RESUMO
RATIONALE: A small number of earlier studies have suggested an effect of temporary abstinence campaigns on alcohol consumption. However, all were based on self-reported consumption estimates. OBJECTIVES: Using a time series of 23-year monthly alcohol sales data, this study examined the effect of an annual temporary abstinence campaign, which has been organised annually since 2003 during the Buddhist Lent period (spanning 3 months), on population-level alcohol consumption. METHODS: Data used in the analysis included a time series of monthly alcohol sales data from January 1995 to September 2017 and the midyear population counts for those years. Generalised additive models (GAM) were applied to estimate trends as smooth functions of time, while identifying a relationship between the Buddhist Lent abstinence campaigns on alcohol consumption. The sensitivity analysis was performed using a seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average with exogenous variables (SARIMAX) model. INTERVENTION: The Buddhist Lent abstinence campaign is a national mass media campaign combined with community-based activities that encourages alcohol abstinence during the Buddhist Lent period, spanning 3 months and varying between July and October depending on the lunar calendar. The campaign has been organised annually since 2003. MAIN OUTCOME: Per capita alcohol consumption using monthly alcohol sales data divided by the midyear total population number used as a proxy. RESULTS: Median monthly per capita consumption was 0.43 (IQR: 0.37 to 0.51) litres of pure alcohol. Over the study period, two peaks of alcohol consumption were in March and December of each year. The significant difference between before-campaign and after-campaign coefficients in the GAM, -0.102 (95% CI: -0.163 to -0.042), indicated an effect of the campaign on alcohol consumption after adjusting for the time trend and monthly seasonality, corresponding to an average reduction of 9.97% (95% CI: 3.65% to 24.18%). The sensitivity analyses produced similar results, where the campaign was associated with a decrease in consumption of 8.1% (95% CI: 0.4% to 15.7%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the temporary abstinence campaign was associated with a decrease in population-level alcohol consumption during campaign periods. The finding contributed to a growing body of evidence on the effectiveness of emerging temporary abstinence campaigns.
Assuntos
Abstinência de Álcool , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas , Promoção da Saúde , Humanos , Tailândia/epidemiologia , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/epidemiologia , Abstinência de Álcool/estatística & dados numéricos , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Budismo , Masculino , Comércio/estatística & dados numéricos , FemininoRESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Early liver transplantation (LT) for alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) has increased worldwide. Short-term outcomes have been favorable, but data on longer-term outcomes are lacking. METHODS: Single-center retrospective study of primary LT recipients between 2010 and 2020, with follow-up through July 1, 2022. Survival analysis was performed using log rank, Cox models, and Kaplan-Meier method. Cox models were created to identify variables associated with mortality; logistic regression to identify variables associated with post-LT alcohol use. RESULTS: Of 708 patients who underwent LT, 110 (15.5%) had ALD and abstinence <6 months prior to LT (ELT), 234 (33.1%) had ALD and alcohol abstinence >6 months (SLT), and 364 (51.4%) had non-ALD diagnoses. Median follow-up was 4.6 years (interquartile range, 2.6-7.3 years). ELT recipients were younger (P = .001) with median abstinence pre-LT of 61.5 days. On adjusted Cox model, post-LT survival was similar in ELT and SLT (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; P = .30) and superior to non-ALD (HR, 1.68; P = .04). Alcohol use (40.9% vs 21.8%; P < .001) and harmful alcohol use (31.2% vs 16.0%; P = .002) were more common in ELT recipients. Harmful alcohol use was associated with post-LT mortality on univariate (HR, 1.69; P = .03), but not multivariable regression (HR, 1.54; P = .10). Recurrence of decompensated ALD trended toward more common in ELT (9.1% vs 4.4%; P = .09). Greater than 6 months pre-LT abstinence was associated with a decreased risk of harmful alcohol use (odds ratio, 0.42; P = .001), but not in a multivariable model (odds ratio, 0.71; P = .33). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo ELT for ALD have similar or better survival than other diagnoses in the first 10 years after LT despite a higher incidence of post-LT alcohol use.
