Surveying Colombian Speech-Language Pathologists on their Reported Training & Practices of Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice

Objective: To explore the training and use of auditory perceptual evaluation of the voice reported by Colombian speech-language pathologists. Study Design: Cross-sectional observational research with a quantitative approach. Methods: A digital questionnaire was designed and distributed to gather information regarding professionals' training process and implementation of auditory-perceptual evaluation procedures. Descriptive statistics were applied, and several generalized linear models were adjusted to determine the influence of certain variables on others. Results: The survey received responses from 40 speech-language pathologists, revealing that the most used scales for training and evaluating vocal quality within this group are direct magnitude estimations (82.5% and 77.5%). Similarly, in this group, the tasks most frequently used to train and use as an evaluation strategy are vowel assessments (38%) followed by spontaneous speech (30%). Practitioners of this group were mostly trained using a conceptual framework involving multiple exposures to rating (42.5%). The use of direct magnitude estimation in training with a normal voice showed significance (p = 0.015), as did the use of the vowel /i/ in training with an equal-appearing interval (p = 0.013). The statistical models relating the scale used to the scale on which participants were trained were also significant (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The GRBAS scale is the training tool most used by the group of speech-language pathologists of the study group in Colombia. Future efforts should focus on improving training practices for auditory-perceptual evaluation, exploring alternative conceptual frameworks, and incorporating external references to enhance validity and reliability.

Objetivo: Explorar los reportes de fonoaudiólogos colombianos acerca del entrenamiento y uso de la evaluación perceptual auditiva de la voz. Diseño de estudio: Se eligió un diseño de investigación observacional transversal con un enfoque cuantitativo. Metodología: Se diseñó y distribuyó un cuestionario digital para recopilar información sobre el proceso de formación de los profesionales y la implementación de procedimientos de evaluación perceptual auditiva. Se aplicaron estadísticas descriptivas y se ajustaron varios modelos lineales generalizados para determinar la influencia de ciertas variables en otras. Resultados: La encuesta recibió respuestas de 40 fonoaudiólogos, revelando que las escalas más utilizadas para la formación y la evaluación de la calidad vocal en el grupo son las estimaciones de magnitud directa (82.5% y 77.5%). Del mismo modo, en este grupo las tareas más frecuentemente utilizadas para la formación y el uso como estrategia de evaluación son las vocales (38%), seguidas por el habla espontánea (30%). La mayoría de los profesionales del grupo fueron formados utilizando un marco conceptual que involucra múltiples exposiciones a la calificación (42.5%). El uso de la estimación de magnitud directa en la formación con una voz normal mostró significancia (p = 0.015), al igual que el uso de la vocal /i/ en la formación con intervalos de igual apariencia (p = 0.013). Los modelos estadísticos que relacionan la escala utilizada con la escala en la que los participantes fueron entrenados también fueron significativos (p < 0.05). Conclusiones: La escala GRBAS es la herramienta de formación más utilizada por el grupo de fonoaudiólogos del estudio. Los esfuerzos futuros deberían centrarse en mejorar las prácticas de formación para la evaluación perceptual auditiva, explorar marcos conceptuales alternativos e incorporar referencias externas para mejorar la validez y la confiabilidad.

Temporal and Spectral Models as Correlates to Auditory-Perceptual Judgments of Overall Severity and Listener Comfort in Tracheoesophageal Voice.

