Increased CD14+HLA-DR-/low myeloid-derived suppressor cells can be regarded as a biomarker on disease severity and response to therapy in acute coronary syndrome.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the dynamic changes in monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (M-MDSCs) and their implications in the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), shedding light on potential therapeutic targets. Experimental Design: Peripheral blood samples were collected from 68 ACS patients, 35 stable angina pectoris (SAP) patients, and 30 healthy controls (HC). Multi-parameter flow cytometry was employed for analysis of M-MDSCs, explored with disease characteristics and progression. Results: ACS patients exhibited an increased frequency of circulating M-MDSCs compared to SAP patients and HC. M-MDSCs levels demonstrated associations with ACS type, coronary artery lesions, multi-vessel disease, and cardiac dysfunction severity. Higher M-MDSCs levels were found in obese patients. Notably, therapy led to a significant decrease in M-MDSCs frequency. Furthermore, ACS patients exhibited elevated levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in the cytokine profile associated with M-MDSCs. Increased expression of arginase-1(Arg-1) was observed in ACS patients, with positive correlations between M-MDSCs levels and IL-6, GM-CSF, and Arg-1 expression. The diagnostic performance of triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and M-MDSCs levels varied in predicting the severity of coronary artery stenosis, with TG showing higher specificity, HDL-C displaying higher sensitivity, and M-MDSCs levels demonstrating balanced sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions: Assessment of M-MDSCs frequency holds promise as a predictive marker for disease progression and therapy response of coronary artery stenosis. The elevated presence of M-MDSCs suggests their potential role in modulating ACS-related inflammation.

Comparative Effectiveness of Interventional Therapy versus Exercise Rehabilitation in Stable Angina Patients with Severe Coronary Artery Stenosis.

Background: Management strategies for stable angina include pharmacotherapy, revascularization, and exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR). The optimal treatment for stable angina patients with severe coronary artery stenosis remains unclear. This study aimed to compare interventional therapy with exercise rehabilitation in this population. Methods: Fifty stable angina patients with severe coronary stenosis who underwent stent implantation were included in the optimal medical therapy (OMT) plus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) group, and 50 patients who did not undergo interventional treatment were included in OMT plus CR group receiving exercise rehabilitation guidance for one year. Cardiovascular composite endpoint events, cardiopulmonary fitness, and quality of life scale scores were assessed after one year. Results: No significant difference in incidence of cardiovascular composite endpoint events was observed between OMT plus PCI group with OMT plus CR group (20.0% vs 14.6%) after one year. Cardiopulmonary fitness represented as peak VO2 (19.2±3.5 vs 17.6±3.2 mL/kg/min), peak load (120±19 vs 108±20 W), and AT (13.5±1.5 vs 12.1±1.3 mL/kg/min) were significantly higher in the rehabilitation group than the intervention group after one year. Both groups showed improvement in their quality of life, but the rehabilitation group improved in more scales. Conclusion: Interventional therapy did not reduce cardiovascular events compared to exercise-based rehabilitation in stable angina patients with severe coronary artery stenosis, but the rehabilitation can improve cardiovascular fitness and quality of life more.

Optimizing Management of Stable Angina: A Patient-Centered Approach Integrating Revascularization, Medical Therapy, and Lifestyle Interventions.

Angina pectoris may arise from obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) or in the absence of significant CAD (ischemia with nonobstructed coronary arteries [INOCA]). Therapeutic strategies for patients with angina and obstructive CAD focus on reducing cardiovascular events and relieving symptoms, whereas in INOCA the focus shifts toward managing functional alterations of the coronary circulation. In obstructive CAD, coronary revascularization might improve angina status, although a significant percentage of patients present angina persistence or recurrence, suggesting the presence of functional mechanisms along with epicardial CAD. In patients with INOCA, performing a precise endotype diagnosis is crucial to allow a tailored therapy targeted toward the specific pathogenic mechanism. In this expert opinion paper, we review the evidence for the management of angina, highlighting the complementary role of coronary revascularization, optimal medical therapy, and lifestyle interventions and underscoring the importance of a personalized approach that targets the underlying pathobiology.

