Potential drug-drug interaction between sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors and statins: pharmacological and clinical evidence.

INTRODUCTION: Recent case reports suggested that concomitant use of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors with statins could lead to increased statin toxicity. We provide a comprehensive overview of the available pharmacological and clinical evidence on this potential drug-drug interaction (DDI). AREAS COVERED: We searched MEDLINE PubMed until November 2020 for (i) pharmacokinetic studies on SGLT2 inhibitors, statins, and their potential interaction, and (ii) case reports and clinical studies assessing the safety of concomitant use of SGLT2 inhibitors and statins. We also searched regulatory documents submitted to the United States Food and Drug Administration for unpublished data on this potential DDI. EXPERT OPINION: SGLT2 inhibitors are increasingly used for type 2 diabetes, chronic heart failure, and chronic kidney disease, and concomitant use with statins is common given the comorbidity of indications. While pharmacokinetic studies in healthy subjects showed no clinically relevant changes in statin levels during SGLT2 inhibitor co-administration, the published case reports and pharmacologic reasoning support the possibility of an interaction. Underlying mechanisms could be pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic, and canagliflozin appears to be the SGLT2 inhibitor with the highest interaction potential. Further research including 'real-world' pharmacoepidemiologic studies is needed to better understand the clinical significance of this DDI.

Real world study of short term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of canagliflozin 100 mg initiation in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients during hot humid Indian summer.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To assess short term (3 months) efficacy, safety, and tolerability of canagliflozin 100 mg among type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) initiated during hot humid Indian summer. METHODS: A prospective, observational, multi-center study of 300 T2DM patients with inadequate glycemic control (i.e., HbA1c of ≥6.5%) with or without other antihyperglycemic agents (AHA) were enrolled in the study in the month of March. The objective of the study was to assess the efficacy that is changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), post-prandial plasma glucose (PPG), blood pressure (BP), lipid profile, body mass index (BMI) and safety of canagliflozin with regards to genitourinary infection, fall, diabetic keto acidosis (DKA) episodes, blood ketone and beta-hydroxybutyrate levels. All patients were initiated on canagliflozin 100 mg once daily for 12 weeks, irrespective of background medications. RESULTS: At 12 weeks, a significant reduction was observed in all the glycemic parameters,BMI, BP, total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). However, a nonsignificant reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was observed at 12 weeks. A total of 9 adverse events were reported including 2 episodes of urinary tract infection (UTI) and 4 episodes of genital infection. The blood ketone, beta-hydroxybutyrate levels were found to be within normal limits and no episode of DKA was reported at 12 weeks. None of our patients had reported any volume depletion related adverse events viz. postural hypotension, giddiness etc. CONCLUSION: Canagliflozin 100 mg can be safely initiated in type 2 diabetes patients during hot humid Indian summer, irrespective of background medications and is effective and well tolerated.

Insulin resistant diabetes mellitus in SHORT syndrome: case report and literature review.

SHORT syndrome is a rare developmental disorder frequently associated with growth failure and insulin resistant diabetes mellitus (IRDM). Since GH has a diabetogenic effect, GH therapy has been regarded as a contraindication. We observed a Brazilian girl with SHORT syndrome who received GH therapy from 4 6/12 years of age for SGA short stature. GH dosage was increased from 0.23 to 0.36 mg/kg/week, but statural response to GH therapy remained poor. Her blood HbA1c level, though it remained 5.5-6.0% in childhood, began to elevate with puberty and increased to 9.2% at 10 6/12 years of age, despite the discontinuation of GH therapy at 9 11/12 years of age. Laboratory studies indicated antibody-negative IRDM. She was treated with metformin and canagliflozin (a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor), which ameliorated overt diurnal hyperglycemia and mild nocturnal hypoglycemia and reduced her blood HbA1c around 7%. Whole exome sequencing revealed a de novo heterozygous pathogenic variant (c.1945C>T:p.(Arg649Trp)) in PIK3R1 known as the sole causative gene for SHORT syndrome. Subsequent literature review for patients with molecularly confirmed SHORT syndrome revealed the development of IRDM in 10 of 15 GH-untreated patients aged ≥12 years but in none of three GH-treated and six GH-untreated patients aged ≤10 years. These findings imply a critical role of pubertal development and/or advanced age rather than GH therapy in the development of IRDM, and a usefulness of SGLT2 inhibitor in the treatment of IRDM.