INTRODUCTION: This study pursued two objectives: (1) to determine the potential association between listener (n = 51) judgments of 20 male tracheoesophageal speaker samples for two auditory-perceptual dimensions of voice, overall severity (OS) and listener comfort (LC); and (2) to assess the temporal and spectral acoustic correlates for these auditory-perceptual dimensions. METHODOLOGY: Three separate correlation analyses were performed to evaluate the association between OS and LC. First, scores of OS and LC from all listeners were pooled together, and then the correlation between OS and LC was computed. Second, scores of OS and LC were averaged over all listeners to derive a single estimate of OS and LC for each TE speaker sample; the correlation between the average OS and LC was then computed. Third, listener-to-listener variability in the association between OS and LC was evaluated by computing the correlation between OS and LC scores from each listener across all TE samples. Finally, two stepwise multiple regression models were created to relate the average LC score to spectral and temporal variation in the acoustic signal. RESULTS: While the pooled OS and LC scores had a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.66, p < 0.00001), the averaged OS and LC exhibited a near perfect positive correlation (r = 0.99, p < 0.00001). The significant differences between the pooled and averaged scores were explained by significant listener-to-listener variability in the association between OS and LC. OS and LC scores from 5 listeners had non-significant correlations, 10 had moderate correlations (r < 0.7), 35 listeners had high correlations (0.7 < r < 0.9), and 1 listener had a very high correlation (r < 0.9 < 1). Finally, the acoustic models created based on the spectral and temporal variations in the signal were able to account for 87.7% and 61.8% of variation in the average LC score. CONCLUSIONS: The strong correlations between OS and LC suggest that LC may, in fact, provide a more comprehensive auditory-perceptual surrogate for the voice quality of TE speakers. Although OS and LC are distinct conceptual dimensions, LC appears to have the advantage of assessing the social impact and potential communication disability that may exist in interactions between TE speakers and listeners.

Comparative Study of the Effect of Experience on Auditory Processing Abilities in Voice Therapists and Other Speech-Language Pathologist in Auditory Perceptual Judgment of Voice.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effect of experience on central auditory processing skills in voice therapists and other Speech-Language Pathologists in the auditory perceptual evaluation of voice. STUDY DESIGN: This research is a descriptive-analytical cross-sectional observational study. METHODS: Our study population includes three groups; first-year speech-language pathology students who have not undergone any training or education in the evaluation of auditory samples (group 1; n = 10), Speech-Language Pathologists who do not have any activity in the field of voice disorders (group 2; n = 10), and therapists who have at least 2 years of experience in auditory-perceptual judgment (group 3; n = 10). Initially, the participants underwent a basic audiological evaluation (Pure Tone Audiometry, Speech Recognition Threshold, Speech Discrimination Score, tympanometry, and acoustic reflex) to assess peripheral hearing. In the next step, the auditory processing skills of the participants were evaluated with the Buffalo model (staggered spondaic word (SSW) test, phonemic synthesis test (PST), speech in noise (SPN) test). In the third step, four recorded voice samples of patients with voice disorders and healthy individuals were randomly selected for auditory perceptual judgment. These samples were the same for all participants. All the voices were previously subjected to auditory perceptual analysis by two Speech-Language Pathologist who had at least 6 years of experience in the evaluation and treatment of voice disorders; the voices were played for participants to assess auditory perception using the grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, strain (GRBAS) scale. RESULTS: All subjects had normal hearing and auditory processing abilities but there were some differences among the groups in processing skills. A difference was found in the SSW-qualifier and SPN-R components between the three groups. The third group had significant differences with the other two groups in the evaluation of auditory perception in the components of R, B, and S (from the GRBAS scale) in voice number one, and the components of G, R, and A in voice number three. In voice number two, there was a correlation between the SSW order effect component and the G component, as well as between the PST component and the A component. In voice number three, there was a correlation between the SPN-L component and the G component, and between the SSW condition, SSW qualifier, and SSW All errors components with the S component. In voice number four, there was a correlation between the SSW-RC, SSW-LC, SSW condition, SSW competing, and SSW order effect components with the A component. Lastly, there was a correlation between the SSW order effect and SSW type A components with the R component in voice number three in group three. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study indicate that experience has an impact on auditory processing skills and the participants of the third group, who had more experience in the evaluation of voice disorders obtained better scores than the other two groups in the auditory processing skills. Additionally, the level of experience is related to the accuracy of auditory perceptual judgment of voice. The participants of the third group performed better than the other two groups, and the performance of the first and second groups was almost the same.