Completeness of revascularization by FFRCT in stable angina: Association to adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of complete coronary revascularization relative to non-invasive testing methods is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between completeness of revascularization defined by CTA-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stable angina. METHODS: Multicenter 3-year follow-up study of patients with new onset stable angina and ≥ 30% stenosis by CTA. The lesion-specific FFRCT value (two cm-distal-to-stenosis) was registered in all vessels with stenosis and considered abnormal when ≤ 0.80. Patients with FFRCT ≤ 0.80 were categorized as: Completely revascularized (CR-FFRCT), all vessels with FFRCT ≤ 0.80 revascularized; incompletely revascularized (IR-FFRCT), ≥ 1 vessels with FFRCT ≤ 0.80 non-revascularized. Early revascularization (< 90 days from index CTA) categorized vessels as revascularized. The primary endpoint comprised cardiovascular death and non-fatal myocardial infarction; the secondary endpoint vessel-specific late revascularization and non-fatal myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Amongst 900 patients and 1759 vessels, FFRCT was ≤ 0.80 in 377 (42%) patients, 536 (30%) vessels; revascularization was performed in 244 (27%) patients, 340 (19%) vessels. Risk of the primary endpoint was higher for IR-FFRCT (15/210 [7.1%]) compared to CR-FFRCT (4/167 [2.4%]), RR: 2.98; 95% CI: 1.01-8.8, p â€‹= â€‹0.036, and to normal FFRCT (3/523 [0.6%]), RR: 12.45; 95% CI: 3.6-42.6, p â€‹< â€‹0.001. Incidence of the secondary endpoint was higher in non-revascularized vessels with FFRCT ≤ 0.80 (29/250 [12%]) compared to revascularized vessels with FFRCT ≤ 0.80 (5/286 [1.7%]), p â€‹= â€‹0.001, and to vessels with FFRCT > 0.80 (10/1223 [0.8%]), p â€‹< â€‹0.001. CONCLUSION: Incomplete revascularization of patients with lesion-specific FFRCT ≤ 0.80 is associated to unfavorable cardiovascular outcomes compared to those with complete revascularization or FFRCT > 0.80.

Impact of hyperaemic stenosis resistance on long-term outcomes of stable angina in the ILIAS Registry.

BACKGROUND: The hyperaemic stenosis resistance (HSR) index was introduced to provide a more comprehensive indicator of the haemodynamic severity of a coronary lesion. HSR combines both the pressure drop across a lesion and the flow through it. As such, HSR overcomes the limitations of the more traditional fractional flow reserve (FFR) or coronary flow reserve (CFR) indices. AIMS: We aimed to identify the diagnostic and prognostic value of HSR and evaluate the clinical implications. METHODS: Patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) and obstructive coronary artery disease were selected from the multicentre ILIAS Registry. For this study, only patients with combined Doppler flow and pressure measurements were included. RESULTS: A total of 853 patients with 1,107 vessels were included. HSR more accurately identified the presence of inducible ischaemia compared to FFR and CFR (area under the curve 0.71 vs 0.66 and 0.62, respectively; p<0.005 for both). An abnormal HSR measurement was an independent and important predictor of target vessel failure at 5-year follow-up (hazard ratio 3.80, 95% confidence interval: 2.12-6.73; p<0.005). In vessels deferred from revascularisation, HSR seems to identify more accurately those vessels that may benefit from revascularisation rather than FFR and/or CFR. CONCLUSIONS: The present study affirms the theoretical advantages of the HSR index for the detection of ischaemia-Âinducing coronary lesions in a large CCS population. (Inclusive Invasive Physiological Assessment in Angina Syndromes Registry [ILIAS Registry], ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04485234).

