Rescue extracranial vertebral stenting in tandem occlusions: A preliminary Vietnamese study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The acute vertebrobasilar occlusion associated with the poor prognosis, particularly tandem occlusion. However, few data on the efficacy of the endovascular therapy was indicated in this occlusion. We investigated whether the additional rescue extracranial vertebral stenting improved clinical outcome by modified Rankin scale (mRS) score within 3 months after the procedure. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of patients with acute posterior tandem occlusion who were treated with rescue extracranial vertebral stenting between December 2020 and January 2024 at our hospital. Clinical, neuroimaging, procedural, and complication data were collected. Primary outcomes included the rate of good outcomes (mRS ≤ 2) at 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Nine patients who underwent rescue extracranial vertebral stenting in posterior circulation tandem occlusions were enrolled in the study. All patients were achieved the successful recanalization (mTICI ≥ 2b). Of Dotter technique in the "distal-to-proximal" approach, Diagnostic-Dotter made up 66.7%. Five patients (55.6%) with good outcome (mRS ≤ 2) at 3 months, and 1 patient (11.1%) underwent suboccipital decompressive craniectomy due to the malignant cerebellar infarction. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that despite the small series with posterior tandem occlusions, the rescue extracranial vertebral stenting could be an important alternative treatment followed by mechanical thrombectomy.

Dosimetric characteristics of self-expandable metallic and plastic stents for transpapillary biliary decompression in external beam radiotherapy.

There is little evidence regarding radiation dose perturbation caused by the self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) used for transpapillary biliary decompression. We aimed to compare SEMSs with plastic stents (PSs) and clarify their dosimetric characteristics. Fifteen SEMSs (10 braided and 5 lasercut type) and six PSs (diameter: 2.3-3.3 mm) were inserted into a water-equivalent solid phantom. In total, 13 SEMSs had radiopaque markers, whereas the other two did not. Using radiochromic films, the dose difference adjacent to the stents at locations proximal, distal, and arc delivery to the radiation source was evaluated based on comparison to measurement of the dose delivery in phantom without any stent in place. The median values of the dose difference for each stent were used to compare the SEMS and PS groups.Results: The dose difference (median (minimum/maximum)) was as follows: proximal, SEMSs + 2.1% (1.8 / 4.7) / PSs + 5.4% (4.1 / 6.3) (p < 0.001); distal, SEMSs -1.0% (-1.6 /-0.4) / PSs -8.9% (-11.7 / -7.4) (p < 0.001); arc delivery, SEMSs 1.2% (0.9 / 2.3) / PSs 2.2% (1.6 / 3.6) (p = 0.005). These results demonstrated that the dose differences of SEMSs were significantly smaller than those of PSs. On the other hand, the dose difference was large at surface of the radiopaque markers for SEMSs: proximal, 10.3% (7.2 / 20.9); distal, -8.4% (-16.3 / -4.2); arc delivery, 5.5% (4.2 / 9.2). SEMSs for biliary decompression can be safely used in patients undergoing radiotherapy, by focusing on the dose distribution around the stents and by paying attention to local changes in the dose distribution of radiopaque markers.

Efficacy of different stent types in post-liver-transplant anastomotic biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Stent selection in the endoscopic management of post-liver-transplant anastomotic biliary strictures remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the potential differences between available stents. Methods: MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Scopus databases were searched until April 2023 for comparative studies evaluating stricture management using multiple plastic stents (MPS) and self-expandable metal stents (SEMS), including fully-covered (FC)- and intraductal (ID)-SEMS. The primary outcome was stricture resolution, while secondary outcomes included stricture recurrence, stent migration and adverse events. Meta-analyses were based on a random-effects model and the results were reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup analyses by type of metal stent and a cost-effectiveness analysis were also performed. Results: Nine studies (687 patients) were finally included. Considering stricture resolution, SEMS and MPS did not differ significantly (OR 0.99, 95%CI 0.48-2.01; I 2=35%). Stricture recurrence, migration rates and adverse events were also comparable (OR 1.71, 95%CI 0.87-3.38; I 2=55%, OR 0.73, 95%CI 0.32-1.68; I 2=56%, and OR 1.47, 95%CI 0.89-2.43; I 2=24%, respectively). In the subgroup analysis, stricture resolution and recurrence rates did not differ for ID-SEMS vs. MPS or FC-SEMS vs. MPS. Migration rates were lower for ID-SEMS compared to MPS (OR 0.28, 95%CI 0.11-0.70; I 2=0%), and complication rates were higher after FC-SEMS compared to MPS (OR 1.76, 95%CI 1.06-2.93; I 2=0%). Finally, ID-SEMS were the most cost-effective approach, with the lowest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio: 3447.6 £/QALY. Conclusion: Stent type did not affect stricture resolution and recurrence; however, ID-SEMS placement was the most cost-effective approach compared to the alternatives.

