Novel Micro Crown Orbital Atherectomy for Severe Lesion Calcification: Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System Study (COAST).

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention of severely calcified lesions carries a high risk of adverse events despite the use of contemporary devices. The Classic Crown Orbital Atherectomy System (OAS) was safe and effective for severely calcified lesion preparation in the ORBIT II study (Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of OAS in Treating Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions) but was not optimized for tight lesions. COAST (Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System Study) evaluated the safety and efficacy of calcified lesion preparation before stent implantation with the Diamondback 360 Micro Crown Coronary OAS, designed for use in tighter lesions. METHODS: COAST was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study that enrolled 100 patients with severely calcified de novo coronary lesions at 17 sites in the United States and Japan. The primary effectiveness end point was procedural success, defined as stent delivery with residual stenosis <50% without in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and the primary safety end point was freedom from MACE (composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization) at 30 days. RESULTS: The OAS Micro Crown was inserted in all patients. A stent was delivered with a residual stenosis <50% in all except one patient (99.0%). Procedural success was achieved in 85 (85.0%) subjects versus 391 (88.9%) in ORBIT II (P=0.30), and freedom from MACE at 30 days was achieved in 85.0% versus 89.6% in ORBIT II (P=0.21). Freedom from MACE was 77.8% at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Prestent preparation of severely calcified lesions using the novel Micro Crown OAS resulted in similar rates of procedural success and freedom from MACE compared with the Classic Crown OAS. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02132611.

Short-term and long-term outcomes of bailout versus planned coronary rotational atherectomy.

The goal of this study was to compare in-hospital and long-term events between bailout rotational atherectomy (RA) and planned RA. In this retrospective study, All patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using RA at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from November 2011 to December 2018 were enrolled in this study. Planned RA was defined as RA performed immediately before balloon pre-dilation, while bailout RA was defined as RA after failure to expand the balloon or perform any other procedure. In-hospital and long-term major adverse cardiac events (MACE, defined as cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR) and stroke) were compared between the two groups. After statistical analysis, a total of 211 patients underwent PCI with RA during the study period: 153 in the planned RA group, and 58 in the bailout group. The incidence of coronary dissection was significantly higher in the bailout RA group than in the planned RA group (22.4% vs. 6.5%, P = 0.001). However, no significant difference in in-hospital MACE was found between the two groups (12.1% vs. 13.7%, P = 0.752). There was no difference in all-cause mortality (9.1% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.504) or long-term MACE (13.8% vs. 17.1%, P = 0.560) between the groups. Bailout RA was associated with a significantly longer procedural time (139.86 ± 56.24 min vs. 105.56 ± 36.71 min, P < 0.001) than planned RA. Therefore, compared with bailout RA, planned RA is associated with shorter procedural time and reduced incidence of coronary dissection, with no difference in MACE or mortality.

Orbital Atherectomy for the Treatment of Long (≥25-40 mm) Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions: ORBIT II Sub-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Orbital atherectomy (OA) is an effective method of lesion preparation of severely calcified vessels prior to stent deployment. Long calcified lesions may lead to higher risk of post-procedural complications, yet the optimal treatment strategy has not been established. In this study we sought to determine the safety and efficacy of OA in patients with long (≥25-40 mm) calcified target lesions. METHODS: ORBIT II was a single-arm trial that enrolled 443 patients at 49 U.S. sites. De novo, severely calcified coronary lesions were treated with OA prior to stenting. Patients treated with the OA device were stratified into two groups according to target lesion length as visually estimated by the investigator: those with short (<25 mm; N = 314) vs. long (≥25-40 mm; N = 118) lesions. Lesions >40 mm were excluded per protocol. The primary endpoint was the 3-year major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate, defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR). RESULTS: The 3-year MACE rates in patients with short (<25 mm) vs. long (≥25-40 mm) lesions were 21.1% vs. 29.9% respectively (p = 0.055). The rate of cardiac death (6.5% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.592) and TVR (8.5% vs. 13.7%, p = 0.153) did not significantly differ. The rate of MI (CK-MB > 3× ULN) at 3 years was significantly higher in patients with long (≥25-40 mm) lesions (9.0% vs. 17.0%, p = 0.024), with the majority occurring in-hospital (7.0% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with long (≥25-40 mm) calcified target lesions had similar outcomes in terms of MACE at 3 years despite higher rates of MI, which mostly occurred in-hospital. Using the more contemporary SCAI definition of MI, there was no significant difference in rates of MI between the short (<25 mm) and long (≥25-40 mm) groups. Further studies are warranted to determine how OA compares to focal force balloon angioplasty, rotational atherectomy and other novel treatment options for long severely calcified lesions. SUMMARY FOR ANNOTATED TABLE OF CONTENTS: Percutaneous coronary intervention of long calcified lesions is inherently more complex and higher risk and may require more intensive lesion preparation. This sub-analysis of ORBIT II revealed that orbital atherectomy treatment of longer (≥25-40 mm) lesions was associated with a higher rate of MACE at 30 days, but not at 3 years. This difference, however, was driven primarily by a higher in-hospital non-Q-wave MI rate; using the more contemporary SCAI definition of MI, there was no significant difference in rates of MI between the short (<25 mm) and long (≥25-40 mm) groups.

