Hypofractionated versus standard fractionation radiotherapy for merkel cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) radiation treatment has historically consisted of standard 1.8-2 Gy fractions treated daily over 4-6 weeks. Hypofractionated treatment regimens have demonstrated tumor control and toxicity equivalence to standard fractionation regimens for common cutaneous malignancies such as basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas. Herein we report the outcomes of hypofractionated versus standard fractionation radiotherapy for MCC at our institution. MATERIALS/METHODS: The study involved a retrospective review of MCC patients treated with radiotherapy. Treatment characteristics and patient outcomes, including acute toxicities, disease recurrence and survival data were collected. The cumulative incidence of local and distant failures was estimated, with death as a competing risk. RESULTS: A total of 29 treatment courses for 24 patients were included, of which 13 involved standard fractionation with curative intent, 10 involved hypofractionated radiotherapy with curative intent, and 6 involved single fraction (8 Gy) palliative radiation. Half the patients were treated to a head/neck site. A subset of patients treated adjuvantly with curative intent included 8 standard fractionation and 8 hypofractionated radiotherapy patients. No statistically significant differences in local and/or distant failure or overall survival was observed between the patient groups. CONCLUSION: Hypofractionated radiotherapy for MCC was associated with similar treatment outcomes relative to standard fractionation. In our limited patient sample, hypofractionated radiation treatment achieved similar results with similar toxicity and fewer treatments. Further analysis of a larger patient population with longer follow up is needed to confirm treatment tolerability and efficacy.

A Novel Artificial Intelligence-Based Parameterization Approach of the Stromal Landscape in Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Study.

Tumor-stroma ratio (TSR) has been recognized as a valuable prognostic indicator in various solid tumors. This study aimed to examine the clinicopathologic relevance of TSR in Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) using artificial intelligence (AI)-based parameterization of the stromal landscape and validate TSR scores generated by our AI model against those assessed by humans. One hundred twelve MCC cases with whole-slide images were collected from 4 different institutions. Whole-slide images were first partitioned into 128 × 128-pixel "mini-patches," then classified using a novel framework, termed pre-tumor and stroma (Pre-TOAST) and TOAST, whose output equaled the probability of the minipatch representing tumor cells rather than stroma. Hierarchical random samplings of 50 minipatches per region were performed throughout 50 regions per slide. TSR and tumor-stroma landscape (TSL) parameters were estimated using the maximum-likelihood algorithm. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the area under the curve value of Pre-TOAST in discriminating classes of interest including tumor cells, collagenous stroma, and lymphocytes from nonclasses of interest including hemorrhage, space, and necrosis was 1.00. The area under the curve value of TOAST in differentiating tumor cells from related stroma was 0.93. MCC stroma was categorized into TSR high (TSR ≥ 50%) and TSR low (TSR < 50%) using both AI- and human pathology-based methods. The AI-based TSR-high subgroup exhibited notably shorter metastasis-free survival (MFS) with a statistical significance of P = .029. Interestingly, pathologist-determined TSR subgroups lacked statistical significance in recurrence-free survival, MFS, and overall survival (P > .05). Density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise analysis identified the following 2 distinct TSL clusters: TSL1 and TSL2. TSL2 showed significantly shorter recurrence-free survival (P = .045) and markedly reduced MFS (P < .001) compared with TSL1. TSL classification appears to offer better prognostic discrimination than traditional TSR evaluation in MCC. TSL can be reliably calculated using an AI-based classification framework and predict various prognostic features of MCC.

High cardiovascular mortality risk among older merkel cell carcinoma patients.

OBJECTIVE: Previous research has primarily focused on the incidence and mortality rates of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), neglecting the examination of cardiovascular mortality (CVM) risk among survivors, particularly older patients. This study aims to assess the risk of CVM in older individuals diagnosed with MCC. METHODS: Data pertaining to older MCC patients were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER). CVM risk was measured using standardized mortality ratio (SMR) and cumulative mortality. Multivariate Fine-Gray's competing risk model was utilized to evaluate the risk factors contributing to CVM. RESULTS: Among the study population of 2,899 MCC patients, 465 (16.0%) experienced CVM during the follow-up period. With the prolongation of the follow-up duration, the cumulative mortality rate for CVM reached 27.36%, indicating that cardiovascular disease (CVD) became the second most common cause of death. MCC patients exhibited a higher CVM risk compared to the general population (SMR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.54-1.86, p < 0.05). Notably, the SMR for other diseases of arteries, arterioles, and capillaries displayed the most significant elevation (SMR: 2.69; 95% CI: 1.16-5.29, p < 0.05). Furthermore, age at diagnosis and disease stage were identified as primary risk factors for CVM, whereas undergoing chemotherapy or radiation demonstrated a protective effect. CONCLUSION: This study emphasizes the significance of CVM as a competing cause of death in older individuals with MCC. MCC patients face a heightened risk of CVM compared to the general population. It is crucial to prioritize cardiovascular health starting from the time of diagnosis and implement personalized CVD monitoring and supportive interventions for MCC patients at high risk. These measures are essential for enhancing survival outcomes.

