The mean Hounsfield unit range acquired from different slices produces superior predictive accuracy for pyonephrosis in obstructive uropathy.

PURPOSE: To determine the non-contrast computer tomography imaging features of pyonephrosis and evaluate the predictive value of Hounsfield units (HUs) in different hydronephrotic region slices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from patients with hydronephrosis who had renal-ureteral calculi. All patients were categorized into pyonephrosis and simple hydronephrosis groups. Baseline characteristics, the mean HU values in the maximal hydronephrotic region (uHU) slice, and the range of uHU in different slices (ΔuHU) were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for pyonephrosis. RESULTS: Among the 181 patients enrolled in the current study, 71 patients (39.2%) were diagnosed with pyonephrosis. The mean dilated pelvis surface areas were comparable between patients with pyonephrosis and simple hydronephrosis (822.61 mm² vs. 877.23 mm², p=0.722). Collecting system debris (p=0.022), a higher uHU (p=0.038), and a higher ΔuHU (p<0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for pyonephrosis based on multivariate analysis. The ΔuHU sensitivity and specificity were 88.7% and 86.4%, respectively, at a cutoff value of 6.56 (p<0.001), whereas the sensitivity and specificity for detecting pyonephrosis at a uHU cutoff value of 7.96 was 50.7% and 70.9%, respectively (p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Non-contrast computer tomography was shown to accurately distinguish simple hydronephrosis from pyonephrosis in patients with obstructive uropathy. Evaluation of the ΔuHU in different slices may be more reliable than the uHU acquired from a single slice in predicting pyonephrosis.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: retrospective study on possible predictors of treatment success and revisiting the role of non-contrast-enhanced computer tomography in kidney and ureteral stone disease.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a safe and efficient treatment option for urinary stone disease. The overall stone-free rate (SFR) varies significantly. This study aimed to assess the influence of stone size, location, stone density, and skin-to-stone distance (SSD), on the outcome of ESWL. We assessed whether pre-treatment non-contrast-enhanced CT scan (NCCT) confers significant advantages compared to kidney-ureter-bladder film (KUB) only. We reviewed the medical records of 307 cases (165 men, 142 women) with renal and ureteral stones treated consecutively at our institution with ESWL between 2020 and 2023. 44 of these underwent a NCCT. The outcome of ESWL was defined in two ways: visible stone fragmentation on KUB, and the need for further treatment. Overall success of fragmentation was 85% (261 patients). 61% of patients (n = 184) didn't need any further treatment. Stone size and location correlated significantly with treatment outcomes regarding the need for further treatment (p = 0.004) and stone fragmentation (p = 0.016), respectively. Unlike mean SSD (p = 0.462), the mean attenuation value (MAV) significantly correlated with the need for retreatment (p = 0.016). MAV seems to be a better predictor of treatment success (AUC of the ROC curve: 0.729), compared to stone size (AUC: 0.613). The difference between groups (with and without NCCT) in both treatment outcomes did not reach statistical significance. During decision-making, information regarding SSD and MAV can be useful in more dubious scenarios. However, it appears that their inclusion doesn't provide substantial advantages when compared to relying solely on KUB.

Predictive role of ureteral wall thickness and patient characteristics in endoscopic treatment outcomes for ureteral stricture disease following stone surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of certain radiological parameters and patient characteristics in predicting the success of endoscopic treatment in ureteral stricture disease. METHODS: Fifty one adult patients with ureteral stricture disease (< 1 cm) after developing due to upper ureteral stones with ureteroscopic laser disintegration were included and in addition to stone and patient parameters, radiological parameters including ureteral wall thickness (UWT) at the impacted stone site were also measured on computed tomography (CT) images. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1: Patients with endoscopic treatment success and Group 2: Patients with endoscopic treatment failure. The possible relationship between the UWT values and other radiological parameter was comparatively evaluated. RESULTS: Mean UWT value assessed at the treated stone site was significantly higher in cases unresponsive to endoscopic treatment with values of 2.77 ± 1.03 mm and 4.25 ± 1.32 mm in Group 1 and 2 respectively. A cut off value 3.55 mm for UWT was found to be highly predictive for endoscopic treatment failure. CONCLUSIONS: Our current results indicated that assessment of UWT value at the obstructing stone could be helpful enough to predict the likelihood of failure following endoscopic management of strictures with high sensitivity and specificity. Evaluation of this particular parameter could let the endourologists to look for more rational treatment alternatives with necessary measures taken on time.