Relative and Absolute Risk Reductions in Cardiovascular and Kidney Outcomes With Canagliflozin Across KDIGO Risk Categories: Findings From the CANVAS Program.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Canagliflozin reduces the risk for cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in type 2 diabetes. This study aimed to assess the relative and absolute effects of canagliflozin on clinical outcomes across different KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) risk categories based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio. STUDY DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of the CANagliflozin cardioVascular Assessment Study (CANVAS) Program. SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS: The CANVAS Program randomly assigned 10,142 participants with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk and with eGFR≥30mL/min/1.73m2 to treatment with canagliflozin or placebo. INTERVENTION(S): Canagliflozin or matching placebo. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke, with a set of other cardiovascular and kidney prespecified outcomes. RESULTS: Of 10,142 participants, 10,031 (98.9%) had available baseline eGFR and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio data. The proportion of participants in low-, moderate-, high-, and very high-risk KDIGO categories was 58.6%, 25.8%, 10.6%, and 5.0%, respectively. The relative effect of canagliflozin on the primary outcome (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.97) was consistent across KDIGO risk categories (P trend=0.2), with similar results for other cardiovascular and kidney outcomes. Absolute reductions in the primary outcome were greater within higher KDIGO risk categories (P trend=0.03) with a similar pattern of effect for the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure (P trend=0.06) and for chronic eGFR slope (P trend = 0.04). LIMITATIONS: Predominantly a low kidney risk population, relatively few participants in higher KDIGO risk categories, and exclusion of individuals with eGFR<30mL/min/1.73m2. CONCLUSIONS: Although the relative effects of canagliflozin are similar across KDIGO risk categories, absolute risk reductions are likely greater for individuals at higher KDIGO risk. The KDIGO classification system may be able to identify individuals who might derive greater benefits for end-organ protection from treatment with canagliflozin. FUNDING: This post hoc analysis was not specifically funded. The original CANVAS Program trials were funded by Janssen Research & Development, LLC and were conducted as a collaboration between the funder, an academic steering committee, and an academic research organization, George Clinical. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The original trials of the CANVAS Program were registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with study numbers NCT01032629 and NCT01989754.

Canagliflozin ameliorates renal oxidative stress and inflammation by stimulating AMPK-Akt-eNOS pathway in the isoprenaline-induced oxidative stress model.

Diabetes is a leading cause of chronic kidney disease, and the high prevalence of sympathetic nervous system (SNS) hyperactivity in diabetic patients makes them further susceptible to SNS-mediated oxidative stress and accelerated kidney damage. Here, we investigated if canagliflozin can reverse isoprenaline (ISO)-induced renal oxidative damage in rats, a model that mimics SNS overstimulation-induced organ injuries in humans. We found that ISO administration elevates renal oxidative stress markers including malondialdehyde (MDA), advanced protein oxidation product (APOP), myeloperoxidase (MPO) and nitric oxide (NO), while depleting levels of endogenous antioxidants such as catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione (GSH). Strikingly, canagliflozin treatment of ISO-treated rats not only prevents elevation of oxidative stress markers but also rescues levels of depleted antioxidants. Our results also show that canagliflozin stimulates antioxidant/anti-inflammatory signaling pathways involving AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), Akt and eNOS, and inhibits iNOS and NADPH oxidase isoform 4 (NOX4), all of which are associated with oxidative stress and inflammation. Further, canagliflozin prevents ISO-induced apoptosis of kidney cells by inhibiting Bax protein upregulation and caspase-3 activation. Histological examination of kidney sections reveal that canagliflozin attenuates ISO-mediated increases in inflammatory cell infiltration, collagen deposition and fibrosis. Finally, consistent with these findings, canagliflozin treatment improves kidney function in ISO-treated rats, suggesting that the antioxidant effects may be clinically translatable.

Development of LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of Canagliflozin and Metformin in human plasma and its pharmacokinetic application in Indian population under fast and fed conditions.

