[Calciphylaxis, risk factors, treatment and outcomes. Retrospective study of 39 patients]. / Calcifilaxis, factores de riesgo, tratamiento y evolución. Estudio retrospectivo de 39 pacientes.

INTRODUCTION: Calciphylaxis is a serious vascular disorder characterized by calcification of tunica media, intimal hyperplasia, thrombosis, and skin necrosis. It was described in patients with renal failure (UC), although it can occur in its absence (NUC). Its risk factors are under study and its diagnosis can be complex. Over a decade ago, its mortality was estimated at 60-80%. Recent studies indicate that it has decreased (40%). METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out in the period between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2019. The past medical record, clinical characteristics, laboratory and histopathological findings, and evolution of all patients with calciphylaxis evaluated at the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires were reviewed. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were included. Sixtyone percent were men and 39% were NUC cases. Eightytwo percent had arterial hypertension, 66% obesity and 46% diabetes. Of those, 49% received coumarin anticoagulants. All patients with NUC and 75% with UC presented ulcers with necrosis, located more frequently on the legs. In 72% of the cases the histological diagnosis was made with one biopsy. In all the treatment was multimodal and mortality at one year was 42%. CONCLUSION: We observed a high proportion of patients with NUC, in relation to what is reported in the literature, and that half received vitamin K antagonists. The histological diagnosis was made with one biopsy in most of the cases, as the surgical technique for taking the sample, the Von Kossa staining and the evaluation by an expert pathologist were the key of it.

Introducción: La calcifilaxis es un trastorno vascular grave caracterizado por depósito de calcio en túnica media arteriolar, trombosis y necrosis cutánea. Se describió en pacientes con insuficiencia renal (CU), aunque puede producirse en su ausencia (CNU). Sus factores de riesgo están en estudio y su diagnóstico puede ser complejo. Su mortalidad se estimaba en 60-80%, aunque trabajos recientes indican que ha disminuido (40%). Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo entre el 1/1/2011 y el 31/12/2019. Se revisaron los antecedentes, las características clínicas, los hallazgos de laboratorio e histopatológicos, y la evolución de todos los pacientes con diagnóstico de calcifilaxis evaluados en el Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires. Resultados: Se incluyeron 39 pacientes. El 61.5% (24) eran hombres y 38.5% (15) fueron casos de CNU. De éstos, 82% presentaba hipertensión arterial, 66% obesidad y 46% diabetes. El 49% recibía anticoagulantes dicumarínicos. Todos los pacientes con CNU y 75% con CU presentaron úlceras de fondo necrótico, localizadas con mayor frecuencia en las piernas. En 72% de los casos el diagnóstico histológico se efectuó con una toma de biopsia. En todos, el tratamiento fue multimodal y la mortalidad al año fue de 42%. Conclusión: Observamos una elevada proporción de pacientes con CNU, en relación con lo comunicado en la literatura, y la mitad recibía anticoagulantes dicumarínicos. El diagnóstico histológico se efectuó por biopsia en la mayor parte de los casos, para lo cual la toma quirúrgica de la muestra, la tinción con Von Kossa y la evaluación por un patólogo experto fueron claves.

Common Histological Features Suggesting Enchondral Ossification Pathways in Calciphylaxis of Various Origins: A Study of Human Subcutaneous Tissue Biopsies.

Calciphylaxis is a rare, yet underdiagnosed condition causing high mortality in patients with severe renal and cardiovascular disease. Since knowledge of the pathophysiology of calciphylaxis is limited, a differential analysis of histological alterations in patient subgroups with various comorbidities might expose different disease phenotypes and allow deeper insights into the pathophysiology of the condition. Histological markers of osteogenesis and calcification were investigated in a group of 18 patients with clinically and histologically verified calciphylaxis, using immunohistochemical staining. Analysis of staining intensity and distribution of marker proteins in histological structures was performed to evaluate distinct patterns between subgroups with different clinical comorbidities in comparison with a control group. In all cases, immunohistochemical staining for bone matrix proteins, bone-morphogenic proteins and matrix-Gla proteins co-localized with subcutaneous vascular and interstitial calcifications. Significant expression of bone-morphogenic protein-7 and active matrix-Gla protein was observed. Mortality was associated with renal comorbidities and increased expression of bone-morphogenic protein-7. However, no distinct histological patterns were found between subgroups with renal disease, warfarin intake or coexisting micro- and macro-angiopathies. The upregulation of osteogenic markers (including bone-morphogenic protein-7) plays a major role in the development of calciphylaxis. Clinical outcome correlates with kidney function and phosphate handling, suggesting different pathophysiological mechanisms. However, biopsy  at late-stage disease shows a common histological phenotype, involving enchondral ossification.

Penile and digital calciphylaxis: A case report and literature review.