Advancements in Uric Acid Stone Detection: Integrating Deep Learning with CT Imaging and Clinical Assessments in the Upper Urinary Tract.

INTRODUCTION: Among upper urinary tract stones, a significant proportion comprises uric acid stones. The aim of this study was to use machine learning techniques to analyze CT scans and blood and urine test data, with the aim of establishing multiple predictive models that can accurately identify uric acid stones. METHODS: We divided 276 patients with upper urinary tract stones into two groups: 48 with uric acid stones and 228 with other types, identified using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. To distinguish the stone types, we created three types of deep learning models and extensively compared their classification performance. RESULTS: Among the three major types of models, considering accuracy, sensitivity, and recall, CLNC-LR, IMG-support vector machine (SVM), and FUS-SVM perform the best. The accuracy and F1 score for the three models were as follows: CLNC-LR (82.14%, 0.7813), IMG-SVM (89.29%, 0.89), and FUS-SVM (29.29%, 0.8818). The area under the curves for classes CLNC-LR, IMG-SVM, and FUS-SVM were 0.97, 0.96, and 0.99, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study shows the feasibility of utilizing deep learning to assess whether urinary tract stones are uric acid stones through CT scans, blood, and urine tests. It can serve as a supplementary tool for traditional stone composition analysis, offering decision support for urologists and enhancing the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment.

Ureteral wall thickness as a predictor for non-invasive treatment success for steinstrasse. Can we save time?

PURPOSE: We aimed to define factors affecting the non-invasive overall treatment success (medical expulsive therapy (MET) ± shock wave lithotripsy (SWL)) for uncomplicated ureteral steinstrasse (SS) clearance. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients who underwent SWL for renal stones between 2017 and 2021. Patients with uncomplicated SS were included. All patient's demographic and radiological data, e.g., age, gender, pre-SWL stenting, SS site, type, leading stone size in widest diameter (< 10 mm and ≥ 10 mm), ureteral wall thickness (UWT) in mm against the leading stone were collected. If SS was diagnosed, medical treatment was given for 4 weeks. In case of MET failure, either SWL for the leading stones + MET or direct URS was done. Non-invasive treatment success (SFR) was considered if complete clearance of SS occurred with no complications or the need for invasive intervention. RESULTS: A total of 145 patients were included with mean age of 45.9 ± 12.4 years. SFR in case of MET only occurred in 27.9%. Complications happened in 26 patients (17.9%). Non-invasive treatment SFR was achieved in 78 patients (53.8%) totally where SS type I, leading stone size ≤ 10 mm type and decreased UWT around the leading stone increased treatment success. CONCLUSION: Ureteral wall thickness is an important factor predicting SS management success. Besides the decreased UWT, non-invasive management should be offered for type I SS with leading stone ≤ 10 mm.

Deciding on a novel predictive value to gauge how well patients with lower ureteric stones respond to medical expulsive therapy.

This study, conducted over 4 years in Baghdad, Iraq, aimed to determine the importance of ureteric jet assessment in medical expulsive therapy (MET) for distal ureteral stones. A total of 156 patients with distal ureteral stones (≤ 10 mm) participated, and their ureteric jets were observed using a color Doppler scanner before and after 2 weeks of MET. The main focus was the success rate of stone expulsion. Our results showed that 50% of patients had detectable ureteric jets after 2 weeks of MET, and 21.8% experienced successful stone expulsion. After 4 weeks, 23.7% achieved stone expulsion, while 54.5% still had remaining stones. Patients who had a positive baseline ureteric jet were significantly more likely to successfully expel their stones. This study highlights the importance of monitoring ureteric jet movement in MET for distal ureteral stones.

Comparison of ureteral stone measurements for predicting the efficacy of a single session of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: one-, two-, and three-dimensional computed tomography measurements.

