Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Reprod Sci ; 28(12): 3466-3472, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33939166

RESUMO

"Add-on" procedures are actively promoted on some fertility clinic websites as proven means to improve IVF success rates, especially for couples with repeated implantation/IVF failures. However, the actual contribution of these interventions to live birth rates remains inconclusive. At present, little is known about the type and quality of the information provided on the IVF clinics' websites regarding the merits of "add-ons." A systematic evaluation of the quality of information on "add-on" procedures in fertility clinic websites was performed using 10-criteria structured questionnaire. We included English language websites that presented in the Google.com search engine after typing the following key-words:"endometrial scratching"(ES), "intralipid infusions"(ILI), "assisted hatching"(AHA), "PGT-A," or "PGS". In total, 254 websites were evaluated. In most cases, an accurate description of the "add-on" procedures was provided (78.8%). However, only a minority (12%) reported their undetermined effectiveness. The use of PGT-A was more often encouraged (52.8%) than ES (23.6%) and AHA (16%). The cost was infrequently presented (6.9%). Scientific references were only rarely provided for ILI, versus 12.7% for ES, 4.0% for AHA, and 5.6% for PGT-A. The information entry date was often missing. None of the websites reported the clinic's pregnancy-rate following the "add-on" procedures. Information on "add-ons" available to patients from IVF clinic websites is often inaccurate. This could perpetuate false myths among infertile patients about these procedures and raises concern regarding possible commercial bias. It is imperative that IVF clinic websites will better communicate the associated risks and uncertainties of "add-ons" to prospective patients.


Assuntos
Clínicas de Fertilização/normas , Gastos em Saúde/normas , Infertilidade/terapia , Internet/normas , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/normas , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/normas , Coeficiente de Natalidade , Feminino , Clínicas de Fertilização/economia , Humanos , Infertilidade/economia , Disseminação de Informação/métodos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Gravidez , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/economia
2.
Fertil Steril ; 115(1): 104-109, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33069369

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) member in vitro fertilization (IVF) centers adhere to the Society's new advertising policy, updated in January 2018, and evaluate other services advertised by region, insurance mandate and university affiliation status. Historically, a large percentage of IVF clinics have not adhered to SART guidelines for IVF clinic website advertising and have had variability in how financial incentives and other noncore fertility services are advertised. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): None. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Adherence of SART participating websites to objective criteria from the 2018 SART advertising guidelines. RESULT(S): All 361 SART participating clinic websites were evaluated. Approximately one third of clinics reported success rate statistics directly on their websites, but only 52.6% of those clinics reported current statistics. Similarly, only 67.5% of SART member clinics included the required disclaimer statement regarding their outcome statistics. Only 10.5% of websites were wholly compliant with SART guidelines regarding presentation of supplemental data. There were no significant differences between academic and nonacademic centers, programs in mandated versus nonmandated states, or East versus West Coast clinics in any of these areas. CONCLUSION(S): Many of the SART member websites failed to adhere to core guidelines surrounding reporting IVF clinic success rates. Consideration for additional education and streamlining as well as simplifying success rate advertising guidelines is recommended.


Assuntos
Publicidade/normas , Clínicas de Fertilização , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/organização & administração , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/normas , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Clínicas de Fertilização/economia , Clínicas de Fertilização/organização & administração , Clínicas de Fertilização/normas , Clínicas de Fertilização/estatística & dados numéricos , Fertilização in vitro/economia , Fertilização in vitro/normas , Fertilização in vitro/estatística & dados numéricos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/tendências , Humanos , Internet/economia , Internet/normas , Internet/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Taxa de Gravidez , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/economia , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/normas , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/estatística & dados numéricos , Sociedades Médicas/organização & administração , Sociedades Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
3.
Fertil Steril ; 115(2): 290-295, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33358019

RESUMO

To succeed in the assisted reproductive technology industry, physician owners of fertility practices have to develop a wide array of business skills and expertise. In today's business world, a natural next step for many assisted reproductive practices is exploring potential mergers, sales, or acquisitions. This article will explore what factors physician owners of fertility practices should consider before pursuing a potential sale or merger; how to prepare for such a transaction; and what to expect once a transaction is underway.


Assuntos
Comércio/legislação & jurisprudência , Clínicas de Fertilização/legislação & jurisprudência , Instituições Associadas de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/legislação & jurisprudência , Comércio/economia , Clínicas de Fertilização/economia , Instituições Associadas de Saúde/economia , Humanos , Médicos/economia , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/economia
4.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 41(5): 801-806, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32888824

RESUMO

RESEARCH QUESTION: How are IVF clinic websites advertising three common IVF add-ons: assisted hatching, time-lapse embryo imaging and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A)? DESIGN: The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority 'Choose a fertility clinic' website service was used to identify IVF clinics and their websites. Assisted hatching, time-lapse embryo imaging and PGT-A were examined to determine which websites advertised them, what price they charged and what claims they made in relation to the add-ons. RESULTS: Eighty-seven eligible clinics were identified, with 72 unique websites; 37 (43%) clinics were part of one of nine groups of IVF clinics, of sizes ranging from two to eight clinics in the UK. Time-lapse imaging (TLI) was the most frequently advertised of the three add-ons (67% of clinics), followed by PGT-A (47%) and assisted hatching (28%). Very few websites stated that the effectiveness of the add-on was in doubt or unclear (four, two and one websites for TLI, PGT-A and assisted hatching, respectively), and none raised the possibility that an add-on might have negative effects. Claims of efficacy were often based on upstream outcomes (e.g. implantation, pregnancy). Some claims that PGT-A and TLI improved live birth rates were found. There was substantial variation in pricing. CONCLUSIONS: IVF clinic websites provide valuable information for patients seeking fertility treatment so it is key that the information is accurate and complete. There is a need for transparent information on interventions, including uncertainties and risks, to be made available by IVF clinics to support well-informed treatment decisions. The selected add-ons are widely advertised, and there is wide variation in pricing.


Assuntos
Comércio , Clínicas de Fertilização/economia , Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Diagnóstico Pré-Implantação/métodos , Feminino , Fertilização in vitro/economia , Humanos , Gravidez , Diagnóstico Pré-Implantação/economia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA