Characteristics and clinical treatment outcomes of chronic hepatitis B children with coexistence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibodies to HBsAg.

BACKGROUND: The coexistence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) represents an uncommon serological pattern observed in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, and its underlying mechanism and clinical significance have not been well established. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between this serological profile and clinical treatment outcomes in children with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 372 treatment-naïve CHB children from the Hunan Children's Hospital. The participants were categorized into HBsAb-positive group and HBsAb-negative group. The associations between HBsAb positive status to clinical outcomes were assessed using Cox proportional hazard regression. Receiver operating characteristic curve was conducted to evaluate the prediction ability in HBsAg loss. RESULTS: The coexistence of HBsAg and HBsAb accounted for 23.39% (87/372) of the participants. The crude incidence rates of HBsAg loss, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) clearance, and HBV-DNA undetectability were higher in the HBsAb-positive group compared with the HBsAb-negative group (37.46 vs. 17.37, 49.51 vs. 28.66, 92.11 vs. 66.54 per 100 person-years, respectively, all P < 0.05). The Cox regression analysis revealed a significant association between this serological profile and an increased likelihood of HBsAg loss (HR = 1.78, P = 0.001), and HBeAg clearance (HR = 1.78, P = 0.001). In addition, a combination of HBsAb ≥ 0.84 log10 IU/L and age ≤ 5 years can help identify patients likely to achieve HBsAg loss after antiviral therapy, with an AUC of 0.71. CONCLUSIONS: Children who are positive for both HBsAg and HBsAb demonstrate a higher probability of favorable outcomes after antiviral treatment. Thus, children with HBsAb-positive CHB should be actively treated to achieve functional cure.

Outcomes of Cessation of Nucleos(t)ide Analog Administration on Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Nationwide Retrospective Study.

Monitoring of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA and HBV-DNA-guided preemptive therapy using nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) are recommended to prevent the development of hepatitis due to HBV reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in recipients with resolved HBV infection. However, little is known about the appropriate duration of NA treatment and the effect of NA cessation on the recurrence of HBV reactivation. This study aimed to clarify the consequences of NA cessation in allo-HSCT recipients with resolved HBV infection who experienced HBV reactivation following transplantation. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of recipients with resolved HBV infection (hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]-negative, anti-HBc-positive) before allo-HSCT who had been diagnosed with HBV reactivation (HBsAg-positive and/or HBV-DNA detectable) after allo-HSCT between January 2010 and December 2020. A total of 72 patients from 16 institutions were registered (median age, 60 years; age range, 27 to 73 years; 42 males and 30 females). The day of initial HBV reactivation ranged from day 10 to day 3034 after allo-HSCT (median, 513 days). Anti-HBs were lost in >80% of the patients at the time of HBV reactivation. All 72 patients received preemptive NAs, and no fatal HBV reactivation-related hepatitis was observed. HBV-DNA without hepatitis was continuously detected in 5 patients during the follow-up period. Administration of NAs was discontinued in 24 of 72 patients (33%) by physician decision. Second HBV reactivation occurred in 11 of the 24 patients (46%) in whom administration of NAs was discontinued. The duration of NA treatment did not differ significantly between patients with or without second HBV reactivation. The frequency of further HBV reactivation tended to be lower in patients with an anti-HBs titer of >10 mIU/mL at the time of NA cessation. Multiple reactivations of HBV after NA cessation was common in patients with HBV reactivation who underwent allo-HSCT despite the long duration of NAs. Careful monitoring of HBV-DNA is important even after the discontinuation of NAs in the case with HBV reactivation after allo-HSCT, because multiple reactivations could occur. Active immunization by HB vaccine might be effective for suppressing further HBV reactivation after cessation of NAs.