The objective of this study was to compare the value of one-, two- and three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) measurements for predicting the efficacy of a single session of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in patients with a single ureteral stone. A total of 165 patients were included based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Different models were constructed using a combination of patients' clinical data and measurements obtained by manual sketching and automated extraction software. Multivariate logistic regression was used to develop the models. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess the performance of the models. There was good interobserver agreement for all measurements in different dimensions (P < 0.001). We also found that hydronephrosis, the largest diameter, the largest area, volume, and mean CT value were significantly greater in the failure group than in the success group (P < 0.01). Furthermore, all sizes and CT measurement values were found to be independent predictors for predicting efficacy after one session of ESWL (P < 0.05). In addition, the multivariate logistic analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for two-dimensional and three-dimensional measurements was superior to that of one-dimensional measurement (P < 0.01). However, when size alone was included as a measurable predictor, there was no significant difference in the AUC among the one-, two-, and three-dimensional measurements (P > 0.05). In summary, after adjusting for clinical data, two- and three-dimensional measurements combining ureteral stone size and CT values were found to be the best predictors of ESWL efficacy, and software-based three-dimensional measurements should be considered to avoid interobserver variability in clinical practice.

Ureteral stricture formation after endoscopic removal of obstructing stones: could it be predicted with well-assessed radiological parameters?

The possible role of well-assessed radiological parameters in the prediction of ureteral stricture formation in cases with impacted obstructive ureteral calculi has been evaluated. 46 adult patients with or without ureteral stricture formation after ureteroscopic stone management were included. In addition to stone size and some certain radiological parameters including ureteral wall thickness (UWT) of the involved ureter at the impacted stone site was also measured and noted on computed tomography (CT) images. Parameters were evaluated in two subgroups of cases, namely: Group 1: patients in whom a ureteral stricture formed after endoscopic stone removal and Group 2: patients normal ureteral anatomy without any stricture formation. The possible relationship between the UWT values and degree of hydronephrosis (HN) with subsequent stricture formation was comparatively evaluated. All of the stones were proximal ureteral calculi in both groups. Both the degree of HN and proximal ureteral diameter (PUD) parenchymal was higher in cases with stricture formation. In addition, mean parenchymal thickness was lower and mean values of UWT measurements at the stone site were 3.70 ± 0.97 mm and 2.17 ± 0.26 mm in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. A cutoff value 2.49 mm for UWT was found to be highly predictive for stricture formation. UWT value calculated at the obstructing stone site was found to be predictive enough for the likelihood of ureteral stricture formation with high sensitivity and specificity . This evaluation along with some other radiological parameters may enable the urologists to follow such cases on this aspect with necessary measures taken.

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of ultra low-dose computed tomography and X-ray of the kidneys, ureters and bladder for urolithiasis in the follow-up setting.

