Quality Control in the Corneal Bank with Artificial Intelligence: Comparison of a New Deep Learning-based Approach with Conventional Endothelial Cell Counting by the "Rhine-Tec Endothelial Analysis System". / Qualitätskontrolle in der Hornhautbank mit künstlicher Intelligenz: Vergleich eines neuen Deep-Learning-basierten Ansatzes mit der konventionellen Endothelzelldichtenbestimmung durch das "Rhine-Tec Endothelial Analysis System".

Endothelial cell density (ECD) is a crucial parameter for the release of corneal grafts for transplantation. The Lions Eye Bank of Baden-Württemberg uses the "Rhine-Tec Endothelial Analysis System" for ECD quantification, which is based on a fixed counting frame method considering only a small sample of 15 to 40 endothelial cells. The measurement result therefore depends on the frame placement and manual correction of the cells counted within the frame. To increase the sample size and create higher objectivity, we developed a new method based on "deep learning" that automatically detects all visible endothelial cells in the image. This study aims to compare this new method with the conventional Rhine-Tec system. 9375 archived phase-contrast microscopic images of consecutive grafts from the Lions Eye Bank were evaluated with the deep learning method and compared with the corresponding archived analyses of the Rhine-Tec system. Means, Bland-Altman and correlation analyses were compared. Comparable results were obtained for both methods. The mean difference between the Rhine-Tec system and the deep learning method was only - 23 cells/mm2 (95% confidence interval - 29 to - 17). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the two methods, with a correlation coefficient of 0.748. What was striking in the Bland-Altman analysis were clustered deviations in the cell density range between 2000 and 2500 cells/mm2 - with higher values in the Rhine-Tec system. The comparable results for cell density measurement values underline the validity of the deep learning-based method. The deviations around the formal threshold for graft release of 2000 cells/mm2 are most likely explained by the higher objectivity of the deep learning method and the fact that measurement frames and manual corrections were specifically selected to reach the formal threshold of 2000 cells/mm2 when the full area endothelial quality was good. This full area assessment of the graft endothelium cannot currently be replaced by deep learning methods and remains the most important basis for graft release for keratoplasty.

[Analysis of factors affecting the quality of donor corneal endothelial cells].

Objective: To explore the factors influencing the quality of donor corneal endothelium. Methods: A retrospective case series study was conducted. Data from 568 donor corneas obtained from the Shandong Eye Bank between July 1, 2020, and June 30, 2021, were collected for analysis. The corneal endothelium of the donor corneas was observed using corneal endothelial microscopy to assess corneal endothelial cell density (ECD), coefficient of variation, and hexagonal cell ratio (HEX). Relevant factors of corneal donors were collected, including gender, age, cause of death, season of death, time from death to corneal retrieval, and methods of corpse preservation, to investigate their impact on the quality of donor corneal endothelium. The age factor was divided into five age groups: 0-20 years, 21-40 years, 41-60 years, 61-80 years, and >80 years. The time of corneal retrieval was divided into three periods based on the time elapsed since the donor's death: <6 hours, 6-12 hours, and >12 hours. The relationship between these factors and corneal endothelial conditions was analyzed. Results: The 568 donor corneas were obtained from 288 donors, including 225 males (78.13%) and 63 females (21.87%). The mean age was 51.77±18.48 years. The causes of death among donors were as follows: cardiovascular diseases 54.58% (275 individuals), cancer 17.96% (74 individuals), organ failure 14.26% (49 individuals), and accidents 13.20% (64 individuals). The mean time of corneal retrieval after donor death was 140 (76, 400) minutes (ranging from 30 minutes to 45 hours). Among the 145 corneas (25.53%) that had their initial corneal endothelial microscopy examination, the images were not clear, and after thorough rewarming, 106 corneas (18.7%) still had unclear images and could not be analyzed. Among the 462 corneas (81.3%) with clear images, the ECD was (2 602.23±318.40) cells/mm², the coefficient of variation was 36.61%±4.81%, and the HEX was 52.73%±7.15%. The ECD of corneas from older donors was lower compared to younger donors, and the differences between age groups were statistically significant (P<0.001). Corneas from donors who died due to accidents had a higher ECD [(2 829.88±313.90) cells/mm²] compared to those who died from cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and organ failure, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.001). The ECD was highest when corneas were retrieved within 6 hours after death, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). Older donors had higher coefficients of variation but lower HEX values (both P<0.05). Corneas retrieved after a longer time from death had higher coefficients of variation, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference in HEX (P>0.05). Organ failure, cryopreservation, and corneal retrieval time >12 hours were risk factors for unclear corneal endothelial imaging (all P<0.001). Among the 136 corneal endothelial images (23.94%), circular, oval, or band-shaped dark areas were observed, and corneas with dark areas had lower ECD (P<0.05). The longer the time elapsed from death to corneal retrieval, the more dark areas were observed (P<0.001). The presence of dark areas did not affect the coefficient of variation and HEX (P>0.05). Conclusion: Advanced donor age, death due to chronic diseases, longer time elapsed from death to corneal retrieval, and cryopreservation of the body lead to a decrease in the quality of donor corneal endothelium.