A novel, selective and sensitive method is developed for simultaneous estimation of canagliflozin and metformin and successfully applied to fast and fed pharmacokinetic studies in healthy Indian volunteers. The current study reports the development, optimization, and validation of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for simultaneous quantification of canagliflozin and metformin in human plasma using deuterated canagliflozin D4 and metformin D6 as an internal standard (IS). The solid-phase extraction technique was employed where strata X polymeric reverse phase (30 mg-1 cc) SPE cartridges were used for the extraction of analytes and IS from plasma. The ACE 5 C18 column (50 × 4.6 mm, 5µ) was used to chromatograph the prepared samples. The mobile phase consisted of methanol and 5 mM ammonium trifluoroacetate in water, pH 5 (50:50, v/v) at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. Detection was performed by positive ion Turbo ion spray in Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode, monitoring the transitions m/z 461.9 â†’ m/z 191.1 and m/z 461.9 â†’ m/z 267.2, for quantification of canagliflozin. The response of canagliflozin fragments m/z 461.9 â†’ m/z 191.1 and m/z 461.9 â†’ m/z 267.2 was combined. Also, for metformin transitions were monitored at m/z 130.0 â†’ m/z 71.1. Full validation of the method was performed according to the United States Food and Drugs Administration (USFDA) guidelines. Linearity was in the range of 24.95-2806.55 ng/mL for canagliflozin and 24.99-3400.72 ng/mL for metformin. The mean extraction recovery of canagliflozin, canagliflozin D4, metformin, and metformin D6 was 77.240, 84.663, 66.747, and 67.449, respectively across four QC levels. This rapid method with the run time of 2.80 min allows the analysis of more than 400 plasma samples per day.

Improved Beta Cell Glucose Sensitivity Plays Predominant Role in the Decrease in HbA1c with Cana and Lira in T2DM.

AIM: To examine the effect of combination therapy with canagliflozin plus liraglutide versus each agent alone on beta cell function in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 45 poorly controlled (HbA1c = 7%-11%) T2DM patients received an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) before and after 16 weeks of treatment with: (i) liraglutide (LIRA); (ii) canagliflozin (CANA); (iii) liraglutide plus canagliflozin (CANA/LIRA). RESULTS: Both liraglutide and canagliflozin significantly lowered HbA1c with no significant additive effect of the combination on HbA1c (0.89%, 1.43%, and 1.67% respectively). Insulin secretion during the OGTT, measured with (∆C-Pep/∆G)0-120, increased in the 3 groups (from 0.30 ± 0.06 to 0.48 ± 0.10; 0.29 ± 0.05 to 0.98 ± 0.23; and 0.24 ± 0.06 to 1.09 ± 0.12 in subjects receiving CANA, LIRA and CANA/LIRA respectively; P = 0.02 for CANA vs LIRA, P < 0.0001, CANA/LIRA vs CANA), and the increase in insulin secretion was associated with an increase in beta cell glucose sensitivity (29 ± 5 to 55 ± 11; 33 ± 6 to 101 ± 16; and 28 ± 6 to 112 ± 12, respectively; P = 0.01 for CANA vs LIRA, P < 0.0001, CANA/LIRA vs CANA). No significant difference in the increase in insulin secretion or beta cell glucose sensitivity was observed between subjects in LIRA or CANA/LIRA groups. The decrease in HbA1c strongly and inversely correlated with the increase in beta cell glucose sensitivity (r = 0.71, P < 0.001). In multivariate regression model, improved beta cell glucose sensitivity was the strongest predictor of HbA1c decrease with each therapy. CONCLUSION: Improved beta cell glucose sensitivity with canagliflozin monotherapy and liraglutide monotherapy or in combination is major factor responsible for the HbA1c decrease. Canagliflozin failed to produce an additive effect to improve beta cell glucose sensitivity above that observed with liraglutide.

Quantitative determination of canagliflozin in human plasma samples using a validated HPTLC method and its application to a pharmacokinetic study in rats.

Canagliflozin (CNZ) is the first sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor approved for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. In the proposed work, a sensitive, rapid and validated high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) method was established for the estimation of CNZ in human plasma for the first time. HPTLC analysis of CNZ and internal standard (sildenafil) was performed on glass coated silica gel 60 F254 HPTLC plates using a binary mixture of chloroform-methanol 9:1 (%, v/v) as the mobile phase. Densitometric detection was done at 295 nm. Retardation factor values were obtained as 0.22 and 0.52 for the CNZ and the IS, respectively. The linearity range of CNZ was obtained as 200-3,200 ng/ml. A simple protein precipitation method was used for the extraction of analyte from plasma using methanol. The proposed HPTLC technique was validated for linearity, accuracy, precision and robustness. The proposed HPTLC technique was successfully utilized for the assessment of pharmacokinetic profile of CNZ in rats after oral administration. After oral administration, the peak plasma concentration of CNZ was obtained as 1458.01 ng/ml in 2 h. The proposed HPTLC method could be applied to the study of the pharmacokinetic profile of pharmaceutical formulations containing CNZ.

