RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The situation in France is unique, having a legal framework for continuous and deep sedation (CDS). However, its use in intensive care units (ICU), combined with the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies, still raises ethical issues, particularly its potential to hasten death. The legalization of assistance in dying, i.e., assisted suicide or euthanasia at the patient's request, is currently under discussion in France. The objectives of this national survey were first, to assess whether ICU professionals perceive CDS administered to ICU patients as a practice that hastens death, in addition to relieving unbearable suffering, and second, to assess ICU professionals' perceptions of assistance in dying. METHODS: A national survey with online questionnaires for ICU physicians and nursesaddressed through the French Society of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine. RESULTS: A total of 956 ICU professionals responded to the survey (38% physicians and 62% nurses). Of these, 22% of physicians and 12% of nurses (p < 0.001) felt that the purpose of CDS was to hasten death. For 20% of physicians, CDS combined with terminal extubation was considered an assistance in dying. For 52% of ICU professionals, the current framework did not sufficiently cover the range of situations that occur in the ICU. A favorable opinion on the potential legalization of assistance in dying was observed in 83% of nurses and 71% of physicians (p < 0.001), with no preference between assisted suicide and euthanasia. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the tension between CDS and assisted suicide/euthanasia in the specific context of intensive care and suggest that ICU professionals would be supportive of a legislative evolution.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Cuidados Críticos , Sedação Profunda , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Suicídio Assistido , Humanos , França , Suicídio Assistido/legislação & jurisprudência , Suicídio Assistido/ética , Masculino , Feminino , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Médicos , Assistência Terminal/legislação & jurisprudência , Assistência Terminal/ética , Eutanásia/legislação & jurisprudência , Extubação , Enfermeiras e EnfermeirosRESUMO
STATE OF PALLIATIVE CARE IN France. France is facing an epidemiological context marked by an increase in the number of elderly and very elderly people (often polypathological and dependent), and in the number of people suffering from serious or degenerative chronic illnesses. Considering people's needs and providing them with support in their last period of life has become more time-consuming, requiring appropriate care. The end-of-life trajectories of French people are heterogeneous, with a diversity of palliative and end-of-life trajectories coexisting, depending on their pathologies, personal situations, and frailties. This observation, combined with a legislative framework that has been evolving since the 90s to strengthen the rights of patients and their families, has prompted public authorities to reform end-of-life care provision, so that it is effective wherever the end of life takes place, and in line with societal expectations. A palliative care network is currently being set up at regional level and will be gradually extended to each region. Based on currently available data, the Centre National des Soins Palliatifs et de la Fin de Vie (National Center for Palliative and End-of-Life Care) has published an atlas to provide a better understanding of the evolution of end-of-life care provision and activity in France, the key figures of which are summarized in this article. This situation remains incomplete due to the lack of identification of trained professionals and the care procedures performed, especially at home. The government's current ambition to strengthen dedicated territorial organizations based on personalized care and support plans is a response to the present and future challenges of organizing palliative and end-oflife care in France.
ÉTAT DES LIEUX DES SOINS PALLIATIFS EN France. La France fait face à un contexte épidémiologique marqué par une augmentation du nombre de personnes âgées, voire très âgées (souvent polypathologiques et dépendantes), et de celui de personnes atteintes d'une maladie chronique grave ou dégénérative. La prise en compte des besoins des personnes et leur accompagnement pendant leur dernière période de vie devenue plus longue nécessite une prise en charge adaptée. Les parcours de fin de vie des Français sont hétérogènes, faisant coexister une diversité de trajectoires palliatives et de fin de vie en fonction de leurs pathologies, leur situation personnelle et leurs fragilités. Ce constat ainsi qu'un cadre législatif évoluant depuis les années 1990 vers un renforcement des droits des personnes malades et de leurs proches engagent les pouvoirs publics en direction d'une réforme de l'offre en soins de la fin de vie afin qu'elle soit effective quel que soit le lieu et en adéquation avec les attentes sociétales. Une filière de soins palliatifs est en cours de structuration au niveau régional et est amenée à se décliner de manière graduée à l'échelle de chaque territoire. Sur la base des données actuellement disponibles, le Centre national des soins palliatifs et de la fin de vie publie un atlas pour mieux comprendre l'évolution de l'offre et de l'activité en matière d'accompagnement de la fin de vie en France, dont une synthèse des chiffres clés est proposée dans cet article. Cet état des lieux reste incomplet par manque d'identification des professionnels formés ainsi que des actes de soins réalisés, et ceci est d'autant plus vrai au domicile. L'ambition gouvernementale actuelle d'aller notamment vers un renforcement des organisations territoriales dédiées qui s'appuient sur des plans personnalisés de soins d'accompagnement constitue une réponse aux défis d'aujourd'hui et de demain pour l'organisation des soins palliatifs et de la fin de vie en France.
Assuntos
Cuidados Paliativos , Assistência Terminal , França , Cuidados Paliativos/organização & administração , Cuidados Paliativos/legislação & jurisprudência , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Humanos , Assistência Terminal/organização & administração , Assistência Terminal/legislação & jurisprudência , Assistência Terminal/normas , IdosoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate ED and intensive care unit healthcare professionals' perspectives and knowledge of the law that underpins end-of-life decision-making in Queensland, Australia. METHODS: An online survey with questions about perspectives, perceived, and actual, knowledge of the law was distributed by the professional organisations of medical practitioners, nurses and social workers who work in Queensland EDs and intensive care units. RESULTS: The survey responses of 126 healthcare professionals were included in the final analysis. Most respondents agreed that the law was relevant to end-of-life decision-making, but that clinician and family consensus mattered more than following the law. Generally, doctors' legal knowledge was higher than nurses'; however, there were significant gaps in the knowledge of all respondents about the operation of advance health directives in Queensland. CONCLUSIONS: The legal framework that supports end-of-life decision-making for adults who lack decision-making capacity has been in place for more than two decades. Despite frequently being involved in making or enacting these decisions, gaps in the legal knowledge of healthcare professionals who work in EDs and intensive care units in Queensland are evident. Further research to better understand how to improve knowledge and application of the law is warranted.
Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Pessoal de Saúde , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Assistência Terminal , Humanos , Queensland , Inquéritos e Questionários , Assistência Terminal/legislação & jurisprudência , Adulto , Masculino , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/legislação & jurisprudência , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em SaúdeRESUMO
La muerte siempre ha generado desconcierto, por lo que acompañar en este proceso de final de vida conlleva un alto compromiso existencial. Si a esta difícil tarea se le agregan los condicionantes hospitalarios o legales que sufren los enfermos en su agonía, estamos ante una muerte aterradora, muy distante de una partida que pueda ser considerada amorosa. Como sabemos, la palabra "clínica" hace referencia a la práctica de atender al pie de la cama del paciente, aliviando el dolor del que está por partir; sin embargo, el "corsé legal" de la muerte está alejando al médico de aquel que debiera recibir toda su atención y sus cuidados, atándole el brazo para acompañarlo en el buen morir. Deberíamos debatir y acordar una estrategia que enriquezca la experiencia del momento final de la vida, de modo que ese conjunto acotado de pacientes pueda elegir su forma de partir. Es de un valor incalculable despertar la compasión en este tema tan importante que preocupa al ser humano desde los inicios de la civilización. Sería muy fructífero que aprovechemos la transmisión de sabiduría de siglos de antiguas culturas que han sabido cuidar con humildad la vida hasta el instante de morir. (AU)
Death has always implied confusion, so accompanying this end-of-life process entails a highexistential commitment. If we add to this difficult task the hospital or legal constraints suffered bypatients in their agony, we are facing a terrifying death, very far from a departure that can be considered a loving one. As we know, the word "clinical" refers to the practice of caring for the patient very close to the bed, alleviating the pain of whom is about to leave; however, the "legal corset" of death is separating the doctor from the one who should receive all his attention and care, preventing him from accompanying the pacient in his/her good dying. We should discuss and agree on a strategy that enriches the experience of the end of life, so that patients could choose the way to leave. It is of incalculable value to awaken compassion on this important issue that has concerned human since the beggining of civilization. It would be very fruitful if we take advantage of the enormous wisdom of ancient cultures that have humbly cared for life until the moment of death. (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos/legislação & jurisprudência , Assistência Terminal/legislação & jurisprudência , Direito a Morrer/legislação & jurisprudência , Atitude Frente a Morte , Doente Terminal/legislação & jurisprudência , Morte , Cuidados Paliativos/psicologia , Argentina , Assistência Terminal/psicologia , Doente Terminal/psicologia , Preferência do Paciente/psicologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: This study aimed to confirm the decision-making patterns for life-sustaining treatment (LST) and analyze medical service utilization changes after enforcement of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision-Making Act. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 1,237 patients who completed legal forms for life-sustaining treatment (hereafter called the LST form) at three academic hospitals and died at the same institutions, 1,018 cancer patients were included. Medical service utilization and costs were analyzed using claims data. RESULTS: The median time to death from completion of the LST form was three days (range, 0 to 248 days). Of these, 517 people died within two days of completing the document, and 36.1% of all patients prepared the LST form themselves. The frequency of use of the intensive care unit, continuous renal replacement therapy, and mechanical ventilation was significantly higher when the families filled out the form without knowing the patient's intention. In the top 10% of the medical expense groups, the decision-makers for LST were family members rather than patients (28% patients vs. 32% family members who knew and 40% family members who did not know the patient's intention). CONCLUSION: The cancer patient's own decision-making rather than the family's decision was associated with earlier decision-making, less use of some critical treatments (except chemotherapy) and expensive evaluations, and a trend toward lower medical costs.
Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Neoplasias/terapia , Assistência Terminal/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Família , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/mortalidade , República da Coreia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Assistência Terminal/legislação & jurisprudência , Fatores de TempoAssuntos
Protestantismo , Religião e Medicina , Suicídio Assistido/ética , Suicídio Assistido/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos/ética , Cuidados Paliativos/legislação & jurisprudência , Assistência Terminal/ética , Assistência Terminal/legislação & jurisprudência , Reino UnidoRESUMO
Since its inception in 2010, the Concurrent Care for Children Provision of the Affordable Care Act has enabled seriously ill pediatric patients and their families to access comprehensive, supportive hospice services while simultaneously receiving ongoing treatment-directed therapies. Although this groundbreaking federal legislation has resulted in improvements in care for vulnerable pediatric patients, the implementation of the law has varied from state to state through Medicaid programming. The pediatric professional community is called to consider how Medicaid services can more effectively be delivered by leveraging legislative mandates and collaborative relationships between clinicians, Medicaid administrators, and policy makers. In this article, we examine ways concurrent care has been executed in 3 different states and how key stakeholders in care for children with serious illness advocated to ensure effective implementation of the legislation. The lessons learned in working with state Medicaid programs are applicable to any advocacy issue impacting children and families .
Assuntos
Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida/organização & administração , Medicaid/organização & administração , Cuidados Paliativos/organização & administração , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Criança , Atenção à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Georgia , Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Illinois , Louisiana , Medicaid/legislação & jurisprudência , Mississippi , Cuidados Paliativos/legislação & jurisprudência , Participação dos Interessados , Assistência Terminal/legislação & jurisprudência , Assistência Terminal/organização & administração , Estados UnidosRESUMO
End-of-life decision making involves clinicians, patients, and relatives; yet, the law in Israel hardly recognises the role of relatives. This raises the question of the law's impact in practice and, hence, whether it should be amended. This issue is examined on the basis of findings from a qualitative, interview-based study conducted in Israel among relatives of dying patients. The findings indicate that there are areas in which clinicians and relatives do not adhere to the law in the end-of-life decision-making process. For example, they do not always ascertain the patient's end-of-life preferences, which ignores a patient's right to autonomy and their right to make informed decisions. The apparent gaps between the actual conduct of clinicians and relatives on the one hand and the directives of the Israeli Dying Patient Act 2005 on the other, lead us to propose several changes to the Act.
Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões/ética , Família , Autonomia Relacional , Assistência Terminal/legislação & jurisprudência , Doente Terminal/legislação & jurisprudência , Feminino , Humanos , Israel , Masculino , Pesquisa QualitativaAssuntos
Esclerose Lateral Amiotrófica/epidemiologia , Esclerose Lateral Amiotrófica/terapia , Papel do Médico , Suicídio Assistido/legislação & jurisprudência , Esclerose Lateral Amiotrófica/diagnóstico , California/epidemiologia , Humanos , Assistência Terminal/legislação & jurisprudência , Assistência Terminal/métodosRESUMO
ABSTRACT: In the modern era, when prolonging life is not an option, the end-of-life discussions are unavoidably influenced by Neuroethics. Despite this, it is interestingly evident how the sentiments of a terminal patient of 1885 and a physician of 2020, are still comparable. This paper pre-sents the arguments behind the so-called "Therapeutic Misconception" and the aim of palliative care to provide dying patients support. It is essential to address priorities of informed consent, signed before any remedy is provided. A key component of the newest Neuroscience research is the analysis of motivation and free will. So, it is necessary to comprehend if the patient struggles to feel at peace with these aspects of his "right to die": Is he free to choose or is he influenced by the doctors? Is this confusion an example of "Therapeutic Misconception"? Is his Informed Consent totally "Informed"? In order to broaden our understanding, we account for many critical situations, such as the mentally impaired Psychiatric patients or the famous Italian case of Eluana Englaro. In addition, we suggested some current approaches such as Artificial Intelligence, useful in preserving some cognitive functions the patient may have lost. Furthermore, research in this field is very critical and in some Catholic countries like Italy, people faced difficulties accepting the idea of the "Anticipated directives". In general, whatever the mental status and whatever the terminal state, the patients seem still far from handling their own auto-determination and their Consent, even if the ultimate goal is to die with dignity.
Assuntos
Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/ética , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/legislação & jurisprudência , Direitos do Paciente/ética , Direitos do Paciente/legislação & jurisprudência , Direito a Morrer/ética , Direito a Morrer/legislação & jurisprudência , Assistência Terminal/ética , Assistência Terminal/legislação & jurisprudência , Adulto , História do Século XIX , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/história , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/psicologia , Itália , Masculino , Direitos do Paciente/história , Autonomia Pessoal , Médicos/ética , Médicos/psicologia , Direito a Morrer/história , Federação Russa , Assistência Terminal/história , Assistência Terminal/psicologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: In Korea, the "Act on Hospice and Palliative Care and Decisions on Life-sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End of Life" was enacted on February 4, 2018. This study was conducted to analyze the current state of life-sustaining treatment decisions based on National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) data after the law came into force. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of 173,028 cancer deaths were extracted from NHIS qualification data between November 2015 and January 2019. RESULTS: The number of cancer deaths complied with the law process was 14,438 of 54,635 cases (26.4%). The rate of patient self-determination was 49.0%. The patients complying with the law process have used a hospice center more frequently (28% vs. 14%). However, the rate of intensive care unit (ICU) admission was similar between the patients who complied with and without the law process (ICU admission, 23% vs. 21%). There was no difference in the proportion of patients who had undergone mechanical ventilation and hemodialysis in the comparative analysis before and after the enforcement of the law and the analysis according to the compliance with the law. The patients who complied with the law process received cardiopulmonary resuscitation at a lower rate. CONCLUSION: The law has positive effects on the rate of life-sustaining treatment decision by patient's determination. However, there was no sufficient effect on the withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining treatment, which could protect the patient from unnecessary or harmful interventions.
Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Cuidados para Prolongar a Vida/psicologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos/psicologia , Assistência Terminal/psicologia , Suspensão de Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Morte , Demografia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Cuidados para Prolongar a Vida/legislação & jurisprudência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Neoplasias/psicologia , Prognóstico , República da Coreia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Assistência Terminal/legislação & jurisprudência , Suspensão de Tratamento/ética , Suspensão de Tratamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: Six forms relating to decisions on life-sustaining treatment (LST) for patients at the end-of-life (EOL) in hospital are required by the "Act on Decision of LST for Patients at the EOL." We investigated the preparation and creation status of these documents from the database of the National Agency for Management of LST. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the contents and details of each document necessary for decisions on LST, and the creation status of forms. We defined patients completing form 1 as "self-determined" of LST, and those whose family members had completed form 11/12 as "family decision" of LST. According to the determination subject, we compared the four items of LST on form 13 (the paper of implementation of LST) and the documentation time interval between forms. RESULTS: The six forms require information about the patient, doctor, specialized doctor, family members, institution, decision for LST, and intention to use hospice services. Of 44,381 who had completed at least one document, 36,693 patients had form 13. Among them, 11,531, 10,976, and 12,551 people completed forms 1, 11, and 12, respectively. The documentation time interval from forms 1, 11, or 12 to form 13 was 8.6±13.6 days, 1.0±9.5 days, and 1.5±9.7 days, respectively. CONCLUSION: The self-determination rate of LST was 31% and the mean time interval from self-determination to implementation of LST was 8.6 days. The creation of these forms still takes place when the patients are close to death.
