CABTREOTM (Clindamycin Phosphate, Adapalene, and Benzoyl Peroxide) Topical Gel.

CabtreoTM (1.2% clindamycin phosphate, 0.15% adapalene, and 3.1% benzoyl peroxide) or IDP-126 topical gel was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in October 2023 for the treatment of moderate to severe acne vulgaris in patients aged ≥12 years. Its effectiveness and safety were evaluated in two phase 3 trials (Trial 1 and Trial 2). In both trials, subjects were randomized into two groups, one received IDP-126 gel and the other received vehicle gel. The primary efficacy end point was treatment success at week 12, defined as subjects achieving at least a 2-grade reduction from baseline in Evaluator's Global Severity Score (EGGS) and a final score ranging from 0 (clear) to 1 (almost clear) as well as reduced counts of inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesions. In Trial 1 (N = 183), treatment success was achieved in 49.6% (61/122) of subjects in the IDP-126 group versus 24.9% (15/61) of subjects in the vehicle group (P < 0.01). In Trial 2 (N = 180), treatment success was achieved in 50.5% (61/120) of subjects in the IDP-126 group versus 20.5% (12/60) of subjects in the vehicle group (P < 0.01). IDP-126 is therefore recommended to be applied as a thin layer to the affected area once daily.

Investigation of the effect of adapalene 0.3%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel in Korean patients with acne: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial, with a histopathological and immunohistochemical study.

BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris poses significant physical and psychological challenges worldwide. Data of adapalene 0.3%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel (A0.3/BPO2.5) for acne treatment in Asian patients is limited. METHODS: In this randomized double-blind clinical trial, 49 Korean patients with moderate-to-severe acne and scars were assigned to the A0.3/BPO2.5 (N.=37) or vehicle (N.=12) group. Acne and acne scar severity scores were assessed at baseline and 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks. The primary outcomes were treatment success rate (reduction of ≥2 Investigator's Global Assessment grade and reaching a grade of 0 or 1) and proportional acne lesion and scar count reduction against the baseline. To assess histological changes, 2-mm punch biopsies were performed at baseline and week 24 on the respective inflammatory lesions or scars. RESULTS: At week 24, the A0.3/BPO2.5 group had a significantly higher treatment success rate than the vehicle group. The total acne count, inflammatory lesion count, and non-inflammatory lesion count percentages (against baselines) with A0.3/BPO2.5 and the vehicle were 12.1% vs. 96.7%, 8.0% vs. 101.2%, and 13.3% vs. 98.9%, respectively (all P<0.001). Scar count percentages (against baselines) with A0.3/BPO2.5 and the vehicle were 27.3% and 96.5%, respectively (P<0.001). Significant elevations in collagen 1 and 3, elastin, CK15, and p63 levels, with increases of 172.7%, 230.6%, 176.5%, 286.2%, and 105.9%, respectively, in comparison to baseline (all P<0.05). No major adverse events leading to discontinuation were observed. CONCLUSIONS: A0.3/BPO2.5 was an effective and safe treatment for acne and acne scars in Asian patients supported by robust histopathological and immunohistochemical evidence.

Effects of Malaysian thermal spring water as adjunct therapy for mild to moderate acne vulgaris - a prospective, randomised, controlled, split face study.

INTRODUCTION: Acne is a common skin disease with a high psychosocial burden, affecting mostly adolescents and youth worldwide. Management of acne is often challenged by cutaneous side effects that leads to therapeutic intolerance, poor compliance and impaired efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-centre, evaluatorblinded, split-face, randomised study investigating the effects of thermal spring water (TSW) in improving efficacy and tolerability of standard acne therapy. Total of 31 participants with mild-to-moderate acne were recruited and subjected to TSW spray to one side of the face 4 times daily for 6 weeks in addition to standard therapy. The other side received standard therapy only. RESULTS: Six (19.4%) males and 25 (80.6%) female with mean age 25.1±6.13 participated, 15 (48.4%) had mild acne while 16 (51.6%) had moderate acne. Seven (22.6%) were on oral antibiotics, 25 (80.6%) used adapalene, 6 (19.4%) tretinoin and 21 (67.7%) benzoyl peroxide. Skin hydration improved and better on spring water treated side with mean difference12.41±30.31, p = 0.04 at the forehead, 39.52±65.14, p < 0.01 at the cheek and 42.172±71.71, p < 0.01 at the jaw at week 6. Participants also report significant reduction in dryness at the treated side at week 6, mean difference 0.93±0.10, p < 0.001. TEWL, sebum and pH were comparable on both sides with no significant differences. Tolerability towards standard therapy improved as early week 2 with reduction of stinging following application of topical therapy (mean difference 0.62±1.43, p = 0.03), increase in skin feeling good (-1.79±1.70, p < 0.001) and skin suppleness (0.62±1.43, p < 0.001). These improvements were significantly maintained till week 6. Cardiff acne disability index significantly improved at week 6 (p<0.001) despite no significant changes in Comprehensive Acne Severity Scale score before and after treatment. CONCLUSION: TSW may have a role as an adjunct to standard acne therapy by improving hydration, acne disability index and tolerability towards standard topical treatment.

Mechanism of action of adapalene for treating EGFR-TKI-induced skin disorder.

BACKGROUND: Skin disorders are the most common side effect associated with epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapy. It is important to manage skin lesions. Adapalene has been used to treat skin lesions caused by EGFR-TKIs in some cases. The aim of this study was to investigate the functional mechanism of adapalene in erlotinib-induced skin disorder. METHODS: To analyze the effect of adapalene on skin rash, afatinib and adapalene were administered to mice. The relationship between the concentration of adapalene and skin disorders was also examined by analyzing AQP3 expression. A skin lesion model was experimentally established in human skin keratinocytes (HaCaT) by using erlotinib with TNF-α and IL-1ß. We used qRT-PCR to analyze chemokine-induced inflammation and western blotting to analyze the effects of adapalene on the NF-κB signaling pathway. Antimicrobial peptides and adhesion factors were also examined using qRT-PCR. RESULTS: Mice administered 0.01% adapalene had less skin inflammation than mice treated with afatinib alone. The expression level of AQP3 decreased in an adapalene concentration-dependent manner. The mRNA levels of proinflammatory cytokines such as CCL2 and CCL27 in HaCaT cells were significantly reduced by adapalene. The expression of an antimicrobial peptide, hBD3, was upregulated after adapalene treatment. Adhesion factors, such as E-cadherin, were significantly downregulated by EGFR-TKI and significantly upregulated by adapalene treatment. Western blot analysis suggested that erlotinib-induced phosphorylation of p65 was decreased by adapalene. CONCLUSION: We suggest that adapalene may be a possible treatment option for skin disorders induced by EGFR-TKIs.

Efficacy and safety of adapalene gel as a reactive treatment for cetuximab-induced skin toxicity in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A historical cohort comparison study.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the common occurrence of cetuximab (Cmab)-induced skin toxicity, management strategies are not well established. The traditional mainstay method consists of topical steroids, which, if used excessively, may give rise to other concerns. Alternatively, adapalene can activate epidermal growth factor receptor pathways to potentially alleviate these toxicities. METHODS: We prospectively studied 31 patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN) who were eligible to use adapalene gel as a reactive treatment for topical steroid-refractory skin toxicity. For comparison, we retrospectively reviewed 99 patients with R/M SCCHN (historical control cohort) whose skin toxicity was mainly treated with topical steroids. We compared the frequency and severity of Cmab-induced skin toxicity, Cmab therapy status (e.g., dose modification), side effects caused by topical steroids and adapalene gel itself, and other medical interventions. RESULTS: Adapalene gel was used by eight patients (25.8%) in the prospective cohort. Patients in the historical control cohort more frequently required escalation of topical steroid potency (34.3% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.022). Although there was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of grade ≥3 facial skin rash and paronychia between the two cohorts, the prospective cohort showed a significantly shorter time to complete recovery from grade 2/3 paronychia (16 vs. 47 days, p = 0.017). Further, while no skin infections were observed in the prospective cohort, 13 patients in the historical control cohort developed skin infections, especially periungual infection (0% vs. 13.1%, p = 0.024). In addition, no patients in the prospective cohort received a dose reduction of Cmab due to skin toxicities, compared to 20 patients in the historical control cohort (0% vs. 20.2%, p = 0.003). No apparent adapalene gel-related side effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Adapalene gel may be an effective management option for topical steroid-refractory Cmab-induced skin toxicities and could improve compliance with Cmab therapy.

Efficacy and safety of calcipotriol as a potential topical treatment of acne vulgaris: a randomized, controlled, triple blinded, split-face clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris is a common skin problem that may result in significant scarring and systemic comorbidities. Adverse effects and increasing resistance to available treatments urge the development of new therapeutics. Topical vitamin D analogues have been successfully used in psoriasis; however, the efficacy and safety of calcipotriol as a potential topical treatment of acne is yet to be established. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of calcipotriol in treating acne compared with adapalene and placebo. METHODS: Sixty patients with acne were included and randomly divided into two groups of 30 patients each. Group I participants were treated by daily application of calcipotriol 0.005% cream on one facial side vs. placebo (petrolatum) over the other side. Group II were treated by daily application of adapalene 0.1% gel over one facial side vs. calcipotriol on the other. Therapeutic response was evaluated using the Japanese Acne Grading System (JAGS) and through photographic evaluation using Mean Improvement Score by Physician. RESULTS: Adapalene-treated skin gave the greatest improvement and the highest patient satisfaction compared with skin treated with calcipotriol or placebo (P = 0.001). Nonetheless, the calcipotriol-treated side showed a significantly greater reduction in post-treatment JAGS score and much greater satisfaction than placebo. As treatment continued, improved tolerability to calcipotriol was noted, with comparable side-effects between the three study arms. CONCLUSIONS: Calcipotriol seems to be a promising new safe topical therapeutic option for acne. However, adapalene is still superior in efficacy, tolerability and patient satisfaction.

Targeting AR-positive breast cancer cells via drug repurposing approach.

Androgen Receptor (AR) is overexpressed in almost all the molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Besides aiding the tumorigenic environment of cancer by abnormal cell proliferation, AR also takes part in promoting cancer signaling pathways, thereby promoting aggressiveness. In this study, AR was selected as the target protein in breast cancer cells. Following this, a library of 1293 FDA-approved drugs was screened via molecular docking, MD simulation, and MMPBSA binding energy. Amongst the library of compounds, Adapalene exhibited the least binding energy of (-10.2 kCal/mol) in comparison to that of the chosen reference compound, Nilutamide (-8.6 kCal/mol). Furthermore, the in vitro efficacy of Adapalene was also determined in two different breast cancer cell lines such as MCF7 (AR-positive/ER-positive) and MDA-MB-231 (AR negative/TNBC). Initially, the cell viability assay (MTT) was performed, which endowed us with a lesser IC50 value of Adapalene in comparison to Nilutamide in both cell lines. The IC50 of Adapalene was found to be 12 µM and 39.4 µM in MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 cells, respectively. Furthermore, Adapalene also induced cellular ROS and apoptosis by 3.5-fold and 26.58% in MCF7 cells. However, the overall effect of Adapalene was significantly lower in the case of MDA-MB-231 cell lines, which could be attributed to its inherent nature of the absence of hormone receptors. Conclusively, Adapalene possesses greater therapeutic efficacy in comparison to the control drug, thereby hinting towards the potential use of Adapalene in the treatment of AR-positive breast cancer.

A dermocosmetic regimen is able to mitigate skin sensitivity induced by a retinoid-based fixed combination treatment for acne: Results of a randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Topical retinoids cause retinoid-induced skin discomfort (RISD) mainly during the first weeks of use leading to noncompliance and premature treatment discontinuation. A dermocosmetic (DC) may help to reduce treatment-related signs and symptoms and improve adherence. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefit of a DC regimen compared to a routine skin care regimen (RC) by reducing RISD signs and symptoms induced by a retinoid/benzoyl peroxide fixed-drug combination in subjects with acne. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Double-blind, randomized, comparative study in subjects ≥16 years with mild to moderate acne candidates to a topical adapalene/BPO fixed drug combination (A/BPO). Evaluations took place at Day 0, 7, 14, 28, and 84 and included erythema, desquamation, burning, itching and stinging and RISD (SD, a composite score of local treatment-related signs and symptoms and acne severity. Subjects used daily the DC or RC together with the fixed combination for 84 days. RESULTS: Eighty-eight subjects were included, the mean age was 21 years; 84% were females. At Day 0 the SD score was 0.8 in both groups. A statistically significant difference in terms of skin sensitivity with DC compared to RC (1.6 points, vs. 2.4 points p < 0.05) was observed at Day 14. Clinical sign and symptom scores were more reduced with DC than with RC at all time points. Acne severity improved in both groups. CONCLUSION: DC significantly reduces A/BPO-related RISD compared to RC, especially during the first 14 days of treatment, without interfering with the clinical efficacy of the treatment, thus helping to maintain treatment adherence.

From Breakouts to Bargains: Strategies for Patient-Centered, Cost-effective Acne Care.

A range of treatment options are available for both mild to moderate and moderate to severe acne, and these options vary widely in their clinical uses, effectiveness, and costs. With the continued rise of dermatologic drug prices and increased cost-sharing due to high-deductible health plans, the importance of cost-effective treatment continues to grow. Failure to consider cost-effective, patient-centered care may lead to increased financial toxicity, reduced adherence, and ultimately worse outcomes and patient satisfaction. Combination topical products offer improved efficacy and convenience, which are associated with better adherence and outcomes. Generic fixed-dose adapalene-benzoyl peroxide (BPO) and fixed-dose clindamycin-BPO can be highly cost-effective options for patients with mild to moderate acne. Hormonal agents such as combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and spironolactone are inexpensive and likely reflect a highly cost-effective option that could reduce reliance on oral antibiotics in patients with moderate to severe acne. Doxycycline and isotretinoin also are cost-effective options for more severe acne. Frequent laboratory monitoring for spironolactone and isotretinoin continues to be prevalent despite little evidence to support its clinical utility, and it is associated with a major cost burden to the patient and health care system. The reduction of laboratory monitoring is an opportunity to provide higher-value care.

Evaluation of the efficacy of maintenance therapy for acne vulgaris using adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel and benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel for 24 weeks and assessment of atrophic acne scars using three-dimensional image analysis.

Maintenance therapy after remission of inflammation is strongly recommended in the guideline for the treatment of acne vulgaris published by the Japanese Dermatological Association. One advantage of continuing maintenance therapy is the alleviation of atrophic scarring. This study investigated the efficacy of maintenance therapy using adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel and benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel, and its effects on atrophic scarring. Overall, 126 patients were randomized to the adapalene/benzoyl peroxide group (n = 40), benzoyl peroxide group (n = 44), and control group (without maintenance treatment drugs; n = 42), and 111 of these completed a trial lasting 24 weeks. As the primary endpoint, the treatment success rate (the percentage of patients in whom the number of inflammatory lesions was maintained at ≤10) was 89.2% in the adapalene/benzoyl peroxide group, 87.5% in the benzoyl peroxide group, and 47.4% in the control group. Compared with the control group, the success rates were significantly higher in the adapalene/benzoyl peroxide and benzoyl peroxide groups (P = 0.0006 for both). As one of the secondary endpoints, the rate of change in the number of atrophic scars showed significant improvement from the baseline in the adapalene/benzoyl peroxide and benzoyl peroxide groups at week 24 (P = 0.0004 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Although the three-dimensional image analysis parameters did not change significantly from the baseline in the adapalene/benzoyl peroxide and benzoyl peroxide groups at week 24, significant worsening was noted in the control group (P = 0.0276 for affected area, P = 0.0445 for volume, and P = 0.0182 for maximum depth). Adverse drug reactions were noted in three patients in the adapalene/benzoyl peroxide group (7.5%) but not in the benzoyl peroxide group. These findings suggest that maintenance therapy using adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel and benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel is effective in preventing the worsening of scars in Japanese patients with acne vulgaris.

Triple-combination clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/benzoyl peroxide 3.1%/adapalene 0.15% gel for moderate-to-severe acne in children and adolescents: Randomized phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Topical clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/benzoyl peroxide 3.1%/adapalene 0.15% gel (IDP-126) is the first fixed-dose triple-combination formulation in development for acne. This post hoc analysis investigated efficacy and safety of IDP-126 in children and adolescents with moderate-to-severe acne. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind phase 2 study (NCT03170388), participants ≥9 years of age with moderate-to-severe acne were eligible for randomization (1:1:1:1:1) to once-daily IDP-126, one of three dyad combination gels, or vehicle gel for 12 weeks. This post hoc analysis of pediatric participants (n = 394) included children and adolescents up to 17 years of age. Assessments included treatment success, inflammatory/noninflammatory lesion counts, Acne-Specific Quality of Life (Acne-QoL) questionnaire, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and cutaneous safety/tolerability. RESULTS: At Week 12, treatment success rates were significantly greater with IDP-126 (55.8%) than with vehicle (5.7%; p < .001) or any of the dyad combinations (range: 30.8%-33.9%; p < .01, all). Lesion reductions with IDP-126 were also significantly greater than with vehicle (inflammatory: 78.3% vs. 45.1%; noninflammatory: 70.0% vs. 37.6%; p < .001, both) and 9.2%-16.6% greater than with any of the dyad combinations. Increases (improvements) from baseline in Acne-QoL domain scores were generally greater with IDP-126 than in any other treatment group. The most common treatment-related TEAEs across treatment groups were application site pain and dryness. Most treatment-related TEAEs were of mild-to-moderate severity. CONCLUSION: IDP-126 gel-a novel fixed-dose, triple-combination topical formulation for acne-demonstrated superior efficacy to vehicle and three dyad component gels and was well tolerated in children and adolescents with moderate-to-severe acne.

Comparison Of Efficacy Of Topical Adapalene Plus Oral Azithromycin And Topical Adapalene Plus Oral Doxycycline In Treatment Of Acne Vulgaris.

BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris is a commonly diagnosed dermatological condition characterised by pilosebaceous unit blockage or inflammation. It may manifest as inflammatory, non-inflammatory, or a combination of the two. The acne vulgaris mostly the face of individual and chest and back of individual is also affected sometime. The aim of my research is to compare the effectiveness of topical adapalene plus oral azithromycin versus topical adapalene plus oral doxycycline in treating acne. Acne is one of most common reason compelling a patient to see dermatological advice. Our goal is to find the most effective antibiotic to produce the best outcomes with the fewest possible unwanted effect (side effects) and a maximum level of patient satisfaction. METHODS: From May 1 to October 31, 2019, a randomised control trial was performed at Dermatology department MTI Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar. Using the lottery form, all of the patients were split into 2 groups. For 12 weeks, patients in Group A were given oral doxycycline 100 mg once daily and topical adapalene, while patients in Group B were given oral azithromycin 250 mg on alternating days and topical adapalene. All patients were followed at the end of 12 weeks after start of therapy to determine the efficacy in term of clearance of at least 60% of the number of lesions from baseline. RESULTS: In Group A, 22 (59.45%) patients expressed positive results whereas in Group B, only 9 (24.32%) patients expressed positive results. p value (0.0021.). CONCLUSIONS: My data suggest that oral doxycycline 100mg in combination with adapalene gave better results as compared to oral azithromycin which was also found well-tolerated option for treatment of acne on face.

Comparison Of Topical 0.1% Adapalene Gel Versus Cryotherapy In Patients With Plantar Warts.

BACKGROUND: Plantar wart is a common viral infection of the plantar surface of the foot. Multiple treatment modalities are available but there is no definitive management option. The aim of this study is to compare topical adapalene gel 0.1% with cryotherapy in patients presenting with plantar warts in terms of time taken for complete clearance of the lesions. METHODS: The study was conducted at the Department of Dermatology, PNS Shifa Hospital, Karachi from 28th April to 28th October 2020. Eighty-four patients with plantar warts who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study. Approval from the institutional ethical review committee was sought and written informed consent was taken from all the patients. Patients were divided into two groups, A (Adapalene 0.1% gel) and B (Cryotherapy) of 42 patients each. Adapalene gel was applied twice daily under occlusion at home and cryotherapy was done at the clinic after every two weeks. Patients were followed weekly from the onset of treatment and days taken for complete clearance of plantar warts were noted. Both the groups were compared for the outcome, i.e., time taken for complete clearance of lesions. RESULTS: The mean time for complete clearance of plantar warts in group A was 35.619±3.154 days and in group B, it was 50.404±3.178 days. CONCLUSIONS: Adapalene gel 0.1% used for the treatment of plantar warts helped in complete clearance of lesions faster than cryotherapy.

Influence of moisturizer containing licochalcone A, 1,2-decanediol, L-carnitine, and salicylic acid on facial skin lipidome among seborrhea participants.

BACKGROUND: A better understanding of skin lipidomics and its alteration under treatment administration might offer therapeutic solutions for seborrhea. AIMS: To quantitatively and qualitatively explore the lipid-modifying effect of the moisturizer containing licochalcone A, 1,2-decanediol, L-carnitine, and salicylic acid (LDCS) in seborrhea participants with and without acne vulgaris (AV). PATIENTS/METHODS: We conducted an open-label explorative study on 20 seborrhea participants (10 AV and 10 non-AV). All participants applied LDCS for 8 weeks with the addition of benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel and adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel in AV. Skin surface lipid (SSL) assessments were performed biweekly, using Sebumeter® and lipid-absorbent Sebutapes® to collect forehead SSL for profile analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). RESULTS: SSL amount significantly decreased since week 2 in AV (p-value = 0.0124) and week 6 in non-AV (p-value = 0.0098), respectively. Twenty-two important SSLs were annotated from GC-MS analysis, comprising 19 free fatty acids, cholesterol, squalene, and glycerol. There was a significant reduction in 5 and 13 lipid components in AV and non-AV groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: LDCS, either alone or with topical acne treatment, demonstrated substantial sebusuppressive and lipid-modifying effects among seborrhea participants.

Drug repurposing of adapalene for melanoma treatment.

Cancer drug repurposing is an attractive approach that leads to savings in time and investment. Adapalene, the first medical application of which was for the treatment of acne, has been described as a repurposing drug for the treatment of various types of cancer. Patent application CN111329851 describes the use of adapalene for the treatment of melanoma, by assays carried out on melanoma cell lines. Adapalene demonstrated antiproliferative activity in melanoma cell lines via S-phase arrest-dependent apoptosis mediated by DNA damage through an increase in the expression of p-ATM and p-chk2 and a decrease in the expression of p-BRCA1 and Rad51. Even though no evidence on efficacy and efficiency is shown in preclinical and clinical studies, CN111329851 patent shows that adapalene may be a repurposing drug for the treatment of melanoma.

A topical gel of tea tree oil nanoemulsion containing adapalene versus adapalene marketed gel in patients with acne vulgaris: a randomized clinical trial.

Adapalene is used for treatment of acne vulgaris, a common dermatological disease. Nano-based carriers have been developed to improve solubility and bioavailability of adapalene and other acne treatment drugs. In our previous report, tea tree oil nanoemulsion containing adapalene gel (TTO NE + ADA Gel) showed appropriate physical and biological properties such as stability, viscosity, pH, size, morphology and biocompatibility in an animal model. The present study was designed to assess efficacy and safety of the TTO NE + ADA Gel in comparison with 0.1% adapalene marketed gel (ADA Marketed Gel). A total of 100 patients were randomized to receive TTO NE + ADA Gel or ADA Marketed Gel, once daily at night, for 12 weeks. Analysis for efficacy was conducted by acne lesion count (total, inflammatory and non-inflammatory) and acne severity index at weeks 4, 8 and 12 using generalized estimating equation along with the safety assessments in each measurement for assessing dryness, erythema, burning sensation and irritation. Significantly better reduction in total, inflammatory, and non-inflammatory acne lesions were reported for TTO NE + ADA Gel as compared to the ADA Marketed Gel overall and on each measurement occasion (p value < 0.001 for all). Mean acne severity index also reduced with TTO NE + ADA Gel significantly in comparison with ADA Marketed Gel (p value < 0.001). Dryness was the most common adverse effect reported in both groups and it was higher in TTO NE + ADA Gel group. In conclusion, TTO NE + ADA Gel compared to ADA Marketed Gel appears more effective in the treatment of acne vulgaris, with no important change in adverse effects.

Acne and rosacea in skin of colour.

Acne and rosacea are common inflammatory skin conditions present in numerous racial and ethnic groups. There are distinct differences in clinical presentation, exacerbating factors, potential triggers and consequences of both conditions in individuals with skin of colour (SOC), classified as Fitzpatrick skin types III-VI. For example, acne can be complicated by the development of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation and keloid scarring in SOC, and this can influence treatment choice. Although rosacea is reported less frequently in SOC, this may be the result of delayed diagnosis or late presentation due to the difficulty in discerning the classic features of erythema in darker skin tones. In such cases, additional clues in the medical history and clinical examination may assist in making the diagnosis. This review aims to summarize nuances in both the diagnosis and management of these two common skin conditions in patients with SOC to support clinicians in providing an individualized treatment approach.