RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Little is known about factors contributing to burnout and intent to leave in cardiologists and other cardiology health care workers. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Coping With COVID survey assessed work conditions, burnout, and intent to leave among physicians, nurses, advanced practice providers, and other clinical staff (OCS) from April 2020 to December 2020. Single-item measures assessed work conditions, burnout (emotional exhaustion), and intent to leave. Multilevel logistic regression examined work life variables' relationships to burnout among role types and feeling valued as a mediator. Open-ended comments analyzed via grounded theory contributed to a conceptual model. Coping With COVID was completed by 1199 US cardiology health care workers (354 physician/520 nurses/198 advanced practice providers/127 OCS). Nurses were most likely to report burnout (59% nurses, 57% OCS, 46% advanced practice providers, 40% physicians, P<0.0001). Workload correlated with burnout in all groups (adjusted odds ratios [aORs], 4.1-17.4; Ps<0.005), whereas anxiety/depression related to burnout in all except OCS (aORs, 3.9-8.3; Ps≤0.001). Feeling valued was related to lower burnout in most groups. Intent to leave was common (23%-45%) and was lower in physicians and advanced practice providers who felt valued (aORs, 0.26 and 0.22, respectively; Ps<0.05). Burnout was highest for nurses in practice 16 to 20 years, and intent to leave was highest for OCS in practice 16 to 20 years. Themes contributing to burnout included personal and patient safety, leadership, and financial issues. CONCLUSIONS: Burnout was prevalent among cardiology health care workers and highest in nurses and OCS. Addressing factors associated with burnout in different role types may improve work life sustainability for all cardiology health care workers.
Assuntos
Esgotamento Profissional , COVID-19 , Cardiologistas , Local de Trabalho , Humanos , Esgotamento Profissional/epidemiologia , Esgotamento Profissional/psicologia , Masculino , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/psicologia , Feminino , Cardiologistas/psicologia , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Local de Trabalho/psicologia , Satisfação no Emprego , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Intenção , SARS-CoV-2 , Adaptação Psicológica , Cardiologia , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Carga de Trabalho , Reorganização de Recursos Humanos/estatística & dados numéricos , Condições de TrabalhoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Fetal cardiac anomalies are the most commonly diagnosed structural anomalies. In these cases, Maternal-Fetal Medicine (MFM) specialists are tasked with counseling patients on a spectrum of diagnoses as well as their prognostic implications. A recent study of pediatric cardiologists demonstrated that personal beliefs regarding termination impact the counseling provided to patients. Our objective was to study whether the personal beliefs of MFMs impact counseling of patients with severe fetal cardiac anomalies and to compare these providers to their cardiology counterparts. METHODS: We conducted an anonymous cross-sectional survey of MFMs in New England that assessed personal beliefs and counseling practices when diagnosing hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS). We subsequently compared these providers to the previously surveyed cardiologists. RESULTS: A total of 34 respondents representing a broad spectrum of age and experience across several states in New England were analyzed. When presented with the statement "some life is always better than no life at all," 79% (n = 27) of respondents disagreed and all respondents (n = 34) offered termination, palliative care, and treatment options when counseling patients with HLHS. Additionally, while 74% (n = 25) of providers would personally support a decision to terminate a pregnancy with HLHS, 94% (n = 32) would professionally support the decision to pursue termination.MFMs and cardiologists differed in their responses to "some life is better than no life" and the belief that termination should be offered, though differences did not reach statistical significance. However, with respect to the providers' personal and professional support of the decision to terminate the pregnancy, the groups of respondents varied significantly in their level of support, both professionally and personally with fewer cardiologists supporting this decision. CONCLUSION: When diagnosing a severe and potentially fatal congenital cardiac anomaly, counseling by MFMs was largely unaffected by personal beliefs regarding termination of pregnancy. While this is consistent with previously published data on counseling practices among pediatric cardiology specialists, some important differences between the specialties were seen.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Aconselhamento , Humanos , Feminino , Estudos Transversais , Gravidez , Adulto , Síndrome do Coração Esquerdo Hipoplásico/terapia , Síndrome do Coração Esquerdo Hipoplásico/diagnóstico , Masculino , New England , Inquéritos e Questionários , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obstetrícia/educação , Médicos/psicologia , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Cardiologistas/psicologia , Cardiologistas/educaçãoRESUMO
The frequency of burnout is rising among cardiologists, affecting not only their well-being but also the quality of patient care. Computerization of practice, bureaucracy, excessive workload, lack of control/autonomy, hostile and hectic work environments, insufficient income, and work life imbalance are the main categories listed as contributing factors to cardiologists' burnout. Organization- and physician-directed interventions can be impactful; however, the effectiveness and feasibility of these interventions have rarely been assessed in cardiology. This review summarizes recent publications on burnout in cardiology, discusses the contributing factors and implications of burnout on physicians' health and patient safety, and explores possible interventions.
Assuntos
Esgotamento Profissional , Cardiologia , Humanos , Esgotamento Profissional/psicologia , Esgotamento Profissional/epidemiologia , Esgotamento Profissional/etiologia , Cardiologistas/psicologia , Carga de Trabalho/psicologiaAssuntos
Cardiologistas , Humanos , Cardiologistas/psicologia , Saúde Mental , Padrões de Prática MédicaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mental illness among physicians is an increasingly recognized concern. Global data on mental health conditions (MHCs) among cardiologists are limited. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the global prevalence of MHCs among cardiologists and its relationships to professional life. METHODS: The American College of Cardiology conducted an online survey with 5,931 cardiologists globally in 2019. Data on demographics, practice, MHC, and association with professional activities were analyzed. The P values were calculated using the chi-square, Fischer exact, and Mann-Whitney U tests. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis determined the association of characteristics with MHC. RESULTS: Globally, 1 in 4 cardiologists experience any self-reported MHC, including psychological distress, or major or other psychiatric disorder. There is significant geographic variation in MHCs, with highest and lowest prevalences in South America (39.3%) and Asia (20.1%) (P < 0.001). Predictors of MHCs included experiencing emotional harassment (OR: 2.81; 95% CI: 2.46-3.20), discrimination (OR: 1.85; 95% CI: 1.61-2.12), being divorced (OR: 1.85; 95% CI: 1.27-2.36), and age <55 years (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.24-1.66). Women were more likely to consider suicide within the past 12 months (3.8% vs 2.3%), but were also more likely to seek help (42.3% vs 31.1%) as compared with men (all P < 0.001). Nearly one-half of cardiologists reporting MHCs (44%) felt dissatisfied on at least one professional metric including feeling valued, treated fairly, and adequate compensation. CONCLUSIONS: More than 1 in 4 cardiologists experience self-reported MHCs globally, and the association with adverse experiences in professional life is substantial. Dedicated efforts toward prevention and treatment are needed to maximize the contributions of affected cardiologists.
Assuntos
Cardiologistas , Cardiologia , Transtornos Mentais , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Saúde Mental , Cardiologistas/psicologia , Prevalência , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologiaAssuntos
Cardiologistas , Cardiologia , Humanos , Cardiologistas/psicologia , Saúde Mental , Atitude do Pessoal de SaúdeAssuntos
Esgotamento Profissional/epidemiologia , Esgotamento Profissional/psicologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Cardiologistas/psicologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Recursos Humanos , Esgotamento Profissional/diagnóstico , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Cardiologistas/tendências , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Pessoal de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Pandemias , Recursos Humanos/tendênciasRESUMO
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has changed the lives of healthcare professionals, especially vulnerable physicians such as young or female cardiologists. In Japan, they are facing the fear of not only infection but also weak and unstable employment, difficulties in medical practice and training anxiety, implications for research and studying abroad, as well as worsened mental health issues due to social isolation. Conversely, some positive aspects are seen through the holding of remote meetings and conferences. Here, we suggest a new working style for cardiologists, as well as offer solutions to the medical employment problems that have been taken place in Japan.
Assuntos
COVID-19/psicologia , Cardiologistas/psicologia , Saúde Ocupacional , Médicas/psicologia , Fatores Etários , Ansiedade/etiologia , Ansiedade/terapia , Pesquisa Biomédica/métodos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Cardiologistas/educação , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Emprego , Feminino , Humanos , Japão , Saúde Mental , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Doenças Profissionais/terapia , Distanciamento Físico , Sexismo/psicologia , Isolamento Social/psicologia , Apoio Social , Populações VulneráveisRESUMO
CoronaVIrus Disease-19 (COVID-19) had a huge impact on human health and economy. However, to this date, the effects of the pandemic on the training of young cardiologists are only partially known. To assess the consequences of the pandemic on the education of the cardiologists in training, we performed a 23-item national survey that has been delivered to 1443 Italian cardiologists in training, registered in the database of the Italian Society of Cardiology (SIC). Six hundred and thirty-three cardiologists in training participated in the survey. Ninety-five percent of the respondents affirmed that the training programme has been somewhat stopped or greatly jeopardized by the pandemic. For 61% of the fellows in training (FITs), the pandemic had a negative effect on their education. Moreover, 59% of the respondents believe that they would not be able to fill the gap gained during that period over the rest of their training. A negative impact on the psycho-physical well being has been reported by 86% of the FITs. The COVID-19 pandemic had an unparalleled impact on the education, formation and mental state of the cardiologists in training. Regulatory agencies, universities and politicians should make a great effort in the organization and reorganization of the teaching programs of the cardiologists of tomorrow.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Cardiologistas , Cardiologia/educação , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Educação , Internato e Residência , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Cardiologistas/educação , Cardiologistas/psicologia , Cardiologistas/normas , Competência Clínica/normas , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/métodos , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/organização & administração , Educação/organização & administração , Educação/normas , Bolsas de Estudo/métodos , Bolsas de Estudo/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Internato e Residência/métodos , Internato e Residência/organização & administração , Internato e Residência/normas , Itália/epidemiologia , Avaliação das Necessidades , SARS-CoV-2 , Sociedades Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosAssuntos
Cardiologistas/normas , Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Diversidade Cultural , Papel Profissional , Racismo/prevenção & controle , Cardiologistas/psicologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etnologia , Mão de Obra em Saúde/normas , Humanos , Papel Profissional/psicologia , Racismo/etnologia , Racismo/psicologiaAssuntos
COVID-19/patologia , Tomada de Decisão Compartilhada , Volta ao Esporte , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/virologia , Cardiologistas/psicologia , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/etiologia , Humanos , Miocardite/complicações , Miocardite/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificaçãoRESUMO
Background Women represent an increasing percentage of interventional cardiologists in Italy compared with other countries. However, gaps exist in understanding and adapting to the impact of these changing demographics. Methods and Results We performed a national survey to analyze demographics, gender-based professional difference, needs in terms of catheterization laboratory (Cath-Lab) abstention, and radiation safety issues in Italian Cath-Lab settings. A survey supported by the Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (Società Italiana di Cardiologia Interventistica-Gruppo Italiano di Studi Emodinamici SICI-GISE) was mailed to all SICI-GISE members. Categorical data were compared using the χ2 test. P<0.05 was considered significant. There were 326 respondents: 20.2% were <35 years old, and 64.4% had >10 years of Cath-Lab experience. Notably, 26.4% were women. Workload was not gender-influenced (women performed "on-call" duty 69.8% versus men 68.3%; P=0.97). Women were more frequently unmarried (22.1% women versus 8.7% men; P=0.002) and childless (43.9% versus 56.1%; P<0.001). Interestingly, 69.8% of women versus 44.6% of men (P<0.001) argued that pregnancy/breastfeeding negatively impacts professional skill development and career advancement. For Cath-Lab abstention, 38.9% and 69.6% of respondents considered it useful to perform percutaneous coronary intervention robotic simulations and "refresh-skill" sessions while they were absent or on return to work, respectively, without gender differences. Overall, 80% of respondents described current radioprotection counseling efforts as inadequate and not gender specific. Finally, 26.7% faced some type of job discrimination, a significantly higher proportion of whom were women. Conclusions Several gender-based differences exist or are perceived to exist among interventional cardiologists in Italian Cath-Labs. Joint strategies addressing Cath-Lab abstention and radiation exposure education should be developed to promote gender equity in interventional cardiologists.
Assuntos
Adaptação Psicológica , Cateterismo Cardíaco/estatística & dados numéricos , Cardiologistas/psicologia , Laboratórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Cateterismo Cardíaco/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Relações Interpessoais , Itália , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores SexuaisAssuntos
COVID-19 , Cardiologistas/psicologia , Estresse Psicológico , Cardiologistas/educação , Humanos , Pandemias , EspanhaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Burnout and distress have a negative impact on physicians and the treatment they provide. Our aim was to measure the prevalence of burnout and distress among physicians in a cardiovascular centre of a quaternary hospital network in Canada, and compare these outcomes to those for physicians at academic health science centres (AHSCs) in the United States. METHODS: We conducted a survey of physicians practising in a cardiovascular centre at 2 quaternary referral hospitals in Toronto, Ontario, between Nov. 27, 2018, and Jan. 31, 2019. The survey tool included the Well-Being Index (WBI), which measures fatigue, depression, burnout, anxiety or stress, mental and physical quality of life, work-life integration, meaning in work and distress; a score of 3 or higher indicated high distress. We also evaluated physicians' perception of the adequacy of staffing levels and of fair treatment in the workplace, and satisfaction with the electronic health record. We carried out standard univariate statistical comparisons using the χ2, Fisher exact or Kruskal-Wallis test as appropriate to perform univariate comparisons in the sample of respondents. We assessed the relation between a WBI score of 3 or higher and demographic characteristics. We compared univariate associations among WBI data for physicians at AHSCs in the US who completed the WBI to responses from our participants. RESULTS: The response rate to the survey was 84.1% (127/151). Of the 127 respondents, 83 (65.4%) reported burnout in the previous month, and 68 (53.5%) reported emotional problems. Sixty-nine respondents (54.3%) had a WBI score of 3 or higher. Respondents were more likely to have a WBI score of 3 or higher versus a score less than 3 if they perceived insufficient staffing levels (52/69 [75%] v. 26/58 [45%], p = 0.02) or unfair treatment (23/69 [33%] v. 8/58 [14%], p = 0.03), or were anesthesiologists (26/35 [74%] v. 43/92 [47%] for other specialists, p = 0.005). Compared to 21 594 physicians in practice at AHSCs in the US, our respondents had a higher mean WBI score (2.4 v. 1.8, p = 0.004) and reported a higher prevalence of burnout (65.4% v. 56.6%, p = 0.048). INTERPRETATION: Physicians in this study had high levels of burnout and distress, driven by the perception of inadequate staffing levels and being treated unfairly in the workplace. Addressing these institutional factors may improve physicians' work experience and patient outcomes.
Assuntos
Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Esgotamento Profissional/epidemiologia , Institutos de Cardiologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Fadiga/epidemiologia , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade de Vida , Anestesiologistas/psicologia , Anestesiologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Ansiedade/psicologia , Esgotamento Profissional/psicologia , Cardiologistas/psicologia , Cardiologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Depressão/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Satisfação no Emprego , Masculino , Sistemas Multi-Institucionais , Ontário/epidemiologia , Admissão e Escalonamento de Pessoal , Médicos/psicologia , Angústia Psicológica , Radiologistas/psicologia , Radiologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgiões/psicologia , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Cirurgia Torácica , Equilíbrio Trabalho-VidaAssuntos
COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/terapia , Cardiologistas/psicologia , Cardiologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Consulta Remota/estatística & dados numéricos , Telemedicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Atitude Frente aos Computadores , Cardiologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polônia , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The The Roadmap Using Story Telling project used a narrative medicine (NM) framework to assess the perspectives of people with heart failure (HF), their informal caregivers and HF specialists of the impact of HF on the daily life of patients and their carers. METHODS: Italian HF specialists participated on a voluntary basis, completing their own narratives, and inviting patients and their caregivers to write anonymously about their experiences, all on a dedicated online platform. The narratives were analyzed according to standard NM methodology. RESULTS: 82 narratives were collected from patients, 61 from caregivers, and 104 from HF specialists. Analysis of the three points of view revealed the extent of the burden of illness on the entire family, particularly that of the caregiver. The impact was mainly experienced as emotional and social limitations in patients' and their caregivers' daily lives. The analysis of all three points of view highlighted a strong difference between how HF is perceived by patients, caregivers, and HF specialists. CONCLUSIONS: This NM project illustrates the complex issues of living with HF and gave insights to integrate three different perspectives into the HF pathway of care.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Cardiologistas/psicologia , Cuidadores/psicologia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Emoções , Insuficiência Cardíaca/psicologia , Medicina Narrativa , Pacientes/psicologia , Comportamento Social , Atividades Cotidianas , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Relações Médico-Paciente , Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cardiology fellows, in particular, are in a unique position to mold the new cardiovascular workforce, especially in terms of risk prevention. There is a growing need for the cardiovascular workforce. In the United States, one person dies every forty-two seconds due to a cardiovascular adverse event. METHODS: A PRISMA systematic review included comprehensive search of the MED-LINE database (PubMed) from 1927 to 2020 - the oldest to newest available literature on the subject available through PubMed. RESULTS: Fifty-seven cardiology fellows together interpreted a total of 1719 EKGs with a correct rate of 52%. Sixty-four fellows completed a total of 1363 echocardiography interpretations with an accuracy rate of nearly 75%. CONCLUSION: Based on the studies discussed, it is evident that a cardiology fellow, particularly in their early years of training, may be limited due to a lack of experience. With continued EKG and echocardiogram interpretation, as well as other clinical skills practice, fellows can improve their diagnostic accuracy and procedural efficiency.