Anti-HBc: a significant host predictor of spontaneous HBsAg seroclearance in chronic hepatitis B patients - a retrospective longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In chronic hepatitis B infection (CHB), seroclearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is associated with favourable clinical outcomes compared to those with persistent HBsAg seropositivity, and thus considered as a desired treatment endpoint. This current study explores the possibility of serum antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) as a potential predictive factor of HBsAg seroclearance. METHODS: This is a retrospective study that analyzed the plasma samples of CHB patients using the LUMIPULSE® G1200 analyzer. The longitudinal anti-HBc level between patients who subsequently achieved HBsAg seroclearance (S-losers) and those with persistent HBsAg-positivity (controls) were compared at multiple time points before the event. RESULTS: A total of 240 subjects (120 S-losers and 120 controls; age- and gender-matched) were included (mean age 56.42 ± 10.81, 65% male). Compared to controls, S-losers had significantly lower plasma anti-HBc levels prior to HBsAg seroclearance, with a significant trend of declining plasma anti-HBc 8-5 years prior to HBsAg seroclearance (p < 0.01), while such trend was not observed in controls. ROC curve analysis revealed that plasma anti-HBc at multiple time points before HBsAg seroclearance return AUC greater than 0.7. Plasma anti-HBc level at the cut-off value of 82.50 COI was 68.3% sensitive and 90% specific for HBsAg seroclearance within 1 year. Combining with quantitative HBsAg < 100 IU/mL, anti-HBc < 82.5 COI identified 88.2% patients who would develop HBsAg seroclearance within 1 year. CONCLUSION: Plasma anti-HBc level began to decline 10 years prior to HBsAg seroclearance and can serve as a potential predictor for subsequent HBsAg seroclearance.

Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Patients Receiving Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors are used to treat B-cell hematologic malignancies. Ibrutinib has been associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation. We sought to identify patients with hematologic malignancies who developed HBV reactivation after receiving first-generation (ibrutinib) or second-generation (acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib) BTK inhibitors. METHODS: We retrospectively studied all consecutive patients with hematologic malignancies with past HBV infection (HBV surface antigen [HBsAg] negative and hepatitis B core antibody [anti-HBc] positive) or chronic HBV infection (HBsAg positive and anti-HBc positive) treated with BTK inhibitors at our institution from November 1, 2015, through November 1, 2022. RESULTS: Of 82 patients initially identified, 53 were excluded (11 because of false-positive anti-HBc results, and 42 because they were receiving anti-HBV prophylaxis owing to recent receipt of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies). The 29 remaining patients were further analyzed and 3 (10%; 2/28 with past and 1/1 with chronic HBV infection) were found to have HBV reactivation. One patient received ibrutinib, and 2 received acalabrutinib. All developed HBV-associated hepatitis requiring anti-HBV therapy and survived. One patient continued receiving acalarutinib. Among the patients with past HBV infection, 13 received ibrutinib and 1 (8%) had HBV reactivation; 14 received acalabrutinib and 1 (7%) had HBV reactivation (P = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: HBV reactivation risk is intermediate in patients with past HBV infection who receive BTK inhibitors. For patients with past HBV infection who received BTK inhibitors, data are insufficient to recommend universal anti-HBV prophylaxis, but monitoring for HBV reactivation is warranted.

Risk Stratification for Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Resolved HBV Infection.

The prophylaxis strategy for hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with resolved HBV infection remains unclear. In this hospital-based retrospective cohort study, consecutive KTRs with resolved HBV infection were screened from the years 2000 through 2020. After excluding confounding conditions, 212 and 45 patients were respectively recruited into Anti-HBs positive and Anti-HBs negative groups. Cumulative incidences of, and subdistribution hazard ratios (SHRs) for HBV reactivation were analyzed after adjusting the competing risk. During a median 8.3 (mean 8.4 ± 4.9) years of follow-up, the 10-year cumulative incidence of HBV reactivation was significantly higher in Anti-HBs negative group when compared to that in Anti-HBs positive group (15.2%, 95% CI: 3.6-26.7 vs. 1.3%, 95% CI: 0.0-3.0; p < 0.001). In multivariable regression analysis, absence of anti-HBs (SHR 14.2, 95% CI: 3.09-65.2; p < 0.001) and use of high-dose steroids, i.e., steroid dose ≥20 mg/day of prednisolone equivalent over 4 weeks (SHR 8.96, 95% CI: 1.05-76.2; p = 0.045) were independent risk factors related to HBV reactivation. Accordingly, the 10-year cumulative incidence of HBV reactivation occurring in patients with two, one and zero risk factors was 42.7% (95% CI: 0.0-87.1), 7.9% (95% CI: 1.2-14.7) and 0%, respectively (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the strategy of HBV antiviral prophylaxis may be defined according to the risk stratification.

Risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation during immunosuppressive treatment.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to rate Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) reactivation, risk factors for reactivation and compare the efficacy of prophylactic antiviral therapy in patients who initiated immunosuppressive therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 177 patients with Chronic Hepatitis B or resolved HBV infection who had received immunosuppressive treatment were analyzed in this retrospective study. Demographic features, relevant liver tests, prophylactic treatment type, duration of treatment, transaminase levels and HBV serology and clinical conditions were recorded from all patients who received prophylactic treatment. RESULTS: Eleven reactivation occurred in all groups. The mean age of patients who developed reactivation was statistically significantly lower (p=0.049). Three (27.3%) of the patients were male and 8 (72.7%) were female (p=0.66). Eight (36.36%) of 22 HB surface antigen (HBsAg) positive patients developed reactivation, 3 (155%) of 155 HBsAg negative patients developed reactivation. HBsAg positivity was determined as a risk factor for reactivation (p<0.001). There was no significant difference neither in reactivation, nor in the type of antiviral treatment (p=0.2) according to anti-HBs serology (p=0.366). CONCLUSIONS: As a result, early age, baseline HBsAg positivity, moderate risk group, baseline HBV DNA positivity were associated with reactivation. Gender, immunosuppressive therapy type, preemptive antiviral therapy type, and anti-HBs titers were not associated with reactivation.

End-of-treatment anti-HBs levels and HBeAg status identify durability of HBsAg loss after PEG-IFN discontinuation.

Background: Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss, namely, the functional cure, can be achieved through the pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN)-based therapy. However, it is an unignorable fact that a small proportion of patients who achieved functional cure develop HBsAg reversion (HRV) and the related factors are not well described. Methods: A total of 112 patients who achieved PEG-IFN-induced HBsAg loss were recruited. HBV biomarkers and biochemical parameters were examined dynamically. HBV RNA levels were assessed in the cross-sectional analysis. The primary endpoint was HRV, defined as the reappearance of HBsAg after PEG-IFN discontinuation. Results: HRV occurred in 17 patients during the follow-up period. Univariable analysis indicated that hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) status, different levels of hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs), and hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) at the end of PEG-IFN treatment (EOT) were significantly associated with the incidence of HRV through using the log-rank test. Additionally, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the anti-HBs was superior to anti-HBc in predictive power for the incidence of HRV during the follow-up period. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis found that anti-HBs ≥1.3 log10IU/L (hazard ratio (HR), 0.148; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.044-0.502) and HBeAg negativity (HR, 0.183; 95% CI, 0.052-0.639) at EOT were independently associated with lower incidence of HRV. Cross-sectional analysis indicated that the HBV RNA levels were significantly correlated with the HBsAg levels in patients with HRV (r=0.86, p=0.003). Conclusions: EOT HBeAg negativity and anti-HBs ≥1.3 log10IU/L identify the low risk of HRV after PEG-IFN discontinuation.

Hepatitis B in Heart Transplant Donors and Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Expanding the heart donor pool to include patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) could help ameliorate the organ shortage in heart transplantation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the management and recipient outcomes of D+/R- and D-/R+ heart transplants. METHODS: An electronic search was performed to identify all relevant studies published on heart transplants involving HBV+ donors and/or HBV+ recipients. A comparison was performed between two groups where heart transplants were performed a) D+/R- (n = 98) versus b) D-/R+ (n = 65). RESULTS: Overall, 13 studies were selected, comprising 163 patients. Mean patient age was 55 y (95% CI: 39, 78) and 79% (69, 86) were male. Active post-transplant HBV infection requiring antiviral treatment occurred in 11% (1, 69) of D+/R- recipients and 33% (9, 71) of D-/R+ recipients. Post-transplant antiviral therapy was given to 80% (6, 100) of D+/R- recipients compared to 72% (42, 90) of D-/R+ recipients (P = 0.84). Hepatitis-related mortality was observed in no D+/R- recipients and 7% (2, 27) of D-/R+ recipients. Survival 1-y post-transplant was comparable between both groups at 83% (83, 92) and 81% (61, 92) for D+/R- and D-/R+ transplants, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our review found that HBV D+/R- heart transplantation was associated with fewer active hepatitis infections and lower hepatitis-related mortality than D-/R+ transplantation, with comparable survival at 1 y. Additional studies utilizing HBV nucleic acid testing (NAT) to compare outcomes with HBsAg+ and anti-HBc+ donors are crucial to reach more definitive conclusions about the risk of donor-derived infections in this context.

Polyarthritis presented in a patient with untreated chronic hepatitis B infection.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection can cause arthritis, but it is rarely reported. In the current report, we present a case of chronic polyarthritis in a patient with untreated HBV infection. A 63-year-old woman suffering from polyarthritis in her fingers visited our institution. She had experienced exacerbations and remissions of polyarthritis for more than 20 years. She had been diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis and had been treated with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs by her primary care doctor, but the csDMARDs were discontinued at the request of the patient 10 years before the first visit to our hospital. The blood test showed negative for rheumatoid factor and anticyclic citrullinated peptides antibody but positive for hepatitis B surface antigen. Hepatitis B surface antigen and HBV-Deoxyribo Nucleic Acid (DNA) were increased to 312.6 (IU/ml) and 4.6 (log copies/ml), respectively. Based on the results of abdominal computed tomography and echography, she was diagnosed with liver cirrhosis. Treatment for HBV infection was begun with oral tenofovir at 25 mg/day. The polyarthritis in her fingers gradually disappeared and has not relapsed for 6 months after the initiation of treatment for HBV infection. When polyarthritis is diagnosed, the possibility that chronic HBV infection can be one of the causes of polyarthritis should be considered.

Patients treated with rituximab are poorly screened for hepatitis B infection: Data from a low-incidence country.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with chronic or resolved hepatitis B are at risk of hepatitis B reactivation (HBVr) when treated with high-risk immunosuppressive therapy such as rituximab. Therefore, international guidelines recommend HBV screening prior to rituximab treatment and subsequent antiviral prophylaxis among patients with a (resolved) infection. In this study, we evaluated the adherence to those recommendations. METHODS: This is a retrospective multicentre study including patients treated with rituximab between 2000-2021. Performance of correct screening was assessed, defined as the measurement of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B core antibodies (anti-HBc). Next, initiation of antiviral prophylaxis and HBVr rate among patients with a chronic or resolved HBV infection was studied. RESULTS: We enrolled 3,176 patients of whom 1,448 (46%) were screened correctly. Screening rates differed significantly between academic and non-academic hospitals; respectively 65% vs 32% (p<0.001). In addition, screening rates differed across specialties and improved throughout the years; from 32% before 2012 to 75% after 2020 among academic prescribers, versus 1% to 60% among non-academic prescribers (both p<0.001). Antiviral prophylaxis was initiated in 58% vs 36% of the patients with a chronic or resolved HBV infection. Seven patients experienced HBVr, including one fatal liver decompensation. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients treated with rituximab were not correctly screened for HBV infection and antiviral prophylaxis was often not initiated. Although screening rates improved over time, rates remain suboptimal. With the increasing number of indications for rituximab and other immunosuppressive agents these findings could raise awareness among all medical specialties prescribing these agents.

Association between vaccine dose and risk of hepatitis B virus infection in Fujian Province, China.

The increased dose of hepatitis B vaccine has been adopted for newborns since 2013 in Fujian, China. However, little is known about the impact of this measure on hepatitis B virus (HBV) prevention. We used the seroepidemiological surveys conducted in 2014 and 2020 to address the concern. Compared with subjects who received a 5 µg hepatitis B vaccine, participants who took a 10 µg hepatitis B vaccine were associated with a lower risk of HBV infection (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10-0.68) and a marginal reduction risk of anti-HBc positive (OR, 0.37; 95% CI: 0.13-1.08; P = .07), but not for HBsAg carrier risk. The relation between vaccine dose and risk of anti-HBc positive (OR, 0.20; 95% CI: 0.05-0.81) became slightly stronger and significant among children investigated in 2020 who probably received universal vaccination. No significant association was found for subjects whose mothers were positive for HBsAg. The current 10 µg hepatitis B vaccines for universal vaccination for newborns are reasonable and effective in HBV prevention. More measures should be taken to reduce the risk of HBsAg carriers for infants whose mothers are positive for HBsAg.

