Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 61
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Open ; 14(9): e086800, 2024 Sep 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39242164

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate the cost-effectiveness of individually tailored self-management support, delivered via the artificial intelligence-based selfBACK app, as an add-on to usual care for people with low back pain (LBP). DESIGN: Secondary health-economic analysis of the selfBACK randomised controlled trial (RCT) with a 9-month follow-up conducted from a Danish national healthcare perspective (primary scenario) and a societal perspective limited to long-term productivity in the form of long-term absenteeism (secondary scenario). SETTING: Primary care and an outpatient spine clinic in Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: A subset of Danish participants in the selfBACK RCT, including 297 adults with LBP randomised to the intervention (n=148) or the control group (n=149). INTERVENTIONS: App-delivered evidence-based, individually tailored self-management support as an add-on to usual care compared with usual care alone among people with LBP. OUTCOME MEASURES: Costs of healthcare usage and productivity loss, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) based on the EuroQol-5L Dimension Questionnaire, meaningful changes in LBP-related disability measured by the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), costs (healthcare and productivity loss measured in Euro) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS: The incremental costs were higher for the selfBACK intervention (mean difference €230 (95% CI -136 to 595)), where ICERs showed an increase in costs of €7336 per QALY gained in the intervention group, and €1302 and €1634 for an additional person with minimal important change on the PSEQ and RMDQ score, respectively. At a cost-effectiveness threshold value of €23250, the selfBACK intervention has a 98% probability of being cost-effective. Analysis of productivity loss was very sensitive, which creates uncertainty about the results from a societal perspective limited to long-term productivity. CONCLUSIONS: From a healthcare perspective, the selfBACK intervention is likely to represent a cost-effective treatment for people with LBP. However, including productivity loss introduces uncertainty to the results. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03798288.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Dor Lombar , Aplicativos Móveis , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Autogestão , Humanos , Dor Lombar/terapia , Dor Lombar/economia , Dinamarca , Autogestão/métodos , Autogestão/economia , Masculino , Feminino , Aplicativos Móveis/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Análise de Custo-Efetividade
2.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 30(9): 917-928, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39109990

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Reducing the risks of complications is a primary goal of diabetes management, with effective glycemic control a key factor. Glucose monitoring using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology is an important part of diabetes self-management, helping patients reach and maintain targeted glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. Although clinical guidelines recommended CGM use, coverage by Medicaid is limited, likely because of cost concerns. OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of FreeStyle Libre CGM systems, compared with capillary-based self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), in US individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus using basal insulin. METHODS: A patient-level microsimulation model was used to compare CGM with SMBG for a population of 10,000 patients. A 10-year horizon was used, with an annual discount rate of 3.0% for costs and utilities. Model population characteristics were based on US national epidemiology data. Patient outcomes were based on published clinical trials and real-world studies. Annual costs, reflective of 2023 values, included CGM and SMBG acquisition costs and the costs of treating diabetic ketoacidosis, severe hypoglycemia, and diabetes complications. The effect of CGM was modeled as a persistent 1.1% reduction in HbA1c relative to SMBG based on US real-world evidence. Disutilities were based on published clinical trials and other relevant literature. The primary outcome was cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the validity of the model results when accounting for a plausible variation of inputs. RESULTS: In the base case analysis, CGM was dominant to SMBG, providing more QALYs (6.18 vs 5.97) at a lower cost ($70,137 vs $71,809) over the 10-year time horizon. A $10,456 increase in glucose monitoring costs was offset by a $12,127 reduction in treatment costs. Cost savings reflected avoidance of acute diabetic events (savings owing to reductions in severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis were $271 and $2,159, respectively) and a reduced cumulative incidence of diabetes complications, particularly renal failure (saving $5,292), myocardial infarction (saving $1,996), and congestive heart failure (saving $1,061). Scenario analyses were consistent with the base case results, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for CGM vs SMBG ranged from dominant to cost-effective. In probabilistic analysis, CGM was 100% likely to be cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: CGM is cost-effective compared with SMBG for US patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving basal insulin therapy. This suggests that state Medicaid programs could benefit from broader coverage of CGM.


Assuntos
Automonitorização da Glicemia , Glicemia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Medicaid , Autogestão , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Automonitorização da Glicemia/economia , Estados Unidos , Medicaid/economia , Glicemia/efeitos dos fármacos , Glicemia/metabolismo , Autogestão/economia , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Hipoglicemiantes/economia , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/metabolismo , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Insulina/uso terapêutico , Insulina/economia , Insulina/administração & dosagem , Monitoramento Contínuo da Glicose , Análise de Custo-Efetividade
3.
Telemed J E Health ; 30(8): 2353-2362, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38916871

RESUMO

Background: Telemonitoring programs have been found to be effective in improving diabetic control by promoting patients' self-management of diabetes through medication adherence, dietary modifications, and exercise. Nonetheless, few studies have assessed the cost-effectiveness of telemonitoring for the self-management of diabetes based on real-world data. Methods: A randomized controlled trial entitled Optimizing care of Patients via Telehealth In Monitoring and Augmenting their control of Diabetes Mellitus was conducted among adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Singapore. Individuals in the intervention group (n = 159) underwent a telemonitoring program comprising of remote patient monitoring, education, individualized health coaching, and teleconsultations, whereas individuals in the control group (n = 160) received regular care. Economic evaluation was conducted from health care system and societal perspectives in 2020 in Singapore dollars, using health outcomes and costs documented at baseline and at 6 month follow-up. One-way sensitivity analyses and bootstrapping to generate scatter plot on cost-effectiveness planes were done. Results: The adjusted reduction in HbA1c scores was greater in the intervention group by -0.41 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.65 to -0.17), while the change in utility scores was higher in the intervention group by 0.011 (95% CI, -0.016 to 0.0378). From a health care perspective, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the telemonitoring program per unit improvement in HbA1c, per additional case of well-controlled diabetes, and per unit improvement in quality adjusted life years was SGD 580.44, SGD 9100.15, and SGD 21,476.36, respectively. From a societal perspective, the ICERs were SGD 817.20, SGD 12,812.02, and SGD 30,236.36, respectively. Conclusions: The Optimizing care of Patients via Telehealth In Monitoring and Augmenting their control of Diabetes Mellitus telemonitoring program was effective and potentially cost-effective for the management and control of diabetes among patients in primary care.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Telemedicina , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Masculino , Singapura , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Telemedicina/economia , Idoso , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Adulto , Autogestão/métodos , Autogestão/economia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida
4.
Lancet Rheumatol ; 6(7): e424-e437, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38824934

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Low back pain is prevalent and a leading cause of disability. We aimed to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of an accessible, scalable internet intervention for supporting behavioural self-management (SupportBack). METHODS: Participants in UK primary care with low back pain without serious spinal pathology were randomly assigned 1:1:1 using computer algorithms stratified by disability level and telephone-support centre to usual care, usual care and SupportBack, or usual care and SupportBack with physiotherapist telephone-support (three brief calls). The primary outcome was low back pain-related disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire [RMDQ] score) at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months using a repeated measures model, analysed by intention to treat using 97·5% CIs. A parallel economic evaluation from a health services perspective was used to estimate cost-effectiveness. People with lived experience of low back pain were involved in this trial from the outset. This completed trial was registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN14736486. FINDINGS: Between Nov 29, 2018, and Jan 12, 2021, 825 participants were randomly assigned (274 to usual care, 275 to SupportBack only, 276 to SupportBack with telephone-support). Participants had a mean age of 54 (SD 15), 479 (58%) of 821 were women and 342 (42%) were men, and 591 (92%) of 641 were White. Follow-up rates were 687 (83%) at 6 weeks, 598 (73%) at 3 months, 589 (72%) at 6 months, and 652 (79%) at 12 months. For the primary analysis, 736 participants were analysed (249 usual care, 245 SupportBack, and 242 SupportBack with telephone support). At a significance level of 0·025, there was no difference in RMDQ over 12 months with SupportBack versus usual care (adjusted mean difference -0·5 [97·5% CI -1·2 to 0·2]; p=0·085) or SupportBack with telephone-support versus usual care (-0·6 [-1·2 to 0·1]; p=0·048). There were no treatment-related serious adverse events. The economic evaluation showed that the SupportBack group dominated usual care, being both more effective and less costly. Both interventions were likely to be cost-effective at a threshold of £20 000 per quality adjusted life year compared with usual care. INTERPRETATION: The SupportBack internet interventions did not significantly reduce low back pain-related disability over 12 months compared with usual care. They were likely to be cost-effective and safe. Clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and safety should be considered together when determining whether to apply these interventions in clinical practice. FUNDING: National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment (16/111/78).


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Dor Lombar , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Autogestão , Telefone , Humanos , Dor Lombar/terapia , Dor Lombar/economia , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Autogestão/métodos , Autogestão/economia , Adulto , Intervenção Baseada em Internet , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino Unido , Avaliação da Deficiência , Internet
5.
Eye Contact Lens ; 50(6): 259-264, 2024 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38625757

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Dry eye is a common condition that can decrease the quality of life. This survey-based study of persons with dry eye investigated self-reported treatments (initial, current), out-of-pocket expenses, time spent on self-management, sources of care, and sources of information about their condition. METHODS: Online dry eye newsletters and support groups were emailed a link to an electronic survey asking members to participate. Survey respondents were not required to answer every question. RESULTS: In total, 639 persons with self-reported dry eye responded (86% women, 14% men [n=623]; mean ± SD age, 55 ± 14 years [n=595]). Artificial tears were the most reported intervention (76% initially, 71% currently). The median (interquartile range) out-of-pocket treatment cost annually was $500 ($200-$1,320 [n=506]). In addition, 55% (n=544) estimated 5 to 20 min daily on self-management; 22% spent an hour or more. Ophthalmologists provided most dry eye care (67%, n=520). Only 48% (n=524) reported that their primary source of dry eye information came from their eye care clinician. CONCLUSIONS: Artificial tears are the primary treatment for dry eye. Ophthalmologists provide most dry eye care, but half of patients report that their eye care provider is not their primary source of information. Almost one fourth of patients spend an hour or more daily on treatments.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Síndromes do Olho Seco , Síndromes do Olho Seco/economia , Síndromes do Olho Seco/prevenção & controle , Síndromes do Olho Seco/terapia , Fonte de Informação/estatística & dados numéricos , Lubrificantes Oftálmicos/economia , Lubrificantes Oftálmicos/uso terapêutico , Oftalmologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Autogestão/economia , Autogestão/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tempo , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso
6.
Value Health ; 27(7): 889-896, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38492924

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Pelvic organ prolapse is the descent of one or more reproductive organs from their normal position, causing associated negative symptoms. One conservative treatment option is pessary management. This study aimed to to investigate the cost-effectiveness of pessary self-management (SM) when compared with clinic-based care (CBC). A decision analytic model was developed to extend the economic evaluation. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial with health economic evaluation. The SM group received a 30-minute SM teaching session, information leaflet, 2-week follow-up call, and a local helpline number. The CBC group received routine outpatient pessary appointments, determined by usual practice. The primary outcome for the cost-effectiveness analysis was incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), 18 months post-randomization. Uncertainty was handled using nonparametric bootstrap analysis. In addition, a simple decision analytic model was developed using the trial data to extend the analysis over a 5-year period. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the mean number of QALYs gained between SM and CBC (1.241 vs 1.221), but mean cost was lower for SM (£578 vs £728). The incremental net benefit estimated at a willingness to pay of £20 000 per QALY gained was £564, with an 80.8% probability of cost-effectiveness. The modeling results were consistent with the trial analysis: the incremental net benefit was estimated as £4221, and the probability of SM being cost-effective at 5 years was 69.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that pessary SM is likely to be cost-effective. The decision analytic model suggests that this result is likely to persist over longer durations.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Pessários , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Pessários/economia , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/terapia , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/economia , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Autogestão/economia , Autogestão/métodos , Modelos Econômicos
7.
J Parkinsons Dis ; 11(4): 2085-2091, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34366368