Predictive value of the geriatric nutritional risk index in percutaneous coronary intervention with rotational atherectomy.

The prognostic value of the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with rotational atherectomy (RA) remains unknown. Therefore, we aimed to clarify whether the GNRI could predict major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients undergoing PCI with RA. A total of 206 patients who underwent PCI with RA from January 2009 to December 2017 were retrospectively tracked. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the GNRI value on admission. MACE comprised all-cause death, target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and myocardial infarction. One year of follow up was completed in 95.6% of patients. During this period, 50 cases of MACE were observed (all-cause death, 32 cases; TLR, 21 cases; and TVR, 2 cases). Patients with a low GNRI (< 98) had a significantly higher incidence of MACE than did patients with a high GNRI (≥ 98) (37.9% vs. 15.5%, log-rank p < 0.05). The GNRI was an independent predictor of MACE (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92-0.97). Furthermore, the GNRI had better predictive power than did its components alone (i.e. body mass index and serum albumin level) (net-reclassification improvement, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.07-0.71; p = 0.01; integrated discrimination improvement, 0.02; 95% CI, - 0.01-0.04; p = 0.07). The GNRI on admission is a predictor of MACE after PCI with RA. Further studies are required to determine whether intensive medical therapy could improve clinical events, particularly cardiovascular death and revascularization, in this population.

Sex differences in procedural and clinical outcomes following rotational atherectomy.

AIM: Evaluate sex differences in procedural net adverse clinical events and long-term outcomes following rotational atherectomy (RA). METHODS AND RESULTS: From August 2010 to 2016, 765 consecutive patients undergoing RA PCI were followed up for a median of 4.7 years. 285 (37%) of subjects were female. Women were older (mean 76 years vs. 72 years; p < .001) and had more urgent procedures (64.6 vs. 47.3%; p < .001). Females received fewer radial procedures (75.1 vs. 85.1%; p < .001) and less intravascular imaging guidance (16.8 vs. 25.0%; p = .008). After propensity score adjustment, the primary endpoint of net adverse cardiac events (net adverse clinical events: all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, target vessel revascularization plus any procedural complication) occurred more often in female patients (15.1 vs. 9.0%; adjusted OR 1.81 95% CI 1.04-3.13; p = .037). This was driven by an increased risk of procedural complications rather than procedural major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Specifically, women were more likely to experience coronary dissection (4.6 vs. 1.3%; p = .008), cardiac tamponade (2.1 vs. 0.4%; p = .046) and significant bleeding (BARC ≥2: 5.3 vs. 2.3). Despite this, overall MACE-free survival was similar between males and females (adjusted HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.80-1.34; p = .81). Procedural complications during RA were associated with almost double the incidence of MACE at long-term follow-up (HR 1.92; 95% CI 1.34-2.77; p < .001). CONCLUSION: Women may be at greater risk of procedural complications following rotational atherectomy. These include periprocedural bleeding episodes and coronary perforation leading to cardiac tamponade. Despite this, the adjusted overall long-term survival free of major adverse cardiac events was similar between males and females.