INTRODUCTION: Urolithiasis is frequently followed up with a low-dose computed tomography of the kidneys ureters and bladder (LD-CTKUB) with doses typically less than 3 millisieverts. Although X-ray is a lower dose (0.5-1.1 mSv) alternative for follow up, it has lower diagnostic accuracy and is limited to radiopaque calculi. This study aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy of sub-millisievert ultra-low dose CT (ULD-CTKUB) against X-ray KUB for the follow up of urolithiasis when both are compared against the standard of care of a low-dose CT KUB (LD-CTKUB). METHODS: This prospective study included patients with a known diagnosis of urolithiasis on prior CTKUB presenting for follow up. Each patient underwent a repeat reference LD-CTKUB, ULD-CTKUB and X-ray KUB. All imaging studies were interpreted by three readers. The radiation dose and quantitative noise was calculated for each CT. Both CT and X-ray were assessed for the presence, number and size of all calculi ≥2 mm. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients were included in this study. LD-CTKUB identified 197 calculi. ULD-CTKUB in our study had a mean effective dose of 0.5 mSv compared to X-ray KUB where doses range in the literature from 0.5 to 1.1 mSv. Per-patient pooled analysis for intrarenal calculi when comparing ULD-CTKUB versus X-ray KUB against a reference LD-CTKUB found a sensitivity of 90% versus 67% (P < 0.01) and specificity of 93% versus 98% (P = 0.18) respectively. For ureteric calculi, the sensitivity was 67% versus 33% (P < 0.01) and specificity 94% versus 94% (P = 1.00) respectively. Per-stone pooled analysis detection rate was 79% for ULD-CTKUB versus 48% for X-ray (P < 0.01) when each was compared to the reference LD-CTKUB. Interobserver agreement was high for intrarenal calculi and moderate for ureteric calculi. CONCLUSION: Sub-millisievert ULD-CTKUB had lower doses and higher sensitivity than X-ray in patients requiring follow up of known urolithiasis.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of either or both mirabegron and silodosin, as a medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteric stones.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy and safety of either or both silodosin and mirabegron as MET for distal ureteric stones ≤ 10 mm. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study enrolled a total of 105 patients, aged between 20 and 56 years, diagnosed by single radiopaque distal ureteral stone measuring ≤ 10 mm. The recruitment period spanned from May 2020 to December 2021. The patients were randomly divided into three groups, with each group consisting of 35 participants. Group A received a once-daily dose of 8 mg of silodosin, group B received a once-daily dose of 50 mg of mirabegron, and group C received a combination of both medications. Treatment was administered to all patients until the stone was expelled or for a maximum duration of four weeks. The stone-free rate was determined by analyzing KUB films with or without ultrasonography. RESULTS: The rate of stone expulsion was significantly higher in group C compared to groups A and B (P = 0.04 and P = 0.004, respectively). The mean (standard deviation) time for stone expulsion in groups A, B, and C was 14 ± 2.3 days, 11 ± 3.1 days, and 7 ± 2.2 days, respectively. Group C demonstrated a significantly shorter stone expulsion time compared to groups A and B (P = 0.001 and P = 0.04, respectively). The frequency of renal colic in group C was significantly lower than that in groups A and B, resulting in a reduced requirement for analgesics (P < 0.05). Anejaculation occurred at a significantly higher rate in the silodosin group (73.9%) and combination group (84%) compared to the mirabegron group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that both silodosin and mirabegron are effective treatments for the expulsion of lower ureteric stones. Furthermore, the combination of these medications leads to an increased rate of stone expulsion and a reduced duration of expulsion.

AI prediction of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for ureteral stones by machine learning-based analysis with a variety of stone and patient characteristics.

We propose an artificial intelligence prediction method for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment outcomes by analysis of a wide variety of variables. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 171 patients from between January 2009 and November 2019 that underwent shock wave lithotripsy at Wakayama Medical University, Japan, for ureteral stones shown on preoperative non-contrast computed tomography. This prediction method consisted of stone area extraction, stone analyzing factor extraction from non-contrast computed tomography images, and shock wave lithotripsy treatment result prediction by a non-linear support vector machine for analysis of 15 input and automatic measurement factors. Input factors included patient age, skin-to-stone distance, and maximum ureteral wall thickness, and the automatic measurement factors included 11 non-contrast computed tomography image texture factors in the stone area and stone volume. Permutation feature importance was also applied to the artificial intelligence prediction results to analyze the importance of each factor relating to estimate decision grounds. The prediction performance was evaluated by five-fold cross-validation, it obtained 0.742 of the mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The proposed method is shown by these results to have robust data diversity and effective clinical application. As a result of permutation feature importance, some factors that showed high p-values in the significant difference tests were thought to have a high contribution to the proposed prediction method. Future issues include validation using a larger volume of high-resolution clinical non-contrast computed tomography image data and the application of deep learning.

Models to predict the surgical outcome of mini-ECIRS (endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery) for renal and/or ureteral stones.

To establish a safer and more efficient treatment strategy with mini-endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS), the present study aimed to develop models to predict the outcomes of mini-ECIRS in patients with renal and/or ureteral stones. We retrospectively analysed consecutive patients with renal and/or ureteral stones who underwent mini-ECIRS at three Japanese tertiary institutions. Final treatment outcome was evaluated by CT imaging at 1 month postoperatively and stone free (SF) was defined as completely no residual stone or residual stone fragments ≤ 2 mm. Three prognostic models (multiple logistic regression, classification tree analysis, and machine learning-based random forest) were developed to predict surgical outcomes using preoperative clinical factors. Clinical data from 1432 ECIRS were pooled from a database registered at three institutions, and 996 single sessions of mini-ECIRS were analysed in this study. The overall SF rate was 62.3%. The multiple logistic regression model consisted of stone burden (P < 0.001), number of involved calyces (P < 0.001), nephrostomy prior to mini-ECIRS (P = 0.091), and ECOG-PS (P = 0.110), wherein the area under the curve (AUC) was 70.7%. The classification tree analysis consisted of the number of involved calyces with an AUC of 61.7%. The random forest model showed that the top predictive variable was the number of calyces involved, with an AUC of 91.9%. Internal validation revealed that the AUCs for the multiple logistic regression model, classification tree analysis and random forest models were 70.4, 69.6 and 85.9%, respectively. The number of involved calyces, and a smaller stone burden implied a SF outcome. The machine learning-based model showed remarkably high accuracy and may be a promising tool for physicians and patients to obtain proper consent, avoid inefficient surgery, and decide preoperatively on the most efficient treatment strategies, including staged mini-ECIRS.