Comparison of Drug-Coated Balloons With Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

In-stent restenosis (ISR) is the gradual narrowing of the stented coronary segment, presenting as angina or leading to an acute myocardial infarction. Although its incidence has decreased with the use of newer drug-eluting stents (DES), it still carries significant mortality and morbidity risks. We compared the 2 most common interventions for managing DES-related ISR: drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and DES. Electronic databases were searched to identify all randomized controlled trials comparing DCB with DES in patients with DES-ISR. The Mantel-Haenszel method with a random-effects model was used to calculate pooled risk ratios. Five trials comprising 1,100 patients (577 in DCB and 523 in DES group) were included in the final study. The mean follow-up was 42 months. DCB was found to have a higher risk for target lesion revascularization (risk ratio 1.41, p = 0.02) compared with DES. No difference was observed in all-cause mortality, target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction, or stroke between the 2 intervention arms. In conclusion, management of DES-ISR with DCB has a higher risk of target lesion revascularization compared with re-stenting with DES. The 2 therapeutic interventions are comparable in terms of efficacy and safety profile.

Obstructing colorectal cancer: a population-based review of colonic stenting in Queensland, Australia.

PURPOSE: Stenting is a useful treatment option for malignant colonic obstruction, but its role remains unclear. This study was designed to establish how stents have been used in Queensland, Australia, and to review outcomes. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer in Queensland from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2014, who underwent colonic stent insertion were reviewed. Primary outcomes of 5-year survival, 30-day mortality, and overall length of survival were calculated. The secondary outcomes included patient and tumor factors, and stoma rates. RESULTS: In total, 319 patients were included, and distant metastases were identified in 183 patients (57.4%). The 30-day mortality rate was 6.6% (n=21), and the 5-year survival was 11.9% (n=38). Median survival was 11 months (interquartile range, 4-27 months). A further operation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.19; P<0.001) and chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (HR, 0.718; P=0.046) reduced the risk of 5-year mortality. The presence of distant metastases (HR, 2.052; P<0.001) and a comorbidity score of 3 or more (HR, 1.572; P=0.20) increased mortality. Surgery was associated with a reduced risk of mortality even in patients with metastatic disease (HR, 0.14; P<0.001). Twenty-two patients (6.9%) ended the study period with a stoma. CONCLUSION: Colorectal stenting was used in Queensland in several diverse scenarios, in both localized and metastatic disease. Surgery had a survival advantage, even in patients with metastatic disease. There was no survival difference according to whether patients were socioeconomically disadvantaged, diagnosed in a major city or not, or treated at private or public hospitals. Stenting proved a valid treatment option with low stoma rates.

Meta-long Papyrus: Meta-analysis of mid to long-term outcomes of PK Papyrus covered stent.

BACKGROUND: Although covered stents (CS) represent a potentially life-saving intervention for coronary perforation (CAP), their application has expanded to other contexts, including coronary aneurysms (CAA). However, data regarding mid- and long-term outcomes of CS in these settings scenarios remains limited. AIMS: This meta-analysis aims to evaluate major adverse cardiac events (MACE) from discharge through long-term follow-up in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with the new generation polyurethane-covered cobalt-chromium PK Papyrus CS. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of data from three observational trials that included long-term follow-up of patients who underwent PK Papyrus CS implantation: Papyrus-Spain, SOS PK Papyrus, and PAST-PERF registry. RESULTS: 332 patients underwent PK Papyrus CS implantation, 236 (71.1%) for CAP, 70 (21.1%) for CAA and 26 (7.8%) for other indications. After a mean follow-up of 16.2 months, the MACE was 14.3%, with Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) being the most frequent (8.5%), followed by stent thrombosis (ST), 3.3% and cardiac death (CD), 2.6%. Comparing CAP and CAA subgroups, the MACE rate in CAA was significantly higher than CAP (21.4% vs 9.7%, p < 0.01), primary driven by ST (CAA: 8.6% vs CAP: 1.3%; p = 0.0015). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical outcomes following PK Papyrus CS implantation are deemed acceptable, considering the challenging scenarios and the existing alternative treatments. However, MACE rates in patients with CAA who received Papyrus PK CS were significantly higher than in those with CAP, underscoring the importance of meticulous patient selection and optimization of CS in these complex patients and coronary anatomies.