Avelumab as second-line or later treatment in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: Analysis of real-world outcomes in France using the CARADERM database linked to the French national healthcare database.

AIM: Avelumab has been approved worldwide for treatment of metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC), a rare and aggressive skin cancer. This study evaluated outcomes in patients with mMCC in France who received avelumab as second-line or later (2L+) treatment in routine clinical practice. METHODS: This retrospective, noninterventional study evaluated all patients diagnosed with mMCC using two databases: CARADERM (French national database of rare dermatological cancers) and SNDS (national healthcare database), identified via probabilistic linkage. Eligible patients initiated avelumab as 2L+ treatment between August 2016 and December 2019 and were followed for 24 months. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) at 24 months. RESULTS: Overall, 180 patients who received 2L+ avelumab were identified (112 from CARADERM, 68 after SNDS linkage). Median age at diagnosis was 74.0 years and 177 (98.3 %) had received chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment. Median follow-up was 13.1 months. Median OS from start of avelumab was 14.6 months (95 % CI, 9.9-21.3) in the overall population, 15.9 months (95 % CI, 8.6-28.3) in CARADERM patients, and 13.3 months (95 % CI, 6.7-19.1) in non-CARADERM patients. OS rates at 12 and 24 months were 53.8 % (95 % CI, 46.2 %-60.8 %) and 40.5 % (95 % CI, 33.2 %-47.6 %), respectively. In evaluable patients (CARADERM database), median progression-free survival was 3.6 months (95 % CI, 2.7-7.5) and the objective response rate was 55.3 % (95 % CI, 45.3-65.4), including complete response in 31.9 %. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world outcomes with 2L+ avelumab treatment for mMCC are consistent with clinical trial findings, supporting the recommendation of avelumab as a standard of care.

PRAME Expression in Merkel Cell Carcinoma.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive neuroendocrine tumor of the skin. Risk factors include extensive sun damage, infection with Merkel cell polyomavirus, and an immunocompromised state. PRAME, also known as preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma, is a cancer-testis antigen recently found to be a useful diagnostic tool in the workup of melanocytic neoplasms. However, the expression pattern of PRAME in Merkel cell carcinoma is unknown. In this study, we examine PRAME expression in Merkel cell carcinoma and explore its prognostic implications. The institutional archives at the University of Virginia were used to search for tumors classified as Merkel cell carcinoma from 2004 to 2022. All potential cases were reviewed to confirm the diagnosis, and electronic medical records were searched for clinical and demographic data. Tumors were subsequently immunostained for PRAME and Merkel cell polyomavirus. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate relative (all-cause) survival of PRAME positivity and MCPyV positivity in our study as well as MCC-specific survival of PRAME positivity. Univariate and multivariable models were created for each outcome related to all-cause survival. A total of 39 cases were included in the study. Twenty-eight percent (11 cases) demonstrated strong PRAME expression, and 27% of cases were positive for Merkel cell polyomavirus. There was no statistically significant correlation between PRAME expression and virus positivity. With respect to PRAME, the adjusted all-cause mortality hazard ratio was 11.4 (95% CI: 1.8, 70.8). The unadjusted MCC-specific hazard ratio was 4.6 (95% CI: 0.8, 27.5). The adjusted hazard ratio pertaining to Merkel cell polyomavirus infection was 0.25 (95% CI: 0.02, 2.96). In this limited cohort, PRAME expression appears to correlate with worse outcomes in Merkel cell carcinoma.

Inpatient prevalence and factors associated with Merkel Cell Carcinoma inpatient hospitalization in the United States.