Factors influencing the efficacy of ultrasound-guided extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral stones: a retrospective study.

The aim of the study was to analyze the factors influencing the efficacy of ultrasound-guided extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the treatment of ureteral stones. The clinical data of 8102 patients (6083 men and 2019 women) who presented with ureteral stones were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients were treated with ultrasound-guided ESWL. The stone-free rate (SFR) was calculated to evaluate the effect of ESWL. The characteristics of the patients and their stones, and the ESWL parameters applied were compared to identify the factors affecting the treatment outcomes. The SFR and that following one ESWL session were 94.6% (7663/8102) and 75.4% (6107/8102), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that stone location (OR 0.656, p < 0.001), stone size (OR 1.103, p < 0.001), and degree of hydronephrosis (OR 1.952, p < 0.001) independently affected SFR; and age (OR 1.005, p = 0.022), stone location (OR 0.729, p < 0.001), stone size (OR 1.103, p < 0.001), degree of hydronephrosis (OR 1.387, p = 0.001), maximum energy level(OR 0.691, p < 0.001) independently affected SFR following one session. Ultrasound-guided ESWL is effective in all levels of ureteral stones. Large stone size and moderate hydronephrosis are correlated with treatment failure. Ultrasound-guided ESWL may be the first choice for distal ureteral stones.

Development of a new scoring system predicting medical expulsive therapy success on 4-10 mm distal ureteral stones: medical expulsive therapy stone score (METSS).

Ureteral stone passage by using medical expulsive therapy (MET) are affected by numerous radiological and clinical parameters. We aimed to construct a scoring system, which would be based on clinical and computed tomography (CT)-derived data, to predict the success of the MET approach. 186 patients presenting to urology clinic or emergency department with unilateral single 4-10 mm distal ureteral stone and who had MET were included. All patients were divided into two groups as the MET-successful group and the MET-unsuccessful group. The success rate of MET was 67.2%. Stone size ≥ 6.5 mm, stone density > 1078 HU, ureteral wall thickness (UWT) > 2.31 mm, ureteral diameter (UD) > 9.24 mm, presence of periureteral stranding (PUS) and presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) were stated as the independent risk factors. Based on the regression coefficients on multivariate logistic regression analysis, 1 point for stone size > 6.5 mm, 2 points for stone density > 1078 HU, 2 points for UWT > 2.31 mm, 3 points for UD > 9.24 mm, 1 point for presence of PUS and 1 point for presence of DM were assigned to patients for each risk factor. Higher medical expulsive therapy stone score (METSS) indicated lower MET success. All patients were classified into three risk groups according to METSS: low risk (0-3 points; success percentage: 92.8%); intermediate risk (4-5 points; success percentage: 60.4%) and high risk (6-10 points; success percentage: 8.3%). The METSS seems to separate successfully the patients with a favorable or adverse constellation of factors.

Accuracy of Radiology Reports for Obstructing Ureteral Stone Size in the Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the number of dimensions of obstructing ureteral stones in the emergency department (ED) described in present-day radiology computed tomography reports and assess for measurement discrepancies between radiologist and urologist review. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective study of patients who presented to the ED with unilateral, solitary, obstructing ureteral stones from March 2018 to March 2021. Stone size in each reported dimension recorded by the radiologist was extracted from the chart and then compared to size independently measured by one of our urologists for all 3 stone dimensions. Our primary outcome was the number of stone dimensions included in the radiology report. RESULTS: In total, 181 patients were included for analysis. 82.3% of radiology reports described the stone in one dimension, 15% in two dimensions, and 2.7% in three dimensions. There was a significant difference in median maximal stone size between radiologist and urologist measurement (5.5 vs 6.5 mm, respectively, P < .001). One hundred fourteen stones (62%) had the maximal measurement recorded in the craniocaudal (CC) dimension by urologist review. Only 26% of radiology reports had the CC measurement included in the radiology report. CONCLUSION: Ureteral stone size in a present-day ED cohort is still frequently measured in only 1 or 2 dimensions. In many cases, this is associated with an absence of a reported CC measurement. Inadequate characterization of stone size may affect acute management. This study hopes to encourage reporting of all three dimensions of obstructing ureteral stones in the ED setting for improvements in patient management.

Endoscopic stone management in an ectopic ureter inserting into the prostatic urethra.

We report a case of successful endoscopic stone management in a patient with ectopic ureteric insertion. The patient had a complete duplex collecting system, with the upper moiety ureter inserting ectopically into his prostatic urethra, and an obstructing ureteric stone in the distal portion of the ectopic ureter. This made both characterisation of the patient's anatomy and initial emergency stone management challenging.The case offers several learning points for clinicians who may encounter similar situations. By describing the challenges of managing this patient's presentation, we highlight considerations in imaging interpretation and operative approach that may help the reader manage a similar presentation to their practice. Additionally, we remind the urologist to consider the implications of an ectopic duplex ureter on future procedures, such as transurethral resection of the prostate or radical prostatectomy.

Medial deviation of the ureter is a new sign that could predict stone impaction: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value medial deviation of the ureter at site of ureteric stone as a sign of ureteric stone impaction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All cases with medial deviation of the ureter at site of ureteric stones in our department over 4 years were enrolled in this pilot study. All cases were diagnosed with KUB and non-contrast CT (NCCT). Radiological and ureteroscopic findings were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients with a single impacted stone in the proximal and middle third of the ureter were included in the study. Medial deviation of the ureter at the site of the stone was detected in the upper third of the ureter in 24 (75%) cases and in the middle third in 8 (25%) cases. There were mucosal polyps and mucosal erythema (inflammatory changes) seen by ureteroscopy in all cases (100%). Ureteroscopy was successfully completed with stone fragmentation in 23 (71.8%) patients: 8 of them needed ureteric catheter and 15 required JJ stent insertion. Failure of ureteroscopy with insertion of JJ stent was done in 5 (15.6%) patients. Removal of the stent and ureteroscopy was done after 4 weeks. CONCLUSION: We conclude from this study that medial deviation of the ureter is a new reliable radiological sign of ureteric stone impaction.

Ureteral Wall Thickness Is an Effective Predictor of Ureteral Stone Impaction and Management Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Ureteral stone impaction is associated with unfavorable endourological outcomes; however, reliable predictors of stone impaction are limited. We aimed to assess the performance of ureteral wall thickness on noncontrast computed tomography as a predictor of ureteral stone impaction and failure rates of spontaneous stone passage, shock wave lithotripsy, and retrograde guidewire and stent passage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was completed in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. A search was conducted in April 2022 for all adult, human, and English language studies investigating ureteral wall thickness using PROSPERO, OVID Medline, OVID EMBASE, Wiley Cochrane Library, Proquest Dissertations & Theses Global, and SCOPUS. A systematic review and meta-analysis using random effects model was conducted. Risk of bias was assessed using the MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies) score. RESULTS: Fourteen studies with a pooled population of 2,987 patients were included for quantitative analysis, and 34 studies were included in our qualitative review. Meta-analysis findings suggest that a thinner ureteral wall thickness is associated with more favorable subgroup stone outcomes. Thinner ureteral wall thickness suggests a lack of stone impaction and was associated with improved rates of spontaneous stone passage, successful retrograde guidewire and stent placement, and improved shock wave lithotripsy outcomes. Studies lack a standardized ureteral wall thickness measurement protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Ureteral wall thickness is a noninvasive measure that predicts ureteral stone impaction, and thin measurements are predictive of successful outcomes. Variability in measurement methods confirms that a standardized ureteral wall thickness protocol is needed, and the clinical utility of ureteral wall thickness is yet to be determined.