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex and debilitating condition that requires care from a multispecialty team. The Integrated Parkinson Care Network (IPCN) is an innovative pragmatic care model that focuses on integrated care, self-management support and technology-enabled care. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to estimate the costs of the IPCN and assess whether benefits gained from the intervention offset its costs based on a single center experience. METHODS: We conducted a return on investment (ROI) analysis of the IPCN from a societal perspective. The ROI for the IPCN was estimated as a ratio of the net savings and the intervention cost. The intervention cost was calculated as a sum of set-up and implementation costs. Cost savings was measured as the absolute reduction in the societal costs realized by PD patients. A positive ROI indicated that savings generated from the intervention offset its cost. RESULTS: The total cost of the IPCN for 100 PD patients was C$135,669, or C$226 per patient per month. IPCN was associated with the reduction in societal cost of C$915 per patient per month (95%CI: -2,782, 951). The ROI per PD patient per month for the IPCN was 3.08 (95%CI: -0.60, 22.93), suggesting that for every C$1 invested in the IPCN, C$4.08 is gained through reduction in societal costs. The returns were greater among advanced PD patients. CONCLUSION: The IPCN has the potential to offer a good return on investment for PD patients, and its value for money is higher among advanced PD patients.


Assuntos
Doença de Parkinson , Autogestão , Redução de Custos , Humanos , Doença de Parkinson/terapia , Projetos Piloto , Autogestão/economia
8.
Value Health ; 24(9): 1245-1253, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34452703

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Programmatic cost assessment of novel clinical interventions can inform their widespread dissemination and implementation. This study aimed to determine the programmatic costs of a telehealth Ostomy Self-Management Training (OSMT) intervention for cancer survivors using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC) methodology. METHODS: We demonstrated a step-by-step application of TDABC based on a process map with core OSMT intervention activities and associated procedures and determined resource use and costs, per unit procedure. We also assessed per-patient costs from a payer perspective and provided estimates of total hours and costs by personnel, activity, and procedure. RESULTS: The per-patient cost of the OSMT was $1758. Personnel time accounted for 91% of the total cost. Site supervisor and information technology technician time were the most expensive personnel resources. Telehealth technical and communication equipment accounted for 8% of the total cost. Intervention coordination and monitoring efforts represented most of the total time cost (62%), followed by the intervention delivery (35%). The procedures with the highest cost were communication via phone or virtual meetings (24%), email exchanges (18%), and telehealth session delivery (18%). CONCLUSIONS: Future efforts to replicate, disseminate, and implement the OSMT intervention should anticipate funding for nonclinical components of the intervention, including coordination and monitoring, and consider how these activities can be performed most efficiently. For institutions without established telemedicine programs, selection of videoconferencing platforms and adequate staffing for participant technical support should be considered. Our step-by-step application of TDABC serves as a case study demonstrating how interventionists can gather data on resource use and costs of intervention activities concurrently with their collection of trial data.


Assuntos
Custos e Análise de Custo , Estomia , Autogestão/economia , Autogestão/educação , Telemedicina , Humanos
9.
J Sci Med Sport ; 24(11): 1155-1160, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34246553

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: A stepped-down program is one where clients transition from the care of a health professional to self-managed care. This study reviewed the effectiveness of stepped-down interventions to promote self-managed physical activity for health in military service veterans. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: Literature searches of 11 electronic databases were performed (up to 28th April 2020) to identify randomised controlled trials that assessed self-managed physical activity interventions in military service veterans. Data were extracted on study characteristics, intervention programs (with strategies mapped against a taxonomy of behaviour change techniques), and physical activity outcomes; secondary outcomes were physical fitness/function, psychosocial health, and cost effectiveness. Study quality was assessed using a 15-item checklist adapted from the TESTEX scale. RESULTS: Searches identified 26 studies (all from the United States; N = 45 to 531 participants) representing 17 intervention programs. Studies were of good quality (M = 10.7; SD = 2.3). More than half (54%) reported positive between-group intervention effects for physical activity outcomes (mean increase of 80 min/week in self-reported physical activity at 10-12 months). Physical fitness/function outcomes improved in 38% of studies, but no studies found significant intervention effects for psychosocial health or cost effectiveness outcomes. Behaviour change techniques most frequently used to elicit physical activity changes were education, goal setting, goal review and self-monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Stepped-down programs that include specific behaviour change techniques have the potential to promote self-management of physical activity in military service veterans. Multi-national randomised controlled trials that use objective physical activity measures are needed to further build the evidence base.


