Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 153
Filtrar
1.
Stroke ; 52(7): 2371-2378, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34039034

RESUMO

Background and Purpose: We determined the association between hospital factors, performance on transient ischemic attack (TIA) process measures, and 90-day ischemic stroke incidence. Methods: Longitudinal analysis of retrospectively obtained data on 9168 veterans ≥18 years with TIA presenting to the emergency department or inpatient unit at 69 Veterans Affairs hospitals with ≥10 eligible patients per year in fiscal years 2015 to 2018. Process measures were high/moderate potency statin within 7 days of discharge, antithrombotic by day 2, and hypertension control (<140/90 mm Hg) at 90 days. The outcome was 90-day stroke incidence. Results: During the 4-year study period, hospitals significantly increased statin use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] per 1-year increase, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.17­1.32]; P<0.001), whereas neither hypertension control (P=0.44) nor antithrombotic use (P=0.82) improved over time. Hospitals that admitted a higher proportion of TIA patients versus emergency department discharge had significantly greater use of statins (aOR per 10-percentage point increase in the proportion of TIA patients admitted, 1.09 [1.03­1.16]; P=0.003) and antithrombotics (aOR per 10-percentage point increase in TIA patients admitted, 1.14 [1.06­1.23]; P<0.001). Hospitals with higher emergency physician staffing and lower TIA patient volume had greater use of antithrombotics (aOR per 1 full-time physician increase, 1.05 [1.01­1.08]; P=0.008 and aOR per 10-patient decrease in volume, 1.09 [1.01­1.16]; P=0.02). Higher emergency physician staffing was associated with lower 90-day stroke incidence (aOR per 1 full-time physician increase, 0.96 [0.92­0.99]; P=0.02) but other hospital factors were not. Conclusions: Hospitals admitting higher percentages of TIA patients and having higher emergency physician staffing have greater performance on select guideline-concordant process measures for TIA. Higher emergency physician staffing was associated with improved outcomes 90 days after TIA.


Assuntos
Hospitalização , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/epidemiologia , AVC Isquêmico/epidemiologia , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Serviços de Saúde para Veteranos Militares/normas , Veteranos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/tendências , Feminino , Número de Leitos em Hospital/normas , Hospitalização/tendências , Humanos , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/diagnóstico , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/terapia , AVC Isquêmico/diagnóstico , AVC Isquêmico/terapia , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
2.
BMC Nephrol ; 20(1): 190, 2019 05 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31138156

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant (KT) patients presenting with cardiovascular (CVD) events are being managed increasingly in non-transplant facilities. We aimed to identify drivers of mortality and costs, including transplant hospital status. METHODS: Data from the 2009-2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample, the American Hospital Association, and Hospital Compare were used to evaluate post-KT patients hospitalized for MI, CHF, stroke, cardiac arrest, dysrhythmia, and malignant hypertension. We used generalized estimating equations to identify clinical, structural, and process factors associated with risk-adjusted mortality and high cost hospitalization (HCH). RESULTS: Data on 7803 admissions were abstracted from 275 hospitals. Transplant hospitals had lower crude mortality (3.0% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.06), and higher un-adjusted total episodic costs (Median $33,271 vs. $28,022, p < 0.0001). After risk-adjusting for clinical, structural, and process factors, mortality predictors included: age, CVD burden, CV destination hospital, diagnostic cardiac catheterization without intervention (all, p < 0.001). Female sex, race, documented co-morbidities, and hospital teaching status were protective (all, p < 0.05). Transplant and non-transplant hospitals had similar risk-adjusted mortality. HCH was associated with: age, CVD burden, CV procedures, and staffing patterns. Hospitalizations at transplant facilities had 37% lower risk-adjusted odds of HCH. Cardiovascular process measures were not associated with adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: KT patients presenting with CVD events had similar risk-adjusted mortality at transplant and non-transplant hospitals, but high cost care was less likely in transplant hospitals. Transplant hospitals may provide better value in cardiovascular care for transplant patients. These data have significant implications for patients, transplant and non-transplant providers, and payers.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Hospitais/tendências , Transplante de Rim/mortalidade , Transplante de Rim/tendências , Alta do Paciente/tendências , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Idoso , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/economia , Bases de Dados Factuais/economia , Bases de Dados Factuais/tendências , Economia Hospitalar/tendências , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Transplante de Rim/economia , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente/economia , Vigilância da População/métodos , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 30(2): 250-256.e1, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30717959

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the statewide variability in the role of different specialties in lower extremity endovascular revascularization (LEER) and associated submitted charges of care and actual reimbursement for Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: The 2015 "Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data: Physician and Other Supplier" data includes provider-specific information regarding the type of service, submitted average charges of care, and actual average Medicare reimbursements per Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) code per provider. All HCPCS codes related to LEER were identified. The role of vascular surgery (VS), interventional cardiology (IC), and interventional radiology (IR) in each HCPCS-specific intervention was investigated. RESULTS: In 2015, 4113 providers submitted claims for iliac (n = 13,659), femoropopliteal (n = 52,344), and tibioperoneal (n = 32,688) endovascular revascularizations. In the facility setting, VS performed most of these procedures (52%), followed by IC (32%) and IR (8%). In the outpatient-based lab setting, the proportions were 46%, 36%, and 13%, respectively. Substantial statewide variability in the role of different specialties in LEER was noted. In Maine, Vermont, and Hawaii, all facility claims were submitted by VS, while more than 70% of the claims in Arizona and Utah were submitted by IC. The highest share of LEER for IR was observed in Montana and North Dakota (50%). There was substantial statewide variability in the submitted charges. CONCLUSION: Currently, less than 10% of LEER procedures are being performed by IR. The statewide variability in the submitted charges of care by providers and actual reimbursement for Medicare beneficiaries were investigated in this study.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Endovasculares/tendências , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Benefícios do Seguro/tendências , Extremidade Inferior/irrigação sanguínea , Medicare/tendências , Doença Arterial Periférica/cirurgia , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Especialização/tendências , Cardiologistas/tendências , Procedimentos Endovasculares/economia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Humanos , Benefícios do Seguro/economia , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/tendências , Medicare/economia , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença Arterial Periférica/economia , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Radiologistas/tendências , Especialização/economia , Cirurgiões/tendências , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos
4.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 28(5): 1243-1251, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30745230

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To explore a 5-year comparison of disparities in intravenous t-PA (IV t-PA) use among acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients based on race, gender, age, ethnic origin, hospital status, and geographic location. METHODS: We extracted patients' demographic information and hospital characteristics for 2010 and 2014 from the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS). We compared disparities in IV t-PA use among AIS patients in 2010 to that in 2014 to estimate temporal trends. Multiple logistic regression was performed to compare disparities based on demographic variables, hospital designation, and geographic location. RESULTS: Overall, there was approximately a 2% increase in IV t-PA from 2010 to 2014. Blacks were 15% less likely to receive IV t-PA compared to Whites in 2014, but in 2010, there was no difference. Patients aged 62-73 had lower odds of receiving IV t-PA than age group ≤61 in both 2010 and 2014. Designated stroke centers in the Lower New York State region were associated with reduced odds of IV t-PA use in 2010 while those located in the Upper New York State region were associated with increased odds of IV t-PA use in both 2010 and 2014, compared to their respective nondesignated counterparts. Gender, ethnic origin, and insurance status were not associated with IV t-PA utilization in both 2010 and 2014. CONCLUSION: Overall IV t-PA utilization among AIS patients increased between 2010 and 2014. However, there are evident disparities in IV t-PA use based on patient's race, age, hospital geography, and stroke designation status.


Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrinolíticos/administração & dosagem , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia Trombolítica/tendências , Administração Intravenosa , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Encefálica/etnologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New York/epidemiologia , Grupos Raciais , Fatores Sexuais , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etnologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 54: 123-133, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29778610

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to characterize utilization and outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (TEVAR) in New York State during the first decade of commercial availability, with respect to evolving indications, results, and costs. Of specific interest was evaluation of the volume-outcome relationship for this relatively uncommon procedure. METHODS: The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was queried to identify patients undergoing TEVAR from 2005 to 2014 for aortic dissection (AD), non-ruptured aneurysm (NRA), and ruptured aneurysm (RA). Outcomes assessed included in-hospital mortality, complications, and costs. Linkage to the National Provider Identifier and New York Office of Professions databases facilitated comparisons by surgeon and facility volume. RESULTS: One thousand eight hundred thirty-eight patients were identified: 334 AD, 226 RA, and 1,278 NRA. Since introduction, TEVAR implantation increased significantly over the 10-year period in all groups (P < 0.01), with recent increase in utilization for AD. Increased in-hospital mortality correlated with RA (OR 5.52 [3.02-10.08], P < 0.01), coagulopathy (3.38 [2.02-5.66], P < 0.01), cerebrovascular disease (2.47 [1.17-5.22], P = 0.02), and nonwhite/nonblack race (1.74 [1.08-2.82], P = 0.02). Early in the experience (2005-2007), patients were more likely to be treated at high-volume facilities (>17 per year) and by high-volume surgeons (>5 per year), (P < 0.01). Since 2011, however, most patients (53%) have undergone TEVAR by low-volume surgeons (<3 per year). Neither surgeon nor hospital volume was associated with clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Since the introduction of TEVAR, comparable results have been obtained across hospital and surgeon volume strata. Favorable outcomes, even in low-volume settings, underscore the complexity of volume-outcome relationships in high-acuity procedures. These findings have implications for credentialing, regionalization, and future dissemination of advanced endovascular technology.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/cirurgia , Dissecção Aórtica/cirurgia , Ruptura Aórtica/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/tendências , Procedimentos Endovasculares/tendências , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Dissecção Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Dissecção Aórtica/economia , Dissecção Aórtica/mortalidade , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/economia , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/mortalidade , Ruptura Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Ruptura Aórtica/economia , Ruptura Aórtica/mortalidade , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/economia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/mortalidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Difusão de Inovações , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/economia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/tendências , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New York , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 54: 40-47.e1, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30217701