Merkel Cell Carcinoma is a rare and aggressive cutaneous carcinoma with a propensity for metastasis and death. Our study describes the prevalence, sociodemographics and inpatient mortality of Merkel Cell Carcinoma related hospitalizations in the United States from 2011 to 2020. We conducted an observational study using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, which captures a 20% sample of all hospitalizations in the United States. We utilized the International Classification of Disease Clinical Modification codes from the ninth and tenth revision to identify Merkel Cell Carcinoma and demographic factors. There was a total of 28,809 cases of Merkel Cell Carcinoma in the United States from 2011 to 2020. Merkel Cell Carcinoma was associated with white race (11.4 per 100,000) and disposition of death (26.8 per 100,000). It was most prevalent in the highest quartile income (12.5 per 100,000) and Medicare as primary payer (13.0 per 100,000). Hospitalization was lowest in nonwhite races, particularly NH-Blacks and NH-Others. Inpatient mortality was significantly associated with NH-Others (odds ratio 2.18, 95% confidence interval = 1.38-3.45) and self-pay patients (odds ratio = 2.93, 95% confidence interval 1.84-4.67).This study contributes to reported socio-demographic factors related to Merkel Cell Carcinomas and brings awareness to factors associated with increased hospitalization and inpatient mortality.

The prognostic value of the Merkel cell polyomavirus serum antibody test: A dual institutional observational study.

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive cancer with often poor outcomes. Limited biomarkers exist for predicting clinical outcomes. The Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) serum antibody test (AMERK) has shown potential for indicating better recurrence-free survival in a single-institution study. The study aimed to evaluate the link between initial AMERK serostatus and survival. Secondary objectives included examining the relationship between initial AMERK titer levels and tumor burden. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study across two institutions analyzed patients tested with AMERK within 90 days of MCC diagnosis. Regression models assessed the association of survival outcomes with serostatus, considering various factors. The relationship between AMERK titer and tumor burden indicators was evaluated using ANOVA. Significance testing was exploratory, without a fixed significance level. RESULTS: Of 261 MCC patients tested, 49.4% were initially seropositive (titer ≥75). Multivariable analysis showed that seropositivity improved recurrence, event-free, overall, and MCC-specific survival rates. Strong associations were found between initial AMERK titer and clinical, tumor, and nodal stages, tumor size, and disease extent. Notably, improved survival with seropositivity was observed only in patients with localized disease at initial presentation. CONCLUSION: Circulating antibodies to MCPyV oncoproteins, as indicated by the AMERK test, are linked with better survival in MCC patients with localized disease at presentation. This could enhance patient risk profiling and treatment personalization. The study's retrospective nature and exploratory analysis are key limitations. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a potentially aggressive skin cancer, and tools to predict patient outcomes are limited. A blood test called anti-Merkel cell panel (AMERK), which checks for specific antibodies related to this cancer, might give us some clues. In this study, we looked at 261 MCC patients who took the AMERK test within 90 days of diagnosis. We found that patients with an initial positive AMERK result tended to have better outcomes, especially if their cancer was in the early stages. However, it is important to note that this study has limitations, including using retrospective data and exploratory analyses.

First-line Immunotherapy for Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Analysis of Real-world Survival Data and Practice Patterns.

OBJECTIVES: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are a promising new therapy for advanced Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC). We investigated real-world utilization and survival outcomes of first-line immunotherapies in a contemporary cohort. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we identified 759 patients with MCC between 2015 and 2020 with stage IV disease and known status of first-line systemic therapy. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to determine predictors of immunotherapy usage. Overall survival (OS) was compared for patients receiving immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or no systemic therapies. RESULTS: We identified 759 patients meeting our inclusion criteria: 329 patients received immunotherapy, 161 received chemotherapy, and 269 received no systemic therapy. Adjusting for demographic, clinical, and facility factors, high facility volume significantly predicted first-line immunotherapy use (OR 1.99; P =0.017). Median OS was 16.2, 12.3, and 8.7 months, among patients who received immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or no systemic therapy, respectively ( P <0.001). On Cox multivariable survival analysis, first-line immunotherapy treatment (HR=0.79, P =0.041) and treatment at high-volume centers (HR=0.58, P =0.004) were associated with improved OS. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with clinical trial results, first-line immunotherapy associated with improvement in median overall survival for patients with stage IV MCC, significantly outperforming chemotherapy in this real-world cohort. Treatment at high-volume centers associated with first-line immunotherapy utilization suggesting that familiarity with this rare disease is important to achieving optimal outcomes for metastatic MCC.