Using Data From Routine Care to Estimate the Effectiveness and Potential Limitations of Outcomes-Based Contracts for Diabetes Medications.

OBJECTIVES: Outcomes-based contracts tie rebates and discounts for expensive drugs to outcomes. The objective was to estimate the utility of outcomes-based contracts for diabetes medications using real-world data and to identify methodologic limitations of this approach. METHODS: A population-based cohort study of adults newly prescribed a medication for diabetes with a publicly announced outcomes-based contract (ie, exenatide microspheres ["exenatide"], dulaglutide, or sitagliptin) was conducted. The comparison group included patients receiving canagliflozin or glipizide. The primary outcome was announced in the outcomes-based contract: the percentage of adults with a follow-up hemoglobin A1C <8% up to 1 year later. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of patients diagnosed with hypoglycemia and the cost of a 1-month supply. RESULTS: Thousands of adults newly filled prescriptions for exenatide (n = 5079), dulaglutide (n = 6966), sitagliptin (n = 40 752), canagliflozin (n = 16 404), or glipizide (n = 59 985). The percentage of adults subsequently achieving a hemoglobin A1C below 8% ranged from 83% (dulaglutide, sitagliptin) to 71% (canagliflozin). The rate of hypoglycemia was 25 per 1000 person-years for exenatide, 37 per 1000 person-years for dulaglutide, 28 per 1000 person-years for sitagliptin, 18 per 1000 person-years for canagliflozin, and 34 per 1000 person-years for glipizide. The cash price for a 1-month supply was $847 for exenatide, $859 for dulaglutide, $550 for sitagliptin, $608 for canagliflozin, and $14 for glipizide. CONCLUSION: Outcomes-based pricing of diabetes medications has the potential to lower the cost of medications, but using outcomes such as hemoglobin A1C may not be clinically meaningful because similar changes in A1C can be achieved with generic medications at a far lower cost.

A Phase I Study on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of DJT1116PG, a Novel Selective Inhibitor of Sodium-glucose Cotransporter Type 2, in Healthy Individuals at Steady State.

PURPOSE: DJT1116PG, which selectively inhibits renal glucose reabsorption by inhibiting sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2, was developed as an insulin-independent treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus. This Phase I trial evaluated the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of DJT1116PG at steady state in healthy Chinese individuals. METHODS: This was a multiple ascending dose study of DJT1116PG (20, 50, and 100 mg once daily for 7 days) that included 36 healthy individuals. FINDINGS: There were no serious adverse events or deaths in these studies, and no adverse event led to study discontinuation. Oral DJT1116PG was rapidly absorbed with a Tmax of 0.75-1.5 h and a t½ of 12-16.2 h. Systemic exposure (Cmax and AUC) of DJT1116PG and its inactive metabolites (T1444, T1454, and T1830) increased in a dose-dependent manner. Urinary glucose excretion (UGE) plateaued at 50 mg of DJT1116PG in a previous single ascending dose study and on day 1 of this study. UGE plateaued at 20 mg of DJT1116PG on day 7 of this study. Serum glucose parameters were similar in individuals who received DJT1116PG or placebo. IMPLICATIONS: DJT1116PG was well tolerated in healthy Chinese individuals. At steady state, UGE plateaued at 20 mg of DJT1116PG in these individuals. These findings will inform the selection of doses for further early-stage clinical trials of DJT1116PG. Chinese Drug Trial Identifier: CTR20160986.

