The effects of ulimorelin, a ghrelin agonist, on liquid gastric emptying and colonic transit in humans.

BACKGROUND: Ulimorelin, a small molecule ghrelin agonist and prokinetic agent, was effective in animal models of gastroparesis and delayed transit. However, employing once daily administration, it failed in clinical trials of postoperative ileus (POI), a condition in which colonic motility recovers last. The aim of this study was to evaluate drug dosing and regional differences in drug activity between stomach and colon. METHODS: Gastric emptying was assessed by scintigraphy in healthy adults at single doses of 600-1200 µg kg-1 and multiple doses of 80-600 µg kg-1 Q8H for 7 days. Colonic motility was assessed by 7-region scintigraphic analysis at a dose of 600 µg kg-1 for 2 days. The primary endpoints were percent change in time to 50% (∆t50 ) liquid gastric emptying on Days 1, 4, and 6 and the geometric mean center of colonic transit at 24 hours (GC24 ). Plasma concentrations of free and total ulimorelin were measured for pharmacokinetic and exposure-response modeling. KEY RESULTS: Ulimorelin 150-600 µg kg-1 every 8 hours resulted in statistically significant improvements (∆t50  = 23% to 46% (P < .05)) in gastric emptying from baseline that were sustained through Day 6. However, no effects on GC24 were observed. Pharmacokinetic analyses suggested that the free concentrations of ulimorelin achieved in POI trials and dosing frequency may have been inadequate. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Ulimorelin is a potent gastric prokinetic but lacks evidence of activity in the human colon, pointing to the stomach as the predominant site of action of ghrelin in humans; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02993055.

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind study of ulimorelin and metoclopramide in the treatment of critically ill patients with enteral feeding intolerance: PROMOTE trial.

PURPOSE: Enteral feeding intolerance (EFI) is a frequent problem in the intensive care unit (ICU), but current prokinetic agents have uncertain efficacy and safety profiles. The current study compared the efficacy and safety of ulimorelin, a ghrelin agonist, with metoclopramide in the treatment of EFI. METHODS: One hundred twenty ICU patients were randomized 1:1 to ulimorelin or metoclopramide for 5 days. EFI was diagnosed by a gastric residual volume (GRV) ≥ 500 ml. A volume-based feeding protocol was employed, and enteral formulas were standardized. The primary end point was the percentage daily protein prescription (%DPP) received by patients over 5 days of treatment. Secondary end points included feeding success, defined as 80% DPP; gastric emptying, assessed by paracetamol absorption; incidences of recurrent intolerance (GRV ≥ 500 ml); vomiting or regurgitation; aspiration, defined by positive tracheal aspirates for pepsin; and pulmonary infection. RESULTS: One hundred twenty patients were randomized and received the study drug (ulimorelin 62, metoclopramide 58). Mean APACHE II and SOFA scores were 21.6 and 8.6, and 63.3% of patients had medical reasons for ICU admission. Ulimorelin and metoclopramide resulted in comparable %DPPs over 5 days of treatment (median [Q1, Q3]: 82.9% [38.4%, 100.2%] and 82.3% [65.6%, 100.2%], respectively, p = 0.49). Five-day rates of feeding success were 67.7% and 70.6% when terminations unrelated to feeding were excluded, and there were no differences in any secondary outcomes or adverse events between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both prokinetic agents achieved similar rates of feeding success, and no safety differences between the two treatment groups were observed.

The treatment of gastroparesis, constipation and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth syndrome in patients with Parkinson's disease.

INTRODUCTION: Parkinson's disease (PD) affects the nerves of the entire gastrointestinal (GI) tract and may result in profound gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction leading to poor patient outcomes. Common GI disturbances in patients with PD include gastroparesis (GP), constipation and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth syndrome (SIBO). In particular, GP is difficult to treat due to the limited options available and precautions, contraindications and adverse effects associated with the approved treatments. Moreover, some commonly used medications can worsen pre-existing PD. AREAS COVERED: Our review will focus on treatment options for GP and SIBO with motilin agonists, dopamine receptor antagonists, Ghrelin agonists muscarinic agonists, 5-HT4 receptor agonists, antibiotics, probiotics and herbal formulation such as iberogast. Constipation occurs in the majority of patients with PD and fortunately many treatments are now available. Our review is based on original papers or reviews selected from PUBMED search and Cochrane reviews. EXPERT OPINION: Motility disorders of the GI tract are found frequently in patients with PD and treating the underlying GI disorders caused by PD with various prokinetics and laxatives is paramount in achieving improvements in patient's motor function. Various prokinetics and laxatives are now available to provide some relief of the GI morbidity caused by PD leading even to better absorption of even the PD treatments.

Analysis of the ghrelin receptor-independent vascular actions of ulimorelin.

Ulimorelin (TZP101) is a ghrelin receptor agonist that stimulates intestinal motility, but also reduces blood pressure in rodents and humans and dilates blood vessels. It has been proposed as a treatment for intestinal motility disorders. Here we investigated the mechanisms through which ulimorelin affects vascular diameter. Actions of ulimorelin on wall tension of rodent arteries were investigated and compared with other ghrelin receptor agonists. Saphenous, mesenteric and basilar arteries were obtained from Sprague-Dawley rats (male, 8 weeks) and saphenous arteries were obtained from wild type or ghrelin receptor null mice. These were mounted in myography chambers to record artery wall tension. Ulimorelin (0.03-30µM) inhibited phenylephrine-induced contractions of rat saphenous (IC50=0.6µM; Imax=66±5%; n=3-6) and mesenteric arteries (IC50=5µM, Imax=113±16%; n=3-4), but not those contracted by U46619, ET-1 or 60mM [K(+)]. Relaxation of phenylephrine-constricted arteries was not observed with ghrelin receptor agonists TZP102, capromorelin or AZP-531. In rat saphenous and basilar arteries, ulimorelin (10-100µM) and TZP102 (10-100µM) constricted arteries (EC50=9.9µM; Emax=50±7% and EC50=8µM; Emax=99±16% respectively), an effect not attenuated by the ghrelin receptor antagonist YIL 781 3µM or mimicked by capromorelin or AZP-531. In mesenteric arteries, ulimorelin, 1-10µM, caused a surmountable rightward shift in the response to phenylephrine (0.01-1000µM; pA2=5.7; n=3-4). Ulimorelin had similar actions in mouse saphenous artery from both wild type and ghrelin receptor null mice. We conclude that ulimorelin causes vasorelaxation through competitive antagonist action at α1-adrenoceptors and a constrictor action not mediated via the ghrelin receptor.

Ghrelin and motilin receptor agonists: time to introduce bias into drug design.

Ghrelin and motilin receptor agonists increase gastric motility and are attractive drug targets. However, 14 years after the receptors were described (18-24 years since ligands became available) the inactivity of the ghrelin agonist TZP-102 in patients with gastroparesis joins the list of unsuccessful motilin agonists. Fundamental questions must be asked. Pustovit et al., have now shown that the ghrelin agonist ulimorelin evokes prolonged increases in rat colorectal propulsion yet responses to other ghrelin agonists fade. Similarly, different motilin agonists induce short- or long-lasting effects in a cell-dependent manner. Together, these and other data create the hypothesis that the receptors can be induced to preferentially signal ('biased agonism') via particular pathways to evoke different responses with therapeutic advantages/disadvantages. Biased agonism has been demonstrated for ghrelin. Are motilin agonists which cause long-lasting facilitation of human stomach cholinergic function (compared with motilin) biased agonists (e.g., camicinal, under development for patients with gastric hypo-motility)? For ghrelin, additional complications exist because the therapeutic aims/mechanisms of action are uncertain, making it difficult to select the best (biased) agonist. Will ghrelin agonists be useful treatments of nausea and/or as suggested by Pustovit et al., chronic constipation? How does ghrelin increase gastric motility? As gastroparesis symptoms poorly correlate with delayed gastric emptying (yet gastro-prokinetic drugs can provide relief: e.g., low-dose erythromycin), would low doses of ghrelin and motilin agonists relieve symptoms simply by restoring neuromuscular rhythm? These questions on design and functions need addressing if ghrelin and motilin agonists are to reach patients as drugs.