Human Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter 1: Novel Biomarker and Prognostic Indicator for Patients with Gemcitabine-Treated Pancreatic Cancer.

Aim: This article aimed to find appropriate pancreatic cancer (PC) patients to treat with Gemcitabine with better survival outcomes by detecting hENT1 levels. Methods: We collected surgical pathological tissues from PC patients who received radical surgery in our hospital from September 2004 to December 2014. A total of 375 PC tissues and paired adjacent nontumor tissues were employed for the construction of 4 tissue microarrays (TMAs). The quality of the 4 TMAs was examined by HE staining. We performed immunohistochemistry analysis to evaluate hENT1 expression in the TMAs. Moreover, we detected hENT1 expression level and proved the role of hENT1 in cell proliferation, drug resistance, migration and invasion in vivo and vitro. Results: The results indicated that low hENT1 expression indicated a significantly poor outcome in PC patients, including shortened DFS (21.6±2.8 months versus 36.9±4.0 months, p<0.001) and OS (33.6±3.9 versus 39.6±3.9, p=0.004). Meanwhile, patients in stage I/II of TNM stage had a longer OS (40.2±3.4 versus 15.4±1.7, p=0.002) and DFS (31.0±3.1 versus 12.4±1.9, p=0.016) than patients in stage III/IV. Patients in M0 stage had a longer OS (39.7±3.4 versus 16.2±1.9, p=0.026) and DFS(30.7±3.0 versus 11.8±2.2, p=0.031) than patients in M1 stage, and patients with tumors not invading the capsule had a better DFS than those with tumor invasion into the capsule (30.8±3.0 versus 12.6±2.3, p=0.053). Patients with preoperative CA19-9 values ≤467 U/mL have longer DFS than that of patients who had preoperative CA19-9 values >467 U/mL (37.9±4.1 versus 22.9±4.0, p=0.04). In the subgroup analysis, a high hENT1 expression level was related to a longer OS(39.4±4.0 versus 31.5±3.9, p=0.001) and DFS(35.7±4.0 versus 20.6±2.7; p<0.0001) in the Gemcitabine subgroup. Conclusion: PC patients with high hENT1 expression have a better survival outcomes when receiving Gemcitabine. hENT1 expression can be a great prognostic indicator for PC patients to receive Gemcitabine treatment.

Evaluation of determinants for age disparities in the survival improvement of colon cancer: results from a cohort of more than 486,000 patients in the United States.

Over the past two decades, elderly colon cancer patients experienced less improvement in survival than their younger counterparts, yet the contributing factors remain unknown. We aimed to evaluate factors that may contribute to the age disparity of survival improvement among patients with colon cancer. Using data from the National Cancer Database, we identified patients diagnosed with colon cancer between 2004 and 2012 with follow-up data up to 2017. The hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for 5-year OS associated with study variables were estimated using multivariable Cox regression. Among 486,284 patients included in this study, elderly patients (aged ≥75) had a lower adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) treatment guidelines (% of non-adherence: 45.3%) than younger patients (aged <50, 19.3%; P<0.001). After adjusting for demographics, access to care and clinical characteristics, compared with patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2006, younger and older patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2012 experienced 16% (HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.81-0.88) and 6% (HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.93-0.95) reductions in mortality (P for interaction=1.42×10-5), respectively. After an additional adjustment for guideline adherence status, no significant difference in the improvement of survival was noted (P for interaction=0.17). The association patterns were similar regardless of tumor stage, race, and high comorbidity scores (all P for interaction>0.05). Several patient-related factors were identified in association with noncompliance to NCCN guidelines, including comorbidity status. However, over 60% of noncompliance elderly patients had a Charlson comorbidity score of 0. The observed age disparity in survival improvement among colon cancer patients was primarily explained by a slower improvement in adherence to NCCN treatment guidelines in elderly than younger patients. Many older adults were not receiving recommended therapies despite minimal comorbidities. Our findings call for measures to increase adherence to treatment guidelines among elderly patients to improve survival.

Real-Time Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube-Based Fluorescence Imaging Improves Survival after Debulking Surgery in an Ovarian Cancer Model.

Improved cytoreductive surgery for advanced stage ovarian cancer (OC) represents a critical challenge in the treatment of the disease. Optimal debulking reaching no evidence of macroscopic disease is the primary surgical end point with a demonstrated survival advantage. Targeted molecule-based fluorescence imaging offers complete tumor resection down to the microscopic scale. We used a custom-built reflectance/fluorescence imaging system with an orthotopic OC mouse model to both quantify tumor detectability and evaluate the effect of fluorescence image-guided surgery on post-operative survival. The contrast agent is an intraperitoneal injectable nanomolecular probe, composed of single-walled carbon nanotubes, coupled to an M13 bacteriophage carrying a modified peptide binding to the SPARC protein, an extracellular protein overexpressed in OC. The imaging system is capable of detecting a second near-infrared window fluorescence (1000-1700 nm) and can display real-time video imagery to guide intraoperative tumor debulking. We observed high microscopic tumor detection with a pixel-limited resolution of 200 µm. Moreover, in a survival-surgery orthotopic OC mouse model, we demonstrated an increased survival benefit for animals treated with fluorescence image-guided surgical resection compared to standard surgery.

Improving free-flap survival using intra-operative heparin: Ritualistic practice or evidence-base medicine? A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: The failure rate of free flaps is approximately 5%, mostly due to thrombosis of microvascular anastomosis. A number of pharmacological agents have been tested in order to enhance the patency of microvascular anastomosis and so to as extend the survival of free flaps. One of them is heparin, a very commonly used anticoagulant. However, there exists no consensus on its use in microsurgery as concerns time of introduction (pre-, intra- or post-operative), recommended dosage, or duration of utilization. The aim of this study was to determine whether or not the use of intra-operative heparin, in its systemic or topical forms, can bring about improved survival of free flaps, and if and when it should be recommended in microsurgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review on the PUBMED database enabled us to identify articles evaluating the benefits of intra-operative heparin with regard to free-flap survival. All in all, fifteen articles in animal and human research were selected. RESULTS: As far as animal research is concerned, 9 studies out of 11 showed the superiority of topical intra-operative heparin compared to saline in improving free-flap survival rates through improved patency of the anastomosis. As regards systemic intra-operative heparin, on the other hand, only two trials out of four yielded favorable results. In clinical research in humans, there has been no prospective randomized trial studying the action of topical intra-operative heparin in vessel irrigation of ex-vivo free flaps before vascular repermeabilisation. However, the preliminary results of four trials seem to provide positive arguments for this practice. CONCLUSION: The use of systemic per-operative heparin (intravenous injection) does not improve the survival of free flaps in either animal models or humans. In animal models, however, the use of topical intra-operative heparin (vessel irrigation) has been shown to improve the free-flap survival rate by avoiding thrombosis of microvascular anastomosis. Finally, in clinical studies concerning humans, as of now no prospective randomized trial has proven that use of topical intra-operative heparin to ensure vessel irrigation in ex-vivo flaps is likely to increase free-flap survival. Studies should be conducted to decide whether or not to validate a rather ritualistic practice that consists in irrigating the relevant vessels before anastomosis; does it or does it not improve the patency rate?

Can cancer registries show whether treatment is contributing to survival increases for melanoma of the skin at a population level?

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: It is uncertain whether survival increases from melanoma recorded by some population registries include a treatment effect. The US Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) programme has good data quality control, large numbers of cases enabling high statistical precision and summary stage plus thickness, which we consider to be a best-case population registry scenario to investigate potential for a treatment effect. We have investigated SEER data to indicate whether survivals increases are fully attributable to earlier diagnosis and other non-treatment factors. METHODS: Through relative survival regression, the effects of diagnostic period on 5-year excess mortality were investigated, adjusting for socio-demographic factors, lesion sub-site, histology, thickness and stage at diagnosis in 1990-2009 (n = 99 690 cases). RESULTS: The reduction in excess mortality (95% confidence interval) between 1990-1999 and 2000-2009 was 31 (20-41)% for localised melanoma, 18 (12-22)% for regional melanoma and 3 (-5-10)% for melanomas with distant spread. Younger age was predictive of a greater percentage reduction. Treatment benefits are inferred from the higher survivals in 2000-2009 but uncertainty remains due to incomplete data to adjust for non-treatment factors and a lack of treatment data. CONCLUSIONS: Registries should use new information systems to collect more complete data on stage, other prognostic indicators, co-morbidities and treatment, to provide more definitive and detailed information on population effects of cancer control.

Metastatic breast cancer: are we treating the same patients as in the past?

BACKGROUND: Early detection and improved (neo)-adjuvant treatment has extended survival of breast cancer over the last decades. It remains controversial whether a survival benefit is achieved once metastases have occurred. This study investigates survival trends in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) looking at the distribution of prognostic factors and the time period of the diagnosis of the primary and metastatic disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 1635 patients, diagnosed with MBC and treated at three German cancer centers, were included. For the survival analysis, patients were grouped into three time periods [1980-1994 (a), 1995-1999 (b) and 2000-2009 (c)], which were chosen according to the availability of new antineoplastic drugs for the treatment of MBC. Additionally, patients were divided into three risk groups using the simultaneously published prognostic score. RESULTS: The analysis of overall survival according to the date of primary diagnosis demonstrated a significant decline compared with the reference (a): (a versus b) hazard ratio (HR) = 1.37; P < 0.001; (a versus c) HR = 2.45; P < 0.001. Considering the time of first occurrence of metastasis, survival remains unchanged over the three periods (a versus b): HR = 0.94 P = 0.436; (a versus c): HR = 0.95; P = 0.435. However, a significant shift towards more unfavorable risk factors was seen. CONCLUSIONS: Although survival in MBC remains unchanged over time, patients developing metastatic disease have a more aggressive disease that is presumably compensated by more effective treatment. This alteration of tumor biology in MBC may be explained by a negative selection of patients with adverse risk profiles due to the advantages of the adjuvant therapy.

Survival in patients with synchronous liver metastases in central and northern Denmark, 1998 to 2009.

OBJECTIVE: In Denmark, the strategy for treatment of cancer with metastases to the liver has changed dramatically during the period 1998 to 2009, when multidisciplinary care and a number of new treatments were introduced. We therefore examined the changes in survival in Danish patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC) or other solid tumors (non-CRC) who had liver metastases at time of diagnosis. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We included patients diagnosed with liver metastases synchronous with a primary cancer (ie, a solid cancer diagnosed at the same date or within 60 days after liver metastasis diagnosis) during the period 1998 to 2009 identified through the Danish National Registry of Patients. We followed those who survived for more than 60 days in a survival analysis (n = 1021). Survival and mortality rate ratio (MRR) at 1, 3, and 5 years stratified by year of diagnosis were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. RESULTS: In the total study population of 1021 patients, 541 patients had a primary CRC and 480 patients non-CRC. Overall, the 5-year survival improved from 3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1%-6%) in 1998-2000 to 10% (95% CI: 6%-14%) in 2007 to 2009 (predicted value). The 5-year survival for CRC-patients improved from 1% (95% CI: 0%-5%) to 11% (95% CI: 6%-18%) whereas survival for non-CRC patients only increased from 5% (95% CI: 1%-10%) to 8% (95% CI: 4%-14%). CONCLUSION: We observed improved survival in patients with liver metastases in a time period characterized by introduction of a structured multidisciplinary care and improved treatment options. The survival gain was most prominent for CRC-patients.