Eye banking and keratoplasty trend analysis during the COVID-19 pandemic: A South Indian observational study.

Purpose: To analyze the impact on eye donation and corneal transplantation during the COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary eye hospital in south India. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the donor and recipient records during the study period from January 2020 to May 2021 was conducted and tabulated in Microsoft Excel 2013. Demographic details of the donor, utility rate, cause of death, culture characteristics, storage methods, wet lab usage, and the surgical donor outcomes were evaluated. Additionally, the postoperative workup of the recipients, diagnosis, graft infection and rejection episodes, development of COVID-19 postoperatively, and outcome in terms of visual acuity at one, three, and six months were also noted. Results: A total of 466 eyes from 249 donors were received during the study period. The mean age of the donor population was 62.43 years (20.9). The corneal transplantation utility rate was 36.4% (n = 170). Fifty-one percent of the total transplant surgeries were for therapeutic purposes. This was followed by penetrating optical keratoplasty (34%), Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (9%), and patch grafts (3%). Seventeen (10%) graft rejection episodes were noted and nine (53%) had complete resolution after medical treatment. Conclusion: Proper preventive measures are key to carrying out safe and efficient eye banking activities even during a deadly pandemic, as COVID-19 transmission via transplantation is rare.

Comparative evaluation of four Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft preparation techniques.

OBJECTIVE: To compare subjective and objective outcomes of 4 different Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) peeling techniques performed by novice surgeons at different stages in their surgical career. DESIGN: An ex vivo prospective study. METHODS: In the first round, 2 DMEK peeling techniques were pitched against each other: the peripheral scoring and Sinskey dissection technique with the peripheral scoring and microhoe dissection and the peripheral blunt microhoe dissection against the scleral spurectomy and microhoe dissection. Three surgeons with different operative experience performed the peeling. Outcome measures included graft peeling time, surgeon's peeling difficulty grading (on a scale of 1-10, 1 being the easiest and 10 the hardest), number of radial and circumferential tears before and after trephination, and tissue loss. The 2 techniques that performed the best from the first round proceeded to the final round to identify the best overall technique. RESULTS: In total, 90 tissues (45 pairs) were peeled by 3 surgeons. Following the first-round results, the peripheral scoring and Sinskey dissection and peripheral blunt microhoe dissection proceeded to the final round. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of peeling times, subjective feeling of difficulty, post-trephination tears, and peeling success rates (P > 0.05 for all). However, the peripheral scoring and Sinskey dissection technique had significantly fewer pretrephination radial tears (1.3 ± 1.3 vs 6.1 ± 5.2, P = 0.007) and circumferential tears (0.6 ± 0.9 vs 1.8 ± 2.1, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the learning curve can be overcome quickly with appropriate DMEK peeling techniques. The peripheral scoring and Sinskey dissection peeling technique allows efficient peeling with fewer related tears.

COVID-19 and Eye Banking: Ongoing Impacts of the Pandemic.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of ongoing waves of the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting guidelines on the corneal donor pool with resumption of clinical operations. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of donors deemed eligible for corneal transplantation at an eye bank from July 1, 2020, through December 31, 2021. Donors ineligible due to meeting Eye Bank Association of America (EBAA) COVID-19 guidelines or a positive postmortem COVID-19 testing were examined. The correlation between COVID-19 rule outs and state COVID positivity was calculated. The number of scheduled surgeries, suitable corneas, imports, and international exports was compared with a pre-COVID period. Postmortem testing was reduced for the final 5 months of the study, and numbers were compared before and after the policy change. RESULTS: 2.85% of referrals to the eye bank were ruled out because of EBAA guidelines. 3.2% of postmortem tests were positive or indeterminate resulting in an ineligible tissue donor (0.42% of referrals). Over the 18-month period, there was a 4.30% shortage of suitable corneas compared with transplantation procedures. There was a significant correlation between postmortem testing and state COVID-19 positivity (r = 0.37, P <0.01), but not with EBAA guidelines (r = 0.19, P = 0.07). When postmortem testing was reduced, significantly more corneas were exported internationally. CONCLUSIONS: Although corneal transplant procedures were back to normal levels, there was a shortage of suitable corneal tissue. The discontinuation of postmortem testing was associated with a significant increase in international exports of corneal donor tissue.

Transcriptional Profiling Provides New Insights into Organ Culture-Induced Changes in Human Donor Corneas.

Corneal transplantation is one of the most common forms of tissue transplantation worldwide. Donor corneal tissue used in transplantation is provided by eye banks, which store the tissue in culture medium after procurement. To date, the effects of cell culture on human corneal tissue have not been fully elucidated. Using the 3' RNA sequencing method for massive analysis of cDNA ends (MACE), we show that cultivation of corneal tissue leads to significant changes in a variety of molecular processes in human corneal tissue that go well beyond aspects of previously known culture effects. Functionally grouped network analysis revealed nine major groups of biological processes that were affected by corneal organ culture, among them keratinization, hypoxia, and angiogenesis, with genes from each group being affected by culture time. A cell type deconvolution analysis revealed significant modulations of the corneal immune cell profile in a time dependent manner. The results suggest that current culture conditions should be further refined and that prolonged cultivation may be detrimental. Recently, we showed that MACE enables transcriptional profiling of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) conjunctival tissue with high accuracy even after more than 10 years of storage. Here we demonstrate that MACE provides comparable results for native and FFPE corneal tissue, confirming that the technology is suitable for transcriptome analysis of a wide range of archived diseased corneal samples stored in histological archives. Finally, our data underscore the feasibility of bioinformatics cell-type enrichment analysis in bulk RNA-seq data to profile immune cell composition in fixed and archived corneal tissue samples, for which RNA-seq analysis of individual cells is often not possible.

Glasses-Assisted 3D Display System-Guided Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Tissue Preparation.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) tissue preparation using a glasses-assisted 3-dimensional (3D) display system and to compare it with a conventional surgical microscope. METHODS: Healthy pairs of human corneas suitable for penetrating keratoplasty surgery were selected for this study. The tissues were randomly divided into 2 groups. Each pair of corneas had 1 cornea (group 1) prepared with NGENUITY (Alcon) with a 5-second staining time with vision blue, and the fellow cornea (group 2) was prepared using a OPMI Lumera 700 surgical microscope (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) with a 30-second staining time. DMEK graft preparation time, speed of stripping, graft width, and endothelial cell loss were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-eight pairs of corneas were included in this study. The graft preparation time was significantly higher in the 3D group than in the conventional group (498 ± 147 vs. 418 ± 85 seconds, P value = 0.031). The mean speed of stripping was 0.59 ± 0.081 mm/s in group 1 and 0.089 ± 0.005 mm/s in group 2 ( P value = 0.024). The mean endothelial cell density in group 1 and group 2 before tissue preparation was 2162 ± 115.21 and 2153 ± 122.45, respectively ( P value > 0.1). After tissue preparation, the endothelial cell density reduced to 1911 ± 150.72 in group 1 and 1998 ± 90.72 in group 2 ( P value = P value > 0.05). The graft width was 5.05 ± 0.71 mm in group 1 and 4.92 ± 0.23 mm in group 2 ( P value > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: DMEK tissue preparation with 3D display system NGENUITY is feasible with a slightly increased preparation time. The improved visualization allows a reduced staining time that could be beneficial for eye banks because it may reduce the toxic effect of staining colorants.

Evaluation of Efficacy, Efficiency, and Cell Viability of a Novel Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft Preparation Device, DescePrep, in Nondiabetic and Diabetic Human Donor Corneas.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and efficiency of a Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft preparation device, DescePrep, through measurement of graft viability, yield, and preparation time in both healthy and diabetic (high-risk) donor eyes. METHODS: Twenty nondiabetic and 10 diabetic donor corneas were processed using DescePrep, which standardizes the liquid bubble technique. Corneas were stained with trypan blue and then processed. Cell counts through specular microscopy, optical coherence tomography imaging, and slit-lamp analysis were used for the evaluation of graft separation and viability in 5 nondiabetic corneas. The remaining 25 corneas (15 nondiabetic and 10 diabetic) were evaluated for preparation success rate and processing time. Ten corneas (5 nondiabetic and 5 diabetic) were randomly selected for further evaluation of global cell loss through staining. RESULTS: Ninety-seven percent of corneas (29 of 30) were prepared successfully with DescePrep. The average preparation time was 2.83 ± 1.8 minutes. There was no significant difference in the time of preparation between the nondiabetic and diabetic groups (P = 0.077). The overall average cell death after processing was 7.9% ± 3.7% for all corneas. There was no significant difference in cell viability between diabetic and nondiabetic tissues after DescePrep processing (P = 0.769). CONCLUSIONS: DescePrep is a new DMEK preparation technique that can process both nondiabetic and diabetic donor corneas at high yields in minutes. High-yield preparation of diabetic corneas may offer eye banks access to a larger donor pool, which is important because the demand for DMEK grafts continues to rise worldwide.

Modified procedure for Loading "Flat" DMEK Grafts Into an Injector.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine whether loading a Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft using a drop-in procedure results in more endothelial cell loss (ECL) than the standard suction procedure. METHODS: Pairs of donor corneas with equivalent preprocessing endothelium were prepared using the standard protocol of our eye bank. One member of each pair was loaded into an injector using the standard suction protocol. The mate graft was loaded using a drop-in protocol, in which the edge of the graft was gently grasped with a forceps, lifted to the edge of the injector, and dropped inside. Grafts were evaluated for ECL and examined for grab marks or other loading-associated damage. RESULTS: There was no difference in mean ECL of grafts prepared for DMEK using the standard protocol (20.6% ± 4.5%) compared with that of mate grafts prepared using the drop-in loading protocol (19.5% ± 4.8%, P = 0.59). There was no consistent pattern of damage in the drop-in-loaded grafts, as grab marks or other tissue damage associated with the drop-in loading protocol were not consistently identified by a trained corneal surgeon. CONCLUSIONS: ECL was not significantly different in grafts prepared using a drop-in loading procedure compared with grafts prepared using the standard suction protocol. The drop-in loading protocol may be particularly useful to surgeons who load their own grafts and eye bank processing technicians who encounter a "flat" DMEK graft that does not scroll or a loosely scrolled DMEK graft.

Endothelial Cell Viability after DMEK Graft Preparation.

Aim: To evaluate the effect of graft preparation and organ-culture storage on endothelial cell density (ECD) and viability of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts.Materials and methods: DMEK grafts (n = 27) were prepared at Amnitrans EyeBank Rotterdam from 27 corneas (15 donors) that were eligible for transplantation but could not be allocated due to the Covid-19-related cancellation of elective surgeries. Cell viability (by Calcein-AM staining) and ECD of five grafts originally scheduled for transplantation were evaluated on the originally planned surgery day, whereas 22 grafts from paired donor corneas were evaluated either directly post-preparation or after 3-7 days of storage. ECD was analyzed by light microscopy (LM ECD) and Calcein-AM staining (Calcein-ECD).Results: Light microscopy (LM) evaluation of all grafts showed an unremarkable endothelial cell monolayer directly after preparation. However, median Calcein-ECD for the five grafts initially allocated for transplantation was 18% (range 92-73%) lower than median LM ECD. For the paired DMEK grafts, Calcein-ECD determined by Calcein-AM staining on the day of graft preparation and after 3-7 days of graft storage showed a median decrease of 1% and 2%, respectively. Median percentage of central graft area populated by viable cells after preparation and after 3-7 days of graft storage was 88% and 92%, respectively.Conclusion: Cell viability of most of the grafts will not be affected by preparation and storage. Endothelial cell damage may be observed for some grafts within hours after preparation, with insignificant additional ECD changes during 3-7 days of graft storage. Implementing an additional post-preparation step in the eye bank to evaluate cell density before graft release for transplantation may help to reduce postoperative DMEK complications.