Assuntos
Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Autogestão , Veteranos/psicologia , Acelerometria , Análise Custo-Benefício , Exercício Físico , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Aptidão Física , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/economia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Autogestão/economia
10.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 106(7): e2469-e2479, 2021 06 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34042985

RESUMO

CONTEXT: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted healthcare environment. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of the pandemic on self-reported outcomes in patients with adrenal insufficiency (AI). DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective longitudinal survey study at 2 tertiary centers. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with AI. INTERVENTION: Patient-centered questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21, Short Form-36, and AI self-management. RESULTS: Of 342 patients, 157 (46%) had primary AI, 109 (32%) had secondary AI, and 76 (22%) had glucocorticoid-induced AI. When compared to prepandemic, daily glucocorticoid dose and number of adrenal crises did not change. However, patients reported a higher financial impact from AI (34% vs 23%, P = 0.006) and difficulty accessing medical care (31% vs 7%, P < 0.0001) during the pandemic. A third of patients reported difficulty managing AI during the pandemic. After adjusting for duration and subtypes of AI, younger patients [odds ratio (OR) 2.3, CI 95% 1.3-4.1], women (OR 3.7, CI 95% 1.9-7.1), poor healthcare access(OR 4.2, CI 95% 2.3-7.7), lack of good insurance support (OR 2.8, CI 95% 1.3-5.9), and those with a higher financial impact (OR 2.3, CI 95% 1.3-4.3) reported greater difficulties managing AI. Patients were more likely to report a higher anxiety score (≥8) if they found managing AI challenging during the pandemic (OR 3.0, CI 95% 1.3-6.9), and had lower Physical Component Summary (OR 4.9, CI 95% 2.2-11.0) and Mental Component Summary (OR 4.1, CI 95% 1.8-9.5) scores prior to the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: A third of patients with AI reported difficulties with management of AI during the pandemic, particularly in younger patients, women, and those with poor healthcare access.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Adrenal/tratamento farmacológico , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Autogestão/estatística & dados numéricos , Insuficiência Adrenal/economia , Insuficiência Adrenal/psicologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Ansiedade/etiologia , Ansiedade/psicologia , COVID-19/economia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/psicologia , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/normas , Feminino , Estresse Financeiro/diagnóstico , Estresse Financeiro/epidemiologia , Estresse Financeiro/psicologia , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Glucocorticoides/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias/economia , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Questionário de Saúde do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Risco , Autorrelato/estatística & dados numéricos , Autogestão/economia , Fatores Sexuais , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
11.
Pediatr Diabetes ; 22(5): 807-815, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33887095

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the relationships among financial stress factors (perceived stress, financial stress, and financial independence) and psychological factors (depressive symptoms, trait anxiety, and diabetes distress) on self-management outcomes (HbA1c and diabetes-related quality of life) in emerging adults with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A descriptive, correlational, cross-sectional study examined 413 emerging adults, ages 18-25, from the Type 1 Diabetes Exchange Clinic Registry. Data were collected via REDCap surveys using the Personal Financial Well-Being Scale, Willingness to Pay Scale, Financial Independence Visual Analog Scale, Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Inventory, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, The Type 1 Diabetes Distress Scale, and Diabetes Quality of Life Measure. Hierarchical Multiple Regression analyses explored significant barriers to self-management outcomes. RESULTS: Hierarchical Multiple Regression analyses revealed that 20.6% of variance in HbA1c (F = 15.555, p < 0.001) was explained by greater financial stress (ß = -0.197, p < 0.001), willingness to pay (ß = -0.220, p < 0.001), disease duration (ß = 0.119, p = 0.014), and diabetes distress (ß = 0.181, p < 0.001); 64.5% of the variance in diabetes-related quality of life (F = 148.469, p < 0.001) was significantly explained by greater financial stress (ß = -0.112, p = 0.002), diabetes distress (ß = 0.512, p < 0.001), trait anxiety (ß = 0.183, p = 0.001) and depressive symptoms (ß = 0.162, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Greater financial stress and psychological factors have detrimental impacts on self-management outcomes during emerging adulthood. Diabetes providers need to identify and address these factors in routine care and advocate for policy changes to support improved self-management outcomes.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiologia , Estresse Financeiro/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Depressão/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Autogestão/economia , Autogestão/psicologia , Autogestão/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
12.
PLoS One ; 16(3): e0247522, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33647039

