Consumption patterns and factors associated with inappropriate prescribing of benzodiazepines in Primary Health Care settings.

BACKGROUND: Benzodiazepines are frequently prescribed to treat anxiety and insomnia, but long-term use has been associated with the development of dependence, tolerance, and cognitive decline, especially among older adults. This study aimed to investigate the pattern of consumption and factors associated with inappropriate prescribing of benzodiazepines in primary health care. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional analytical study, using dispensing records of diazepam, clonazepam, and nitrazepam from public pharmacies in a Brazilian municipality between 2018 and 2022. Metrics for benzodiazepine consumption were DDD (Defined Daily Dose) and DDD/1000PD (per 1000 population per day). Long-term/prolonged benzodiazepine use was defined as consuming at least 90 DDD and at least 2 dispensations per year. To ascertain associations between long-term use and predictor variables, a multivariate logistic regression model was utilized. FINDINGS: A total of 40402 participants were included, with an average age of 55 years (SD = 0.30), 38.5% were older aged. Diazepam and nitrazepam exceeded the daily dose recommended. There was a reduction in diazepam consumption during the study period, as calculated by DDD/1.000PD, while the consumption of other benzodiazepines remained stable. However, a significant increase in diazepam consumption is noted when considering the last decade. Prolonged use was observed in 29.1% of participants, with a significant prevalence among the older people (34.8% of them were long-term users) and advancing age was identified as a risk factor for long-term use. Higher PDDs were also associated with long-term use and aging. Participants who used different benzodiazepines during the period had a higher risk of prolonged use. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide insights into the prevalence of problematic utilization of benzodiazepines in primary health care. Authorities and health care providers must take steps to encourage gradual cessation of prolonged benzodiazepine prescriptions and the embrace of suitable strategies for addressing anxiety and insomnia within primary health care settings.

Increased Pneumonia Risk Associated with Concomitant Use of Inhaled Corticosteroids and Benzodiazepines: A Pharmacovigilance Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are effective in managing asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but increase the risk of pneumonia. Benzodiazepines (BZD), commonly prescribed for comorbid psychiatric disorders in asthma or COPD patients, are also associated with pneumonia. This study investigates the risk of pneumonia associated with the concomitant use of ICS and BZD. METHODS: Data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System from Q4 2013 to Q3 2023 were extracted. Reports involving asthma or COPD patients were included. Disproportionality analysis and logistic regression analysis were performed to assess the risk of pneumonia associated with the combined use of ICS and BZD. Additive and multiplicative models were used to further confirm the results. Additionally, subgroup analyses were conducted based on gender, age, and disease type. RESULTS: A total of 238,411 reports were included. The combined use of ICS and BZD was associated with a higher reporting of pneumonia (ROR: 2.41, 95% CI 2.25-2.58). Using additive and multiplicative methods, the results remained significant. The strongest risk signals were observed in specific drug combinations, such as mometasone with clonazepam, budesonide with temazepam, and mometasone with zopiclone. Subgroup analyses showed higher pneumonia risks in females, patients over 60 years old, and those with asthma. CONCLUSION: Our findings identified a significantly elevated pneumonia risk with the combined use of ICS and BZD. These results highlighted the necessity for cautious co-prescription of ICS and BZD and suggested the need for more comprehensive clinical studies to assess this interaction.

Seizure control and complications in patients switching from clobazam to clonazepam due to drug shortage.

BACKGROUND: Antiseizure medication (ASM) shortages are a global problem that have a negative impact on outcomes such as seizure control in patients with epilepsy (PWE). In the case of clobazam (CLB) shortage, there is no study regarding the management strategy. This study aims to investigate the alteration in seizure frequency and the occurrence of side effects in PWE undergoing an abrupt switch from clobazam (CLB) to clonazepam (CLZ), during CLB shortage. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted from electronic health records at our neurology outpatient clinic from January to July 2022. Change in seizure frequency and percentage of CLZ-associated side effects were determined as primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. Potential drug-drug interactions (Level C and above) were evaluated by using Lexicomp Drug Interaction Checker. RESULTS: The analysis included a total of 29 adult patients (15F, median age: 29). The switching ratio was 10 mg CLB for every 1 mg CLZ (10:1). Seizure frequency was higher during the CLZ period compared to the CLB period (p < 0.05), but no status epilepticus cases were observed. All patients exhibited potential drug-drug interactions, leading to reduced CLZ levels in 12 cases. A total of 36 CLZ-associated side effects were identified, with fatigue (19.4 %), drowsiness (16.6 %), and somnolence (13.8 %) being the most prevalent. A positive and strong correlation was found between CLZ dose and the number of side effects (r: 0.556; p: 0.002). CONCLUSION: The abrupt switch from CLB to CLZ was observed to increase seizure frequency without leading to status epilepticus in PWE. CLZ-associated side effects were found to be tolerable despite the abrupt switch. Future studies may explore the effect of alternative switching ratios.