Effect of Anchor Voices and Listener Expertise on Auditory-Perceptual Judgments of Voice Quality Using the GRBAS Scale.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the effect of anchor voices and listener expertise on auditory-perceptual judgment of voice quality using the GRBAS scale. METHODS: This study utilized a modified crossover design with counterbalancing. Anchor voices for each parameter of the GRBAS scale were chosen based on expert consensus. A total of 28 participants were divided into three groups based on their expertise. The first and second groups consisted of nine undergraduate (UG) and nine postgraduate (PG) students of speech-language pathology. The third group consisted of 10 practicing speech-language pathologists (SLPs). These participants carried out auditory-perceptual judgment of 60 dysphonic voice samples under two counterbalanced experimental conditions (with and without anchor voices). Each of the three groups was randomly divided into two subgroups to balance the experimental conditions. Interrater reliability for each subgroup was calculated using Krippendorff's α and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: For all the groups involved in the study, interrater reliability was higher when anchor voices aided perceptual judgment for most parameters of the GRBAS scale. For the different parameters of GRBAS, interrater reliability for the UG group varied from fair (20 < α ≤ 40) to moderate (40 < α ≤ 60). In contrast, it was fair (20 < α ≤ 40) to substantial (60 < α ≤ 80) for the PG group and moderate (40 < α ≤ 60) to substantial (60 < α ≤ 80) for the SLP group. Variations in reliability were the least for the SLP group compared to the UG and PG groups. However, there were overlaps in interrater reliability between the groups, as revealed by the 95% confidence intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Anchor voices help improve the auditory-perceptual judgment of voice quality, especially interrater reliability. Listener expertise is also shown to influence the interrater reliability of auditory-perceptual judgment of voice quality.

Cepstral and Perceptual Investigations of Voice in Speech and Language Pathologists with Vocal Fatigue.

Vocal fatigue is known as a hyperfunctional voice disorder that can lead to other conditions, such as muscle tension dysphonia (MTD). Speech and language pathologists (SLPs) are professional voice users who may suffer from vocal fatigue due to heavy vocal demands. This study aimed at investigating the cepstral and perceptual dimensions of voice and their correlation in the SLPs with vocal fatigue. Twenty-six SLPs and senior speech therapy students (mean age = 27.11 ± 6.8 yrs), including men (n = 5) and women (n = 21), participated in this descriptive cross-sectional study. They had vocal fatigue according to the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI). In acoustic assessment, cepstral analysis (CPP and CPPS) was performed using Praat software. The Persian version of Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) was used to evaluate the overall severity of dysphonia. The correlation between these two evaluations was also investigated using IBM SPSS Statistics software version 23. Results revealed that the mean CPPS (13.716 ± 2.084) was lower than the cutoff point. Perceptual findings indicated that the mean overall severity (10.557 ± 11.210) fell in the normal variability of voice quality (NVVQ) range. In addition, cepstral and perceptual evaluations had no significant correlation (P > 0/05). The findings showed that auditory-perceptual evaluation considered the gold standard method of voice evaluation, cannot solely identify vocal fatigue. However, cepstral measures can help provide a more objective profile of vocal function in SLPs with vocal fatigue. Therefore, both of these evaluations are recommended for voice assessment of vocal fatigue.

Construction of an Anchor and Training Sample Set for Auditory-Perceptual Voice Evaluation With the GRBAS-scale.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to construct a representative and comprehensive set of reliable anchor and training voice samples for all parameters and grades of the GRBAS-scale, in order to develop a standardized online training tool for perceptual voice evaluation. METHODS: 140 voice samples varying from normal to severely dysphonic, consisting of the vowel /a/ and a Dutch standard text, were recorded. Samples were duplicated and added to a data folder in random order. A panel of five highly experienced judges rated GRBAS parameters for each voice sample. Intra- and interrater reliability were determined using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and percentage agreement. Samples with agreement percentages of >0.90 for at least one parameter were qualified as anchor voices, whereas samples with a percentage agreement between 0.70 and 0.80 were considered valid training samples. RESULTS: Intrarater reliability was moderate to good for all raters and parameters. Interrater reliability was good for parameter G and moderate for R, B, A and S. 83 samples were found to be valid anchor samples with 90-100% expert agreement for at least one parameter, covering all of the GRBAS parameter/score combinations. An additional 37 samples fulfilled the criteria for adoption in the online tool as a training sample, showing 70-80% agreement for one or more parameters. CONCLUSION: Based on well-defined and stringent selection criteria, this study identifies a substantial number of valid anchor and training voices that qualify for implementation in a standardized multi-level training tool for the auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice by means of the GRBAS scale.

