Tolerability and efficacy of colestipol hydrochloride for accelerated elimination of teriflunomide.

BACKGROUND: Teriflunomide is an oral disease modifying therapy approved for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. Teriflunomide' s pharmacokinetics (PK) contribute to its slow elimination, on average taking 6-8 months, though it can take up to 2 years in some instances. This slow elimination can become problematic in certain clinical situations - such as during pregnancy, when teriflunomide has potential teratogenic effects. In such scenarios, an accelerated elimination procedure (AEP) is recommended. Currently, AEPs with oral cholestyramine or activated charcoal are available but are restricted by adverse effects, limited administration routes, and dosing frequencies. METHODS: A single-center, PK interaction study was performed in a total of 14 healthy volunteers, to investigate colestipol hydrochloride (HCl) as an alternative to cholestyramine for the elimination of teriflunomide. Participants received teriflunomide for 14 days, followed by an AEP with colestipol HCl for 15 days. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The administration of colestipol HCl for 15 days was sufficient to reduce plasma teriflunomide concentrations by greater than 96%. Although colestipol HCl did not completely eliminate teriflunomide with the same effectiveness as cholestyramine, it may offer an alternative method for accelerated elimination of teriflunomide with potentially improved tolerability and more favorable dosing and administration options.

Feasibility study of colestipol as an oral phosphate binder in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Currently available calcium- and aluminium-based phosphate binders are dose limited because of potential toxicity, and newer proprietary phosphate binders are expensive. We examined phosphate-binding effects of the bile acid sequestrant colestipol, a non-proprietary drug that is in the same class as sevelamer. METHODS: The trial was an 8 week prospective feasibility study in stable hemodialysis patients using colestipol as the only phosphate binder, preceded and followed by a washout phase of all other phosphate binders. The primary study endpoint was weekly measurements of serum phosphate. Secondary endpoints were serum calcium, lipids and coagulation status. Analyses used random effects mixed models. RESULTS: Thirty patients were screened for participation of which 26 met criteria for treatment. At a mean dose of 8.8 g/24 h of colestipol by study end, serum phosphate dropped from 2.24 to 1.96 mmol/L (P < 0.001). Three patients required calcium supplementation. LDL cholesterol dropped from 1.75 to 1.2 mmol/L (P < 0.001). Three patients dropped out because of side effects or intolerance of the required dose. CONCLUSION: The results support the feasibility of a larger trial to determine the efficacy of colestipol as a phosphate binder and that other non-proprietary anion-exchange resins may also warrant investigation.

Colesevelam and colestipol: novel medication resins in the gastrointestinal tract.

We report the morphologic description of the bile acid sequestrants (BAS) colesevelam and colestipol, as well as the largest series of cholestyramine. Histologically similar medication resins from 4 institutions were prospectively collected over 1 year (26 specimens, 15 patients). Comorbidities included hyperlipidemia (4/15), hypertension (4/15), inflammatory bowel disease (4/15), coronary artery disease (3/15), diarrhea (7/15), hypothyroidism (2/15), and ischemic bowel (1/15). Sites of involvement included the esophagus (1/26), stomach (1/26), small intestine (1/26), ileocecal valve (1/26), and colorectum (22/26). Associated histologic diagnoses included normal (8/26), chronic mucosal injury (11/26), acute inflammation (9/26), erosion/ulceration (6/26), and cytomegalovirus (2/26). The BAS resins were histologically indistinguishable from each other; they were all eosinophilic on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and lacked internal "fish-scales." To validate these observations, respective medications were submitted for histologic processing; the processed medications were identical to those in the patient specimens. Rare, irregular "fracture" lines presented diagnostic pitfalls by mimicking the true "fish-scales" of Kayexalate and sevelamer. Clues to the correct identification of BAS include recognition that the "fracture" lines were subtle, irregular, and restricted to large fragments or thick sections, likely representing a processing artifact. Moreover, Kayexalate is violet on H&E and black on acid fast bacillus, and sevelamer characteristically displays a 2-tone color on H&E and is magenta on acid fast bacillus. An association with inflammatory injury was seen (15/26). We believe that the BAS are innocent bystanders in complicated patients, although we cannot exclude their ability to cause mucosal injury in specific settings.

Safety considerations with gastrointestinally active lipid-lowering drugs.