The teratogenesis risk associated with antiseizure medication duotherapy in women with epilepsy.

PURPOSE: To investigate rates of occurrence of pregnancies associated with a foetal malformation (FM pregnancy rates) following simultaneous intrauterine exposure to two antiseizure medications in 524 pregnancies in women with epilepsy from the Australian Pregnancy Register who were treated simultaneously with various combinations and dosages of two antiseizure medications (duotherapy). RESULTS: FM pregnancy rates tended to be higher in those exposed simultaneously to two antiseizure medications, each of which was a statistically significant teratogen (valproate, topiramate, or carbamazepine), than when there was exposure to only one such teratogen. When there was exposure to only one such teratogen together with clonazepam or levetiracetam, for neither of which there was statistically significant evidence of heightened teratogenicity, the FM pregnancy rates also tended to be higher, but less so. When lamotrigine was the other component of the duotherapy with an established teratogen, FM pregnancy rates tended to be lower than that for the teratogen used as monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Leaving aside issues in relation to seizure control, our data suggest that it would be best to avoid using established teratogenic antiseizure medications (carbamazepine, valproate and topiramate) in combination with each other due to the increased FM risks. When combining an established teratogenic medication with a less teratogenic one, i.e. lamotrigine, levetiracetam or clonazepam, lamotrigine appears to be the safer option.

Effectiveness of High-dose Clonazepam Versus Low-Dose Clonazepam With Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Older Adults With Moderately Severe Insomnia: A Prospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of high-dose clonazepam (1 mg) versus low-dose clonazepam (0.5 mg) with cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-i) in older adults with moderately severe insomnia. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in patients who did not respond to low-dose clonazepam for insomnia secondary to chronic medical conditions. After starting with 0.25 mg of clonazepam, their dose was increased to 0.5 mg, then to 1 mg (Group A), or to the same dose with additional CBT-i (Group B). They were followed for 24 weeks, and scores of the insomnia severity index (ISI) and subjective units of distress scale (SUDS) were recorded. Patient adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were documented and assessed for their causality. ISI and SUDS scores were considered primary outcome measures. FINDINGS: Between-group analysis revealed a significant decline in the mean score of ISI at week 16 (P < 0.05) and for SUDS at week 20 (P < 0.05) in group B compared to group A. Similarly, within-group analysis also revealed a statistically significant reduction of the mean score in ISI and SUDS scores at week 4 and 8 (P < 0.05) in both groups. ADRs occurred more frequently in group A (14%) than in group B (5%). Assessments of causality showed that the majority of cases were possible. IMPLICATIONS: For individuals who were resistant to 0.5 mg of clonazepam, adding CBT-i with low-dose clonazepam is a viable alternative to increasing the dose to 1 mg.

Clozapine-Induced Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms and Augmentation with Clonazepam: Risks and Rationales. / Klozapine Bagli Gelisen Obsesif-Kompulsif Semptomlar ve Klonazepam ile Güçlendirme Tedavisi: Riskler ve Gerekçeler.

Obsessive-compulsive symptoms induced by clozapine negatively affect treatment compliance. In some studies, clonazepam was shown to be beneficial in obsessive-compulsive disorder. However, in literature there are case reports of life-threatening complications associated with the combined use of clozapine and benzodiazepines. In this article, the efficacy and safety of the clonazepam augmentation were discussed in two patients who had obsessive-compulsive symptoms induced by clozapine. No life-threatening complications were detected during the follow-up period of more than two years, and the patients benefited dramatically from the addition of clonazepam. In treatment-resistant patients, clonazepam can be used with close monitoring for obsessivecompulsive symptoms associated with atypical antipsychotics. Keywords: Atypical antipsychotics, clonazepam, clozapine, obsessivecompulsive symptoms.

Use of benzodiazepines and benzodiazepine-related drugs in the Nordic countries between 2000 and 2020.

Use of benzodiazepines (BZ) and related drugs is subject to considerable debate due to problems with dependency and adverse events. We aimed to describe and compare their use across the Nordic countries. Data on the use of clonazepam, BZ-sedatives, BZ-hypnotics, and benzodiazepine-related drugs (BZRD) in adults (≥20 years) were obtained from nationwide registers in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden, 2000-2020. Main measures were therapeutic intensity (TI:DDD/1000 inhabitants [inhab.]/day) and annual prevalence (users/1000 inhab./year). Overall, TI of BZ and related drugs decreased in all Nordic countries from 2004 to 2020. However, there were considerable differences between countries in TI. In 2020, the TI of BZ and related drugs ranged from 17 DDD/1000 inhab./day in Denmark to 93 DDD/1000 inhab./day in Iceland. BZRD accounted for 55-78% of BZ use in 2020, followed by BZ sedatives at 20-44%, BZ-hypnotics at <1-5%, and clonazepam at <1-2%. Annual prevalence of BZ use increased with age in all countries, and the highest annual prevalence was observed among people ≥80 years. Overall, the use of BZ and related drugs has decreased in all Nordic countries from 2004 to 2020, however, with considerable differences in their use between countries. The highest prevalence was observed among the oldest age groups-despite warnings against their use in this population.

Safety and efficacy of clonazepam in patients with hemifacial spasm: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Hemifacial spasm (HFS) is an involuntary intermittent twitching of the facial muscles. Medical and surgical treatments can be considered for HFS. Among medical treatments, clonazepam is a benzodiazepine used to treat epilepsy, psychiatric symptoms, and movement disorders. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of clonazepam for the treatment of HFS. METHODS: This randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial prospectively enrolled patients with HFS aged 20-79 years. The patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either clonazepam (0.5 mg twice daily) or a placebo for 4 weeks. All participants underwent clinical assessment and laboratory tests at baseline and visit 2. The primary endpoint was the clinical global impression-improvement (CGI-I) score at visit 2. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients with HFS assessed for eligibility were enrolled between April 2015 and November 2016. Among them, two patients were withdrawn before randomization. Thus, the intention-to-treat analysis included 32 patients with HFS. The median CGI-I scores at visit 2 did not differ significantly between the clonazepam (3; range 1-6) and placebo (3.5; range 3-5) groups. In the safety analysis, only mild or no serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrated the safety of clonazepam in patients with HFS. However, clonazepam did not show a statistically significant effect on HFS. Further studies are needed to provide evidence of the clinical benefits in patients with HFS.

Clinical efficacy of clonazepam in the treatment of status epilepticus.

To explore the clinical efficacy of clonazepam in the treatment of status epilepticus. Totally 60 patients with status epilepticus were identified as research subjects and assigned (1:1) via the randomized double-blind method to receive either diazepam (Valium) comparison group) or clonazepam (observation group). After treatment and follow-up visits, the treatment efficacy, incidence of adverse reactions, quality of life, and recurrence were evaluated and compared between the two groups. The total effective rate of the observation group was 93.33%, which was higher than that of 66.67% in the comparison group (P<0.05). A longer mean duration of drug effect was observed in the observation group than in the comparison group (P<0.05). The observation group outperformed the comparison group in terms of quality of life (P<0.05). The observation group had a lower incidence of adverse reactions than the comparison group (P<0.05). The overall recurrence rate in the comparison group was 23.33%, which was significantly higher than that of 6.67% in the observation group (P<0.05). Clonazepam yields a promising efficacy in the treatment of patients with status epilepticus.

Safety and efficacy of melatonin, clonazepam, and trazodone in patients with Parkinson's disease and sleep disorders: a randomized, double-blind trial.

BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbances are common non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of trazodone with melatonin and clonazepam in patients with PD and sleep complaints. METHODS: This single-center, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted on PD patients with subjective sleep complaints. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive melatonin 3 mg/day, clonazepam 1 mg/day, or trazodone 50 mg/day for 4 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the changes in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores. The mean change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and RBD screening questionnaire (RBDSQ) was considered as the secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: A total of 112 eligible patients were randomized and 93 participants, melatonin (n = 31), trazodone (n = 31), and clonazepam (n = 31), completed the study. There was a significant decrease in PSQI scores after 4 weeks of treatment in all groups. The mean changes of PSQI from baseline were similar among the treatment arms (P = 0.325). Mean changes of RBDSQ and ESS from baseline were significantly different between study arms (P < 0.05). Melatonin intake was associated with a higher decrease in RBDSQ score compared to trazodone (P = 0.011) and clonazepam (P = 0.004). Trazodone intake was associated with a higher decrease in ESS score compared to clonazepam (P = 0.010). Mild adverse events were reported in three patients in the clonazepam, two patients in the trazodone group, and none in the melatonin group. CONCLUSIONS: Trazodone 50 mg/day, clonazepam 1 mg/day, and melatonin 3 mg/day were all tolerable and effective in improving sleep quality in patients with PD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (registration number; IRCT20170821035819N2).

