Reducing maternal infection after assisted vaginal birth in a diverse and deprived population.

Postpartum maternal sepsis is a leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity. A single dose of prophylactic antibiotics following assisted vaginal births has been shown to significantly reduce postpartum maternal infection in a landmark multicentre randomised controlled trial, which led to its national recommendation. This project aimed to improve the local implementation of prophylactic antibiotics following assisted vaginal births to reduce postnatal maternal infections.Using a prospectively collated birth register, data were collected retrospectively on prophylactic antibiotics administration and postnatal maternal infection rates after assisted vaginal births at the Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals National Health Service Trust in North-West Birmingham of the UK. The data were collected from routinely used electronic health records over three audit cycles (n=287) between 2020 and 2023.A mixed-method approach was used to improve the use of prophylactic antibiotics: (1) evidence-based journal clubs targeting doctors in training, (2) presentations of results after all three audit cycles at our and (3) expedited a formal change of local guidelines to support prophylactic antibiotics use.Prophylactic antibiotic administration increased from 13.2% (December 2021) to 90.7% (July 2023), associated with a reduction in maternal infection rates (18.2% when prophylaxis was given vs 22.2% when no prophylaxis was given). However, we observed a gradual increase in the overall postnatal maternal infection rates during the project period.Our repeat audit identified prophylactic antibiotics were regularly omitted after deliveries in labour ward rooms (59.3%), compared with 100% of those achieved in theatre. After further interventions, prophylactic antibiotics administration rates were comparable between these clinical areas (>90%) in 2023.Together, we have demonstrated a simple set of interventions that induced sustainable changes in practice. Further evaluation of other modifiable risk factors and infection rates following all deliveries is warranted in view of the gradual increase in the overall postnatal maternal infection rates.

Adherence to Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Guidelines in Endourologic Procedures: Frequency and Related Outcomes.

Background: Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP), when used appropriately based on evidence-based guidelines, can reduce the rate of infectious complications following endourologic procedures without compromising patient outcomes. Objectives: To investigate the appropriateness of the current SAP used in endourologic surgeries based on international guidelines and report their associated outcomes (urinary tract infection [UTI] and blood stream infection [BSI]). Design: Prospective cross-sectional study. Methodology: The medical records of patients undergoing endourologic procedures were reviewed to assess healthcare providers' adherence to international guideline recommendations. Assessed parameters included indication, duration, choice, and dose of the antibiotics used in endourologic procedures in two medical centers in Amman/Jordan. Furthermore, patients were asked to conduct laboratory urine tests to determine the rate of infectious complications within one month post-procedure. Results: Three hundred and sixty-one patients were recruited for the study. The adherence rates to guidelines regarding indication, choice, and dose of pre-operative antibiotics were 90.3%, 2.8%, and 77.8%, respectively. The duration was concordant with guidelines in only 3.4% of participants. A total of 41.8% of patients completed follow-up. Among those, 4.6% developed bacterial UTIs, and 0.7% developed BSI. Conclusion: Adherence to SAP guidelines in endourologic procedures was far from optimal. Primary deviations in the implementation of guidelines' recommendations were pinpointed. These results are crucial for planning interventions that optimize SAP utilization.

The 2023 new European guidelines on infective endocarditis: main novelties and implications for clinical practice.

The 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis update the previous 2015 guidelines with main novelties in five areas: (1) antibiotic prevention for high-risk patients, and prevention measures for intermediate-risk and high-risk patients; (2) diagnosis with emphasis on multimodality imaging to assess cardiac lesions of infective endocarditis' (3) antibiotic therapy allowing an outpatient antibiotic treatment for stabilized, uncomplicated cases; (4) cardiac surgery with an emphasis on early intervention without delay for complicated cases; and (5) shared management decision by the endocarditis team. Most evidence came from observational studies and expert opinions. The guidelines strongly support a patient-centred approach with a shared decision process by a multidisciplinary team that should be implemented either in tertiary referral centres, becoming heart valve centres, and referral centres. A continuous sharing of data is warranted in the hospitals' network between heart valve centres, which are used for referrals for complicated cases of infective endocarditis, and referral centres, which should be able to manage uncomplicated cases of infective endocarditis.