Consensus Statement on the Management of Nonthrombotic Iliac Vein Lesions From the VIVA Foundation, the American Venous Forum, and the American Vein and Lymphatic Society.

A nonthrombotic iliac vein lesion is defined as the extrinsic compression of the iliac vein. Symptoms of lower extremity chronic venous insufficiency or pelvic venous disease can develop secondary to nonthrombotic iliac vein lesion. Anatomic compression has been observed in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Causative factors that lead to symptomatic manifestations remain unclear. To provide guidance for providers treating patients with nonthrombotic iliac vein lesion, the VIVA Foundation convened a multidisciplinary group of leaders in venous disease management with representatives from the American Venous Forum and the American Vein and Lymphatic Society. Consensus statements regarding nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions were drafted by the participants to address patient selection, imaging for diagnosis, technical considerations for stent placement, postprocedure management, and future research/educational needs.

Advances in self-expandable metal stents for endoscopic ultrasound-guided interventions.

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided interventions have evolved rapidly in recent years, with dedicated metal stents playing a crucial role in this process. Specifically, the invention of biflanged short metal-covered stents, including lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS), and modifications in a variety of tubular self-expandable metal stents (SEMS), have led to innovations in EUS-guided interventions. LAMS or non-LAMS stents are commonly used in the EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections, especially in cases of walled-off necrosis. Additionally, LAMS is commonly considered for drainage of the EUS-guided gallbladder or dilated common bile duct and EUS-guided gastroenterostomy. Fully or partially covered tubular SEMS with several new designs are being considered for EUS-guided biliary drainage. This review focuses on advances in SEMS for EUS-guided interventions and discusses related research results.

Polymer-free stents for percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aim: To compare the efficacy of polymer-free drug-eluting stents (PF-DES) versus other stents in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. Materials & methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to identify pertinent randomized controlled trials. The primary end point was the occurrence of target lesion failure. Results: Eight randomized controlled trials were included for a total of 4854 subjects. The PF-DES group experienced a trend in favor of a lower rate of target lesion failure (Incidence rate ratio = 0.91; p = 0.11) and a significantly lower rate of cardiac mortality, as compared with the control group (Incidence rate ratio = 0.82; p = 0.04). However, statistical significance was lost if bare-metal stent patients were excluded and a trend in favor of the PF-DES strategy was reported only for cardiac mortality. Conclusion: PF-DES could be a valuable strategy in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.

What is this summary about? Polymer-free drug-eluting stents (PF-DES) are a novel type of coronary stent with potential benefits in terms of chronic coronary inflammation. This is a comprehensive, up-to-date, systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of PF-DES versus other stents in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.What were the results? Patients treated with PF-DES experienced similar prognosis, with a trend toward better outcomes, as compared with conventional stents.What do the results mean? PF-DES could represent a novel and effective strategy for treating coronary artery disease in diabetic patients.

Sustained Intraprocedural Cardiac Arrest During BASILICA TAVR.

The bioprosthetic or native aortic scallop intentional laceration to prevent iatrogenic coronary artery obstruction (BASILICA) procedure allows patients with severe aortic stenosis and anatomical challenges from aortic leaflet orientation, positioning of coronary ostia, and height of sinuses of Valsalva to undergo TAVR. We present a case of intraprocedural cardiac arrest secondary to iatrogenic left main coronary artery obstruction following a successful BASILICA procedure.

Selective iliofemoral stent placement for complex pediatric cases: a decade of institutional experience.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric iliofemoral venous thromboembolism that is resistant to conventional treatments poses significant management challenges. Stent placement represents a potentially underutilized strategy in children when stenosis or thrombosis persists intraprocedurally or recurs postoperatively, despite treatments such as venoplasty, lysis, and thrombectomy. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to report our institutional experience with iliofemoral stenting in 17 pediatric patients with recurrent iliofemoral venous thromboembolism or stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an IRB-approved retrospective review of pediatric patients (<18 years of age) who underwent iliofemoral venous stenting for recurrent stenosis or thrombosis between January 2012 and December 2022 at a single tertiary care institution. Patient demographics, risk factors for venous thromboembolism, presenting symptoms, and procedural characteristics were recorded. The primary outcome was stent patency rates at interval imaging follow-up. RESULTS: Seventeen patients with mean age of 14.6 years (range 7-17) and mean BMI of 27.7 were stented during the study period. Sixteen of 17 patients presented with evidence of May-Thurner anatomy. 14/17 patients presented with acute iliofemoral venous thromboembolism, 2/17 with chronic venous thromboembolism, and 1/17 with left lower extremity swelling without thrombosis. Seventy-three total angiographic procedures were performed, which included angioplasty, lysis, and thrombectomy, and 23 stent placements. Patients underwent an average of 3 procedures (range 1-9) over a mean of 2.8 months (range 0-17 months) prior to undergoing stent placement. Stents were deployed successfully in all patients. The median follow-up was 18 months (range, 1-77 months). Primary and secondary patency rates were 13/17 (76%) and 14/14 (100%) at 12 months and 12/17 (71%) and 14/14 (100%) at 24 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: In our experience of 17 patients, stent placement appears to be a durable option for children with iliofemoral venous thromboembolism following failure to establish vessel patency or development of recurrent thrombosis/stenosis postoperatively.

Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization Strategies After Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Complete revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention improves outcomes compared with culprit revascularization following myocardial infarction (MI) with multivessel coronary artery disease. An all-cause mortality reduction has never been demonstrated. Debate also remains regarding the optimal timing of complete revascularization (immediate or staged), and method of evaluation of nonculprit lesions (physiology or angiography). OBJECTIVES: This study aims to perform an updated systematic review with frequentist and Bayesian network meta-analyses including the totality of randomized data investigating revascularization strategies in patients presenting with MI and multivessel coronary artery disease. METHODS: The primary comparison tested complete vs culprit revascularization. Timing and methods of achieving complete revascularization were assessed. The prespecified primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Outcomes were expressed as relative risk (RR) (95% CI). RESULTS: Twenty-four eligible trials randomized 16,371 patients (weighted mean follow-up: 26.4 months). Compared with culprit revascularization, complete revascularization reduced all-cause mortality in patients with any MI (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.74-0.99; P = 0.04). Cardiovascular mortality, MI, major adverse cardiac events and repeat revascularization were also significantly reduced. In patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, the point estimate for all-cause mortality with complete revascularization was RR: 0.91 (95% CI: 0.78-1.05; P = 0.18). Rates of stent thrombosis, major bleeding, and acute kidney injury were similar. Immediate complete revascularization ranked higher than staged complete revascularization for all endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Complete revascularization following MI reduces all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, MI, major adverse cardiac events, and repeat revascularization. There may be benefits to immediate complete revascularization, but additional head-to-head trials are needed.

Comparative efficacy of drug-eluting balloon and drug-eluting stent for treatment of in-stent restenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of drug-eluting stents and drug-eluting balloons in treating in-stent restenosis. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted from January to February 2022, and comprised literature search on PubMed, ProQuest, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar databases with relevant key words to locate randomised controlled trials and observational studies published between 2000 and 2022 that compared drugeluting balloons and drug-eluting stents in the treatment of in-stent restenosis. The outcomes were all-cause death, cardiovascular death, major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke and target vessel revascularisation. The pooled risk ratio for each outcome was analysed. Data was analysed using Review Manager 5.1. RESULTS: Of the 1,105 studies identified, 11(0.99%) were analysed in detail; 7(63.6%) randomised controlled trials and 4(36.4%) observational studies. There were 2,437 patients with in-stent restenosis. There was no significant difference between drug-eluting balloons and drugeluting stents with respect to all-cause death, cardiovascular death, stroke, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction and major adverse cardiovascular events (p>0.05). Drug-eluting stents significantly caused more target vessel revascularisation compared to drugeluting balloons (p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Except for target vessel revascularisation, the drug-eluting balloons and drug-eluting stents had no difference in terms of clinical outcomes related to in-stent restenosis patients.

Immediate Destiny of Bifurcation Lesions Treated with Biomatrix Alpha Stents.