Acute hepatitis B virus infection despite vaccination in a patient treated by infliximab: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Despite an effective vaccine, hepatitis B remains a major global health problem due to its significant morbidity and mortality. Vaccination in immunosuppressed patients such as those treated for an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can be less effective. This case describes an uncommon original diagnosis of an acute hepatitis B infection occurring in a vaccinated but immunocompromised IBD patient under long-term infliximab treatment. A low anti-HBs titer and the presence of HBsAg escape mutations are possible hypotheses to explain this unexpected infection. CASE PRESENTATION: A 28-year-old Caucasian male, regularly followed-up for a Crohn's disease treated by infliximab, was regularly screened for sexually transmissible infections because of at-risk behaviors. Despite a correct immunization scheme against hepatitis B virus (HBV), an active HBV infection was diagnosed during one of those screenings. Retrospective testing of a sample collected 6 months earlier was in favor of an evolution from an acute hepatitis B toward a chronic hepatitis B. The patient has always had a low anti-HBs antibody levels (near the threshold of 10 IU/L) possibly explaining his infection. In addition, HBV sequencing revealed a genotype A2 HBV strain, carrying the sD144A substitution on the S protein, known as a potential immune escape variant. Dual therapy combining tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine, active against HBV but also efficient as an HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis, was initiated. Ten months after treatment initiation, all surrogate biochemical and virological endpoints for HBV functional cure were achieved. Treatment and periodical monitoring are being maintained. CONCLUSION: Emphasis should be placed on HBV screening, vaccination and regular monitoring of patients under long-term immunosuppressive therapy, particularly those with at-risk behaviors.

Hepatitis B Virus Vaccination after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Prevents Post-Transplantation Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients with evidence of pretransplantation resolved HBV infection is an important cause of morbidity, usually occurring 1 year or later after HCT. We retrospectively studied a cohort of allogeneic HCT recipients with resolved HBV infection, some of whom were vaccinated for HBV following transplantation, to understand whether post-HCT HBV vaccination influenced the risk of HBV reactivation. The study included all patients with resolved HBV who underwent allogeneic HCT at our institution between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2015, where HBV vaccination starting at 1 year after HCT became standard in 2012 and antiviral prophylaxis is not used. Resolved HBV infection was defined as positive HBV-core IgG (HBcAb), negative HBV-surface antigen (HBsAg), and undetectable HBV DNA before HCT. HBV reactivation was defined as the development of detectable HBsAg and HBV DNA after HCT. Follow-up for outcomes concluded on January 1, 2018. Among 136 patients with resolved HBV infection before HCT, 19 developed reactivation during follow-up (cumulative incidence, 14%). The median time to HBV reactivation was 21 months (range, 2 to 47 months). When accounting for competing risks, the cumulative incidence of HBV reactivation among HCT recipients who survived for 1 year or longer after transplantation without early HBV reactivation and were HBV vaccinated versus those who were unvaccinated was 2.9% versus 10.0% at 2 years post-HCT and 6.6% versus 26.5% at 4 years post-HCT (P = 0.03, Gray's test). In a time-dependent Cox model, the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of HBV reactivation in patients with a pretransplantation HBsAb level >10 IU/L was 0.34 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13 -0.90). The aHR of HBV reactivation in patients who were vaccinated with 2 or more doses of recombinant HBV vaccine after HCT was 0.18 (95% CI, 0.04-0.80) compared with those who received 1 or no post-HCT vaccine doses. HBV reactivation is a late complication of allogeneic HCT in at-risk recipients, particularly in those with low pre-HCT HBsAb. HBV vaccination starting at 1 year after HCT may be protective.

Acute hepatitis B among HIV positive persons: A two-decade review of cases from a Spanish cohort.

PURPOSE: To review the incidence and characteristics of acute hepatitis B (AHB) in a large cohort of HIV infected persons from a low prevalence region during the last two decades. METHODS: Retrospective review of an HIV Cohort from a single reference centre in Madrid, Spain, between 2000 and 2018. AHB was diagnosed in persons with newly acquired HBAgS and acute hepatitis with positive IgM anti-HBc. RESULTS: Out of 5443 HIV+ patients in our cohort (3098 anti-HBc negative), 18 developed AHB from 2000 to 2018. The global incidence was 0.02 (0.01-0.04) per 100 patient-year in the entire population and 0.06 (0.01-0.1) per 100 patient-year in the anti-HBc negative population. A statistically significant decrease in AHB incidence was observed during these years (ß=-0.006; p=0.047). All 18 patients diagnosed with AHB were men, the majority (16) occurred in men who have sex with men. AHB was observed in 4 persons previously unresponsive to vaccination. Regarding antiretroviral treatment (ART), 15 were not receiving ART, two persons were on ART with any HBV active drugs and one person had lamivudine in the regimen. Two persons (11%) developed chronic hepatitis B. There were no cases of fulminant hepatitis. CONCLUSION: The incidence of AHB in HIV positive persons in our cohort was low and shows a progressive decline in the last 20 years. Cases occurred in persons not protected against VHB: not vaccinated or non-responders to vaccine that were not receiving tenofovir.

[Vaccination against hepatitis B in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: immune response and associated factors.] / Vacunación frente a hepatitis B en pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal: respuesta inmunitaria y factores asociados.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) are at increased risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection as well as a lower response to vaccination. This study aimed to analyze the immune response after vaccination against HBV in patients diagnosed with IBD and its associated factors. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients with IBD treated at the vaccination clinic for at-risk patients at the Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete during the period 2011-2018. Immune response after vaccination and associated factors were determined using logistic regression models. RESULTS: 231 patients were included. HBV Vaccination had an optimal immune response in 82.7% of the patients. The likelihood of response to vaccination increased in those diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (OR 2.90; 95% CI 1.11-7.61) and decreased with age (80% lower in those aged 40-55 years (OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.05-0.83) and 88% lower in those over 55 years of age (OR 0.12; 95% CI 0.03-0.53) compared to those under 40 years of age) and pharmacological immunosuppression (OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.58-0.71). CONCLUSIONS: The decrease in the immunogenicity of the vaccine against hepatitis B in patients with IBD after the beginning of immunosuppressive treatment, as well as with age, make early vaccination a priority in this kind of patients.

OBJETIVO: Los pacientes con Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal (EII) tienen más riesgo de infección por el virus de la hepatitis B (VHB) así como menor respuesta frente a la vacunación. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar la respuesta inmunitaria tras la vacunación frente al VHB en los pacientes diagnosticados de EII y sus factores asociados. METODOS: Se realizó un estudio observacional retrospectivo sobre los pacientes con EII atendidos en la consulta de vacunas de pacientes de riesgo en el Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete durante el período 2011-2018. Se determinó la respuesta serológica tras la vacunación y los factores asociados mediante modelos de regresión logística. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 231 pacientes. La vacunación frente al VHB tuvo una respuesta inmunitaria óptima en un 82,7% de los pacientes. La probabilidad de respuesta a la vacunación aumentó en aquellos diagnosticados de colitis ulcerosa (OR 2,90; IC95% 1,11-7,61) y se redujo con la edad (80% menor en los de 40-55 años (OR 0,20; IC95% 0,05-0,83) y 88% menor en mayores de 55 años (OR 0,12; IC95% 0,03-0,53) frente a los menores de 40 años) y con la inmunosupresión farmacológica (OR 0,20; IC95% 0,58-0,71). CONCLUSIONES: La disminución de la inmunogenicidad de la vacuna frente a la hepatitis B en los pacientes con EII tras el inicio del tratamiento inmunosupresor, así como con la edad, hacen prioritaria la vacunación temprana en este tipo de pacientes.

Significance of anti-HBc serological status in primary immune thrombocytopenia.

The association of previous hepatitis B virus (HBV) exposure [hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) negative, hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc/HBcAb) positive] with disease severity and decision on treatment option in primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) patients remains unclear. Data from 725 patients diagnosed with ITP were analyzed to elucidate the association between anti-HBc serological status and disease severity. Data from a published prospective study [high-dose dexamethasone (HD-DXM), HD-DXM plus recombinant human thrombopoietin, NCT01734044] and two retrospective studies (standard-dose and low-dose rituximab) were rearranged to evaluate the impact of anti-HBc serological status on the response and outcome to ITP-specific treatments and the risk of HBV reactivation related to these treatments. The prevalence of HBsAg- HBcAb+ and HBsAg- HBcAb- in ITP patients was 51·03% and 48·97% respectively. Compared to the HBsAg- HBcAb- group, patients in the HBsAg- HBcAb+ group had lower platelet count, higher bleeding score, and longer hospitalization (P = 0·002, 0·033, and 0·008 respectively). Moreover, the initial complete response rate of HBsAg- HBcAb+ patients was lower than that of HBsAg- HBcAb- patients (45·2% vs 59·8%, P = 0·027). In conclusion, previous HBV exposure was correlated with disease severity and hospitalization in ITP patients. Anti-HBc positivity may be considered as a predictor for poor response to ITP-specific treatments.