A Cluster of Corneal Donor Rim Cultures Positive for Achromobacter Species Associated With Contaminated Eye Solution.

PURPOSE: To investigate a cluster of corneoscleral rim cultures positive for Achromobacter species over a 6-month period at Massachusetts Eye and Ear. METHODS: An increased rate of positive corneal donor rim cultures was noted at Massachusetts Eye and Ear between July and December 2017. Positive cultures were subjected to identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing by phenotypic (MicroScan WalkAway) and genotypic (16S rDNA sequencing) methods. Samples of the eye wash solution (GeriCare) used in the eye bank were also evaluated. Antimicrobial activity of Optical-GS against Achromobacter spp. at 4°C and 37°C was assessed by time-kill kinetics assay. RESULTS: Of 99 donor rims cultured, 14 (14.1%) grew bacteria with 11 (78.6%) due to uncommon nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli. These had been identified by standard automated methods as Achromobacter (n = 3), Alcaligenes (n = 3), Ralstonia (n = 2), Pseudomonas (n = 2), and Stenotrophomonas (n = 1). Eight of these 11 isolates were subsequently available for molecular identification, and all were identified as Achromobacter spp. Six bottles of eyewash solution were evaluated and were positive for abundant Achromobacter spp. (3.4 × 105 ± 1.1 CFU/mL). Optisol-GS had no bactericidal activity against Achromobacter spp. at 4°C after 24-hour incubation but was bactericidal at 37°C. None of the patients who had received the contaminated corneas developed postoperative infection. CONCLUSIONS: An eyewash solution arising from a single lot was implicated in the contamination of donor rims by Achromobacter spp. The isolates were able to survive in the Optisol-GS medium at the recommended storage temperature. This highlights the need to continue improving protocols for tissue preparation and storage.

Techniques, Outcomes, and Complications of Preloaded, Trifolded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Using the DMEK EndoGlide.

PURPOSE: To describe 2 insertion techniques, outcomes, and complications of preloaded, trifolded Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) cases using the DMEK EndoGlide inserter. METHODS: This retrospective, consecutive case series analyzed the first 35 cases using the DMEK EndoGlide performed between October 2018 and October 2019 at a single center. Preloaded, trifolded DMEK tissues were delivered through a fluid-injected or pull-through technique. To inject the tissue, a burst of fluid was delivered into the lumen of the injector with a second instrument. Postoperatively, best-spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), pachymetry, graft survival, and complications were assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-five eyes of 29 patients underwent DMEK alone (n = 11), with cataract surgery (n = 21), or with additional surgeries (n = 3). Of these, 19 (54.3%) grafts were injected. Video analysis revealed a median time of 3.5 minutes from graft insertion to opening for gas insertion. Median preoperative BSCVA of 0.398 logMAR improved to 0.097 logMAR (P = 0.02) at 9 months. Median pachymetry decreased from 619 µm to 551 µm (P = 0.03) at 9 months. Median donor endothelial cell count of 2890.5 cells/mm2 reduced to 2123 cells/mm2 (26.6% endothelial cell loss; P = 0.008) 6 months postoperatively. One (2.9%) graft failed due to inverted marking at the eye bank and subsequent reverse implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-loaded, tri-folded tissues can be implanted with acceptable levels of endothelial cell loss. We describe a no-touch method of injecting pre-loaded, tri-folded tissue and highlight incorrect marking as a potential complication. This may not be identifiable intraoperatively due to lack of scroll formation.

Ink Retention and Endothelial Cell Viability After the Application of an Orientation Stamp Over an Air Bubble During Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft Preparation.

PURPOSE: To investigate stamp visibility and endothelial cell loss (ECL) after the application of an orientation mark to Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts supported by an air bubble. METHODS: Eighteen DMEK grafts were prepared at an eye bank using a technique where an orientation mark was applied to the stromal surface of a DMEK graft that was supported by a small air bubble placed at the edge of the 2 endothelial surfaces of the graft. Grafts were evaluated at 2 and 5 days for stamp visibility and at 5 days with calcein-AM staining for ECL. Nine grafts underwent cross-country shipping, and the ECL of shipped and nonshipped grafts was compared using unpaired t test. RESULTS: All 18 DMEK grafts exhibited a single, solid, readily visible orientation mark 2 and 5 days after preparation with a mean ECL of 13.5% ± 4.9%. Shipping conditions had no effect on stain retention or ECL. CONCLUSIONS: The application of an orientation stamp to a DMEK graft over an air bubble in an eye bank setting results in a single, solid orientation mark that is readily visible within the period in which most eye bank-prepared tissue is used. This technique produces no further ECL compared with the methods where the orientation stamp is applied through a stromal window. Eye bank technicians and surgeons can be confident that this modified preparation technique results in transplant-quality DMEK grafts with the additional benefit of conserving the stromal cap for use in other anterior lamellar procedures, thereby making efficient use of donor tissue.

Tissue Loss, Processing Time, and Primary Graft Failure in Eye Bank-Prepared Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts Before and After Prestripped to Preloaded Graft Transition.

PURPOSE: To examine tissue loss rates, processing time, and primary graft failure (PGF) of "prestripped-only" Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts at a single eye bank and how these parameters changed after the introduction of steps to preload tissue among experienced processors. METHODS: Tissue loss and processing time during DMEK graft preparation as well as PGF were analyzed retrospectively at a single eye bank between 2012 and 2018. Outcomes were assessed in consecutive grafts before and after the introduction of preloading to the eye bank's standard operating procedure. RESULTS: A total of 1326 grafts were analyzed, composed of the first 663 preloaded DMEK grafts and, for comparison, the 663 DMEK grafts processed immediately before starting the preloaded service. Mean processing time increased from 17.0 ± 3.9 minutes to 26.0 ± 5.4 minutes with the advent of preloading (P < 0.01). Initially, average processing time increased dramatically, with a maximum processing time of 51 minutes, before regressing to the average. No significant difference in the rate of tissue wastage was observed before versus after the implementation of preloaded DMEK (1.2% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.48). PGF occurred in 7 grafts before the preloaded service and 10 grafts after starting the service (1.6% vs. 2.3%, P = 0.47). CONCLUSIONS: Preloading does not affect tissue wastage for experienced technicians or the PGF rate but increases processing time. Eye banks that are considering adding preloading to their standard operating procedure may need to account for longer processing times in their daily operations.

Vertical Scrolling Axis of Corneal Endothelial Grafts for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: Heterogeneity in scrolling behavior of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts complicates DMEK surgery. This prospective observational study assessed scrolling axes of DMEK grafts relative to the donor's eye. METHODS: The eye bank randomly marked the rim of corneoscleral donor buttons during trephination and recorded the position relative to the donor's axis. Surgeons were masked to the absolute position of the eye bank marking and recorded the scrolling axis relative to the eye bank marking and DMEK upside-down orientation. The scrolling axis was categorized as vertical (0 to 30 degrees and 150 to 180 degrees), oblique (>30 to 60 degrees and 120 to <150 degrees), and horizontal (>60 to <120 degrees). Scrolling patterns of corneas from the same donor were assessed. RESULTS: Scrolling patterns of 202 donor corneas from 149 donors were determined. The donor graft scrolled predominantly vertically to the donor's cornea [75%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 68%-80%]. Horizontal axes (11%) and oblique axes (14%) were less common. The median deviation in scrolling axes after unfolding the grafts was 0 degrees from the original scrolling axis (interquartile range, 0-15), indicating that scrolling axes were stable. Fellow eyes of 46 donors had 3.55 times higher odds of a nonvertical scrolling pattern if the first eye had a nonvertical scrolling pattern (95% CI, 1.37-9.20), suggesting that donor factors influencing both eyes could contribute to scrolling patterns. CONCLUSIONS: DMEK grafts have a natural and stable scrolling tendency at vertical axis of donor's cornea. Anticipating scrolling axes might help improve preparation techniques for DMEK grafts and outcomes.

Eye Bank Management of Irregular Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Lenticules.

PURPOSE: To report the management of precut Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) lenticules unsuitable for transplantation because of irregular anterior profile after microkeratome cutting. METHODS: After preparation for DSAEK, 20 tissues were considered unsuitable for transplantation because of nonhomogeneous posterior stromal thickness. To convert them into suitable tissues for surgery, manual stromal delamination was performed by removing the excess stromal layers after the indications obtained through optical coherence tomography. These tissues were further transplanted as ultrathin DSAEK. RESULTS: Nineteen tissues were delaminated successfully. The average reduction in thickness in the center (63 ± 69 µm; P = 0.0101) and periphery (129 ± 39 µm; P < 0.0001) before and after delamination was significantly different. One tissue showed signs of perforation during manual dissection and therefore considered unsuitable for transplantation. Primary graft failure was reported in one case, but it was not correlated with the tissue preparation. No other clinical complications were observed after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Manual delamination of the stroma because of irregular microkeratome cutting is a viable option to obtain a uniform graft thickness required for DSAEK surgeries. This technique can further reduce tissue wastage that is observed after microkeratome cutting errors.

SARS-CoV-2: Impact on, Risk Assessment and Countermeasures in German Eye Banks.

INTRODUCTION: Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic there has been some debate regarding the risk of transmission through tissue transplantation and tissue banking processes. AIM OF THE STUDY: To analyze the changes that SARS-CoV-2 has caused regarding the harvesting of corneal donor tissue and eye bank activities in Germany. METHODS: A questionnaire was provided to 26 eye banks in Germany, consisting of questions about adaptations made in the screening of potential donors and the harvesting of corneal tissue following the pandemic spread of SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: Eighteen eye banks actively reduced recruitment of donors and two banks ceased all activity. Additional diagnostic screening was performed in eight banks, using conjunctival swabs and/or nasopharyngeal swabs. In six eye banks, additional protective measures, such as FFP2 masks and/or facial shields, were implemented. Overall, a mean reduction in the number of obtained donor tissues of 17% was observed. DISCUSSION: Conjunctival and/or nasopharyngeal swabs of donors have been implemented by a minority. Reasons for not performing additional tests may be moderate sensitivity and lack of validation for postmortem use of RT-PCR testing. Also, the hazard of SARS-CoV-2 entering the corneal donor pool with subsequent transmission might be perceived as theoretical. Face shields provide a sufficient barrier against splash and splatter contamination but may be insufficient against aerosols. Additional face masks would provide support against aerosols, but it remains debatable if corneal harvesting can be considered an aerosol-producing procedure. In the future we expect to see changes in current guidelines because of a surge in scientific activities to improve our understanding of the risks involved with cornea donation in the COVID-19 pandemic, and because current practice may reduce the availability of donor corneas due to new exclusion criteria while the demand remains unchanged.

One-Year Clinical Outcomes of Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Non-Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To compare the one-year outcomes of preloaded Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (pDMEK) and non-preloaded DMEK (n-pDMEK) in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). METHODS: This retrospective comparative cohort study consecutively included 68 eyes with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy who underwent either pDMEK (n = 38) or n-pDMEK (n = 30) performed by cornea fellows with an experienced surgeon between 2016 and 2018 at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary. Exclusion criteria were previous surgery (other than uncomplicated cataract surgery) and any documented evidence of macular or other corneal diseases. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), central corneal thickness, intraocular pressure, patient characteristics, postprocessing endothelial cell count, donor graft data, and complications were compared. RESULTS: CDVA showed similar results for pDMEK (0.12 ± 0.11 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution [LogMAR]) and n-pDMEK (0.13 ± 0.13 LogMAR) (P = 0.827). Sixty-six percent of the pDMEK eyes and 57% of the n-pDMEK eyes achieved a VA of ≥0.1 LogMAR, and 95% and 97%, respectively, achieved a CDVA ≥0.3 LogMAR. The preoperative central corneal thickness of pDMEK and n-pDMEK (644 ± 62.2 µm, 660.5 ± 56.2 µm) decreased significantly after surgery (525.1 ± 43.6 µm, 526.5 ± 45.2 µm, P < 0.001), with no difference between groups (P = 0.840). The postprocessing endothelial cell count did not differ between pDMEK (2959.2 ± 182.9 cells/mm2) and n-pDMEK (2939.3 ± 278.7 cells/mm2) (P = 0.484). Complication rates were comparable with just the rebubbling performed in a minor procedure room showing a lower rate for pDMEK (13.16%) compared with n-pDMEK (33.33%) (P < 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: One-year clinical outcomes were similar between pDMEK and n-pDMEK procedures, rendering eye bank-prepared pDMEK tissues a useful tool in the treatment of endothelial dysfunction.