BACKGROUND: About 15% of coronary artery interventions are performed on coronary artery bifurcation. Managing these lesions presents a significant therapeutic obstacle in the context of coronary artery issues. Addressing both immediate and lasting side effects of these lesions demands ongoing monitoring and action. The introduction of drug-eluting stents has raised hopes for better outcomes in patients experiencing cardiovascular events. METHODS: In this study, we selected 51 patients (out of 850) who had received ≥1 cobalt-chromium, biodegradable polymer, Biolimus A9-eluting stent (CoCr-BP-BES) Biomatrix Alpha stent. Immediately after stenting, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow score in the coronary artery and its bypass branch, plaque shift, and lateral dissection immediately after angioplasty were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean age for patients was 65 (±10.35) years, where 49.02% of them were male and 45.1% had diabetes. No lateral dissection and death were reported in any of the patients. Also, the TIMI flow grade was 3 for the main branch in all patients. Plaque shifts were compared at different degrees of the TIMI flow coronary artery bypass graft. A statistical study revealed a noteworthy distinction between the groups. There was no discernible change when gender, diabetes, systolic and diastolic blood pressure with plaque changes were all controlled for. CONCLUSION: We discovered that the Biomatrix Alpha stents' instant clinical results are admissible. Our findings confirm the clinical utility of the recently developed biolimus-eluting (BES) stent technology, which combines the BA-9 medication, a thin-strut CoCr stent platform, and a biodegradable polymer. This aligns with the existing body of research on the most recent generation of drug-eluting stents (DES).

[Treatment Strategies for Gastric Cancer Patients with Gastric Outlet Obstruction].

Gastric cancer frequently leads to gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), causing significant symptoms and complications. Surgical bypass and stenting are two representative palliative treatments for GOO by gastric cancer. This study reviews clinical guidelines for malignant GOO treatment, highlighting differences in recommendations based on patient survival expectations and systemic health. A meta-analysis of surgical bypass and stenting in gastric cancer patients revealed no significant difference in technical and clinical success rates between the two treatments. However, stenting allowed faster resumption of oral intake and shorter hospital stays but had higher rates of major complications and reobstruction. Despite these differences, overall survival did not significantly differ between the two groups. Emerging techniques like EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy show promise but require further research and experienced practitioners. Ultimately, treatment should be tailored to patient preferences and the specific benefits and drawbacks of each method to improve quality of life and outcomes.

Long-term outcomes following bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.

INTRODUCTION: The higher scaffold thrombosis rates observed with the first-generation bioresorbable scaffolds (BRSs) compared to conventional drug-eluting stents were likely due in part to bioresorbable polymers having insufficient radial strength, necessitating larger strut profiles. Meta-analysis of the long-term outcomes from the first-generation Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) showed that this period of excess risk ended at 3 years. Therefore, current attention has been focused on improving early outcomes by increasing the scaffold's tensile strength and reducing strut thickness. AREAS COVERED: This review summaries the lessons learned from the first-generation BRS. It updates the long-term clinical outcomes of trials evaluating the ABSORB BVS and metallic alloy based BRS. In addition, it reviews the next-generation BRSs manufactured in Asia. EXPERT OPINION: Critical areas to improve the performance and safety of biodegradable scaffolds include further development in material science, surface modification, delivery systems, and long-term follow-up studies.

Safety and effectiveness of LEO stents for dual stent-assisted embolization combined with IA and IV intra-procedural infusion of tirofiban in the treatment of wide-necked intracranial bifurcation aneurysms.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of employing LEO stents in dual stent-assisted embolization (DSAE) for wide-necked intracranial bifurcation aneurysms, and to assess the effectiveness of combined IA and IV intra-procedural infusion of tirofiban in mitigating perioperative complications. Methods: Clinical data and follow-up images from 562 patients with wide-necked intracranial bifurcation aneurysms treated at First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University from 2018-2022 were collected. Among them, 65 received DSAE with LEO stents. The study observed treatment success rates, procedure-related complications, perioperative thromboembolic events (TEs) and hemorrhagic events (HEs), immediate postoperative modified Raymond-Roy classification (mRR), and follow-up imaging. Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at discharge and clinical follow-ups were recorded. Results: The study enrolled 65 patients (mean age: 56.77 ± 10.07) with wide-necked intracranial bifurcation aneurysms. Among them, 58 had unruptured aneurysms, 7 ruptured (Hunt-Hess II-III). All aneurysms were successfully embolized without significant stent or bleeding complications. Only one case had intraoprative thrombosis; two postoperative ischemic incidents occurred within three days, no severe bleeding events. Immediate imaging showed modified Raymond-Roy classification: mRRC I (92.3%), mRRC II (4.6%), mRRC III b (3.1%). A total of 43 patients were followed up postoperatively with DSA. Among them, 41 patients exhibited mRRC I, while 2 patients exhibited mRRC II. No aneurysm was recanalized. Discharge GOS: GOS 5-60, GOS 4-1, GOS 3-4. One patient, GOS 1, died from lung cancer; others improved. Conclusion: The utilization of LEO stents for dual stent-assisted embolization of wide-necked intracranial bifurcation aneurysms demonstrated remarkable success and safety, yielding favorable postoperative outcomes and no instances of aneurysm recurrence. The concomitant administration of perioperative antiplatelet medications alongside IA and IV intra-procedural infusion of tirofiban effectively attenuated thromboembolic events (TEs) without concomitant elevations in bleeding risks.