Comparison of Rotational with Orbital Atherectomy During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Coronary Artery Calcification: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes for patients with significant calcification have been consistently inferior compared to patients without significant calcification. Procedural success and long-term outcomes after PCI have been worse in patients with severe coronary calcium. OBJECTIVE: A Bayesian meta-analysis of outcomes comparing rotational atherectomy (RA) with orbital atherectomy (OA) was performed. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched through 30th November 2018 and identified 4 observational studies. RESULTS: The primary end-point, Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) composing of death, MI and stroke at 1 year was more likely with RA (OR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.11-2.33; p = 0.01) as compared to OA. The driver of the difference in MACE between the two groups was a statistically significant difference in mortality favoring OA (OR = 4.65; 95% CI: 1.36-15.87; p = 0.01). Peri-procedural MI, the other component of the primary end-point was 1.3 times more likely in the RA arm (OR = 1.35; 95% CI 0.95-1.92; p-0.09) and was not statistically different between the groups. The odds of a vascular complication were not different in the two groups (OR = 1.26; 95% CI: 0.73-2.17; p = 0.41). In an adjusted Bayesian analysis, mortality (OR = 3.69; 95% CI: 0.30-38.51), MACE (OR = 1.68; 95% CI: 0.55-5.49), MI (OR = 1.42; 95% CI: 0.50-4.29) and dissections/perforations (OR = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.10-1.38) were not different in RA and OA groups. CONCLUSION: Our study is the first published Bayesian meta-analysis comparing MACE and peri-procedural outcomes in RA compared to OA. These findings lay the foundation for a randomized comparison between the two competing technologies.

In­hospital outcomes of rotational versus orbital atherectomy during percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta­analysis.

BACKGROUND: Data comparing rotational atherectomy (RA) with orbital atherectomy (OA) for calcified lesions is inconclusive and based on single observational studies in populations with limited numbers of patients. AIMS: The aim of the study was to perform a meta­analysis of observational studies comparing RA with OA for calcified lesions prior to percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for studies comparing short­term outcomes of RA with OA prior to percutaneous coronary intervention. Risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random­effects model. RESULTS: Meta­analysis included 6 retrospective studies with 1590 patients treated with RA and 721 with OA. The latter was associated with shorter fluoroscopy time (MD, -3.40 min; 95% CI, -4.76 to -2.04; P <0.001, I2 = 0%), but contrast use was similar (MD, -2.78 ml; 95% CI, -16.04 to 10.47; P = 0.68; I2 = 67%). Although coronary dissection occurred 4­fold more frequently with OA (RR, 3.87; 95% CI, 1.37-10.93; P = 0.01; I2 = 0%), perforations (RR, 2.73; 95% CI, 0.46-16.30, P = 0.27; I2 = 41), tamponade (RR, 1.78; 95% CI, 0.37-8.58; P = 0.47; I2 = 0%), and slow or no­reflow phenomenon (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.35-1.84; P = 0.61; I2 = 0%) occurred with similar frequency. The risk of 30­day or in­hospital myocardial infarction was lower in OA as compared with RA (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47-0.94; P = 0.02; I2 = 0%), yet the risk of in­hospital mortality (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.11-4.64; P = 0.74; I2 = 43%) and length of stay (MD, -0.27 days; 95% CI, -0.76 to -0.23; P = 0.29; I2 = 0%) did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: Orbital atherectomy was associated with a lower risk of early myocardial infarction. However, a higher rate of coronary dissections produced by OA did not translate into increased risk of perforations, slow or no­reflow phenomenon, or in­hospital mortality.

North American Expert Review of Rotational Atherectomy.

Rotational atherectomy (RA) is an established tool in interventional cardiology for treatment of calcified coronary lesions. Over 3 decades of clinical experience and research, techniques have matured and outcomes have improved. Heterogeneity exists, however, in RA utilization and technique. We assembled a group of experienced RA operators and device experts to summarize and critique key elements of contemporary RA technique, to identify areas of consensus and controversy, and to offer recommendations for optimal performance for the practicing interventional cardiologist. Evolution in RA strategy toward a focus on lesion modification to facilitate balloon angioplasty and stenting has underpinned major advances in procedural safety, including opportunity to use smaller caliber equipment and radial access. Optimal technique and improved safety have permitted exploratory use of RA for different lesion types and reevaluation of procedural requirements, including flush solution composition and transvenous pacing. Preparedness to manage complications remains paramount and recommendations for operators and institutions are outlined.

Direct Stenting in Patients Treated with Orbital Atherectomy: An ORBIT II Subanalysis.

BACKGROUND: Direct stenting offers many potential advantages in appropriately selected lesions. Coronary artery calcification increases the complexity and risk of adverse events associated with percutaneous coronary intervention. This study aimed to examine the feasibility of direct stenting after treatment with orbital atherectomy (OA). METHODS: ORBIT II was a single-arm trial enrolling 443 subjects with de novo severely calcified coronary lesions treated with OA; direct stenting was utilized in 59.0% of cases. Procedural outcomes and 3-year major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rates were compared in subjects treated with pre-stent balloon dilatation versus direct stenting after OA. RESULTS: Procedural success (84.2% vs. 93.3%; p = 0.004) was significantly higher in the direct stenting cohort. 3-year MACE occurred less frequently in the direct stenting cohort (29.9% vs. 19.1%; p = 0.006), driven by lower rates of myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization. In a propensity matched analysis, procedural success and 3-year MACE rates were similar in the pre-stent balloon dilatation and direct stenting groups (85.0% vs. 91.8%; p = 0.122 and 28.2% vs. 19.6%; p = 0.078, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Orbital atherectomy facilitates direct stenting and is associated with high procedural success and favorable 3-year outcomes in carefully selected patients. Randomized studies are needed to assess the optimal strategy after lesion preparation with OA.

Safety and Efficacy of Stentablation with Rotational Atherectomy for the Management of Underexpanded and Undilatable Coronary Stents.

INTRODUCTION: Coronary stent underexpansion is associated with in-stent restenosis and few interventions are available for the management of undilatable underexpanded stents. Stentablation (SA) with rotational atherectomy (RA) is a unique application and has previously been described with encouraging results. Data regarding SA is limited to case reports and small case series; therefore, reasonable concern persists regarding procedural safety and long-term outcomes. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study analyzing twenty consecutive patients who underwent SA with RA. The primary endpoint was procedural success and secondary endpoints included procedural safety outcomes and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) over a 12-month follow-up period. RESULTS: Stentablation and secondary stenting were guided by intravascular ultrasound and procedural success was achieved in all cases. No in-hospital death or MACE was observed. The prevalence of MACE was 5% at 30 days as one patient developed recurrent MI without target lesion revascularization (TLR). At 12 months, MACE had occurred in 40% of patients, however this was strongly driven by a high prevalence of TLR (30%). Only one cardiac death (5%) and one additional NSTEMI were observed during the 11 additional months of follow up. CONCLUSION: Stentablation with RA is a feasible and effective option for the acute management of symptomatic, underexpanded, and undilatable coronary stents. SA is associated with a high rate of procedural success as well as excellent in-hospital and short-term outcomes. However, our study population demonstrated substantial MACE at 12 months which was strongly driven by TLR and associated with minimal mortality.

Long-term clinical outcomes of permanent-polymer everolimus-eluting stent implantation following rotational atherectomy for severely calcified de novo coronary lesions: Results of a 22-center study (Tokyo-MD PCI Study).

BACKGROUND: Long-term clinical outcomes of permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent (PP-EES) implantation after rotational atherectomy (RA) have not been fully evaluated. We sought to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes of PP-EES implantation after RA and assess the impact of hemodialysis on this treatment strategy. METHODS: Patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with PP-EES at 22 institutions between January 2010 and December 2011 were enrolled in this multicenter, observational trial. From a total of 1918 registered patients, 113 patients with 115 de-novo lesions who underwent PCI with PP-EES following RA were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) defined as the composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). RESULTS: Long-term follow-up was available for 112 patients (99.1%). The median follow-up period was 2.9 (interquartile range 1.9-3.6) years. The mean age of the patients was 72.3 ±â€¯8.8 years and 64 patients (56.6%) had chronic kidney disease (≥stage 3, 42 on hemodialysis). The cumulative incidences of MACE, non-fatal MI, and TLR were 22.1%, 5.3%, and 10.6%, respectively. Cox's proportional hazards analysis showed that the independent predictors of TLR were hemodialysis and chronic total occlusion. (HR, 14.1; 95% CI, 1.74-155.5; p = 0.01, HR, 9.01; 95% CI, 1.34-62.5; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: PP-EES implantation after lesion modification by RA is considered to be a feasible treatment strategy for heavily calcified lesions. Hemodialysis and chronic total occlusion appeared to be associated with TLR.