Effects of Vibratory Source on Auditory-Perceptual and Bio-Inspired Computational Measures of Pediatric Voice Quality.

OBJECTIVE: The vibratory source for voicing in children with dysphonia is classified into three categories including a glottal vibratory source (GVS) observed in those with vocal lesions or hyperfunction; supraglottal vibratory sources (SGVS) observed secondary to laryngeal airway injuries, malformations, or reconstruction surgeries; and a combination of both glottal and supraglottal vibratory sources called mixed vibratory source (MVS). This study evaluated the effects of vibratory source on three primary dimensions of voice quality (breathiness, roughness, and strain) in children with GVS, SGVS, and MVS using single-variable matching tasks and computational measures obtained from bio-inspired auditory models. METHODS: A total of 44 dysphonic voice samples from children aged 4-11 years were selected. Seven listeners rated breathiness, roughness, and strain of 1000-ms /ɑ/ samples using single-variable matching tasks. Computational estimates of pitch strength, amplitude modulation filterbank output, and sharpness were obtained through custom-designed MATLAB algorithms. RESULTS: Perceived roughness and strain were significantly higher in children with SGVS and MVS compared to children with GVS. Among the computational measures, only the modulation filterbank output resulted in significant differences among vibratory sources; a posthoc test revealed that children with SGVS had greater amplitude modulation than children with GVS, as expected from their rougher voice quality. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the output of an auditory amplitude modulation filterbank model may capture characteristics of SGVS that are strongly related to the rough voice quality.

Enhancing the Performance of Pathological Voice Quality Assessment System Through the Attention-Mechanism Based Neural Network.

OBJECTIVE: Doctors, nowadays, primarily use auditory-perceptual evaluation, such as the grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, and strain scale, to evaluate voice quality and determine the treatment. However, the results predicted by individual physicians often differ, because of subjective perceptions, and diagnosis time interval, if the patient's symptoms are hard to judge. Therefore, an accurate computerized pathological voice quality assessment system will improve the quality of assessment. METHOD: This study proposes a self_attention-based system, with a deep learning technology, named self_attention-based bidirectional long-short term memory (SA BiLSTM). Different pitches [low, normal, high], and vowels [/a/, /i/, /u/], were added into the proposed model, to make it learn how professional doctors evaluate the grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, and strain scale, in a high dimension view. RESULTS: The experimental results showed that the proposed system provided higher performance than the baseline system. More specifically, the macro average of the F1 score, presented as decimal, was used to compare the accuracy of classification. The (G, R, and B) of the proposed system were (0.768±0.011, 0.820±0.009, and 0.815±0.009), which is higher than the baseline systems: deep neural network (0.395±0.010, 0.312±0.019, 0.321±0.014) and convolution neural network (0.421±0.052, 0.306±0.043, 0.3250±0.032) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed system, with SA BiLSTM, pitches, and vowels, provides a more accurate way to evaluate the voice. This will be helpful for clinical voice evaluations and will improve patients' benefits from voice therapy.

Longitudinal Assessment of Singing Students.

INTRODUCTION: Singers have unique vocal demands, and if the voice is impaired there can be a negative impact on their quality of life. While a variety of options exist to assess vocal health, the utilization of cepstral peak prominence (CPP) has increased due to his reliability in some situations. However, it has not been utilized commonly in the singing population. This study sought to assess vocal health in singing students using noninvasive measures such as singing voice handicap index (SVHI) and consensus auditory perceptual evaluation of voice (CAPE-V) as well as CPP to provide preliminary information on this measure. METHODS: A prospective longitudinal study of singing students independent of year of training enrolled in a 2-credit voice lesson at an undergraduate School of Music was conducted. Non-invasive measures were used to evaluate the voice. All participants recorded the same spoken sentence at four equally spaced intervals throughout the semester using a ZOOM H4n Pro (two cardioid input microphone, Hauppauge, New Year). Participants completed SVHI at the time of each recording, and CAPE-V conducted by two speech language pathologists trained in voice. CPP was determined using running speech samples. RESULTS: A total of 23 singers completed the study (11 male, 12 female). There was a significant difference in SVHI at the first recording compared to the final recording (10.6 ± 4.6 vs 9.3 ± 5.9, P= 0.008). Similarly, there was a significant difference in CPP at the first recording compared to the final recording (9 ± 3 vs 9.4 ± 1.1, P < 0.001). However, no significant difference was seen with CAPE-V. CONCLUSION: Our results are similar to previous studies. There was no evidence in decline in objective and subjective vocal quality utilizing the measure included in our study.