Patterns of initial distant metastases in 151 patients undergoing surveillance for treated Merkel cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is associated with high rates of recurrence and distant metastatic progression. Current guidelines for surveillance imaging are not evidence based. Better characterization of the pattern of distant metastatic spread will better inform surveillance and facilitate earlier detection of metastases. OBJECTIVES: This retrospective study aimed to assess potential relationships between primary tumour site and site of initial distant metastasis, time to distant metastasis, overall survival (OS) and MCC-specific death (MSD). METHODS: Patients with local or regional (Stage I-III) disease who were treated with curative intent and progressed to Stage IV were included in this study (n = 151). Fisher's exact test was used to assess differences in patterns of initial distant metastases based on primary tumour site. Time to initial distant metastasis was calculated from date of MCC diagnosis. OS and MSD were calculated from date of initial distant metastasis to date of death from any or MCC-related causes, respectively. RESULTS: Of 151 patients included in analysis, 89 (58.9%) had a single initial distant metastatic site, and 62 (41.1%) had multiple sites. Patients with upper limb primary tumours were significantly less likely to develop distant lymph node or liver metastases (p = 0.02 and 0.04, respectively). Median time to distant metastasis was 11 months (IQR 6.7-17.9 months). Median OS was 15.3 months, and was shorter for patients with liver (7.0 months, p = 0.0004) or bone metastases (8.9 months, p < 0.0001). Using skin/soft tissue metastasis as a reference group, patients with multiple metastatic sites had significantly higher hazards of MSD (HR = 3.46 univariate, 3.77 multivariate analysis). Time to distant metastasis, OS and MSD did not differ by viral status. CONCLUSION: Sites of initial distant metastasis are related to primary tumour sites and survival outcomes. Because patients often have multiple initial metastases, full-body cross-sectional rather than region-specific imaging may facilitate earlier detection of metastatic disease.

Head and Neck Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Therapeutic Benefit of Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Nodal Disease.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the therapeutic effect of post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) with respect to nodal status among patients with head and neck Merkel cell carcinoma (HNMCC). METHODS: In this retrospective study, we queried Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) dataset from 2000 through 2019. We included all adult patients who received primary surgical resection for histologically confirmed treatment naive HNMCC. Entropy balancing was used to reweight observations such that there was covariate balance between patients who received PORT and patients who received surgical resection alone. Doubly robust estimation was achieved by incorporating weights into a multivariable cox proportional hazards model. Planned post hoc subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of PORT by pathological node status. RESULTS: Among 752 patients (mean age, 73.3 years [SD 10.8]; 64.2% male; 91.2% White; 41.9% node-positive), 60.4% received PORT. Among node-positive patients, we found that PORT was associated with improved overall survival (OS) (aHR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.37-0.81; p = 0.003) and improved disease-specific survival (DSS) (aHR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.35-0.92; p = 0.022). Among node-negative patients, we found that PORT was not associated with OS and was associated with worse DSS (aHR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.30-4.23; p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: We found that PORT was associated with improved OS and DSS for node-positive patients and worse DSS for node-negative patients. For HNMCC treated with primary surgical resection, these data confirm the value of PORT for pathologically node-positive patients and support the use of single modality surgical therapy for pathologically node-negative patients without other adverse risk factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:3587-3594, 2024.

Clinical and molecular characteristics associated with response to therapeutic PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition in advanced Merkel cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Based on its viral-associated or UV-associated carcinogenesis, Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a highly immunogenic skin cancer. Thus, clinically evident MCC occurs either in immuno-compromised patients or based on tumor-intrinsic immune escape mechanisms. This notion may explain that although advanced MCC can be effectively restrained by treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), a considerable percentage of patients does not benefit from ICI therapy. Biomarkers predicting ICI treatment response are currently not available. METHODS: The present multicenter retrospective study investigated clinical and molecular characteristics in 114 patients with unresectable MCC at baseline before treatment with ICI for their association with therapy response (best overall response, BOR). In a subset of 21 patients, pretreatment tumor tissue was analyzed for activation, differentiation and spatial distribution of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL). RESULTS: Of the 114 patients, n=74 (65%) achieved disease control (BOR=complete response/partial response/stable disease) on ICI. A Bayesian cumulative ordinal regression model revealed absence of immunosuppression and a limited number of tumor-involved organ systems was highly associated with a favorable therapy response. Unimpaired overall performance status, high age, normal serum lactate dehydrogenase and normal serum C reactive protein were moderately associated with disease control. While neither tumor Merkel cell polyomavirus nor tumor PD-L1 status showed a correlation with therapy response, treatment with anti-PD-1 antibodies was associated with a higher probability of disease control than treatment with anti-PD-L1 antibodies. Multiplexed immunohistochemistry demonstrated the predominance of CD8+ effector and central memory T cells (TCM) in close proximity to tumor cells in patients with a favorable therapy response. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate the absence of immunosuppression, a limited number of tumor-affected organs, and a predominance of CD8+ TCM among TIL, as baseline parameters associated with a favorable response to PD-1/PD-L1 ICI therapy of advanced MCC. These factors should be considered when making treatment decisions in MCC patients.