Gastrointestinally active agents such as cholesterol absorption inhibitors (CAIs) (eg, ezetimibe) and bile acid sequestrants (BAS) (the resins cholestyramine and colestipol, or colesevelam, a nonabsorbable polymer) offer important options for lipid-lowering therapy. Ezetimibe is a novel CAI that inhibits the absorption of dietary and biliary cholesterol without affecting the absorption of triglycerides or fat-soluble vitamins. In clinical trials, there has been no evidence of increased rates of myopathy or rhabdomyolysis associated with ezetimibe, whether in use as monotherapy or in a combination with statin therapy, although there exist case reports of possible ezetimibe-associated myopathy. Ezetimibe alone does not appear to increase liver transaminase levels significantly, but the coadministration of a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (statin) with ezetimibe marginally increases this risk. However, reported increases in liver enzymes have not been associated with clinically meaningful symptoms and often return to baseline levels after the discontinuation of therapy or with continued treatment. To date, no cases of liver failure, liver transplantation, or death have been reported. BAS have been used clinically since the 1960s for lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Because they are not absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract into the blood, these agents do not contact most body organs and are therefore systemically safe. However, case reports and pharmacokinetic data disclose 3 kinds of adverse effects: (1) the decreased absorption of concomitant medications and sometimes of certain vitamins; (2) the physicochemical alteration of intestinal contents leading to constipation and, very rarely, intestinal obstruction; and (3) modest increases in plasma triglyceride levels due to the alteration of hepatic lipid metabolism. The newest BAS, colesevelam, has greater specificity for bile acids compared with the older agents cholestyramine and colestipol, eliminating most drug interactions and reducing the tendency for constipation. Overall, CAIs and BAS have excellent systemic safety profiles when used alone or in combination with other lipid-lowering drugs.

A randomized crossover trial of combination pharmacologic therapy in children with familial hyperlipidemia.

We sought to determine whether a low-dose combination of a bile acid-binding resin (colestipol) with an hydroxymethylglutaryl CoA reductase inhibitor (pravastatin) would result in improved acceptability, compliance, and effectiveness in lipid-lowering compared with conventional therapy with a higher dose of a bile acid-binding resin only, with fewer side effects. We performed a randomized, crossover open-label clinical trial with two 18-wk medication regimens separated by an 8-wk washout period in 36 children and adolescents with familial hypercholesterolemia or familial combined hyperlipidemia. The regimens included colestipol 10 g/d (10 pills) versus a combination of colestipol 5 g/d with pravastatin 10 mg/d (six pills). All patients were maintained on a fat-reduced diet. Acceptability was better with the combination regimen. Mean compliance was similar and suboptimal (approximately 60%) with all medication components. Mean relative LDL cholesterol lowering was significantly better with the combination regimen (-17 +/- 16% versus -10 +/- 13%; p = 0.045), although insufficient to achieve recommended target values in the majority of patients on either regimen. Both regimens were equally free of adverse effects, with no important effect on chemistry or hematologic values. Patient-reported adverse effects were more common with the conventional-dose colestipol-only regimen. Compliance with medication regimens using the bile acid-binding resins is suboptimal, although combination with a low dose of a statin may result in better lipid lowering.

Colestipol-induced hepatotoxicity.

A 65-year-old man with type IIa dyslipidemia who received flavored colestipol granules 2 scoops/day for 3 months developed asymptomatic hepatotoxicity. Several of his liver enzymes were elevated 10 times the upper limit of normal. One week after discontinuing colestipol, serum transaminases fell dramatically, with some returning to normal limits. Four weeks after colestipol was discontinued, all liver function tests were normal. Rechallenge was not attempted. Other potential causes of hepatocellular injury were evaluated. Bile acid-binding resins commonly are administered to treat type IIa dyslipidemia. Despite extensive use of the resins, significant elevations of transaminase levels are rare. Because the exact mechanism of bile acid resin-induced hepatotoxicity is unknown, high-risk patients may require liver function test monitoring and education on hepatotoxic side effects.

