Feasibility and safety of bipolar radiofrequency track cautery during percutaneous image-guided abdominal biopsy procedures.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of using a bipolar radiofrequency track cautery device during percutaneous image-guided abdominal biopsy procedures in at-risk patients. METHODS: Forty-two patients (26-79 years old; female 44%) with at least one bleeding risk factor who underwent an abdominal image-guided (CT or US) biopsy and intended bipolar radiofrequency track cautery (BRTC) were retrospectively studied. An 18G radiofrequency electrode was inserted through a 17G biopsy introducer needle immediately following coaxial 18G core biopsy, to cauterize the biopsy track using temperature control. Bleeding risk factors, technical success, and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: BRTC was technically successful in 41/42 (98%) of procedures; in one patient, the introducer needle retracted from the liver due to respiratory motion prior to BRTC. BRTC following percutaneous biopsy was applied during 41 abdominal biopsy procedures (renal mass = 12, renal parenchyma = 10, liver mass = 9, liver parenchyma = 5, splenic mass or parenchyma = 4, gastrohepatic mass = 1). All patients had one or more of the following risk factors: high-risk organ (spleen or renal parenchyma), hypervascular mass, elevated prothrombin time, renal insufficiency, thrombocytopenia, recent anticoagulation or anticoagulation not withheld for recommended interval, cirrhosis, intraprocedural hypertension, brisk back bleeding observed from the introducer needle, or subcapsular tumor location. No severe adverse events (grade 3 or higher) occurred. Two (2/41, 5%) mild (grade 1) bleeding events did not cause symptoms or require intervention. CONCLUSION: Bipolar radiofrequency track cautery was feasible and safe during percutaneous image-guided abdominal biopsy procedures. IRB approval: MBG 2022P002277.

Exploration of predictors associated with bleeding in computed tomography-guided core needle splenic biopsy: A retrospective study.

Splenic diseases may be caused by infections and can be either malignant, such as lymphoma and lung cancer, or benign, such as hemangioma. In some cases, diagnostic uncertainty of imaging persists, and image-guided splenic needle biopsy is a useful diagnostic tool to avoid the disadvantages of incorrect diagnosis, including performing unnecessary splenectomy or not giving the necessary treatment. Splenic biopsies can be divided into ultrasound-guided, computed tomography (CT)-guided fine-needle aspiration, or core needle biopsy (CNB). However, few studies have focused exclusively on complications associated with CT-guided CNB of the spleen. Therefore, we assessed bleeding, the most common complication of CT-guided CNB of the spleen, and evaluated factors associated with the bleeding. Using the biopsy database maintained at the institution, all patients who underwent CT-guided CNB of the spleen between May 2012 and September 2022 were identified retrospectively. The 18 identified patients were divided into post-biopsy bleeding and non-bleeding groups for analysis. In total, 17 patients (94.4%) could be diagnosed accurately with CT-guided CNB. Bleeding complications occurred in 7 cases of CT-guided CNB; of these, 2 patients with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 4 disease required transcatheter arterial embolization. The bleeding group was characterized by diffuse spleen tumors in all cases, with significantly more diffuse spleen tumors than the non-bleeding group. CT-guided CNB is a useful option for neoplastic lesions of the spleen that are difficult to diagnose using imaging alone. However, consideration should be given to post-biopsy bleeding in patients with diffuse splenic tumors.

Ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic value and safety of ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for relevant were searched for studies published up to June 2022. The diagnostic accuracy of US-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) for the diagnosis of PPLs was evaluated using pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive and negative likelihood ratios (PLR and NLR), and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curves value (SROC). RESULTS: The search included 12 original studies (3,830 procedures). For US-guided PTNB, the pooled sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of PPLs were 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91-0.94) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.96-1.00), respectively. The pooled estimates of the PLR, NLR, and DOR were 134.88 (95% CI: 24.88-731.74), 0.07 (95% CI: 0.06-0.09), and 1,814.95 (95% CI: 333.62-9,873.76), respectively. The area under the SROC curve was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97). The overall complication rate was 3.6% (136 of 3,830), including self-limited haemoptysis and asymptomatic pneumothorax, and only six cases of pneumothorax requiring chest tube drainage and one case of severe bleeding were reported. CONCLUSIONS: US-guided core-needle biopsy is an excellent diagnostic tool for PPLs, with high accuracy and excellent technical performance and safety.