Assuntos
Alcoolismo , Hepatopatias Alcoólicas , Transplante de Fígado , Humanos , Transplante de Fígado/mortalidade , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hepatopatias Alcoólicas/cirurgia , Hepatopatias Alcoólicas/mortalidade , Hepatopatias Alcoólicas/epidemiologia , Alcoolismo/complicações , Adulto , Abstinência de Álcool/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Although attending substance use-focused mutual-help meetings online may reduce attendance barriers, associations of attendance mode with group participation and outcomes are unknown. Using longitudinal data from mutual-help group attendees, this study, after identifying differences in baseline characteristics by attendance mode, examined associations of attendance mode with mutual-help participation (number of meetings attended, involvement) and outcomes (alcohol abstinence, heavy drinking, alcohol problems). METHODS: The Peer Alternatives for Addiction Study 2021 Cohort sampled attendees of 12-step groups (e.g., Alcoholics Anonymous), Women for Sobriety, LifeRing Secular Recovery, and/or SMART Recovery in-person and/or online within 30 days before baseline. The baseline sample, recruited in fall 2021, was 531 adults with lifetime alcohol use disorder, followed at 6 (88 %) and 12 months (85 %). Differences in baseline characteristics by attendance mode were tested using Chi-squares and ANOVAs. GEE models examined associations of attendance mode, time, and their interactions with mutual-help group participation and alcohol outcomes. The in-person only mode was compared to the online-only, and to the in-person plus online, modes. RESULTS: At baseline, 53.7 % of participants had attended only online meetings in the past 30 days, 33.7 % had attended both in-person and online meetings, and 12.6 % had attended only in-person meetings. Online meeting attendees were less likely to endorse lifetime abstinence as an alcohol recovery goal than in-person-only meeting attendees. In adjusted models (including for recovery goal), those attending online meetings only, or both online and in-person meetings, attended a greater number of meetings compared to those attending only in-person meetings. However, online-only attendance was associated with less involvement than in-person-only attendance. In adjusted models, compared to baseline, involvement increased and outcomes improved at follow-ups. Adjusted models examining alcohol outcomes found that no attendance at mutual-help groups at follow-ups was associated with more heavy drinking compared to in-person-only attendance. CONCLUSIONS: Findings inform efforts to ascertain benefits of mutual-help group participation by suggesting that online attendance is associated with attending more meetings, less involvement, and lower endorsement of abstinence as a recovery goal, and is comparable to in-person attendance on alcohol outcomes. In-person attendance may be more beneficial for less heavy drinking than terminating attendance.
Assuntos
Abstinência de Álcool , Alcoolismo , Grupos de Autoajuda , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Longitudinais , Grupos de Autoajuda/estatística & dados numéricos , Alcoolismo/epidemiologia , Alcoolismo/terapia , Alcoolismo/psicologia , Adulto , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Abstinência de Álcool/estatística & dados numéricos , Alcoólicos Anônimos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Systematic reviews of the relationship between alcohol consumption and all-cause mortality have reported different relative risk (RR) curves, possibly due to the choice of reference group. Results have varied from 'J-shaped' curves, where low-volume consumption is associated with reduced risk, to monotonically increased risk with increasing consumption. We summarised the evidence on alcohol consumption and all-cause mortality exclusively from systematic reviews using lifetime abstainers or low-volume/occasional drinkers as the reference group. METHODS: We conducted a systematic umbrella review of systematic reviews of the relationship between alcohol consumption and all-cause mortality in prospective cohort studies using a reference group of lifetime abstainers or low-volume/occasional drinkers. Several databases (PubMed/Medline/Embase/PsycINFO/Cochrane Library) were searched to March 2022. Reviews were assessed for risk of bias, and those with reference groups containing former drinkers were excluded. RESULTS: From 2149 articles retrieved, 25 systematic reviews were identified, and five did not include former drinkers in the reference group. Four of the five included reviews had high risk of bias. Three reviews reported a J-shaped relationship between alcohol consumption and all-cause mortality with significant decreased risk for low-volume drinking (RR range 0.84 to 0.95), while two reviews did not. The one review at low risk of bias reported monotonically increased risk with greater consumption (RRs = 1.02, 1.13, 1.33 and 1.52 for low-, medium-, high- and higher-volume drinking, respectively, compared with occasional drinking). All five reviews reported significantly increased risk with higher levels of alcohol consumption (RR range 1.28 to 3.70). Sub-group analyses were reported by sex and age; however, there were evidence gaps for many important factors. Conversely, 17 of 20 excluded systematic reviews reported decreased mortality risk for low-volume drinking. CONCLUSIONS: Over 70% of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published to March 2022 of all-cause mortality risk associated with alcohol consumption did not exclude former drinkers from the reference group and may therefore be biased by the 'sick-quitter effect'.
Assuntos
Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas , Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Abstinência de Álcool/estatística & dados numéricos , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/mortalidade , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/epidemiologia , Causas de Morte , MortalidadeAssuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Adulto Jovem , Alcoolismo/tratamento farmacológico , Gabapentina/uso terapêutico , Placebos/uso terapêutico , Riboflavina/administração & dosagem , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/efeitos adversos , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/tratamento farmacológico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Bebidas Alcoólicas/análise , Alcoolismo/sangue , Adesão à Medicação/psicologia , Abstinência de Álcool/estatística & dados numéricos , Gabapentina/administração & dosagemRESUMO
Resumo Este estudo teve por objetivo comparar o perfil de mortalidade por causas externas entre Adventistas do Sétimo Dia e população geral do Espírito Santo no período de 2003 a 2009. Realizou-se busca dos Adventistas no banco nominal do Sistema de Informação sobre Mortalidade de posse das informações dos Adventistas fornecidas pelas sedes administrativas da instituição. Os óbitos por causas externas ocorridos no período estudado foram então separados em dois grupos: Adventistas e população geral. Os Adventistas apresentaram menor mortalidade proporcional por causas externas (10%) que a população geral (19%), sendo o sexo masculino o principal responsável por essa diferença. Em ambos os grupos os óbitos predominaram na faixa de 20 a 29 anos. As mortes por causas acidentais foram mais expressivas entre os Adventistas (68,08%) enquanto as mortes por causas intencionais relacionadas às agressões e lesões autoprovocadas foram mais significativas na população geral (53,67% de todas as mortes). A razão de mortalidade padronizada para as causas externas foi 41,3, sendo assim ser Adventista reduziu a mortalidade em 58,7%. Acredita-se que o benefício dos Adventistas verificado em relação à mortalidade por causas externas possa estar relacionado à recomendação de abstinência do consumo de álcool por esse grupo.
Abstract This paper aimed to compare the profile of mortality from external causes among Seventh-day Adventists and the general population of Espírito Santo from 2003 to 2009. A search of Adventists was performed in the nominal database of the Mortality Information System containing data on Adventists provided by the administrative offices of the institution. Deaths from external causes occurred during the study period were then divided into two groups: Adventists and the general population. Adventists had lower proportional mortality from external causes (10%) than the general population (19%), and males were the main reason for this difference. In both groups, deaths prevailed in the 20-29 years age group. Deaths from accidental causes were most significant among Adventists (68.08%), while deaths from intentional causes related to assault and self-inflicted injuries were more significant in the general population (53.67% of all deaths). The standardized mortality ratio for external causes was 41.3, thus, being Adventist reduced mortality by 58.7%. It is believed that the benefit of Adventists observed for mortality from external causes is related to this group's abstinence from alcohol consumption.