Renal and Cardiovascular Effects of Sodium Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease: Perspectives on the Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation Trial Results.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) risk is elevated in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Disease management in these patients has been generally focused on glycemic control and controlling other renal and cardiac risk factors as, historically, few protective therapies have been available. The Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation -(CREDENCE) trial of canagliflozin was the first study to demonstrate renal protection with a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor in patients with T2DM and CKD, and these results could have important implications for clinical practice. SUMMARY: In CREDENCE, participants with T2DM and estimated glomerular filtration rate 30-<90 mL/min/1.73 m2 and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio >300-5,000 mg/g who were treated with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker for ≥4 weeks prior to randomization at either the maximum labeled or tolerated dose were randomized to receive either canagliflozin 100 mg or placebo. Canagliflozin significantly reduced the risk of the primary composite outcome of doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage kidney disease, or renal or cardiovascular (CV) death compared with placebo (hazard ratio 0.70, 95% CI 0.59-0.82; p = 0.00001). Canagliflozin also reduced the risk of secondary renal and CV outcomes. The safety profile of canagliflozin in CREDENCE was generally similar to previous studies of canagliflozin. No imbalances were observed between canagliflozin and placebo in the risk of amputation or fracture in the CREDENCE population. Key Messages: The positive renal and CV effects of canagliflozin observed in the -CREDENCE trial could have a substantial impact on improving outcomes for patients with T2DM and CKD.

Combination Therapy With Canagliflozin Plus Liraglutide Exerts Additive Effect on Weight Loss, but Not on HbA1c, in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of combination therapy with canagliflozin plus liraglutide on HbA1c, endogenous glucose production (EGP), and body weight versus each therapy alone. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty-five patients with poorly controlled (HbA1c 7-11%) type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on metformin with or without sulfonylurea received a 9-h measurement of EGP with [3-3H]glucose infusion, after which they were randomized to receive 1) liraglutide 1.2 mg/day (LIRA), 2) canagliflozin 100 mg/day (CANA), or 3) liraglutide 1.2 mg plus canagliflozin 100 mg (CANA/LIRA) for 16 weeks. At 16 weeks, the EGP measurement was repeated. RESULTS: The mean decrease from baseline to 16 weeks in HbA1c was -1.67 ± 0.29% (P = 0.0001), -0.89 ± 0.24% (P = 0.002), and -1.44 ± 0.39% (P = 0.004) in patients receiving CANA/LIRA, CANA, and LIRA, respectively. The decrease in body weight was -6.0 ± 0.8 kg (P < 0.0001), -3.5 ± 0.5 kg (P < 0.0001), and -1.9 ± 0.8 kg (P = 0.03), respectively. CANA monotherapy caused a 9% increase in basal rate of EGP (P < 0.05), which was accompanied by a 50% increase (P < 0.05) in plasma glucagon-to-insulin ratio. LIRA monotherapy reduced plasma glucagon concentration and inhibited EGP. In CANA/LIRA-treated patients, EGP increased by 15% (P < 0.05), even though the plasma insulin response was maintained at baseline and the CANA-induced rise in plasma glucagon concentration was blocked. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that liraglutide failed to block the increase in EGP caused by canagliflozin despite blocking the rise in plasma glucagon and preventing the decrease in plasma insulin concentration caused by canagliflozin. The failure of liraglutide to prevent the increase in EGP caused by canagliflozin explains the lack of additive effect of these two agents on HbA1c.

Differentiating the Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 1 Inhibition Capacity of Canagliflozin vs. Dapagliflozin and Empagliflozin Using Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Modeling.

The aim of this research was to differentiate dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and canagliflozin based on their capacity to inhibit sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT) 1 and 2 in patients with type 2 diabetes using a previously developed quantitative systems pharmacology model of renal glucose filtration, reabsorption, and excretion. The analysis was based on pooled, mean study-level data on 24-hour urinary glucose excretion, average daily plasma glucose, and estimated glomerular filtration rate collected from phase I and II clinical trials of SGLT2 inhibitors. Variations in filtered glucose across clinical studies were shown to drive the apparent differences in the glucosuria dose-response relationships among the gliflozins. A normalized dose-response analysis demonstrated similarity of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin, but not canagliflozin. At approved doses, SGLT1 inhibition by canagliflozin but not dapagliflozin or empagliflozin contributed to ~ 10% of daily urinary glucose excretion.

Enhanced oral bioavailability and anti-diabetic activity of canagliflozin through a spray dried lipid based oral delivery: a novel paradigm.