Assessment of diagnostic accuracy and complication rates of CT-guided percutaneous core-needle biopsy for lung lesion: difference between solid and sub-solid nodules based on propensity score matching analysis.

AIM: To compare the success and complication rates of computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous core-needle biopsy (PCNB) based on the density of lung nodules, using propensity score matching (PSM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-centre retrospective study included 1,312 PCNB cases of lung lesions, including solid (n=1,120), part-solid (n=115), and non-solid nodules (n=77), that were detected between March 2013 and March 2021. The diagnostic accuracy and complication rates of pneumothorax and pulmonary haemorrhage were analysed before PSM. To perform PSM, part-solid and non-solid nodules were combined and newly defined as sub-solid nodules. The diagnostic accuracy and complication rates of pneumothorax and pulmonary haemorrhage were then compared between solid and sub-solid nodules after PSM. RESULTS: Among the 1,312 included cases, the success rate and incidence of pneumothorax after CT-guided PCNB for solid, part-solid, and non-solid nodules were not statistically different (p=0.080 and 0.410). However, the rates of overall pulmonary haemorrhage showed statistical differences (p<0.001), particularly between solid and part-solid nodules (p<0.001) and between solid and non-solid nodules (p<0.001). After PSM, the incidence rates of overall pulmonary haemorrhage in solid and sub-solid nodules were 8.9% (17/192) and 29.7% (44/182), respectively, showing a statistically significant difference (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: There is increased risk of haemorrhage in CT-guided needle biopsy of sub-solid nodules compared to solid nodules. Increased emphasis should be placed on the risk of pulmonary haemorrhage when consenting these patients.

Open Versus Core Needle Biopsy in Lower-Extremity Sarcoma: Current Practice Patterns and Patient Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Historically, open biopsy (OB) was the gold standard for sarcoma diagnosis. Core needle biopsy (CNB) has become increasingly common. There are limited data evaluating how the type of biopsy impacts definitive surgical resection or postoperative outcomes. The aims of this study were to (1) characterize current international biopsy practice patterns, and (2) evaluate how the type of biopsy performed impacts the resection surgery, infection risk, oncological complications, and patient-reported functional outcome scores. METHODS: This study was a preplanned secondary analysis of the prospective, multicenter PARITY (Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens in Tumor Surgery) study. Patients with a benign diagnosis, metastatic disease, or no biopsy prior to surgery were excluded. Prospectively collected demographic, biopsy, surgical, and outcome variables were analyzed, and differences between patients undergoing OB and CNB were assessed. Parametric and nonparametric tests were used to compare variables between groups, and the Cox proportional hazards method was used to compare infection-related and oncological outcomes at 1 year. Median functional outcome scores at 1 year were compared. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty-four patients met the inclusion criteria. Data were collected from 48 sarcoma centers in 12 countries. CNB was the more utilized biopsy modality overall (57.5%). OB was more common in the U.S. and Canada. The median operative time was significantly longer for patients who underwent OB (324 versus 260 minutes; p < 0.001). Significantly more skin (p < 0.001) and fascial tissue (p < 0.001) were excised in the OB group, which also had a lower rate of primary closure (86.3% versus 92.9%; p = 0.03). There were no differences in surgical site infection or oncological outcomes between the groups at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: CNB was the more common biopsy modality in the PARITY study in most countries. However, OB was more common in the U.S. and Canada. Patients undergoing OB had longer operative times, more excised tissue, and lower rates of primary closure, but this did not translate to differences in infection rates or oncological outcomes, including local recurrence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Bleeding Events After Image-Guided Breast Biopsies: Comparison of Patients Temporarily Discontinuing Versus Maintaining Antithrombotic Therapy During Biopsy.

BACKGROUND. Antithrombic (AT) therapy is commonly temporarily discontinued before breast core needle biopsy (CNB), introducing risks of thrombotic events and diagnostic delay. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to compare the frequency of postbiopsy bleeding events among patients without AT use, patients temporarily discontinuing AT therapy, and patients maintaining AT therapy during breast CNB. METHODS. This retrospective study included 5302 patients (median age, 52 years) who underwent image-guided breast or axillary CNB between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2019. From January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2016, patients temporarily discontinued all AT therapy for 5 days before CNB; from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019, patients maintained AT therapy during CNB. Immediate postbiopsy mammograms were reviewed for imaging-apparent hematoma. Patients were called 24-48 hours after biopsy and asked regarding palpable hematoma and breast bruise. The EMR was reviewed for clinically significant postbiopsy hematoma (i.e., hematoma requiring drainage, primary care or emergency department visit for persistent symptoms, or hospital admission). Bleeding events were compared among groups, including Firth bias-reduced multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS. During CNB, 4665 patients were not receiving AT therapy, 423 temporarily discontinued AT therapy, and 214 maintained AT therapy. Imaging-apparent hematoma occurred in 3% of patients without AT use, 6% of patients discontinuing AT therapy, and 7% of patients maintaining AT therapy (p = .60 [discontinuing vs maintaining]). Palpable hematoma occurred in 2% of patients without AT use, 4% of patients maintaining AT therapy, and 4% of patients discontinuing AT therapy (p = .92 [discontinuing vs maintaining]). Breast bruise occurred in 2% of patients without AT use, 1% of patients discontinuing AT therapy, and 6% of patients maintaining AT therapy (p < .001 [discontinuing vs maintaining]). In multivariable analysis adjusting for age, biopsy imaging modality, needle gauge, number of biopsy samples, and pathologic result, discontinued AT therapy (using maintained AT therapy as reference) was not a significant independent predictor of imaging-apparent hematoma (p = .23) or palpable hematoma (p = .91) but independently predicted decreased risk of bruise (OR = 0.11, p < .001). No patient developed clinically significant postbiopsy hematoma. CONCLUSION. Frequencies of imaging-apparent and palpable hematoma were not significantly different between patients temporarily discontinuing versus maintaining AT therapy. CLINICAL IMPACT. The findings support the safety of continuing AT therapy during CNB. Patients who maintain AT therapy should be counseled regarding risk of bruise.

Risk of complications after core needle biopsy in pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma.

Core needle biopsy (CNB) has been used with caution in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) due to concerns about catecholamine-related complications. While it is unclear what scientific evidence supports this claim, it has limited the acquisition of biological samples for diagnostic purposes and research, especially in metastatic PPGL. We performed a systematic review and individual patient meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of complications after CNB in PPGL patients. The primary and secondary objectives were to investigate the risk of death and the occurrence of complications requiring intervention or hospitalization, respectively. Fifty-six articles describing 86 PPGL patients undergoing CNB were included. Of the patients (24/71), 34% had metastases and 53.4% (31/58) had catecholamine-related symptoms before CNB. Of the patients (14/41), 34.1% had catecholamine excess testing prior to the biopsy. No CNB-related deaths were reported. Four patients (14.8%, 4/27) experienced CNB-related complications requiring hospitalization or intervention. One case had a temporary duodenal obstruction caused by hematoma, two cases had myocardial infarction, and one case had Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. Eight patients (32%, 8/25) had CNB-related catecholamine symptoms, mainly transient hypertension, excessive diaphoresis, tachycardia, or hypertensive crisis. The scientific literature does not allow us to make any firm conclusion on the safety of CNB in PPGL. However, it is reasonable to argue that CNB could be conducted after thorough consideration, preparation, and with close follow-up for PPGL patients with a strong clinical indication for such investigation.

The comparison of efficacy and safety evaluation of vacuum-assisted Elite 10-G system and the traditional BARD 14-G core needle in breast diagnosis: an open-label, parallel, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) and core needle biopsy (CNB) are both widely used methods in diagnosing breast lesions. We aimed to determine whether the Elite 10-gauge VAB achieves higher accuracy than the BARD spring-actuated 14-gauge CNB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a phase 3, open-label, parallel, randomized controlled trial (NCT04612439). In total, 1470 patients with ultrasound (US)-visible breast lesions requiring breast biopsy were enrolled from April to July 2021 and randomized at a 1 : 1 ratio to undergo VAB or CNB. All patients underwent surgical excision after needle biopsy. The primary outcome was accuracy, defined as the proportion of patients who had a consistent qualitative diagnosis between the biopsy and surgical pathology results. The underestimation rate, false-negative rate and safety evaluations were the secondary endpoints. RESULTS: A total of 730 and 732 patients were evaluable for endpoints in the VAB and CNB groups, respectively. The accuracy of VAB surpassed that of CNB in the whole population (94.8 vs. 91.1%, P =0.009). The overall malignant underestimation rate was significantly lower in the VAB group than in the CNB group (21.4 vs. 30.9%, P =0.035). Additionally, significantly more false-negative events were noted in the CNB group (4.9 vs. 7.8%, P =0.037). In patients who presented with accompanying calcification, the accuracy of VAB surpassed that of CNB (93.2 vs. 88.3%, P =0.022). The potential superiority of VAB was indicated in patients with heterogeneous echo on US. CONCLUSIONS: In general, the 10-G VAB procedure is a reasonable alternative to the 14-G CNB procedure with higher accuracy. We recommend the use of VAB for lesions with accompanying calcification or heterogeneous echo on US.

Diagnostic Yield of Transabdominal Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Method in Biopsies of Pancreatic Lesions.

ABSTRACT: In this study, it was aimed to contribute to the selection of the method to perform pancreatic lesion biopsies.Data of patients, who had undergone a percutaneous biopsy because of pancreatic masses in our institution in the period between January 2015 and November 2019, were evaluated retrospectively. The percutaneous biopsy method, the type of needle used in the procedure, and periprocedural complications were listed. Pathology and cytology reports in the archive were reviewed, and biopsy results were divided into 3 groups as benign, malignant, and inadequate. Of 308 patients included in the study, the diagnostic accuracy was verified in 124 patients through the assessment of surgical outcomes, results of biopsies from metastatic lesions, or follow-up findings. The verified results were classified as true-positives and true-negatives.Of a total of 308 patients included in the study, 23 underwent a fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and 285 underwent a core needle biopsy (CNB). No statistical differences were observed in sample acquisition success and complications between the groups.Of the lesions with a confirmed pathological diagnosis, 67.74% were malignant and 32.26% were benign. The diagnosis was correct in 107 of 112 CNB patients (95.54%) and 9 of 12 FNAB patients (75.00%). When the success of the 2 methods was compared, it was found that outcomes of CNB were statistically more successful compared with those of FNAB.A transabdominal ultrasound-guided percutaneous CNB is a safe method with a high diagnostic yield to perform a biopsy of the pancreas.

Analysis of bleeding after ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of benign cervical lymph nodes.

AIM: Summarized the incidence of bleeding after ultrasound-guided coarse needle biopsy (US-CNB) of benign cervical lymph nodes. METHODS: We retrospectively examined the clinical and follow-up records of 590 patients with benign cervical lymph node disease who underwent US-CNB at our hospital during February 2015-July 2022 and were confirmed to have the disease by CNB and surgical pathology. The number of cases, types of diseases, and degree of bleeding of all patients with bleeding after US-CNB were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 590 patients, bleeding was noted in 44 cases(7.46%), and the infectious lymph node bleeding rate was 9.48%. Infectious lymph nodes were more likely to bleed than noninfectious lymph nodes after CNB, ,x2 = 8.771; P = 0.003, Lymph nodes with pus were more likely to bleed than solid lymph nodes after CNB, x2 = 4.414; P = 0.036,. CONCLUSION: The bleeding of all patients after CNB was minor bleeding. Infected lymph nodes bleed more frequently than noninfected lymph nodes. Lymph nodes with mobility and a large pus cavity, are more likely to bleed after CNB.

Safety and accuracy of aortic and periaortic CT-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and accuracy of aortic and periaortic computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy performed at a single center over 12 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of cases performed between February 2010 and August 2022 in which the biopsied region was in direct contact with the aorta or great vessels including the pericardium and common iliac arteries. Clinical notes were reviewed for any early or delayed complications following the procedure, which if present were graded using the National Institute of Health's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Pathology results were compared to subsequent outside biopsy results or follow-up surgical pathology, if available, as well as subsequent clinical decision making and/or clinical course, to determine concordance. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, and accuracy (indicative of diagnostic yield) were calculated. RESULTS: 32 core needle biopsies were reviewed from 30 patients (average lesion longest diameter 3.1 cm, range 0.5-10.9 cm; average needle proximity to the vessel endothelium or deep side of the pericardium 1.0 cm, range 0.3-1.8 cm). Complications occurred in 46.9% of cases (15/32), 93.3% (14/15) of which were minor and included small amounts of bleeding or pain. One patient developed a small nonemergent pneumothorax. Of biopsies obtained, 96.9% provided adequate tissue for diagnosis (31/32). When evaluating concordance between pathological and final diagnosis, sensitivity was 94.7% and specificity was 83.3%; positive and negative predictive value were 90.0% and 90.9%, respectively. Accuracy (diagnostic yield) of biopsy was 90.3%. CONCLUSION: CT-guided percutaneous aortic and periaortic core needle biopsies are safe and efficacious procedures with high diagnostic yield.

Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Core Needle Biopsy for Deep Head and Neck Space Lesions: Technical Feasibility, Histopathologic Yield, and Safety.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ultrasound is generally considered to have a minor role in guiding biopsies for deep head and neck space lesions. However, the ultrasound fusion technique may have the potential to change this opinion. This study evaluated the feasibility, histopathologic yield, and safety of ultrasound fusion-guided core needle biopsies for deep head and neck space lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 2021 to April 2022, patients with primary deep head and neck space lesions were prospectively included in this study. Ultrasound fusion was performed with contemporaneous CT, MR imaging, or PET/CT studies, and ultrasound fusion-guided core needle biopsy was performed by using a Micro-Convex probe via 4 different needle approaches. Feasibility, histopathologic results, and biopsy-related complications were observed. Descriptive statistics were applied. RESULTS: Ultrasound-guided biopsy was feasible in all 16 patients (11 women and 5 men; mean age 46 [SD, 16] years; range, 16-76 years). The lesions were located in the parapharyngeal space, infratemporal fossa, and skull base, with a median diameter of 3.8 cm (range, 2.2-6.5 cm). An adequate and definite histopathologic yield was obtained in 15/16 (93.8%) patients; among them, 4/15 lesions (26.7%) were malignant, and 11/15 (73.6%) were benign. No major complications occurred. Minor complications were noted in 2 of the 16 (12.5%) patients (self-limiting inflammation in 1 and bleeding in 1). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy of deep head and neck space lesions is feasible and safe, with a high histopathologic yield.

A novel core biopsy needle with shorter dead space for percutaneous image-guided musculoskeletal biopsies - how does it compare with an established core biopsy needle?

PURPOSE: To compare diagnostic yield and utility of a novel core biopsy needle (NCBN) with shortened tip dead space for percutaneous musculoskeletal biopsies with an established core biopsy needle (ECBN). METHODS: This study was IRB approved and HIPAA compliant. All percutaneous biopsies using an NCBN performed between July 2020 and August 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Data on patient demographics, biopsy technique, biopsy needle, and histopathology were collated. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were included in this study, 16 (44%) undergoing biopsy with both an NCBN and an ECBN, and 20 (56%) with an NCBN only. All 36 NCBN biopsies were 16 gauge. Fifteen (94%) of the ECBN biopsies were 14 gauge, and 1 (6%) was 16 gauge. Thirty-four (94%) of the NCBN and 15 (94%) of the ECBN biopsies were diagnostic. No adverse events were identified. CONCLUSION: Both the NCBN and ECBN have high diagnostic rates. No adverse events were identified. NCBN could be considered for biopsy of lesions limited by anatomic location or near adjacent critical structures.

Antithrombotic Therapy and Hematoma Risk during Image-guided Core-Needle Breast Biopsy.

Background For image-guided core-needle breast biopsy (CNBB), it remains unclear whether antithrombotic medication should be withheld because of hematoma risk. Purpose To determine hematoma risk after CNBB in patients receiving antithrombotic medication and to stratify risk by antithrombotic type. Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant retrospective study included US-, stereotactic-, or MRI-guided CNBBs performed across six academic and six private practices between April 2019 and April 2021. Patients were instructed to continue antithrombotic medications, forming two groups: antithrombotic and nonantithrombotic. Hematomas were defined as new biopsy-site masses with a diameter of 2 cm or larger on postprocedure mammograms. Hematomas were considered clinically significant if management involved an intervention other than manual compression. Patient age, type of antithrombotic medication, practice type, image guidance modality, needle gauge and type, and outcome of pathologic analysis were recorded. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to analyze variables associated with hematomas. Results A total of 3311 biopsies were performed in 2664 patients (median age, 60 years; IQR, 48-70 years; 2658 women). The nonantithrombotic group included 2788 biopsies, and the antithrombotic group included 523 biopsies (328 low-dose aspirin, 73 full-dose antiplatelet drugs, 51 direct oral anticoagulants, 36 warfarin, 32 daily nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, three heparin or enoxaparin). The antithrombotic group had a higher overall hematoma rate (antithrombotic group: 49 of 523 biopsies [9.4%], nonantithrombotic group: 172 of 2788 biopsies [6.2%]; P = .007), but clinically significant hematoma rates were not different (antithrombotic group: two of 523 biopsies [0.4%], nonantithrombotic group: one of 2788 biopsies [0.04%]; P = .07). At multivariable analysis, age (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.03; P < .001), 9-gauge or larger needles (OR, 2.1; 95% CI: 1.28, 3.3; P = .003), and full-dose antiplatelet drugs (OR, 2.5; 95% CI: 1.29, 5.0; P = .007) were associated with higher hematoma rates. US guidance (OR, 0.26; 95% CI: 0.17, 0.40; P < .001) and 10-14-gauge needles (OR, 0.53; 95% CI: 0.36, 0.79; P = .002) were predictive of no hematoma. Conclusion Because clinically significant hematomas were uncommon, withholding antithrombotic medications before core-needle breast biopsy may be unnecessary. Postbiopsy hematomas were associated with full-dose antiplatelet drugs, patient age, and 9-gauge or larger needles. No association was found with other types of antithrombotic medication. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Chang and Yoen in this issue.

Accuracy of CT-Guided Core-Needle Biopsy in Diagnosis of Thoracic Lesions Suspicious for Primitive Malignancy of the Lung: A Five-Year Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer represents a heterogeneous group of neoplasms, with the highest frequency and mortality in both sexes combined. In a clinical scenario characterized by the widespread of multidetector-row spiral CT, core-needle biopsy under tomographic guidance is one of the main and safest methods to obtain tissue specimens, even though there are relatively high rates of pneumothorax (0-60% incidence) and pulmonary hemorrhage (4-27% occurrence rates). The aim of this retrospective study is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CT-guided core-needle biopsy in the diagnosis of primary lung malignancies and to compare our results with evidence from the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our analysis included 350 thoracic biopsies, performed from 2017 to 2022 with a 64-row CT guidance and 16/18 G needles mounted on a biopsy gun. We included in the final cohort all samples with evidence of primary lung malignancies, precursor lesions, and atypia, as well as inconclusive and negative diagnoses. RESULTS: There was sensitivity of 90.07% (95% CI 86.05-93.25%), accuracy of 98.87% (95% CI 98.12-99.69%), positive predictive value of 100%, and negative value of 98.74% (95% CI 98.23-99.10%). Specificity settled at 100% (93.84-100%). The AUC was 0.952 (95% CI 0.924-0.972). Only three patients experienced major complications after the procedure. Among minor complications, longer distances from the pleura, the presence of emphysema, and the lower dimensions of the lesions were correlated with the development of pneumothorax after the procedure, while longer distances from the pleura and the lower dimensions of the lesions were correlated with intra-alveolar hemorrhage. Immunohistochemistry analysis was performed in 51% of true positive cases, showing TTF-1, CK7, and p40 expression, respectively, in 26%, 24%, and 10% of analyzed samples. CONCLUSIONS: The CT-guided thoracic core-needle biopsy is an extremely accurate and safe diagnostic procedure for the histological diagnosis of lung cancer, a first-level interventional radiology exam for peripheral and subpleural lesions of the lung, which is also able to provide adequate samples for advanced pathologic assays (e.g., FISH, PCR) to assess molecular activity and genetic sequencing.

Predictors of Major Hemorrhage After Spleen Core Biopsy in Cancer Patients.

In this retrospective study, 232 spleen biopsies from 218 patients with cancer were assessed. Biopsies resulting in hemorrhage requiring hospitalization, transfusion, or other interventions were compared with those that did not. The maximization of the Youden index helped determine the optimal systolic blood pressure (SBP) and platelet count thresholds. There were 15 (7%) major hemorrhages among 211 core biopsies. A multivariate logistic regression model showed that higher SBP, lower platelet count, and the lack of ultrasound guidance were independently associated with major hemorrhage (P < .05). The optimal SBP cutoff was 140 mm Hg, and the platelet count cutoff was 120,000 platelets/µL. In conclusion, the high major hemorrhage rate of 7% among percutaneous core spleen biopsies in patients with cancer may be mitigated by controlling SBP to <140 mm Hg and avoiding biopsy in patients with thrombocytopenia.

Comparative study on efficacy and safety of ultrasound guided transoral and transcutaneous core needle biopsy in patients with oral masses.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US) guided transoral biopsy is a novel and safe procedure for obtaining tissue in patients with oral masses. However, this procedure is less commonly used in comparison to US guided transcutaneous biopsy. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of US-guided transoral and transcutaneous core needle biopsy (CNB) in patients with oral masses. METHODS: From November 2019 to March 2021, consecutive patients with oral masses were randomly assigned to undergo US-guided transoral CNB (transoral group) and US-guided transcutaneous CNB from a submental approach (transcutaneous group). During the operation, procedure time, intra­operative blood loss volume, diagnostic performance, rate of complications and pain level were recorded and compared. RESULTS: There were 112 patients (62 in the transoral group and 50 in the transcutaneous group) evaluated in this study. The postprocedural complication rate of the transcutaneous group was significantly higher than the transoral group (24% vs. 0%, P = 0.000). There was no significant difference in accuracy (95.2% vs. 88%, P = 0.30), biopsy time (76 ± 12 s vs. 80 ± 13 s, p = 0.09), blood losses (2.6 ± 0.5 mL vs. 2.7 ± 0.4 mL, p = 0.17) and visual analogue score (p = 0.327 and p = 0.444 before and after the sampling procedure) between the two groups. CONCLUSION: US-guided transoral CNB results in high rates of technical success and lower rates of postprocedural complications.

Marked safety and high diagnostic yield of freehand ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsies performed by pulmonologists.

BACKGROUND: Adequate tissue sampling is fundamental for establishing a definitive diagnosis, assessing prognosis and tailoring therapy. Each of the methods for obtaining tissue (e.g., endoscopic, image guidance and surgical biopsies) results in a different diagnostic yield and complication rate profile. OBJECTIVES: Present feasibility, and assess safety and efficacy of freehand transthoracic ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsies (USGNB) of thoracic lesions performed by pulmonologist. METHODS: A retrospective analysis study of ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsies of thoracic lesions performed at the Pulmonary Institute of Rabin Medical Center was conducted from September 2020 to October 2021. All core-needle biopsies were performed under local anesthesia with guidance of Mindray TE7 2019 US system. Procedural variables including complications and pathological diagnostic yield were the primary end point. IRB 0671-21-RMC. RESULTS: In total 91 biopsy procedures were analyzed in38 females and 53 males, average age 71.1 years. Twenty-three (25.3%) cases were lung lesions, 7 (7.7%) - mediastinal, 13 (14.3%) - chest wall, 27 (29.7%) - pleural, and 21 (23.1%) supraclavicular lesions. Average lesion size was 51.6 mm, the largest in the mediastinum and the smallest in supraclavicular locations (97.7mm and 28.0 mm, respectively). Overall pathological diagnostic yield was 90%, highest success in chest wall (100%) and lowest in mediastinal biopsies (71.4%). We had only one complication -hemothorax resolved by chest tube drainage- accounting for only 1.1% complication rate. CONCLUSION: Safety and efficacy were demonstrated in freehand US-guided core-needle biopsy of thoracic lesions performed by pulmonologists. We suggest thoracic ultrasound and USG-CNB be part of training and clinical practice in interventional pulmonology.

Comparison between computed tomography-guided core and fine needle lung biopsy: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the safety and diagnostic performance between computed tomography (CT)-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) and fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in lung nodules/masses patients. METHODS: All relevant studies in the Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases that were published as of June 2020 were identified. RevMan version 5.3 was used for all data analyses. RESULTS: In total, 9 relevant studies were included in the present meta-analysis. These studies were all retrospective and analyzed outcomes associated with 2175 procedures, including both CT-guided CNB (n = 819) and FNAB (n = 1356) procedures. CNB was associated with significantly higher sample adequacy rates than was FNAB (95.7% vs 85.8%, OR: 0.26; P < .00001), while diagnostic accuracy rates did not differ between these groups (90.1% vs 87.6%, OR: 0.8; P = .46). In addition, no differences in rates of pneumothorax (28.6% vs 23.0%, OR: 1.15; P = .71), hemorrhage (17.3% vs 20.1%, OR: 0.91; P = .62), and chest tube insertion (5.9% vs 4.9%, OR: 1.01; P = .97) were detected between these groups. Significant heterogeneity among included studies was detected for the diagnostic accuracy (I2 = 57%) and pneumothorax (I2 = 77%) endpoints. There were no significant differences between CNB and FNAB with respect to diagnostic accuracy rates for lung nodules (P = .90). In addition, we detected no evidence of significant publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: CT-guided CNB could achieve better sample adequacy than FNAB did during the lung biopsy procedure. However, the CNB did not show any superiorities in items of diagnostic accuracy and safety.