RESUMO
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: There has been increasing scrutiny on the standardization of surgical training in the US. PURPOSE: This study provides case volume benchmarks for Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited orthopedic spine surgery fellowship training. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of fellows at ACGME-accredited orthopedic spine surgery fellowships (2017-2022). PATIENT SAMPLE: N/A. OUTCOME MEASURES: Reported case volume during fellowship training. METHODS: Case volume percentiles were calculated across ACGME-defined case categories and temporal changes assessed via linear regression. Variability between the highest and lowest deciles by case volume was calculated as fold-differences (90th percentile/10th percentile). Sensitivity analyses were performed to identify potential targets for case minimum requirements. RESULTS: A total of 163 spine surgery fellows were included in this study. Total mean reported spine surgery case volume increased from 313.2±122 in 2017 to 382.0±164 in 2022 (p=.19). Most cases were classified as adult (range, 97.2%-98.0%) over pediatric cases (range, 2.0%-2.8%). An average of 322.0 cases were reported and most were classified as laminectomy (32%), posterior arthrodesis (29%), and anterior arthrodesis (20%). Overall variability in total case volume was 2.4 and the greatest variability existed for posterior instrumentation (38.1), application of cage (34.6), anterior instrumentation (20.8), and fractures and dislocations (17.3). If case minimum requirements for total reported cases was assumed at 200 cases, then all spine fellows included in this study would achieve this requirement. However, if case minimum requirements were assumed at 250 total cases, then approximately thirty percent of fellows (n=49) would not achieve this requirement for graduation. CONCLUSIONS: Increasingly, national societies and accrediting bodies for surgical education recognize the need for standardized training. This study provides benchmarks to inform potential case minimum requirements and help reduce variability during spine fellowship training. Future studies are needed to establish case minimum requirements for spine surgery fellowship training across comprehensive and granular case categories that cover the full gamut of orthopedic spine surgery.
Assuntos
Benchmarking , Bolsas de Estudo , Ortopedia , Humanos , Ortopedia/educação , Ortopedia/normas , Bolsas de Estudo/estatística & dados numéricos , Bolsas de Estudo/normas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acreditação/normas , Estudos Transversais , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/normas , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/educação , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/normas , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Internato e Residência/normas , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , FemininoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to define and map subcompetencies required for pediatric cardiac critical care (PCCC) fellowship education and training under the auspices of the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Society (PCICS). We used the 2022 frameworks for PCCC fellowship learning objectives by Tabbutt et al and for entrustable professional activities (EPAs) by Werho et al and integrated new subcompetencies to the EPAs. This complementary update serves to provide a foundation for standardized trainee assessment tools for PCCC. DESIGN: A volunteer panel of ten PCICS members who are fellowship education program directors in cardiac critical care used a modified Delphi method to develop the update and additions to the EPA-based curriculum. In this process, the experts rated information independently, and repetitively after feedback, before reaching consensus. The agreed new EPAs were later reviewed and unanimously accepted by all PCICS program directors in PCCC in the United States and Canada and were endorsed by the PCICS in 2023. PROCEDURE AND MAIN RESULTS: The procedure for defining new subcompetencies to the established EPAs comprised six consecutive steps: 1) literature search; 2) selection of key subcompetencies and curricular components; 3) written questionnaire; 4) consensus meeting and critical evaluation; 5) approval by curriculum developers; and 6) PCICS presentation and endorsement. Overall, 110 subcompetencies from six core-competency domains were mapped to nine EPAs with defined levels of entrustment and examples of simple and complex cases. To facilitate clarity and develop a future assessment tool, three EPAs were subcategorized with subcompetencies mapped to the appropriate subcategory. The latter covering common procedures in the cardiac ICU. CONCLUSIONS: This represents the 2023 update to the PCCC fellowship education and training EPAs with the defining and mapping of 110 subcompetencies to the nine established 2022 EPAs. This goal of this update is to serve as the next step in the integration of EPAs into a standardized competency-based assessment framework for trainees in PCCC.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Cuidados Críticos , Currículo , Técnica Delphi , Bolsas de Estudo , Pediatria , Humanos , Canadá , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Estados Unidos , Currículo/normas , Competência Clínica/normas , Bolsas de Estudo/normas , Pediatria/educação , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/normas , Cardiologia/educação , Educação Baseada em Competências/métodos , Sociedades MédicasRESUMO