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cost-effectiveness in healthcare is being increasingly scrutinized. Data regarding claims variability for vascular operations are lacking. Herein, we aim to describe variability in charges and payments for aortoiliac (AI) and infrainguinal (II) revascularizations. METHODS: We analyzed 2012-2014 claims data from a statewide claims database for procedures grouped by Current Procedural Terminology codes into II-open (II-O), II-endovascular (II-E), AI-open (AI-O), and AI-endovascular interventions (AI-E). We compared charges and payments in urban (≥50,000 people, UAs) versus rural areas (<50,000 people, RAs). Amounts are reported in $US as median with interquartile range. Cost-to-charge ratios (CCRs) as a measure of reimbursement were calculated as the percentage of the charges covered by the payments. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were performed to determine significant differences. RESULTS: A total of 5,239 persons had complete claims data. There were 7,239 UA and 6,891 RA claims, and 1,057 AI claims (AI-E = 879, AI-O = 178) and 4,182 II claims (II-E = 3,012, II-0 = 1,170). Median charges were $5,357 for AI [$1,846-$27,107] and $2,955 for II [$1,484-$9,338.5] (P < 0.0001). Median plan payment was $454 for AI [$0-$1,380] and $454 for II [$54-$1,060] (P = 0.67). For AI and II, charges were significantly higher for UA than RA (AI: UA $9,875 [$2,489-$34,427], RA $3,732 [$1,450-$20,595], P < 0.0001; II: UA $3,596 [$1,700-$21,664], RA $2,534 [$1,298-$6,169], P < 0.0001). AI-E charges were higher than AI-O (AI-E $7,960 [$1,699-$32,507], AI-O $4,774 [$2,636-$7,147], P < 0.0001), but AI-O payments were higher (AI-E $424 [$0-$1,270], AI-O $869 [$164-$1,435], P = 0.0067). II-E charges were higher (II-E $2,994 [$1,552-$22,164], II-O $2,873 [$1,108-$5,345], P < 0.0001), but II-O payments were higher (II-E $427 [$50-$907], II-O $596 [$73-$1,299], P < 0.0001). CCRs were highest for II operations and UAs. CONCLUSIONS: Wide variability in claim charges and payments exists for vascular operations. AI procedures had higher charges than II, without any difference in payments. UA charged more than RA for both AI and II operations, but RA had higher payments and CCRs. Endovascular procedures had higher charges, while open procedures had higher payments. Charge differences may be related to endovascular device costs, and further research is necessary to determine the reasons behind consistent claims variability between UA and RA.


Assuntos
Demandas Administrativas em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Preços Hospitalares , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/economia , Demandas Administrativas em Assistência à Saúde/classificação , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colorado , Análise Custo-Benefício , Current Procedural Terminology , Bases de Dados Factuais , Procedimentos Endovasculares/classificação , Procedimentos Endovasculares/tendências , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Preços Hospitalares/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Mecanismo de Reembolso/tendências , Serviços de Saúde Rural/economia , Fatores de Tempo , Serviços Urbanos de Saúde/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/classificação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/tendências
7.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 54: 48-53, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30213742

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was signed into law in 2010 and enacted in 2013 which improved insurance coverage across America due to increasing Medicaid eligibility as well as changes to individual insurance markets. In Arkansas, this was implemented by a Medicaid expansion waiver which allowed patients to purchase insurance with funds provided by the government to subsidize premiums through the marketplace. The goal of this study was to determine the effects of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on Arkansas patients with peripheral arterial disease. METHODS: A pre-post research design using the Arkansas Hospital Discharge Dataset was used to study the impact of the ACA on limb amputation, distal bypass, discharge disposition, and total costs for patients diagnosed with peripheral arterial disease/atherosclerosis. The data were obtained for the years 2007 through 2009 (pre-ACA), 2011 through 2013 (post-ACA), and 2014 through 2015 (post-Arkansas expansion). Bivariate analysis, analysis of variance, and regression analyses were performed to analyze the data. RESULTS: A total of 10,923 patients were identified. Uninsured patients ("self-pay") decreased from 7% pre-ACA to 3.4% post-Arkansas expansion (P < 0.0001). There was a decrease in adjusted health-care costs after the Arkansas expansion (P < 0.0001). There was no change in mortality or transfer to rehabilitation facilities, but there was an increase in discharge to skilled nursing facilities along with a decrease in patients being discharged home (P < 0.0001). Regression analysis showed private insurance to be associated with a 49% reduction in the odds of an amputation (P < 0.0001). The Arkansas expansion was associated with a 26% reduction in the odds of an amputation when compared with that before the ACA implementation (P < 0.005). Having private insurance was associated with a 26% increase in the odds of having a bypass when compared with uninsured patients (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with private insurance have a decreased chance of amputation and increased odds of having a bypass when compared with patients who were of the self-pay category. The increase in private insurance coverage in our patient population could improve the rate of amputation in the vascular population in Arkansas by increasing early interventions for peripheral vascular disease.


Assuntos
Amputação Cirúrgica/tendências , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/tendências , Doença Arterial Periférica/cirurgia , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/tendências , Amputação Cirúrgica/legislação & jurisprudência , Arkansas/epidemiologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/legislação & jurisprudência , Cobertura do Seguro/tendências , Salvamento de Membro/legislação & jurisprudência , Salvamento de Membro/tendências , Masculino , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/legislação & jurisprudência , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Doença Arterial Periférica/epidemiologia , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/legislação & jurisprudência
8.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 28(2): 295-304, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30389376

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Little is known about how hospitals are connected in the transfer of ischemic stroke (IS) patients. We aimed to describe differences in characteristics of transferred versus nontransferred patients and between transferring and receiving hospitals in the Northeastern United States, and to describe changes over time. METHODS: We used Medicare claims data, and a subset linked with the Get with the Guidelines-Stroke registry from 2007 to 2011. Receiving hospitals were those with annual IS volume greater than or equal to 120 and greater than or equal to 15% received as transfers, and transferring hospitals were nonaccepting hospitals that transferred greater than or equal to 15% of their total (ED plus inpatient) IS patient discharges. A transferring-to-receiving hospital connection was identified if greater than or equal to 5 patients per year were shared. ArcGIS 10.3.1 was used for network visualization. RESULTS: Among 177,270 admissions to 402 Northeast hospitals, 6906 (3.9%) patients were transferred. Transferred patients were younger with more severe strokes (78 versus 81 years, P < .001; National Institutes of Health Stroke Severity 7 versus 5, P < .001), and were as likely to receive tissue plasminogen activator as nontransferred (P = .29). From 2007 to 2011, there were more patients transferred (960 [3%] to 1777 [6%], P < .001), and more transferring hospitals (46 [12%] to 91 [24%], P < .001), and receiving hospitals (6 [2%] to 16 [4%], P < .001). Most transferring hospitals were exclusively connected to a single receiving hospital. CONCLUSIONS: From 2007 to 2011, hospitals in the United States Northeast became more connected in the care of IS patients, with increasing patient transfers and hospital connections. Yet most hospitals remained unconnected. Further characterization of this transfer network will be important for understanding and improving regional stroke systems of care.


Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Transferência de Pacientes/tendências , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Regionalização da Saúde/organização & administração , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , New England/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
BMC Nephrol ; 19(1): 186, 2018 07 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30064380

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Both dialysis facilities and hospitals are accountable for 30-day hospital readmissions among U.S. hemodialysis patients. We examined the association of post-hospitalization processes of care at hemodialysis facilities with pulmonary edema-related and other readmissions. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort comprised of electronic medical record (EMR) data linked with national registry data, we identified unique patient index admissions (n = 1056; 2/1/10-7/31/15) that were followed by ≥3 in-center hemodialysis sessions within 10 days, among patients treated at 19 Southeastern dialysis facilities. Indicators of processes of care were defined as present vs. absent in the dialysis facility EMR. Readmissions were defined as admissions within 30 days of the index discharge; pulmonary edema-related vs. other readmissions defined by discharge codes for pulmonary edema, fluid overload, and/or congestive heart failure. Multinomial logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for pulmonary edema-related and other vs. no readmissions. RESULTS: Overall, 17.7% of patients were readmitted, and 8.0% had pulmonary edema-related readmissions (44.9% of all readmissions). Documentation of the index admission (OR = 2.03, 95% CI 1.07-3.85), congestive heart failure (OR = 1.87, 95% CI 1.07-3.27), and home medications stopped (OR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.08-3.05) or changed (OR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.06-2.70) in the EMR post-hospitalization were all associated with higher risk of pulmonary edema-related vs. no readmission; lower post-dialysis weight (by ≥0.5 kg) after vs. before hospitalization was associated with 40% lower risk (OR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.37-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that some interventions performed at the dialysis facility in the post-hospitalization period may be associated with reduced readmission risk, while others may provide a potential existing means of identifying patients at higher risk for readmissions, to whom such interventions could be efficiently targeted.


Assuntos
Unidades Hospitalares de Hemodiálise/tendências , Hospitalização/tendências , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Readmissão do Paciente/tendências , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Diálise Renal/tendências , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Diálise Renal/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos
10.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 56(3): 349-355, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30042040

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to analyse early and late outcomes in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for acute or subacute non-traumatic type B aortic dissection (TBAD), with the particular aims of identifying prognostic morphological predictors, and to assess the magnitude of the impact of the timing of TEVAR. METHODS: This was a retrospective, two centre, population based consecutive case series. The study group consisted of all the 53 patients undergoing TEVAR for complicated TBAD in Stockholm during the 12 year period 2004-2015. Demographic data, risk factors, operative, and outcome variables were registered and analysed. The CT scans were thoroughly retrospectively examined. RESULTS: Nearly half (24 patients; 45%) underwent TEVAR within 48 h of the onset of the initial symptoms, another 20 within 2 weeks, and nine in the subacute phase (15-90 days). The median age was 63 years (range 32-88) and 20 patients (38%) were women. The 30 day mortality was 17% (nine patients). Eight of these nine patients were treated within the first 48 h; urgent intervention (0-48 h) was associated with increased mortality (crude OR 14.0; 95% CI 1.6-122). All the nine patients had a false lumen area (FLA) at the level of the tracheal bifurcation exceeding 50% of the aortic cross sectional area at that segment, a finding significantly associated with increased mortality (p = .04), with a 25% 30 day mortality if the FLA > 50% (n = 36) at that segment, but 0% if the FLA was <50%. Overall the one year survival was 79% and five year survival 65%. CONCLUSIONS: All the early deaths demonstrated a FLA >50% of the total aortic cross sectional area at the level of the tracheal bifurcation. Patients needing urgent TEVAR had markedly worse outcome. The first finding may become an additional tool for future risk stratification.


Assuntos
Aneurisma Aórtico/cirurgia , Dissecção Aórtica/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/tendências , Procedimentos Endovasculares/tendências , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Tempo para o Tratamento/tendências , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Dissecção Aórtica/diagnóstico , Dissecção Aórtica/mortalidade , Aneurisma Aórtico/diagnóstico , Aneurisma Aórtico/mortalidade , Aortografia/métodos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/mortalidade , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Suécia/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 56(3): 391-399, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29859821

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To study international differences in incidence and practice patterns as well as time trends in lower limb amputations related to peripheral arterial disease and/or diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Data on lower limb amputations during 2010-2014 were collected from population based administrative data from countries in Europe and Australasia participating in the VASCUNET collaboration. Amputation rates, time trends, in hospital or 30 day mortality and reimbursement systems were analysed. RESULTS: Data from 12 countries covering 259 million inhabitants in 2014 were included. Individuals aged ≥ 65 years ranged from 12.9% (Slovakia) to 20.7% (Germany) and diabetes prevalence among amputees from 25.7% (Finland) to 74.3% (Slovakia). The mean incidence of major amputation varied between 7.2/100,000 (New Zealand) and 41.4/100,000 (Hungary), with an overall declining time trend with the exception of Slovakia, while minor amputations increased over time. The older age group (≥65 years) was up to 4.9 times more likely to be amputated compared with those younger than 65 years. Reported mortality rates were lowest in Finland (6.3%) and highest in Hungary (20.3%). Countries with a fee for service reimbursement system had a lower incidence of major amputation compared with countries with a population based reimbursement system (14.3/100,000 versus 18.4/100,000, respectively, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This international audit showed large geographical differences in major amputation rates, by a factor of almost six, and an overall declining time trend during the 4 year observation of this study. Diabetes prevalence, age distribution, and mortality rates were also found to vary between countries. Despite limitations attributable to registry data, these findings are important, and warrant further research on how to improve limb salvage in different demographic settings.


Assuntos
Amputação Cirúrgica/tendências , Doença Arterial Periférica/cirurgia , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Cirurgiões/tendências , Idoso , Amputação Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Amputação Cirúrgica/mortalidade , Austrália/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Auditoria Médica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nova Zelândia/epidemiologia , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Doença Arterial Periférica/mortalidade , Prevalência , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
12.
Vasc Med ; 23(4): 365-371, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29781388

RESUMO

Variation in the use of inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) across hospitals has been observed, suggesting differences in quality of care. Hospitalization metrics associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients have not been compared based on IVCF utilization rates using a national sample. We conducted a descriptive retrospective study using the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) to delineate the variability of hospitalization metrics across the hospital quartiles of IVCF utilization for VTE patients. The NRD included all-payer administrative inpatient records drawn from 22 states. Adult (≥ 18 years) patients with VTE hospitalizations with or without IVCF were identified from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2014 and hospitals were divided into quartiles based on the IVCF utilization rate as a proportion of VTE patients. Primary outcome measures were observed rates of in-hospital mortality, 30-day all-cause readmissions and VTE-related readmissions, cost, and length of stay. Patient case-mix characteristics and hospital-level factors by hospital quartiles of IVCF utilization rates, were compared. Overall, 12.29% of VTE patients had IVCF placement, with IVCF utilization ranging from 0% to 46.84%. The highest quartile had fewer pulmonary embolism patients relative to deep vein thrombosis patients, and older patient ages were present in higher quartiles. The highest quartile of hospitals placing IVCFs were more often private, for-profit, and non-teaching. Patient and hospital characteristics and hospitalization metrics varied by IVCF utilization rates, but hospitalization outcomes for non-IVCF patients varied most between quartiles. Future work investigating the implications of IVCF utilization rates as a measure of quality of care for VTE patients is needed.


Assuntos
Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/tendências , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Implantação de Prótese/instrumentação , Implantação de Prótese/tendências , Filtros de Veia Cava/tendências , Tromboembolia Venosa/terapia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/normas , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/normas , Humanos , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Implantação de Prótese/normas , Implantação de Prótese/estatística & dados numéricos , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Filtros de Veia Cava/normas , Filtros de Veia Cava/estatística & dados numéricos , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia
13.
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 30(3): 350-359, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29549015

RESUMO

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery may be associated with less morbidity than open lobectomy or segmentectomy, but some studies have questioned the benefit of thoracoscopic surgery. This study aimed to determine trends and factors associated with patient's likelihood of undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy or segmentectomy and to compare outcomes with each approach. This retrospective study included adult patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy or segmentectomy from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project from 2007 to 2015 (n = 14,717). Logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the association of patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and surgeon specialty with thoracoscopic lobectomy or segmentectomy. Propensity score matching was performed to evaluate outcomes for thoracoscopic and open lobectomy or segmentectomy. Use of thoracoscopic lobectomy or segmentectomy increased from 11.6% in 2007 to 60.6% in 2015 (P< 0.0001). Older patients, females, and Hispanics were more likely to undergo thoracoscopic lobectomy, whereas morbidly obese patients, patients with higher American Society of Anesthesiology class, and patients with 4-6 frailty conditions had a lower likelihood of receiving thoracoscopic lobectomy or segmentectomy. Thoracic surgeons had 57% (odds ratio 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.36-1.81) higher odds of performing thoracoscopic surgery than other surgeons. Thoracoscopic lobectomy or segmentectomy reduced risk of 30-day mortality (1.0% vs 1.9%; odds ratio 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.37-0.70) and resulted in shorter length of stay (4 days vs 6 days; Beta coefficient = -0.37, P < 0.0001), and fewer complications. The frequency of thoracoscopic lobectomy or segmentectomy has increased substantially over the last 10 years and now accounts for over half of lobectomies. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery showed better outcomes than open lobectomy or segmentectomy.


Assuntos
Pneumonectomia/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Melhoria de Qualidade/tendências , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Cirurgia Torácica Vídeoassistida/tendências , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Comorbidade , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonectomia/efeitos adversos , Pneumonectomia/mortalidade , Pneumonectomia/normas , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Cirurgia Torácica Vídeoassistida/efeitos adversos , Cirurgia Torácica Vídeoassistida/mortalidade , Cirurgia Torácica Vídeoassistida/normas , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
14.
Clin Cardiol ; 41(6): 758-768, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29521450

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sex-based differences in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) mortality may attenuate with age due to better symptom recognition and prompt care. HYPOTHESIS: Age is a modifier of temporal trends in sex-based differences in ACS care. METHODS: Among 104 817 eligible patients with ACS enrolled in the AHA Get With the Guidelines-Coronary Artery Disease registry between 2003 and 2008, care and in-hospital mortality were evaluated stratified by sex and age. Temporal trends within sex and age groups were assessed for 2 care processes: percentage of STEMI patients presenting to PCI-capable hospitals with a DTB time ≤ 90 minutes (DTB90) and proportion of eligible ACS patients receiving aspirin within 24 hours. RESULTS: After adjustment for clinical risk factors and sociodemographic and hospital characteristics, 2276 (51.7%) women and 6276 (56.9%) men with STEMI were treated with DTB90 (adjusted OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.80-0.91, P < 0.0001 for women vs men). Time trend analysis showed an absolute increase ranging from 24% to 35% in DTB90 rates among both men and women (P for trend <0.0001 for each group), with consistent differences over time across the 4 age/sex groups (3-way P-interaction = 0.93). Despite high rate of baseline aspirin use (87%-91%), there was a 9% to 11% absolute increase in aspirin use over time, also with consistent differences across the 4 age/sex groups (all 3-way P-interaction ≥0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Substantial gains of generally similar magnitude existed in ACS performance measures over 6 years of study across sex and age groups; areas for improvement remain, particularly among younger women.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/tendências , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/tendências , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/mortalidade , Fatores Etários , Idoso , American Heart Association , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/mortalidade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Prospectivos , Melhoria de Qualidade/tendências , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/mortalidade , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores de Tempo , Tempo para o Tratamento/tendências , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
15.
J Vasc Access ; 19(6): 569-572, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29575978

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION:: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services have determined that chronic dialysis units should have <12% of their patients utilizing central venous catheters for hemodialysis treatments. On the Eastern Shore of Maryland, the central venous catheter rates in the dialysis units averaged >45%. A multidisciplinary program was established with goals of decreasing catheter rates in order to decrease central line-associated bloodstream infections, decrease mortality associated with central line-associated bloodstream infection, decrease hospital days, and provide savings to the healthcare system. METHODS:: We collected the catheter rates within three dialysis centers served over a 5-year period. Using published data surrounding the incidence and related costs of central line-associated bloodstream infection and mortality per catheter day, the number of central line-associated bloodstream infection events, the costs, and the related mortality could be determined prior to and after the initiation of the dialysis access program. RESULTS:: An organized dialysis access program resulted in a 82% decrease in the number of central venous catheter days which lead to a concurrent reduction in central line-associated bloodstream infection and deaths. As a result of creating an access program, central venous catheter rates decreased from an average rate of 45% to 8%. The cost savings related to the program was calculated to be over US$5 million. The decrease in the number of mortalities is estimated to be between 13 and 27 patients. CONCLUSION:: We conclude that a formalized access program decreases catheter rates, central line-associated bloodstream infection, and the resultant hospitalizations, mortality, and costs. Areas with high hemodialysis catheter rates should develop access programs to better serve their patient population.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Diálise Renal/tendências , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/mortalidade , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentação , Cateterismo Venoso Central/mortalidade , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Cateteres de Demora/tendências , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/tendências , Humanos , Incidência , Maryland/epidemiologia , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Diálise Renal/instrumentação , Diálise Renal/mortalidade , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 50: 46-51, 2018 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29477682

