Efficacy of empirical Ciprofloxacin or Cefixime plus Metronidazole therapy for the treatment of liver abscess: a randomized control clinical trial.

Liver abscess is a potentially life-threatening medical emergency. Prompt empirical antimicrobial with or without percutaneous aspiration or drainage is therapeutic. The rational for using empirical intravenous broad-spectrum antimicrobials upfront instead of oral Fluoroquinolone or Cephalosporin is contentious. In this double blind randomized control clinical trial 69 participants received Ciprofloxacin (500 mg q 12 hourly) and 71 participants received Cefixime (200 mg q 12 hourly) orally for 2 weeks. Both the group received oral Metronidazole (800 mg q 8 hourly) for 2 weeks and percutaneous drainage or aspiration of the abscess was done as per indication and followed-up for 8 weeks. Out of 140 participants, 89.3% (N = 125) achieved clinical cure, 59 (85.5%) in Ciprofloxacin group and 66 (93%) in Cefixime group (p = 0.154). Mean duration of antimicrobial therapy was 16.2 ± 4.3 days, 15.1 ± 4.5 days in Ciprofloxacin group and 16.0 ± 4.2 days in Cefixime group (p = 0.223). Total 15 (10.7%) participants had treatment failure, 10 (14.5%) in Ciprofloxacin group and 5 (7.0%) in Cefixime group (p = 0.154). The most common reason for treatment failure was need of prolong (> 4 weeks) antimicrobial therapy due to persistent hepatic collection requiring drainage, which was significantly (p = 0.036) higher in Ciprofloxacin (14.5%, N = 10) group, compared to the Cefixime (4.2%, N = 3) group. In conclusion, both, the Ciprofloxacin or Cefixime plus Metronidazole for duration of 2-3 weeks were efficacious as empirical oral antimicrobial regimen along with prompt percutaneous drainage or aspiration for the treatment of uncomplicated liver abscess with similar efficacy. Oral Cefixime was better than Ciprofloxacin in term of lesser chance of treatment failure due to persistent collection which is required to be investigated further in larger clinical trial.Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov PRS ID: NCT03969758, 31/05/2019.

Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates among individuals at high risk for sexually transmitted diseases in Zurich, Switzerland.

BACKGROUND: While ceftriaxone resistance remains scarce in Switzerland, global Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) antimicrobial resistance poses an urgent threat. This study describes clinical characteristics in MSM (men who have sex with men) diagnosed with NG infection and analyses NG resistance by phenotypic and genotypic means. METHODS: Data of MSM enrolled in three clinical cohorts with a positive polymerase chain reaction test (PCR) for NG were analysed between January 2019 and December 2021 and linked with antibiotic susceptibility testing. Bacterial isolates were subjected to whole genome sequencing (WGS). RESULTS: Of 142 participants, 141 (99%) were MSM and 118 (84%) living with HIV. Participants were treated with ceftriaxone (N = 79), azithromycin (N = 2), or a combination of both (N = 61). No clinical or microbiological failures were observed. From 182 positive PCR samples taken, 23 were available for detailed analysis. Based on minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs), all isolates were susceptible to ceftriaxone, gentamicin, cefixime, cefpodoxime, ertapenem, zoliflodacin, and spectinomycin. Resistance to azithromycin, tetracyclines and ciprofloxacin was observed in 10 (43%), 23 (100%) and 11 (48%) of the cases, respectively. Analysis of WGS data revealed combinations of resistance determinants that matched with the corresponding phenotypic resistance pattern of each isolate. CONCLUSION: Among the MSM diagnosed with NG mainly acquired in Switzerland, ceftriaxone MICs were low for a subset of bacterial isolates studied and no treatment failures were observed. For azithromycin, high occurrences of in vitro resistance were found. Gentamicin, cefixime, cefpodoxime, ertapenem, spectinomycin, and zoliflodacin displayed excellent in vitro activity against the 23 isolates underscoring their potential as alternative agents to ceftriaxone.