Safety and efficacy of radial versus femoral access for rotational Atherectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Over the recent years, there has been increased interest in the use of transradial (TR) access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), including rotational atherectomy (RA). However, a large proportion of operators seem to be reluctant to use TR access for complex PCI including rotational atherectomy for heavily calcified coronary lesions. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Library for studies comparing radial versus femoral access in patients undergoing RA. Studies were included if they reported at least one of the following outcomes in each group separately: major adverse cardiac events (MACE), major bleeding, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction (MI), hospital length of stay, radiation exposure, procedure time, procedure success and all-cause mortality. Odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and a p-value of <0.05 was considered as a level of significance. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 5 retrospective studies with 3315 patients undergoing RA via radial access and 5838 patients via femoral access. Radial access was associated with lower major access site bleeding (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.31-0.67, p < 0.001), and radiation exposure (MD: -16.1, 95%CI: -25.4--6.7 Gy cm2, p = 0.0007). There were no significant differences observed in all-cause in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.69-1.23, p = 0.58); MACE (OR: 0.80, CI: 0.63, 1.02, p = 0.08), stent thrombosis (OR: 0.28, 95%CI: 0.06-1.33 p = 0.11); and MI (OR: 0.43, 95%CI: 0.15-1.24, p = 0.12). There were no significant differences in hospital stay, procedure time or procedure success between the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis of 9153 patients from observational studies demonstrates similar all-cause mortality, MACE, procedural success and procedural time during RA performed using TR access and TF access. However, TR access was associated with decreased access site bleeding and radiation exposure. Given the observational nature of these findings, a randomized controlled trial is warranted for further evidence.

Feasibility and clinical outcome of rotational atherectomy in patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the feasibility, safety, and outcome of rotational atherectomy (RA) in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on the use of RA in patients presenting with ACS. METHODS: This analysis is from an observational registry, which enrolled all consecutive patients undergoing RA in a tertiary center. Between 2002 and 2015, 433 patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) were treated with RA. Within the same period, 108 patients with ACS (8 STEMI and 100 NSTE-ACS) were treated with RA. Procedural success was similar between the ACS and the SCAD groups (96.6% vs. 96.4%, P = 0.90), and no significant difference was observed in procedural complications (slow-flow: 0.8% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.32; coronary dissection: 6.8% vs. 7.2%, P = 1.00; coronary perforation: 0.8% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.69). In-hospital MACE rates were comparable (3.7% vs. 3.2%, P = 0.77). The risk of MACE within 24 months was higher in ACS patients (39.9% vs. 22.4%, log-rank P = 0.002; HR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.12-1.73; P = 0.003). Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified left ventricular ejection fraction (HR 0.97; 95% CI: 0.85-0.99; P = 0.001), treatment with a BMS (HR 2.22, 95% CI: 1.15-4.25, P = 0.02) or early generation drug eluting stent (HR 1.99; 95% CI 1.09-3.64; P = 0.03), as well as ACS presentation (HR 1.53; 95% CI: 1.02-2.29; P = 0.04) as predictors of MACE at two years. CONCLUSIONS: RA is technically feasible and safe in high risk patients presenting with ACS. However, successful application of RA did not mitigate the higher rate of long term cardiovascular events.

Outcomes after Atherectomy Treatment of Severely Calcified Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Single Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Coronary bifurcation and calcified lesions account for 15-20% and 6%-20% of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), respectively. Treatment of these lesions is associated with high periprocedural complication rates and unfavorable long-term clinical outcomes, including high rates of revascularization. This retrospective, single-center study evaluated the outcomes of atherectomy treatment for heavily calcified coronary bifurcation lesions. METHODS: Patients who underwent a coronary atherectomy procedure to treat a heavily calcified lesion between January 2010 and March 2016 at Metropolitan Heart and Vascular Institute (Minneapolis, MN) were included in this retrospective study. Data were stratified to compare atherectomy treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions vs non-bifurcation lesions. Additionally, data were compared based on type of atherectomy utilized during the index procedure, either orbital (OAS) or rotational (RA) atherectomy. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR), were assessed at 30 days post-procedure. RESULTS: Among the 177 patients treated with atherectomy, 72 patients had bifurcation lesions. Compared to patients with non-bifurcation lesions, patients with bifurcation lesions were more likely to have a history of prior PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting. Bifurcation lesions required a higher volume of contrast. There were similar low rates of slow flow/no-reflow (2.8% bifurcations vs 1.0% non-bifurcation; p = 0.355). The 30-day rates of death (1.4% vs 1.9%; p = 0.794), MI (0% vs 0%; p = NA), and TVR (0% vs 1.0%; p = 0.406) were similar in patients with bifurcation lesions versus those without, respectively. An atherectomy sub-analysis (OAS vs RA) of the patients with bifurcation lesions showed that OAS utilization was associated with shorter procedure time (81 min vs 109 min; p = 0.026) and fluoroscopy time (18 min vs 27 min; p = 0.007) compared to RA, respectively-no significant differences in baseline demographic or lesion characteristics were noted in the bifurcation atherectomy sub-groups, except for higher beta/calcium blocker use in RA bifurcation subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrated that atherectomy treatment in patients with heavily calcified coronary bifurcation lesions is feasible, resulting in similar low 30-day MACE rates as compared to patients with non-bifurcation lesions. In addition, in this study OAS utilization versus RA in bifurcation lesions was associated with significantly shorter procedure and fluoroscopy time. Further studies are needed to assess the safety and efficacy of atherectomy in patients with severely calcified bifurcation lesions. SUMMARY FOR ANNOTATED TABLE OF CONTENTS: This retrospective, single-center study evaluated the outcomes of orbital and rotational atherectomy treatment for heavily calcified coronary bifurcation lesions as compared to non-bifurcation lesions. The results demonstrate that atherectomy treatment in patients with heavily calcified coronary bifurcation lesions is feasible, resulting in similarly low 30-day MACE rates as compared to patients with non-bifurcation lesions. In addition, in this study OAS utilization versus RA in bifurcation lesions was associated with significantly shorter procedure and fluoroscopy time.

Procedural and Long-Term Ischemic Outcomes of Tight Subtotal Occlusions Treated with Orbital Atherectomy: An ORBIT II Subanalysis.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Orbital atherectomy is an effective treatment strategy to modify severely calcified coronary lesions prior to stent placement. Traversing a severely calcified subtotal occlusion with the crown may be more challenging compared with a less severely stenotic lesion. The purpose of this ORBIT II subanalysis was to evaluate outcomes post-orbital atherectomy (OA) treatment of lesions with ≥95% stenosis. METHODS/MATERIALS: ORBIT II, a single-arm, prospective, multicenter trial, enrolled 443 subjects with severely calcified coronary lesions. Patients with chronic total occlusions were excluded from the trial. Subjects with the OA device activated were stratified based on pre-procedure percent stenosis: ≥95% stenosis (N = 91) and <95% stenosis (N = 341). Procedural success and 3-year major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rates were compared. RESULTS: The severe angiographic complications rates were 6.6% and 6.7% in the ≥95% and <95% stenosis groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in procedural success (94.5% vs. 88.3%, p = 0.120). 3-year MACE rates were similar (27.1% vs. 22.5%, p = 0.548), as were the rates of cardiac death (5.7% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.665) and MI (7.9% vs. 12.1%, p = 0.244). The TVR rate was higher in the ≥95% stenosis group (19.1% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In ORBIT II, OA treatment of lesions with ≥95% stenosis resulted in a high rate of procedural success. Although the 3-year revascularization rate was higher in the ≥95% stenosis group, it is not unexpected given the challenge of treating such complex lesions. The results of this analysis suggest that OA may be a reasonable treatment strategy for tight, severely calcified subtotal occlusions. SUMMARY: The purpose of this ORBIT II subanalysis was to evaluate outcomes post-orbital atherectomy (OA) treatment of lesions with ≥95% stenosis. In ORBIT II, OA treatment of lesions with ≥95% stenosis resulted in a high rate of procedural success. Although the 3-year revascularization rate was higher in the ≥95% stenosis group, it is not unexpected given the challenge of treating such complex lesions. The results of this analysis suggest that OA may be a reasonable treatment strategy for tight, severely calcified subtotal occlusions.