Automatic GRBAS Scoring of Pathological Voices using Deep Learning and a Small Set of Labeled Voice Data.

OBJECTIVES: Auditory-perceptual evaluation frameworks, such as the grade-roughness-breathiness-asthenia-strain (GRBAS) scale, are the gold standard for the quantitative evaluation of pathological voice quality. However, the evaluation is subjective; thus, the ratings lack reproducibility due to inter- and intra-rater variation. Prior researchers have proposed deep-learning-based automatic GRBAS score estimation to address this problem. However, these methods require large amounts of labeled voice data. Therefore, this study investigates the potential of automatic GRBAS estimation using deep learning with smaller amounts of data. METHODS: A dataset consisting of 300 pathological sustained /a/ vowel samples was created and rated by eight experts (200 for training, 50 for validation, and 50 for testing). A neural network model that predicts the probability distribution of GRBAS scores from an onset-to-offset waveform was proposed. Random speed perturbation, random crop, and frequency masking were investigated as data augmentation techniques, and power, instantaneous frequency, and group delay were investigated as time-frequency representations. RESULTS: Five-fold cross-validation was conducted, and the automatic scoring performance was evaluated using the quadratic weighted Cohen's kappa. The results showed that the kappa values of the automatic scoring performance were comparable to those of the inter-rater reliability of experts for all GRBAS items and the intra-rater reliability of experts for items G, B, A, and S. Random speed perturbation was the most effective data augmentation technique overall. When data augmentation was applied, power was the most effective for items G, R, A, and S; for Item B, combining group delay and power yielded additional performance gains. CONCLUSION: The automatic GRBAS scoring achieved by the proposed model using scant labeled data was comparable to that of experts. This suggests that the challenges resulting from insufficient data can be alleviated. The findings of this study can also contribute to performance improvements in other tasks such as automatic voice disorder detection.

Cross-cultural Adaptation of the Consensus Auditory-perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Into Malay: A Validity Study.

Auditory-perceptual rating of voice is one component of voice evaluation, and the CAPE-V is one of the tools for this purpose. Because of its advantages, the CAPE-V has been adapted into several languages. Accordingly, the adaptation of the CAPE-V into Malay is essential for its utility among the Malaysian population, which this study aimed to accomplish. This study involved translating the CAPE-V into Malay, termed the Malay CAPE-V, followed by establishing its validity. The translation processes (ie, forward translation and backward translation) involved four different translators ie, three speech-language therapists (SLTs), and one linguist with at least 14 years of experience. Most items were similarly translated, except for a few, which were subsequently accepted as similar, following consensus among the translators. In the examination of content validity, two raters (ie, SLTs) with at least 12 years of clinical experience reviewed and scored the tested items. Given that the scale-level content validity index average value (S-CVI/Ave) was above the acceptable level, all items were retained. The examination of construct validity and concurrent validity involved ratings of voice samples recorded from 38 participants, comprising 19 individuals with normal and disordered voices, respectively. The ratings were performed by three raters (ie, SLTs) with at least 12 years of clinical experience. For the construct validity, the Mann-Whitney U test indicated significantly higher scores of the vocal parameters of the Malay CAPE-V for the disordered voice group than for the normal voice group. Meanwhile, for the concurrent validity, the Spearman correlation indicated that all relationships between the scores of the vocal parameters of the Malay CAPE-V and GRBAS Scale were significant, with most of them achieving a very strong positive correlation. The results demonstrated that the Malay CAPE-V is a valid tool for an auditory-perceptual rating of voice among the Malaysian population.