Single-dose cefixime 800 mg plus doxycycline 100 mg twice a day for 7 days compared with single-dose ceftriaxone 1 g plus single-dose azithromycin 2 g for treatment of urogenital, rectal, and pharyngeal gonorrhoea: a randomised clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a single dose of oral cefixime 800 mg plus oral doxycycline 100 mg twice a day for 7 days, compared with a recommended single dose of ceftriaxone plus single dose of oral azithromycin, for treatment of uncomplicated urogenital, rectal, or pharyngeal gonorrhoea. METHODS: A noninferiority, open-label, multicentre randomized controlled trial was conducted in Prague, Czech Republic. Some 161 patients, 18-65 years of age diagnosed with uncomplicated urogenital, rectal, or pharyngeal gonorrhoea by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) were randomized to treatment with single dose of cefixime 800 mg plus doxycycline 100 mg twice a day for 1 week or a single dose of ceftriaxone 1 g intramuscularly plus single dose of azithromycin 2 g. The primary outcome was the number of participants with negative culture and NAAT at 1 week and 3 weeks, respectively, after treatment initiation. RESULTS: In all, 161 patients were randomized and 152 were included in per-protocol analyses. All 76 (100%; 95% CI, 0.95-1.00) patients treated with ceftriaxone plus azithromycin achieved negative cultures and NAAT after treatment. In the cefixime plus doxycycline arm at week 1, culture was negative in all 76 (100%) patients; at week 3, culture was negative in 70 of the 76 patients (92%; 95% CI, 0.84-0.97) and NAAT negative in 66 of the 76 patients (87%; 95% CI, 0.77-0.94). At week 3, culture and NAAT were negative in 65 of the 76 patients (86%; 95% CI, 0.76-0.93). Per-protocol risk difference was 14.5%; 95% CI, 6.56-22.38. All treatment failures observed in the cefixime arm were pharyngeal gonorrhoea cases. DISCUSSION: The combination of cefixime and doxycycline did not achieve noninferiority to ceftriaxone and azithromycin for treatment of gonorrhoea when including pharyngeal gonorrhoea. It did, however, show high efficacy for urogenital and rectal gonorrhoea.

The third nationwide surveillance of antimicrobial susceptibility against Neisseria gonorrhoeae from male urethritis in Japan, 2016-2017.

Neisseria gonorrhoeae is one of the important pathogens of sexually transmitted infections. N. gonorrhoeae is rapidly becoming antimicrobial resistant, and there are few drugs that are effective in the initial treatment of gonorrhea. To understand the trends of antimicrobial susceptibility of N. gonorrhoeae, the Surveillance Committee of the Japanese Society of Infectious Diseases, the Japanese Society for Chemotherapy, and the Japanese Society of Clinical Microbiology conducted the third nationwide antimicrobial susceptibility surveillance of N. gonorrhoeae isolated from male urethritis. The specimens were collected from male patients with urethritis at 30 facilities from May 2016 to July 2017. From the 159 specimens collected, 87 N. gonorrhoeae strains were isolated, and 85 were tested for susceptibility to 21 antimicrobial agents. All strains were non-susceptible to penicillin G. Seven strains (8.2%) were ß-lactamase-producing strains. The rates of susceptibility to cefixime and cefpodoxime were 96.5% and 52.9%, respectively. Three strains were non-susceptible with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 0.5 mg/L for cefixime. None of the strains were resistant to ceftriaxone or spectinomycin. The susceptibility rate for ciprofloxacin was 23.5% (20 strains), and no strains showed intermediate susceptibility. The susceptibility rate against azithromycin was 81.2%, with one strain isolated with a MIC of 8 mg/L against azithromycin. The results of this surveillance indicate that ceftriaxone and spectinomycin, which are currently recommended for gonococcal infections in Japan, appear to be effective. It will be necessary to further expand the scale of the next surveillance to understand the current status of drug-resistant N. gonorrhoeae in Japan.

Effects of Cefixime on Immune Functions and Inflammatory Factors in Children with Urinary Tract Infection and Targeted Nursing Strategies.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the effects of cefixime on immune functions and inflammatory factors in children with urinary tract infection and to investigate its nursing strategies. METHODS: A total of 161 children with urinary tract infection who were diagnosed in our hospital from November 2019 to November 2021 were selected. All children were treated with cefixime and received targeted nursing strategies. The indices of immune functions and the levels of inflammatory factors were compared before and after the treatment. The satisfaction degree of children's family members, recurrence rate and incidence of adverse reactions were measured. RESULTS: The levels of CD3+, CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ in children after the treatment were significantly higher but the CD8+ level was significantly lower than those before the treatment (p < 0.001). The levels of C-reactive protein, tumour necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6 after the treatment were lower than those before the treatment (p < 0.001). The average score of nursing satisfaction of children's family members was (84.53 ± 13.65) points, with the total satisfaction degree of 90.68% (146/161). Within 6 months after the treatment, only six children had urinary tract infection again and the recurrence rate was 3.73% (6/161). During the treatment, seven children had adverse reactions to the drug, with an incidence rate of 4.35% (7/161). CONCLUSIONS: Cefixime can improve the immune function of children with urinary tract infection and reduce the levels of inflammatory factors. The implementation of targeted nursing strategies can improve clinical satisfaction and reduce the recurrence rate of the disease and thus can be helpful to establish a comprehensive and efficient clinical program for children with urinary tract infection.

Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling and Genome Analysis of the penA-60.001 Neisseria gonorrhoeae Clinical Isolates in China in 2021.

BACKGROUND: Neisseria gonorrhoeae antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an urgent public health threat. With dissemination of FC428-related clones, the efficacy of ceftriaxone has become controversial. METHODS: Agar dilution and whole genome sequencing were used to analyze AMR. RESULTS: High resistance to penicillin (75.2%), tetracycline (87.9%), ciprofloxacin (98.3%), ceftriaxone (8.9%), cefixime (14.3%), and azithromycin (8.6%) was observed among 463 isolates first collected in China in 2021. All penA-60.001 clones exhibited resistance to ceftriaxone or cefixime, and 1 of the 12 cases was resistant to azithromycin. ngMAST and ngSTAR of penA-60.001 isolates showed that single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the porB, tbpB, ponA, gyrA, and parC genes were the major causes of different sequence types. MLST-7365 (n = 5) and MLST-1903 (n = 3) were main genotypes, and the other 4 strains featured MLST-10314, MLST-13871, MLST-7827 and MLST-1600. Furthermore, resistance markers (eg, penA, blaTEM-1, blaTEM-135) and virus factors were detected. Most penA-60.001 strains were fully mixed with global FC428-related clones; 2021-A2 and F89 had the same origin; and 2021-A1 exhibited a unique evolutionary trajectory. CONCLUSIONS: Results provide the first demonstration of extremely severe AMR rates of N gonorrhoeae in China in 2021, particularly strains with ceftriaxone decreased susceptibility. The sustained transmission of penA-60.001 subclones might further threaten treatment effectiveness.

Projecting the development of antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae from antimicrobial surveillance data: a mathematical modelling study.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization recommends changing the first-line antimicrobial treatment for gonorrhoea when ≥ 5% of Neisseria gonorrhoeae cases fail treatment or are resistant. Susceptibility to ceftriaxone, the last remaining treatment option has been decreasing in many countries. We used antimicrobial resistance surveillance data and developed mathematical models to project the time to reach the 5% threshold for resistance to first-line antimicrobials used for N. gonorrhoeae. METHODS: We used data from the Gonococcal Resistance to Antimicrobials Surveillance Programme (GRASP) in England and Wales from 2000-2018 about minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, cefixime and ceftriaxone and antimicrobial treatment in two groups, heterosexual men and women (HMW) and men who have sex with men (MSM). We developed two susceptible-infected-susceptible models to fit these data and produce projections of the proportion of resistance until 2030. The single-step model represents the situation in which a single mutation results in antimicrobial resistance. In the multi-step model, the sequential accumulation of resistance mutations is reflected by changes in the MIC distribution. RESULTS: The single-step model described resistance to ciprofloxacin well. Both single-step and multi-step models could describe azithromycin and cefixime resistance, with projected resistance levels higher with the multi-step than the single step model. For ceftriaxone, with very few observed cases of full resistance, the multi-step model was needed to describe long-term dynamics of resistance. Extrapolating from the observed upward drift in MIC values, the multi-step model projected ≥ 5% resistance to ceftriaxone could be reached by 2030, based on treatment pressure alone. Ceftriaxone resistance was projected to rise to 13.2% (95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.7-44.8%) among HMW and 19.6% (95%CrI: 2.6-54.4%) among MSM by 2030. CONCLUSIONS: New first-line antimicrobials for gonorrhoea treatment are needed. In the meantime, public health authorities should strengthen surveillance for AMR in N. gonorrhoeae and implement strategies for continued antimicrobial stewardship. Our models show the utility of long-term representative surveillance of gonococcal antimicrobial susceptibility data and can be adapted for use in, and for comparison with, other countries.

Emergence of a predominant sequence type ST7363 and the increasing trend of resistance to cefixime and ceftriaxone in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Southern Taiwan, 2019-2021.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Multi-drug resistance and the presence of epidemic lineages of Neisseria gonorrhoeae locally and globally were important clinical and public health issues. We aimed to investigate the molecular epidemiology and the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of N. gonorrhoeae in Southern Taiwan. METHODS: Between 2019 and 2021, adult patients who had suspected gonorrhea and attended a urology clinic in southern Taiwan were recruited to participate in this study. Clinical data from medical records and a questionnaire, antimicrobial susceptibility testing using a disk diffusion test in accordance with the guidelines by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, and Multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 500 patients participated in the surveillance study. Among them, 232 N. gonorrhoeae isolates were identified, but only 164 isolates were recovered for further research. ST7363 (n = 83, 50.61%) was found to be the predominant sequence type, followed by ST1583 (n = 24, 14.63%), ST1588 (n = 13, 7.93%), and ST7827 (n = 12, 7.32%). 100% resistance to penicillin and 99.4% non-susceptible rate of ciprofloxacin were observed. The azithromycin resistant rate being 15.24% and the cefixime non-susceptible rate being 17.07% were alarming, both with decreasing trends in susceptibilities during 2019-2021. The 25 azithromycin resistant isolates were mainly belonged to ST7363 (n = 12) and ST7827 (n = 3). Seven (4.2%) isolates were ceftriaxone non-susceptible. Among them, four were assigned to be ST 7827 and three belonged to ST7363. CONCLUSION: We observed the emergence of a predominant sequence type ST7363 in southern Taiwan. Compared with previous Taiwan studies, the increasing trend of resistance to cefixime and ceftriaxone necessitates clinicians' alertness for clinical treatment response of the extended spectrum cephalosporins and the further surveillance monitor.

Is there an association between previous infection with Neisseria gonorrhoeae and gonococcal AMR? A cross-sectional analysis of national and sentinel surveillance data in England, 2015-2019.

OBJECTIVES: Quarterly STI screening is recommended for high-risk gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (MSM) in the UK, but frequent antibiotic exposure could potentially increase the risk of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) developing in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. We investigated whether repeat diagnosis of gonorrhoea in those attending sexual health services (SHS) was associated with reduced antimicrobial susceptibility. METHODS: Antimicrobial susceptibility data relating to the most recent gonorrhoea diagnosis for each individual included in the Gonococcal Resistance to Antimicrobials Surveillance Programme (2015-2019) were matched to their historical records in the national GUMCAD STI surveillance data set (2012-2019). The number of gonorrhoea diagnoses in the previous 3 years was calculated for each SHS attendee. Logistic regression was used to examine the associations between the number of diagnoses and reduced susceptibility to ceftriaxone (minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) >0.03 mg/L), cefixime (MIC >0.06 mg/L) and azithromycin (MIC >0.25 mg/L) at the time of the latest diagnosis. RESULTS: Of 6161 individuals included in the analysis, 3913 (63.5%) were MSM, 1220 (19.8%) were heterosexual men and 814 (13.2%) were women. Among MSM, 2476 (63.3%) had 1 past gonorrhoea diagnosis, 1295 (33.1%) had 2-4, 140 (3.6%) 5-9, and 2 (0.1%) ≥10. Most women and heterosexual men (91.7%) had one past gonorrhoea diagnosis; none had more than four. Reduced ceftriaxone and cefixime susceptibility was more common among MSM with two to four gonorrhoea diagnoses (3.8% and 5.8%, respectively) compared with those with one (2.2% and 3.9%, respectively). After adjusting for potential confounding, this association remained (adjusted OR: 1.59, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.37, p=0.02; adjusted OR: 1.54, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.14, p=0.01). No evidence was found for any other associations. CONCLUSIONS: Among MSM, repeat diagnosis of gonorrhoea may be associated with reduced ceftriaxone and cefixime susceptibility. As these are last-line therapies for gonorrhoea, further research is needed to assess the impact of intensive STI screening on AMR.

Characterizing the Rise of Disseminated Gonococcal Infections in California, July 2020-July 2021.

BACKGROUND: California has experienced an increase in reported cases of disseminated gonococcal infection (DGI). Given significant morbidity associated with DGI and the ability of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to rapidly develop antibiotic resistance, characterization of these cases can inform diagnosis, management, and prevention of DGI. METHODS: As part of the public health response to increased reports of DGI, we used gonorrhea surveillance data reported to the California Department of Public Health to identify all DGI cases in a geographically-bound region. Standardized case report forms were used to collect epidemiologic risk factors and clinical information obtained from provider/laboratory reports, medical records, and patient interviews. RESULTS: From 1 July 2020 to 31 July 2021, we identified 149 DGI patients among 63 338 total gonorrhea infections, representing 0.24% of gonorrhea cases. Estimated incidence was 0.47 DGI cases per 100 000 person-years. Mean age of DGI patients was 40 years, and 75 (50%) were cisgender men, of whom only 13 were known to have male partners. Where reported, more than one-third (36%) used methamphetamine and nearly one-quarter (23%) experienced homelessness. Clinically, 61% lacked urogenital, pharyngeal, or rectal symptoms; 2 patients died in the hospital. Among 47 isolates from patients with antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results available, all were susceptible to ceftriaxone and cefixime. CONCLUSIONS: Most DGI patients lacked urogenital symptoms and were not among populations for which routine gonorrhea screening is currently recommended. Expanding gonorrhea screening might prevent DGI. Cefixime is likely the best option if transitioning from parenteral to oral therapy when AST results are unavailable.

Antibiotic resistance of uropathogens among the community-dwelling pregnant and nonpregnant female: a step towards antibiotic stewardship.

BACKGROUND: Indiscriminate and widespread use of antibiotics has resulted in emergence of many antibiotic-resistant organisms. Antibiotic administration during pregnancy is mostly avoided, unless there is compelling medical condition. We hypothesized that the uropathogens isolated from pregnant women would be more susceptible to antibiotics compared to those isolated from nonpregnant women, thus will be helpful in formulating separate empiric guideline for pregnant women based on the resistance pattern. METHODS: This was a prospective cross-sectional study conducted over a period of 2 years in which females with the clinical diagnosis of either cystitis or asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy were included from the community settings. Uropathogen species and their antimicrobial resistance pattern were compared between the pregnant and nonpregnant groups. After accounting for centre-to-centre variation and adjusting for age and socio-economic status, the adjusted odds ratio for antibiotic resistance was calculated and compared between pregnant and nonpregnant women using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1758 women (pregnant: 43.3%; nonpregnant: 56.6%) were screened in the study over a period of 2 years, out of which 9.3% (163/1758) were having significant bacteriuria. Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the two commonest uropathogen in both the groups; their prevalence being 83.6% in pregnant women and 85.2% in nonpregnant women, respectively. Resistance against ampicillin, cefixime, cefoxitin, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid were found significantly lower in the pregnant women compared to nonpregnant. After adjusting the age and socio-economic status accounting for centre-to-centre variation, the odds of resistance for cefixime, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and co-trimoxazole were found lower and statistically significant among the pregnant women group. CONCLUSIONS: The antimicrobial resistance was significantly higher among the community-dwelling nonpregnant women compared to pregnant women in case of few antibiotics. The study highlighted the need of building local antibiogram that could help to initiate the empirical treatment and thus prevent emergence of antimicrobial resistance.

Examining the Combination of Cefixime and Amoxicillin/Clavulanate against Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli Isolates.

INTRODUCTION: Community-acquired urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli have limited oral therapeutic options and pose significant clinical challenges. The goal of this study was to evaluate the in vitro synergy between CFM and AMC against ESBL E. coli with aims to identify an oral treatment option for UTIs. METHODS: Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of CFM in the presence of AMC were determined for 46 clinical isolates by placing a CFM Etest on a plate with AMC impregnated in the agar. Isolates with CFM MIC ≤1 µg/mL in the presence of AMC were considered susceptible to the CFM and AMC combination. Five isolates were then selected for further testing using time-kill analysis in the presence of CFM, AMC, and CFM with AMC. Time-kill curves were plotted to determine synergy over 24 h. RESULTS: AMC improved the activity of CFM against ESBL E. coli isolates by 128-fold in the Etest analysis with 85% of tested isolates being susceptible to the combination. A fourfold or greater reduction in CFM MIC was exhibited in 44 of 46 (96%) isolates when in the presence of AMC. Synergy and bactericidal activity between CFM and AMC were exhibited in each of the five isolates tested by time-kill analysis. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: This study found that AMC improves the activity of CFM against ESBL E. coli and that this antibiotic combination has potential as an oral therapeutic option to treat ESBL E. coli UTIs.

Treatment of enteric fever (typhoid and paratyphoid fever) with cephalosporins.

BACKGROUND: Typhoid and paratyphoid (enteric fever) are febrile bacterial illnesses common in many low- and middle-income countries. The World Health Organization (WHO) currently recommends treatment with azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, or ceftriaxone due to widespread resistance to older, first-line antimicrobials. Resistance patterns vary in different locations and are changing over time. Fluoroquinolone resistance in South Asia often precludes the use of ciprofloxacin. Extensively drug-resistant strains of enteric fever have emerged in Pakistan. In some areas of the world, susceptibility to old first-line antimicrobials, such as chloramphenicol, has re-appeared. A Cochrane Review of the use of fluoroquinolones and azithromycin in the treatment of enteric fever has previously been undertaken, but the use of cephalosporins has not been systematically investigated and the optimal choice of drug and duration of treatment are uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of cephalosporins for treating enteric fever in children and adults compared to other antimicrobials. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, the WHO ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov up to 24 November 2021. We also searched reference lists of included trials, contacted researchers working in the field, and contacted relevant organizations. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults and children with enteric fever that compared a cephalosporin to another antimicrobial, a different cephalosporin, or a different treatment duration of the intervention cephalosporin. Enteric fever was diagnosed on the basis of blood culture, bone marrow culture, or molecular tests. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were clinical failure, microbiological failure and relapse. Our secondary outcomes were time to defervescence, duration of hospital admission, convalescent faecal carriage, and adverse effects. We used the GRADE approach to assess certainty of evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS: We included 27 RCTs with 2231 total participants published between 1986 and 2016 across Africa, Asia, Europe, the Middle East and the Caribbean, with comparisons between cephalosporins and other antimicrobials used for the treatment of enteric fever in children and adults. The main comparisons are between antimicrobials in most common clinical use, namely cephalosporins compared to a fluoroquinolone and cephalosporins compared to azithromycin. Cephalosporin (cefixime) versus fluoroquinolones Clinical failure, microbiological failure and relapse may be increased in patients treated with cefixime compared to fluoroquinolones in three small trials published over 14 years ago: clinical failure (risk ratio (RR) 13.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.24 to 55.39; 2 trials, 240 participants; low-certainty evidence); microbiological failure (RR 4.07, 95% CI 0.46 to 36.41; 2 trials, 240 participants; low-certainty evidence); relapse (RR 4.45, 95% CI 1.11 to 17.84; 2 trials, 220 participants; low-certainty evidence). Time to defervescence in participants treated with cefixime may be longer compared to participants treated with fluoroquinolones (mean difference (MD) 1.74 days, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.98, 3 trials, 425 participants; low-certainty evidence). Cephalosporin (ceftriaxone) versus azithromycin Ceftriaxone may result in a decrease in clinical failure compared to azithromycin, and it is unclear whether ceftriaxone has an effect on microbiological failure compared to azithromycin in two small trials published over 18 years ago and in one more recent trial, all conducted in participants under 18 years of age: clinical failure (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.57; 3 trials, 196 participants; low-certainty evidence); microbiological failure (RR 1.95, 95% CI 0.36 to 10.64, 3 trials, 196 participants; very low-certainty evidence). It is unclear whether ceftriaxone increases or decreases relapse compared to azithromycin (RR 10.05, 95% CI 1.93 to 52.38; 3 trials, 185 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Time to defervescence in participants treated with ceftriaxone may be shorter compared to participants treated with azithromycin (mean difference of -0.52 days, 95% CI -0.91 to -0.12; 3 trials, 196 participants; low-certainty evidence). Cephalosporin (ceftriaxone) versus fluoroquinolones It is unclear whether ceftriaxone has an effect on clinical failure, microbiological failure, relapse, and time to defervescence compared to fluoroquinolones in three trials published over 28 years ago and two more recent trials: clinical failure (RR 3.77, 95% CI 0.72 to 19.81; 4 trials, 359 participants; very low-certainty evidence); microbiological failure (RR 1.65, 95% CI 0.40 to 6.83; 3 trials, 316 participants; very low-certainty evidence); relapse (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.31 to 2.92; 3 trials, 297 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and time to defervescence (MD 2.73 days, 95% CI -0.37 to 5.84; 3 trials, 285 participants; very low-certainty evidence). It is unclear whether ceftriaxone decreases convalescent faecal carriage compared to the fluoroquinolone gatifloxacin (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.01 to 3.72; 1 trial, 73 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and length of hospital stay may be longer in participants treated with ceftriaxone compared to participants treated with the fluoroquinolone ofloxacin (mean of 12 days (range 7 to 23 days) in the ceftriaxone group compared to a mean of 9 days (range 6 to 13 days) in the ofloxacin group; 1 trial, 47 participants; low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on very low- to low-certainty evidence, ceftriaxone is an effective treatment for adults and children with enteric fever, with few adverse effects. Trials suggest that there may be no difference in the performance of ceftriaxone compared with azithromycin, fluoroquinolones, or chloramphenicol. Cefixime can also be used for treatment of enteric fever but may not perform as well as fluoroquinolones.  We are unable to draw firm general conclusions on comparative contemporary effectiveness given that most trials were small and conducted over 20 years previously. Clinicians need to take into account current, local resistance patterns in addition to route of administration when choosing an antimicrobial.

Optimisation of treatments for oral Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection: Pharmacokinetics Study (STI-PK project) - study protocol for non-randomised clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections are common and incidence increasing. Oropharyngeal infections are associated with greater treatment failure compared with other sites and drive transmission to anogenital sites through saliva. Gonococcal resistance is increasing and new treatments are scarce, therefore, clinicians must optimise currently available and emerging treatments in order to have efficacious therapeutic options. This requires pharmacokinetic data from the oral cavity/oropharynx, however, availability of such information is currently limited. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Healthy male volunteers (participants) recruited into the study will receive single doses of either ceftriaxone 1 g, cefixime 400 mg or ceftriaxone 500 mg plus 2 g azithromycin. Participants will provide samples at 6-8 time points (treatment regimen dependent) from four oral sites, two oral fluids, one anorectal swab and blood. Participants will complete online questionnaires about their medical history, sexual practices and any side effects experienced up to days 5-7. Saliva/oral mucosal pH and oral microbiome analysis will be undertaken. Bioanalysis will be conducted by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Drug concentrations over time will be used to develop mathematical models for optimisation of drug dosing regimens and to estimate pharmacodynamic targets of efficacy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by Royal Melbourne Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (60370/MH-2021). The study results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and reported at conferences. Summary results will be sent to participants requesting them. All data relevant to the study will be included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12621000339853.

Right hip gonococcal septic arthritis treatment with successful transition to oral fluoroquinolone.

We present a case of gonococcal septic arthritis of the right hip diagnosed via synovial fluid cultures. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the synovial fluid demonstrated susceptibility to tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, cefixime and ceftriaxone. Our patient was initially treated with ceftriaxone and was successfully de-escalated to oral levofloxacin to complete the treatment. This case is interesting given the rarity of disseminated gonococcal infections in the 21st century and that most clinical isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae are increasingly resistant to fluoroquinolones.

In vitro selection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae unveils novel mutations associated with extended-spectrum cephalosporin resistance.

The emergence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins (ESCs) is a worldwide concern because this class of antibiotics represents the last empirical treatment option for gonorrhea. The abusive use of antimicrobials may be an essential factor for the emergence of ESC resistance in N. gonorrhoeae. Cephalosporin resistance mechanisms have not been fully clarified. In this study, we mapped mutations in the genome of N. gonorrhoeae isolates after resistance induction with cefixime and explored related metabolic pathways. Six clinical isolates with different antimicrobial susceptibility profiles and genotypes and two gonococcal reference strains (WHO F and WHO Y) were induced with increasing concentrations of cefixime. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed against six antimicrobial agents before and after induction. Clinical isolates were whole-genome sequenced before and after induction, whereas reference strains were sequenced after induction only. Cefixime resistance induction was completed after 138 subcultures. Several metabolic pathways were affected by resistance induction. Five isolates showed SNPs in PBP2. The isolates M111 and M128 (ST1407 with mosaic penA-34.001) acquired one and four novel missense mutations in PBP2, respectively. These isolates exhibited the highest minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for cefixime among all clinical isolates. Mutations in genes contributing to ESC resistance and in other genes were also observed. Interestingly, M107 and M110 (ST338) showed no mutations in key determinants of ESC resistance despite having a 127-fold increase in the MIC of cefixime. These findings point to the existence of different mechanisms of acquisition of ESC resistance induced by cefixime exposure. Furthermore, the results reinforce the importance of the gonococcal antimicrobial resistance surveillance program in Brazil, given the changes in treatment protocols made in 2017 and the nationwide prevalence of sequence types that can develop resistance to ESC.

Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assay for Identifying Neisseria gonorrhoeae Nonmosaic penA-Targeting Strains Potentially Eradicable by Cefixime.

Treatment regimens for gonorrhea have limited efficacy worldwide due to the rapid spread of antimicrobial resistance. Cefixime (CFM) is currently not recommended as a first-line treatment for gonorrhea due to the increasing number of resistant strains worldwide. Nonetheless, Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains can be eradicated by CFM at a 400 mg/day dose, provided that the strains are CFM responsive (MIC ≤ 0.064 mg/L). To develop a nonculture test for predicting the CFM responsiveness of N. gonorrhoeae strains, we developed an assay to detect N. gonorrhoeae nonmosaic penA using loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP). To avoid false-positive reactions with commensal Neisseria spp. penA, we amplified specific regions of the N. gonorrhoeae penA (NG-penA-LAMP1) and also the nonmosaic N. gonorrhoeae penA (NG-penA-LAMP3). This assay was validated using isolated N. gonorrhoeae (n = 204) and Neisseria spp. (n = 95) strains. Clinical specimens (n = 95) with confirmed positivity in both culture and real-time PCR were evaluated to validate the system. The combination of the previously described NG-penA-LAMP1 and our new NG-penA-LAMP3 assays had high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (100%) for identifying N. gonorrhoeae carrying the nonmosaic type. To determine whether CFM could be applicable for gonorrhea treatment without culture testing, we developed a LAMP assay that targets penA allele-specific nonmosaic types for use as one of the tools for point-of-care testing of antimicrobial resistance. IMPORTANCE Neisseria gonorrhoeae is among the hot topics of "resistance guided therapy," one of the top 5 urgent antimicrobial threats according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). There is a need either to develop new agents or to make effective use of existing agents, with the current limited number of therapeutic agents available. Knowing the drug susceptibility information of the target microorganism prior to treating patients is very useful in selecting an effective antibiotic, especially in gonococcal infections where drug resistance is prominent, and is also important in preventing treatment failure. In this study, we developed a new method for obtaining drug susceptibility profiles of Neisseria gonorrhoeae using the loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method. The LAMP assay does not require expensive devices. Therefore, this method is expected to be a tool for point-of-care testing of antimicrobial resistance for individualized treatment in the future.

Whole-genome sequence analysis of high-level penicillin-resistant strains and antimicrobial susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae clinical isolates from Thailand.

BACKGROUND: The increasing rate of antimicrobial-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae poses a considerable public health threat due to the difficulty in treating gonococcal infections. This study examined antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to drugs recommended for gonorrhea treatment between 2015 and 2017, and the AMR determinants and genetic compositions of plasmids in 3 gonococcal strains with high-level penicillin resistance. METHODS: We collected 117 N. gonorrhoeae isolates from patients with gonococcal infections who attended Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, between 2015 and 2017. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of penicillin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, spectinomycin, cefixime, and ceftriaxone were determined by the agar dilution method. PCR amplification and sequencing of 23S rRNA and mtrR (a negative regulator of MtrCDE efflux pump) were performed. Whole genomes of 3 PPNG strains with high-level penicillin resistance (MIC ≥ 128 µg/ml) were sequenced using Illumina and Nanopore sequencing platforms. RESULTS: The proportions of N. gonorrhoeae isolates with resistance were 84.6% for penicillin, 91.5% for tetracycline, and 96.6% for ciprofloxacin. All isolates were susceptible to spectinomycin, azithromycin, cefixime, and ceftriaxone. An adenine deletion within a 13 bp inverted repeat sequence in the mtrR promoter and an H105Y mutation in the mtrR coding region were found in the N. gonorrhoeae isolate with the highest azithromycin MIC value (1 µg/ml). Three high-level penicillin-resistant isolates contained nonmosaic type II penA and had mutations in penB and the mtrR coding region. All isolates with high-level penicillin resistance carried the conjugative plasmids with or without the Dutch type tetM determinant, the beta-lactamase plasmid (Rio/Toronto), and the cryptic plasmid. CONCLUSIONS: The gonococcal population in Thailand showed high susceptibility to ceftriaxone and azithromycin, current dual therapy recommended for gonorrhea treatment. As elevated MIC of azithromycin has been observed in 1 strain of N. gonorrhoeae, expanded and enhanced surveillance of antimicrobial susceptibility and study of genetic resistance determinants are essential to improve treatment guidelines.

Randomized controlled trial of the relative efficacy of high-dose intravenous ceftriaxone and oral cefixime combined with doxycycline for the treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae co-infection.

OBJECTIVES: Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) are the commonest bacterial causes of sexually transmitted infections in humans with high incidence of co-infection. Treatment with high doses of ceftriaxone (CRO) and cefixime (CFM) is strongly recommended due to the reduced drug susceptibility of NG. However, their safety and efficacy have not been confirmed. We compared the safety and efficacy of a single 1 g intravenous (IV) dose of ceftriaxone (CRO) plus doxycycline (DOX) versus a single 800 mg oral dose of cefixime (CFM) plus DOX for the treatment of NG-CT co-infection. METHODS: An open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted on 125 individuals aged > 18 years with untreated gonorrhea and chlamydia to compare a single 1 g intravenous dose of CRO + DOX and a single 800 mg oral dose of CFM + DOX. The primary outcome was the clearance of NG from all the initially infected sites. Secondary outcomes included symptom resolution, changes in the serum clearance levels, glomerular filtration rate, and antibiotic minimum inhibitory concentrations. RESULTS: Both regimens were highly effective in treating gonorrhea with success rates of 96.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.8-99.1%) for CRO and 95.3% (95% CI 87.1-98.4%) for CFM. However, CRO + DOX was superior to CFM + DOX for the treatment of NG-CT co-infection (odds ratio 4.41, 95% CI 1.11-25.7). The safety profiles of the two regimens were similar. CONCLUSIONS: CRO + DOX was superior to CFM + DOX for the treatment of NG-CT co-infection. CFM + DOX may be indicated in patients with CRO allergy and in settings where CRO is unavailable. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05216744) on 31/01/22.

Resistance-Guided Therapy for Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Antimicrobial-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections are a threat to public health. Novel strategies for combating such resistance include the development of molecular assays to facilitate real-time prediction of antimicrobial susceptibility. Resistance to ciprofloxacin is determined by the presence of a single mutation at codon 91 of the gyrase A gene; molecular assays to guide therapy are commercially available. Resistance to cefixime is conferred via 1 of 6 critical mutations in either the mosaic penA gene or specific loci in the nonmosaic region. Resistance to ceftriaxone is conferred through mutations in 1 of 4 genes: penA, ponA, penB, and mtr; however, the ability to predict reduced susceptibility based on those genes varies by geographic region. Here, we highlight the work done toward the development of 3 such assays for ciprofloxacin, cefixime, and ceftriaxone, discuss the status of our current understanding and ongoing challenges, and suggest future directions.