Symptoms as a Predictor of the Placebo-Controlled Efficacy of PCI in Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: Placebo-controlled evidence from ORBITA-2 (Objective Randomised Blinded Investigation with Optimal Medical Therapy of Angioplasty in Stable Angina-2) found that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in stable coronary artery disease with little or no antianginal medication relieved angina, but residual symptoms persisted in many patients. The reason for this was unclear. OBJECTIVES: This ORBITA-2 secondary analysis investigates the relationship between presenting symptoms and disease severity (anatomic, noninvasive, and invasive ischemia) and the ability of symptoms to predict the placebo-controlled efficacy of PCI. METHODS: Prerandomization symptom severity and nature were assessed using the ORBITA smartphone application and symptom and quality of life questionnaires including the World Health Organization Rose angina questionnaire (Rose). Disease severity was assessed using quantitative coronary angiography, stress echocardiography, fractional flow reserve, and instantaneous wave-free ratio. Bayesian ordinal regression was used. RESULTS: At prerandomization, the median number of daily angina episodes was 0.8 (Q1-Q3: 0.4-1.6), 64% had Rose angina, quantitative coronary angiography diameter stenosis was 61% (Q1-Q3: 49%-74%), stress echocardiography score was 1.0 (Q1-Q3: 0.0-2.7), fractional flow reserve was 0.63 (Q1-Q3: 0.49-0.75), and instantaneous wave-free ratio was 0.78 (Q1-Q3: 0.55-0.87). There was little relationship between symptom severity and nature and disease severity: angina symptom score with quantitative coronary angiography ordinal correlation coefficient: 0.06 (95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.00-0.08); stress echocardiography: 0.09 (95% CrI: 0.02-0.10); fractional flow reserve: 0.04 (95% CrI: -0.03 to 0.07); and instantaneous wave-free ratio: 0.04 (95% CrI: -0.01 to 0.07). However, Rose angina and guideline-based typical angina were strong predictors of placebo-controlled PCI efficacy (angina symptom score: OR: 1.9; 95% CrI: 1.6-2.1; probability of interaction [PrInteraction] = 99.9%; and OR: 1.8; 95% CrI: 1.6-2.1; PrInteraction = 99.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although symptom severity and nature were poorly associated with disease severity, the nature of symptoms powerfully predicted the placebo-controlled efficacy of PCI.

Atrial fibrillation incidence after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention: the prospective AFAF cohort study.

Objectives. Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia in patients with ischemic heart disease. This study aimed to determine the cumulative incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation after percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting surgery during 30 days of follow-up. Design. This was a prospective multi-center cohort study on atrial fibrillation incidence following percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for stable angina or non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Heart rhythm was monitored for 30 days postoperatively by in-hospital telemetry and handheld thumb ECG recordings after discharge were performed. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of atrial fibrillation 30 days after the index procedure. Results. In-hospital atrial fibrillation occurred in 60/123 (49%) coronary artery bypass graft and 0/123 percutaneous coronary intervention patients (p < .001). The cumulative incidence of atrial fibrillation after 30 days was 56% (69/123) of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and 2% (3/123) of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (p < .001). CABG was a strong predictor for atrial fibrillation compared to PCI (OR 80.2, 95% CI 18.1-354.9, p < .001). Thromboembolic stroke occurred in-hospital in one coronary artery bypass graft patient unrelated to atrial fibrillation, and at 30 days in two additional patients, one in each group. There was no mortality. Conclusion. New-onset atrial fibrillation during 30 days of follow-up was rare after percutaneous coronary intervention but common after coronary artery bypass grafting. A prolonged uninterrupted heart rhythm monitoring strategy identified additional patients in both groups with new-onset atrial fibrillation after discharge.

Frequency of ventriculography during left heart catheterization for radial vs. femoral access.

BACKGROUND: Radial artery access has been used for left heart catheterization (LHC) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for over 30 years. This method has gained popularity among operators due to superficial vessel anatomy, allowing for easy accessibility and compressibility, resulting in effective hemostasis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent PCI due to ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), and chest pain (stable angina) from November 2013 to February 2023. RESULTS: We analyzed validated registries and found 7714 PCIs. Of these, 1230 were STEMI patients, 5585 were NSTE-ACS patients, and 899 were stable angina patients, forming the basis of our final analysis. In STEMI patients, there was a trend toward a higher rate of ventriculography with femoral access compared to radial access (53.4 % vs. 47.5 %, p = 0.06), which was also observed in NSTE-ACS patients (34.2 % vs. 31.8 %, p = 0.07). The use of central venous access was more common with femoral access in all three diagnoses, with significantly higher rates seen in STEMI patients (36.2 % vs. 7.6 %, p < 0.001), NSTE-ACS patients (19.3 % vs. 2.8 %, p < 0.001), and chest pain patients (26.4 % vs. 2.7 %, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The analysis revealed that operators may perform fewer ventriculography and RHC procedures when using radial access as compared to femoral access. While there is discrepancy in performing left ventriculography and RHC when using a radial artery, it is essential to emphasize that routinely performing ventriculography and hemodynamic assessment has not proven to impact outcomes, despite their contributions to proper decision-making and treatment.

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus medical therapy in stable angina: a matched cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: It is uncertain whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in addition to optimal medical therapy (OMT) can reduce adverse clinical events in the long term as compared with OMT alone in patients with pure stable angina. METHODS: We enrolled patients from 2006 to 2010 using the Korean national insurance data. 58 742 patients with pure stable angina with no history of myocardial infarction (MI) nor PCI were candidate, and finally, 5673 patients in the PCI plus OMT group and 5673 in the OMT alone group were selected with 1:1 propensity matching. They were followed up for 9.3 years. RESULTS: Primary endpoint, a composite of MI, stroke and cardiac death rate was significantly higher in the PCI group than in the OMT group, 13.5/1000 vs 11.5/1000 person-year with HR of 1.18 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.32, p=0.003). Individual event rate of MI and cardiac death rate was higher in the PCI group than in the OMT group at 9.3 years, 2.9 vs 2.1 (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.7, p=0.009) and 4.8 vs 3.4/1000 person-year (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.69, p=0.001), respectively. Revascularisation and total death occurred more in the PCI group as compared with the OMT group, 30.3 vs 8.2 (HR 3.64, 95% CI 3.27 to 4.05, p<0.001) and 13.5 vs 10.6/1000 person-year (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.40, p<0.001), respectively. In subgroup analysis, the same trend of more event in the PCI group was detected. CONCLUSIONS: PCI plus OMT was associated with higher rate of primary endpoint of MI, stroke, cardiac death as compared with OMT alone in patients with pure stable angina at 9.3-year follow-up in large population.

Coronary computed tomography angiography derived fractional flow reserve and risk of recurrent angina: A 3-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: The association between coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) and risk of recurrent angina in patients with new onset stable angina pectoris (SAP) and stenosis by CTA is uncertain. METHODS: Multicenter 3-year follow-up study of patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of new onset SAP who underwent first-line CTA evaluation and subsequent standard-of-care treatment. All patients had at least one ≥30 â€‹% coronary stenosis. A per-patient lowest FFRCT-value ≤0.80 represented an abnormal test result. Patients with FFRCT ≤0.80 who underwent revascularization were categorized according to completeness of revascularization: 1) Completely revascularized (CR-FFRCT), all vessels with FFRCT ≤0.80 revascularized; or 2) incompletely revascularized (IR-FFRCT) ≥1 vessels with FFRCT ≤0.80 non-revascularized. Recurrent angina was evaluated using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. RESULTS: Amongst 769 patients (619 [80 â€‹%] stenosis ≥50 â€‹%, 510 [66 â€‹%] FFRCT ≤0.80), 174 (23 â€‹%) reported recurrent angina at follow-up. An FFRCT ≤0.80 vs â€‹> â€‹0.80 associated to increased risk of recurrent angina, relative risk (RR): 1.82; 95 â€‹% CI: 1.31-2.52, p â€‹< â€‹0.001. Risk of recurrent angina in CR-FFRCT (n â€‹= â€‹135) was similar to patients with FFRCT >0.80, 13 â€‹% vs 15 â€‹%, RR: 0.93; 95 â€‹% CI: 0.62-1.40, p â€‹= â€‹0.72, while IR-FFRCT (n â€‹= â€‹90) and non-revascularized patients with FFRCT ≤0.80 (n â€‹= â€‹285) had increased risk, 37 â€‹% vs 15 â€‹% RR: 2.50; 95 â€‹% CI: 1.68-3.73, p â€‹< â€‹0.001 and 30 â€‹% vs 15 â€‹%, RR: 2.03; 95 â€‹% CI: 1.44-2.87, p â€‹< â€‹0.001, respectively. Use of antianginal medication was similar across study groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with SAP and coronary stenosis by CTA undergoing standard-of-care guided treatment, FFRCT provides information regarding risk of recurrent angina.

Evaluation of stable angina by coronary computed tomographic angiography versus standard of care: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: There is limited data comparing Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) versus the usual Standard of care (SOC) in patients with suspected stable coronary artery disease (CAD). We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare CCTA versus SOC in patients with stable CAD. METHODS: We searched multiple databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CCTA with SOC, which included various functional testing approaches for evaluating stable CAD. We used a random-effects model to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Outcomes included all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), hospitalization for unstable angina (UA), invasive angiography, revascularization, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). RESULTS: We identified 6 RCTs with 19,881 patients with stable CAD, of which 9995 underwent CCTA, and 9886 underwent SOC. There were no significant differences between CCTA and SOC in terms of all-cause mortality (RR: 0.91; 95 % CI: 0.70-1.19; p = 0.50), MI (RR: 0.78; 95 % CI: 0.58-1.05; p = 0.11), hospitalizations for UA (RR: 1.20; 95 % CI: 0.95-1.51;p = 0.12), invasive angiography (RR: 0.71; 95 % CI: 0.32-1.61; p = 0.42), revascularization (RR:1.25; 95 % CI: 0.83-1.89; p = 0.29), PCI (RR: 1.20; 95 % CI: 0.78-1.85; p = 0.40), and CABG rates (RR: 0.89; 95 % CI: 0.530-1.49; p = 0.65). CONCLUSION: In patients with stable CAD, CCTA is associated with similar outcomes compared to the usual Standard of care. Given its potential to quickly rule out severe obstructive disease, its ability to provide non-invasive physiology and identify non-obstructive CAD with plaque information makes it an attractive addition to the available armamentarium to evaluate chest pain.

Serial fractional flow reserve, coronary flow reserve and index of microcirculatory resistance after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients treated for stable angina pectoris assessed with PET.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac 15 O-water PET is a noninvasive method to evaluate epicardial and microvascular dysfunction and further quantitate absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF). AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of revascularization on MBF and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) assessed with 15 O-water PET and invasive flow and pressure measurements. METHODS: In 21 patients with single-vessel disease referred for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), serial PET perfusion imaging and fractional flow reserve (FFR), coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) were performed during PCI and after 3 months. RESULTS: In the affected myocardium, stress MBF and MFR increased significantly from before revascularization to 3 months after revascularization: stress MBF 2.4 ±â€…0.8 vs. 3.2 ±â€…0.8; P  < 0.001 and MFR 2.5 ±â€…0.8 vs. 3.4 ±â€…1.1; P  = 0.004. FFR and CFR increased significantly from baseline to after revascularization and remained stable from after revascularization to 3-month follow-up: FFR 0.64 ±â€…0.20 vs. 0.91 ±â€…0.06 vs. 0.91 ±â€…0.07; P  < 0.001; CFR 2.4 ±â€…1.2 vs. 3.6 ±â€…1.9 vs. 3.6 ±â€…1.9; P  < 0.001, whereas IMR did not change significantly: 30.3 ±â€…22.9 vs. 30.1 ±â€…25.3 vs. 31.9 ±â€…25.2; P  = ns. After revascularization, an increase in stress MBF was associated with an increase in FFR ( r  = 0.732; P  < 0.001) and an increase in MFR ( r  = 0.499; P  = 0.021). IMR measured before PCI was inversely associated with improvement in stress MBF, ( r  = -0.616; P  = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Recovery of myocardial perfusion after PCI was associated with an increase in FFR 3 months after revascularization. Microcirculatory dysfunction was associated with less improvement in myocardial perfusion.

Stent reductor del seno coronario para pacientes con angina refractaria / Coronary sinus reducer stent for patients with refractory angina

INTRODUCCIÓN: La angina refractaria (AR) se define como un trastorno crónico de más de tres meses de evolución, caracterizado por una angina causada por una insuficiencia coronaria en presencia de una enfermedad coronaria que no puede controlarse con una combinación de tratamiento médico, angioplastia y cirugía de bypass coronario. Para establecer el diagnóstico definitivo, debe establecerse clínicamente que la presencia de una isquemia miocárdica reversible es la causa de los síntomas. La AR en España representa un problema de salud considerable ya que, según estima la European Society of Cardiology (ESC), el 3 % de la población española la sufre (1,4 millones de personas). El registro español AVANCE, tras estudiar a 2024 pacientes, determinó que prácticamente la mitad de estos (49,7%) tenía al menos un episodio de angina a la semana. Uno de los problemas en la determinación de la severidad es que la gravedad de la angina, el grado de discapacidad y la satisfacción con el tratamiento pueden no estar directamente correlacionados con la gravedad y el grado de afección arterial coronaria. Las estrategias de tratamiento destinadas a mejorar la calidad de vida son fundamentales en el tratamiento de estos pacientes y pueden asociarse también a un beneficio en la supervivencia. La intervención del seno coronario (SC) para el tratamiento de la cardiopatía isquémica es una innovación que se está desarrollando para los pacientes con angina crónica que no son candidatos a revascularización arterial coronaria. OBJETIVOS: Analizar la utilidad y las indicaciones, así como valorar la efectividad y los posibles beneficios y efectos adversos del stent reductor del SC para pacientes con AR. METODOLOGÍA: Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica que fue ejecutada en marzo de 2018. La estrategia incluía, entre otros, los siguientes términos en lenguaje libre y controlado: angina, coronary sinus y stent. Asimismo, se incluyó como término de búsqueda el nombre comercial del dispositivo a evaluar: neovasc. La estrategia de búsqueda se adaptó a cada una de las bases de datos seleccionadas, sin limitación temporal y para aquellos artículos publicados en inglés o castellano. RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN: Una vez depurada la búsqueda, los artículos que se incluyeron para su revisión fueron 14. Entre ellos siete artículos de revisión, un estudio observacional, un prospectivo multicéntrico no randomizado, dos retrospectivos, un ensayo y su protocolo, y una descripción de un caso concreto. Los resultados refieren el uso del stent reductor del SC como una tecnología alternativa para tratar pacientes con AR que no son candidatos o están en alto riesgo de revascularización, y definen el dispositivo como una aplicación segura y eficaz que muestra una mejora sintomática de los pacientes tratados. CONCLUSIONES: El reductor del SC es una nueva tecnología diseñada para reducir los síntomas incapacitantes y mejorar la calidad de vida de los pacientes que sufren de AR. En la actualidad, el conjunto de evidencia respalda el beneficio clínico del dispositivo en el alivio significativo de los síntomas de la angina en un 70-80% de pacientes con patología coronaria obstructiva que no son candidatos para la revascularización.

INTRODUCTION: Refractory angina (RA) can be defined as a chronic condition (lasting more than 3 months) characterized by angina caused by coronary insufficiency in patients with coronary artery disease that cannot be adequately controlled by the combination of medical therapy, angioplasty, and coronary artery bypass surgery. To establish a definitive diagnosis, it is necessary to clinically establish that reversible myocardial ischemia is the cause of the symptoms. In Spain, RA can be considered a major health problem, in that it affects an estimated 32% of the population (1.4 million people), according to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). The Spanish AVANCE registry found that almost half (49.72%) of the 2,024 patients studied experienced episodes of angina at least once a week. One of the challenges in determining the acuteness of angina is that the severity of the symptoms, the degree of associated disability, and satisfaction with treatment may not be directly correlated with the severity and degree of coronary artery involvement. Treatment strategies aimed at improving quality of life are crucial in managing these patients and may also be associated with improvements in survival. Coronary sinus (CS) intervention for the treatment of ischemic heart disease is an innovation being developed for patients with chronic angina who are not candidates for coronary artery revascularization. AIMS: To analyse the utility of coronary sinus reducer stents in patients with refractory angina (RA) and indications for their use, as well as assess their effectiveness, potential benefits and adverse effects. METHODOLOGY: A generic search was conducted in March 2018. The search strategy was based on controlled language and free-text terms including angina, coronary sinus, and reducer stent, as well as the brand name of the device under assessment, Neovasc. The search was adapted to each of the databases used and limited to articles published in English or Spanish but with no temporal restrictions. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: After refining the search, 14 articles were included in the review. These articles corresponded to seven review articles, one observational study, one non-randomized multicentre prospective study, two retrospective studies, one clinical trial and its protocol, and a description of a specific case. The results report on the use of the coronary sinus reducer stent as an alternative technology for treating patients with RA who are not candidates for revascularization or considered high-risk candidates and indicate that the device is an alternative option that is safe and effective, improving symptoms in patients treated. CONCLUSIONS: The coronary sinus reducer is a new technology designed to reduce disabling symptoms and improve the quality of life in patients with RA. Currently, a growing body of evidence supports the view that the device has clinical benefit in that it significantly alleviates angina symptoms in 70-80% of patients with obstructive coronary artery disease who are not candidates for revascularization.

Coronary arterial repair in patients with stable angina pectoris or acute coronary syndrome after ultrathin biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent implantation at 1-year follow-up by coronary angioscopy.

BACKGROUND: Imaging modality-based evidence is limited that compares the extent of coronary arterial repair after percutaneous coronary intervention between patients with stable angina pectoris (SAP) and those with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: Between December 2018 and November 2021, a single-center, nonrandomized, observational study was conducted in 92 patients with SAP (n = 42) or ACS (n = 50), who were implanted with Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stent (O-SES) providing a hybrid (active and passive) coating and underwent 1-year follow-up by coronary angioscopy (CAS) after implantation. CAS assessed neointimal coverage (NIC), maximum yellow plaque (YP), and mural thrombus (MT). RESULTS: Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between the SAP and ACS groups. The follow-up periods were comparable between the two groups (390.1 ± 69.9 vs. 390.6 ± 65.7 days, p = 0.99). The incidences of MT at 1 year after implantation were comparable between the two groups (11.4% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.92). The proportions of "Grade 1" in dominant NIC grades were highest in both groups, and the proportions of maximum YP grades and MT were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: O-SES-induced coronary arterial repair at the site of stent implantation, irrespective of the types of coronary artery disease.

Different effects of medications for hypertension on renal function between patients with and without diabetes mellitus undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective single-center cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension are well-known atherosclerosis risk factors. Furthermore, renal dysfunction is a crucial risk factor for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), and managing renal function in these patients is complicated because of comorbid conditions and potential side effects during treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of medications for hypertension on renal function after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between patients with and without DM with statins. METHODS: In 297 consecutive patients undergoing PCI for stable angina pectoris, cystatin C (CysC) was evaluated at baseline and 9 months after PCI, and the percent change in CysC (%CysC) was calculated. The association of worsening renal function (WRF: %CysC ≥ 0) and baseline characteristics, including medications, was assessed. RESULTS: Among 297 hypertensive patients with statins, 196 and 101 were with and without DM, respectively. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), angiotensin II receptor blocker, and ß-blocker were prescribed in 56 (29%), 82 (42%), and 91 (46%) patients in the DM group, and 20 (20%), 52 (51%), and 52 (51%) in the non-DM group, respectively. The patients with WRF after PCI were 100 (51%) and 59 (58%) in the DM and non-DM groups (p = 0.261). Additionally, the %CysC had no significant differences between groups [median: 0%, interquartile range (IQR): -7.9% to 8.5% vs. median: 1.1%, IQR: -6.6% to 9.6%, p = 0.521]. Multivariate logistic analysis for WRF using relevant factors from univariate analysis showed that only ß-blocker [odds ratio (OR): 2.76, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-7.90, p = 0.048] was independently associated with WRF in the DM group whereas ACEI (OR: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01-0.47, p = 0.012) was negatively correlated with WRF in the non-DM group. CONCLUSION: The ß-blocker was the independent risk factor for WRF in patients with DM in the late phase after PCI for stable angina pectoris, while the use of ACEI had a renoprotective effect in patients without DM.