RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: After modified Wendler glottoplasty (mWG), close follow-up with laryngologist and speech-language pathologist (SLP) is thought to be essential to achieve best outcomes. This study presents a case series of patients undergoing mWG at a single institution to identify factors associated with trends in post-operative follow-up. METHODS: Retrospective review of trans women patients who underwent mWG between March 2018 and July 2023 was performed. Demographic data, pre-operative care, and post-operative course were reviewed. Lost to follow-up (LTFU) was defined as a failure to return to the office or schedule a follow-up appointment as recommended, for ≥2 months after last visit. Logistic regressions were utilized to identify possible factors associated with being LTFU. RESULTS: Eight (50%) of 16 patients met LTFU criteria. Patients were considered not LTFU if they completed care (n = 3, 19%) or were still undergoing care (n = 5, 31%). Patients with chronic diseases were less likely to become LTFU (p = 0.03). Those lost to follow-up had more no-show visits (p = 0.04). Total number of gender-affirming surgeries, distance from hospital, socioeconomic status of residential zip code, race/ethnicity, other psychological history, and patient-reported outcome measure scores did not affect LTFU rates. CONCLUSION: Fifty percent of patients were LTFU after modified Wendler glottoplasty. Even one no-show visit increased risk of being LTFU, whereas the presence of chronic diseases was protective against this. This study illustrates that increased efforts are needed following mWG to better understand the factors associated with being LTFU and to facilitate patients' ability to complete post-operative care successfully. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 2024.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: One challenge in voice therapy is that mastering new vocal techniques is inherently cognitively effortful. While effort is critical for learning, it can also lead to frustration and reduced patient engagement. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between patient-perception of voice handicap and mental effort in voice therapy, and to determine if different therapy approaches and stimuli elicit different perceptions of mental effort. METHODS: A nonexperimental, prospective investigation was conducted with adult patients receiving voice therapy. Prior to therapy initiation, patients completed the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) to quantify perceived severity of their voice disorders. To assess mental effort, a Borg mental effort scale and the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) were administered following each therapy session. Therapy type and treatment stimulus/level of treatment hierarchy were documented for each session. Kruskal-Wallis H-test was used to compare differences in baseline VHI-10 and mental effort among voice disorder diagnoses. Pairwise comparisons, linear random-intercept mixed-effects model, and generalized estimating equation method were used to determine correlation between VHI-10 and mental effort, and therapy type, stimulus, and effort. RESULTS: Twenty-seven participants (89% female, 60% white) completed the study. There was no significant difference in VHI-10 or baseline perceptions of mental effort between races or among voice disorder diagnoses. There was a significant positive correlation between VHI-10 scores and session 1 mental effort. There was no significant difference in effort ratings among therapy types, but effort was rated as significantly greater for therapy stimuli that involved connected speech practice than other stimuli. Perceived mental effort significantly decreased over time. DISCUSSION: Voice therapy imposes a cognitive load on the patient, and is particularly challenging for individuals with more severely perceived voice disorders. Further, patients think voice treatment approaches that utilize connected speech stimuli are more effortful than those that use simple stimuli, regardless of treatment target (eg, resonance, flow).
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To explore the efficacy of voice therapy combined with closed reduction under local anesthesia upon arytenoid dislocation (AD) and to provide new reference for the clinical treatment of AD. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients diagnosed with unilateral AD were enrolled in the study, which were divided into the closed reduction group under local anesthesia alone (25 cases) and the closed reduction group under local anesthesia combined with voice therapy (33 cases) according to the treatment regimen. The vocal cord movements of the two groups were observed under laryngoscopy before and after treatment. Fundamental frequency (F0), fundamental frequency perturbation (Jitter), amplitude perturbation (Shimmer), and harmonic noise ratio (HNR) of the two groups before and after treatment were analyzed. Maximum vocal time (MPT) and simplified Voice Disturbance Index Scale (VHI-10) scores were obtained. RESULTS: After treatment, the redness and swelling around the affected AD of all patients were improved by an electronic dynamic laryngoscope, and the movement of vocal cords and mucosal waves were improved to diverse degrees. After treatment, F0, Jitter, Shimmer, and HNR in both groups were lower than before treatment, and MPT values were higher than before treatment, and the differences before and after treatment were statistically significant (P < 0.05), and the score of VHI-10 in both groups was lower than before treatment (P < 0.05). Patients in the closed reduction group under local anesthesia combined with voice therapy revealed better outcome over those in the closed reduction group under local anesthesia alone (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The effect of voice therapy combined with closed reduction under local anesthesia was better than that of closed reduction alone upon AD.
RESUMO
Transgender people often experience dysphoria because the way their voice is perceived does not match their gender identity. Such dysphoria negatively affects mental health and quality of life, and is particularly an issue in trans women. Dysphoria can be reduced via gender-affirming voice and communication training provided by human experts, but the accessibility of such training is often limited. As a supplement or alternative to human-guided training, our team has thus developed an early prototype of voice training software for transfeminine users (i.e., trans women and nonbinary users who were assigned male at birth). The software is accessible via a web browser and provides three vocal pitch exercises together with real-time feedback about the user's pitch relative to a desired target pitch curve. This paper presents the main technical features and results of a single-session usability evaluation with 5 transfeminine participants. We further present future plans for expansion to other exercises and voice aspects (particularly resonance) as well as plans for clinical trials.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of an intensive voice therapy delivered via telepractice for pediatric vocal fold nodules (VFNs). METHOD: Ten children with VFNs (mean age = 6 years, range = 5-8 years) were recruited in this study. Assessments including stroboscopic ratings, acoustic parameters, aerodynamic and auditory perceptual measures, and parent-reported Pediatric Voice Handicap Index were administered pretreatment and within 1 week post treatment. Eight resonant voice therapy sessions were provided three times a week via a secure online platform, which were completed within 3 weeks. The assessments were conducted in a clinical face-to-face modality in China, whereas the therapy sessions were all conducted online, with the participants and their caregivers in China and the speech-language pathologist in Taiwan. RESULTS: All participants completed the therapy sessions as scheduled, and there were no dropouts. Statistical analyses showed that significant improvements in acoustic and aerodynamic parameters, as well as stroboscopic and auditory-perceptual ratings. CONCLUSION: This study provides positive preliminary results indicating intensive voice therapy delivered via telepractice may be feasible and effective for the pediatric VFN population. Service providers and families may consider this delivery modality for ease of access when voice therapy is recommended.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Studies on treatment efficacy in unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) often lack a predetermined treatment protocol, and little is known about the effects of specific vocal techniques on vocal outcomes and quality of life in UVFP patients. The purpose of this preliminary proof-of-concept study is to investigate the effects and feasibility of two intensive treatment protocols based on water-resistance therapy (WRT) and vocal function exercises (VFE). METHODS: Ten participants with acute or chronic UVFP/paresis were recruited in the study and randomly assigned to the WRT or VFE group. Three of these participants presented with aphonia and could not complete the program as prescribed. The remaining participants completed an intensive therapy program with the assigned vocal technique. Before, during, and after the program, a multidimensional voice assessment was performed. Maximum phonation time, acoustic, perceptual, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were obtained. RESULTS: WRT and VFE had positive clinical effects on instrumental and auditory-perceptual voice quality, glottal closure, and PROMs, but interindividual variability was high. Studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to confirm or refute these findings. CONCLUSION: The WRT- and VFE-based therapy programs are both feasible and seem to elicit positive clinical changes in UVFP patients. Suggestions on how to improve the programs are provided, as well as considerations for implementation in clinical practice. Follow-up research is needed to examine the efficacy of both programs on group level.
