Autofluorescence-Guided Total Thyroidectomy in Low-Volume, Nonparathyroid Institutions.

Importance: Hypoparathyroidism following thyroid surgery is a serious complication that occurs frequently when surgery is performed by low-volume thyroid surgeons without experience in parathyroid surgery. Objective: To evaluate the occurrence of hypoparathyroidism following total thyroidectomy after the introduction of autofluorescence in low-volume, nonparathyroid institutions. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, multicenter cohort study, with a follow-up period of up to 1 year, was conducted in Denmark at 2 low-volume nonparathyroid institutions between January 2021 and November 2023. All adult patients referred for total thyroidectomy were assessed for eligibility (n = 90). Only patients with no history of thyroid surgery were considered (n = 89). Patients who only underwent lobectomy (n = 6) or declined to participate (n = 5) were excluded. All included patients completed follow-up. The prospective cohort was compared with a historical cohort of successive patients undergoing primary total thyroidectomy from 2016 to 2020 (before autofluorescence was available). Intervention: Included patients underwent autofluorescence-guided total thyroidectomy. Main outcomes and Measures: Rate of hypoparathyroidism. Immediate hypoparathyroidism was defined as the need for active vitamin D postoperatively, whereas permanent hypoparathyroidism was considered when there still was a need for active vitamin D 1 year after surgery. Results: Seventy-eight patients underwent autofluorescence-guided surgery (mean [SD] age, 55.6 [13.1] years; 67 [86%] female) and were compared with 89 patients in the historical cohort (mean [SD] age, 49.7 [12.8] years; 78 [88%] female). The rate of immediate hypoparathyroidism decreased from 37% (95% CI, 27%-48%) to 19% (95% CI, 11%-30%) after the introduction of autofluorescence (P = .02). Permanent hypoparathyroidism rates decreased from 32% (95% CI, 22%-42%) to 6% (95% CI, 2%-14%) (P < .001), reaching 0% at the end of the study. More parathyroid glands were identified with autofluorescence (75% [95% CI, 70%-80%] vs 61% [95% CI, 56%-66%]) (P < .001) and less parathyroid glands were inadvertently excised (4% [95% CI, 1%-11%] vs 21% [95% CI, 13%-31%]) (P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of autofluorescence-guided thyroid surgery in low-volume, nonparathyroid institutions, the use of autofluorescence was associated with a significant decrease in both immediate and permanent hypoparathyroidism. When autofluorescence was used, hypoparathyroidism rates were comparable with those of high-volume surgeons who also perform parathyroid surgery.

The Use of Advanced Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography During Simple and Complex Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repairs.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) success depends on imaging technology both in the planning and operative phases. Endovascular repair requires intravenous contrast and radiation exposure to the patient as well as radiation exposure to the operator. Recent developments in imaging technology attempt to merge preoperative imaging with intraoperative imaging to improve the efficiency and accuracy of EVAR. The Cydar 3-dimensional (3D) imaging system combines the preoperative and intraoperative imaging during the operation. We aim to investigate the use of the Cydar 3D imaging system during EVAR compared to conventional methods. METHODS: Retrospective review of all patients undergoing an EVAR at a single quaternary vascular center from 2019-2023 was collected. This cohort was divided into 2 groups: (1) repair using Cydar 3D imaging or (2) repair without Cydar 3D imaging. Overall, 138 unique patients were identified with 27 operations using Cydar 3D imaging and 111 operations without Cydar 3D imaging. We performed a 1-to-1 propensity score-matched analysis using nearest-neighbor matching for variables including age, case urgency, and if the case was performed in the operative room or interventional radiology room. A match occurred when a patient in the Cydar 3D imaging group had an estimated score within 0.01 standard deviations of a patient in the control group. From this, we paired 27 from each cohort for a total of 54 patients. Demographic data included length of stay in days, contrast volume (mL), fluoroscopy time (min), procedure length (mins), mortality, and blood loss (mL). Univariate analyses were performed and a P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 54 vascular patients were analyzed: 27 without the Cydar 3D imaging and 27 with the Cydar 3D imaging. In the univariate analysis, there was no statistical difference in the average length of stay (6.4 days ± 11.76 vs. 4.1 ± 6.03, P = 0.372), aneurysm size (5.9 ± 1.4 vs. 5.9 ± 1.2, P = 0.88), contrast volume in mL (91.3 ± 47.0 vs. 91.1-33.49, P = 9.88), fluoroscopy time in mins (20.2 ± 17.2 vs. 19.5 ± 19.4, P = 0.89), procedure length (299.3 ± 177.9 vs. 353 ± 191.98, P = 0.279), and blood loss in mL (513.8 ± 791 vs. 353 ± 191.98, P = 0.594). There was an increase in reintervention for endoleaks in the group with use of Cydar 3D imaging (0 vs. 6, P = 0.043). A subanalysis of patients undergoing physician-modified EVARs did show a 15% reduction in the contrast volume used. CONCLUSIONS: The use of 3D imaging technology has the potential to increase the safety of EVAR to both patients and operators. In our study, we did not find any difference in standard EVARs; however, there was a contrast use decrease in physician-modified EVARs. Further studies will need to be performed to determine the realized benefit from performing EVARs using this new technology.

Pedicle screw placement accuracy in robot-assisted versus image-guided freehand surgery of thoraco-lumbar spine (ROBARTHRODESE): study protocol for a single-centre randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Robotic spinal surgery may result in better pedicle screw placement accuracy, and reduction in radiation exposure and length of stay, compared to freehand surgery. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to compare screw placement accuracy of robot-assisted surgery with integrated 3D computer-assisted navigation versus freehand surgery with 2D fluoroscopy for arthrodesis of the thoraco-lumbar spine. METHODS: This is a single-centre evaluator-blinded RCT with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Participants (n = 300) will be randomized into two groups, robot-assisted (Mazor X Stealth Edition) versus freehand, after stratification based on the planned number of pedicle screws needed for surgery. The primary outcome is the proportion of pedicle screws placed with grade A accuracy (Gertzbein-Robbins classification) on postoperative computed tomography images. The secondary outcomes are intervention time, operation room occupancy time, length of stay, estimated blood loss, surgeon's radiation exposure, screw fracture/loosening, superior-level facet joint violation, complication rate, reoperation rate on the same level or one level above, functional and clinical outcomes (Oswestry Disability Index, pain, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, sensory and motor status) and cost-utility analysis. DISCUSSION: This RCT will provide insight into whether robot-assisted surgery with the newest generation spinal robot yields better pedicle screw placement accuracy than freehand surgery. Potential benefits of robot-assisted surgery include lower complication and revision rates, shorter length of stay, lower radiation exposure and reduction of economic cost of the overall care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05553028. Registered on September 23, 2022.

Intraoperative navigation increases the projected lifetime cancer risk in patients undergoing surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a common condition, often requiring surgical correction. Computed tomography (CT) based navigation technologies, which rely on ionizing radiation, are increasingly being utilized for surgical treatment. Although this population is highly vulnerable to radiation, given their age and female predominance, there is little available information elucidating modeled iatrogenic cancer risk. PURPOSE: To model lifetime cancer risk associated with the use of intraoperative CT-based navigation for surgical treatment of AIS. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This retrospective cross-sectional study took place in a quaternary care academic pediatric hospital in the United States. PATIENT SAMPLE: Adolescents aged 10-18 who underwent posterior spinal fusion for a diagnosis of AIS between July 2014 and December 2019. OUTCOMES MEASURES: Effective radiation dose and projected lifetime cancer risk associated with intraoperative doses of ionizing radiation. METHODS: Clinical and radiographic parameters were abstracted, including total radiation dose during surgery from flat plate radiographs, fluoroscopy, and intraoperative CT scans. Multivariable regression analysis was used to assess differences in radiation exposure between patients treated with conventional radiography versus intraoperative navigation. Radiation exposure was translated into lifetime cancer risk using well-established algorithms. RESULTS: In total, 245 patients were included, 119 of whom were treated with navigation. The cohort was 82.9% female and 14.4 years of age. The median radiation exposure (in millisieverts, mSv) for fluoroscopy, radiography, and navigation was 0.05, 4.14, and 8.19 mSv, respectively. When accounting for clinical and radiographic differences, patients treated with intraoperative navigation received 8.18 mSv more radiation (95%CI: 7.22-9.15, p<.001). This increase in radiation projects to 0.90 iatrogenic malignancies per 1,000 patients (95%CI 0.79-1.01). CONCLUSIONS: Ours is the first work to define cancer risk in the setting of radiation exposure for navigated AIS surgery. We project that intraoperative navigation will generate approximately one iatrogenic malignancy for every 1,000 patients treated. Given that spine surgery for AIS is common and occurs in the context of a multitude of other radiation sources, these data highlight the need for radiation budgeting protocols and continued development of lower radiation dose technologies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.