Revascularization of Left Main Coronary Artery.

Left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease affect 5-7% of patient undergoing coronary angiography and is associated with multivessel CAD in 70% of the cases. Untreated significant LMCA disease is associated with significant mortality and morbidity. CABG is the traditional therapy for revascularization in LMCA disease. PCI is a reasonable alternative mainly in patients with high surgical risk or other specific factors. Drug-eluting stents, improved antiplatelet therapeutic options, atherectomy techniques, IVUS-guidance and improved operator experience have all contributed to the observed improvement in clinical outcomes. Given the large number of variables involved in deciding between PCI and CABG, a heart team should make decisions regarding revascularization of LMCA disease.

High-Speed Rotational Atherectomy Versus Modified Balloons Prior to Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions.

BACKGROUND: Balloon dilatation or debulking seems to be essential to allow successful stent implantation in calcified coronary lesions. Compared with standard balloon predilatation, debulking using high-speed rotational atherectomy (RA) is associated with higher initial procedural success albeit with higher in-stent late lumen loss at intermediate-term follow-up. Whether modified (scoring or cutting) balloons (MB) could achieve similar procedural success compared with RA is not known. In addition, whether new-generation drug-eluting stents could counterbalance the excessive neointimal proliferation triggered by RA remains to be determined. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomly assigned patients with documented myocardial ischemia and severely calcified native coronary lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention to a strategy of lesion preparation using MB or RA followed by drug-eluting stent implantation. Stenting was performed using a third-generation sirolimus-eluting stent with a bioabsorbable polymer. The trial had 2 primary end points: strategy success (defined as successful stent delivery and expansion with attainment of <20% in-stent residual stenosis in the presence of TIMI [Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction] 3 flow without crossover or stent failure; powered for superiority) and in-stent late lumen loss at 9 months (powered for noninferiority). Two hundred patients were enrolled at 2 centers in Germany (n=100 in each treatment group). The mean age of the study population was 74.9±7.0 years; 76% were men, and 33.5% had diabetes mellitus. Strategy success was significantly more common in the RA group (81% versus 98%; relative risk of failure with an MB- versus RA-based strategy, 9.5; 95% CI, 2.3-39.7; P=0.0001), but mean fluoroscopy time was longer (19.6±13.4 versus 23.9±12.2 minutes; P=0.03). At 9 months, mean in-stent late lumen loss was 0.16±0.39 mm in the MB group and 0.22±0.40 mm in the RA group ( P=0.21, P=0.02 for noninferiority). Target lesion revascularization (7% versus 2%; P=0.17), definite or probable stent thrombosis (0% versus 0%; P=1.00), and target vessel failure (8% versus 6%; P=0.78) were low and not significantly different between the MB and RA groups. CONCLUSIONS: Lesion preparation with upfront RA before drug-eluting stent implantation is feasible in nearly all patients with severely calcified coronary lesions, is more commonly successful as a primary strategy compared with MB, and is not associated with excessive late lumen loss. A strategy of provisional MB remains feasible, safe, and effective as long as bailout RA is readily available and may offer the advantages of compatibility with smaller sized catheters and less irradiation. Both strategies are associated with excellent clinical outcome at 9 months. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02502851.