RESUMO
Abductor vocal cord paralysis (AVCP) is a disabling disorder that affects the voice and the quality of life of a patient, and hence, there is importance in providing a detailed knowledge of its aetiology and management. In this review article, we offer an implicational definition of AVCP and a discussion of its background, viewed as potentially affecting voice production and health. Finally, we explore modalities of diagnosis by medical history and physical examination, visualization techniques like laryngoscopy and stroboscopy, and radiographic imaging such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. The article reviews and categorizes approaches into operative and non-operative treatments, including injection laryngoplasty, voice therapy, botulinum toxin injections, and the management of Reinke's edema. Surgical approaches, like arytenoid adduction, cordotomy, and posterior cordotomy, are also scrutinized taking their indication, efficacy, and complication profile into consideration. Learning about the advantages and drawbacks of the following experimental yet promising directions like nerve-muscle pedicle implantation, nerve reinnervation, and engineering of tissues is therefore highly necessitated. In conclusion, the review details the measures that have shown to be useful in the treatment process and their impact on the future practice of clinical work, calling for a more clarified structure of the organization of diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitative activities. Future research directions are outlined based on the gaps which include the development of new treatment approaches, the evaluation of treatment for long-term effects, and the need for interdisciplinary cooperation in the medical field for the benefit of the patients.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To develop sham voice treatment techniques to be used in voice treatment outcome research, and to investigate their effectiveness as sham. This entails that the techniques induce no changes in voice or voice physiology, yet still lead to a perception of efficacy. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized blinded controlled study. METHODS: Three distinct sham intervention protocols (SIPs) were conceptualized as placebic comparators for three common voice treatment approaches with focus on vocalization (SIP1), respiration (SIP2), and manipulation (SIP3). Forty-eight female students participated in the study. Each participant attended ten 30-minute sessions over 5weeks, including a baseline evaluation, three sessions of one SIP, an inter-SIP voice assessment, three sessions of a second SIP, and a final post-SIP assessment. Auditory-perceptual and instrumental voice evaluations were used as voice treatment outcome measures. The participants' perception of voice-related quality of life was evaluated using the French Voice Handicap Index (VHIFR). Frequentist as well as Bayesian statistical methods were applied for group comparisons. The effects of combining two SIPs, the potential influence of SIP order, and experimenter/clinician effects, were also investigated. RESULTS: The respiration-based SIP2 showed changes only in sound intensity level on a sustained vowel across the three sham intervention sessions. In contrast, the vocalization-based SIP1 impacted sound intensity level on a sustained vowel, sound intensity level on read text, and maximum phonation time. The manipulation-based SIP3 affected smoothed cepstral peak prominence on read text, Acoustic Voice Quality Index, and Dysphonia Severity Index. SIP2 thus demonstrated the highest alignment with the study's objectives, followed by SIP1 and SIP3. GRBASI ratings revealed no statistical differences for any SIP. VHIFr decreased significantly after all three SIPs. Combining the SIPs generally replicated the effects observed when each SIP was used individually. There was no order effect or experimenter/clinician effect on the results. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated significant changes in participants' perceived voice quality (measured with VHIFr) across various SIPs, despite minimal impact on objective voice function measures. Further investigation is necessary to establish one or more protocols as genuinely sham interventions.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Although voice therapy is a highly effective treatment for voice disorders, benefits are diminished by poor adherence to appointments. Remote telehealth delivery of therapy may address this problem by improving access. This study investigates attendance at remote telehealth voice therapy and evaluates potential correlation with patient demographics and socioeconomic status. METHODS: Retrospective review of all adult patients referred for telehealth voice therapy between April 2020-November 2021. Evaluated patient demographics including referral diagnosis, health insurance status and interpreter use, were obtained from medical records. Area Deprivation Index scores served as proxy for socioeconomic status. Multivariate analysis examined relationships between patient factors and attendance. RESULTS: Of 423 patients referred for telehealth voice therapy, 220 (52%) attended more than one therapy session, 98 (23%) attended one, and 105 (25%) never attended therapy. Multivariate analysis did not identify significant correlations between telehealth attendance and sociodemographic factors including interpreter use, insurance status, and socioeconomic status, even after adjusting for ethnicity and primary language. CONCLUSION: Over half of patients referred to telehealth voice therapy participated in multiple sessions and 75% attended at least one session. Telehealth voice therapy attendance was not negatively impacted by public health insurance and patient race and socioeconomic status did not impact attendance. Telehealth voice therapy may minimize potential barriers to care in susceptible populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