Treating patients with documented atherosclerosis to National Cholesterol Education Program-recommended low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol goals with atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin and simvastatin.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, and simvastatin in patients with documented atherosclerosis treated to U.S. National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) recommended low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentration (< or = 100 mg/dl [2.59 mmol/liter]). BACKGROUND: For patients with advanced atherosclerosis, NCEP recommends lipid-lowering drug therapy if LDL cholesterol remains > or = 130 mg/dl (3.36 mmol/liter). METHODS: A total of 318 men or women with documented atherosclerosis and LDL cholesterol > or = 130 mg/dl (3.36 mmol/liter) and < or = 250 mg/dl (6.5 mmol/liter), and triglycerides < or = 400 mg/dl (4.5 mmol/liter) participated in this 54-week, multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, active-controlled, treat-to-target study. Patients were titrated at 12-week intervals until the LDL cholesterol goal was reached. Number of patients reaching target LDL cholesterol levels and dose to reach target were evaluated. RESULTS: At the starting doses, atorvastatin 10 mg produced significantly greater decreases (p < 0.05) in plasma LDL cholesterol than the other treatments. Subsequently, the percentage of patients reaching goal at the starting dose was 32% for atorvastatin, 1% for fluvastatin, 10% for lovastatin and 22% for simvastatin. Atorvastatin-treated patients required a lower median dose than other treatments. Median doses at week 54 with the last available visit carried forward were atorvastatin 20 mg/day, fluvastatin 40 mg/day + colestipol 20 g/day, lovastatin 80 mg/day, simvastatin 40 mg/day. CONCLUSIONS: A significantly greater number (p < 0.05) of patients with confirmed atherosclerosis treated with atorvastatin reached the target LDL cholesterol concentration at the starting dose than patients treated with fluvastatin or lovastatin, and significantly fewer (p < 0.05) patients treated with atorvastatin required combination therapy with colestipol to achieve target LDL cholesterol concentrations than all other statins tested.

Role of colestipol in the treatment of hyperthyroidism.

The enterohepatic circulation of thyroxine (T4) and triiodothyronine (T3) is higher in thyrotoxicosis. Bile-salt sequestrants bind iodothyronines and thereby increase their fecal excretion. We, therefore, evaluated the effect of colestipol-hydrochloride administration on clinical and biochemical indices of patients with hyperthyroidism. In a prospective, controlled trial, ninety-two adult volunteers with Graves' disease, toxic autonomous nodule or toxic multinodular goiter were randomly assigned into the following treatment protocols: Group 1, 30 mg of methimazole (MMI) and 20 g of colestipol-hydrochloride (COL) daily; Group 2, 30 mg of MMI daily; and Group 3, 15 mg of MMI 20 g of COL daily. The patients were further classified into Group A, severe hyperthyroidism (baseline levels of total T3 (TT3) > or =5 nmol/l) and Group B, mild to moderate thyrotoxicosis (baseline levels of TT-3<5 nmol/l). Crook's clinical index, serum free T4 (FT4), TT3 and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels were determined before (WO), following one week (W1) and two weeks (W2) of treatment. Serum TT3 level decreased (mean+/-SE) at W1 by 40.8+/-2.6% of WO in Group1 and by 29.2+/-2.4% in Group 2 (p<0.001), and down further to 47.8+/-3.0% at W2 in Group 1, and 40.6+/-2.8% in Group 2 (p=0.01). Serum FT4 level decreased (mean+/-SE) from WO to W1 by 31.7+/-2.7% in Group 1 and by 16.2+/-3.1% in Group 2 (p=0.005), and down to 49.1+/-2.8% of WO at W2 in Group 1 and to 38.7+/-3.5% in Group 2 (p=0.07). In sub groups B COL was not effective in reducing thyroid hormone levels nor in ameliorating the clinical status of the patients. However, in Group A3 COL lowered FT4 (p=0.001) and TT3 (p=0.05) levels as compared to group A2. At W2 the clinical hyperthyroidism score improved faster in Group A1 (p<0.001) and Group A3 (p=0.012) as compared to the control Group A2. In conclusion, COL is an effective and well tolerated adjunctive agent in the treatment of hyperthyroidism. Its main effect is in severe cases of thyrotoxicosis, and in the first phase of treatment. As adjunctive COL treatment in hyperthyroidism allows reducing MMI dosage it may decrease the rate of dose dependent MMI side effects.

Low dose colestipol in adolescents with familial hypercholesterolaemia.

The effects of orange flavoured colestipol granules, 10 g/day, in 37 boys and 29 girls aged 10-16 years with familial hypercholesterolaemia were examined first in an eight week double blind, placebo controlled protocol, then in open treatment for 44-52 weeks. All patients were on a low fat diet. Low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were reduced by 19.5% by colestipol v 1.0% by placebo. Levels of serum folate, vitamin E, and carotenoids were reduced in the colestipol group, but not the vitamin E/cholesterol and carotenoid/cholesterol ratios or serum concentrations of vitamins A and D. After one year of colestipol, two thirds of the participants remained in the study, of whom half took > or = 80% of the prescribed dose. Those who took > or = 80% of the dose had a greater decrease in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels than those who took < 80%. No adverse effects on weight gain or linear growth velocity were observed. Although low dose colestipol effectively reduces low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, only a minority of adolescents adhered to the new formulation for one year. Folate and possibly vitamin D supplementation is recommended.

Combination therapy with colestipol and psyllium mucilloid in patients with hyperlipidemia.

OBJECTIVE: To test whether combining psyllium mucilloid with half the usual dose of colestipol reduces the adverse effects associated with colestipol and maintains or increases its efficacy in the treatment of hyperlipidemia. This strategy might make bile acid sequestrants, which are seldom used because they cause adverse effects such as bloating and constipation, more tolerable and less expensive. DESIGN: A randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, controlled trial. SETTING: An outpatient clinic in a tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: 121 patients who had moderate primary hypercholesterolemia (total cholesterol level > 6 mmol/L and < 8 mmol/L; triglyceride level < 3 mmol/L) after following a low-fat diet for 1 year (National Cholesterol Education Program Step Two diet). INTERVENTION: 5 g of cellulose placebo; 5 g of colestipol; 2.5 g of colestipol plus 2.5 g of psyllium; or 5 g of psyllium three times daily before meals for 10 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At baseline and at weeks 4 and 10, fasting blood lipid levels and apoprotein concentrations were measured and a quality-of-life instrument was completed. RESULTS: A combination of 2.5 g of psyllium and 2.5 g of colestipol was better tolerated than and as effective as either 5 g of colestipol alone or 5 g of psyllium alone. The combination therapy and colestipol alone did not differ significantly with respect to changes in individual lipid values. The ratio of total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) was reduced by 18.2% (95% CI, 12.3% to 24%) with the combination therapy; by 10.6% (CI, 2.0% to 15.4%) with colestipol alone; by 6.1% (CI, 1.5% to 10.6%) with psyllium alone; and by 0.1% (CI, -4.8% to 7%) with placebo (P = 0.0002). Combination therapy reduced the ratio of total cholesterol to HDL significantly more than did colestipol alone or psyllium alone (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that adding psyllium to half the usual dose of bile acid sequestrant resins maintains the efficacy and improves the tolerability of these resins.

Colestipol at varying dosage intervals in the treatment of moderate hypercholesterolaemia.

1. Bile acid sequestrants such as colestipol are effective lipid lowering agents but have a poor reputation for tolerability particularly when administered at the originally recommended doses. We have investigated a low dosage regimen with varying dosage intervals in order to assess efficacy and tolerability. 2. This double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel group study was conducted to investigate the effect of varying administration schedules of colestipol (10 g daily), against placebo in reducing LDL cholesterol levels in patients with moderate hypercholesterolaemia on the American Heart Association step 1 diet. 3. Colestipol or matched placebo, was administered as 5 g twice daily (COL am/pm) or 10 g once daily in the morning (COL am) or evening (COL pm) at fixed times with meals. 4. All 98 patients who entered the initial 16 week dietary phase, subsequently entered the 12 week active treatment phase and were randomised to placebo or active treatment and to one of the three treatment schedules. Fasting lipid profiles were performed every 4 weeks during both phases. 5. All active treatments significantly reduced LDL and total cholesterol compared with placebo (COL am: 17% and 10%, COL pm: 18% and 10%, COL am/pm: 19% and 12% (P = 0.0001)). HDL cholesterol rose significantly with COL am (5% (P = 0.021)) and COL am/pm (7% (P = 0.002)) when compared with placebo while a marginal increase was seen with COL pm (4% (P = 0.063)). Colestipol tended to increase serum triglyceride concentrations but the changes were not significant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effectiveness of low-dose lovastatin combined with low-dose colestipol in moderate to severe primary hypercholesterolaemia.

The effect of the combination of low-dose lovastatin and low-dose colestipol was studied among 57 subjects with moderate to severe primary hypercholesterolaemia (total cholesterol > or = 7.0 mmol l-1). Following an 8-week dietary phase, participants were randomized to treatment with 20 mg of lovastatin combined with 5 g or with 10 g of colestipol, or to matching placebo. Baseline total cholesterol was 7.7 +/- 0.9 mmol l-1 after dietary stabilization. Total cholesterol levels were reduced to 5.6 +/- 0.7 mmol l-1 and 5.8 +/- 0.7 mmol l-1 after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment in the lovastatin 5 g-1 colestipol group, and 74% of the subjects achieved the goal of low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels of > or = 4.0 mmol l-1. Among the lovastatin 10 g-1 colestipol group, total cholesterol was reduced to 5.4 +/- 0.5 mmol l-1 and 5.5 +/- 0.9 mmol l-1 following 4 and 8 weeks, and 80% of subjects achieved the LDL cholesterol goal. No change was seen in the placebo group. Thus, low-dose combination therapy with lovastatin and colestipol, in conjunction with dietary treatment, is effective in moderate to severe primary hypercholesterolaemia, and is well tolerated.

Effectiveness of low-dose colestipol therapy in patients with moderate hypercholesterolemia.

Recommended doses of bile-acid binding resins have an established hypocholesterolemic effect, but data on responses to low doses, especially in women and subjects with moderate hypercholesterolemia, are sparse. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of 3 low doses of colestipol hydrochloride was conducted in women and men with moderate hypercholesterolemia. Men and women with plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations greater than 4 mmol/liter (155 mg/dl) and triglyceride concentrations less than 2.82 mmol/liter (250 mg/dl) were recruited for the study. Eligible patients (54 women and 98 men) were placed on the American Heart Association step I diet 6 weeks before randomization. Participants were subsequently assigned to 1 of 4 drug treatment groups (placebo, and 5, 10 and 15 g/day of colestipol in 2 divided doses) for an additional 12 weeks. Of the 152 patients randomized, 141 completed all aspects of the study. For the treatment groups--placebo, and 5, 10 and 15 g of colestipol--LDL cholesterol reductions (mmol/liter) were observed respectively (n = 141): 0.10 +/- 0.49 (2.7%), 0.65 +/- 0.41 (16.3%), 0.98 +/- 0.36 (22.8%) and 1.17 +/- 0.47 (27.2%) (p less than 0.001). Similar changes were observed in total cholesterol and apolipoprotein B concentrations. The apolipoprotein B/LDL cholesterol ratio increased significantly with increasing colestipol dosage. Modest but insignificant changes in plasma triglyceride levels occurred, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels remained unchanged. A dose of 5 g/day of colestipol achieved 51% of the LDL cholesterol reduction noted with 15 g/day. Low-dose colestipol therapy is effective in the treatment of patients with moderate hypercholesterolemia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hydroxycholesterols in serum from hypercholesterolaemic patients with and without bile acid sequestrant therapy.

To assess the effect of bile acid sequestrant therapy on bile acid precursors in plasma, we determined hydroxycholesterols in serum from patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia. Compared with a group of 5 male and 12 female patients without any lipid-lowering drug therapy, which has normal to slightly elevated 7 alpha-hydroxycholesterol, normal 7 beta-hydroxycholesterol and high normal to elevated 26-hydroxycholesterol levels, a group of 5 male and 9 female patients, using colestipol had higher 7 alpha-hydroxycholesterol without overlap, and higher 7 beta-hydroxycholesterol levels, but similar levels of 26-hydroxycholesterol. In the latter group, the ratio between 7 alpha-hydroxycholesterol and total cholesterol in serum was also higher without overlap. Both groups did not differ for age, body weight, body mass index and serum lipid levels. In the group of patients without lipid-lowering drug therapy, 7 alpha-hydroxycholesterol correlated positively with total and low-densitylipoprotein cholesterol, 7 beta-hydroxycholesterol negatively with body weight and body mass index, and 26-hydroxycholesterol positively with body weight. In both groups, 7 alpha-hydroxycholesterol correlated positively with 7 beta-hydroxycholesterol. These results suggest that (1) bile acid sequestrants enhance bile acid synthesis via the 7 alpha-hydroxylation but not via the 26-hydroxylation pathway, (2) serum 7 alpha-hydroxycholesterol level and the ratio between this hydroxycholesterol and total cholesterol in serum might be suitable parameters to check intake of bile acid sequestrants irrespective of dose, and (3) 7 beta-hydroxycholesterol is unlikely to be the result of cholesterol auto-oxidation in vitro.