Perceptual Voice Qualities Database (PVQD): Database Characteristics.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a perceptual voice quality database for educational and research purposes. STUDY DESIGN: Development of a database. METHODS: A total of 296 high quality audio file recordings consisting of sustained /a/ and /i/ vowels and sentences from Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice were made in clinical environments. Nineteen experienced voice clinicians rated the audio samples using voice qualities from the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (without visual anchors) and GRBAS scales. RESULTS: The database includes samples of a wide range of voice quality severities across a wide range of speaker age and sex. Both inter- and intrarater reliabilities were established to be good for the database overall. CONCLUSIONS: The database is housed in the Mendeley Data online repository and is free for public use.

The Actor's Voice: Vocal Performance Assessment by Different Professionals.

INTRODUCTION: The voice production of actors is complex and can be assessed by different professionals. The objective of this study was to measure actor's global vocal performance (GVP) based on overall voice quality (OVQ) and overall severity (OS), by consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice (CAPE-V), and to investigate the possible correlation between these two analyses in actors without self-reported vocal complaints. METHODS: A total of 39 actors participated in this study, including 20 men and 19 women. Their ages ranged from 18 to 53 years (mean of 33.3 years), with a mean duration of eight years of professional experience. The referred actors were asked to perform predefined CAPE-V tasks and provide one voice sample in which they read a poem at normal loudness; all tasks were recorded. A professional speech-language therapist evaluated the OS based on CAPE-V vocal tasks; scores up to 35.5 mm represented normal parameters, while those from 35.6 to 50.5 mm represented mild deviation, 50.6 to 90.5 mm indicated moderate deviation, and 90.6 to 100 mm indicated severe deviation. A theater director and another speech-language therapist classified the voice samples using the OVQ scale. The OVQ was measured using a 200-mm visual analogue scale. The calculation of terciles allowed the division into three groups regarding the GVP: lowest score group; intermediate score group; and highest score group. The scores of both analyses were compared by sex and groups. Lastly, a correlation analysis was performed between the two analyses for the total sample. RESULTS: There was a significant difference among the three groups and a mild vocal deviation in the lowest score group. In addition, an inversely proportional correlation was observed between GVP and OS. No sex-related differences were observed in the scores for either analyses. CONCLUSION: The actors without self-reported voice complaints presented differences on GVP scores and their distribution was independent of sex and length of professional experience. Vocal deviation, although mild, on average was greater in actors who had the lowest scores in GVP, with an inversely proportional correlation between these two parameters.

The Use of Auditory-Perceptual Training as a Research Method: A Summary Review.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this descriptive review was to document the current state of training to perform auditory-perceptual analysis as reported in the voice literature. METHODS: A review of the literature was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-six articles were included in the review. The theoretical basis of training, specific training methods employed, duration of training, stimuli used to train, vocal qualities trained, and the type of listeners used are reported. CONCLUSION: There is wide variation to training procedures used in research including auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice quality. In order to begin to discover how to best train listeners for research and clinical settings, attention to the training methods used in research is necessary. Further, these training methods must be explicitly acknowledged and described to allow for adequate evaluation of research findings, comparison across studies, and to determine for which populations results might be applicable. The conceptual framework outlined in this study is a starting point to review voice quality research and to design future studies for which auditory-perceptual evaluation is taught to listeners.

Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Characteristics in Patients with the New Coronavirus Disease 2019.

INTRODUCTION: Due to the upper and lower respiratory involvement in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the voice quality of these patients is expected to be impaired. In this study, we aimed to conduct an auditory-perceptual evaluation of the vocal characteristics of patients with different severities of COVID-19. METHODS: One hundred two patients with mild, moderate, or severe COVID-19 as well as 30 healthy individuals were recruited to compare their respiratory/phonatory parameters. The Persian version of the CAPE-V and GRBAS scales, along with the maximum phonation time and s/z ratio values were used to evaluate the severity of respiratory/phonatory disorders during verbal tasks in the participants. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between the subgroups of patients and their healthy counterparts in all respiratory/phonatory parameters (p ≤ 0.03) except the s/z ratio (p = 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Based on auditory-perceptual assessments, patients with COVID-19 showed dysphonia. The severity of dysphonia was significantly different among patients with different severities of COVID-19. Smoking can also play a significant role in vocal dysfunction in COVID-19 patients.

Dysphonia Severity Index and Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice Outcomes, and Their Relation in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the results of the Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI) and Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) between patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and healthy subjects, as well as to investigate the correlation between DSI and CAPE-V. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty subjects, 40 COVID-19 patients (with a mean age of 41.2± 5.41) and 40 healthy subjects (with a mean age of 44.50± 3.50) participated in this study. Assessments included the DSI for aerodynamic-acoustic measurement and the Persian version of Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) for evaluating auditory-perceptual voice quality. Data were analyzed by means of the independent t-test and Pearson correlation at the 5% significance level. RESULTS: The results showed COVID-19 patients got significantly lower score in DSI compared to healthy subjects (P < 0.05). Moreover, the patients with COVID-19 had higher scores in all categories of voice production (severity, roughness, loudness, pitch, strain and breathiness) than the healthy group (P < 0.05). Comparing the result of the two voice assessments in each group revealed that there was a greater negative significant correlation in the diseased group (r p: -0.68, P: 0.001) than in the healthy group (r p: -0.37,P: 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized COVID-19 patients experience deviations in the voice quality and acoustic-aerodynamic features of their voice. Also, the results of this study showed the patient group had higher perceptual dysphonia and lower voice quality compared to the healthy group. Further studies are recommended to determine the relationship between objective and subjective voice evaluation in patients with COVID-19 after recovery.

Auditory-perceptual Assessment of Healthy and Disordered Voices Using the Voice Deviation Scale.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to (1) determine the cut-off values of the Global Severity of vocal deviation on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from the numerical scale ratings, and (2) identify the cut-off values according to different degrees of vocal deviation used by Voice-Specialized Speech-Language Pathologists (SLP). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. METHODS: The auditory-perceptual assessment was performed by four SLPs using two protocols with different scales: the VAS and the 4-point numerical scale. Among the 211 voices analyzed, 147 corresponded to female participants, and 64 corresponded to males, plus 20% repeated voice samples. Participants were between 19 and 60 years. All of them were asked to count from 1 to 10 and were recorded in a sound-proof booth. For both protocols, the judges scored the overall severity. One SLP was excluded from the analysis due to inconsistency during the perceptual assessment. RESULTS: For normal voice and mild deviations, overall severity cut-off score on the VAS was 21. For mild-moderate deviations, the cut-off was 55; and 81 points for moderate and severe deviations. The Area Under the Curve values correspond to 0.725, 0.905 and 0.851, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the VAS is a good instrument to be used during voice assessment performed by Chilean SLPs. However, it evidences possible differences in voice analysis perception with other cut-off scores performed in other countries, which can be compared to future studies.

Auditory Skills as a Predictor of Rater Reliability in the Evaluation of Vocal Quality.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an association exists between auditory skills and the reliability of judgments of the vocal deviation grade and the degrees of roughness and breathiness and to evaluate whether these skills are predictive of interrater reliability in auditory-perceptual evaluations. METHODS: The sample consisted of 20 speech-language pathology students without previous training in auditory-perceptual evaluation. The students underwent a basic audiological evaluation and a central auditory processing evaluation. They then participated in two auditory-perceptual evaluation sessions assessing the general grade (GG) and the degrees of roughness and breathiness of 44 samples of sustained vowel production with the presence or absence of dysphonia. For statistical analysis, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and a beta regression model were used. RESULTS: A difference was found in the average ICCs of the GG parameter between listeners with high and low temporal resolution and binaural interaction skills. Temporal resolution skills and binaural interaction affected the ICC of listeners in the GG evaluation, reducing the likelihood of reliability by 2.8 and 3.6 times, respectively. CONCLUSION: An association exists between temporal resolution skills and binaural interaction and the reliability of listeners in evaluations of vocal deviation severity. Listeners with low levels of these skills show less reliability in evaluations of the severity of vocal deviation. In addition, temporal resolution and binaural interaction are predictors and explain 42.7% of the variability in the reliability of evaluations of vocal deviation severity.

The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Psychometric Characteristics: II European Portuguese Version (II EP CAPE-V).

