the measurements in the sitting position was tested in 23 subjects. In addition, the extension force of all test subjects was recorded. Results: The assessments of CoP fluctuations in standing and seated positions showed adequate agreement (deviation 9.1%). Furthermore, good internal consistencies with a sufficient test-retest reliability could be demonstrated for the measurements in seated position. Both CoP measurement methods showed a comparable Spearman correlation to obtained extension force measurements (standing: 0.24, seated: 0.23). Conclusions: Our results show that recording CoP fluctuations in the sitting position is a reliable and valid adjunct to single-leg stance measurements. It could serve as an additional alternative to quantify neuromuscular control in impaired patients who cannot adequately perform the single-leg stance. In addition, measurement in the seated position allows direct recording of neuromuscular control at the trunk.

Influence of chair seat forward tilt angle on upper limb dexterity improvement in seated tasks: a pilot study.

[Purpose] This study aimed to investigate the influence of seat-forward tilt angles on improving upper limb dexterity in seated tasks and to contribute to the development of seating strategies. [Participants and Methods] Seventeen healthy men (age, 20.0 ± 0.5 years; height, 175.1 ± 4.9 cm; and body weight, 63.8 ± 6.7 kg) participated in this study. The forward tilt angles of the seat were set at 0°, 15°, and 30°, with knee pads used in all conditions. The Purdue Pegboard task was used to assess upper limb dexterity, with participants inserting pins into holes in the board for 60 s. Additionally, a visual analog scale was used to evaluate the perceived ease of the task. [Results] The Purdue Pegboard task scores were 30.0 ± 2.5, 30.6 ± 2.7, and 32.5 ± 2.9 for the 0°, 15°, and 30° conditions, respectively. The visual analog scale scores were 75.3 ± 9.8, 76.4 ± 14.6, and 84.1 ± 11.1 for the 0°, 15°, and 30° conditions, respectively. Both measurements showed significantly higher values under the 30° condition than under the other two conditions. [Conclusion] These results suggest that a tilt angle of 30° provides the most significant ease and upper limb dexterity.

Effects of the wheelchair sitting posture on gluteal pressure.

[Purpose] To evaluate the efficacy of the "forward-tilting posture" (the trunk tilted forward against a table) in a wheelchair in relieving gluteal pressure. [Participants and Methods] Thirty-six healthy adults were instructed to sit in a wheelchair assuming the following three postures: (1) both feet placed on the foot support with the trunk upright ("basic sitting posture"), (2) both feet placed on the foot support with the trunk tilted forward against a table ("forward-tilting posture A"), and (3) both feet placed on the floor with the trunk tilted forward against a table ("forward-tilting posture B"). A seat-type sensor pad placed on a wheelchair cushion was used to measure the maximum gluteal pressure and gluteal contact area. [Results] The maximum gluteal pressures in "forward-tilting postures A" and "forward-tilting postures B" were significantly lower than those in the basic sitting posture. The maximum gluteal pressure in "forward-tilting posture B" was significantly lower than that in "forward-tilting posture A". The gluteal contact area in "forward-tilting posture B" was significantly larger than that in "forward-tilting posture A". [Conclusion] The study results indicate that the "forward-tilting posture" in a wheelchair effectively relieves gluteal pressure.

Effect of Sitting Baduanjin exercise on early rehabilitation of sepsis patients with non-invasive ventilation : a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: For patients with sepsis receiving non-invasive ventilation (NIV), early rehabilitation is crucial. The Sitting Baduanjin (SBE) is an efficient early rehabilitation exercise suitable for bed patients. There is no consensus about the effect of SBE on the early rehabilitation of septic patients with NIV. This study focused on how the SBE affected the early rehabilitation of sepsis patients with NIV. METHODS: 96 sepsis patients with NIV were randomly assigned to either an Baduanjin group that received the SBE based on the routine rehabilitation exercise (n = 48) or a control group (n = 48) that received routine rehabilitation exercise. The primary outcome was the Medical Research Council(MRC)score, and the Barthel Index score, the duration of NIV, length of ICU stay, length of total stay, hospitalization expense as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 245 sepsis patients were screened, with 96 randomly assigned. The study was completed by 90 patients out of the 96 participants.Results revealed that the MRC score increased in both groups, but the improvement of muscle strength in Baduanjin group was more obvious, with statistical significance (p < 0.001).There was statistically significantly difference between the two groups in Barthel Index at the day of transfer out of ICU(P = 0.028).The patients in the Baduanjin group had an average reduction of 24.09 h in the duration of NIV and 3.35 days in total length of hospital stay compared with the control group (p < 0.05).Of note, the Baduanjin group had significantly reduction the total hospitalization expense. No serious adverse events occurred during the intervention period. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with sepsis, the SBE appears to improve muscle strength and activities of daily living (ADL), and lowed the duration of NIV, the length of the total stay, and the hospitalization expense. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( www.chictr.org.cn ), Clinical Trials identifier ChiCTR1800015011 (28/02/2018).