Clonazepam monotherapy for treating people with newly diagnosed epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders worldwide, with an age-adjusted prevalence of 4 to 8 per 1000 population and an age-adjusted incidence of 44 per 100,000 person-years in developed countries. Monotherapy represents the best therapeutic option in people with newly diagnosed epilepsy. This is an updated version of the original Cochrane Review published in 2019, Issue 11. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of oral clonazepam used as monotherapy for newly diagnosed epilepsy, compared with placebo or a different anti-seizure medication. SEARCH METHODS: For the latest update of this review we searched the following databases on 14 September 2021: the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web) and MEDLINE (Ovid) (1946 to 13 September 2021). CRS Web includes randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs from PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the Specialized Registers of Cochrane Review Groups, including Epilepsy. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included RCTs or quasi-RCTs comparing oral clonazepam used as monotherapy treatment versus placebo or a different anti-seizure medication (active comparator) in people of any age with newly diagnosed epilepsy, defined according to the clinical practical definition proposed by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The following outcomes were considered: proportion of participants seizure-free at one, three, six, 12, and 24 months after randomization; proportion of responders (those with at least a 50% reduction in seizure frequency from baseline to end of treatment); proportion of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) during the treatment period or leading to discontinuation during the treatment period; proportion of dropouts/withdrawals due to side effects, lack of efficacy or other reasons; and improvement in quality of life, as assessed by validated and reliable rating scales. Two review authors independently screened all titles and abstracts to assess the eligibility of publications identified by the searches. We independently extracted data from trial reports and cross-checked them for accuracy. Any disagreements between the two authors regarding data extraction were resolved by discussion and consensus. We scrutinized trials and evaluated the methodological quality of all included studies. We used GRADE assessment criteria to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS: Two randomized controlled trials had already been included in the previous version of the review, with a total of 115 participants. One study compared clonazepam to carbamazepine as monotherapy for participants with newly diagnosed psychomotor epilepsy (a condition corresponding to what is now termed mesial temporal lobe epilepsy). One study (published as an abstract) compared clonazepam to ethosuximide as monotherapy for children with absence seizures. Based on the available data and the details on methodology provided, we judged both studies as being at unclear or high risk of bias for the domains assessed (apart from the selective reporting (reporting bias) domain - we judged one study as being at low risk of bias and the other study at high risk of bias). In the study comparing clonazepam to carbamazepine, no difference was found between the groups regarding the proportion of participants who were seizure-free at one month after randomization (risk ratio (RR) 1.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99 to 3.94; 30 participants; very low-certainty evidence), three months after randomization (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.62 to 2.29; 26 participants; very low-certainty evidence), and six months after randomization (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.09 to 2.73; 9 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No statistical difference was found between clonazepam and carbamazepine in terms of proportion of participants with TEAEs leading to discontinuation (RR 2.61, 95% CI 0.80 to 8.52; 36 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and in terms of dropouts/withdrawals due to side effects, lack of efficacy or other reasons (RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.61 to 4.02; 36 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The study did not provide any information on our other prespecified outcomes of interest. The study comparing clonazepam to ethosuximide did not provide any data on efficacy. The proportion of dropouts/withdrawal was higher in the group receiving clonazepam compared to the group receiving ethosuximide (RR 3.63, 95% CI 1.12 to 11.74; 79 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No information on other outcomes of interest was provided in this study. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We did not find any new studies since the last version of this review. There is only limited and very low-certainty evidence from randomized controlled trials on the efficacy and tolerability of clonazepam used in monotherapy for the treatment of epilepsy. No difference in efficacy and tolerability was found in a small trial comparing clonazepam to carbamazepine for the treatment of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Clonazepam was less well tolerated than ethosuximide in a trial of children with absence seizures, however no comparative data on efficacy were provided. There is currently insufficient evidence to support the use of clonazepam as monotherapy treatment for epilepsy.

Deprescribing clonazepam in primary care older patients: a feasibility study.

Background Inappropriate use of clonazepam by older adults is associated with cognitive impairment, delirium, and falls. Strategies to optimize its use are important to increase patient safety. Objective To evaluate the feasibility of a clonazepam deprescription protocol in the elderly. Methods This is a quasi-experimental study. Elderly people with chronic use of clonazepam and attended in primary care units in two Brazilian municipalities were selected. A deprescription protocol was used, which included five fortnightly meetings between the older adults and the research team, to reduce the dose by 25%. Patients received instructions on sleep hygiene behaviors and the advantages of clonazepam deprescription; family physicians followed a flowchart for gradual dose reduction. In the 1st and 5th meetings, there were medical appointments for anamnesis and discharge. The monitoring of patients and the application of tests were carried out by the research team. Results Of the 35 elderly people included in the study, 27 reached the end; 81.5% achieved deprescription: 22.2% stopped completely and 59.3% decreased the dose. At the last meeting, 20% of elderly patients reported an increase in blood pressure. Conclusion The high rate of deprescription and the little relevance of clonazepam withdrawal reactions, showed that the use of the protocol was effective. However, the increase in blood pressure and the worsening of sleep quality in the last meeting show the need for adjustment in the last stage of the deprescription process.

Prediction of treatment outcome in burning mouth syndrome patients using machine learning based on clinical data.

The purpose of this study is to apply a machine learning approach to predict whether patients with burning mouth syndrome (BMS) respond to the initial approach and clonazepam therapy based on clinical data. Among the patients with the primary type of BMS who visited the clinic from 2006 to 2015, those treated with the initial approach of detailed explanation regarding home care instruction and use of oral topical lubricants, or who were prescribed clonazepam for a minimum of 1 month were included in this study. The clinical data and treatment outcomes were collected from medical records. Extreme Gradient-Boosted Decision Trees was used for machine learning algorithms to construct prediction models. Accuracy of the prediction models was evaluated and feature importance calculated. The accuracy of the prediction models for the initial approach and clonazepam therapy was 67.6% and 67.4%, respectively. Aggravating factors and psychological distress were important features in the prediction model for the initial approach, and intensity of symptoms before administration was the important feature in the prediction model for clonazepam therapy. In conclusion, the analysis of treatment outcomes in patients with BMS using a machine learning approach showed meaningful results of clinical applicability.

Clonazepam-induced lichenoid drug eruption: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Lichenoid drug eruption is rare and can mimic idiopathic lichen planus and other dermatoses. Clonazepam, a commonly used drug for the treatment of anxiety-related disorders and seizures, is known to be an unlikely cause of cutaneous adverse effects. Only one case report of LDE due to clonazepam has been reported. CASE PRESENTATION: A 81-year-old male patient with Alzheimer's disease developed a lichenoid eruption after taking clonazepam. He developed a violaceous scaly patch on his lower extremities, from both buttocks to the feet. The cutaneous eruption resolved 2 months after cessation of clonazepam and with initiation of corticosteroid therapy. CONCLUSION: A skin eruption that develops after clonazepam administration can be a lichenoid drug eruption, which is less likely to resolve spontaneously and requires discontinuation of clonazepam administration.

Potentially inappropriate prescriptions to Brazilian older people with Alzheimer disease: A cross-sectional study.

ABSTRACT: Older adults are the leading users of medications, where this can be associated with a high number of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) and consequent harm to health. No Brazilian study evaluating potentially inappropriate prescribing in older patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) was found. This study determined and analyzed the prevalence of PIP and PIM prescribed for older people with AD.A cross-sectional study was carried out at the Specialty Drugs Pharmacy in the city of Sorocaba, São Paulo State, Brazil. The MEDEX system provided the register in older people with AD and data were collected during interviews with patients and/or caregivers between June and September 2017. The PIMs were identified according to the 2019 Beers Criteria. The association between PIMs and independent variables was analyzed by Poisson regression.This study included 234 older patients with AD. The prevalence of PIP prescribed was 66.7% (n = 156). Of the 1073 medications prescribed, 30.5% (n = 327) were inappropriate with most affecting the central nervous system or cardiovascular, particularly quetiapine (12.8%) and acetylsalicylic acid (11.6%), respectively. Around 45.2% of the PIMs should be avoided in older people, especially sertraline (14.2%) and clonazepam (7.4%). After adjusted analysis, the PIMs were associated with the diagnosis of depression (P = 0.010) and the number of comorbidities (P = 0.005).There was a high number of PIMs among older people, a substantial number of which should have been avoided in this population. Health care professionals can apply these findings to improve safety in the use of medications for treating patients with AD.