Long-Term Outcomes Following Sirolimus-Coated Balloon or Drug-Eluting Stents for Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that drug-coated balloons may benefit in-stent restenosis (ISR) treatment. However, the efficacy of new-generation sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB) compared with the latest generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) has not been studied in this setting. METHODS: All patients in the EASTBORNE (The All-Comers Sirolimus-Coated Balloon European Registry) and DEB-DRAGON (DEB vs Thin-DES in DES-ISR: Long Term Outcomes) registries undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for DES-ISR were included in the study. The primary study end point was target lesion revascularization at 24 months. Secondary end points were major adverse cardiovascular events, all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization at 24 months. Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SCB versus thin-struts DES in ISR at long-term follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 1545 patients with 1679 ISR lesions were included in the pooled analysis, of whom 621 (40.2%) patients with 621 lesions were treated with thin-strut DES and 924 (59.8%) patients with 1045 lesions were treated with SCB. The unmatched cohort showed no differences in the incidence of target lesion revascularization (10.8% versus 11.8%; P=0.568); however, there was a trend toward lower rates of myocardial infarction (7.4% versus 5.0%; P=0.062) and major adverse cardiovascular events (20.8% versus 17.1%; P=0.072) in the SCB group. After propensity score matching (n=335 patients per group), there were no significant differences in the rates of target lesion revascularization (11.6% versus 11.8%; P=0.329), target vessel revascularization (14.0% versus 13.1%; P=0.822), myocardial infarction (7.2% versus 4.5%; P=0.186), all-cause death (5.7% versus 4.2%; P=0.476), and major adverse cardiovascular event (21.5% versus 17.6%; P=0.242) between DES and SCB treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ISR, angioplasty with SCB compared with thin-struts DES is associated with comparable rates of target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction, all-cause death, and major adverse cardiovascular events at 2 years.

The use of self-expanding metallic stents in the management of benign colonic obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Patients presenting with large bowel obstruction (LBO) frequently undergo emergency surgery that is associated with significant morbidity. In malignant LBO, endoscopic approaches with placement is a self-expanding metal stent (SEMS), have been proposed to prevent emergency surgery and act as a bridge to an elective procedure-with the intention of avoiding a stoma and reducing morbidity. This systematic review aims to assess the quality and outcomes of data available on the use of SEMS in benign causes of colonic obstruction. METHODS: This systematic review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and the protocol was registered on Prospero (ID: CRD42021239363). PUBMED, MEDLINE, HMIC, CINAHL, AMED, EMBASE, APA and Cochrane databases were searched. Studies were assessed for quality utilising the MINORS criteria. Pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using random effects models. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included for analysis. 300 patients were included with an average age of 68, and a male predominance of 57%. The quality of the papers included were at risk of bias. The pooled rate of technical success of procedure was 94.4% (95% CI 90.5-96.8%) The pooled rate of clinical success was 77.6% (95% CI: 66.6-85.7%). Adverse effects were low, with perforation 8.8% (4.5-16.6%), recurrence 26.5% (17.2-38.5%) and stent migration 22.5% (14.1-33.8%). DISCUSSION: This systematic review demonstrated that SEMS for benign colonic obstruction can be a safe and successful procedure. The utilisation of SEMS in malignant disease as a bridge to surgery has been well documented. Whilst the limitations of the data interpreted are appreciated, we postulate that SEMS could be utilised to decompress patients acutely and allow pre-operative optimisation, leading to a more elective surgery with less subsequent morbidity.