Hepatitis B sero-prevalence among hematology patients: importance of Anti-HbcAb and efficiency of antiviral prophylaxis.

Objectives: Hepatitis B infection is an important problem in immune suppressed patients. Anti HbcAb is an important marker that shows past exposure to virus. In this study, we retrospectively searched HBV serology among the patients who had Bone Marrow Transplantation (BMT) or chemotherapies (CT) at Medicalpark Izmir Hospital Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit; changes in viral parameters throughout therapy; and tried to find the efficiency of antiviral prophylaxis. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the viral parameters; HbsAg, Anti HbsAb, Anti Hbc IgG, HbeAg, Anti Hbe Ab, HBV DNA, HCV RNA which were carried out before BMT and CT. We grouped the patients as latent HBV infection and inactive carriers. Started antiviral treatment as prophylaxis, monitored the changes in serological parameters and defined HBV related situations. Results: A total of 584 patients were evaluated retrospectively. Twenty patients were having latent HBV infection. Ten patients were inactive carriers of HBV. In post-transplant period, the patients were screened for 11 months (1-38 months). None of the patients experienced HBV activation during follow period. Conclusion: The best approach in HbcAb positive patients with planned immunosuppressive treatment is the use of anti-viral agents before immune suppression and close monitoring of the patients HBV-related markers.

Prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection and risk of reactivation in rheumatic population undergoing biological therapy.

OBJECTIVES: Hepatitis B (HBV) is a common comorbidity among rheumatic patients. The prevalence of HBV infection and the rate of reactivation remain unclear. The literature data suggested a higher risk in chronic than in past infection. Currently, the literature data are mostly focused on anti-TNF and rituximab. This retrospective observational study aimed to analyse the prevalence of HBV infection and the risk of viral reactivation in a population of rheumatic patients undergoing anti-TNF and non-anti-TNF agents. METHODS: We analysed 1216 rheumatic patients, treated with both csDMARDs and bDMARDs between 2006 and 2017. Serologic markers for HBV (HBsAg, anti-HBs, anti-HBc) were performed prior and during biologic treatment. Patients with chronic or resolved infection were monitored every 3 months. RESULTS: The prevalence of HBV in our cohort was 15.7% (chronic infection: 0.4%, resolved infection: 12.6%, anti-HBc positivity alone: 2.6%). 12 (6.2%) out of 191 HBV infected patients experienced a reactivation. All of them showed markers of past infection. One patient experienced HBV reactivation despite lamivudine. Only one patient experienced acute hepatitis, probably due to the interruption of immunosuppressors in anticipation of surgery, not preceded by any HBV prophylactic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: HBV reactivation is a rare event in patients treated with a bDMARD and it can also occur while taking lamivudine, not only in chronic carriers (as per the literature data) but also in inactive ones. Regular screening followed by prompt treatment can prevent symptoms or complications. Due to the risk of hepatitis following the immune reconstitution, an antiviral therapy should be considered in the case of sudden discontinuation of csDMARDs or bDMARD.

Multidisciplinary Approach to Prevent de novo Hepatitis B in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

The reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is currently a social problem. Our hospital has established a project team, which consisted of medical staff including doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and technicians, to prevent HBV reactivation and subsequent de novo hepatitis B in 2015. To verify the usefulness of the team, we aimed to examine the implementation rate of HBV screening tests in patients with RA in 2011, 2015, and 2018. We also examined the rate of HBV infection, as well as the rate of HBV reactivation during the course. In this study, medical records of patients who visited our hospital in 2011, 2015, and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. HBV screening was completed when hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb), and hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) were all examined. The prevalence of patients who completed HBV screening dramatically increased from 2.4% in 2011 to 79.1% in 2015 and 86.9% in 2018. Patients who completed the screening had significantly higher rates of liver dysfunction, methotrexate use, and use of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs than those who did not. Of the 767 patients who completed HBV screening in 2018, 157 patients (20.5%) had previously resolved HBV infection (HBsAg-negative but HBsAb- and/or HBcAb-positive). During a mean follow-up of 41.0 months, reactivation of HBV was observed in 10 out of the 157 patients (6.4%); however, none developed de novo hepatitis B. In conclusion, our multidisciplinary approach to prevent de novo hepatitis B is considered useful.