Assuntos
Doença/psicologia , Família/psicologia , Formulários como Assunto , Hospitais/tendências , Médicos/psicologia , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Terminal/psicologia , Suspensão de Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Tomada de Decisões , Doença/etiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , República da Coreia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Assistência Terminal/legislação & jurisprudência , Suspensão de Tratamento/ética , Suspensão de Tratamento/legislação & jurisprudênciaRESUMO
PURPOSE: The main purpose of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act recently enacted in Korea is to respect the patient's self-determination. We aimed to investigate the current status and features of patient self-determination after implementation of the law. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 2018 and January 2019, 54,635 cancer deaths were identified from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database. We analyzed the characteristics of decedents who complied with the law process by self-determination compared with decedents with family determination and with decedents who did not comply with the law process. RESULTS: In multivariable analysis, patients with self-determination were younger, were less likely to live in rural areas, were less likely to belong to the highest income quintile, were less likely to be treated in general hospitals, and were more likely to show a longer time from cancer diagnosis compared with patients with family determination. Compared with patients who did not comply with the law process, patients with self-determination were younger, lived in Seoul or capital area, were less likely to belong to the highest income quintile, were treated in general hospitals, were less likely to have genitourinary or hematologic malignancies, scored higher on the Charlson comorbidity index, and showed a longer time from cancer diagnosis. Patients with self-determination were more likely to use hospice and less likely to use intensive care units (ICUs) at the end-of-life (EOL). CONCLUSION: Decedents with self-determination were more likely to be younger, reside in the Seoul or capital area, show a longer time from cancer diagnosis, and were less likely to belong to the highest income quintile. They utilized hospice more frequently, and received less ICU care at the EOL.
Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Neoplasias/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos/psicologia , Autonomia Pessoal , Autocontrole/psicologia , Assistência Terminal/psicologia , Suspensão de Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Morte , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Neoplasias/psicologia , Prognóstico , República da Coreia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Assistência Terminal/legislação & jurisprudência , Suspensão de Tratamento/ética , Suspensão de Tratamento/legislação & jurisprudênciaRESUMO
PURPOSE: The "Act on Hospice and Palliative Care and Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End-of-Life" was enacted on February 3, 2016 and went into effect on February 4, 2018 in Korea. This study reviewed the first year of determination to life-sustaining treatment (LST) through data analysis of the National Agency for Management of Life-Sustaining Treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Agency for Management of LST provided data between February 4, 2018 and January 31, 2019 anonymously from 33,549 patients. According to the forms patients were defined as either elf-determinants or family-determinants. RESULTS: The median age of the patient was 73 and the majority was male (59.9%). Cancer patients were 59% and self-determinants were 32.1%. Cancer patients had a higher rate of self-determinants than non-cancer (47.3% vs. 10.1%). Plan for hospice service was high in cancer patients among self-determinants (81.0% vs. 37.5%, p < 0.001). In comparison to family-determinants, self-determinants were younger (median age, 67 years vs. 75 years; p < 0.001) and had more cancer diagnosis (87.1% vs. 45.9%, p < 0.001). Decision of withholding or withdrawing of LSTs in cancer patients was higher than non-cancer patients in four items. CONCLUSION: Cancer patients had a higher rate in self-determination and withholding or withdrawing of LSTs than non-cancer patients. Continued revision of the law and education of the public will be able to promote withdrawing or withholding the futile LSTs in patients at end-of-life. Further study following the revision of the law should be evaluated to change of end-of-life care.
Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Cuidados para Prolongar a Vida/psicologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos/psicologia , Assistência Terminal/psicologia , Suspensão de Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Morte , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Cuidados para Prolongar a Vida/legislação & jurisprudência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Neoplasias/psicologia , Prognóstico , República da Coreia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Assistência Terminal/legislação & jurisprudência , Suspensão de Tratamento/ética , Suspensão de Tratamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The management of oncology patients, especially hospitalized patients, can lead to almost daily discussions regarding therapeutic limitations. Here, we review the history and propose a summary of the texts framing the notion of "withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment" in oncology practice in France. This decision is regulated by the Claeys-Léonetti Law of February 2, 2016 recommending a collegial discussion and its documentation in the medical record. The decision to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatments is the subject of discussion between the patient, his physicians and his family and may take place at any time during his management. The work of intensive-care physicians provides many useful recommendations for acute oncology situations, however articles specific for oncology practice are scarce; this is a topic that oncologists must take up.