AIM: Canagliflozin (CFZ), a novel SGLT II antagonist, exhibits erratic absorption after oral administration. The current study entails development and evaluation of spray dried lipid based formulation (solid SMEDDS) for enhancing oral bioavailability and anti-diabetic activity of CFZ. METHODS: Solid SMEDDS developed through spray drying containing Neusilin US2 as an adsorbent. The formed solid SMEDDS were characterized for physicochemical and solid state attributes. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) were used to confirm the spherical morphology. In vitro dissolution, ex vivo permeability and in vivo pharmacokinetic studies were conducted to determine the release rate, permeation rate and absorption profile of CFZ, respectively. Pharmacodynamic studies were done as per standard protocols. RESULTS: The optimized solid SMEDDS exhibited acceptable practical yield and flow properties and is vouched with enhanced amorphization, nanoparticulate distribution and acceptable drug content. The spherical morphology of solid SMEDDS and reconstituted SMEDDS were confirmed in SEM and TEM, respectively. In vitro dissolution studies revealed multi-fold release behavior in CFZ in various dissolution media, whereas, remarkable permeability was observed in jejunum segment of rat intestine. Pharmacokinetic studies of CFZ in solid SMEDDS demonstrated 2.53 and 1.43 fold enhancement in Cmax and 2.73 and 1.98 fold in AUC 0-24h, as compared to pure API and marketed formulation, respectively. Pharmacological evaluation of solid SMEDDS revealed enhanced anti-diabetic activity of CFZ through predominant SGLT II inhibition in rats, as evident from evaluation of biochemical levels, urinary glucose excretion studies and SGLT II expression analysis. CONCLUSION: The current work describes significant improvement biopharmaceutical properties of CFZ in solid SMEDD formulation. Graphical abstract Graphical Abstract: Enhanced oral bioavailability and anti-diabetic activity of canagliflozin through a spray dried lipid based oral delivery: a novel paradigm.

Effects of once-weekly semaglutide vs once-daily canagliflozin on body composition in type 2 diabetes: a substudy of the SUSTAIN 8 randomised controlled clinical trial.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Intra-abdominal or visceral obesity is associated with insulin resistance and an increased risk for cardiovascular disease. This study aimed to compare the effects of semaglutide 1.0 mg and canagliflozin 300 mg on body composition in a subset of participants from the SUSTAIN 8 Phase IIIB, randomised double-blind trial who underwent whole-body dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning. METHODS: Adults (age ≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes, HbA1c 53-91 mmol/mol (7.0-10.5%), on a stable daily dose of metformin (≥1500 mg or maximum tolerated dose) and with an eGFR ≥60 ml min-1 [1.73 m]-2 were randomised 1:1 to semaglutide 1.0 mg once weekly and canagliflozin placebo once daily, or canagliflozin 300 mg once daily and semaglutide placebo once weekly. Body composition was assessed using whole-body DXA scans. The study participants and investigator remained blinded throughout the trial, and quality of DXA scans was evaluated in a blinded manner. Change from baseline to week 52 in total fat mass (kg) was the confirmatory efficacy endpoint. RESULTS: A subset of 178 participants (semaglutide, n = 88; canagliflozin, n = 90) underwent DXA scanning at screening and were randomised into the substudy. Of these, 114 (semaglutide, n = 53; canagliflozin, n = 61) participants had observed end-of-treatment data included in the confirmatory efficacy analysis. Of the 178 participants in the substudy, numerical improvements in body composition (including fat mass, lean mass and visceral fat mass) were observed after 52 weeks with both treatments. Total fat mass (baseline 33.2 kg) was reduced by 3.4 kg and 2.6 kg with semaglutide and canagliflozin, respectively (estimated treatment difference: -0.79 [95% CI -2.10, 0.51]). Although total lean mass (baseline 51.3 kg) was also reduced by 2.3 kg and 1.5 kg with semaglutide and canagliflozin, respectively (estimated treatment difference: -0.78 [-1.61, 0.04]), the proportion of lean mass (baseline 59.4%) increased by 1.2%- and 1.1%-point, respectively (estimated treatment difference 0.14 [-0.89, 1.17]). Changes in visceral fat mass and overall changes in body composition (assessed by the fat to lean mass ratio) were comparable between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: In individuals with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes on stable-dose metformin therapy, the changes in body composition with semaglutide and canagliflozin were not significantly different. Although numerical improvements in body composition were observed following treatment in both treatment arms, the specific impact of both treatments on body composition in the absence of a placebo arm is speculative at this stage. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03136484. FUNDING: This trial was supported by Novo Nordisk A/S, Denmark.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rongliflozin, a novel selective inhibitor of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2, in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AIMS: To evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) characteristics of rongliflozin in a cohort of healthy Chinese people and people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined the effects of a single ascending dose (SAD) of rongliflozin (10-200 mg) in combination with food (20 mg) in 50 healthy people, and a multiple ascending dose (MAD) of rongliflozin (10-50 mg once daily for 12 days) in 36 people with T2DM. RESULTS: No serious adverse events (AEs) or discontinuations as a result of AEs (related to rongliflozin) occurred in either study. In healthy participants and those with T2DM, rongliflozin was rapidly absorbed, with a time to maximum plasma concentration of 0.63 to 1.75 hours. Systemic exposure (maximum observed serum concentration and area under the curve) to rongliflozin and its inactive major metabolites (T1444, T1454 and T1830) increased in proportion to dose. In the SAD and MAD studies, there was a dose-related increase in urinary glucose excretion (UGE) ranging from 10 to 50 mg rongliflozin. This increase in UGE was associated with dose-related decreases in serum glucose values in people with T2DM in the MAD group. In the SAD group, UGE plateaued at 50 to 200 mg. CONCLUSIONS: Rongliflozin was well tolerated in all participants. The PK and PD measurements obtained for rongliflozin demonstrate a dose-response relationship when the drug is administered at doses ranging from 10 to 50 mg in healthy people and in people with T2DM.