Merkel cell carcinoma in situ: A systematic review of prognosis and management.

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare primary cutaneous neuroendocrine tumour. While dermally invasive MCC is known to have a five-year survival of only 30-40%, the prognosis and management of MCC in situ (MCCis) is not widely reported. OBJECTIVE: We present a systematic review to elucidate the prognosis and management of MCCis. METHODS: We performed a systematic review, searching three databases to 01 June 2021. Case reports, cohort studies, clinical trials and literature reviews were considered for inclusion. RESULTS: We identified 26 cases of MCCis published in the literature with a median age of 74 years and involving 19 males and 7 females. Most cases were on the face and neck (n = 17), followed by upper limb (n = 8) and lower limb (n = 1). Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in three patients, and all were negative. One subject underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. No MCCis-associated deaths were reported. CONCLUSION: This review suggests that MCCis has an excellent prognosis with minimal, if any, risk of mortality and a very low risk of dermal invasion and recurrence when treated with wide local excision alone. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is unlikely to be useful for MCCis.

Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Cited Publications.

BACKGROUND: Bibliometric studies provide a quantitative statistical analysis of the published literature within a field of interest and allow for easy identification of the major contributing authors, funding sources, and publication trends within the field. To date, no bibliometric studies have been performed pertaining to Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). OBJECTIVE: To identify the 100 most frequently cited articles in MCC through a bibliometric analysis of the literature. METHODS: Web of science was queried to determine the 100 most frequently cited MCC publications published between the years 1970 and 2019. Articles were listed by title, authors and their affiliated institutions, journal title and type, year of publication, country of origin, funding sources, and citation frequency. RESULTS: Among the 100 most frequently cited MCC publications, articles were cited between 67 and 589 times with a mean of 136.3 times. Articles were cited between 2.0 and 98.2 times per year since publication with a mean of 11.3 times per year. 67% of the articles were published in oncology journals; 33% and 10% of the articles in dermatology and surgery journals, respectively. The most represented journal was Cancer (12%). Paul Nghiem was the most frequently identified author (18%). 36% of the top 100 articles were published out of the University of Washington. The most frequent funding agency was the National Institutes of Health (77%). CONCLUSION: Through this bibliometric analysis, researchers can easily identify key publications pertaining to MCC, which may in turn enhance their approach to understanding and practicing evidence-based medicine regarding MCC.

Effects of surgery on survival of patients aged 75 years or older with Merkel cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether surgery improves prognosis in elderly patients with Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). MATERIALS/METHODS: Data of all patients with MCC diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Differences in baseline characteristics were analyzed among the age groups (75-80, 80-85, and ≥85 years). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to assess the effects of each variable on patient outcomes. The Kaplan-Meier curves were employed to evaluate MCC overall survival (OS) and MCC-specific survival (MSS). RESULTS: A total of 1156 of patients with MCC met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The surgery rate decreased with age (75-80, 80-85, and ≥85 years were 93.3%, 91.1%, and 88.7%, respectively; p = 0.082). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that the OS of patients in the 80-85 years group (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.14-1.70; p = 0.001) and the ≥85 years group (HR = 2.18; 95% CI = 1.80-2.63; p < 0.0001) was worse than that in the 75-80 years group. Compared with the non-surgery groups, the HR for the surgery group was 0.75 for OS (95% CI = 0.56-1.00; p = 0.048) and 0.73 for MSS (95% CI = 0.48-1.10; p = 0.130). Subgroup analyses showed that patients aged ≥85 years undergoing surgery had better OS (HR = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.45-0.95; p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: MCC patients aged 75 years and older would benefit from surgical resection. However, surgical resection should be performed cautiously, and larger prospective clinical trials are needed to further verify these findings.