ABSTRACT: Recent events have ignited widespread attention to structural racism and implicit bias throughout the U.S. health care system and medical institutions, resulting in a call for antiracism approaches to advance health equity. Medical education leaders are well positioned to advance health equity, not only through their training of fellows, residents, and medical students, but also in their approach to scholarship. Education scholarship drives innovation and critical evaluation of current practices; it impacts and intersects with multiple factors that have the potential to reduce health inequities. Thus, it is critical to prioritize the assessment of education scholarship through a health equity lens. Medical education scholarly dissemination has markedly expanded over the past 2 to 3 decades, yet medical educators have continued to embrace Boyer's and Glassick and colleagues' definitions of scholarship. The authors propose an approach to medical education scholarship assessment that expands each of Glassick's 6 existing criteria to address health inequities and adds health equity as a seventh criterion. With this, medical educators, researchers, reviewers, and others can consider how education scholarship affects diverse populations and settings, direct educational products and scholarship to address health inequities, and raise the importance of advancing health equity in medical education scholarship. By expanding and standardizing the assessment of scholarship to incorporate health equity, the medical education community can foster a cultural shift that brings health equity to the forefront of education scholarship.
Assuntos
Educação Médica , Equidade em Saúde , Humanos , Educação Médica/normas , Estados Unidos , Bolsas de Estudo/normas , Racismo/prevenção & controleAssuntos
Emprego , Bolsas de Estudo , Direitos Humanos , Internato e Residência , Sindicatos , Médicos , Emprego/organização & administração , Emprego/normas , Bolsas de Estudo/organização & administração , Bolsas de Estudo/normas , Direitos Humanos/normas , Humanos , Internato e Residência/organização & administração , Internato e Residência/normas , Sindicatos/organização & administração , Médicos/organização & administração , Médicos/normas , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Over the past three decades, cardiac electrophysiology and pacing, including device therapy and catheter ablation of arrhythmias, has rapidly developed as a subspecialty in cardiology. Currently, there is no clear perception about the needs in cardiac electrophysiology and pacing among early-career cardiologists. METHODS: To address these concerns, the Young Committee of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing (AIAC) carried out a survey among those under the age of 40 years to obtain detailed information on practical activities and formal lessons during the fellowship in cardiology and their satisfaction and proficiency level at the end of the fellowship. RESULTS: We obtained 334 answers to the survey. In invasive cardiac electrophysiology and pacing, the percentage of participants attending the activity for a longer time (3-6 months) is lower compared with those in noninvasive subspecialties. About 40% of participants did not receive lessons on interventional cardiology, cardiac electrophysiology and pacing. On the contrary, 71% of participants received an adequate number of lessons on clinical arrhythmology. The vast majority of the participants expressed satisfaction for the education received in the echocardiographic, cardiac interventional laboratories and clinical arrhythmology, but about half of the participants were unsatisfied with the education received in cardiac electrophysiology and pacing. In interventional arrhythmology, the majority of the participants declare their lack of proficiency with two peaks for more complex procedures, namely interventional electrophysiology procedures (82%) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) procedures (76%). CONCLUSION: The present survey among Italian early-career cardiologists suggests that the majority of participants consider themselves not confident in performing cardiac electrophysiology and pacing procedures. Due to the complexity of the treatment for heart rhythm disorders and the long learning curve, structured additional training in cardiac electrophysiology and pacing procedures is required after cardiology fellowship.