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of two oral formulations of canagliflozin after single-dose administration in healthy Chinese subjects
.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetic properties and bioequivalence of two oral formulations of canagliflozin: a newly developed generic formulation (test) and a branded formulation (reference). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, open-label, two-way crossover study was conducted in 55 healthy Chinese subjects. They were randomized to receive a single oral dose of 100 mg of test or reference canagliflozin tablets according to an open crossover design under fasting and fed states. Plasma canagliflozin concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and the pharmacokinetic parameters maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-t and AUC0-∞) were used to evaluate bioequivalence. RESULTS: The geometric mean ratio 90% confidence intervals for fasting Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were 85.14 - 114.40%, 102.14 - 106.51%, and 102.21 - 106.85%, respectively, and fed Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were 90.15 - 107.17%, 97.38 - 102.19%, and 96.78 - 101.92%, respectively. The mean values of tmax were prolonged in the test compared with the reference formulations. In addition, the mean values of tmax and Cmax for both formulations were significantly different under fed compared with fasting conditions, while there was no significant difference in AUC0-t or AUC0-∞. CONCLUSION: The two types of canagliflozin tablets were bioequivalent under both fasting and fed states, and both were generally well tolerated.

Real-world comparison of hospitalization costs for heart failure in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with established cardiovascular disease treated with canagliflozin versus other antihyperglycemic agents.

Aims: This real-world study compared hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) costs and all-cause healthcare costs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and established cardiovascular disease treated with the sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) canagliflozin and non-SGLT2i antihyperglycemic agents (AHAs).Materials and methods: Propensity score-matched cohorts from a retrospective observational study (OBSERVE-4D) using the Truven MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters and Optum Clinformatics databases were analyzed. HHF and all-cause healthcare costs per-patient-per-month (PPPM) were compared for patients initiated on canagliflozin and non-SGLT2i AHAs in the on-treatment analysis.Results: Baseline characteristics were well balanced between matched cohorts that included new users of canagliflozin or non-SGLT2i AHAs in the Truven (13,954 and 45,101, respectively) and Optum (11,490 and 53,360, respectively) databases. The mean (95% CI) PPPM cost of HHF was lower for canagliflozin than for non-SGLT2i AHAs in analyses of both the Truven ($21.31 [$21.25, $21.37]) and Optum ($30.43 [$30.41, $30.45]) databases. The mean (95% CI) PPPM all-cause healthcare cost was also lower for canagliflozin than for non-SGLT2i AHAs in analyses of both the Truven ($321 [$280, $361]) and Optum ($449 [$402, $495]) databases.Limitations: This study is subject to the limitations inherent to observational research including potential for coding errors and biases and unobserved confounding. Because all patients were in commercially administered health plans, these findings cannot be easily generalized to uninsured or Medicaid populations. Patient costs were evaluated up to and including their first HHF event. Post-discharge costs such as the costs of subsequent rehospitalizations were not included in this analysis.Conclusions: For patients with T2DM and established cardiovascular disease in this real-world study, treatment with canagliflozin was associated with lower HHF costs and all-cause healthcare costs compared with treatment with non-SGLT2i AHAs.