Merkel cell carcinoma in Turkey: A multicentric study.

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare but highly aggressive neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment outcomes, and survival of MCC cases in Turkey. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients diagnosed with MCC between 1999 and 2018 at twenty different centers in Turkey were included in the study. Patient and tumor characteristics and adjuvant and metastatis treatment outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The median age of totally 89 patients was 70 (26-93). The most common primary location was lower limbs (n = 29, 32.5%). Immunohistochemically, CK20 positivity was present in 59 patients (66.3%). Only two patients had secondary malignancy. The majority of the patients (n = 76, 85.4%) were diagnosed at the localized stage. Surgery was performed for all patients in the early stage, and adjuvant radiotherapy or/and chemotherapy was applied to 52.6% (n = 40) of nonmetastatic patients. The median follow-up was 29 months. Recurrence developed in 21 (27.6%) of the 76 patients who presented with local or regional disease. Two-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 68.1% and 5-year DFS was 62.0% for localized stage. The 5-year DFS was similar for patients receiving adjuvant treatment (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or sequential chemoradiotherapy) and without adjuvant therapy (P > 0.05). Two-year overall survival in patients who presented with localized disease was 71.3% and 18.5% in metastatic patients (P < 0.001). In the metastatic stage, platinum/etoposide combination was the most preferred combination regimen. Median progression-free survival (PFS) in first-line chemotherapy was 7 months (95% confidence interval: 3.5-10.5 months; standart error: 1.78). CONCLUSIONS: Although MCC is rare in Turkey, the incidence is increasing. Gender, CK20 status, tumor size, lymph node involvement, and adjuvant treatment were not associated with recurrence.

Systematic literature review of current treatments for stage I-III Merkel cell carcinoma.

Aim: There is a need to evaluate current treatments for stages I-III of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). Materials & methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to understand how patients with stage I-III MCC are treated and assess efficacy, safety, health-related quality of life and economic impact of current therapies. Embase was searched using the following inclusion criteria: publications from 2014 to 2019, in English, with adult patients (≥18 years) with early-stage MCC (i.e., stages I-III) and any interventions/comparators. Publications were excluded if they included only patients with stage IV MCC, had no distinction between early and advanced or metastatic MCC or had no extractable data. Results: A total of 18 retrospective studies were included. Few studies had evidence that surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy significantly increased survival versus surgery alone in early MCC. Limited safety data were reported in three studies. None of the studies reported data on health-related quality of life or economic impact of treatment in patients with early-stage MCC. Conclusion: Although surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy was a common treatment, no clear standard of care exists for stages I-III MCC and treatment outcomes need to be improved. All studies were retrospective with a high variability in sample sizes; hence, findings should be interpreted with caution.

LRIG1 is a positive prognostic marker in Merkel cell carcinoma and Merkel cell carcinoma expresses epithelial stem cell markers.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive neuroendocrine malignancy of the skin. The cell of origin of MCC is thus far unknown and proposed cells of origin include Merkel cells, pro-/pre- or pre-B cells, epithelial stem cells, and dermal stem cells. In this study, we aimed to shed further light on the possibility that a subset of MCC tumors arise from epithelial stem cells of the skin by examining the expression of hair follicle and epidermal stem cell markers in MCC and normal human skin. We also aimed to elucidate any correlation between the expression of these markers and tumor Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) status or other clinicopathological characteristics or patient survival. Expression of CK19, SOX9, LGR5, and LRIG1 in MCC and normal human skin was studied by immunohistochemistry, and the staining patterns or intensities were statistically correlated with patient, tumor, MCPyV, and survival parameters. In a cohort of 137 cases of MCC, we observed dot-like immunoexpression of CK19 in 30 cases (22.1%) and homogeneous expression in 103 cases (75.7%). We also observed positive immunoexpression of SOX9 in 21 cases (15.3%), LGR5 in 118 cases (86.1%), and LRIG1 in 117 cases (86.0%). Immunoexpression of LRIG1 was found to correlate with better overall and MCC-specific survival. We observed frequent immunoexpression of several hair follicle and epidermal stem cell markers in MCC and found LRIG1 to be a positive prognostic marker in MCC.