Assuntos
Eletrofisiologia Cardíaca/educação , Cardiologia , Competência Clínica/normas , Educação , Cardiologia/educação , Cardiologia/métodos , Educação/métodos , Educação/normas , Bolsas de Estudo/métodos , Bolsas de Estudo/normas , Humanos , Itália , Avaliação das Necessidades , Sociedades Médicas , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosAssuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Docentes de Medicina/educação , Bolsas de Estudo , Gastroenterologistas/educação , Gastroenterologia/educação , Transplante de Fígado/educação , Competência Clínica/normas , Consenso , Currículo/normas , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/normas , Escolaridade , Docentes de Medicina/normas , Bolsas de Estudo/normas , Gastroenterologistas/normas , Gastroenterologia/normas , Humanos , Transplante de Fígado/normas , Desenvolvimento de ProgramasAssuntos
COVID-19 , Técnicas Cosméticas/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Dermatológicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Bolsas de Estudo , Assistência ao Convalescente/estatística & dados numéricos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Dermatológicos/educação , Dermatologia/educação , Educação a Distância , Emprego/estatística & dados numéricos , Bolsas de Estudo/normas , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Sociedades Médicas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados UnidosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Cytopathology (CYP) fellowship training is a critical component of maintaining a skilled group of cytopathologists. For years, the recruitment process for CYP fellowship programs has remained unchanged, with individual programs outlining their own requirements and timeline, and applicants bearing the cost of travel and dealing with the variable processes outlined by individual programs. However, there has been renewed interest in analyzing the recruitment process for CYP fellowships to look for areas of potential improvement and uniformity. METHODS: With the goal of gauging the interest of CYP fellowship program directors (PDs) in a more unified approach to recruitment or a formal match process, the ASC Cytopathology Program Directors Committee (CPDC) surveyed PDs via SurveyMonkey and organized special webinars with polling over a 4-year time frame (2017-2021), and examined Qualtrics survey data collected by the American Board of Pathology (ABPath) in 2020. RESULTS: The response rate for PDs was greatest in a formal survey by the ABPath (66 respondents; 71% of PDs) conducted in 2020, and lower for an ASC survey in 2021 (61 respondents, 66% of PDs) and 2017 (19 respondents; 21% of PDs) and two recent ASC webinars (10 and 26 respondents; 11% and 28% of PDs). Support for a fellowship match process varied from 29% to 77%, respondent uncertainty ranged from 13% to 50%, and a lack of support ranged from 10% to 60%. In aggregate, approximately 56% of respondents would be in favor of a more standardized process. Recently, after hearing about other fellowships experimenting with a standardized process, the interest in a unified approach doubled from approximately 29% to 60%, and the percentage of PDs with uncertainty decreased from 50% to 26%. In the most recent follow up survey, interest reached the highest level of 77% among PDs. CONCLUSIONS: Herein we present several years of feedback from the CYP fellowship PD community regarding a more standardized approach to CYP fellowship recruitment, culminating in the latest survey with 77% of CYP fellowship PDs expressing interest. Thus, details about what a unified timeframe may look like for CYP fellowships is presented to show how this may improve the recruitment process for the mutual benefit for programs and applicants.
Assuntos
Biologia Celular/educação , Técnicas Citológicas , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Bolsas de Estudo/normas , Patologistas/educação , Patologia/educação , Seleção de Pessoal/normas , Biópsia , Certificação , Competência Clínica , Currículo , Humanos , Especialização , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In academia, many institutions use journal article publication productivity for making decisions on tenure and promotion, funding grants, and rewarding stellar scholars. Although non-alphabetical sequencing of article coauthoring by the spelling of surnames signals the extent to which a scholar has contributed to a project, many disciplines in academia follow the norm of alphabetical ordering of coauthors in journal publications. By assessing business academic publications, this study investigates the hypothesis that author alphabetical ordering disincentivizes teamwork and reduces the overall quality of scholarship. METHODS: To address our objectives, we accessed data from 21,353 articles published over a 20-year period across the four main business subdisciplines. The articles selected are all those published by the four highest-ranked journals (in each year) and four lower-ranked journals (in each year) for accounting, business technology, marketing, and organizational behavior. Poisson regression and binary logistic regression were utilized for hypothesis testing. RESULTS: This study finds that, although team size among business scholars is increasing over time, alphabetical ordering as a convention in journal article publishing disincentivizes author teamwork. This disincentive results in fewer authors per publication than for publications using contribution-based ordering of authors. Importantly, article authoring teamwork is related to article quality. Specifically, articles written by a single author typically are of lesser quality than articles published by coauthors, but the number of coauthors exhibits decreasing returns to scale-coauthoring teams of one to three are positively related to high-quality articles, but larger teams are not. Alphabetical ordering itself, however, is positively associated with quality even though it inhibits teamwork, but journal article coauthoring has a greater impact on article quality than does alphabetical ordering. CONCLUSIONS: These findings have important implications for academia. Scholars respond to incentives, yet alphabetical ordering of journal article authors conflicts with what is beneficial for the progress of academic disciplines. Based on these findings, we recommend that, to drive the highest-quality research, teamwork should be incentivized-all fields should adopt a contribution-based journal article author-ordering convention and avoid author ordering based upon the spelling of surnames. Although this study was undertaken using articles from business journals, its findings should generalize across all academia.
Assuntos
Autoria/normas , Editoração/normas , Bolsas de Estudo/normas , Organização do Financiamento/normas , Humanos , Fator de Impacto de Revistas , Idioma , Nomes , Organizações/normas , Projetos de Pesquisa/normas , Redação/normasRESUMO
I begin with my impressions of a narrative of redemption that is caught up in the formation of new environmental, social, and political aspirations for the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. I then reflect on, first, pre-pandemic scholarship on "biosecurity" and, second, taking up a variation of the syndemic approach to understanding the COVID-19 pandemic. I end by arguing that we should not expect to live with "new normals" for living in a post-COVID-19 world that leaves intact "old normals" that have historically contributed to the rise of anthropogenic environmental harms and inegalitarian social arrangements in the world today.
Assuntos
COVID-19/psicologia , Bolsas de Estudo , Saúde/normas , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/transmissão , Bolsas de Estudo/métodos , Bolsas de Estudo/organização & administração , Bolsas de Estudo/normas , Saúde/ética , Saúde/tendências , HumanosAssuntos
Medicina Bariátrica/educação , Cirurgia Bariátrica/educação , Bolsas de Estudo/normas , Gastroenterologia/educação , Obesidade/terapia , Medicina Bariátrica/normas , Cirurgia Bariátrica/normas , Bariatria/normas , Competência Clínica , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/normas , Endoscopia/educação , Ética Clínica , Humanos , Obesidade/diagnóstico , Profissionalismo , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The majority of liver transplantations (LTs) in North America are performed by transplant surgery fellows with attending surgeon supervision. Although a strict case volume requirement is mandatory for graduating fellows, no guidelines exist on providing constructive feedback to trainees during fellowship. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of all adult LTs performed by abdominal transplant surgery fellows at a single American Society of Transplant Surgeons-accredited academic institution from 2005 to 2019 was conducted. Data from the most recent 5 fellows were averaged to generate reference learning curves for 8 variables representing operative efficiency (ie total operative time, warm ischemia time, and cold ischemia time) and surgical outcomes (ie intraoperative blood loss, unplanned return to the operating room, biliary complication, vascular complication, and patient/graft loss). Data for newer fellows were plotted against the reference curves at 3-month intervals to provide an objective assessment measure. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-two adult LTs were performed by 5 fellows during the study period. Mean patient age was 56 years; 67% were male; and mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score at transplantation was 22. For the 8 primary variables, mean values included the following: total operative time 330 minutes, warm ischemia time 28 minutes, cold ischemia time 288 minutes, intraoperative blood loss 1.59 L, biliary complication 19.6%, unplanned return to operating room 19.3%, and vascular complication 2.3%. A structure for feedback to fellows was developed using a printed report card and through in-person meetings with faculty at 3-month intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Comparative feedback using institution-specific reference curves can provide valuable objective data on progression of individual fellows. It can aid in the timely identification of areas in need of improvement, which enhances the quality of training and has the potential to improve patient care and transplantation outcomes.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Avaliação Educacional , Bolsas de Estudo/normas , Falência Hepática/cirurgia , Transplante de Fígado/educação , Transplante de Fígado/normas , Adulto , Competência Clínica/normas , Eficiência , Feedback Formativo , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Interpersonal communication skills and professionalism competencies are difficult to assess among nephrology trainees. We developed a formative "Breaking Bad News" simulation and implemented a study in which nephrology fellows were assessed with regard to their skills in providing counseling to simulated patients confronting the need for kidney replacement therapy (KRT) or kidney biopsy. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study of communication competency in the setting of preparing for KRT for kidney failure, for KRT for acute kidney injury (AKI), or for kidney biopsy. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 58 first- and second-year nephrology fellows assessed during 71 clinical evaluation sessions at 8 training programs who participated in an objective structured clinical examination of simulated patients in 2017 and 2018. PREDICTORS: Fellowship training year and clinical scenario. OUTCOME: Primary outcome was the composite score for the "overall rating" item on the Essential Elements of Communication-Global Rating Scale 2005 (EEC-GRS), as assessed by simulated patients. Secondary outcomes were the score for EEC-GRS "overall rating" item for each scenario, score < 3 for any EEC-GRS item, Mini-Clinical Examination Exercise (Mini-CEX) score < 3 on at least 1 item (as assessed by faculty), and faculty and fellow satisfaction with simulation exercise (via a survey they completed). ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Nonparametric tests of hypothesis comparing performance by fellowship year (primary goal) and scenario. RESULTS: Composite scores for EEC-GRS overall rating item were not significantly different between fellowship years (P = 0.2). Only 4 of 71 fellow evaluations had an unsatisfactory score for the EEC-GRS overall rating item on any scenario. On Mini-CEX, 17% scored < 3 on at least 1 item in the kidney failure scenario; 37% and 53% scored < 3 on at least 1 item in the AKI and kidney biopsy scenarios, respectively. In the survey, 96% of fellows and 100% of faculty reported the learning objectives were met and rated the experience good or better in 3 survey rating questions. LIMITATIONS: Relatively brief time for interactions; limited familiarity with and training of simulated patients in use of EEC-GRS. CONCLUSIONS: The fellows scored highly on the EEC-GRS regardless of their training year, suggesting interpersonal communication competency is achieved early in training. The fellows did better with the kidney failure scenario than with the AKI and kidney biopsy scenarios. Structured simulated clinical examinations may be useful to inform curricular choices and may be a valuable assessment tool for communication and professionalism.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica/normas , Simulação por Computador/normas , Internato e Residência/normas , Nefrologia/normas , Relações Médico-Paciente , Terapia de Substituição Renal/normas , Adulto , Comunicação , Bolsas de Estudo/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Nefropatias/psicologia , Nefropatias/terapia , Masculino , Nefrologia/educação , Estudos Prospectivos , Terapia de Substituição Renal/psicologiaRESUMO
The number of Americans affected by diabetes continues to increase but the number of endocrinologists with specialty training to treat this population has not kept up with demand. Primary care outpatient visits can also not meet the projected diabetes population demands or the needs for other complex diabetes management issues. Treatments for diabetes including both medications and technologies continue to expand and become more complex. In response to these challenges there have been primary care physicians seeking specialized training to become diabetologists. This can fill some of the gaps left by a lack of resources in the U.S. healthcare system.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Educação Médica/organização & administração , Bolsas de Estudo/organização & administração , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Acreditação , Diabetes Mellitus/economia , Bolsas de Estudo/economia , Bolsas de Estudo/normas , Humanos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Estados UnidosRESUMO
As the SARS-COV-2 pandemic created the need for social distancing and the implementation of nonessential travel bans, residency and fellowship programs have moved toward a web-based virtual process for applicant interviews. As part of the Society of Asian Academic Surgeons 5th Annual Meeting, an expert panel was convened to provide guidance for prospective applicants who are new to the process. This article provides perspectives from applicants who have successfully navigated the surgical subspecialty fellowship process, as well as program leadership who have held virtual interviews.