Calcific uremic arteriolopathy (CUA) represents a rare but severe disease with high morbimortality. The authors present the case of a 58-year-old male patient with chronic kidney disease due to obstructive uropathy, on hemodialysis (HD). He started HD due to uremic syndrome with a severe renal dysfunction, dysregulation of calcium and phosphate metabolism, and he presented with distal penile ischemia, which was treated with surgical debridement and hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Four months later, painful distal digital necrosis of both hands was observed. Extensive arterial calcification was observed on X-ray. A skin biopsy confirmed the presence of CUA. Sodium thiosulfate was administered for 3 months, HD was intensified, and hyperphosphatemia control was achieved, with progressive improvement of the lesions. This case illustrates an uncommon presentation of CUA in a patient on HD for a few months, non-diabetic and not anticoagulated, but with a severe dysregulation of calcium and phosphate metabolism.

Characterization of Risk Factors for Calciphylaxis in Hemodialysis Patients in the Fraser Health Renal Program - A Matched Case-Control Retrospective Review.

Introduction: Calciphylaxis is a lethal and rare disease characterized by ischemic and necrotic skin lesions caused by vascular calcification of adipose tissue. There have been many risk factors analyzed in the literature; however, the pathogenesis of calciphylaxis is still not well understood and treatment options are limited due to the lack of interventional studies. Our objectives were to describe risk factors, prevalence, incidence, and outcomes for calciphylaxis in hemodialysis patients within the Fraser Health Renal Program. Methods: This was a retrospective matched case-control study of hemodialysis patients within the Fraser Health Renal Program. Hemodialysis patients with calciphylaxis were matched to hemodialysis patients without calciphylaxis in a 1:2 ratio for age and sex from September 2, 2017 to July 3, 2020. Findings: There was a total of 40 calciphylaxis cases matched to 80 controls. In the univariate analysis, peritoneal dialysis, higher body mass index, lower serum iron, lower transferrin saturation, sevelamer, cinacalcet, warfarin, iron (PO), and insulin were associated with increased risk of calciphylaxis. In the multivariate analysis, only peritoneal dialysis, serum iron, sevelamer, and warfarin were identified as significant and strong risk factors associated with calciphylaxis. A low prevalence of 1.9% and high mortality rate of 57.5% at 12 months was found for calciphylaxis cases. Discussion: Significant risk factors associated with calciphylaxis were peritoneal dialysis, serum iron, sevelamer, and warfarin. Future studies should further investigate the impact of minimizing exposure to these risk factors to reduce calciphylaxis development.

When a Biopsy Is Inadequate in Diagnosing Calciphylaxis.

Calciphylaxis is a rare disease that typically presents in patients with end-stage renal disease and can be a diagnostic challenge. Calcium deposition with fibrin thrombi and necrosis of the overlying epidermis may support the diagnosis; however, depending on the stage of the disease, skin biopsy can have low sensitivity and specificity, and may be contraindicated in some situations. We discuss the utility of imaging studies in supporting the diagnosis of calciphylaxis. (SKINmed. 2022;20:450-451).

Identifying subcutaneous tissue microcalcification by Fluo-3 AM imaging in cutaneous calciphylaxis.

Calciphylaxis, also known as calcific uremic arteriolopathy (CUA), is typically characterized by subcutaneous tissue calcification and excruciatingly painful cutaneous lesions with high mortality. It is critical for dermatologists to make early diagnosis and appropriate management, yet currently only 56% of calciphylaxis cases are correctly diagnosed by conventional histological stain1. Specially, the identification of subtle calcium deposits of subcutaneous can be challenging but is believed crucial for early diagnosis of calciphylaxis2. More sensitive calcification staining is in high demand. In this study, Fluo-3 AM was found to be a rapid, sensitive and reliable fluorescent probe for the detection of calcium deposits and could be a promising diagnostic tool for calciphylaxis.

Cutaneous vascular calcification. Perieccrine calcification as a diagnostic key for calciphylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Attempts have been made to establish discriminative criteria between classic calciphylaxis (CPX) and those cases in which cutaneous vascular calcification (CVC) represents an incidental finding (epiphenomenon). METHODS: Retrospective, observational cohort study of patients with CVC to distinguish clinicopathological features between CVC as classic CPX (CVC in cutaneous lesions with erythematous-violaceous plaques with or without ulceration) or as an epiphenomenon (CVC in cutaneous lesions with known diagnosis). Different clinicopathological parameters and the presence of perieccrine calcification and pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE)-like changes were evaluated. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were studied. The CPX group showed a significantly higher percentage of renal failure, hypertension, altered laboratory parameters, painful lesions, and mortality rate. Histopathologically, the CPX group was associated with more than one vessel per field involved with subintimal concentric calcification and perieccrine calcification (observed exclusively in the CPX group), while PXE-like changes, although more frequent in the CPX group, were also observed in the epiphenomenon group. CONCLUSION: Perieccrine calcification and the presence of more than one vessel per field involved by concentric pattern calcification could be used as a diagnostic marker of CPX. Although PXE-like changes are not an exclusive marker, they could suggest CPX diagnosis.