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A large body of evidence suggests that self-management interventions (SMIs) may improve outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, accurate comparisons of the relative effectiveness of SMIs are challenging, partly due to heterogeneity of outcomes across trials and uncertainty about the importance of these outcomes for patients. We aimed to develop a core set of patient-relevant outcomes (COS) for SMIs trials to enhance comparability of interventions and ensure person-centred care. METHODS: We undertook an innovative approach consisting of four interlinked stages: i) Development of an initial catalogue of outcomes from previous EU-funded projects and/or published studies, ii) Scoping review of reviews on patients and caregivers' perspectives to identify outcomes of interest, iii) Two-round Delphi online survey with patients and patient representatives to rate the importance of outcomes, and iv) Face-to-face consensus workshop with patients, patient representatives, health professionals and researchers to develop the COS. RESULTS: From an initial list of 79 potential outcomes, 16 were included in the COS plus one supplementary outcome relevant to all participants. These were related to patient and caregiver knowledge/competence, self-efficacy, patient activation, self-monitoring, adherence, smoking cessation, COPD symptoms, physical activity, sleep quality, caregiver quality of life, activities of daily living, coping with the disease, participation and decision-making, emergency room visits/admissions and cost effectiveness. CONCLUSION: The development of the COPD COS for the evaluation of SMIs will increase consistency in the measurement and reporting of outcomes across trials. It will also contribute to more personalized health care and more informed health decisions in clinical practice as patients' preferences regarding COPD outcomes are more systematically included.


Assuntos
Cuidadores/psicologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/psicologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Autocuidado/métodos , Autogestão/métodos , Atividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Técnica Delphi , Exercício Físico , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Cooperação do Paciente , Qualidade de Vida , Autocuidado/economia , Autogestão/economia , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Diabet Med ; 38(4): e14503, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33351189

RESUMO

AIMS: Diabetes distress affects approximately 36% of adults with diabetes and is associated with worse diabetes self-management and poor glycaemic control. We characterized participants' diabetes distress and studied the relationship between social support and diabetes distress. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we surveyed a population-based sample of adults with type 2 diabetes covered by Alabama Medicaid. We used the Diabetes Distress Scale assessing emotional burden, physician-related, regimen-related and interpersonal distress. We assessed participants' level of diabetes-specific social support and satisfaction with this support, categorized as low or moderate-high. We performed multivariable logistic regression of diabetes distress by level of and satisfaction with social support, adjusting for demographics, disease severity, self-efficacy and depressive symptoms. RESULTS: In all, 1147 individuals participated; 73% were women, 41% White, 58% Black and 3% Hispanic. Low level of or satisfaction with social support was reported by 11% of participants; 7% of participants had severe diabetes distress. Participants with low satisfaction with social support were statistically significantly more likely to have severe diabetes distress than those with moderate-high satisfaction, adjusted odds ratio 2.43 (95% CI 1.30, 4.54). CONCLUSIONS: Interventions addressing diabetes distress in adults with type 2 diabetes may benefit from a focus on improving diabetes-specific social support.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicologia , Angústia Psicológica , Apoio Social , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Alabama/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Autoeficácia , Autogestão/economia , Autogestão/psicologia , Autogestão/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
14.
Clin Rehabil ; 35(5): 703-717, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33233972

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine the cost-effectiveness of self-managed computerised word finding therapy as an add-on to usual care for people with aphasia post-stroke. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness modelling over a life-time period, taking a UK National Health Service (NHS) and personal social service perspective. SETTING: Based on the Big CACTUS randomised controlled trial, conducted in 21 UK NHS speech and language therapy departments. PARTICIPANTS: Big CACTUS included 278 people with long-standing aphasia post-stroke. INTERVENTIONS: Computerised word finding therapy plus usual care; usual care alone; usual care plus attention control. MAIN MEASURES: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated, comparing the cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained for each intervention. Credible intervals (CrI) for costs and QALYs, and probabilities of cost-effectiveness, were obtained using probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Subgroup and scenario analyses investigated cost-effectiveness in different subsets of the population, and the sensitivity of results to key model inputs. RESULTS: Adding computerised word finding therapy to usual care had an ICER of £42,686 per QALY gained compared with usual care alone (incremental QALY gain: 0.02 per patient (95% CrI: -0.05 to 0.10); incremental costs: £732.73 per patient (95% CrI: £674.23 to £798.05)). ICERs for subgroups with mild or moderate word finding difficulties were £22,371 and £21,262 per QALY gained respectively. CONCLUSION: Computerised word finding therapy represents a low cost add-on to usual care, but QALY gains and estimates of cost-effectiveness are uncertain. Computerised therapy is more likely to be cost-effective for people with mild or moderate, as opposed to severe, word finding difficulties.