Optimization of appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis in general surgery: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSI) are characterized by infections occurring in the surgical incision site, organ or cavity in the postoperative period. Adherence to surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is paramount in mitigating the occurrence of SSIs. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the appropriateness of SAP use in patients undergoing surgical procedures in the field of general surgery according to the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) guideline and to determine the difference between the pre-training period (pre-TP) and the post-training period (post-TP) organized according to this guideline. METHODS: It is a single-center prospective study conducted in general surgery wards between January 2022 and May 2023, with 404 patients pre-TP and 406 patients post-TP. RESULTS: Cefazolin emerged as the predominant agent for SAP, favored in 86.8% (703/810) of cases. Appropriate cefazolin dosage increased significantly from 41% (129 patients) in pre-TP to 92.6% (276 patients) in post-TP (p < 0.001), along with a rise in adherence to recommended timing of administration from 42.2% (133 patients) to 62.8% (187 patients) (p < 0.001). The proportion of patients receiving antibiotics during hospitalization in the ward postoperatively decreased post-TP (21-14.3%; p = 0.012), as did antibiotic prescription at discharge (16.8-10.3%; p = 0.008). The incidence of SSI showed a slight increase from 9.9% in pre-TP to 13.3% in post-TP (p = 0.131). CONCLUSIONS: Routine training sessions for surgeons emerged as crucial strategies to optimize patient care and enhance SAP compliance rates, particularly given the burden of clinical responsibilities faced by surgical teams.

Pneumocystis pneumonia in intensive care: clinical spectrum, prophylaxis patterns, antibiotic treatment delay impact, and role of corticosteroids. A French multicentre prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Severe Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) requiring intensive care has been the subject of few prospective studies. It is unclear whether delayed curative antibiotic therapy may impact survival in these severe forms of PJP. The impact of corticosteroid therapy combined with antibiotics is also unclear. METHODS: This multicentre, prospective observational study involving 49 adult intensive care units (ICUs) in France was designed to evaluate the severity, the clinical spectrum, and outcomes of patients with severe PJP, and to assess the association between delayed curative antibiotic treatment and adjunctive corticosteroid therapy with mortality. RESULTS: We included 158 patients with PJP from September 2020 to August 2022. Their main reason for admission was acute respiratory failure (n = 150, 94.9%). 12% of them received antibiotic prophylaxis for PJP before ICU admission. The ICU, hospital, and 6-month mortality were 31.6%, 35.4%, and 40.5%, respectively. Using time-to-event analysis with a propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting, the initiation of curative antibiotic treatment after 96 h of ICU admission was associated with faster occurrence of death [time ratio: 6.75; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.48-30.82; P = 0.014]. The use of corticosteroids for PJP was associated with faster occurrence of death (time ratio: 2.48; 95% CI 1.01-6.08; P = 0.048). CONCLUSION: This study showed that few patients with PJP admitted to intensive care received prophylactic antibiotic therapy, that delay in curative antibiotic treatment was common and that both delay in curative antibiotic treatment and adjunctive corticosteroids for PJP were associated with accelerated mortality.

Prophylactic antibiotic use for penetrating trauma in prolonged casualty care: A review of the literature and current guidelines.

ABSTRACT: Prolonged casualty care (PCC), previously known as prolonged field care, is a system to provide patient care for extended periods of time when evacuation or mission requirements surpass available capabilities. Current guidelines recommend a 7- to 10-day course of ertapenem or moxifloxacin, with vancomycin if methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is suspected, for all penetrating trauma in PCC. Data from civilian and military trauma have demonstrated benefit for antibiotic prophylaxis in multiple types of penetrating trauma, but the recommended regimens and durations differ from those used in PCC, with the PCC guidelines generally recommending broader coverage. We present a review of the available civilian and military literature on antibiotic prophylaxis in penetrating trauma to discuss whether a strategy of broader coverage is necessary in the PCC setting, with the goal of optimizing patient outcomes and antibiotic stewardship, while remaining cognizant of the challenges of moving medical material to and through combat zones. Empiric extended gram-negative coverage is unlikely to be necessary for thoracic, maxillofacial, extremity, and central nervous system trauma in most medical settings. However, providing the narrowest appropriate antimicrobial coverage is challenging in PCC because of limited resources, most notably, delay to surgical debridement. Antibiotic prophylaxis regimen must be determined on a case-by-case basis based on individual patient factors while still considering antibiotic stewardship. Narrower regimens, which focus on matching up the site of infection to the antibiotic chosen, may be appropriate based on available resources and expertise of treating providers. When resources permit in PCC, the narrower cefazolin-based regimens (with the addition of metronidazole for esophageal or abdominal involvement, or gross contamination of central nervous system trauma) likely provide adequate coverage. Levofloxacin is appropriate for ocular trauma. Ideally, cefazolin and metronidazole should be carried by medics in addition to first-line antibiotics (moxifloxacin and ertapenem, Literature Synthesis and Expert Opinion; Level V).

Evaluating antibiotic prophylaxis adherence: Implications for surgical site infections and wound care management.

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate adherence to an antibiotic prophylaxis protocol and its impact on incidence of surgical site infection (SSI). MATERIALS AND METHOD: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted at a teaching hospital in São Paulo, Brazil, from September to November 2015. The population were adults who underwent surgery with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. The main outcomes measured were incidence of SSI at 30-days postoperatively, protocol adherence and surgical wound complications. STROBE guidelines were followed. RESULTS: Among the 527 participants recruited, a 30-day follow-up was completed by 78.7 % (n = 415). Within this cohort, 57.6 % were females aged over 60 years (36.4 %). The incidence of SSI stood at 9.4 % (n = 39), with dehiscence being the most prevalent complication at 64.1 % (n = 25), followed by increased exudate at 51.3 % (n = 20). Notably, full adherence to the antibiotic prophylaxis protocol was low at 1.7 % (n = 7). The study observed a 60 % increased risk of SSI for every protocol mistake made. Alarmingly, 17.8 % (n = 74) of participants received antibiotic treatment exceeding the stipulated protocol duration. The overall mortality rate stood at 13.5 % (n = 56), with 1 % (n = 4) of these deaths attributed to SSI. CONCLUSION: There is a pressing global necessity to enhance antibiotic management, as underscored by this study's revelation of low adherence to the antibiotic prophylaxis protocol. This lack of adherence correlated with a notable incidence of SSI and subsequent wound complications. Nearly 20 % of participants received prolonged antibiotic treatment. Adhering strictly to the protocol could substantially impact SSI-related outcomes and enhance global antibiotic management.

Navigating the controversy regarding antibiotic prophylaxis in acute variceal bleeding.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with cirrhosis and acute variceal bleeding is part of the standard of care according to most clinical guidelines. However, with recent evidence arguing against antibiotic prophylaxis, the role of this intervention has become less clear.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in invasive urodynamics, a Delphi consensus of the Italian Society of Urodynamics (SIUD).

INTRODUCTION: Although antibiotic prophylaxis (AB) demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in bacteriuria after invasive urodynamics (UDS), no significant decrease in the incidence of urinary tract infections (UTI) has been confirmed. No absolute recommendations on the use of AB in case of relevant potential risk of UTI have been reported, though some categories of patients at increased infective probability after UDS have been recognized. The aim of this study is to report the experts' consensus on the best practice for the use of AB before UDS in the main categories of patients at potential risk of developing UTI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed on AB before UDS in males and females. A panel of experts from the Italian Society of Urodynamics, Continence, Neuro-Urology, and Pelvic Floor (SIUD) assessed the review data and decided by a modified Delphi method on 16 statements proposed and discussed by the panel. The cut-off percentage for the consensus was a ≥70% of positive responses to the survey. The study was a Delphi consensus with experts' opinions, not a clinical trial involving directly patients. RESULTS: The panel group was composed of 57 experts in functional urology and UDS, mainly urologists, likewise gynaecologists, physiatrists, infectivologists, pediatric urologists, and nurses. A positive consensus was achieved on 9/16 (56.25%) of the statements, especially on the need for performing AB before UD in patients with neurogenic bladder and immunosuppression. Urine analysis and urine culture before UDS are mandatory, and in the event of their positivity, UDS should be postponed. A consensus was reached on avoiding AB in menopausal status, diabetes, age, gender, bladder outlet obstruction, high postvoid residual, chronic catheterization, previous urological surgery, lack of urological abnormalities, pelvic organ prolapse, and negative urine analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended for patients without notable risk factors and with a negative urine test due to the potential morbidities that may result from antibiotic administration. However, AB can be used for risk categories such as neurogenic bladder and immunosuppression. The evaluation of urine analysis and urine culture and postponing UDS in cases of positive tests were considered good practices, as well as performing AB in the neurogenic bladder and immunosuppression.

A Quality Improvement Project to Increase Compliance With a Facility Protocol on Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) contribute to negative outcomes for patients and health care organizations. Compliance with clinical practice guidelines likely can help prevent SSIs. An interdisciplinary team at a regional referral center in Michigan sought to reduce SSIs by improving compliance with the facility's preoperative antibiotic selection, dosing, timing, and redosing protocol. The interventions for the quality improvement project included adding the preprocedural antibiotics and doses to the master OR schedule; holding an education session for all preoperative nurses, intraoperative nurses, and anesthesia professionals; and posting a reference guide in the preoperative and intraoperative areas. Compliance with the facility's protocol for antibiotic selection, dosing, and timing significantly improved. However, SSI rates and compliance with redosing recommendations did not change significantly. The team decided to add the antibiotic order information to the master OR schedule permanently. The team plans to consider providing education sessions on administering preprocedural antibiotics outside the OR.

Odontopediatría en el paciente con enfermedad sistémica / Pediatric dentistry in patients with systematic disease

Esta revisión ofrece un enfoque sistemático para establecer una prestación de atención dental segura, integral, coordinada y orientada a la familia del niño con complejidades médicas. Sugerimos que adoptar un enfoque individualizado basado en la fortaleza para la evaluación de niños con afecciones médicas complejas ofrece la base más segura para la prestación de atención en pacientes con enfermedad cardiaca y asma. El objetivo de esta revisión es brindar una visión razonada de atención en el paciente comprometido sistémicamente, basados en protocolos internacionales, y una serie de pasos y modificaciones que deben ser consideradas al momento del manejo odontológico. Se realizó la búsqueda científica en bases digitales contemplando información en idiomas inglés y español, acerca del manejo del paciente dependiendo de su diagnóstico médico y sus complicaciones. Concluimos que el tratamiento dental de pacientes pediátricos con enfermedades sistémicas se puede llevar a cabo de manera eficiente en presencia de un equipo dental bien equipado y apoyo de los padres. Un dentista pediátrico juega un papel importante en el alivio de la ansiedad del niño, manteniendo una relación positiva y haciendo que los servicios de atención se conviertan en experiencias cómodas y libres de complicaciones para pacientes infantiles con enfermedades sistémicas de base, como cardiopatías y/o asma (AU)

This review provides a systematic approach to establishing safe, comprehensive, coordinated, and family-oriented dental care delivery for the child with medical complexities. We suggest that adopting an individualized, strength-based approach to evaluating children with complex medical conditions provides the surest basis for delivering care to heart disease and asthma patients. This review aims to provide a reasoned care approach for the patient with a systemic compromise based on international protocols and a series of steps and modifications that should be considered during dental management. A scientific search was conducted in digital databases, including information in English and Spanish, on managing patients according to their medical diagnosis and complications. We conclude that dental treatment of pediatric patients with systemic diseases can be carried out efficiently in the presence of a well-equipped dental team and parental support. A pediatric dentist plays a vital role in relieving the child's anxiety, maintaining a positive relationship, and making care services become comfortable and complication-free experiences for pediatric patients with underlying systemic diseases, such as heart disease and/or asthma (AU)

Full adherence to cirrhosis quality indicators is associated with lower mortality in acute variceal bleeding: Nationwide audit.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Acute variceal bleeding (AVB) is a major complication in patients with cirrhosis. Using a nationwide AVB audit, we performed a nested cohort study to determine whether full adherence to the AVB quality indicator (QI) improves clinical outcomes in patients with cirrhosis and AVB. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We assessed real-world adherence to AVB QI among patients with cirrhosis admitted for AVB in all public hospitals in Singapore between January 2015 and December 2020. Full adherence was considered when all 5 QIs were fulfilled: prophylactic antibiotics, vasoactive agents, timely endoscopy, endoscopic hemostasis during index endoscopy, and nonselective beta-blockers after AVB. We compare 6-week mortality between the full adherence and suboptimal adherence groups using a propensity-matched cohort.A total of 989 patients with AVB were included. Full adherence to all AVB QI was suboptimal (56.5%). Analysis of the propensity-matched cohort with comparable baseline characteristics showed that full adherence was associated with a lower risk of early infection (20.0% vs. 26.9%), early rebleeding (5.2% vs. 10.2%), and mortality at 6 weeks (8.2% vs. 19.7%) and 1 year (21.3% vs. 35.4%) ( p <0.05 for all). While full adherence was associated with a lower 6-week mortality regardless of the MELD score, nonadherence was associated with a higher 6-week mortality despite a lower predicted risk of 6-week mortality. Despite high adherence to the recommended process measures, patients with CTP-C remain at a higher risk of rebleeding, 6-week and 1-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Full adherence to the AVB QI should be the target for quality improvement in patients with cirrhosis.

Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in Japanese hospitals: Real status and challenges.

BACKGROUND: Information regarding the status of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) in Japanese hospitals is lacking. This study aimed to explore the status of SAP prescriptions for surgeries and adherence to Japanese SAP guidelines. METHODS: From February to July 2020, a 1-day multicentre point prevalent survey was conducted at 27 hospitals in Aichi Prefecture, Japan. Patients prescribed SAP were included in this study. The appropriateness of the SAP was evaluated based on the guidelines for selection of antimicrobials and their duration. Surgery was defined as appropriate when all the items were appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 728 patients (7.1 %; 728/10,199) received antimicrobials for SAP. Among them, 557 patients (76.5 %, 557/728) underwent the surgeries described in the guidelines. The overall appropriateness of all surgeries was 33.9 % (189/557). The appropriate selection of antimicrobial before/during and after surgery and their durations were 67.5 % (376/557), 67.5 % (376/557), and 43.3 % (241/557), respectively. The overall appropriateness ranged from 0 % (0/37, oral and maxillofacial surgery) to 58.7 % (88/150, orthopaedic surgery) and 27.7 % (36/130, community hospitals with 400-599 beds) to 47.2 % (17/36, specific hospitals). Cefazolin was the most prevalent antimicrobial prescribed before/during (55.5 %, 299/539), and after (45.1 %, 249/552) surgery. In total, 101 oral antimicrobials were prescribed postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: SAP adherence by specific surgical fields and hospitals was shown in this study. Intensive intervention and repeated surveillance are necessary to improve SAP prescriptions in Japanese hospitals.

[Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis : frequent questions in the perioperative setting]. / Antibioprophylaxie chirurgicale: questions fréquentes en périopératoire.

Surgical Site Infections account for 15-30% of healthcare-associated infections. Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis is one of well-documented measures to decrease the risk of infections. However, many situations threaten its proper application and thereby its effectiveness: patient already receiving antibiotics or carrying resistant germs, clinicians' misunderstanding about timing and duration of antibiotic prophylaxis or patient history of penicillin allergy. In this article we try to clarify these situations to favour good practice in perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis.

Les infections du site opératoire représentent 15-30 % des infections associées aux soins et l'antibioprophylaxie chirurgicale est l'une des mesures bien documentées pour en diminuer le risque. Cependant, de nombreuses situations prétéritent l'application adéquate de cette mesure et donc son efficacité : présence d'une antibiothérapie en cours, portage de germes résistants, incompréhensions sur le timing et la durée de l'antibioprophylaxie, notion d'allergie à la pénicilline. Dans cet article, nous tentons de clarifier ces situations afin de favoriser la bonne application de l'antibioprophylaxie.

The Role of Targeted Versus Standard Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Pancreatoduodenectomy in Reducing Postoperative Infectious Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Infectious complications are common after pancreatoduodenectomy, which in turn are associated with preoperative biliary drainage. Current guidelines recommend a first-generation cephalosporin as perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. However, some studies support the use of targeted antibiotics. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the role of prophylactic targeted antibiotics compared to standard antibiotics in reducing postoperative infections after pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS: A search from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library from 1946 to July 2020 was conducted. Studies were included if they compared targeted antibiotics with standard perioperative antibiotics while including outcome data on surgical site infections (SSI). Targeted therapy was defined as perioperative antibiotics targeting organisms prevalent in bile instrumentation or by culture data obtained from the patient or institution. Outcomes assessed were the rate of SSIs and their microbiology profile. Analyses included demographic data, perioperative antibiotics, postoperative outcomes including microbiology data, and meta-analysis was performed where applicable. RESULTS: Seven studies were included, with a total of 849 patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy. Targeted antibiotics were associated with a significantly lower rate of postoperative SSI compared to standard antibiotic therapy [21.1% vs 41.9%; risk ratios (RR) 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.37-0.81]. Wound/incisional site infections and organ space infections were lower in patients receiving targeted antibiotic prophylaxis (RR 0.33, P = 0.0002 and RR 0.54, P = 0.0004, respectively). Enterococcus species were the most common bacteria reported. CONCLUSION: There was a significant reduction in overall SSI rates when targeted antibiotics was used. Current standard antibiotic prophylaxis is inadequate in covering microbes prevalent in postoperative infections developing after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Selective digestive decontamination, a seemingly effective regimen with individual benefit or a flawed concept with population harm?

Selective digestive decontamination (SDD) regimens, variously constituted with topical antibiotic prophylaxis (TAP) and protocolized parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis (PPAP), appear highly effective for preventing ICU-acquired infections but only within randomized concurrent control trials (RCCT's). Confusingly, SDD is also a concept which, if true, implies population benefit. The SDD concept can finally be reified  in humans using the broad accumulated evidence base, including studies of TAP and PPAP that used non-concurrent controls (NCC), as a natural experiment. However, this test implicates overall population harm with higher event rates associated with SDD use within the ICU context.

Optimization of Antibiotic Prophylaxis Delivery for Pediatric Surgical Procedures.

OBJECTIVES: To optimize prophylactic antibiotic timing and delivery across all surgeries performed at a single large pediatric tertiary care center. METHODS: A multidisciplinary surgical quality team conducted a quality improvement initiative from July 2015 to December 2019 by using the A3 problem-solving method to identify and evaluate interventions for appropriate antibiotic administration. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of surgical encounters for pediatric patients with appropriate timing of antibiotic administration before surgical incision. Surgical site infection rates was the secondary outcome. Intervention effectiveness was assessed by using statistical process control. RESULTS: A total of 32 192 eligible surgical cases for pediatric patients were completed during the study period. Identified barriers to timely perioperative antibiotic administration included failure to order antibiotics before the surgical date and lack of antibiotic availability in the operating room at the time of administration. Resulting sequential interventions included updating institutional guidelines to reflect procedure-specific antibiotic choices and clarifying timing of administration to optimize pharmacokinetics, creating a hard-stop antibiotic order within electronic health record case requests, optimizing pharmacy and nursing workflow, and implementing an automatic antibiotic prophylaxis timer in the operating room. Administration of prophylactic antibiotics during the recommended preincision time window significantly improved; the correct timing was recorded in 38.6% of preintervention cases versus 94.0% at the conclusion of rollout of the sequential interventions (P < .001). Surgical site infection rates remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: Here we demonstrate utility of the A3 problem-solving schematic to successfully optimize prophylactic antibiotic timing and delivery in the surgical setting for pediatric patients by implementing systems-based interventions.

Intraoperative bile duct cultures in patients undergoing pancreatic head resection: Prospective comparison of bile duct swab versus bile duct aspiration.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative surgical site infection is a major source of morbidity after pancreatic head resections, and data suggest bacterobilia as a leading cause. Some centers use intraoperative bile duct cultures to guide postoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis. This prospective study evaluates culture differences between traditional bile duct swab versus bile duct aspiration intraoperative samples. METHODS: Prospective patients undergoing pancreatic head resection with both bile duct swab and bile duct aspiration were included. Cultures were reviewed for organism characteristics. Any growth of organisms was considered a positive culture. Bile duct swab yield and characteristics were compared with bile duct aspiration. Postoperative surgical site infection complications were compared to bile duct culture results. RESULTS: Fifty patients were included. Bile duct aspiration resulted in a significantly higher median number of organisms compared to bile duct swab (6 vs 3; P < .001). There were no differences in the number of patients (37 vs 33) having positive bile duct aspiration and bile duct swab cultures (P = .385). Anaerobic cultures (not possible with bile duct swab) were positive in 21 patients with bile duct aspiration. A total of 37 (74%) patients had preoperative biliary stenting, which highly associated (P < .001) with positive cultures. Bile duct culture organisms correlated with postoperative surgical site infection in 12/17 (71%) patients. CONCLUSION: Use of bile duct aspiration improves intraoperative bile duct culture organism yield over bile duct swab and may improve tailoring of antibiotics in patients undergoing pancreatic head resection.

Surgical Site Infection After Dermatologic Procedures: Critical Reassessment of Risk Factors and Reappraisal of Rates and Causes.

While rates are low, surgical site infections are the most common complication of dermatologic surgery. Surgical site infections have important consequences including impairment of wound healing, suboptimal cosmetic outcome, hospitalization, increased healthcare costs, and rarely, systemic infection. It is imperative to understand the risk factors and existing preventative measures to minimize the development of infection. This article reviews the available literature regarding surgical site infections following dermatologic procedures, to evaluate the standard of diagnosis and role of wound culture, risk factors, mimicking conditions, and significance of antibiotic prophylaxis. We offer a critical reassessment of the current literature on risk factors and reappraisal of infection rates to promote evidence-based patient care. We conclude that the strongest evidence suggests that diabetes mellitus is likely associated with increased surgical site infections. Immunosuppression is often clinically considered a risk factor; however, the evidence is mixed. In general the addition of antibiotics does not confer benefit except in high-risk sites. Conclusively, Mohs micrographic surgery has been proven safe in office and inpatient settings. We agree that sterile glove use for simple procedures is likely not a significant factor in the development of surgical site infections; however, we hypothesize that the overall sterile technique and setting may play a role in longer and/or more complex procedures.