Calciphylaxis: Part I. Diagnosis and pathology.

Calciphylaxis is an uncommon but devastating disorder characterized by vascular calcification and subsequent cutaneous tissue necrosis. This results in exquisitely painful and slow healing wounds that portend exceptionally high morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis of this condition can be complicated because there are no conclusive serologic, radiographic or visual signs that this disease is manifesting. The differential of tissue necrosis is broad, and identifying calciphylaxis requires an adroit understanding of the risk factors and physical signs that should raise suspicion of this condition. Reviews on this subject are uncommon and lack directed commentary from disease experts on the best diagnostic approach for patients suffering from this disease. The goal of this article is to update practicing dermatologists on the current standard of care for calciphylaxis.

An unexpected case of non-uremic calciphylaxis in a patient with multiple risk factors.

A 58-year-old woman with a history of morbid obesity, asthma, and prior warfarin use presented to the hospital with shortness of breath and a three-month history of painful, ulcerated ulcers with retiform purpura of her bilateral distal extremities. A punch biopsy specimen demonstrated focal necrosis and hyalinization of the adipose tissue with subtle arteriolar calcium deposition, findings consistent with calciphylaxis. We discuss the presentation of non-uremic calciphylaxis and review the risk factors, pathophysiology, and interdisciplinary management approach of this rare disease.

Calcifilaxis de la arteria temporal simulando arteritis temporal / Calciphylaxis of the temporal artery simulating temporal arteritis

La calcifilaxis se caracteriza por una intensa deposición de calcio en pequeños vasos sanguíneos, piel y otros órganos, descripta principalmente en pacientes con insuficiencia renal crónica, trasplante renal o disfunción paratiroidea. Hasta la fecha, solo hay siete casos descriptos en la literatura de calcifilaxis que imita arteritis de células gigantes (ACG). En esta revisión presentamos el octavo caso documentado patológicamente.

Calciphylaxis is characterized by intense deposition of calcium in small blood vessels, skin, and other organs, described mainly in patients with chronic renal insufficiency, renal transplant of parathyroid dysfunction. To date, there are only seven cases described in literature of calciphylaxis mimicking giant cell arteritis (GCA). In this review, we present the eighth case pathologically documented.

Cutaneous calciphylaxis of the glans penis presenting as a gangrenous ulceration.

Report _Case Presentation X Photo Vignette _Letter Authors declare that the contents of this article are their own original unpublished findings. Title: Cutaneous calciphylaxis of the glans penis presenting as a gangrenous ulceration Authors: Marie Danset, Cécile Lesort, Denis Jullien, Jean Kanitakis Affiliations: Dermatology Department, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Claude Bernard Lyon I University, Lyon, France Corresponding Author: Jean Kanitakis, Department of Dermatology, Edouard Herriot Hospital Group, 69437 Lyon Cedex 03, France, Tel: 33-472110301, Email: jean.kanitakis@univ-lyon1.fr Abstract: Calciphylaxis is a rare microvascular disorder causing necrotic skin ulcers. It is characterized by deposits of calcium within vascular walls but its precise pathogenesis remains poorly understood. A major risk factor is end-stage renal disease on dialysis. We report a 67-year-old man with calciphylaxis revealed by an unusual necrotic ulcer of the glans penis. The patient also presented with bilateral panniculitis of the thighs and a calf ulcer. All those lesions were painful, highlighting the value of pain as a diagnostic clue. Penile involvement of calciphylaxis is rare and biopsy is often avoided in this area. However, rapid diagnosis of calciphylaxis is important because early treatment has a better chance of being successful. Our patient's condition deteriorated rapidly with development of bilateral retinal artery occlusion and he died shortly thereafter. This case further highlights the fact that calciphylaxis is a systemic vascular disease with an ominous prognosis.

Multiorgan failure with fatal outcome after stem cell tourism.

BACKGROUND: Unproven stem cell treatments may involve serious health, personal, and financial considerations. Due to worldwide spread, illegal stem cell therapies have become a major public health problem. We have already witnessed numerous reports in the mass media of severe and occasionally even fatal outcomes after such therapies. However, there are only few scientifically documented cases in which the causality between stem cell therapy and side effects cannot be refuted. CASE PRESENTATION: Here we present a case report of a 48-year-old patient with serious side effects, including disseminated skin ulcers, hepatitis, and cardiomyopathy, with eventual fatal outcome following unproven stem cell treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The case of the patient presented here draws attention to the worst possible outcome of stem cell tourism. To effectively combat this issue, professionals and patients should be empowered with the right knowledge on possible side effects.