Procedural Success and Outcomes With Increasing Use of Enabling Strategies for Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Enabling strategies (ESs) are increasingly used during percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusive disease (CTO-PCI), enhancing procedural success. Using the British Cardiovascular Society dataset, we examined changes in the use of ESs and procedural/clinical outcomes for CTO-PCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: ESs were defined as intravascular ultrasound, rotational/laser atherectomy, dual arterial access, use of microcatheters, penetration catheters or CrossBoss, and procedures categorized by number of ESs used. Data were analysed on all elective CTO-PCI procedures performed in England and Wales between 2006 and 2014. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of procedural success. During 28 050 CTO-PCIs, there were significant temporal increases in ES use. There was a stepwise increase in CTO success with increased ES use, with 83.8% of cases successful where ≥3 ESs were used. Overall, CTO-PCI success rate for the whole cohort increased from 55.4% in 2006 to 66.9% in 2014 ( P<0.001), but the greatest increase in procedural success was associated with ≥3 ES use. In multivariable analysis, any ES use and the number of ESs used were predictive of procedural success. Coronary perforation increased from 1.2% with zero ES use to 4.0% with ≥3 ( P<0.001). After adjustment, although arterial complication, in-hospital bleeding, in-hospital mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events remained more likely with ES use, 30-day mortality was not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: ES use during CTO-PCI was associated with significant improvements in CTO-PCI success. ES use was associated with increased procedural complications and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events, but not with 30-day mortality.

Temporal changes in radial access use, associates and outcomes in patients undergoing PCI using rotational atherectomy between 2007 and 2014: results from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society national database.

AIMS: Access site choice for cases requiring rotational atherectomy (PCI-ROTA) is poorly defined. Using the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society PCI database, temporal changes and contemporary associates/outcomes of access site choice for PCI-ROTA were studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were analysed from 11,444 PCI-ROTA procedures performed in England and Wales between 2007 and 2014. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of access site choice and its association with outcomes. RESULTS: For PCI-ROTA, radial access increased from 19.6% in 2007 to 58.6% in 2014. Adoption of radial access was slower in females, those with prior CABG, and in patients with chronic occlusive (CTO) or left main disease. In 2013/14, the strongest predictors of femoral artery use were age (OR 1.02, [1.005-1.036], P = .008), CTO intervention (OR 1.95, [1.209-3.314], P = .006), and history of previous CABG (OR 1.68, [1.124-2.515], P = .010). Radial access was associated with reductions in overall length of stay, and increased rates of same-day discharge. Procedural success rates were similar although femoral access use was associated with increased access site complications (2.4 vs. 0.1%, P < .001). After adjustment for baseline differences, arterial complications (OR 15.6, P < .001), transfusion (OR 12.5, P = .023) and major bleeding OR 6.0, P < .001) remained more common with FA use. Adjusted mortality and MACE rates were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In contemporary practice, radial access for PCI-ROTA results in similar procedural success when compared to femoral access but is associated with shorter length of stay, and lower rates of vascular complication, major bleeding and transfusion.

In-hospital outcomes after rotational atherectomy in patients with low ejection fraction.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated angiographic success and in-hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with rotational atherectomy (RA) in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). DESIGN: Between January 2010 and March 2014, 272 consecutive patients with heavily calcified lesions underwent elective PCI with RA. Of these, 33 patients had LVEF ≤35% (low LVEF group), whereas 237 patients had LVEF >35% (preserved LVEF group). The primary endpoint was angiographic success and in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE). MACE included death from any cause, postprocedure onset MI, emergency coronary artery bypass grafting, and target vessel revascularization. The secondary endpoints were MACE and the components within 30days after PCI. The components of MACE were evaluated. RESULTS: Angiographic success, defined as <30% residual stenosis with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow 3 at final angiography, was achieved in all patients without fatal complications. Intra-aortic ballon pumping (IABP) was used significantly more frequently in the low LVEF group compared with the preserved LVEF group (15.2% vs. 2.1%, p = .003). There were no significant differences between groups regarding in-hospital and clinical outcomes within 30 days following PCI. CONCLUSION: If medications and mechanical support were appropriately performed, the angiographic success rate and in-hospital MACE rate of PCI with RA in patients with low LVEF could be expected to have good outcomes similar to those for patients with preserved LVEF.