Assuntos
Afasia/reabilitação , Terapia da Linguagem/economia , Autogestão/economia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicações , Terapia Assistida por Computador/economia , Afasia/etiologia , Doença Crônica , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Medicina Estatal , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Reino Unido
15.
J Asthma ; 58(3): 360-369, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31755329

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Priorities of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 6|18 Initiative include outpatient asthma self-management education (ASME) and home-based asthma visits (home visit) as interventions for children with poorly-controlled asthma. ASME and home visit intervention programs are currently not widely available. This project was to assess the economic sustainability of these programs for state asthma control programs reimbursed by Medicaid. METHODS: We used a simulation model based on parameters from the literature and Medicaid claims, controlling for regression to the mean. We modeled scenarios under various selection criteria based on healthcare utilization and age to forecast the return on investment (ROI) using data from New York. The resulting tool is available in Excel or Python. RESULTS: Our model projected health improvement and cost savings for all simulated interventions. Compared against home visits alone, the simulated ASME alone intervention had a higher ROI for all healthcare utilization and age scenarios. Savings were primarily highest in simulated program participants who had two or more asthma-related emergency department visits or one inpatient visit compared to those participants who had one or more asthma-related emergency department visits. Segmenting the selection criteria by age did not significantly change the results. CONCLUSIONS: This model forecasts reduced healthcare costs and improved health outcomes as a result of ASME and home visits for children with high urgent healthcare utilization (more than two emergency department visits or one inpatient hospitalization) for asthma. Utilizing specific selection criteria, state based asthma control programs can improve health and reduce healthcare costs.


Assuntos
Asma/terapia , Visita Domiciliar/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/organização & administração , Autogestão/educação , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise Custo-Benefício , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde/economia , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Cadeias de Markov , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Estatísticos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/economia , Autogestão/economia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Estados Unidos
17.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 17: E48, 2020 06 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32584754

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Low- and middle-income, middle-aged adults have high rates of disease and death from chronic disease, yet their participation in self-management programs is low. This may be because advertisements for such programs often target elderly, predominantly white, affluent adults. Our study used data from a parent randomized controlled trial to identify theoretically driven advertisement cues to engage low- and middle-income, middle-aged adults in the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP). METHODS: A framework that combined the Elaboration Likelihood Model and Protection Motivation Theory was used to guide χ2 and regression analyses to assess relationships between advertisement cue preferences and 5 stages of cognitive engagement (cue processing, cognitive appraisal of the advertised study, motivation to enroll) and behavioral engagement of study participants (enrollment and program participation). RESULTS: One advertisement cue (taking control of one's future) and 1 cue combination (financial security and taking control of one's future) were significantly associated with study enrollment, as were motivation to enroll and cue processing. CONCLUSION: These results can inform CDSMP recruitment efforts to better engage low- and middle-income, middle-aged adults in an effort to mitigate the disproportionate burden of chronic disease in this population.


Assuntos
Publicidade/métodos , Participação do Paciente/psicologia , Autogestão/métodos , Doença Crônica/psicologia , Doença Crônica/terapia , Sinais (Psicologia) , Status Econômico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Autogestão/economia
18.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 105(9)2020 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32593172

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Acromegaly is an insidious disease associated with severe somatic morbidity but data on socioeconomic status are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To study the socioeconomic status in acromegaly in a population-based follow-up study. METHODS: All incident cases of acromegaly (n = 576) during the period 1977-2010 were included. For every patient, 100 persons were sampled from the general population matched for date of birth and gender (comparison cohort). Cox regression and hazard ratios (HR), conditional logistic regression and linear regression with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used. OUTCOME MEASURES: Retirement, social security benefit, annual income, cohabitation, separation, parenthood and educational level. RESULTS: The proportion of retired individuals was significantly higher in patients with acromegaly after the time of diagnosis (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.26-1.62) and also during the 5-year pre-diagnostic period (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.03-1.28). More individuals with acromegaly received social security benefit compared with the comparison cohort during the initial period after the time of diagnosis. Among patients who maintained a job, the annual income was similar to the comparison cohort. Compared with the background population, cohabitation was lower (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50-0.95) as was parenthood (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.39-0.80), whereas neither educational level (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.35-1.06) nor separation (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.86-1.47) were different. Female gender and insufficient disease control were associated with a significantly worse socioeconomic status. CONCLUSIONS: 1) Socioeconomic status is impaired in patients with acromegaly even before a diagnosis of acromegaly. 2) Females and patients without disease remission have worse outcomes. 3) Early diagnosis and effective treatment of acromegaly could be important factors in mitigating the negative impact on socioeconomic factors.


Assuntos
Acromegalia/epidemiologia , Acromegalia/terapia , Autogestão , Acromegalia/economia , Acromegalia/patologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Escolaridade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pais/psicologia , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Sistema de Registros , Aposentadoria/economia , Aposentadoria/estatística & dados numéricos , Autoeficácia , Autogestão/economia , Autogestão/psicologia , Autogestão/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Sexuais , Classe Social , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto Jovem
19.
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med ; 30(1): 23, 2020 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32483186

RESUMO

Management of intermittent allergic rhinitis (IAR) is suboptimal in the UK. An Australian community pharmacy-based intervention has been shown to help patients better self-manage their IAR. We conducted a pilot cluster RCT in 12 Scottish community pharmacies to assess transferability of the Australian intervention. Trained staff in intervention pharmacies delivered the intervention to eligible customers (n = 60). Non-intervention pharmacy participants (n = 65) received usual care. Outcome measures included effect size of change in the mini-Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (miniRQLQ) between baseline, 1-week and 6-week follow-up. Trial procedures were well received by pharmacy staff, and customer satisfaction with the intervention was high. The standardised effect size for miniRQLQ total score was -0.46 (95% CI, -1.05, 0.13) for all participants and -0.14 (95% CI,-0.86, 0.57) in the complete case analysis, suggesting a small overall treatment effect in the intervention group. A full-scale RCT is warranted to fully evaluate the effectiveness of this service.


Assuntos
Farmacêuticos , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/terapia , Autogestão/métodos , Adulto , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/economia , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Projetos Piloto , Qualidade de Vida , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/economia , Autogestão/economia , Autogestão/educação , Inquéritos e Questionários
20.
Acta Diabetol ; 57(9): 1049-1056, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32248347

RESUMO

AIMS: The past 3 decades witnessed the rapid growth of diabetes in China. To better serve large numbers of patients, the Chinese Medical Doctor Association launched metabolic management center (MMC) program which is featured with a one-stop and comprehensive diabetes management mode in 2016. It is worth exploring whether MMC model is better than conventional models in management. METHODS: In this study, 228 patients with type 2 diabetes were recruited, and 193 patients completed the study. Therapeutic effects and health care costs were analyzed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that decreases in HbA1C and TG/HDL-C values were significantly greater in the MMC group than in the control group. The increase in HDL-C was significantly higher in the MMC group than in the control group. The percentage of patients whose HbA1C lower than 7% was significantly higher in the MMC group. The results of the UKPDS model simulation showed that within 30 years, with the slight increases in treatment costs, the average life expectancy and total QALE of the MMC group are higher than those of the control group by 0.61 and 0.51 year, respectively. Further study showed that the drug intervention in the MMC group was significantly stronger. In addition, the questionnaires revealed that MMC group performed better in diabetes knowledge tests and have higher patient satisfaction rates of medical services. More patients in the MMC group adopted a more favorable diet strategy. These advantages enable MMC to achieve more short-term and long-term benefits in diabetes treatment than conventional mode.


Assuntos
Assistência Integral à Saúde , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Autogestão , Padrão de Cuidado , China/epidemiologia , Assistência Integral à Saúde/métodos , Assistência Integral à Saúde/organização & administração , Assistência Integral à Saúde/normas , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/economia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/organização & administração , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/normas , Satisfação do Paciente , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Autogestão/economia , Autogestão/métodos , Autogestão/psicologia , Padrão de Cuidado/economia , Padrão de Cuidado/organização & administração , Padrão de Cuidado/normas , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA