Usefulness of argon plasma coagulation for superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasia in patients at high risk or with limited endoscopic resectability.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic resection is the standard treatment for superficial esophageal squamous-cell neoplasia (SESCN). However, we encounter patients in whom endoscopic resection is difficult to perform. We retrospectively studied the usefulness of argon plasma coagulation (APC) in patients with SESCN. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study comprised 45 patients with SESCN (81 lesions) who underwent APC in our hospital from March 1999 through August 2016. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment time, the presence or absence of metastasis and recurrence, adverse events, and outcomes were studied. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 40 months. The median age was 70 years. The tumor diameter was 10 mm or longer in 48 lesions and less than 10 mm in 33 lesions. The median treatment time was 22 minutes. The reasons for selecting APC were as follows: technical difficulty caused by the presence of metachronous multiple lesions in the radiation field after chemoradiotherapy or close proximity to the ulcer scar remaining after endoscopic treatment in 49 lesions (60.4%), and the presence of underlying diseases in 26 lesions (32.0%). Adverse events occurred in 2 patients (4.4%) who had hypoxemia due to over-sedation. Two lesions (2.5%) recurred locally but could be locally controlled by additional APC. No patient had metastasis or recurrence or died of esophageal neoplasia. The 3-year overall survival rate was 87.0%, and the 3-year recurrence-free survival rate was 97.2%. CONCLUSION: APC can be a useful treatment option for SESCN in patients with a limited life expectancy, poor performance status, or technical difficulty in resection of superficial neoplasms.

Endoscopic variceal ligation combined with argon plasma coagulation versus ligation alone for the secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) is often recommended as an effective method for the treatment of esophageal varices, despite the important tendency of variceal recurrence. Recent studies indicate that combining EVL with argon plasma coagulation (APC) may be a more effective therapy than ligation alone. To investigate these findings, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of EVL combined with APC versus ligation alone for the secondary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal hemorrhage. All studies were searched through PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Science Direct. The outcome measures were relative risk (RR) or risk difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous data and standardized mean difference for continuous data. Heterogeneity was calculated using the χ and the I-tests. Two investigators independently identified four randomized-controlled trials included in the research. The variceal recurrence rate was significantly lower in the combined therapy group (RR=0.19, 95% CI: 0.09-0.41, P=0.000). The bleeding recurrence and mortalities in the two groups showed no significant differences (RR=0.29, 95% CI: 0.08-1.04, P=0.058; risk difference=-0.02, 95% CI: -0.08-0.04, P=0.576, respectively). Although the pyrexia incidence rate was significantly higher in the combined group (RR=3.42, 95% CI: 1.56-7.48, P=0.002), there was intertrial heterogeneity (I=52.5%, P=0.097). EVL combined with APC is superior to ligation alone for endoscopic variceal recurrence without severe adverse events in secondary prophylaxis against esophageal variceal bleeding. More high-quality studies are needed to strengthen this conclusion.

Endobronchial Treatment of Carcinoid Tumors of the Lung.

BACKGROUND: Bronchial carcinoid tumors are known as low-grade malignancies. Surgery has been proposed as the best treatment of choice for lung carcinoids. However, less invasive treatment approaches may be considered due to low-grade malignancy potential of such tumors. The aim of this study was to review the results of endobronchial treatments of carcinoid tumors of the lung and to compare with the outcome after surgery. METHODS: Initial complete tumor eradication with an endobronchial treatment was attempted for 29 patients. Diode laser or argon plasma coagulation was used during these treatments. Cryotherapy or laser treatments were applied consecutively in patients for whom there was good bronchoscopic visualization of the distal and basal tumor margins and no evidence of bronchial wall involvement. Surgery was performed in cases of atypical carcinoid and in cases of nonvisualization of the basal and distal part of the tumor. RESULTS: Overall, 29 patients have been included (median age 58 years; range, 23-77 years). Median follow-up has been 49 months (range, 22-94 months). A total of 24 patients (69%) had typical carcinoid tumor, 5 patients (31%) had atypical carcinoid tumor. Initial endobronchial treatment provided complete tumor eradication in 21 of 29 patients (72%). Of the eight other patients (28%), two were atypical carcinoids, and underwent surgical treatment. There was no tumor-related death and no recurrence during the follow-up in both groups. There was no difference for survival or recurrence between the surgical and the endobronchial treatment group of patients (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Endobronchial treatment may be considered as safe, effective treatment for typical carcinoid tumors in the central airways. Addition of initial endobronchial treatment had no negative effect on the surgical outcome.

Comparison the efficacy of intermediate dose argon plasma coagulation versus hemoclip for upper gastrointestinal non-variceal bleeding.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic argon plasma coagulation (APC) and hemoclip were used for the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers. There are wide ranges of hemostatic doses (power and flow) of APC used in previous studies. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy and safety of "intermediate dose" APC compared to hemoclips for hemostasis from bleeding peptic ulcer. METHODOLOGY: The present study was designed as a retrospective study using historical controls. One hundred and ninety-four consecutive upper GI bleeding patients with bleeding visible vessel lesions were treated with either APC or hemoclips. There are 110 patients received APC treatment and 84 patients received hemoclip hemostasis. The main outcome measurements were one week rebleeding rate, one month rebleeding rate, surgery, morality, amount of blood transfusion and durations of hospital stay. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in 1 week rebleeding rate (1.8% vs. 2.4%, p = 1.0), 1 month rebleeding rate (0% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.433), mortality, surgery and amount of blood transfusion (2.67 +/- 3.27 vs. 3.04 +/- 2.75 units, p = 0.322). However, the hospital stay was longer in hemoclip group (5.38 +/- 6.76 vs. 8.49 +/- 11.19 days p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: APC and hemoclip are with different hemostatic mechanisms, but the hemostatic outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups. APC is an effective, safe, and easily applicable endoscopic hemostatic modality as hemoclip for patients with non-variceal bleeding.