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assure a reliable and valid European Portuguese (EP) version of Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V). This resulted in the second EP version of CAPE-V (II EP CAPE-V), with permission granted by American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. STUDY DESIGN: This is a transversal, observational, descriptive, and comparative study. METHODS: Retranslation of CAPE-V into EP was reviewed by an EP linguistic expert for content validity. A total of 20 subjects: 10 male individuals (mean age = 45) and 10 female individuals (mean age = 43) formed a control group (n = 10) and a dysphonic group (n = 10) were matched by age and gender. All subjects' CAPE-V phonatory tasks were captured with PEYLE PMENI (China) microphone and recorded with TASCAM DR-05 (Tokyo, Japan). Fourteen speech-language pathologists voice experts (>5 years of clinical practice) rated 26 voice samples with 6 repeated samples added for intrarater reliability. All voice samples were heard using AKG K101 (Europe) headphones and were rated in two sessions with a 1-week interval: one with the II EP CAPE-V; and the second with the GRBAS scale to establish for inter-rater reliability and construct and concurrent validity. Statistical analysis for inter-rater reliability was obtained with the intraclass correlation coefficient. Intrarater reliability was obtained with Pearson correlation. Construct and concurrent validity were performed with Student t test and multiserial correlation coefficient, respectively. SPSS 22.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) and LISREL 8.8 (Scientific Software International, Inc, Chicago, IL) were used with significance level cut-off points: r > 0.70 and α = 0.05. RESULTS: High inter-rater reliability was obtained for all vocal parameters (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.84) revealing good equivalence. Intrarater reliability was high (r > 0.87) for overall severity, breathiness, and pitch; good (r = 0.73) for strain; and moderate (r > 0.61) for roughness and loudness. These results revealed good reproducibility and stability of the II EP CAPE-V over time. Content validity was assured by an EP linguistic expert. Construct validity was obtained for all vocal parameters (P < 0.05), except for strain (P = 0.52), revealing these were the salient parameters for rating normal and dysphonic voices samples. Concurrent validity between the II EP CAPE-V and the GRBAS scales had strong correlations (r > 0.89) for overall severity/grade, roughness, and breathiness parameters, suggesting both instruments measure the same construct. CONCLUSIONS: The II EP CAPE-V is a reliable and valid instrument for auditory-perceptual evaluation of the EP population, with all psychometric measures assured.

Influence of preoperative voice assessment on treatment plan prior to airway surgery.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Voice quality has emerged as an additional long-term outcome measure for patients with a history of airway surgery. The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of preoperative voice assessment on the surgical management of patients who required complex airway surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: We analyzed clinical data for all patients who underwent an airway reconstruction procedure from September 1, 2012 to September 1, 2017 and had a voice clinic evaluation prior to surgery at a tertiary-care pediatric hospital. Each participant underwent a full clinical voice evaluation that yielded acoustic, imaging, perceptual, and handicapping index data. RESULTS: Six hundred forty-three patients underwent 831 airway surgeries (laryngotracheoplasty, cricotracheal resection, slide tracheoplasty, laryngeal cleft repair). Ninety-one (14.2%) of the 643 patients underwent a formal voice clinic evaluation prior to airway surgery; 39/91 (42.9%) were female. The mean age was 10.4 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.2-11.6) with 31/91 (32.9%) participants demonstrating vocal fold immobility and 33/91 (36.3%) vocal fold hypomobility. A voice clinic evaluation provided new information for 62/91 (68.1%) patients, mainly for laryngeal dynamic components (vocal fold motion, source of phonation, arytenoid prolapse) and confirmed suspected disorders for the remaining patients. The average baseline Pediatric Voice Handicap Index overall score was 38.9 (95% CI: 33.3-44.5), and the average overall severity rating of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice was 54 (95% CI: 45.2-62.8). A voice clinic evaluation influenced management of 56/91 (61.5%) patients either by modification of the surgical plan (26/56, 46%) and/or adjusting voice therapy (21/56, 37.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Voice evaluation prior to airway reconstruction provided key information that influenced the management for most of the patients. Formal voice evaluation should be considered prior to complex airway surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 128:2858-2863, 2018.