RESUMO
Background: The need for telepractice and digital treatment has increased due to issues this revision.regarding medical access and the COVID-19 pandemic. However, in many countries, telepractice is rarely performed. The purpose of this pilot study was to describe the detailed process of telepractice in patients with hyperfunctional voice disorder and investigate its effects. Methods: The three subjects who were enrolled in this pilot study had hyperfunctional voice disorders. The evaluation was performed face to face. Auditory perceptual evaluation, acoustic evaluation, aerodynamic evaluation, patient self-evaluation, and interviews were conducted. Treatment was delivered by telepractice using a smartphone application. Results: In quantitative analysis of auditory perceptual evaluation, acoustic evaluation, aerodynamic evaluation, and patient self-evaluation, all subjects showed improved voice after treatment. In-depth analysis of telepractice was performed through the interview. Conclusions: Telepractice was effective in patients with voice disorders, and the patients were satisfied with this approach. In addition to this pilot study, further large-scale studies are required, but telemedicine may improve treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction in cases where medical access is limited or during outbreaks of respiratory infections like COVID-19.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Voice rest (VR) is widely recommended after microlaryngeal surgery to facilitate recovery and improve voice outcomes. Our study is the first systematic review and meta-analysis summarizing the impact of postoperative absolute voice rest (AVR) and no voice rest (NVR) instructions on voice outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched using "voice rest laryngeal surgery" and "postoperative voice rest" for articles published before December 2022. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and RoB2 tools. Meta-analysis using a random effects model was performed for studies comparing Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10) outcomes between NVR and AVR. Analysis was performed in R Studio. RESULTS: In total, 255 articles were reviewed, 24 underwent full-text screening, and nine met inclusion criteria. Four randomized control trials (RCT) and one retrospective review compared AVR durations (range: 2-10days). Four studies (two cohort, one cross-sectional, and one RCT) compared AVR to NVR. All studies had risk of bias (ROBINS-I: two moderate, two serious; RoB2: five with concerns). Comparing AVR durations, two found no difference between short and long duration, while two reported improved outcomes for the short cohort. In studies comparing AVR to NVR, all concluded no significant difference in outcomes. Pooled analysis of three studies (355 patients) comparing NVR and AVR demonstrated no significant differences in pre- and postoperative VHI-10 change (mean difference=-0.87; 95% CI, -2.51 to 0.77; P = 0.27). CONCLUSION: Systematic review findings indicate postoperative VR may not lead to improved voice outcomes, and a meta-analysis demonstrated no difference in VHI-10 outcomes between AVR and NVR.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and long-term durability of the enhanced technique of Type II Vocal Fold Shortening and Retrodisplacement of the Anterior Commissure (VFSRAC) for voice feminization compared with the preceding Type I method. METHODS: A retrospective analysis encompassed 506 patients drawn from a cohort of 1025 MtF transgender women who underwent VFSRAC between 2003 and 2021. The study period included cases from 2015 to 2021, during which the Type II update technique was implemented, involving a modification to the suture technique. Subjective and perceptual evaluations, aerodynamic and acoustic assessments, real-time pitch analysis, and videostroboscopic reviews were conducted pre- and postoperatively in the MtF transgender women cohort. Comparative statistical analyses were performed to discern differences between the earlier Type I method (2003-2014) and the more recent Type II method (2015-2021). RESULTS: The preoperative mean speech fundamental frequency (sF0) for Type II VFSRAC was 134.5 Hz. Postoperatively, the mean sF0 increased to 196.7 Hz, 212.3 Hz, and 207.5 Hz at 3 months, 6 months, and beyond 1 year, respectively, exceeding outcomes observed with the Type I method. Postoperative subjective and objective assessments indicated an augmentation in voice femininity. Acoustic and aerodynamic indices were within the normal range, and the regularity of the vocal fold mucosal wave was preserved within normal parameters. These results suggest that patients achieved a natural phonation pattern after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The application of our updated type II VFSRAC has demonstrated feasibility and consistently yielded favorable results for individuals desiring a naturally feminine voice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 2024.