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The accepted treatment for acute limb ischemia (ALI) is immediate systemic anticoagulation and timely reperfusion to restore blood flow. In this study, we describe the retrospective assessment of pretransfer management decisions by referring hospitals to an academic tertiary care facility and its impact on perioperative adverse events. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of ALI patients transferred to us via our Level I Vascular Emergency Program from 2010 to 2013 was performed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, Rutherford ischemia classification, time to anticoagulation, and time to reperfusion were tabulated and analyzed for correlation to incidence of major adverse limb events (MALEs), mortality, and bypass patency in the perioperative period (30-day postoperative). All intervals were calculated from the onset of symptoms and categorized into 3 subcohorts (<6 hr, 6-48 hr, and >48 hr). RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients with an average age of 64.0 (±16.2) years presented to outlying hospitals and were transferred to us with lower extremity ALI. The mean delay from symptom onset to initial referring physician evaluation was 18.3 hr. At that time of evaluation, 53.8% had Rutherford class IIA ischemia and 36.3% had class IIB ischemia. Seventy-six patients (87.4%) were started on heparin previous to transfer. However, only 44 patients (57.9%) reached therapeutic levels as measured by activated partial thromboplastin time before definitive revascularization. A delay of anticoagulation initiation >48 hr from symptom onset was associated with increased 30-day reintervention rates compared with the <6 hr group (66.7% vs. 23.5%; P < 0.05). However, time to reperfusion had no statistically significant impact on MALE, 30-day mortality, or 30-day interventional patency in our small cohorts. Additionally, patients with a previous revascularization had a higher 30-day reintervention rate (46.5%; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The practice of timely therapeutic anticoagulation of patients referred for ALI from community facilities occurs less frequently than expected and is associated with an increased perioperative reintervention rate.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Procedimentos Endovasculares/tendências , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/tendências , Hospitais Comunitários/tendências , Isquemia/terapia , Transferência de Pacientes/tendências , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Doença Aguda , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Isquemia/mortalidade , Isquemia/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Doença Arterial Periférica/mortalidade , Doença Arterial Periférica/fisiopatologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Fatores de Tempo , Tempo para o Tratamento/tendências , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular
17.
Circulation ; 137(18): 1899-1908, 2018 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29305529

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation is strongly recommended after myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass surgery, but it is historically underused. We sought to evaluate variation in cardiac rehabilitation participation across the United States. METHODS: From administrative data from the Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system and a 5% Medicare sample, we used International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision codes to identify patients hospitalized for myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass surgery from 2007 to 2011. After excluding patients who died in ≤30 days of hospitalization, we calculated the percentage of patients who participated in ≥1 outpatient visits for cardiac rehabilitation during the 12 months after hospitalization. We estimated adjusted and standardized rates of participation in cardiac rehabilitation by state using hierarchical logistic regression models. RESULTS: Overall, participation in cardiac rehabilitation was 16.3% (23 403/143 756) in Medicare and 10.3% (9123/88 826) in VA. However, participation rates varied widely across states, ranging from 3.2% to 41.8% in Medicare and 1.2% to 47.6% in VA. Similar regional variation was observed in both populations. Patients in the West North Central region (Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota) had the highest participation, whereas those in the Pacific region (Alaska, California, Hawaii, Oregon, and Washington) had the lowest participation in both Medicare (33.7% versus 10.6%) and VA (16.6% versus 5.1%) populations. Significant hospital-level variation was also present, with participation ranging from 3% to 75% in Medicare and 1% to 43% in VA. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac rehabilitation participation remains low overall in both Medicare and VA populations. However, remarkably similar regional variation exists, with some regions and hospitals achieving high rates of participation in both populations. This provides an opportunity to identify best practices from higher performing hospitals and regions that could be used to improve cardiac rehabilitation participation in lower performing hospitals and regions.


Assuntos
Reabilitação Cardíaca/tendências , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Cardiopatias/reabilitação , Medicare , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Melhoria de Qualidade/tendências , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Demandas Administrativas em Assistência à Saúde , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Cardiopatias/diagnóstico , Cardiopatias/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
18.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 23(5): 469-475, 2018 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28240802

RESUMO

AIM: Commencement of haemodialysis with an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or arteriovenous graft (AVG) is associated with improved survival compared with commencement with a central venous catheter. In 2011-2012, Queensland Health made incentive payments to renal units for early referred patients who commenced peritoneal dialysis (PD), or haemodialysis with an AVF/AVG. The aim of this study was to determine if pay for performance improved clinical care. METHODS: All patients who commenced dialysis in Australia between 2009 and 2014 and were registered with the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA) were included. A multivariable regression model was used to compare rates of commencing dialysis with a PD catheter or permanent AVF/AVG during the pay-for-performance period (2011-2012) with periods prior (2009-2010) and after (2013-2014). RESULTS: A total of 10 858 early referred patients commenced dialysis during the study period, including 2058 in Queensland. In Queensland, PD as first modality increased with time (P < 0.001) but there was no change in AVF/AVG rate at first haemodialysis (P = 0.5). In a multivariate model using the pay-for-performance period as reference, the odds ratio for commencement with PD or haemodialysis with an AVF/AVG in Queensland was 1.02 (95% CI 0.81-1.29) in 2009-2010 and 1.28 (95% CI 1.01-1.61) in 2013-2014. There was no change for the rest of Australia (0.97 95% CI 0.87-1.09 in 2009-2010 and 1.00 95% CI 0.90-1.11 in 2013-14). CONCLUSION: Pay for performance did not improve rates of commencement of dialysis with PD or an AVF/AVG during the payment period. A lag effect on clinical care may explain the improvement in later years.


Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/economia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/economia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/economia , Diálise Peritoneal/economia , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Melhoria de Qualidade/economia , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Reembolso de Incentivo/economia , Diálise Renal/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/tendências , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/tendências , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/tendências , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Diálise Peritoneal/efeitos adversos , Diálise Peritoneal/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Melhoria de Qualidade/tendências , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Queensland , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Reembolso de Incentivo/tendências , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Diálise Renal/tendências , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
19.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 46: 36-42, 2018 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28890064

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The lack of evidence-based guidelines on the use of prophylactic inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) in patients after trauma has led to variation of its application. We seek to understand the national trend of the use of prophylactic IVCF in trauma population. METHODS: A retrospective review of the National Trauma Databank (2002-2014) was performed to identify patients who received an IVCF after trauma. Those without a preexisting venous thromboembolism or discharge diagnosis of VTE were classified as receiving prophylactic IVCF. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine associations between the use of prophylactic IVCF and risk factors for VTE. P value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Among the 2,189,994 patients evaluated, 41,155 (2%) received a prophylactic IVCF. The rate of overall IVCF placement (2.9% in 2002-2006 to 1.6% in 2014, P < 0.001) and prophylactic IVCF placement (2.5% in 2002-2006 to 1.2% in 2014, P < 0.001) decreased over the study period. In multivariable analysis, significant risk factors associated with the use of prophylactic IVCF were male gender (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.2), African-American race (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.2), injury severity score ≥ 24 (OR 4.4, 95% CI 4.2-4.5), Glasgow Coma Scale <8 (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.4-1.5), spinal cord injury with paraplegia (OR 5.1, 95% CI 4.7-5.6), pelvic fracture (OR 2.9, 95% CI 2.7-3.0), long bone fracture (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.3-1.4), and solid organ injury (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.2-1.3) (P < 0.001). Patients who were treated at a level-II trauma center (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.1-1.2, P < 0.001), at a facility with ≥200 beds (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2-1.4, P < 0.001), and those with medical insurance coverage (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.6-1.8, P < 0.001) were also more likely to receive a prophylactic IVCF. CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of prophylactic IVCF in trauma patients has decreased over time between 2008 and 2014. Considerable variation exists in its use, which is not fully accounted for by the VTE rate. Further study is required to evaluate appropriate indications for placement of prophylactic IVCF in trauma patients.


Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Implantação de Prótese/instrumentação , Implantação de Prótese/estatística & dados numéricos , Filtros de Veia Cava/estatística & dados numéricos , Veia Cava Inferior , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Implantação de Prótese/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/diagnóstico , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia
20.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 46: 65-74.e1, 2018 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28887240

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As high healthcare costs are increasing scrutinized, a movement toward reducing patient hospital admissions and lengths of stay has emerged, particularly for operations that may be performed safely in the outpatient setting. Our aim is to describe recent temporal trends in the proportion of dialysis access procedures performed on an inpatient versus outpatient basis and to determine the effects of these changes on perioperative morbidity and mortality. METHODS: The 2005-2008 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for all primary arteriovenous fistula (AVF) procedures using current procedural terminology codes. Changes in the proportions of inpatient versus outpatient operations performed by year, as well as the associated 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality, were analyzed using univariable statistics and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Two thousand nine hundred fifty AVF procedures were performed over the study period. Overall, 71.7% (n = 2,114) were performed on an outpatient basis. Inpatient procedures were associated with higher 30-day morbidity (10.5% vs. 4.5%) and mortality (2.8% vs. 0.7%) than outpatient procedures (both, P < 0.001). There was a significant increase in the proportion of procedures performed on an outpatient basis over time (2005: 56% vs. 2008: 75%; P < 0.001). There were no changes in postoperative morbidity or mortality for inpatient or outpatient AVF over time (P ≥ 0.36). Independent determinants of having an inpatient procedure included younger age (OR 0.99), increasing ASA class (ASA IV OR 1.56), congestive heart failure (OR 3.32), recent ascites (OR 3.25), poor functional status (OR 3.22), the presence of an open wound (OR 1.91), and recent sepsis (OR 6.06) (all, P < 0.01). Acute renal failure (OR 2.60) and current dialysis (OR 1.44) were also predictive (P < 0.001). After correcting for baseline differences between groups, the adjusted OR for both morbidity (aOR 1.93, 95% CI 1.38-2.69) and mortality (aOR 2.85, 95% CI 1.36-5.95) remained significantly higher for inpatient versus outpatient AVF. CONCLUSIONS: Dialysis access operations are increasingly being performed on an outpatient basis, with stable perioperative outcomes. Inpatient procedures are associated with worse outcomes, likely because they are reserved for patients with acute illnesses, serious comorbidities, and poor functional status. Overall, for appropriately selected patients, the movement toward performing more elective dialysis access operations on an outpatient basis is associated with acceptable outcomes.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/tendências , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/tendências , Admissão do Paciente/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Diálise Renal/tendências , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/mortalidade , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/mortalidade , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Diálise Renal/mortalidade , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA