The impact of daily use of an enteral feeding checklist on clinical outcomes in shock patients: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The optimal delivery of enteral nutrition in shock patients has an important prognostic clinical value; thus, checklists for standardizing enteral nutrition should be developed. This study examined whether the use of an enteral feeding checklist can improve enteral nutrition in shock patients. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. A multidisciplinary working group developed an enteral feeding checklist. Information on patients' demographics, checklist items, and clinical outcomes was collected. RESULTS: In total, 148 patients were included. The checklist was used for 35 patients but not for the remaining 113 patients. Patients in the checklist group received enteral nutrition earlier (2.6 vs 4.6 days, p=0.017) and had a lower mechanical ventilation rate (62.9% vs 85.0%, p=0.004). The checklist group had shorter intensive care unit stay (mean 17.3 vs 25.7 days, p=0.043). No significant differences were observed in 28- and 90- day mortality, mechanical ventilation duration, and intolerance to enteral nutrition. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an enteral feeding checklist in shock patients was associated with earlier enteral nutrition delivery and decreased intensive care unit stay.

Impact of nutrition route on microaspiration in critically ill patients with shock: a planned ancillary study of the NUTRIREA-2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Microaspiration of gastric and oropharyngeal secretions is the main mechanism of entry of bacteria into the lower respiratory tract in intubated critically ill patients. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of enteral nutrition, as compared with parenteral nutrition, on abundant microaspiration of gastric contents and oropharyngeal secretions. METHODS: Planned ancillary study of the randomized controlled multicenter NUTRIREA2 trial. Patients with shock receiving invasive mechanical ventilation were randomized to receive early enteral or parenteral nutrition. All tracheal aspirates were collected during the 48 h following randomization. Abundant microaspiration of gastric contents and oropharyngeal secretions was defined as the presence of significant levels of pepsin (> 200 ng/ml) and salivary amylase (> 1685 UI/ml) in > 30% of tracheal aspirates. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients were included (78 and 73 patients in enteral and parenteral nutrition groups, respectively), and 1074 tracheal aspirates were quantitatively analyzed for pepsin and amylase. Although vomiting rate was significantly higher (31% vs 15%, p = 0.016), constipation rate was significantly lower (6% vs 21%, p = 0.010) in patients with enteral than in patients with parenteral nutrition. No significant difference was found regarding other patient characteristics. The percentage of patients with abundant microaspiration of gastric contents was significantly lower in enteral than in parenteral nutrition groups (14% vs 36%, p = 0.004; unadjusted OR 0.80 (95% CI 0.69, 0.93), adjusted OR 0.79 (0.76, 0.94)). The percentage of patients with abundant microaspiration of oropharyngeal secretions was significantly higher in enteral than in parenteral nutrition groups (74% vs 54%, p = 0.026; unadjusted OR 1.21 (95% CI 1.03, 1.44), adjusted OR 1.23 (1.01, 1.48)). No significant difference was found in percentage of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia between enteral (8%) and parenteral (10%) nutrition groups (HR 0.78 (0.26, 2.28)). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that enteral and parenteral nutrition are associated with high rates of microaspiration, although oropharyngeal microaspiration was more common with enteral nutrition and gastric microaspiration was more common with parenteral nutrition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03411447 . Registered 18 July 2017. Retrospectively registered.

Effects of early enteral arginine supplementation on resuscitation of severe burn patients.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of dietary supplementation of l-arginine (l-Arg) on shock in severely burned patients. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, single blind, controlled study. Forty-seven severely burned patients due to various causes with a total burn surface area (TBSA) more than 50% each admitted in early postburn phase (within 10h postburn) were included in this study. All patients were treated by the traditional resuscitation program of our institute. After the nasogastric feeding tube was placed, they were randomly divided into three groups-(1) group A400 (n = 16): giving gastrointestinal feeding with 500 ml 5% GNS, containing l-Arg (400 mg/ kgday) at equal pace with fluid resuscitation; (2) group A200 (n = 16): giving gastrointestinal feeding with 500 ml 5% GNS containing l-Arg (200 mg/ kgday); (3) group C (n = 15): giving gastrointestinal feeding with 500 ml 5% GNS without any supplementation. The feeding started within 12h after burn and lasted for 72 h, the feeding rate was controlled by an enteral feeding pump. The following parameters were observed on days (PBD) 1-4: serum nitric oxide content (NO), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), oxygenation index (PO2/FiO2), and arterial blood content of lactic acid (LA). Gastric mucosal blood flow was measured by laser Doppler flow-metry on PBD1 and PBD2. RESULTS: (1) Enteral feeding of l-Arg did not change MAP of severely burned patients, with no difference in MAP between the l-Arg supplemented and control groups. (2) There were significant changes of the l-Arg supplemented groups (A400 and A200), with an increased gastric mucosa blood flow, oxygenation index, and a decreased LA content in arterial blood, compared with the control group. (3) The serous NO content was significantly decreased in the A400 group on PBD2-4 (P < 0.01), and in the A200 group on PBD4 (P < 0.05) compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Enteral feeding with l-arginine supplementation on early stage of burn decreases NO production to a relatively normal level and exerts beneficial effects on the resuscitation of burned shock.