RESUMO
This study aimed to describe the clinical presentation and therapeutic course of a trained Carnatic singer with perceptually clinically normal voice who presented with singing difficulties. The participant of the study was a 25-year-old male individual who reported to the speech and language diagnostics unit with complaints of reduced vocal range for singing and strained voice while singing. After the routine voice evaluations, the subject was allotted Resonant Voice Therapy. The baseline recordings were compared with the subsequent voice recordings of the subject, on different parameters, along the course of the training. The post-training recordings showed an increase in the singing range of the subject from 9 semitones to 19-20 semitones with modifications in adharashruthi. There were reductions in the perturbation and noise-to-harmonic ratio found in post-training samples. This case study highlights the innovative application of RVT to expand pitch range in a Carnatic singer with normative vocal parameters but encountering singing difficulties. The findings underscore the potential of RVT as a transformative intervention, offering promising avenues for enhancing vocal performance and addressing challenges specific to Carnatic singing techniques.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The terminology used by speech-language pathologists (SLPs) during voice therapy is important for treatment outcomes because it can impact both patient self-efficacy and adherence. However, little is known about what factors influence the terminology that SLPs choose to use. Understanding this gap is important to ultimately optimize voice therapy outcomes. Therefore, the primary aims of this study were to (1) assess the relationship between reported clinician-perceived positivity and (2) assess the relationship between clinician-perceived positivity and clinical endorsement for use. We hypothesized that clinician-perceived positivity would be one important factor driving how frequently clinicians use or avoid specific terms, and if they think the term should be used by other SLPs in clinical practice. DESIGN/METHODS: This prospective study was conducted as an online survey of SLPs and SLP clinical fellows who evaluate and treat adult voice patients. The survey presented respondents with a total of 46 voice-related terms and prompted respondents to rate: (1) how frequently they use a specific voice-related term ("frequency of use"); (2) how positive or negative they perceive a specific voice-related term to be ("perceived positivity"); and (3) if they feel a specific voice-related term should versus should not be used in clinical practice ("clinical endorsement"). Inferential statistics were used to examine the relationship between perceived positivity and frequency of use, and perceived positivity and clinical endorsement. Summary statistics were used to describe frequency of use across all terms. RESULTS: One hundred twelve respondents completed the survey. Clinician-perceived positivity of voice-related terminology was significantly related to its reported self-reported frequency of use (ß = 1.946; 95% CI: 1.701-2.191; P < 0.0005) and clinical endorsement of use by others (ß = 4.103; 95% CI: 3.750-4.456; P < 0.0005). Both of these relationships exhibited relatively large effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS: This study was an important first step at identifying factors that influence SLP's use of specific terminology in voice therapy. Specifically, an SLP's perceived positivity of clinical terminology strongly influenced the frequency with which they reported using that term in voice therapy and whether or not they thought that term should be used with patients by other SLPs in voice therapy. Future work should investigate clinician characteristics that might affect terminology use, include more diverse sampling, utilize self-selected terminology or audio recordings of therapy interactions, and assess direct effects of terminology use on patient outcomes.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP), characterized by immobility of one vocal fold, results from injuries of recurrent laryngeal nerves. Voice therapy is a conservative intervention aiming to address these symptoms, but standard protocols are lacking. In this study, we provided an updated review of voice therapy for UVFP over the past 3 years and analyzed the effect of voice therapy from the perspective of voice assessment recommended by the guidelines of the European Laryngological Society and the Union of the European Phoniatricians in 2023. METHODS: Following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement, we searched the databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and SCOPUS, from their earliest records to December 1, 2023. Quality assessment utilized Cochrane Risk of Bias and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tools. Data extraction encompassed study design, participant characteristics, therapy protocols, and outcome measures, including subjective and objective assessments. We performed heterogeneity analysis by calculating the I2 statistic and meta-analysis by calculating the standardized difference of means and weighted mean differences. RESULTS: Our systematic review and meta-analysis included 12 studies encompassing 459 patients. The review revealed a predominance of female participants across studies. Therapy protocols primarily included breathing control, laryngeal manipulation, and resonance training, often supplemented by home exercises. Outcome measures demonstrated significant improvements in subjective parameter: Voice Handicap Index ((standard mean difference) SMD = -1.51, P < 0.001), acoustic parameters: fundamental frequency (SMD = -0.38, P = 0.003), jitter (SMD = -0.97, P < 0.001), shimmer (SMD = -0.94, P < 0.001), and noise-to-harmonic ratio (SMD = -0.89, P < 0.001), and aerodynamic parameters: maximum phonation time (SMD = 1.29, P < 0.001), with early intervention yielding enhanced rate of complete glottal closure. DISCUSSION: Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involved patients aware of their allocation to the treatment group, and the remaining 10 studies were retrospective, leading to bias from deviations in the intended intervention. Subjective and aerodynamic parameter inconsistency was observed, but after excluding studies with the onset of UVFP greater than 12 months, the heterogeneity of VHI scores decreased. The funnel plot was grossly symmetrical in the publication bias test. Significant improvements were noted in subjective, acoustic, and aerodynamic outcomes after intervention. Besides, there were commonalities in protocols, such as breathing control, laryngeal manipulation, and resonance training, often supplemented by home exercises. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: This protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on March 28, 2024, registration number: CRD42024529750.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of fast speaking on pause duration, breath group duration, and fundamental frequency (FO) in rote speech (counting). METHOD: Twenty-eight healthy women (age 18-39) who had no experience of voice training, repeated a counting task in both a habitual and fast speaking rate. Pause duration, breath group duration, and mean fundamental frequency were measured from audio recordings. Differences in the study variables between habitual and fast speaking rates were analyzed and tested for statistical significance. RESULTS: In fast speaking rate, mean pause duration was shorter and mean breath group duration longer as compared with habitual speaking rate, both with statistical significance at the group level. Surprisingly, mean fundamental frequency was significantly lower in the fast-speaking rate condition. CONCLUSION: The results overall supported the hypothesis that pause duration becomes shorter and breath group duration longer with a fast-speaking rate. This may have clinical relevance for voice therapy and supports the importance of speaking rate for the understanding and treatment of some hyperfunctional voice disorders. Notably, however, our findings indicated that counting as a speech task induces a specific pattern which may not be comparable to other speech tasks, nor representative of spontaneous speech in every-day-life.
RESUMO
Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution of virtual voice therapy during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown in Italy via the collection of opinions of speech-language pathologists (SLPs). Methods: All SLPs who regularly carried out their professional activity in public hospitals, private hospitals, or private practices in Italy were asked to fill out an online survey consisting of two sections: (1) demographic information (age, gender, work setting, seniority, working time, and regular use of virtual voice therapy) and (2) opinions regarding telerehabilitation (motivation, personal satisfaction, effectiveness, and future needs and uses). Results: A total of 299 SLPs (mean age 39.1 ± 12.4 years) completed the survey. Overall, a regular use of virtual voice therapy was declared by 31.1% (93/299) of SLPs, with the highest prevalence for SLPs working in fully private facilities (46.7%; p < 0.001). Among all respondents, 25.4% had a highly positive opinion on the possible use of virtual voice therapy, even in nonemergency situations, and 55.8% planned to maintain this rehabilitation modality in the future. Discussion: Italian SLPs, regardless of age, had a positive impact with the new telerehabilitation practices. Investments in training and updating SLPs through specific courses would help to break down the strong barriers to telepractice acceptance, such as lack of familiarity with new technologies and lack of adequate preparation. Virtual voice therapy, which had never been experienced in such a way in Italy before the COVID-19 pandemic, promises to be a valuable future addition to the current traditional rehabilitation approaches.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: This clinical tutorial will present the concept of applying auditory-perceptual prompts (implicit instruction) typically used in voice therapy to the anatomy and physiology of the voice production system (explicit instruction) via the Estill Voice Model (EVM) and the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS). METHODS: EVM offers an integrated implicit-explicit instructional approach to voice training allowing for isolated practice of vocal structures (explicit) that interact to produce functional voice qualities (implicit), such as modal speech and louder projected voice qualities. In EVM, voice quality is correlated with the specific anatomy and physiologic adjustments via 13 Estill Figures and Options (eg, Larynx Figure has three options: High, Mid, and Low). RTSS provides a framework to connect client change in functioning (ie, target) with clinician action (ie, ingredients). Mechanisms of action connect the target to the ingredients by hypothesizing how the treatment is expected to work. RESULTS: Evidence is provided for connecting auditory-perpetual voice prompts with the anatomy and physiology of voice and supporting an integrated implicit-explicit approach to voice therapy. The concept of linking commonly used implicit auditory-perceptual prompts used in voice therapy (eg, humming, loud "aahh") to explicit anatomy and physiology training (eg, 13 Estill Figures and Options) is demonstrated using EVM and the RTSS framework with case studies and video examples. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians may choose to use anatomy and physiology of voice to define and provide explicit instruction for typically used implicit auditory-perceptual prompts. Future research is warranted to test the concept applied to voice therapy models in the literature across prevention and treatment of voice disorders.
RESUMO
Dysphonia is a prevalent condition that can impact individuals across all age groups. It occurs when normal voice quality is altered, caused by structural and/or functional issues. Evaluation and assessment from clinicians are warranted if dysphonia persists for more than four weeks and/or is coupled with risk factors or other concerning clinical manifestations. Additionally, voice disorders can increase the risk of depression and anxiety disorders, as well as raise stress levels and lower self-reported health indicators. Dysphonia can have a substantial influence on interpersonal interactions and lower overall quality of life since effective communication relies significantly on spoken language. Hence, managing dysphonia is essential for enhancing communication abilities, improving quality of life, maintaining vocational functioning, promoting psychological well-being, and addressing underlying health concerns. Speech and language therapy, medical management, surgery, or a combination of the aforementioned are all possible treatments for dysphonia. Speech and language therapy is often the first-line treatment option for dysphonia patients who do not meet the criteria for surgical intervention. Voice therapy is often beneficial and remains the first line of treatment, even when patients approach with benign vocal fold nodules. A well-designed voice therapy program improves both the quality of life and vocal performance. The majority of the studies in the existing literature advocate for and report beneficial outcomes associated with voice therapy; however, more research is needed to provide evidence-based findings to guide clinical practice and achieve optimal outcomes. This comprehensive review elaborately highlights the utilization and efficacy of various voice therapeutic modalities utilized for the management of dysphonia in light of current literature.
RESUMO
Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, our institution adopted telemedicine for voice therapy (VT) as an alternative to in-person sessions, which has been integrated into our routine practice following the pandemic. This study aims to explore factors influencing completion rates among the 2 methods. Method: A retrospective chart review at a single tertiary care institution between 2019 and 2021 was conducted. Patient zip codes were used to determine Neighborhood Atlas® Area Deprivation Index (ADI) scores and travel distance to our institution. Demographic data, Voice Handicap Index (VHI) scores, and completion status were extracted. Results: Between 2019 and 2021, 521 patients were referred to VT at our institution, with 29% opting for telemedicine VT (TVT) sessions and 71% choosing in-person sessions. Seventy-four percent was female, and average age was 57.1 years (range:10-89 years old). No statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 groups regarding sex, age, employment status, or insurance type. Participants in the TVT group demonstrated notably higher completion rates compared to the in-person group [70.0% vs 31.6% (P < .001)]. The TVT group also comprised of a higher percentage of white patients, reported longer travel distances and times to reach therapy, but had comparable ADI scores to the in-person group. Moreover, there were no significant differences in pretreatment VHI scores between the 2 groups or between those who completed therapy versus those who did not (P = .501). Conclusion: Our findings indicate that patients utilizing the telemedicine platform had significantly higher VT completion rates compared to patients appearing in person. These results highlight the importance of being able to offer telemedicine-based options in the management of voice patients.